speakingsherpa.com Open in urlscan Pro
192.185.37.195  Public Scan

Submitted URL: http://speakingsherpa.com/
Effective URL: https://speakingsherpa.com/
Submission: On October 14 via manual from GB — Scanned from GB

Form analysis 1 forms found in the DOM

GET https://speakingsherpa.com/

<form class="search-form" method="get" action="https://speakingsherpa.com/" role="search" itemprop="potentialAction" itemscope="" itemtype="https://schema.org/SearchAction"><input class="search-form-input" type="search" name="s" id="searchform-1"
    placeholder="Search this website" itemprop="query-input"><input class="search-form-submit" type="submit" value="Search">
  <meta content="https://speakingsherpa.com/?s={s}" itemprop="target">
</form>

Text Content

SPEAKINGSHERPA

Become an Inspiring Speaker


 * Delivery
 * Content
 * Design
 * Odds and Ends
 * Contact
 * About
 * LinkedIn


HOW TO TELL A BUSINESS STORY USING THE MCKINSEY
SITUATION-COMPLICATION-RESOLUTION (SCR) FRAMEWORK

Posted on November 18, 2017 Written by jdonovan 0 Comments

Story elements

Before we delve into what goes where in the SCR framework, consider the
following story elements:

 1. The stable era
 2. The discovery of a major problem
 3. The identification of the root causes
 4. The projected impact should the root causes not be addressed
 5. The plan to solve the problem by addressing the root causes
 6. The result of the attempt to solve the problem
 7. The plan to address remaining issues, if any, from the attempt to solve the
    problem

 

The Situation-Complication-Resolution (SCR) Framework

Now, let’s define each component of SCR:

 * Situation
   The framing of the important, recent context the audience already knows and
   accepts as fact.
 * Complication
   The reason the situation requires action.
 * Resolution
   The action required to solve a problem (or capture an opportunity).

 

Placing Story Elements into the SCR Framework

You might have noticed I avoided using the word “problem” in the definitions of
the situation and complication.  The reason is that the problem can appear in
either place.

To understand where the problem goes, ask yourself: “Can I reasonably expect
that the audience is aware of the problem?”  If not, then the problem goes in
the complication and the story is as follows:

S = 1 = The stable era
C = 2 + 3 + 4 = The discovery of a major problem, the identification of the root
causes, and the projected impact should the root causes not be addressed.
R = 5 = The plan to solve the problem by addressing the root causes.

Next, assume the audience is aware of the problem but not its root causes, in
which case we have:

S = 1 + 2 = The (brief review of) stable era and the discovery of a major
problem
C = 3 + 4 = The identification of the root causes and the projected impact
should the root causes not be addressed
R = 5 = The plan to solve the problem by addressing the root causes

You know where this is going… next assume the audience is aware of the root
causes, in which case we have:

S = 1 + 2 + 3 = The (extremely brief review of) stable era, (the brief review
of) the discovery of a major problem, and the identification of the root causes
C = 4 = The projected impact should the root causes not be addressed
R = 5 = The plan to solve the problem by addressing the root causes

Last, assume the audience is aware that an attempt has been made to solve the
problem, in which case we have:

S = 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 [I avoid writing all this out and instead emphasize that
1-4 should be very brief so that the focus is on reminding the audience about 5,
the plan.]
C = 6 = The result of the attempt to solve the problem
R = 7 = The plan to address remaining issues, if any, from the attempt to solve
the problem

 

Ordering the Situation, Complication, and Resolution

The two main ways to order the framework components are: S-C-R and R-S-C.  Use
S-C-R when you want to build up the story, esp. when the audience is unlikely to
immediately accept your resolution. Use R-S-C when the audience will mostly
accept your resolution but still needs to build conviction.

 

Applying the Framework to an Example

A few years back, McKinsey applied the SCR framework to the United States Postal
Service (here). The story elements are as follows:

 1. The stable era
    From 2003 to 2006, the USPS reported cumulative profits of nearly $10
    billion.
 2. The discovery of a major problem
    Starting in 2007 through (then) present (mid-2010), the USPS began
    experiencing unprecedented losses
 3. The identification of the root causes
    The recent (2007-2010) losses have been due to (a) volume declines (b)
    increased retiree health benefit funding requirements (c) lower than
    expected cost savings
 4. The projected impact should the root causes not be addressed
    If the USPS does not act, the losses will only get worse due to megatrends,
    regulations, and competitive forces. Specifically, (a) e-diversion will
    accelerate volume decline (b) growing competition will cap price increases
    (c) legal and regulatory requirements that require is to fund retiree
    benefits and to provide universal delivery service.
 5. The plan to solve the problem by addressing the root causes
    USPS must do four things: (1) Drive revenue through premium services x, y, z
    (2) Increase productivity by a, b, c (3) Pursue legislative reform (4)
    Reduce costs by cutting delivery from 6 to 5 days per week.
 6. The result of the attempt to solve the problem
    Despite billions in cost reductions, losses continue to mount due to (a)
    legal restrictions on pricing, (b) necessary service diversification, and
    (c) operations required to provide secure, reliable and affordable postal
    services to the nation, for example, an increasing number of delivery
    points.
 7. The plan to address remaining issues, if any, from the attempt to solve the
    problem
    The USPS will continue to execute the plan as expressed in (5) above.

McKinsey’s actual presentation on the USPS, an audience deeply knowledgeable
about the problem and its root causes, included the following story elements:

S = 1 + 2 + 3
C = 4
R = 5

 

Additional Points

 * Recall, the situation is the framing of the important, recent context the
   audience already knows and accepts as fact. The word “important” means the
   primary (most senior) decision maker in the room will deem the situation to
   have an impact on the way she measures success, aka her “True North.” She
   cares about that measure(s) as well as its strategic levers. For most
   executives, success is some combination of (i) increasing revenue (ii)
   lowering cost (iii) reducing risk (iv) reducing effort.  Increasing revenue
   generally comes from selling existing products to existing customers
   (upsell/cross-sell), selling existing products to new customers (often via
   new distribution channels), or bringing new products to market that you sell
   to existing (also cross-sell) or new customers.
 * Though you may only present one resolution (which may have multiple phases),
   strive to discover it by first enumerating than prioritizing a set of
   mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive (MECE) ways of solving the
   problem.
 * A strong resolution includes (a) what need to be done (b) how it will be done
   (c) when it will be done, and (d) by whom it will be done. Moreover, the
   resolution should include concrete milestones by which progress & success
   will be measured. Finally, the resolution should include side-benefits and
   expected consequences (with containment plans were applicable).
 * I have not delved into how to express the SCR framework in a presentation.
   For that, you’ll need to read Strategic Storytelling by Dave McKinsey.
   However, one major principle is that the sections representing each S, C, or
   R component should be built traversing an issue tree. For more on that, read
   this.

 

Concrete Examples

 1. USPS (source)

 * S: USPS is experiencing unprecedented losses due to (a) volume declines (b)
   increased retiree health benefit funding requirements (c) lower than expected
   cost savings
 * C: If we do not do anything, the losses will only get worse due to
   megatrends, regulations, and competitive forces. Specifically, (a)
   e-diversion will accelerate volume decline (b) growing competition will cap
   price increases (c) legal and regulatory requirements that require is to fund
   retiree benefits and to provide universal delivery service.
 * R: USPS must do four things: (1) Drive revenue through premium services x, y,
   z (2) Increase productivity by a, b, c (3) Pursue legislative reform (4)
   Reduce costs by cutting delivery from 6 to 5 days per week

 2. Global steel industry (source)

 * S: The global steel industry is not financially sustainable as evidenced by
   (a) negative cash flows (b) increasing debt leverage (c) deteriorating EBITDA
 * C: The outlook remains challenging since the EBITDA margin range will remain
   lower than in the past.
 * R: Significant restructuring is required, esp. through (a) capacity reduction
   (b) increased product differentiation

 3. Addressing the global affordable housing challenge (source)

 * S: There is a housing affordability gap, esp. in low income countries.
 * C: Four levers can narrow the gap: (a) land (b) development (c) operations
   and maintenance (d) financing
 * R: The easiest lever to pull is financing via x, y, and z.

 4. Commercial Payments in Asia-Pacific (source)

 * S: Asia-Pacific commercial payments are growing at a fast rate due to [root
   causes] of (a) account growth (b) electronic payment transaction growth. At
   least in theory, there is a lot of room to grow.
 * C: However, there are
   * 5 roadblocks (1) lack of common standards for e-billing (2) fragmented b2b
     automation value chain (3) unclear new revenue streams for incumbents (4)
     large informal SME economy (5) insufficient focus from leading players
   * 8 paradigm shifts (1) improving customer willingness to go digital (2)
     growth of Asia-linked trade (3) technology convergence, standards, and 3rd
     party platforms (4) … [see source slide 16]
 * R: Government & financial services firms, and commercial players must combine
   forces to enable the development of platforms to sustain growth.

 5. China Retail Banking (source)

 * S: The retail bank market in China is profitable at 15% EBIT and is rapidly
   growing at a 12% CAGR.
 * C: However, Pioneer Bank is poorly positioned to share in this growing profit
   pool.
 * R: Pioneer needs to acquire Shanghai Bank and invest $60 million in building
   capabilities to establish a winning position.

 6. Smart phones (source)

 * S: Technology advancements has enabled touch screens, mobile internet, high
   resolution etc.
 * C: Consumers need cellphones with more capabilities.
 * R: Introduce smartphone that enables the consumer to have one device for all
   purposes.

 7. Sustaining growth (source)

 * S: The company is growing its business at a healthy rate.
 * C: But we are having trouble keeping up in recruiting good candidates and are
   we in danger of ‘dumbing down’ by hiring who’s available rather than who’s
   best
 * R: I think we need to make greater use of consultants and agency staff whilst
   we sustain hiring standards and develop our ability to hire great staff.

 8. Inventory (source)

 * S: For the last 6 months, our inventory has been above the minimum threshold.
 * C: However, this month we dipped below the threshold due to (a) unexpectedly
   strong demand that is expected to continue (b) production problems that will
   intensify given the age of our factory.
 * R: We will fix the inventory problem in two phases. First, we will solve the
   problem in the short-term by increasing production with our contract
   manufacturing partner.  Second, we will accelerate our plan to build a new,
   larger factory.

 

Sources & References

https://www.slideshare.net/interviewcoach/the-mckinsey-approach-to-problem-solving-pdf?

http://elc-columbia.weebly.com/uploads/3/9/7/2/39724566/how_to_do_consulting_presentations__elc_.pdf

http://www.richardhare.com/2007/09/03/the-minto-pyramid-principle-scqa/

http://changingminds.org/techniques/speaking/preparing_presentation/scqa.htm

http://www.sollerthoughts.com/2009/11/21/using-the-minto-pyramid-principle-scqa-technique-for-effective-storytelling-presentation/

https://about.usps.com/future-postal-service/mckinsey-usps-future-bus-model2.pdf

http://www.oecd.org/sti/ind/Laying%20the%20foundations%20for%20a%20financially%20sound%20industry%20-%20OECD.pdf

http://pubdocs.worldbank.org/en/773591464879251915/housing-finance-conference2016-session-1-presentations.pdf


SHARE THIS:

 * Share
 * 

 * LinkedIn
 * Twitter
 * 
 * Facebook
 * 

Filed Under: Content


5 MOST POPULAR THE MOTH STORIES BY WOMEN

Posted on March 29, 2015 Written by jdonovan 1 Comment

A little while back, I posted an article featuring the “10 Most Popular The
Moth Stories of All Time.”  While these talks are entertaining and inspiring,
many readers justifiably commented that ten out of ten were male.  By any
measure, is that acceptable? The short answer is NO!

One way this could happen is if The Moth only featured male speakers.  To figure
out if that were the case, I counted the gender of each speaker. Of the 216
videos posted, 37% (80 videos) are of female speakers.  By sheer averages, with
all else being equal, one would expect at least three or four of the most
popular videos to feature women.  (Note: It did seem that the male/female mix
 has become a bit more balanced over time.  Since older videos tend to have more
views since they have been around longer, this explains some but not all of the
discrepancy.)

To see if The Moth is an aberration, I next looked at TED Talks.  As I write
this, 3 of the 10 most viewed on YouTube feature women – Amy Cuddy, Cameron
Russell, and Pamela Meyer. Does that make sense?  For an apples to apples
comparison, I sorted TED Talks on YouTube from oldest to newest and classified
speakers by gender for the first 216 and found 19% (40 videos) feature female
speakers.  So, expecting at least 20%, the TED top 10 statistic of 30% female
seems to make sense. Moreover, it refutes a possible theory that male talks are
more viral than female talks.

Of course, it remains odd that women are underrepresented in The Moth and in TED
Talks.  The root cause could be manifold including gender-self-selection for
public speaking (Do men tend to ‘put themselves out there’ more than women?) or
gender-bias in selection.  One would have to see the applicant data to figure
this out. Research conducted by David Brooks on the Toastmasters World
Championship of Public Speaking – whose winners are nearly always male –
provides some insight.  David found that relatively few women enter the contest
to begin with suggesting that gender-self-selection has a bigger impact than
gender-bias.  This likely explains what is going on with TED. As a TEDx
organizer, I can confirm that it was much harder to find women and minority
speakers as compared to caucasian males. I have to believe many PhD theses could
be written on the nature/genetic and nurture/cultural influences behind this
phenomenon.

While I remain somewhat puzzled as to why women remain under-represented in the
most popular The Moth stories, perhaps I can help a little by sharing the 5 most
popular The Moth Stories featuring women speakers.  Happily, the first video,
featuring Kimberly Reed, has cracked the top-ten most viewed as #9 overall.

#1 The Moth Presents Kimberly Reed: Life Flight



 

#2 The Moth Presents Elna Baker: Yes Means Yes?



 

#3 The Moth Presents Ophira Eisenberg: The Accident



 

#4 The Moth Presents Starlee Kine: Radical Honesty



 

#5 The Moth Presents Jenifer Hixson: Where There’s Smoke



 

 


SHARE THIS:

 * Share
 * 

 * LinkedIn
 * Twitter
 * 
 * Facebook
 * 

Filed Under: Odds and Ends


2 OUTSTANDING BUSINESS STORYTELLING VIDEOS

Posted on September 3, 2014 Written by jdonovan 1 Comment

1. Summary of the Minto Pyramid Principle by Harrison Metal
http://vimeo.com/87537935   2. Summary of Robert McKee's Storytelling Principles
by Harrison Metal http://vimeo.com/87513353     … [Continue reading]

Filed Under: Content


TOASTMASTERS PODCAST: HOW TO DELIVER A TED TALK

Posted on July 25, 2014 Written by jdonovan 0 Comments

I recently had the opportunity to do an interview with Bo Bennett, co-host of
the Toastmasters Podcast. Click the image to access the free audio. … [Continue
reading]

Filed Under: Odds and Ends


BOOK REVIEW: SCREENWRITING – THE SEQUENCE APPROACH (PAUL JOSEPH GULINO)

Posted on May 21, 2014 Written by jdonovan 0 Comments

The premise of this book is that big films are made up of little films called
sequences, each lasting 8 to 15 minutes. Each sequence consists of three parts:
setup/beginning/situation, development/rising action/complication, and partial
resolution.  … [Continue reading]

Filed Under: Content


MCKINSEY PRESENTATION TIPS – GENE ZELAZNY AT WHARTON

Posted on May 20, 2014 Written by jdonovan 1 Comment

In the Spring of 2001, McKinsey presentation guru Gene Zelazny shared public
speaking insights gleaned over his forty-plus year career (video at bottom of
post).  Here, I have summarized his very well structured tips:   Prologue: 1.
The only … [Continue reading]

Filed Under: Content, Delivery, Design

 * 1
 * 2
 * 3
 * …
 * 12
 * Next Page »

TOP POSTS & PAGES

 * How to Tell a Business Story Using the McKinsey
   Situation-Complication-Resolution (SCR) Framework
 * 10 Most Popular The Moth Stories Of All Time
 * How To Win A Toastmasters Speech Evaluation Contest
 * 10 Public Speaking Tips For Making Eye Contact
 * How To Speak Behind A Lectern

Copyright © 2022 · Focus Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in