www.quewolucijoowin.tk
Open in
urlscan Pro
2606:4700:3031::6815:21c5
Public Scan
URL:
https://www.quewolucijoowin.tk/
Submission: On January 24 via api from US — Scanned from US
Submission: On January 24 via api from US — Scanned from US
Form analysis 5 forms found in the DOM
GET https://varsh00.wordpress.com/
<form method="get" id="searchform" action="https://varsh00.wordpress.com/">
<div>
<input type="text" class="field" name="s" id="s" value="Search" onfocus="if (this.value == 'Search') {this.value = '';}" onblur="if (this.value == '') {this.value = 'Search';}">
</div>
</form>GET https://varsh00.wordpress.com/
<form method="get" id="searchform" action="https://varsh00.wordpress.com/">
<div>
<input type="text" class="field" name="s" id="s" value="Search" onfocus="if (this.value == 'Search') {this.value = '';}" onblur="if (this.value == '') {this.value = 'Search';}">
</div>
</form>POST https://subscribe.wordpress.com/
<form method="post" action="https://subscribe.wordpress.com/" accept-charset="utf-8" style="display: none;">
<div>
<input type="email" name="email" placeholder="Enter your email address" class="actnbr-email-field" aria-label="Enter your email address">
</div>
<input type="hidden" name="action" value="subscribe">
<input type="hidden" name="blog_id" value="72011083">
<input type="hidden" name="source" value="https://varsh00.wordpress.com/">
<input type="hidden" name="sub-type" value="actionbar-follow">
<input type="hidden" id="_wpnonce" name="_wpnonce" value="5bbe39d02f">
<div class="actnbr-button-wrap">
<button type="submit" value="Sign me up"> Sign me up </button>
</div>
</form><form id="jp-carousel-comment-form">
<label for="jp-carousel-comment-form-comment-field" class="screen-reader-text">Write a Comment...</label>
<textarea name="comment" class="jp-carousel-comment-form-field jp-carousel-comment-form-textarea" id="jp-carousel-comment-form-comment-field" placeholder="Write a Comment..."></textarea>
<div id="jp-carousel-comment-form-submit-and-info-wrapper">
<div id="jp-carousel-comment-form-commenting-as">
<fieldset>
<label for="jp-carousel-comment-form-email-field">Email (Required)</label>
<input type="text" name="email" class="jp-carousel-comment-form-field jp-carousel-comment-form-text-field" id="jp-carousel-comment-form-email-field">
</fieldset>
<fieldset>
<label for="jp-carousel-comment-form-author-field">Name (Required)</label>
<input type="text" name="author" class="jp-carousel-comment-form-field jp-carousel-comment-form-text-field" id="jp-carousel-comment-form-author-field">
</fieldset>
<fieldset>
<label for="jp-carousel-comment-form-url-field">Website</label>
<input type="text" name="url" class="jp-carousel-comment-form-field jp-carousel-comment-form-text-field" id="jp-carousel-comment-form-url-field">
</fieldset>
</div>
<input type="submit" name="submit" class="jp-carousel-comment-form-button" id="jp-carousel-comment-form-button-submit" value="Post Comment">
</div>
</form>POST
<form method="post">
<input type="submit" value="Close and accept" class="accept"> Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use. <br> To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: <a href="https://automattic.com/cookies/" rel="nofollow">
Cookie Policy </a>
</form>Text Content
THE FANDOM MENACE WIDE WORLD OF FANDOM, EXPLORE YOU SHOULD
* Home
* Glossary
* Hi, my name is Varsha!
I'm going on an adventure! - Bilbo Baggins
LATEST
PRONOUNCED: /MEE-M/
Meme
pronounced; mee-m
It technically means “an element of a culture or system of behaviour passed from
one individual to another by imitation or other non-genetic means” (thanks
Google), however, us folk here at the fandom would better know it as ‘those
pictures that someone captions and they go viral because they are funny’. There
are a lot of memes, ones that have been prevalent through time, and ones that
stick around for the length of a particular event or issue. The long term memes
include Unsure Fry, am I the only one, first world problems, success kid, bad
luck Brian, Good Guy Greg, Scumbag Steve/Stacy, one does not simply, I don’t
always, Willy Wonka, Alien guy, grumpy cat, conspiracy Keanu and hundreds more.
How do these memes come across? Why?
Think about emoticons and so on…
We have been using them for many, many years in an attempt to convey our emotion
or feelings online. With the absence of facial expressions when talking online,
different methods of expression have to be used. A lot of feelings can be
conveyed using memes, because people who are familiar with the context and
background of it, can quite easily decipher the nature of what you are trying to
say. For example, in my previous post about metadata, I used Alien guy to convey
the way people often feel about metadata. People not familiar with the tone of
Alien guy would not understand the humour behind it. History Channel
presenter, Giorgio A. Tsoukalos, often tends to explain inexplicable phenomena
by blaming it on aliens. Anything and everything in the past were done by
extra-terrestrial beings. He is a meme because he is mocked for his belief in
ancient aliens. Aliens are like magic to him – the explain everything. The
mockery has condescension and a hint of frustration behind it, and is often used
to make ordinary things (such as metadata) appear to be unreal or inexplicable.
Read more about the origin here.
Memes aren’t just used for humour, however, they are also used to make
political, religious and/or social comments by the users. The keep calm meme I
used above is actually an example of how a government poster became a meme. The
original keep calm and carry on poster was a motivational poster released by the
British government in 1939 in preparation for the second world war. Many years
after the war, someone spotted it by a window and decided to use it as a
decorative piece. The rest, as they say, is history. Political memes, on the
other hand, tend to be more offensive, abrupt, upfront, and mocking. A
particular popular one was one of Mitt Romney saying he had “binders full of
women” in his office. This comment was of course used straight away to label him
as a “sexist pig”. The opposition rejoiced as the internet exploded with memes
in response to the comment. Through the use of these memes, the public conveyed
their dislike and derision for Romney and that comment.
Memes are a fundamental part of fandoms, as members share quotes, pictures, or
gifs, as a way to connect, and express their fanning. Almost every quote or
scene from a movie, book, or said by a celebrity, is almost always circulated
immediately within their respective fandoms, via memes. For example,
J.K.Rowling’s recent tweets and anagrams about a potential new Harry Potter book
being written, has been shared in every way possible by every Potterhead. These
tweets were analysed to their core in order to figure out all the meanings
behind them.
It’s actually ironic how some Fandom picture can become a universal internet
meme. For example, the “one does not simply” meme originated from Boromir
talking about getting to Mordor in the movie The Lord of the Rings (although
LOTR fans will point out that the scene used for this dialogue is incorrect).
This is such a unique way for those in and out of the LOTR fandom to connect! I
claim it as ironic because LOTR fans are often called ‘nerds’ or ‘geeks’, but
the “cool” person using those terms will actually interact with the Boromir meme
– most probably not even knowing where it originated from. The power of memes is
severely understated, as you don’t realise how a completely average thing can
become a universal symbol that conveys meaning, even if people don’t know the
story behind it. You don’t have to have watched LOTR to ‘get’ the ‘one does not
simply’ meme.
Posted by Varsha | October 19, 2014 | Categories: Uncategorized | Leave a
comment
THAT’S SO META(DATA)
Tags. We all know what they are. We all know what tagging does. It’s that word
or couple of words that turn dark blue and/or underlined when published
alongside a blog post or tweet. We know that it helps others find our posts –
although a vast majority of us use it simply to #becuteorfunny and
#confusepeoplewithridiculouslylongtags. See, there’s this thing called
metadata…and after some digging, I think I’ve figured out how this tagging thing
works, and how us bloggers or microbloggers (I’m looking at you, Twitter) can
learn to use them in the most effective and efficient way possible.
Metadata is a set of data that describes and gives information about other data.
It’s sort of like inception – a dream within a dream…this is information about
information. Metadata is the who, what, when, where, why and how that describes
your data, document, photo, video, etc. This groups the data together
(taxonomy), which allows us to locate it more easily in the future. For example,
if you are looking for a file you saved on your computer 2 days ago, and you
don’t remember its name, then you can filter your documents to ones that were
opened on that specific date. The date is part of the metadata of the file. In
regards to the fun stuff, when you tag a photo or post on your blog/Facebook, it
becomes information about that post, and is grouped with other posts with the
same tag. This allows others, or yourself, to search the specific tag (maybe
based on interests) and find all the posts relating to it. This is why posts
with multiple tags have a higher discoverability rate than those with one or
two, because it is in more taxonomies, and so easier to come across.
Twitter users already know the deal with ‘trending tags’ and using tags that are
popular in the moment. However, trending tags do fizzle out quite quickly, and
change day to day. This is fine for Twitter, as each tweet generally has a short
lifespan. For instagram, tumblr and other blogs, however, tags would be more
effective if they are keywords that are relevant to the post.
Denis Duvauchelle writes about how to keywords to make a post discoverable and
popular in his article Tags and Hashtags: The Ultimate Guide to Using them
Effectively. He states that there are three types of tags that should be
included on each post; the core keyword, the secondary key phrase, and the “in
the now” key phrases. Say it’s a post about the recent trailer of the new Hobbit
movie, then you can tag something long term, such as #LordOfTheRings or #LOTR.
These hashtags will be around indefinitely, and will always be used to direct
people to the Lord of the Rings fandom. Secondary tags such as #Hobbit
#NewZealand or #Gandalf can be used. These tags aren’t changed often, and are
still relevant to the post and the content. Finally, you have your #NewTrailer
#Hobbit3 #Smaug #SoExcitedForNewHobbitMovie tags. These ones will last a day or
two and aren’t as relevant, but will direct some people to your post. In this
manner, you get to cover all your bases, and increase your post’s longevity.
Don’t get sucked into the ‘tween tags’ (my own name for it) where the tags sound
like a teeny bopper getting too excited. I know that I probably don’t have the
most effective tags every time, but you learn from watching others.
Additionally, Denis also makes an excellent point about researching your tags
before you post them. Of course this isn’t imperative for every post that you
publish on your personal blog. But if you want to sound professional about
something…or are posting instructions, or tips, or your educated opinion on
something, then ensuring that your post includes appropriate tags will lead it
to being read by more people – especially by more people that are interested in
the topic. In the end, it’s a free country and you can tag your posts however
suits your personality and style of writing, but this wannabe blogger wants to
cross the t’s and dot the i’s in effective tagging.
P.s. I used this platform called Topsy to find which tags to use for this post.
Here is an example of me trying to decide whether I should use the tags #tag
#tagging or #blog. Clearly the results really helped me narrow my tags down from
10 to about 4.
Posted by Varsha | October 5, 2014 | Categories: Uncategorized | Tags: fandom,
metadata, tag, twitter | 1 Comment
TWITTER – A DOUBLE EDGED SWORD
My several years experience of using Twitter has made me realise that the
platform is a double edged sword. It has many positive features, such as
providing users with the ability to share their thoughts and feelings in a
click. It also has many negative features, such as providing users with the
ability to share their thoughts and feelings in a click.
There are many users that should not be allowed to tweet,
however, the ones constantly under the limelight are those used to it –
celebrities. One would think that their prominence alone would require them to
have filters and advisors for every tweet they decide to post, but the
accessibility and personalisation of Twitter provides them with an unfiltered,
intimate connection to the public. Naturally, a celebrity’s tweet and opinion is
much more highly regarded than the general public’s, so if their opinion is not
agreeable with majority of the Internet, their reputation can spiral downwards
in mere hours. Alec Baldwin, for example, has a rocky relationship with Twitter;
quitting and rejoining the microblogging site several times. His famous rants
and racist tweets were enough to discolour anyone’s judgement on him. The
unfiltered, immediate connection that Twitter offers allows no chance to
reconsider or think about the tweet that you post in the heat of the moment.
It’s kind of like sending a drunk text message to your ex – except it’s to
millions of viewers rather than just one.
Then you have someone like Khloe Kardashian who tweeted that Kourtney Kardashian
tasted her own breast milk, and Justin Bieber with his pointless tweets on
selfies he posts, and Paris Hilton who tweeted that she couldn’t even bare to
think about touching a black person. Miley Cyrus, Lindsay Lohan, Ashton Kutcher,
all the Kardashians, Cher…WHY DO YOU HAVE TWITTER!!!? George Clooney, in his
interview with Esquire, actually concurs with my opinion, and says that some
celebrities shouldn’t have Twitter. From the perspective of a famous person, he
doesn’t understand why celebrities would want to put themselves out there even
more than they already are.
> First of all, the worst thing you can do is make yourself more available,
> right? Because you’re going to be available to everybody. But also Twitter. So
> one drunken night, you come home and you’ve had two too many drinks and you’re
> watching TV and somebody pisses you off, and you go ‘Ehhhhh’ and fight back.
>
> You go to sleep, and you wake up in the morning and your career is over. Or
> you’re an asshole. Or all the things you might think in the quiet of your
> drunken evening are suddenly blasted around the entire world before you wake
> up.
This star has ever so eloquently conveyed a message that I believe a lot of
celebrities should take to heart. Because it’s George Clooney, and not me,
fingers crossed his view is shared amongst the celebrity sphere. Of course not
every celebrity demonstrates through their tweets that they don’t have to be
smarter than a primary schooler to be famous. Actress Emma Watson (beloved in
all fandoms) is an inspiring role model for women everywhere. Not only does this
woman have an ivy league university degree, a successful acting and modelling
career, and a super hot look; she is a leader in feminism and is doing wonders
to change the world. Her very recent acquisition of a Twitter account further
demonstrates her adorable personality, and great work.
I can’t pick on celebrities just posting tweets, however, and must at least
mention the – mostly undeserved – hate they get from Twitter too. You can send a
tweet to a celebrity, and there is actually a chance that they would read it –
your tweet gets sent straight to their pocket, or personal laptop. This
connection can be used for good, with many fans sharing their love for a
particular celebrity; but the tweets that trend the most are usually negative
and/or offensive towards the celebrity. Just recently, Jimmy Kimmel launched a
new segment on his show where celebrities read mean tweets about themselves.
Although it makes us laugh, there is a sad revelation that no matter how famous
they are, they are still people – and our words can have an impact on them. We
may not consider celebrities “real people” (which is why we get excited when
they reveal they use the same brand of shampoo as us mortals), but they are –
and the continuous advancement of technology and social media allows us to form
this human connection with them all.
Posted by Varsha | September 21, 2014 | Categories: Uncategorized | Tags:
badtweet, blog, celebrity, celebritylife, celebritytweet, emmawatson, facebook,
famoustweets, fan, fandom, goodtweet, microblog, microblogging, online,
onlinemedia, social, socialmedia, tweet, tweets, twitter | Leave a comment
FIFTY SHADES OF THE INTERNET
Fifty shades of grey? Try fifty shades of the Internet.
Yes, even though we all love and worship our beloved internet and online
communities, there are many, many grey areas that we simply cannot deny. Call
them what you will; ethical issues, moral issues, privacy issues, legal issues,
or copyright issues…they all encompass the blurring of boundaries between what
is private, and what belongs to the public.
New media means there are different forms of content producing, content
distributing, and content remixing. This rings especially true for Fandoms. Fans
all over the net are taking original material and sharing them, changing them,
and reproducing them. It’s not stealing right? If an author publishes a book for
us, it is ours to do with it whatever we will. This is simply one of the
ambiguous grey areas that lurk behind Fandoms.
Take JK Rowling for example (author of the Harry Potter books, and my own
personal role model), she is suing The Harry Potter Lexicon for breaking the
copyright guidelines established for her works. MTV wrote a comprehensive
article on this debate; see if you agree with the author or the fan?
This case highlights one of the most prevailing problems pertaining to Fandoms.
Every Fandom has at least one website, which is a sort of nest for its members.
It is where any news is first read, where pictures are first posted, fanfics
written, OTPs made, and where unofficial encyclopaedias are created for fantasy
worlds. Lexicon, previously praised by JKR for being her “natural home”, may
have taken it too far by choosing to publish an encyclopaedia created by the
many pages on their website. JKR calls it “wholesale theft”. Read more about it
here.
So what is the guideline for these websites? Are fans even aware of the
copyright laws they may be breaching when exulting in the joy of their favourite
book or movie?
The copyright law of 1976 is an extensive read, but here are the four rules
being used by the court to determine the winner in the JKR vs Lexicon case.
1) The purpose and character of the use.
* It is basically an opinion of whether the new material is “transformative” to
the original work, or simply superseding it. The value of the original work
versus the value of the new one.
2) The nature of the copyrighted work.
* Published/unpublished? Fiction/nonfiction?
3) The amount … of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a
whole.
* How much of the original work are you taking.
4) What is the effect of the use on potential market value?
* Will the sales of the new work overtake the sales of the original work? Will
it take sales away from the original work? Will is stop people from watching
the original movie or reading the original book?
Most fans don’t have to worry about this act, unless they are publishing
something for commercial purposes. We all quote books and movies in
conversations, and write canons in our notebooks, but unless we are hoping to
publish it, or use it for commercial purposes, we should be fine. Unfortunately,
I can’t say the same for our favourite websites and online communities,
however…with lawsuits flying left, right, and centre – it’s anyone’s guess where
the grey areas will spread next.
It is a smudged line between what is private and what is public, I mean, if it’s
on the net, it’s meant to be public right? Anyone should be able to use it!
Well, apparently not. What do you think? What do these grey areas mean for the
wide world of Fandoms?
Edit: The above post is regarding the US copyright laws which allows “fair use”.
Australian copyright laws are the opposite, however. Anything (even this blog)
is supposedly breaking the law. Sharing Youtube videos, pictures, articles,
songs, books, DVDs, and all forms of social media usage is in some way illegal
in Australia. Check out this important and eye-opening article by news.com.au
regarding the absence of fair use in Australia.
Posted by Varsha | September 7, 2014 | Categories: Uncategorized | Tags:
copyright, ethics, fair use, fandom, fiftyshades, HarryPotter, internet, JKR,
JKRowling, law, Lexicon, moral, privacy | Leave a comment
COMMENTS – TO HAVE, OR NOT TO HAVE. THAT IS THE QUESTION.
There are many debates going on about enabling an online comment section versus
disabling one. There are equally passionate arguments for both sides, often
(ironically) occurring via comments for a particular article or blog. Yes, the
primary rule for the Internet is “Don’t read the comments”, but I find enjoyment
in observing the online behaviour of anons. The condescending comments are
usually coated in hypocrisy and irony, and I find that most of the time, two
people will be on the same side, yet still argue about a nuance. It does make me
wonder though, the effect this has had on Fandoms – which is almost solely made
up of user produced content.
Fandoms are meant to be a group of people celebrating this one topic. Sharing
ideas, cast/author interviews, fanfic and so on. Such a large group of
passionate, opinionated people obviously can not survive online without clashing
heads. Most fans are friendly, and willing to share their love for
something/someone with strangers on the net. I personally become extremely
enthusiastic when someone asks me what my favourite Harry Potter quote is, or
which version of Sherlock I like best. Why would I hesitate to enrich someone’s
life with these not-quite-useful facts I know?
There are a lot of professional commentators that argue with a reasoning and
purpose, but then there are those users whose comments border on being cyber
bullying. For example, the term “fan” is very ambiguous, yet some people delight
in scorning “fans” and denouncing them as such, because they do not fit a
particular criteria. What does this mean for the future of Fandoms? Can people
no longer voice their own interpretation of the particular book or movie? Can
someone no longer say they like that book, without first listing 100 facts about
it? Some people don’t even know they are fans. I have had instances where I hear
a new band on the radio, and Google their fan bases and websites to discover
more about them. I find myself listening to their music often, and think they
are talented – yet I couldn’t tell you what the lead singer’s favourite food is.
Does that make me not worthy of participating in the shared enjoyment of their
music? I am happy to be a ‘mainstream fan’, thank you very much.
On the flip side, not having the comment section can also mean the end of
Fandoms. Especially science fiction/fiction Fandoms. Author, Brad R Torgersen
made a great point in his post, regarding this situation.
“It’s good (to me) because it means the marketplace (for people producing
product) is a bull marketplace. Depending on what your goals and aspirations
are, you have a potential audience of hundreds of millions of people”.
A lot of users and Fandom participants are now becoming authors or
professionals; and it often starts from the comment section. Fanfic, for
example, builds up over comments, and over time, and suddenly they realise they
have a story on their hands. How do you think Fifty Shades of Grey (originally a
fanfic for Twilight) came about? If users aren’t able to feed ideas off each
other, and post their work online, then Fandoms as we know it will dwindle down
to just authors or creators of a website speaking to no one. Authors do not have
the power. We, as an audience, do. Someone can post a great idea, but if no one
is there to read it, then it’s not effective is it? Sure, only about 10% of
people who read the post/article will comment, but that 10% lead to the spread
of the story, and make it big.
There is no winner in this debate, however, I doubt that comments for science
fiction/fiction stories/blogs/articles/fanfic etc, will ever stop. If you do not
give the people the power and ability to voice their opinions and
interpretations to your text, then you may as well not write it. Every follow,
like, thumbs up etc, that a writer gets, plays an important part in moving their
post forward and making it bigger. Why write, if no one will read? Fandoms have
come a long way, yet they still have a long way to go.
Posted by Varsha | August 24, 2014 | Categories: Uncategorized | Tags:
articles, blogging, comments, cyber bullying, fan, fandom, fandoms, fanfic,
feedback, posting | Leave a comment
ORIGIN AND EVOLUTION OF FANDOMS
Fandoms cover all areas of interest; from movies, to books, to music, sports,
and politics. However, when the term “fandom” is used online, it generally
refers to science-fiction or fiction fandoms (a.k.a. sf/f). Science fiction
fandoms originated with Gernsback, who encouraged fans to comment on his science
fiction pulp magazine. Tara Balakrishnan talks more about it here. Fiction
fandoms, however, date way back to the 19th Century. Here’s how.
The year was 1891 when Conan Doyle published his first short story on the now
infamous Sherlock Holmes, which then resulted in the first known account of fans
and fandoms. Fans of books and movies are generally more active in their
fanning; and partake in writing fanfic, shipping, clubs, discussions and
more. Organized Sherlock Holmes fandom dates from 1934, when the elite group
called Baker Street Irregulars were founded in New York City and the Sherlock
Holmes Society arose in London. Both are active today, although the London
organization was disbanded in 1937 and reformed in 1952. These groups expanded
Holmesian speculation to create “the Great Game”, which assumes that the stories
are all accounts of true events written by Dr. Watson, and that Doyle was merely
Watson’s literary agent. These assumptions, and the resulting scholarship, might
be regarded as early manifestations of meta. At the time, Doyle received
countless letters with alternative stories about Mr Holmes and Dr Watson (now
called fanfic); sold merchandise with quotes on it; and there was even a
renumbering of Baker Street, to put in the fictitious apartment that Doyle had
created for Sherlock (221b Baker Street). By now, the academic attention the
bible received could be applied to the Sherlock Holmes stories.
London was in an uproar and the hype only escalated when Doyle had the
unfortunate idea to end Mr Holmes life by having him pushed of the Reichenbach
fall by Moriarty (you may be familiar with May 4th being Star Wars Day, but to
this fandom, it is Reichenbachday – the day Sherlock died). Of couse this death
was received with much hate and indignation – so much that people cancelled
their subscription to the magazine that published these stories. Despite the now
slight distaste Doyle had for his greatest literary work; the influence of fans
is such, that he brought Holmes back to life and continued on with the fantasy.
The intensity of this fanning can still be witnessed today, and has actually
increased due to the introduction and progression of social network sites.
Evidence being the continuation of the Sherlockian fandom to this day –
resulting in movie and TV series adaptations of the stories.
No one can deny that social media hasn’t changed the way the world works. The
ease with which one can now share information has effected a lot of bodies,
including Hollywood and authors. This sharing of information has also allowed
the concept of fandoms to evolve and grow, as fans had a new, more efficient,
way to communicate. Instead of having local club meetings – or using mail to
deliver opinions – one can now hop on their computer at any time and join a blog
or shoot a complaint. There are blogs like Tumblr that are almost entirely
devoted to different fandoms; and hold countless posts of quotes, images, memes,
gifs, comments, and opinions of thousands of people around the world. We have
been connected in a way that we never were before, and obsessions can now be
fully indulged with strangers that we can bond with over the internet.
This innate need for humans to share and connect…
…may be why blogs are the earliest, and most popular form of social network
sites. Power that the Sherlock fans displayed when their hero got killed, is
still resonating with the ordinary man, and the audience have now become the
producers. We are creating the content on blogs, which has allowed it to be
integrated into daily life and become an everyday part of the internet. Thus,
fandoms have been thriving as never before, and are prominent now due to the
role that social media has in everyone’s lives.
Posted by Varsha | August 10, 2014 | Categories: Uncategorized | Tags: blogs,
DrHouse, fan, fandoms, history, irregulars, Reichenbach, sherlock, sherlock
holmes, social media | 1 Comment
TWITTER
My Tweets
RECENT POSTS
* pronounced: /mee-m/
* That’s SO Meta(data)
* Twitter – a Double Edged Sword
* Fifty Shades of the Internet
* Comments – To have, or not to have. That is the question.
RECENT COMMENTS
* pronounced: /meeeeeee-m/ | The Fandom Menace on That’s SO Meta(data)
* César Albarrán T (@Viscount_Wombat) on Origin and Evolution of Fandoms
ARCHIVES
* October 2014
* September 2014
* August 2014
META
* Register
* Log in
* Entries feed
* Comments feed
* WordPress.com
RECENT POSTS
* pronounced: /mee-m/ October 19, 2014
* That’s SO Meta(data) October 5, 2014
* Twitter – a Double Edged Sword September 21, 2014
* Fifty Shades of the Internet September 7, 2014
* Comments – To have, or not to have. That is the question. August 24, 2014
ARCHIVES
* October 2014
* September 2014
* August 2014
Blog at WordPress.com.
* Subscribe Subscribed
* The Fandom Menace
Sign me up
* Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
* * The Fandom Menace
* Customize
* Subscribe Subscribed
* Sign up
* Log in
* Report this content
* View site in Reader
* Manage subscriptions
* Collapse this bar
Loading Comments...
Write a Comment...
Email (Required) Name (Required) Website
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website,
you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy