www.eeas.europa.eu
Open in
urlscan Pro
2600:9000:25c8:ac00:9:f27c:8ac0:93a1
Public Scan
URL:
https://www.eeas.europa.eu/delegations/un-geneva/ohchr-informal-briefing-human-rights-treaty-body-strengthening-process-eu-...
Submission: On November 30 via api from US — Scanned from US
Submission: On November 30 via api from US — Scanned from US
Form analysis
1 forms found in the DOMGET /search_en?s=62
<form action="/search_en?s=62" method="get" id="views-exposed-form-global-search-solr2-page-1" accept-charset="UTF-8">
<div class="form--inline clearfix">
<div class="js-form-item form-item js-form-type-textfield form-type-textfield js-form-item-fulltext form-item-fulltext">
<label for="edit-fulltext">Search</label>
<input placeholder="Search the Website" data-drupal-selector="edit-fulltext" type="text" id="edit-fulltext" name="fulltext" value="" size="30" maxlength="128" class="form-text form-control">
</div>
<div class="js-form-item form-item js-form-type-date form-type-date js-form-item-created form-item-created">
<label for="edit-created">From</label>
<input type="date" data-drupal-selector="edit-created" id="edit-created" name="created" value="" size="30" class="form-date form-control">
</div>
<div class="js-form-item form-item js-form-type-date form-type-date js-form-item-created-1 form-item-created-1">
<label for="edit-created-1">To</label>
<input type="date" data-drupal-selector="edit-created-1" id="edit-created-1" name="created_1" value="" size="30" class="form-date form-control">
</div>
<div data-drupal-selector="edit-actions" class="form-actions js-form-wrapper form-wrapper" id="edit-actions"><input data-drupal-selector="edit-submit-global-search-solr2" type="submit" id="edit-submit-global-search-solr2" value="Search!"
class="button js-form-submit form-submit">
</div>
</div>
</form>
Text Content
Skip to main content An official website of the European UnionAn official EU websiteHow do you know? All official European Union website addresses are in the europa.eu domain. See all EU institutions and bodies This site uses cookies. Visit our cookies policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences. Accept all cookies Accept only essential cookies Delegation of the European Union to the UN and other international organisations in Geneva * About us WHAT WE DO ABOUT THE AMBASSADOR EEAS HEADQUARTERS * Relations with the EU * Practical Information PRACTICAL INFORMATION See also Consular support for EU citizens * Global Gateway and projects * Opportunities OPPORTUNITIES See also Vacancies Grants Tenders Auction sales * Newsroom and Resources NEWSROOM & RESOURCES See also Press materials Stories & Blogs Publications Campaigns Media Gallery EU STATEMENTS See also Human Rights Council UNHCR - High Commissioner for Refugees Conference on Disarmament and other fora UNCTAD - UN Conference on Trade and Development ILO - International Labour Organization IOM - International Organization for Migration and other migration fora WHO - World Health Organization WHO/Pandemic Agreement and IHR negotiations WIPO - World Intellectual Property Organization UNECE - UN Economic Commission for Europe UN Global Compacts on Refugees and Migration Other conferences and fora Archives 2011 - 2016 EEAS ARCHIVES * English * Website Language * English * Page Translation * English * Français * Български * Español * Čeština * Dansk * Deutsch * Eesti * Ελληνικά * Gaeilge * Hrvatski * Italiano * Latviešu * Lietuvių * Magyar * Malti * Nederlands * Polski * Português * Română * Slovenčina * Slovenščina * Suomi * Svenska * Русский * Українська Close Disclaimer This is a machine translation provided by the European Commission’s eTranslation service to help you understand this page. Please read the conditions of use. Select language below българскиespañolčeštinadanskDeutscheestiελληνικάEnglishfrançaisGaeilgehrvatskiitalianolatviešulietuviųmagyarMaltiNederlandspolskiportuguêsromânăslovenčinaslovenščinasuomisvenska————————русскийУкраїнська Accept and continue * SEARCH Search From To BREADCRUMB 1. EEAS 2. UN Geneva 3. OHCHR informal briefing on the Human Rights Treaty Body strengthening process - EU Statement * Share * Facebook * LinkedIn * X * Whatsapp * E-mail * Gmail * PrintFriendly * Typepad * Pinterest * Blogger * Pocket * YahooMail * Threads * Weibo * Viadeo * Reddit * Qzone * Netvibes * Yammer * Tumblr * Digg * Mastodon * BlueSky PRINT OHCHR INFORMAL BRIEFING ON THE HUMAN RIGHTS TREATY BODY STRENGTHENING PROCESS - EU STATEMENT 02.11.2023 Geneva Press and information team of the Delegation to the UN in Geneva OHCHR informal briefing on the Human Rights Treaty Body strengthening process 1 November 2023 EU statement High Commissioner, The EU and its Member States wish to commend your office for the work and reflection in support of the process of strengthening the Treaty Body system. We reaffirm the importance of the Treaty Bodies in the protection and promotion of human rights. We ourselves strive to ratify the international instruments in the area of human rights and related protocols, and to recognise the competence of the corresponding Treaty Bodies, and we encourage other States to do the same. We underline the need to fully respect the Treaty Bodies independence, and to prevent and react to any intimidation or reprisals against those who collaborate with the Treaty Bodies. Treaty Bodies have a prominent role within the entire human rights system and should contribute to improving the effectiveness and efficiency of the system. We therefore welcome the OHCHR working paper and would like to offer the following comments: 1. In terms of the schedule of reviews, we express our firm support for the establishment of a predictable schedule over 8 years for the Treaty Bodies that have periodic reviews, allowing for the completion of reviews for all State Parties regardless of the submission of their report or their effective participation to the review, as well as limiting overlaps and facilitating cost-efficient preparations for States. While we still analyse the benefits of the respective options, we encourage further pilot testing of clustered reviews in the coming months. 2. Concerning follow-up reviews we would see the option 1 “correspondence only” as the simplest and low-cost solution, already well tested by several Treaty Bodies. We also support the idea of a limited number of issues that could be raised in such a follow-up review (up to 4 issues as recommended by the Chairs in their conclusions last June). 3. We further very strongly encourage the harmonization of the working methods of the Treaty Bodies, while recognizing their specificities, including the generalised use of simplified reporting procedures, coordination on list of issues prior to reporting, and limiting the list of issues to 25 to 30 questions. Many of these proposals do not need any further guidance or budget allocation from Member States, but can be - and should be - implemented immediately. We believe that cross-treaty bodies coordination should be further developed and strengthened, and we believe that the practice so far has not been sufficient. 4. Finally, we have been very supportive of the efforts to ensure a digital uplift and we encourage further work to introduce the adapted online tools and platforms. A key priority for the digital uplift should be the introduction of a digital case management system and an online submission platform for individual complaints, as recommended in the 2020 Treaty Body review process. The current alarming backlog in the review of individual communications leaves complainants in legal uncertainty for a very long time, which has a serious impact on victims and rights-holders. A modern, digital case management system and an online submission platform, meeting the requirements of handling sensitive data, would, when paired with clear admissibility criteria, enhance the efficiency and transparency of the system, and would benefit all parties involved in the litigation of individual cases before the Treaty Bodies. We wish to invite the Office to finalize the implementation plan, so that the discussions next year on the SG report and the biennial GA resolution could provide an opportunity for decisions, when relevant. We also understand the need for providing the adequate resources for the implementation of some of the presented workstrands. We would welcome further evaluation of the resource implications by the OHCHR in order to allow forthcoming discussions. In the meantime, we encourage to start putting into place various measures that do not require further guidance by Member States, since they are already covered by the resolution 68/268 and subsequent resolutions and reports concerning Treaty Body reform. We thank you once again for the opportunity of such an informal exchange today and look forward to supporting the progress on the implementation. I thank you, Back to top EUROPEAN UNION WEBSITES European Union | European Commission | European Parliament | European Council | All EU Institutions Contacts Data protection Privacy statements Cookie policy Europa analytics Language policy Legal notice Accessibility Login