www.politico.com Open in urlscan Pro
2606:4700:4400::6812:29fb  Public Scan

Form analysis
2 forms found in the DOM

GET https://www.politico.com/search

<form class="slide-search__form" action="https://www.politico.com/search" method="get">
  <input class="slide-search__input" type="search" name="q" id="searchTerm" aria-label="Search for any story" placeholder="Enter search term...">
  <button class="slide-search__run" type="submit" aria-label="Start search"><b class="bt-icon bt-icon--search"></b><span class="icon-text">Search</span></button>
  <button class="slide-search__close" id="search-close" type="button"><b class="bt-icon bt-icon--close" aria-label="Close Search"></b></button>
</form>

<form class="form-section">
  <input type="hidden" name="subscribeId" value="0000014f-1646-d88f-a1cf-5f46b7bd0000">
  <input type="hidden" name="processorId" value="00000179-61ab-d60d-a9f9-f5bf392e0000">
  <input type="hidden" name="validateEmail" value="true">
  <input type="hidden" name="enhancedSignUp" value="true">
  <input type="hidden" name="bot-field" value="" class="dn">
  <input type="hidden" name="subscriptionModule" value="newsletter_inline_standard_Playbook - POLITICO" class="dn">
  <input type="hidden" name="captchaUserToken" value="" autocomplete="off">
  <input type="hidden" name="captchaPublicKey" value="6LfS6L8UAAAAAAHCPhd7CF66ZbK8AyFfk3MslbKV" autocomplete="off">
  <div class="sign-up-21--msg sign-up-21--msg-spinner" aria-hidden="true">
    <div class="msg-content">
      <p>Loading</p>
      <svg class="sign-up-21--msg-icon-lg sign-up-21--spinner-icon-lg" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="48" height="48" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="#4D8AD2" stroke-width="1" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round">
        <line x1="12" y1="2" x2="12" y2="6"></line>
        <line x1="12" y1="18" x2="12" y2="22"></line>
        <line x1="4.93" y1="4.93" x2="7.76" y2="7.76"></line>
        <line x1="16.24" y1="16.24" x2="19.07" y2="19.07"></line>
        <line x1="2" y1="12" x2="6" y2="12"></line>
        <line x1="18" y1="12" x2="22" y2="12"></line>
        <line x1="4.93" y1="19.07" x2="7.76" y2="16.24"></line>
        <line x1="16.24" y1="7.76" x2="19.07" y2="4.93"></line>
      </svg>
    </div>
  </div>
  <div class="sign-up-21--msg sign-up-21--msg-completed" aria-live="assertive" aria-hidden="true">
    <div class="msg-content">
      <p>You will now start receiving email updates</p>
      <svg class="sign-up-21--msg-icon-lg" width="48" height="48" viewBox="0 0 48 48" fill="none" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
        <path
          d="M44 22.1597V23.9997C43.9975 28.3126 42.601 32.5091 40.0187 35.9634C37.4363 39.4177 33.8066 41.9447 29.6707 43.1675C25.5349 44.3904 21.1145 44.2435 17.0689 42.7489C13.0234 41.2543 9.56931 38.4919 7.22192 34.8739C4.87453 31.2558 3.75958 26.9759 4.04335 22.6724C4.32712 18.3689 5.99441 14.2724 8.79656 10.9939C11.5987 7.71537 15.3856 5.43049 19.5924 4.48002C23.7992 3.52955 28.2005 3.9644 32.14 5.71973"
          stroke="#4D8AD2" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"></path>
        <path d="M44 8L24 28.02L18 22.02" stroke="#4D8AD2" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"></path>
      </svg>
    </div>
  </div>
  <div class="sign-up-21--msg sign-up-21--msg-already-subscribed" aria-live="assertive" aria-hidden="true">
    <div class="msg-content">
      <p>You are already subscribed</p>
      <svg class="sign-up-21--msg-icon-lg" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="48" height="48" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="1" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round">
        <path d="M14 9V5a3 3 0 0 0-3-3l-4 9v11h11.28a2 2 0 0 0 2-1.7l1.38-9a2 2 0 0 0-2-2.3zM7 22H4a2 2 0 0 1-2-2v-7a2 2 0 0 1 2-2h3"></path>
      </svg>
      <a href="/newsletters" target="_top"></a>
    </div>
  </div>
  <div class="sign-up-21--msg sign-up-21--msg-error" aria-live="assertive" aria-hidden="true">
    <div class="sign-up-21--msg-close">
      <svg width="20" height="20" viewBox="0 0 20 20" fill="none" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
        <path id="close" fill-rule="evenodd" clip-rule="evenodd"
          d="M17.513 16.6291L10.8839 9.99995L17.513 3.37082L16.6291 2.48694L10 9.11606L3.37088 2.48694L2.487 3.37082L9.11613 9.99995L2.487 16.6291L3.37088 17.513L10 10.8838L16.6291 17.513L17.513 16.6291Z" fill="#000"></path>
      </svg>
    </div>
    <div class="msg-content">
      <p style="color:#9E352C">Something went wrong</p>
    </div>
  </div>
  <fieldset class="form-container active">
    <div class="form-row row-email">
      <div class="form-row-container">
        <label class="data-form-label" for="email" aria-hidden="true">Email</label>
        <span class="sign-up-21--error-msg" aria-hidden="true">
          <span class="sign-up-21--exclamation">!</span>
          <span id="email-hint">Please make sure that the email address you typed in is valid</span>
        </span>
        <div class="form-row-container--input">
          <input type="email" name="subscribeEmail" aria-label="Email" placeholder="Your Email" required="">
        </div>
      </div>
    </div>
    <div class="form-row row-secondary-questions active">
      <div class="sign-up-21--secondary-questions-container">
        <div class="form-row-container">
          <label class="data-form-label" aria-hidden="true">Employer</label>
          <div class="form-row-container--input">
            <input type="text" name="job_employer" required="" aria-label="Employer" placeholder="Employer">
          </div>
        </div>
        <div class="form-row-container">
          <label class="data-form-label" aria-hidden="true">Job Title</label>
          <div class="form-row-container--input">
            <input type="text" name="job_title" required="" aria-label="Job Title" placeholder="Job Title">
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </div>
    <div class="form-row row-notice">
      <span class="sign-up-21--notice">
        <span class="color-red">*</span> All fields must be completed to subscribe. </span>
      <button type="submit" class="submit-button" aria-disabled="true">Sign Up</button>
    </div>
    <div class="row-bottom">
      <p class="form-policy"> By signing up, you acknowledge and agree to our <a href="https://www.politico.com/privacy" target="_blank">Privacy Policy</a> and <a href="https://www.politico.com/terms-of-service" target="_blank">Terms of Service</a>.
        You may unsubscribe at any time by following the directions at the bottom of the email or by <a href="https://www.politico.com/feedback" target="_blank">contacting us here</a>. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
        <a href="https://policies.google.com/privacy" target="_blank">Privacy Policy</a> and <a href="https://policies.google.com/terms" target="_blank">Terms of Service</a> apply. </p>
      <button type="submit" class="submit-button" aria-disabled="true"> Sign Up </button>
    </div>
  </fieldset>
</form>

Text Content

Skip to Main Content


POLITICO POLITICO LOGO

 * Congress
 * Pro
 * E&E News
 * Search
   Search


WASHINGTON & POLITICS

 * Congress
 * White House
 * Elections
 * Legal
 * Magazine
 * Foreign Affairs


2024 ELECTIONS

 * News
 * Results
 * GOP Candidate Tracker


STATE POLITICS & POLICY

 * California
 * Florida
 * New Jersey
 * New York


GLOBAL POLITICS & POLICY

 * Brussels
 * Canada
 * United Kingdom


POLICY NEWS

 * Agriculture
 * Cannabis
 * Cybersecurity
 * Defense
 * Education
 * Energy & Environment
 * Finance & Tax
 * Health Care
 * Immigration
 * Labor
 * Sustainability
 * Technology
 * Trade
 * Transportation


NEWSLETTERS

 * Playbook
 * Playbook PM
 * West Wing Playbook
 * POLITICO Nightly
 * POLITICO Weekend
 * The Recast
 * Huddle
 * All Newsletters


COLUMNISTS

 * Alex Burns
 * John Harris
 * Jonathan Martin
 * Michael Schaffer
 * Jack Shafer
 * Rich Lowry


SERIES & MORE

 * Breaking News Alerts
 * Podcasts
 * Video
 * The Fifty
 * Women Rule
 * Matt Wuerker Cartoons
 * Cartoon Carousel


POLITICO LIVE

 * Upcoming Events
 * Previous Events


FOLLOW US

 * Twitter
 * Instagram
 * Facebook

 * My Account
 * Log In Log Out



Health Care


MENTAL HOSPITALS WAREHOUSED THE SICK. CONGRESS WANTS TO LET THEM TRY AGAIN.

Lawmakers are on the verge of allowing Medicaid to cover substance use treatment
in the facilities.



Homeless people and their belongings on a San Francisco street in November. |
Jason Henry/AFP via Getty Images

By Carmen Paun

01/01/2024 07:00 AM EST

 * 
 * 

 * * Link Copied
 * * 
   * 
   * 

The linked crises of drug addiction and homelessness have Washington on the
verge of embracing a health care provider it once repudiated: the mental
hospital.

Nearly 60 years after Congress barred Medicaid from treating people in what were
then derided as insane asylums, lawmakers are on the verge of reversing course.



The reasons: Community-based care championed since the 1960s hasn’t stopped
record overdoses — and constituents have had it with the brazen drug use and
tent encampments in their cities. Some public health advocates agree that times
have changed and the magnitude of the crises justifies lifting the rule.



“It is no longer the 1960s, and there is no longer the same stigma against the
treatment of mental health,” said GOP Rep. Michael Burgess, a doctor
representing Dallas’ affluent northern suburbs who sponsored a House bill to
change the rule.

The House passed it Dec. 12. It would give states the option to treat Medicaid
patients suffering from addiction for up to a month in a mental hospital on the
government’s dime. The Senate Finance Committee approved a similar provision in
November, so its prospects of enactment are good.

Burgess’ co-sponsor was Ritchie Torres, a Democrat from New York City’s poorest
section, the South Bronx, who has spent time in the hospital for his own mental
health struggles.

Public health groups including the Treatment Advocacy Center and the National
Alliance on Mental Illness, as well as state Medicaid directors, support the
change.

They say the 1965 rule barring Medicaid, the federal-state health care program
for the poor and lower-middle income, from funding hospital treatment has had
unintended consequences: a lack of psychiatric beds for people who need them.
Instead, they said, many vulnerable people end up on the streets, in emergency
rooms, in jails or dead.

They say the policy also perpetuates discrimination against people who suffer
from drug addiction and mental illness compared to those with physical
conditions, for which there’s no such exclusion.

Republicans in Congress agree. Democrats are divided.

New Jersey Rep. Frank Pallone, the top Democrat on the Energy and Commerce
Committee that shepherded the bill, resisted the change, wary of a return to
institutionalizing people with mental illness instead of caring for them in
their homes, ideally, with a team of specialized health and social workers.

“We know that one of the best ways to help people in recovery is to ensure they
have access to care in their communities,” he said.

Pallone ultimately relented because Republicans agreed to improve Medicaid
coverage for some incarcerated people with substance use disorder.

A police car leaves a psychiatric hospital in Washington in September 2016. |
Preston Keres/AFP via Getty Images

But fears of reinstitutionalization have also animated civil rights advocates
who support the restriction on Medicaid funds. They fear a slippery slope back
to warehousing the sick and point to states like California and New York that
are already experimenting with forcing patients into care.




Lifting the Medicaid rule would reduce pressure to do what’s really needed, said
Lewis Bossing, senior staff attorney at the Bazelon Center for Mental Health
Law: increase services in communities.

“People have better outcomes in terms of reduced hospitalization rates, reduced
criminal legal system involvement, increased employment, increased measures of
social integration when they’re served in the community, … versus having to be
at an institution to get care,” he said.


THE RISE AND FALL OF THE MENTAL HOSPITAL

States started building mental health hospitals in the 1800s, aiming to provide
people with severe mental illness with care instead of throwing them in jail.

But the hospitals soon became overcrowded, understaffed and underfinanced. Abuse
was rife, according to an investigation published in Life Magazine in 1946:
Patients were restrained for days, thrown into solitary confinement, starved and
sometimes beaten to death.

More than half a million people were in state mental health hospitals in 1963,
half of them in facilities housing more than 3,000 people, President John F.
Kennedy said in a speech that year.

Kennedy laid out a plan for states to build comprehensive community mental
health centers, with federal support. They would combine diagnostic services,
emergency psychiatric units, inpatient and outpatient services and
rehabilitation.

The law establishing Medicaid two years later prohibited federal money from
paying for care in mental health care facilities with more than 16 beds to avoid
pouring money into what Kennedy called outdated institutional care. The rule now
covers people between 21 and 64 years old.

Many state hospitals closed but the community mental health system, as Kennedy
envisioned it, never came to fruition, advocates on both sides of the debate
say.

Those who don’t want the Medicaid funding ban repealed would like states and the
federal government to focus on building that system, while those who want to see
the policy gone say both community and hospital care are needed to provide
people with what they need, depending on their circumstances.

A person diagnosed with mental illness and substance use disorder needs
inpatient care for doctors to stabilize them, argued Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.),
a gastroenterologist and top member of the two committees with power over the
policy.

“The people who were so opposed to this because they still want to do it in an
outpatient [facility], you wonder if they’ve ever actually lived with somebody
who is seriously psychotic,” Cassidy said.

Advocates argue that repealing the Medicaid policy is needed to provide people
with the best treatment options. | Olivier Douliery/AFP via Getty Images

Over the last decade, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has started
allowing states to use federal dollars to pay for care in mental health
hospitals for a limited time, as long as they obtain a waiver. Thirty-six states
now have a waiver to treat people with substance use disorder and a dozen states
have a waiver for treating other mental illnesses in psychiatric hospitals.


MOST READ


 1. JOHN ROBERTS WEIGHS IN ON AI, IGNORES LOOMING TRUMP CASES


 2. IN RARE APOLOGY, ISRAELI MINISTER SAYS SHE ‘SINNED’ FOR HER ROLE IN REFORMS
    THAT TORE COUNTRY APART


 3. WHAT IS VICTORY FOR JOE BIDEN IN NEW HAMPSHIRE?


 4. BUSES OF MIGRANTS BOARDING TRAINS FROM NJ TO NYC, OFFICIALS SAY


 5. WHY FEARS ABOUT BIDEN’S MARIJUANA MOVES ARE OVERBLOWN



California found that its waiver to provide medication-assisted treatment for
people with substance use disorder in mental hospitals helped individuals “who
need a relatively intensive level of care for short-term stabilization of acute
needs,” said Ann Carroll, the California Department of Health Care Services’
spokesperson.

Even so, the system as it stands is failing to provide state-of-the-art care to
many patients. One-third of the 1.5 million Medicaid enrollees with opioid use
disorder, for example, did not receive medication treatment in 2021, according
to the HHS inspector general.

The 2018 SUPPORT Act, a landmark law meant to provide prevention, treatment and
recovery for people with opioid addiction, gave states a new, albeit temporary,
choice to provide care in psychiatric hospitals for up to a month without having
to obtain a waiver.

That option, which only South Dakota and Tennessee have taken, expired in
September. The SUPPORT Act reauthorization bill the House passed in mid-December
would reup the option and make it permanent.

Pallone argued at a House Energy and Commerce hearing this summer that the low
uptake showed that the waivers were sufficient. But Burgess and other
Republicans said the waivers were burdensome and that making the option
permanent would incentivize more states to use it.

The Senate Finance Committee also voted in November to make the option
permanent. Sen. Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.), who introduced the legislation with
Republican Sens. John Thune of South Dakota and Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee,
emphasized the 30-day limit and the requirement to provide medication. She
described medication treatment — using drugs like buprenorphine to wean patients
off stronger opioids — as “the gold standard for treating addiction.”

It’s a rare issue on which Republicans aren’t at odds with the public health
establishment.

A repeal of the funding ban wouldn’t mean a return to the 1965 mental health
care model “because that is just not where the system is today, that’s not where
the clinical understanding is today and that’s not where any of the conversation
is today,” said Jack Rollins, the director of federal policy at the National
Association of Medicaid Directors.





FORCED CARE AND THE SLIPPERY SLOPE

But there’s still a powerful perception among many in the public that mental
hospitals are akin to prisons and that opening the door to voluntary care will
lead to forced treatment.

When some people think of mental hospitals, they see the one in “One Flew Over
the Cuckoo’s Nest,” the 1962 novel by Ken Kesey, or its 1975 film adaptation in
which Jack Nicholson played a patient who was saner than the nurse caring for
him.

“A faulty assumption is that [mental health institutions] are like therapeutic
settings. We know there’s a history in this country of institutions not being
particularly therapeutic places,” Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law’s Bossing
said.

He pointed to reports in recent years from Washington’s disability rights
watchdog alleging abuse and neglect at one public and one private mental health
hospital in the capital. Representatives of the institutions said they were
investigating the accusations and would make changes if necessary.




In 2021, Virginia announced and quickly reversed a decision to close five of the
state’s eight psychiatric hospitals to new admissions due to overcrowding and
understaffing.

And reinstitutionalization, albeit on a small scale, is happening.

New York has sent about 130 people per week, involuntarily, to hospitals for
psychiatric evaluation since May as part of a plan by Mayor Eric Adams to treat
people who are unable to meet their basic needs.

On the other side of the country, California Gov. Gavin Newsom has included ways
to compel people into care in his mental health system overhaul. In March,
Californians will decide on a $6.4 billion bond proposal Newsom has pitched to
build nearly 25,000 psychiatric and addiction beds.

Representatives of community mental health organizations in California plan to
oppose the changes.

In New York City, a group of civil rights lawyers filed a class-action suit
against Adams’ directive and want more data on its implementation to see whether
it’s disproportionately affecting people of color.

Opponents of New York City Mayor Eric Adams' plan to involuntarily send mentally
ill homeless people to psychiatric hospitals protest in front of City Hall in
December 2022. | Spencer Platt/Getty Images


WEIGHING THE POLITICS

Still, Newsom and Adams are reacting to growing public and political pressure
caused by a massive crisis of homelessness and drug addiction.

Drug use spiked during the Covid pandemic, as evidenced by the record levels of
fatal overdoses — now more than 100,000 a year.

Homelessness rose by 12 percent between 2022 and 2023 nationwide as rents surged
and pandemic-era aid ended. More than 650,000 people were experiencing
homelessness on a single night in January 2023, according to the Department of
Housing and Urban Development.

California is home to the most unhoused people of any state — some 181,000
people — followed by New York, with some 103,000.

Politicians fear open-air drug markets and tent encampments in their cities
could hurt them at election time.

And they’re increasingly confident that caring for more of those suffering on
the streets in mental hospitals won’t become a similar political liability.

“It doesn’t have to become a warehouse, you know, ‘One Flew Over a Cuckoo’s
Nest’. Absolutely not. That’s wrong, it should not happen,” Cassidy said.


 * Filed under:
 * Congress,
 * Mental Health,
 * Frank Pallone,
 * Marsha Blackburn,
 * John Thune,
 * Gavin Newsom,
 * Maggie Hassan,
 * Bill Cassidy,
 * Michael Burgess,
 * Drug Addiction,
 * Homelessness,
 * Ritchie Torres,
 * Eric Adams


POLITICO
 * 
 * 

 * * Link Copied
 * * 
   * 
   * 


PLAYBOOK

The unofficial guide to official Washington, every morning and weekday
afternoons.


Playbook

The unofficial guide to official Washington, every morning and weekday
afternoons.

By signing up, you acknowledge and agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of
Service. You may unsubscribe at any time by following the directions at the
bottom of the email or by contacting us here. This site is protected by
reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Loading

You will now start receiving email updates

You are already subscribed

Something went wrong

Email ! Please make sure that the email address you typed in is valid

Employer

Job Title

* All fields must be completed to subscribe. Sign Up

By signing up, you acknowledge and agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of
Service. You may unsubscribe at any time by following the directions at the
bottom of the email or by contacting us here. This site is protected by
reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Sign Up

Sponsored
Continue watching

Repurposing coal plants into more sustainable solar farms
SPONSORED CONTENT

Recommended by

 * About Us
 * Advertising
 * Breaking News Alerts
 * Careers
 * Credit Card Payments
 * Digital Edition
 * FAQ
 * Feedback
 * Headlines
 * Photos
 * POWERJobs
 * Press
 * Print Subscriptions
 * Request A Correction
 * Write For Us
 * RSS
 * Site Map

 * Terms of Service
 * Privacy Policy
 * Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information and Opt Out of Targeted
   Advertising

© 2024 POLITICO LLC




COOKIE SETTINGS

At this time, only residents from certain U.S. States have the right to opt-out.
To disable cookies, please use your device settings. You can learn more about
our privacy practices by reading our Privacy Policy


COOKIES

FUNCTIONAL COOKIES

Functional Cookies

These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and
personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose
services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then some
or all of these services may not function properly.

 * STRICTLY NECESSARY COOKIES
   
   Always Active
   
   These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be
   switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions
   made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your
   privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser
   to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will
   not then work.

ADVERTISING, ANALYTICS, FUNCTIONAL AND PERFORMANCE COOKIES

Advertising, Analytics, Functional and Performance Cookies



Back Button


COOKIE LIST



Search Icon
Filter Icon

Clear
checkbox label label
Apply Cancel
Consent Leg.Interest
checkbox label label
checkbox label label
checkbox label label

Confirm My Choices