scroll.in Open in urlscan Pro
142.93.213.69  Public Scan

Form analysis
0 forms found in the DOM

Text Content

Support Scroll.in

Support Scroll.in Your support is crucial: India needs independent media and
independent media needs you.

Become a Member
Scroll.in Sunday, July 30th 2023

Scroll.in
 * Become a Member
 * The Plus
 * 
 * 

 * Home
 * Common Ground
 * India Fix
 * Eco India
 * Latest
 * The Reel
 * The Field
 * Magazine
 * Video
 * Trending
   * Watch: Singers Pink and Brandi Carlile’s duet of ‘Nothing Compares 2 U’ in
     honour of Sinead O’Connor
   * Watch: How dogs and humans reacted to man walking on all fours dressed in a
     realistic dog costume
   * ‘If you don’t take off your clothes, we will kill you’: Kuki women paraded
     naked in Manipur
   * Why are so many Indian politicians giving interviews to social media
     influencers?
   * Hindutva leader Sambhaji Bhide booked for remarks about Mahatma Gandhi
   * Plastic pellets wash up on Mumbai and Palghar beaches, environmentalists
     raise alarm
   * Principle over prestige: When India forfeited a Davis Cup final to
     Apartheid South Africa
   * Between the real and the imaginary: For KG Subramanyan, or ‘Mani da’ as we
     called him
   * ‘History’s Angel’: Past and present collide to tell uncomfortable truths
     about Muslim lives in India
   * Forty years since Black July: Seven novels about the traumatic legacy of
     the Sri Lankan civil war
   * Indian-origin engineer Hirsh Vardhan Singh announces US presidential bid
   * Andhra Pradesh: Mother dog follows police for help in flood-hit area, they
     rescue her puppies
 * Sections
   * Magazine
     
   * Politics
   * Culture
   * India
   * World
   * Film and TV
   * Music
   * Books and Ideas
   * Business and Economy
   * Science and Technology
   * In Pictures
   * Announcements
   * Bookshop
   * Pulse

 * Become a Member
 * 
 * 










COOKIE POLICY

We use cookies for analytics, advertising and to improve our site. You agree to
our use of cookies by hitting ‘Accept’ button, closing this message box or
continuing to use our site. To find out more see our Privacy policy .

Accept

Ad

Scroll


EXPLAINED: WHY NEWS PUBLISHERS ACROSS THE WORLD ARE SUING GOOGLE – THEIR BIGGEST
SOURCE OF READERS


ONCE LAUDED FOR LEVELLING THE PLAYING FIELD FOR JOURNALISTS, BIG TECH IS NOW
FACING CRITICISM FROM THE SAME COMMUNITY.

Karnika Kohli
Jul 16, 2023 · 06:30 am
 * 
 * 

Google claims that at least 24 billion of its users go to publisher websites
each month using Google Search and News. | Created on Canva.

Canadians will no longer be able to find local news websites while searching for
news on Google. That is because Google, the world’s largest search engine,
announced on June 29 that it will be removing links to Canadian news from its
products.

The company’s decision was a reaction to a new Canadian law that compels tech
giants to pay news publishers for using their content.

Senior Google official Kent Walker said that the Canadian government’s decision
was unfair as it would force the company to pay simply for facilitating access
to news from Canadian publishers.

However, Canadians will still be able to access these websites by typing the
URLs directly into their browsers.

This is not the first time Google has found itself in a battle with publishers.
The platform has also faced lawsuits in the United States, the United Kingdom,
the European Union, Germany, France and Belgium.


WHY ARE NEWS PUBLISHERS SUING GOOGLE?

A lawsuit filed by Gannett, one of the largest news publishers in the United
States, in June answers this question.

“Today, online digital advertising is a $200 billion business – a nine-fold
increase since 2009,” the suit said. “Yet, despite the opportunity for
publishers to produce more news content and earn more revenue, news
publications’ advertising revenue has declined by nearly 70% over the same
timeframe.”

The company holds Google responsible for this revenue drop, as also for newsroom
employment dropping by more than half since 2009. More than 20% of all
newspapers have closed and the circulation of the remaining daily and weekly
newspapers have decreased by more than 40% in the same period, Gannett alleged.


WHY IS GOOGLE SAID TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS?

There are two ways in which this happens.

1. Digital advertising

Most media organisations earn the bulk of their revenues from advertisements. In
the pre-internet era, publishers negotiated deals with individual advertisers.
Publications had a limited number of ad slots and advertisers.

As publications moved online, publishers started auctioning ad space
electronically using sophisticated software. Because space on the internet is
unlimited, publishers sold exponentially more ad slots every day. This year, the
global digital advertising market is estimated to be valued at $626.9 billion.

However, Google and its parent Alphabet have a monopoly over the advertising
technology tools that publishers and advertisers use to buy and sell online ad
space.

Created on Canva.

The bulk of online display advertising space is bought and sold in real-time on
online “advertising exchanges”. These exchanges are very similar to
electronically traded financial markets. In these exchanges, Google is the
largest seller of ad space globally. It operates the leading ad trading platform
as well as the most prominent intermediaries that ad buyers and sellers go
through to trade.

This means that Google has a conflict of interest. To use a football analogy,
Google is a referee who is also playing in the game.

In her widely lauded research paper titled “Why Google Dominates Advertising
Markets”, researcher and author Dina Srinivasan alleges, “Google’s exchange
shares superior trading information and speed with the Google-owned
intermediaries, it steers buy and sell orders to its exchange and websites
(Search & YouTube), and abuses its access to inside information.”

Srinivasan wrote in The New York Times: “ These problems took root more than a
decade ago when Google made a bid for DoubleClick, the popular service that
helps websites sell ad space. The service became part of Google’s ad exchange
division, which it later called AdX.”

After acquiring DoubleClick, Google not only pushed its advertising clients to
its own exchange but also stopped competing exchanges run by Yahoo, Microsoft
and others bidding on the ad space, she alleged.

“Unsurprisingly, such self-dealing allowed Google – a late entry to the exchange
market – to quickly grow AdX into the largest trading venue for ads,” she noted.
“Websites paid the price: The lack of exchange competition resulted in their ad
space selling for up to 50% less than what it otherwise would.”

In 2020, more than 84% of the $146 billion in ad revenue generated by Google
went towards its own Search and YouTube products. In 2022, Google’s ad revenue
amounted to $224.47 billion.

2. Google Search, News, Discover products

According to a 2022 report, 99,000 search queries were processed by Google every
second. Over 8.5 billion times a day people across the world searched for
information such as recipes, news, games, weather updates, celebrity gossip and
much more.

Every search leads to pages full of links with thumbnails, headlines and
snippets based on which the users decide which site they want to visit – and
which they choose to avoid. Many publishers believe that Google is infringing on
their content by showing these snippets. This practice also keeps users from
clicking on external website links since they get the gist of the content on
Google itself. As a consequence, some publishers say that if the tech giant
wants to use their content, it should pay.

In 2020, 64.82% of searches conducted on Google globally concluded within the
platform itself – without users clicking on external website links, including
those of publishers.

In India, the News Broadcasters and Digital Association, Digital News
Publishers’ Association and Indian Newspaper Society have filed complaints
against Google with the Competition Commission of India about their interests
being affected.

The News Broadcasters and Digital Association in its complaint claimed that the
tech giant “free-rides on the content of its members by forcing them to provide
their news content to Google to prioritise their web links in the Search Engine
Result Page”.

India’s Competition Commission in October 2022 ordered an investigation against
the tech giant into allegations that it has abused its dominance in the news
aggregator space, violating the Competition Act, 2002.


DO PUBLISHERS HAVE ANY OPTIONS?

Short answer: No. Google accounts for the biggest source of traffic for most
publishers.

The company claims that at least 24 billion of its users go to publisher
websites each month using Google Search and News.

“The challenge with Google’s model is its emphasis on scalability,” said the
former revenue head for an Indian digital-only newsroom who asked to remain
anonymous. “If you fail to grow your content, your traffic gradually diminishes.
This often compels publishers to resort to creating subpar content and
constantly seeking new tactics to manipulate the Google algorithm and improve
Search Engine Optimisation” or SEO.

SEO refers to the technical and other practices a website adopts to try to get
it to appear higher on the pages of search engine results.

For over 25 years, publishers have been offering their content in exchange for
potentially wider audience reach. “While this dynamic is particularly visible
with platforms like Facebook and Google, it is important to note that these
terms of trade apply to almost every platform,” said Rasmus Kleis Nielsen, a
professor of political communication and Director at the Reuters Institute for
the Study of Journalism at the University of Oxford. Google and Facebook are
among the funders of his institute.

Microsoft-run search engine Bing, for example, does not provide payment to
publishers and neither does Elon Musk-owned Twitter. Similarly, many creators
upload their podcasts to Spotify, videos to TikTok and posts on Telegram for
free. Most publishers agree to these terms of trade.

Taking a contrarian viewpoint, Nielsen believes that this arrangement seems to
reflect the market value of much online news, given the abundant supply of free
content. “It is crucial to remember that the majority of people do not pay for
online news, and even among those who do pay, they consume more news for free
than the news they pay for,” he said.

According to Ahmed Aftab Naqvi, global CEO & co-founder of the integrated
marketing agency GOZOOP, major publishers give 5%-20% of their ad revenue to
Google. Small, emerging publishers, on the other hand, pay as much as 25% or
more of their ad revenue to Google.

A study found that UK publishers received an average of just 51% of advertiser
spending, with the remainder going to intermediaries in the supply chain. A
third of this money was unaccounted for. The UK regulator estimated that, on
average, at least 35% of the value of advertising went to intermediaries rather
than publishers.

“Since Google is the majority stakeholder in the digital advertising space, they
unilaterally decide the amount to be paid to the publishers for the content
created by them [and] also the terms on which the amount has to be paid,” Sujata
Gupta, secretary general of the Digital News Publisher’s Association, told an
interviewer in January 2022.

Google, on its part, claims that publishers retain 90% of the revenue generated
through ads on average.

Created on Canva.

Google has a larger than desirable impact on several aspects of online
publishing, said Mithun Kidambi, head of product and revenue at TheWire.in. From
how publications get traffic to what they need to focus in the area of product
development to what kinds of content will get traffic, everything is decided by
Google, he said.

“Tech platforms claim that they want to showcase only quality content to its
users but quality is a subjective thing,” said Kidambi. “The definition of
quality remains subjective and ever-changing. It does not solely pertain to
journalistic quality, as there is no definitive way to measure it.”

Small newsrooms claim that Google’s search results are biased in favour of
large, well-known publishers, which makes it difficult for smaller publishers to
get their content seen by users.

Google has denied these allegations, and it has argued that its search results
are based on objective criteria, such as the relevance and quality of the
content.

There has been a noticeable shift among publishers in how they approach Google
Search algorithm’s core updates in the past five years, said Prasad Sanyal,
business head at Times Internet Limited, which runs websites like The Times of
India and Navbharat Times. The Times Group has signed a revenue sharing deal
with Google News Showcase.

The Google Search algorithm’s core updates are changes that Google makes to its
search algorithm in order to improve the quality of search results. Core updates
are typically rolled out over a period of several weeks, and they can have a
significant impact on the ranking of websites on the search page. As a result,
publishers have to be mindful of how their content is affected by these updates.

“They have become more cautious and guarded, as it takes time to fully grasp the
extent of the changes, and the available documentation from Google is often
insufficient,” said Sanyal. “Predicting the impact of these updates has become
increasingly challenging. Previously, there used to be two major updates per
year, but now the situation remains uncertain for a while.”

By the time publishers figure out the necessary adjustments to regain their
traffic, the next update rolls in.

How Google Search works. (Source: Google)

While Google has documented some aspects of how its algorithms work, there is no
way for anyone to know for sure why their content ranks or does not. The
platform has a long list of best practices for websites to follow but the
decision on a website’s credibility, which decides how their content will be
ranked on Google Search, is made by the tech giant.

When websites fail to meet the criteria, they are penalised: their links drop in
Google Search pages. Publishers are constantly trying to figure out how to get
their work showcased on Page 1 of Google Search.

A recent study shows that only 0.63% of Google searchers clicked on items that
appear on the second page of results.

“As publishers, we are compelled to chase headlines and write about topics that
are popular among searchers,” said Kidambi. “Even if we cover subjects of
national importance, our rankings can suffer if people are not actively
searching for the content we produce.”

When Google introduces new formats such as “visual stories”, publications have
to invest resources to effectively implement them. “It’s not just about the
newsroom; the content management system needs to be enabled to support the new
format, and training is required for the newsroom staff,” said Sanyal.

The editor of a prominent business news outlet said that it is too late for
publishers to try to battle with Google for revenue. This person explained that
Google Search is evolving from being just an index of links into a more
comprehensive and intelligent search engine. With the introduction of artificial
intelligence, Google Search is now able to understand the context of users’
search queries and provide more relevant results.

The editor believes that this change will make it even more difficult for
publishers to compete with Google. As firms enter this new territory, regulation
will be required.

With all platforms now endeavoring to give all the answers along with the search
query on their platforms, users will no longer need to go to publishers’
websites to find the information they are looking for, the editor said.

This person also said that reader revenue can come in many forms. He argued that
it is not necessary to have a large audience of millions of people in order to
be financially sustainable: instead, publishers should focus on building small,
engaged communities of followers.

Their newsroom is also a Google News Showcase partner.


WHAT DO POLICY EXPERTS THINK?

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, the Union Minister of State for Electronics and
Information Technology, earlier this year said that technology companies that
display news content in their search results and feeds must give a “fair share
of revenues” to publishers.

He expressed the hope that the Digital India Bill, which is expected to replace
the Information Technology Act, will address the imbalance of power between
content creators and ad-tech companies.

Chandrasekhar said that the current system is “disproportionate” and gives too
much control to ad-tech companies. He argued that this imbalance is preventing
publishers from earning a fair return on their content.

Created on Canva.

Shashank Mohan from Centre for Communication Governance at National Law
University Delhi believes the best way to hold big tech companies accountable is
by building frameworks of transparency in platform regulation.

“The Digital Services Act and the Digital Markets Act in the [European Union]
are two recent efforts that build-in various transparency requirements for tech
companies that obligate them to share information, such as on ad networks and
their recommender systems/algorithms,” he said. “Such transparency can help with
better understanding the complex nature of these platforms.”

In 2021, Australia made headlines when it passed legislation requiring Facebook
and Google to share algorithmic information with and pay licensing fees to news
organisations. The News Media and Digital Platforms Mandatory Bargaining Code
was enacted after a landmark report by the Australian Competition and Consumer
Commission.

The report found that Big Tech platforms were benefiting from news content
without paying for it, while controlling much of the advertising market that the
news industry relies on. The commission based its decision in part on the
intrinsic value that news provides to the platforms.

Google and Facebook threatened to pull their services from Australia to avoid
complying with the law. Facebook made good on this threat in 2021, when it shut
down its service for nearly a week.

This happened just as the government was rolling out the Covid-19 vaccine, and
it had a significant impact on small, nonprofit, regional, community, and rural
media outlets. These outlets rely on social media to reach audiences with local
news, and the shutdown cut them off from these audiences.

Eventually a compromise was reached. Press Gazette, a British magazine, has
reported that Google paid only the top media houses in Australia.

India is one of a handful of countries in the Global South that has both the
expertise, user base, and regulatory influence to pursue the Australian
strategy, suggests researcher Courtney C Radsch, the author of a paper titled
“Making Big Tech Pay for the News They Use”.

However, Jeremy Dear, deputy general secretary of the International Federation
of Journalists, which represents journalist unions and associations in more than
140 countries, is wary of the Australian approach. “The fear is that a lot of
small publications will lose out because they don’t have that commercial clout
to do a deal, so it reinforces the big media companies,” he warned in an
interview with Radsch.

India will face distinctive challenges due to the diverse nature of media
newsrooms, said Mansi Kedia, Policy Researcher, Indian Council for Research on
International Economic Relations.

“Larger organisations will have a stronger position when it comes to
negotiations, while smaller and regional ones may struggle,” she said. “These
smaller entities require wider reach but lack the necessary leverage in
negotiations.”

Pointing out the demise of thousands of local news organisations in the United
States, the business head of one of India’s biggest newsrooms, said, “When the
news organisations suffer, democracy suffers as well. A shortage of trusted
reporters who hold government officials accountable has exacerbated issues at
the local level. In the US, according to a study by University of Notre Dame and
University of Illinois researchers, communities located in news deserts suffer
from less competitive political campaigns, less informed voters, and lower voter
turnout. Without reporters holding officials accountable, these communities also
see higher public costs.”

This person said it would be good if Google looks at its revenue from democratic
countries and non-democratic countries and understands that for its own
long-term survival, healthy democracies are essential.

Prateek Waghre, policy director at Internet Freedom Foundation, was not certain
if Australia’s link tax approach will actually help journalism and said it could
fundamentally alter the functioning of the internet as we know it today.

“The way Google established agreements with news publishers in Australia
appeared to be completely arbitrary, resembling more of a lobbying effort that
primarily benefited mainstream publishers,” he said. “It is important to
recognise that these deals do not provide a comprehensive solution to the
challenges faced by the media industry.”

The introduction of a digital tax distributed to publishers by the French,
Spanish, Italian and British governments raises concerns, particularly within
the context of India. Such a tax could potentially be used as a means for the
government to exert control over the media, said Waghre.

“It would be more prudent to focus on examining Google’s role in the adtech
market, as that is likely where the crux of the issue lies – potential abuse of
dominance within the adtech space,” he said.

We believe everyone, everywhere should be able to access a diversity of credible
sources to get the information they need. That starts with a news industry that
gives every community a voice, says Google. (Source: Google News Initiative)


HOW IS GOOGLE TRYING TO HELP THE NEWS INDUSTRY?

Over the last few years, the tech giant has amped up its outreach efforts with
publishers. Through its Google News Initiative, the platform has partnered with
7,000 news publishers in over 130 countries and disbursed more than $300 million
in grants. It has also provided training for 570,000 journalists in over 70
countries. (Scroll is the recipient of a Google News Initiative grant.)

In 2018, the Google News Initiative India Training Network was launched to help
journalists fight misinformation. The network hosts regular training sessions
for journalists, newsrooms and media educators.

“The biggest win for us was the shift in our own mindsets from a journalist
thinking to a product and business thinking,” said Bhanupriya Rao from BehanBox,
a participant of the GNI Startups Labs. “This thinking is helping all our future
innovation and taking our journalism to bigger audiences.”

Sanyal commended Google’s efforts to educate journalists about fact-checking
through its programmes and said that The Times of India newsrooms have benefited
from these initiatives. However, Kidambi suggested that “the outreach programme
is essentially a marketing programme wearing different clothes.”

Google and Twitter are the only two major tech platforms that work with
publishers.

“Despite their collaborations, the funds and grants they provide to combat
misinformation are comparatively small considering their substantial revenue,”
said former journalist who has worked in the fact checking ecosystem in various
capacities. “In response to external pressure, they often announce grants;
however, they have not yet established a sustainable environment or provided
sufficient incentives for fact-checkers.”

In 2020, Google CEO Sundar Pichai announced the launch of Google News Showcase
to pay publishers for high-quality news content. Publishers who participate in
the programme can earn money by giving Google exclusive access to their content.
Google then displays this content in a dedicated section of Google Search and
Google News.

According to Google, the Google News Showcase programme is available in 22
countries, where they have partnered with over 2,300 publishers.

In India, Google has signed Google News Showcase deals with more than 80
partners representing more than 130 publications, including national, regional
and local news organisations. The Times Group, The Hindu Group, HT Digital
Streams Ltd, Indian Express Group, ABP LIVE, India TV, NDTV, Zee News, Amar
Ujala, Deccan Herald, Punjab Kesari, The Telegraph India, news agencies IANS and
ANI have signed revenue sharing deals with Google.

The platform has also launched a programme for English, Hindi, Kannada, Tamil,
Telugu, Bengali, Malayalam, Gujarati and Marathi language publishers in India to
help them increase their reach.

Kedia contends that grants provided often end up benefiting Google, as the
content created ultimately finds its way onto the Google platform.

Scroll contacted Google for comment but their spokesperson was unavailable.
Questionnaires sent to the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology,
the Ministry of Corporate Affairs and the Competition Commission of India also
remain unanswered. This piece will be updated if responses are received.

Disclaimer: Scroll is a recipient of a Google News Initiative grant and the
author has been a part of some training sessions and events hosted by the
platform.

Buy an annual Scroll Membership to support independent journalism and get
special benefits.

Pick An Amount
 * $50
 * $100
 * $250
 * $1,000
 * Other
   $

No ads
Evening Edition newsletter
Members-only events
Weekly Edition newsletter
Merchandise
Help design new products
Editorial meet-up invitation
Continue to payment
We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
 * Google
 * News publishers
 * Google adsense
 * how google makes money
 * digital advertising
 * news media business model
 * google adtech
 * reader revenue
 * Big Tech
 * online marketing

 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 

 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 



Ad