www.mentalfloss.com Open in urlscan Pro
2600:9000:2510:7200:f:8f3b:1200:93a1  Public Scan

Form analysis
0 forms found in the DOM

Text Content

Skip to main contentEnable accessibility for low visionOpen the accessibility
menu







 * AMAZING FACTS
 * BIG QUESTIONS
 * ENTERTAINMENT
    * ENTERTAINMENT
    * #TBT
    * MOVIES
    * MUSIC
    * POP CULTURE
    * TV

 * HISTORY
    * HISTORY
    * ARCHAEOLOGY
    * BAD OLD DAYS WITH A.J. JACOBS
    * BIOGRAPHIES
    * KING TUT
    * TITANIC
    * WOMEN'S HISTORY MONTH

 * LISTS
    * LISTS
    * BOOKS
    * FOOD
    * LANGUAGE
    * WORDS

 * LIVE SMARTER
    * LIVE SMARTER
    * HEALTH
    * SMART SHOPPING
    * TRAVEL
    * HACKS
    * FUN

 * QUIZZES
    * QUIZZES
    * KENNECTIONS WITH KEN JENNINGS
    * BRAINTEASERS

 * SCIENCE
    * SCIENCE
    * ANIMALS
    * ENVIRONMENT
    * SPACE

 * ALL STORIES
 * NEWSLETTER



 * AMAZING FACTS
 * BIG QUESTIONS
 * ENTERTAINMENT
    * ENTERTAINMENT
    * #TBT
    * MOVIES
    * MUSIC
    * POP CULTURE
    * TV

 * HISTORY
    * HISTORY
    * ARCHAEOLOGY
    * BAD OLD DAYS WITH A.J. JACOBS
    * BIOGRAPHIES
    * KING TUT
    * TITANIC
    * WOMEN'S HISTORY MONTH

 * MORE
    * LISTS
       * LISTS
       * BOOKS
       * FOOD
       * LANGUAGE
       * WORDS
   
    * LIVE SMARTER
       * LIVE SMARTER
       * HEALTH
       * SMART SHOPPING
       * TRAVEL
       * HACKS
       * FUN
   
    * QUIZZES
       * QUIZZES
       * KENNECTIONS WITH KEN JENNINGS
       * BRAINTEASERS
   
    * SCIENCE
       * SCIENCE
       * ANIMALS
       * ENVIRONMENT
       * SPACE
   
    * ALL STORIES
    * NEWSLETTER





5 WILD IDEAS REJECTED BY THE CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION

In researching his latest book, ‘The Year of Living Constitutionally,’ author
A.J. Jacobs came across some bizarre suggestions floated by members of the
Constitutional Convention for the new United States government.

By A.J. Jacobs |May 7, 2024

Can you imagine? / Washington as Statesman at the Constitutional Convention by
Junius Brutus Stearns © CORBIS/Corbis via Getty Images

Imagine an alternative universe in which there’s not one president of the United
States—but three. Picture Theodore Roosevelt, Willam Howard Taft, and Woodrow
Wilson all serving as co-presidents after the election of 1912, their Oval
Office desks abutting like Gen Z coders at WeWork.

Yes, it sounds like the premise for a sitcom. But if a handful of Founders at
the Constitutional Convention in 1787 had voted differently, it might have been
reality.



We tend to think that the U.S. government’s structure was etched in stone from
the very start. Of course we have one president and two senators per state. How
could it be otherwise?

A.J. Jacobs’s ‘The Year of Living Constitutionally.’ / Peter Dazeley/The Image
Bank/Getty Images (background)

I spent a year immersed in all things constitutional for my new book The Year of
Living Constitutionally, and one of the most striking revelations was the wide
variety of ideas considered at the Constitutional Convention and the First
Congress. All sorts of bizarre and fascinating notions were tossed
around—including the five could-have-been versions of democracy below.


EMPTY HEADING

 1. Three Presidents
 2. Politicians Who Do What They’re Told
 3. A United States Without States
 4. A Handcuffed President
 5. A Ginormous Congress  


THREE PRESIDENTS

James Wilson. / Hulton Archive/GettyImages

At the convention, Pennsylvania delegate James Wilson made a shocking proposal:
That America’s government have a single person at its head—a president.



Immediately, several constitutional delegates objected, including Virginia
delegate Edmund Randolph, who called the idea the “fetus of monarchy.” It seemed
like a foolish idea for a brand new country that had just freed itself of a king
after a long and brutal war.

Instead, Randolph’s idea was to elect a council of three presidents, each from a
different part of the country. As wild as this sounds to our modern ears, it was
nothing compared to what Benjamin Franklin had once suggested: That “instead of
a president, the Congress appoint a 12-person ‘executive council’ whose members
would serve for staggered three-year terms,” writes Walter Isaacson in
Smithsonian magazine.  

The debate was fierce, but Wilson was able to successfully make the case that
more than one presidents would result in infighting. The states voted seven to
three for a single president. In a sense, Randolph’s fears of a budding monarchy
have been realized. Modern American presidents—both Democratic and
Republican—have far more power over war, trade, and the nation’s direction than
the founders envisioned.




POLITICIANS WHO DO WHAT THEY’RE TOLD

One rejected version of the First Amendment gave American citizens a huge amount
of power over politicians. In this version, the First Amendment included the
right of voters to “instruct Congress.” What was “instructing”? It had nothing
to do with teaching. In this context, instructing meant that the people told
their representatives exactly how to vote. It was practiced in some colonial
legislatures [PDF]. The constituents would have a town meeting and say, “We the
constituents of the Fifth District of Massachusetts, instruct our representative
to vote yes on this bill and to vote no on this bill.”

Can you imagine how different the United States would be if the word instruct
had remained in the Constitution? What if politicians really were just the
messengers of the people’s will? Think of Texas Senator Ted Cruz saying, “Well,
I don’t agree with solar energy, but I’ve been instructed by my constituents to
pass this bill, so I suppose I vote yea.” We would basically have a direct
democracy. Perhaps unworkable, but interesting for sure.



James Madison and other Founders, who feared mob rule, nixed the word instruct
from the final draft. 


A UNITED STATES WITHOUT STATES

Alexander Hamilton. / GraphicaArtis/GettyImages

Several delegates to the convention believed that states were more of a pesky
hindrance to the federal government than a helpful balance. At one point,
Alexander Hamilton gave a speech advocating that the states all but be
abolished, saying that it would be much more efficient and sensible to have a
single unified government. He later claimed that he was misunderstood, and that
he was OK with the existence of states, as long as they were weaker than the
federal government.



Hamilton also proposed that the states be mere puppets of the federal government
[PDF]. The federal government would appoint governors for each state, and those
governors would have veto power over state laws.

One delegate—Pennsylvania’s James Wilson (again!)—proposed that senators be
elected not by states, but instead by equal-sized districts spanning several
states [PDF], which he believed would solve the battle between small and big
states. If this had gotten through, maybe we’d be called “the United Districts
of America.”


A HANDCUFFED PRESIDENT

As I mentioned, some delegates feared the president would become a king. The
three-presidents idea was shot down, but there were several other ideas on how
to stop the president from morphing into a tyrant. One proposal was to
turbo-charge the power of the president’s cabinet, requiring the president to
get its approval before acting. If this had come to pass, Joe Biden would have
needed Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen’s thumbs-up before signing a law.



Another proposal was for the Congress to elect the president. The House and
Senate—not American citizens or the electoral college—would choose who occupied
the Oval Office. This system be similar to the parliamentary democracies seen in
European countries such as Germany and Sweden. Its proponents believed it would
discourage a president from attempting a power grab because he’d know that
Congress could vote him out.

In the end, neither idea made it through, and the convention greenlit a
presidential office with few guardrails.


A GINORMOUS CONGRESS  

In 1789, the First Congress passed 12 amendments to the Constitution and
submitted them to the states for ratification. The states approved 10 of those
12 amendments, and those 10 became the famous Bill of Rights (the right to free
speech, the right to bear arms, etc.).



So what happened to the other two original amendments? One lay in a zombie state
for more than 200 years before being ratified in 1992 (it’s the Twenty-Seventh
Amendment, which says that a sitting Congress cannot give itself a pay raise).

The other didn’t get approved by enough states—but if it had been, we would
currently have a lot of congresspeople. The amendment stipulated that each
Congressional district have a maximum of 50,000 American citizens, which means
that, based on the current population of the United States, we’d have around
6600 congresspeople instead of our current 435. That’s enough representatives to
fill Radio City Music Hall and then some. Nowadays, the average district has
about 765,000 people, with the largest (Delaware at-large) with 989,948,
according to the 2020 census.

Interestingly, this mega-Congress amendment wasn’t an afterthought. In fact,
when James Madison created the list of those first 12 amendments, the
50,000-person limit was the very first amendment. The right to free speech was
third (after the ones about congressional size and pay). So if all had gone
according to Madison’s plan, journalists would be fighting for their Third
Amendment rights, and the NRA would be focused on the Fourth Amendment.



Read More Articles About American History:

> manual


RELATED TAGS

 * GOVERNMENT
 * PRESIDENTS
 * WAR
 * LISTS
 * History
 * AUTHOR

Home / HISTORY


Around the Web
Recommended by





 * ABOUT
 * CONTACT US
 * NEWSLETTERS
 * PRIVACY POLICY
 * COOKIE POLICY
 * TERMS OF SERVICE
 * ACCESSIBILITY STATEMENT
 * SITEMAP
 * A-Z Index
   Cookie Preferences



© 2024 Minute Media - All Rights Reserved


Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility