stm.bookpi.org
Open in
urlscan Pro
172.105.51.76
Public Scan
Submitted URL: http://stm.bookpi.org:443/NFMMR-V6/article/view/2766
Effective URL: https://stm.bookpi.org/NFMMR-V6/article/view/2766
Submission: On August 01 via api from IL — Scanned from IL
Effective URL: https://stm.bookpi.org/NFMMR-V6/article/view/2766
Submission: On August 01 via api from IL — Scanned from IL
Form analysis
1 forms found in the DOMPOST https://stm.bookpi.org/NFMMR-V6/search/search
<form class="navbar-form navbar-right" action="https://stm.bookpi.org/NFMMR-V6/search/search" method="post" role="search">
<input type="hidden" name="csrfToken" value="d90673023cc74d3c7b5bf1ea04bca022">
<div class="form-group searchBox">
<input name="query" class="form-control" placeholder="Search" value="" type="text" aria-label="Search Query">
<button type="submit" class="btn btn-default "> <span class="fa fa-search " aria-hidden="true"></span> </button>
</div>
<span class="adv-search"><a href="https://stm.bookpi.org/NFMMR-V6/search/search">Advanced Search</a></span>
</form>
Text Content
NEW FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE AND MEDICAL RESEARCH VOL. 6 * Home * About * Books * Testimonials * Editors * Charges * Submission * Contact Advanced Search 1. Home 2. Books 3. New Frontiers in Medicine and Medical Research Vol. 6 4. Chapters A DILEMMA FOR MODERN OBSTETRICS -RISING INCIDENCE OF CAESAREAN SECTION RATE Zahra Safdar Sumera Zaib New Frontiers in Medicine and Medical Research Vol. 6, 2 August 2021 , Page 56-63 https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/nfmmr/v6/3796F Published: 2021-08-02 * View Article * Cite * Statistics * Share ABSTRACT Objectives: To study the rate of caesarean sections (indications, ratio in emergency and elective caesarean sections) the percentage of vaginal birth after caesarean sections and instrumental deliveries. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted over a period of one year from 1st January 2018 to 31st December 2018 at the Department of obstetrics and gynaecology, unit 2, Lahore general hospital, Lahore. The data of obstetrical patients who got admitted in the unit and were delivered either vaginally or through abdominal route during the defined study period was recorded and a statistical analysis of various parameters namely the caesarean section rates, its indications, the ratio of emergency and elective caesarean sections, the rate of vaginal births after caesarean section (VBACS) and instrumental deliveries was done. Results: The total numbers of obstetrical patients admitted over the study period were 18183. Out of which total deliveries were 6602, vaginal births were 3699 and caesarean sections were 2765. The overall caesarean section rate was 41.88%, elective sections were 473(17.1%) and emergency sections were 2292(82.89%). The vaginal births were 3699(56.02%), VBACS were 98(2.6%), instrumental deliveries like forcep deliveries were 31(0.8%) and ventouse deliveries were 47(1.2%). There were 38(1.02%) twin deliveries and 59(1.5%) assisted breech deliveries. The caesarean sections done electively as well as in emergency with different indications were calculated individually. Conclusions: The rising incidence of caesarean section is most pressing fact of the decade in modern obstetrics. The detailed audit of the caesarean sections done over a year in a tertiary care hospital showed a large number of sections done due to fetal distress. The confirmation of its diagnosis to prevent unnecessary surgeries is pivotal. The previous scars and indications related to them are the most important component in the study so concluding this study to take steps in prevention of primary caesarean section is foremost. Audit and surveillance of caesarean sections should be carried out annually to identify the preventable causes of caesarean sections. Keywords: * Caesarean section * indications * vaginal births * statistical analysis * tertiary care hospital HOW TO CITE Safdar, Z. ., & Zaib, S. . (2021). A Dilemma for Modern Obstetrics -Rising Incidence of Caesarean Section Rate . New Frontiers in Medicine and Medical Research Vol. 6, 56–63. https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/nfmmr/v6/3796F More Citation Formats * ACM * ACS * APA * ABNT * Chicago * Harvard * IEEE * MLA * Turabian * Vancouver * Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) * BibTeX 0 CITATIONS 0 Total citations 0 Recent citations n/a Field Citation Ratio n/a Relative Citation Ratio -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Plum Print visual indicator of research metrics No metrics available. - see details * Linkedin * Twitter * Facebook * WhatsApp * Telegram © B P International