www.cambridge.org
Open in
urlscan Pro
104.17.110.190
Public Scan
URL:
https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/factfinding-before-the-international-court-of-justice/5F9C25D1D13BCF831548621BF5948AA4
Submission: On December 23 via api from US — Scanned from US
Submission: On December 23 via api from US — Scanned from US
Form analysis 5 forms found in the DOM
GET /core/books/factfinding-before-the-international-court-of-justice/5F9C25D1D13BCF831548621BF5948AA4/listing
<form action="/core/books/factfinding-before-the-international-court-of-justice/5F9C25D1D13BCF831548621BF5948AA4/listing" method="GET" class="search-form">
<div class="row">
<div class="columns">
<div class="row collapse postfix-radius search-input js-outglow-parent">
<div class="small-10 columns">
<div role="status" aria-live="polite" class="announce-result">
</div>
<input type="text" name="q" value="" autocomplete="off" class=" js-outglow prefix-radius mb-0" placeholder="Search in this book
" aria-label="" data-sr-label="search term">
<div class="search-full-text ">
<input type="hidden" name="fts" id="ftsHeader" value="yes">
<label>
<span class="checkbox-wrapper">
<input type="checkbox" id="ftsCheckbox" value="yes" checked="" class="styled"><span></span>
</span>
<span class="label-text">Search within full text</span>
</label>
<script>
$(document).ready(function() {
var $fts = $('#ftsHeader');
var sidebarFTSCheckbox = document.getElementById('fts');
var ariaLabelText = 'Search within full text checkbox';
$('#ftsCheckbox').on('change', function(e) {
$fts.val(e.target.checked ? 'yes' : 'no');
$(this).attr('aria-label', e.target.checked ? ariaLabelText + ' ' : ' ' + ariaLabelText);
// Keep the sidebar FTS option in sync with the header
if (sidebarFTSCheckbox) {
sidebarFTSCheckbox.checked = !sidebarFTSCheckbox.checked;
}
});
});
</script>
</div>
</div>
<div class="small-2 columns">
<input type="submit" aria-label="Submit search" value="Submit search" class="button postfix">
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<input type="hidden" name="searchWithinIds" value="5F9C25D1D13BCF831548621BF5948AA4" data-search-param="searchWithinIds" data-search-maintain-state="false">
<input type="hidden" name="aggs[productTypes][filters]" value="BOOK_PART" data-search-param="productType" data-search-maintain-state="false">
</form>GET #
<form id="actionsContainer" action="#" method="GET">
<input type="hidden" name="showJackets" id="showJackets" value="" data-search-param="showJackets" data-search-maintain-state="true">
<div class="actions hide" data-search-request-handler="classifications">
<div class="filter-title">
<label for="classifications-tagInput">Classifications</label>
</div>
<div class="columns">
<div class="row">
<div class="row collapse postfix-radius">
<div class="submit-in-field submit-in-field-add clearfix js-outglow-parent">
<div class="small-12 columns">
<input name="classifications-tagInput" id="classifications-tagInput" type="text" value="" placeholder="Add classification" class="js-outglow">
<input type="hidden" name="_csrf" value="Xq6ZF81M-1cKk7DBkLqy6sI7qUXUka3vMPIY">
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<ul class="classifications padding-top-small">
</ul>
</div>
</form><form>
<a href="#" class="select-all" aria-label="Select all content in this listing" data-test-id="linkSelectAll">Select all</a> |
<a href="#" class="deselect-all" aria-label="Deselect all content in this listing" data-test-id="linkDeselectAll">Deselect all</a>
</form>GET /core/services/aop-cambridge-core/sendto
<form id="sendToMultipleForm" action="/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/sendto" method="GET">
<div class="kindle hide">
<fieldset>
<legend>
<label for="kindleEmailAddress">Your Kindle email address</label>
</legend>
<div class="row">
<div class="large-6 columns">
<input name="kindleEmailAddress" id="kindleEmailAddress" type="text" value="" required="required">
<small class="error kindleEmailAddress" style="display:none">Please provide your Kindle email.</small>
</div>
<div class="large-6 columns">
<label class="dInlineBlock"><input name="kindleEmailDomain" type="radio" checked="checked" value="free.kindle.com" class="styled"><span></span>@free.kindle.com</label>
<label class="dInlineBlock"><input name="kindleEmailDomain" type="radio" value="kindle.com" class="styled"><span></span>@kindle.com
(<a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html/ref=kinw_myk_wl_ln?ie=UTF8&nodeId=200767340#fees" target="_blank">service fees apply</a>)</label>
</div>
</div>
</fieldset>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="large-12 columns">
<label for="usagePolicyMultipleSend">
<input type="checkbox" name="usagePolicyMultipleSend" id="usagePolicyMultipleSend" value="Usage" required="" class="styled"><span></span> By using this service, you agree that you will only keep content for personal use, and will not openly
distribute them via Dropbox, Google Drive or other file sharing services </label>
<small class="error usagePolicy" style="display:none">Please confirm that you accept the terms of use.</small>
</div>
</div>
<input type="hidden" name="service" value="">
<input type="hidden" name="documents" value="">
<input type="hidden" name="finalReturn" value="">
<input type="hidden" name="formats" value="pdf">
<input type="hidden" name="_csrf" value="Xq6ZF81M-1cKk7DBkLqy6sI7qUXUka3vMPIY">
</form>POST /core/services/cambridge-core/search/save
<form action="/core/services/cambridge-core/search/save" method="POST" data-abide="ajax" class="saveSearch" id="saveSearch" novalidate="novalidate">
<input type="hidden" name="_csrf" value="Xq6ZF81M-1cKk7DBkLqy6sI7qUXUka3vMPIY">
<h4 class="title">Save Search</h4>
<div class="row">
<div class="large-12 columns">
<div class="panel callout message">
<p>You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".</p>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="small-12 columns">
<label>Search Title: <small>required</small>
<input name="searchTitle" id="searchTitle" type="text" autocomplete="off" required="required" maxlength="40" placeholder="Enter a title for your saved search.">
</label>
<small class="error">Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.</small>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="row margin-top">
<div class="small-6 large-6 columns"><a href="#" onclick="$('#saveSearchModal').foundation('reveal', 'close');return false;" class="right small button radius transparent cancel">Cancel</a></div>
<div class="small-6 large-6 columns"><input type="submit" class="left small radius button blue confirm" value="Save"></div>
</div>
<a class="close-reveal-modal">×</a>
</form>Text Content
Skip to main content Accessibility help
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a
better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find
out how to manage your cookie settings.
LOGIN ALERT
Cancel
Log in
×
×
Discover Content
Products and Services
Register
Log In
(0) Cart
Logo for Cambridge Core from Cambridge University Press. Click to return to
homepage.
Search
Logo for Cambridge Core from Cambridge University Press. Click to return to
homepage.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Browse
* Services
* Open research
Institution Login
Search
* < Back to search results
1. Home
2. Books
3. Fact-Finding before the International Court of Justice
Fact-Finding before the International Court of Justice
FACT-FINDING BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
Search within full text
* * Get access
Buy a print copy
Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
Log in Register
* Cited by 23
* Cited by
* 23
Crossref Citations
THIS BOOK HAS BEEN CITED BY THE FOLLOWING PUBLICATIONS. THIS LIST IS
GENERATED BASED ON DATA PROVIDED BY CROSSREF.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wellens, Karel 2017. The International Court of Justice, Back to the Future:
Keeping the Dream Alive. Netherlands International Law Review, Vol. 64,
Issue. 2, p. 193.
* CrossRef
* Google Scholar
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2017. Books Received. American Journal of International Law, Vol. 111, Issue.
1, p. 222.
* CrossRef
* Google Scholar
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Read, Katherine and Griffiths, Laura 2017. Current Awareness. Legal
Information Management, Vol. 17, Issue. 1, p. 68.
* CrossRef
* Google Scholar
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Popa, Liliana E. 2018. Patterns of Treaty Interpretation as
Anti-Fragmentation Tools. p. 287.
* CrossRef
* Google Scholar
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vylegzhanin, A.N. 2018. The Jurisdiction of the International Court of
Justice: some theoretical issues. Moscow Journal of International Law, p. 6.
* CrossRef
* Google Scholar
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Baetens, Freya and Kluwen, Tim 2018. The Encyclopedia of Diplomacy. p. 1.
* CrossRef
* Google Scholar
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ESPENILLA, Jacqueline Joyce F. 2019. Judicial Fact-Finding Initiatives in
theSouth China Sea Arbitration. Asian Journal of International Law, Vol. 9,
Issue. 1, p. 20.
* CrossRef
* Google Scholar
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gros, Guillaume 2019. Legitimacy of Unseen Actors in International
Adjudication. p. 347.
* CrossRef
* Google Scholar
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lima, Lucas Carlos 2019. Interpretations of the United Nations Convention on
the Law of the Sea by International Courts and Tribunals. p. 407.
* CrossRef
* Google Scholar
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kim, Hun Joon 2019. Are UN Investigations into Human Rights Violations a
Viable Solution? An Assessment of UN Commissions of Inquiry. Journal of Human
Rights Practice, Vol. 11, Issue. 1, p. 96.
* CrossRef
* Google Scholar
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MENKES, MARCIN J. 2019. The Legality of US Investment Sanctions against Iran
before the ICJ: A Watershed Moment for the Essential Security and Necessity
Exceptions. Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit
international, Vol. 56, Issue. , p. 328.
* CrossRef
* Google Scholar
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2020. Certain Activities Carried Out by Nicaragua in the Border Area.
International Law Reports, Vol. 187, Issue. , p. 1.
* CrossRef
* Google Scholar
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cortesi, Giulio Alvaro 2022. Proof and the Burden of Proof in International
Investment Law. Vol. 24, Issue. , p. 101.
* CrossRef
* Google Scholar
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cortesi, Giulio Alvaro 2022. Proof and the Burden of Proof in International
Investment Law. Vol. 24, Issue. , p. 1.
* CrossRef
* Google Scholar
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2022. Merrills' International Dispute Settlement. p. 231.
* CrossRef
* Google Scholar
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Illingworth, Richard 2022. An R2P Commission: A Proposal for Holding States
Accountable to Their Responsibility to Protect. Global Studies Quarterly,
Vol. 2, Issue. 1,
* CrossRef
* Google Scholar
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Switzer, Stephanie 2022. The Environment Through the Lens of International
Courts and Tribunals. p. 121.
* CrossRef
* Google Scholar
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cortesi, Giulio Alvaro 2022. Proof and the Burden of Proof in International
Investment Law. Vol. 24, Issue. , p. 13.
* CrossRef
* Google Scholar
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lesch, Max 2023. Contested Facts: The Politics and Practice of International
Fact-Finding Missions. International Studies Review, Vol. 25, Issue. 3,
* CrossRef
* Google Scholar
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Liao, Boyu Chang, Yen-Chiang and Khan, Mehran Idris 2023. The impact of the
monetary gold principle on the determination of jurisdiction in the mixed
maritime disputes. Science Progress, Vol. 106, Issue. 2,
* CrossRef
* Google Scholar
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download full list
×
* James Gerard Devaney, University of Glasgow
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Online publication date: September 2016
Print publication year: 2016
Online ISBN: 9781316498972
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316498972
Subjects: Public International Law, Law, Politics and International Relations,
International Relations and International Organisations
* 41.99 (USD)
Digital access for individuals
(PDF download and/or read online)
Add to cart
Added to cart
Digital access for individuals
(PDF download and/or read online)
View cart
* Export citation
* Buy a print copy
*
* Share
* * Copy
* Share
* Share
* Share
* Share
* Post
* Share
* Mail
* Share
Contents
Information
Contents
References
Metrics
BOOK DESCRIPTION
Fact-Finding before the International Court of Justice examines a number of
significant recent criticisms of the way in which the ICJ deals with facts. The
book takes the position that such criticisms are warranted and that the ICJ's
current approach to fact-finding falls short of adequacy, both in cases
involving abundant, particularly complex or technical facts, and in those
involving a scarcity of facts. The author skilfully examines how other courts
such as the WTO and inter-State arbitrations conduct fact-finding and makes a
number of select proposals for reform, enabling the ICJ to address some of the
current weaknesses in its approach. The proposals include, but are not limited
to, the development of a power to compel the disclosure of information, greater
use of provisional measures, and a clear strategy for the use of expert
evidence.
*
* * Aa Reduce text
* Aa Enlarge text
REFINE LIST
*
Classifications
ACTIONS FOR SELECTED CONTENT:
Select all | Deselect all
* View selected items
* Save to my bookmarks
* Export citations
* Download PDF (zip)
* Save to Kindle
* Save to Dropbox
* Save to Google Drive
* SAVE CONTENT TO
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide
by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you
will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find
out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is
added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal
Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon
account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find
out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com
variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your
device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered
even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
You are about to save
*
Your Kindle email address
Please provide your Kindle email.
@free.kindle.com @kindle.com (service fees apply)
By using this service, you agree that you will only keep content for personal
use, and will not openly distribute them via Dropbox, Google Drive or other
file sharing services Please confirm that you accept the terms of use.
Cancel
Save
×
SAVE SEARCH
You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved
searches".
Search Title: required Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×
CONTENTS
Contents
Select Frontmatter
* FRONTMATTER
PP I-IV
* * * Get access
Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
Log in Register
* Export citation
Select Contents
* CONTENTS
PP V-VI
* * * Get access
Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
Log in Register
* Export citation
Select Table of cases
* TABLE OF CASES
PP VII-XV
* * * Get access
Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
Log in Register
* Export citation
Select Acknowledgements
* ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
PP XVI-XVIII
* * * Get access
Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
Log in Register
* Export citation
Select Introduction
* INTRODUCTION
PP 1-13
* * * Get access
Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
Log in Register
* Export citation
Select 1 - Rules of evidence before the International Court of Justice
* 1 - RULES OF EVIDENCE BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
PP 14-72
* * * Get access
Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
Log in Register
* Export citation
Select 2 - Criticisms of the Court's current reactive approach to fact-finding
* 2 - CRITICISMS OF THE COURT'S CURRENT REACTIVE APPROACH TO FACT-FINDING
PP 73-126
* * * Get access
Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
Log in Register
* Export citation
Select 3 - The practice of other international courts and tribunals
* 3 - THE PRACTICE OF OTHER INTERNATIONAL COURTS AND TRIBUNALS
PP 127-178
* * * Get access
Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
Log in Register
* Export citation
Select 4 - Winds of change: the possibility of reform
* 4 - WINDS OF CHANGE: THE POSSIBILITY OF REFORM
PP 179-241
* * * Get access
Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
Log in Register
* Export citation
Select 5 - A more proactive approach to fact-finding
* 5 - A MORE PROACTIVE APPROACH TO FACT-FINDING
PP 242-253
* * * Get access
Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
Log in Register
* Export citation
Select Epilogue
* EPILOGUE
PP 254-256
* * * Get access
Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
Log in Register
* Export citation
Select Bibliography
* BIBLIOGRAPHY
PP 257-274
* * * Get access
Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
Log in Register
* Export citation
Select Index
* INDEX
PP 275-287
* * * Get access
Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
Log in Register
* Export citation
References
Bibliography
Abi-Saab, G, ‘Independence of the Judiciary from Political Organs’ in
Chazournes, L Boisson de, Romano, C and Mackenzie, R (eds), International
Organizations and International Dispute Settlement: Trends and Prospects
(Ardsley NY, Transnational 2002 Google Scholar)
Ahmad, J, ‘ The Indus Waters Kishenganga Arbitration and State-to-State
Disputes’ 29(2013) Arbitration International Google Scholar 507
Åhman, J, Trade, Health, and The Burden of Proof in WTO Law (Alphen aan den
Rijn, Netherlands, Kluwer Law International 2012 Google Scholar)
Akande, D and Tonkin, H, ‘International Commissions of Inquiry: A New Form of
Adjudication?’ EJIL: Talk! 6 April 2012 Google Scholar
Alexandrov, SA, ‘Non-appearance before the International Court of Justice’ 33
(1995) Columbia Journal of Transnational Law Google Scholar 41
Alford, NH Jr, ‘Fact Finding by the World Court’ 4 (1959) Villanova Law Review
Google Scholar 37
Alvarez, J, ‘Are International Judges Afraid of Science?: A Comment on Mbengue’
34 (2012) Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review Google
Scholar 12
Alvarez, JE, Burdens of Proof (ASIL, ASIL Newsletter: Notes from the President
2007 Google Scholar)
Amerasinghe, CF, Evidence in International Litigation (Leiden, Boston, Martinus
Nijhoff 2005 Google Scholar)
Arangio-Ruiz, V, ‘The ICJ Statute, the Charter and Forms of Legality Review of
Security Council Decisions’ in Vorah, LC (ed), Man's Inhumanity to Man, Essays
in Honour of Antonio Cassese (The Hague, Kluwer Law International 2003 Google
Scholar)
Bantekas, I and Ntah, S, International Criminal Law (London, Cavendish 2003
Google Scholar)
Barceló, J, ‘Burden of Proof, Prima Facie Case and Presumption in WTO Dispute
Settlement’ 42 (2009) Cornell International Law Journal Google Scholar 23
Bassiouni, MC, ‘Appraising UN Justice-Related Fact-Finding Missions’ 5 (2001)
Washington University Journal of Law and Policy Google Scholar 35
Beckman, R, ‘The Philippines v. China Case and the South China Sea Disputes’
Asia Society, LKY SPP Conference, South China Sea: Central to Asia-Pacific Peace
and Security, New York, 13–15 Mar 2013 Google Scholar: Centre for International
Law
Beckman, R, ‘The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea and the Maritime Disputes
in the South China Sea’ [American Society of International Law] 107 (2013) The
American Journal of International Law Google Scholar 142
Bedjaoui, M, ‘The Manufacture of Judgments at the International Court of
Justice’ 3 (1991) Pace Yearbook of International Law Google Scholar 29
Bedjaoui, M, The New World Order and the Security Council: Testing the Legality
of its Acts (The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1994 Google Scholar)
Bedjaoui, M, ‘La “Descente sur les lieux” dans la pratique de la Cour
International de Justice et de sa devancière’ in Rest, A, Hafner, G et al. (eds)
Liber Amicorum Professor Ignaz Seidl-Hohenveldern (The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff
1998 Google Scholar)
Behboodi, R, ‘“Should” Means “Shall”: A Critical Analysis of the Obligation to
Submit Information Under Article 13.1 of the DSU in the Canada-Aircraft case’ 3
(2000) Journal of International Economic Law Google Scholar 563
Benzing, M, Das Beweisrecht vor internationalen Gerichten und Schiedsgerichten
in zwischenstaatlichen Streitigkeiten, Vol. 215 (Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer
2010 Google Scholar)
Benzing, M, ‘Evidentiary Issues’ in Zimmermann, A et al. (eds), The Statute of
the International Court of Justice (, Oxford University Press 2012 Google
Scholar)
Bergsmo, M (ed), Quality Control in Fact-Finding (Florence, Torkel Opsahl 2013
Google Scholar)
Berman, F, ‘Remarks by Frank Berman’ 106 (2012) Proceedings of the Annual
Meeting (American Society of International Law) Google Scholar 162
Bernárdez, ST, ‘Article 48’ in Zimmermann, A (ed), The Statute of the
International Court of Justice: A Commentary (Oxford University Press 2006
Google Scholar)
Bilder, RR, ‘The Fact/Law Distinction in International Adjudication’ in Lillich,
R (ed), Fact-finding before International Tribunals (Irvington-on-Hudson NY,
Transnational 1992 Google Scholar)
Boas, G, ‘Admissibility of Evidence under the Rules of Procedure and Evidence of
the ICTY: Development of the “Flexibility Principle”’ in May, R et al. (eds),
Essays on ICTY Procedure and Evidence in Honour of Gabrielle Kirk McDonald (The
Hague, Martinus Nijhoff 2001 Google Scholar)
Böckstiegel, K-H, ‘The Relevance of National Arbitration Law for Arbitrations
Under the UNCITRAL Rules’ 1 (1984) Journal of International Arbitration Google
Scholar 223
Chazournes, L Boisson de, ‘Introduction: Courts and Tribunals and the Treatment
of Scientific Issues’ 3 (2012) Journal of International Dispute Settlement
Google Scholar 479
Bothe, M, ‘The WHO Request’ in Chazournes, L Boisson de and Sands, P (eds),
International Law, the International Court of Justice and Nuclear Weapons
(Cambridge University Press 1999 Google Scholar)
Bothe, M, ‘Fact-finding as a Means of Ensuring Respect for International
Humanitarian Law’ in Heinegg, W and Volker, E (eds) International Humanitarian
Law Facing New Challenges (Berlin, New York, Springer 2007 Google Scholar)
Bowring, J, The Works of Jeremy Bentham (Edinburgh, William Tait 1843 Google
Scholar) Vol. 6, 139
Boutruche, T, ‘Credible Fact-Finding and Allegations of International
Humanitarian Law Violations: Challenges in Theory and Practice’ 16 (2011)
Journal of Conflict and Security Law Google Scholar 105
Boyle, A and Harrison, J, ‘Judicial Settlement of International Environmental
Disputes: Current Problems’ 4 (2013) Journal of International Dispute Settlement
Google Scholar 245
Bronckers, M and McNelis, N, ‘Fact and Law in Pleadings before the WTO Appellate
Body’ in Weiss, F (ed), Improving WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures: Issues and
Lessons from the Practice of Other International Courts and Tribunals (London,
Cameron May 2000 Google Scholar)
Brower, CN, ‘The Anatomy of Fact-Finding Before International Tribunals: An
Analysis and a Proposal Concerning the Evaluation of Evidence’ in Lillich, RB
(ed), Fact-Finding Before International Tribunals (Irvington-on-Hudson NY,
Transnational 1992 Google Scholar)
Brower, CN, ‘Evidence before International Tribunals: The Need for Some Standard
Rules’ 28 (1994) The International Lawyer Google Scholar 47
Brower, CN and Brueschke, JD, The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal (The Hague,
Boston, London, Martinus Nijhoff 1998 Google Scholar)
Brown, C, A Common Law of International Adjudication (Oxford University Press
2007 Google Scholar)
Brownlie, I, ‘The Justiciability of Disputes and Issues in International
Relations’ 42 (1967) British Yearbook of International Law Google Scholar 123
Buffard, I and Zemanek, K, ‘The “Object and Purpose” of a Treaty: An Enigma?’ 3
(1998) Austrian Review of International and European Law Google Scholar 311
Cameron, J and Orava, SJ, ‘GATT/WTO Panels between Recording and Finding Facts:
Issues of Due Process, Evidence, Burden of Proof, and Standard of Review in
GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement’ in Weiss, F (ed), Improving WTO Dispute Settlement
Procedures: Issues and Lessons from the Practice of Other International Courts
and Tribunals (London, Cameron May 2000 Google Scholar)
Cardozo, BN, The Nature of the Judicial Process (Yale University Press 1921
Google Scholar)
Cassese, A, ‘Fostering Increased Conformity with International Standards:
Monitoring and Institutional Fact-Finding’ in Cassese, A (ed), Realizing Utopia:
The Future of International Law (Oxford University Press 2012 Google Scholar)
Cassese, A, ‘The International Court of Justice: It is High Time to Restyle the
Respected Old Lady’ in Cassese, A (ed), Realizing Utopia: The Future of
International Law (Oxford University Press 2012 Google Scholar)
Charney, JI, ‘Disputes Implicating the Institutional Credibility of the Court:
Problems of Non-Appearance, Non-Participation, and Non-Performance’ in Damrosch,
L (ed), The International Court of Justice at a Crossroads (Dobbs Ferry NY,
Transnational 1987 Google Scholar)
Chinkin, C, ‘U.N. Human Rights Council Fact-Finding Missions: Lessons from Gaza’
in Arsanjani, M et al. (eds), Looking to the Future: Essays on International Law
in Honour of W Michael Reisman (Boston, Martinus Nijhoff 2011 Google Scholar)
Chinkin, CM and Mackenzie, R, ‘Intergovernmental Organizations as “Friends of
the Court”’ in Chazournes, L (ed), International Organizations and International
Disputes Settlement – Trends and Prospects (Ardsley NY, Transnational 2002
Google Scholar)
Christoforou, T, ‘Settlement of Science-based Trade Disputes in the WTO: A
Critical Review of the Developing Case Law in the Face of Scientific
Uncertainty’ 8 (1999) New York University Environmental Law Journal Google
Scholar 622
Christoforou, T, ‘WTO Panels in Face of Scientific Uncertainty’ in Weiss, F
(ed), Improving WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures: Issues and Lessons from the
Practice of Other International Courts and Tribunals (London, Cameron May 2000
Google Scholar)
Cogan, JK, ‘The 2010 Judicial Activity of the International Court of Justice’
105 (2011) American Journal of International Law Google Scholar 477
Collins, D, ‘Institutionalized Fact-Finding at the WTO’ 27 (2006) University of
Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law Google Scholar 367
Combs, NA, Fact-finding Without Facts: The Uncertain Evidentiary Foundations of
International Criminal Convictions (Cambridge University Press 2010 Google
Scholar)
Couvreur, P, ‘Le Règlement Juridictionel’ in Institut du droit économique de la
mer (ed), Le processus de délimitation maritime étude d'un cas fictif: colloque
international Monoco 27–29 mars 2003 (Paris, Pedone 2004 Google Scholar) 380
Cronin-Furman, KR, ‘The International Court of Justice and the United Nations
Security Council: Rethinking a Complicated Relationship’ 106 (2006) Columbia Law
Review Google Scholar 435
Crook, J, ‘The Case Concerning Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo
(Democratic Republic of Congo v. Uganda) and Its Implications for the Rules on
the Use of Force’ (2006 Google Scholar, American Society of International Law
Briefing at Tillar House)
D'Aspremont, J, ‘The Recommendations Made by the International Court of Justice’
56 (2007) International and Comparative Law Quarterly Google Scholar 185
D'Aspremont, J and Mbengue, MM Google Scholar, ‘Strategies of Engagement with
Scientific Fact-Finding in International Adjudication’ (Amsterdam Law School
Research Paper No. 2013-20)
Daly, B, ‘The Abyei Arbitration: Procedural Aspects of an Intra-state Border
Arbitration’ 23 (2010) Leiden Journal of International Law Google Scholar 801
Damaška, M, ‘The Uncertain Fate of Evidentiary Transplants: Anglo-American and
Continental Experiments’ 45 (1997) The American Journal of Comparative Law
Google Scholar 839
Serre, E De la and Sibony, A, ‘Expert Evidence before the EC Courts’, 45 (2008)
Common Market Law Review Google Scholar 4
Vabres, HD de, L'action publique et l'action civile dans les rapports de droit
pénal international (Leiden, Boston, Brill, Nijhoff, 1929 Google Scholar)
Wet, E De, The Chapter VII Powers of the United Nations Security Council
(Oxford, Hart Publishing 2004 Google Scholar)
Mar, K Del, ‘Weight of Evidence Generated through Intra-Institutional
Fact-Finding before the International Court of Justice’ 2 (2011) Journal of
International Dispute Settlement Google Scholar 393
Delbrück, J, ‘Review of Fact-Finding before International Tribunals, Edited by
Richard B. Lillich’ 88 (1994) American Journal of International Law Google
Scholar 191
Delbrück, J, ‘Article 24’ in Simma, B (ed), Charter of the United Nations: A
Commentary (Oxford University Press 2002 Google Scholar)
Derham, R and Derham, N, ‘From Ad Hoc to Hybrid – the Rules and Regulations
Governing Reception of Expert Evidence at the International Criminal Court’ 14
(2010) International Journal of Evidence and Proof Google Scholar 25
Devaney, JG Google Scholar, ‘Killing Two Birds with One Stone: Can Increased Use
of Article 34(2) of the ICJ Statute Improve the Legitimacy of UN Commissions of
Inquiry & the Court's Fact-Finding Procedure?’ STALS Research Paper 2/2013
Distefano, G and Henry, E, ‘The International Court of Justice and the Security
Council: Disentangling Themis from Ares’ in Bannelier, K, Christakis, T and
Heathcote, S (eds), The ICJ and the Evolution of International Law: The enduring
impact of the Corfu Channel Case (Oxford, New York, Routledge 2012 Google
Scholar)
Dupuy, F and Dupuy, P-M, ‘A Legal Analysis of China's Historic Rights Claim in
the South China Sea’ 107 (2013) The American Journal of International Law Google
Scholar 124
Dupuy, P-M, ‘Article 34’ in Zimmermann, A (ed), The Statute of the International
Court of Justice: A Commentary (Oxford University Press 2006 Google Scholar)
Eiriksson, G, The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (The Hague,
Martinus Nijhoff 2000 Google Scholar)
Elkind, JB, Non-Appearance before the International Court of Justice: Functional
and Comparative Analysis (The Hague, Boston, Martinus Nijhoff 1984 Google
Scholar)
Elsen, TJH, Litispendence between the International Court of Justice and the
Security Council (The Hague, TMC Asser Instituut 1986 Google Scholar)
Fassbender, B, ‘Review essay: Quis judicabit? The Security Council, its powers
and its legal control’ 11 (2000) European Journal of International Law Google
Scholar 219
Feldman, T, ‘A Tale of Two Closures: Comments on the Palmer Report Concerning
the May 2010 Flotilla Incident’ EJIL: Talk! 20 September 2011 Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, G, ‘The Problem of the “Non-Appearing” Defendant Government’ 51
(1981) British Yearbook of International Law Google Scholar 89
Fitzmaurice, SG, The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice
(Cambridge, Grotius 1986 Google Scholar)
Foster, CE, ‘Burden of Proof in International Courts and Tribunals’ 29 (2010)
Australian Year Book of International Law Google Scholar 27
Foster, CE, Science and the Precautionary Principle in International Courts and
Tribunals: Expert Evidence, Burden of Proof and Finality (Cambridge University
Press 2011 Google Scholar)
Foster, CE, ‘New Clothes for the Emperor? Consultation of Experts by the
International Court of Justice’ 5 (2014) Journal of International Dispute
Settlement Google Scholar 139
Francioni, F, ‘Multilateralism à la carte: the Limits to Unilateral Withholdings
of Assessed Contributions to the UN Budget’ 11 (2000) European Journal of
International Law Google Scholar 43
Francioni, F, ‘Integrating Scientific Evidence into Environmental Law: the
International Dimension’ in Grassi, S et al. (eds) Scientific Evidence in
European Environmental Rule-Making (The Hague, Kluwer 2003 Google Scholar)
Francioni, F, ‘Access to Justice, Denial of Justice and International Investment
Law’ 20 (2009) European Journal of International Law Google Scholar 729
Franck, T, ‘Fact-Finding in the I.C.J.’ in Lillich, RB (ed), Fact-Finding before
International Tribunals (Irvington-on-Hudson NY, Transnational 1992 Google
Scholar)
Franck, T, Fairness in International Law and Institutions (Oxford, Clarendon
Press 2002 Google Scholar)
Franck, TM and Farley, HS, ‘Procedural Due Process in Human Rights Fact-Finding
by International Agencies’ 74 (1980) American Journal of International Law
Google Scholar 308
Fry, JD, ‘Non-Participation in the International Court of Justice Revisited:
Change or Plus Ca Change’ 49 (2010) Columbia Journal of Transnational Law Google
Scholar 35
Gaja, G, ‘A New Way for Submitting Observations on the Construction of
Multilateral Treaties to the ICJ’ in Fastenrath, U et al. (eds) From
Bilateralism to Community Interest: Essays in Honour of Bruno Summa, (Oxford
University Press 2011 Google Scholar)
Gaja, G, ‘Relationship of the ICJ with Other International Courts and Tribunals’
in Zimmermann, A et al. (eds), The Statute of the International Court of Justice
(, Oxford University Press 2012 Google Scholar)
Gao, Z and Jia, BB, ‘The Nine-Dash Line in the South China Sea: History, Status,
and Implications’ 107 (2013) The American Journal of International Law Google
Scholar 98
Gardiner, R, Treaty Interpretation (Oxford University Press 2008 Google Scholar)
Gatowski, SI et al., ‘Asking the Gatekeepers: A National Survey of Judges on
Judging Expert Evidence in a Post-Daubert World’ 25 (2001) Law and Human
Behavior Google Scholar 433
Gattini, A, ‘Evidentiary Issues in the ICJ's Genocide Judgment’ 5 (2007) Journal
of International Criminal Justice Google Scholar 889
Gill, TD, ‘Legal and Some Political Limitations on the Power of the UN Security
Council to Exercise its Enforcement Powers under Chapter VII of the Charter’ 26
(1995) Netherlands Yearbook of International Law Google Scholar 33
Gill, TD and Rosenne, S, The World Court: What It Is and How It Works, Vol 41
(The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff 2003 Google Scholar)
Goldstone, RJ, ‘Quality Control in International Fact-Finding Outside Criminal
Justice for Core International Crimes’ in Bergsmo, M (ed), Quality Control in
Fact-Finding (Florence, Torkel-Opsahl 2013 Google Scholar)
Goldstone, RJ and Hamilton, RJ, ‘Bosnia v. Serbia: Lessons from the Encounter of
the International Court of Justice with the International Criminal Tribunal for
the Former Yugoslavia’ 21 (2008) Leiden Journal of International Law Google
Scholar 95
Gowlland-Debbas, V, ‘The Relationship between the International Court of Justice
and the Security Council in the Light of the Lockerbie Case’ 88 (1994) The
American Journal of International Law Google Scholar 643
Gowlland-Debbas, V, ‘Article 7’ in Zimmermann, A (ed), The Statute of the
International Court of Justice: A Commentary (Oxford University Press 2006
Google Scholar)
Grace, R and Bruderlein, C, ‘On Monitoring, Reporting, and Fact-finding
Mechanisms’ 1 (2012) European Society of International Law Reflections Google
Scholar 1
Grando, M, ‘Allocating the Burden of Proof in WTO Disputes: A Critical Analysis’
9 (2006) Journal of International Economic Law Google Scholar 615
Grando, M, Evidence, Proof, and Fact-Finding in WTO Dispute Settlement (Oxford
University Press 2009 Google Scholar)
Gray, C and Kingsbury, B, ‘Developments in Dispute Settlement: Inter-State
Arbitration Since 1945’ 63 (1992) British Yearbook of International Law Google
Scholar 97
Gross, SR, ‘Expert Evidence’ (1991 Google Scholar) Wisconsin Law Review 1113
Grossman, GM, Horn, H and Mavroidis, PC, ‘Legal and Economic Principles of World
Trade Law: National Treatment’ IFN Working Paper No 917, 2012 Google Scholar
Guilfoyle, D, ‘The Mavi Marmara Incident and Blockade in Armed Conflict’ 81
(2011) British Yearbook of International Law Google Scholar 171
Guilfoyle, D, ‘The Palmer Report on the Mavi Marmara Incident and the Legality
of Israel's Blockade of the Gaza Strip’ EJIL: Talk! 6 September 2011 Google
Scholar
Halink, S, ‘All Things Considered: How the International Court of Justice
Delegated Its Fact-Assessment to the United Nations in the Armed Activities
Case’ 40 (2007) New York University Journal of International Law & Policy Google
Scholar 13
Hamamoto, S Google Scholar, ‘Procedural Questions in the Whaling Judgment:
Admissibility, Intervention and Use of Experts’ Japanese Society of
International Law, The Honorable Shigeru Oda Commemorative Lectures 1
Harrison, JL, ‘Reconceptualizing the Expert Witness: Social Costs, Current
Controls on Proposed Responses’ 18 (2001) Yale Journal on Regulation Google
Scholar 253
Helland, E and Klick, J, ‘Does Anyone Get Stopped at the Gate? An Empirical
Assessment of the Daubert Trilogy in the States’ 20 (2012) Supreme Court
Economic Review Google Scholar 1
Henckaerts, J and Wiesener, C, ‘Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Armed
Groups: A Possible Contribution from Customary International Law?’ in Kolb, R
and Gaggioli, G (eds), Research Handbook on Human Rights and Humanitarian Law
(Cheltenham, Edward Elgar 2013 Google Scholar)
Higgins, R, ‘The Place of International Law in the Settlement of Disputes by the
Security Council’ 64 (1970) The American Journal of International Law Google
Scholar 1
Higgins, R, Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It (Oxford,
Clarendon Press 1995 Google Scholar)
Higgins, R, ‘Interim Measures for the Protection of Human Rights’ 36 (1997)
Columbia Journal of Transnational Law Google Scholar 91
Higgins, R, Speech by H. E. Judge Rosalynn Higgins, President of the
International Court of Justice (At the 58th Session of the International Law
Commission, 2006 Google Scholar)
Higgins, R, ‘Speech by H.E. Judge Rosalyn Higgins, President of the
International Court of Justice to the Sixth Committee of the General Assembly’
(Sixth Committee of the General Assembly, 2 November 2007 Google Scholar)
Higgins, R, ‘Introductory Remarks by Rosalyn Higgins’ 106 (2012 Google Scholar)
Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law) 229
Highet, K, ‘Evidence and Proof of Facts’ in Damrosch, LF (ed), The International
Court of Justice at a Crossroads (Irvington-on-Hudson NY, Transnational 1987
Google Scholar)
Highet, K, ‘Evidence, the Court, and the Nicaragua Case’ 81 (1987) The American
Journal of International Law Google Scholar 1
Highet, K, ‘Evidence, The Chamber, and the ELSI Case’ in Lillich, RB (ed),
Fact-Finding before International Tribunals (Ardsley-on-Hudson NY, Transnational
1992 Google Scholar)
Holtzmann, HM, ‘Fact-Finding by the Iran–United States Claims Tribunal’ in
Lillich, RB (ed), Fact-Finding before International Tribunals
(Irvington-on-Hudson NY, Transnational 1991 Google Scholar)
Holtzmann, HM, Streamlining Arbitral Proceedings: Some Techniques of the
Iran-United States Claims Tribunal (The Hague, Kluwer Law International 2007
Google Scholar)
Howse, R, ‘The Most Dangerous Branch? WTO Appellate Body Jurisprudence on the
Nature and Limits of the Judicial Power’ in Cottier, T, Mavroidis, PC and
Blatter, P (eds), The Role of the Judge in International Trade Regulation:
Experience and Lessons for the WTO, Vol 4 (University of Michigan Press 2009
Google Scholar)
Hudson, M, The Permanent Court of International Justice 1920–1942 (New York,
MacMillan 1943 Google Scholar)
Hutcheson, J, ‘Judgment Intuitive The Function of the Hunch in Judicial
Decision’ 14 (1928) Cornell Law Quarterly Google Scholar 274
Imwinkelried, EJ, ‘Evaluating the Reliability of Nonscientific Expert Testimony:
A Partial Answer to the Questions Left Unresolved by Kumho Tire Co. v.
Carmichael’ 52 (2000) Maine Law Review Google Scholar 19
Iynedjian, M, ‘The Case for Incorporating Scientists and Technicians into WTO
Panels’ 42 (2008) Journal of World Trade Google Scholar 279
Jacheć-Neale, A Google Scholar, ‘Fact-Finding’ in Wolfrum R (ed) Max Planck
Encyclopedia of Public International Law (online edition)
http://opil.ouplaw.com/home/EPIL
Jackson, J, ‘Finding the Best Epistemic Fit for International Criminal Tribunals
Beyond the Adversarial–Inquisitorial Dichotomy’ 7 (2009) Journal of
International Criminal Justice Google Scholar 17
Jacur, FR, ‘Remarks on the Role of Ex Curia Scientific Experts in International
Environmental Disputes’ in Boschiero, N et al. (eds), International Courts and
the Development of International Law (Berlin, Springer, Asser Press 2013 Google
Scholar)
Jasanoff, S, ‘What Judges Should Know about the Sociology of Science’ 32 (1992)
Jurimetrics Google Scholar 345
Jennings, SR, ‘International Lawyers and the Progressive Development of
International Law’ in Makarczyk, J (ed), Theory of International Law at the
Threshold of the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Krzystof Skubiszewski (The
Hague, Kluwer Law International 1996 Google Scholar)
Aréchaga, E Jiménez de, ‘Le traitement des différends internationaux par le
Conseil de Sécurité’ 85 (1954-I) Recueil des cours Google Scholar, 1
Jolowicz, JA, On Civil Procedure (Cambridge University Press 2000 Google
Scholar)
Joor, J and Stuart, HV, The Building of Peace, A Hundred Years of Work on Peace
through Law: The Peace Palace 1913–2013 (The Hague, Eleven International 2013
Google Scholar)
Karaman, IV, Dispute Resolution in the Law of the Sea, Vol 72 (The Hague,
Martinus Nijhoff 2012 Google Scholar)
Kazazi, M, Burden of Proof and Related Issues: A Study on Evidence before
International Tribunals, Vol 1 (The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff 1996 Google Scholar)
Keith, K, ‘The International Court of Justice and Criminal Justice’ 59 (2010)
International and Comparative Law Quarterly Google Scholar 895
Kelsall, T, Culture Under Cross-examination: International Justice and the
Special Court for Sierra Leone (Cambridge University Press 2009 Google Scholar)
Kelsen, H, The Law of the United Nations: A Critical Analysis of Its Fundamental
Problems (New York, Frederick A. Praeger 1950 Google Scholar)
Khan, KAA, Buisman, C and Gosnell, C, Principles of Evidence in International
Criminal Justice (Oxford University Press 2010 Google Scholar)
Klabbers, J, ‘Some Problems Regarding the Object and Purpose of Treaties’ 8
(2006) Finnish Yearbook of International Law Google Scholar 138
Klabbers, J Google Scholar, ‘Treaties, Object and Purpose’ in Wolfrum R (ed) Max
Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (online edition)
http://opil.ouplaw.com/home/EPIL
Klein, N, Dispute Settlement in the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, Vol 39
(Cambridge University Press 2005 Google Scholar)
Knoops, G-JA, ‘The Proliferation of the Ultimate Issue Rule Pertaining to Expert
Witnesses Testimony before International and Internationalized Criminal Courts:
Pitfalls and Paradoxes’ in Capaldo GZ (ed), The Global Community Yearbook of
International Law and Jurisprudence 2001, Vol 1 (2006 Google Scholar–7)
Kolb, R, The International Court of Justice (Oxford, Hart 2013 Google Scholar)
Kuyper, PJ, ‘The Appellate Body and the Facts’ in Bronckers, M and Quick, R
(eds), New Directions in International Economic Law, Essays in Honour of John H.
Jackson (The Hague, Kluwer Law International 2000 Google Scholar)
Labuda, P, ‘What Lies Beneath the ‘G’ Word? Genocide-Labelling and Fact-Finding
at the UN’ EJIL: Talk! 28 May 2015 Google Scholar
Lalive, JF, ‘Quelques remarques sur la preuve devant la Cour permanente et la
Cour internationale de justice’ 7 (1950) Annuaire Suisse de Droit International
Google Scholar 77
Lamb, S, ‘Legal Limits to United Nations Security Council Powers’ in
Goodwin-Gill, G and Talmon, S, The Reality of International Law Essays in Honour
of Ian Brownlie, (Oxford University Press 1999 Google Scholar)
Lauterpacht, H, ‘The So-Called Anglo-American and Continental Schools of Thought
in International Law’ 12 (1931) British Yearbook of International Law Google
Scholar 31
Lauterpacht, H, The Development of International Law by the International Court
(Cambridge University Press 1958 Google Scholar)
Lauterpacht, H, Aspects of the Administration of International Justice
(Cambridge University Press 1991 Google Scholar)
Lichtenbaum, P, ‘Procedural Issues in WTO Dispute Resolution’ 19 (1997) Michigan
Journal of International Law Google Scholar 1195
Lillich, R (ed), Fact-finding Before International Tribunals
(Irvington-on-Hudson NY, Transnational 1992 Google Scholar)
Linderfalk, U, ‘On the Meaning of the “Object and Purpose” Criterion, in the
Context of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Article 19’ 72 (2003)
Nordic Journal of International Law Google Scholar 429
Lowe, V and Tzanakopoulos, A, ‘The Abyei Arbitration’ in Bosman, L and Clark, H
(eds), The Abyei Arbitration (Sudan/Sudan People's Liberation Movement/Army)
(The Permanent Court of Arbitration Award Series, The Permanent Court of
Arbitration 2012 Google Scholar)
Ludes, FJ and Gilbert, HJ (eds), Corpus Juris Secundum: A Complete Restatement
of the Entire American Law, Vol 31 A: Evidence (St Paul, West Publishing 1964
Google Scholar)
Lugard, M, ‘Scope of Appellate Review: Objective Assessment of the Facts and
Issues of Law’ 1 (1998) Journal of International Economic Law Google Scholar 323
MacCormick, N, Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (Oxford, Clarendon Press 1978
Google Scholar)
Mackenzie, R et al., The Manual on International Courts and Tribunals (, Oxford
University Press 2010 Google Scholar)
Mani, VS, International Adjudication: Procedural Aspects, Vol 4 (The Hague,
Kluwer Law International 1980 Google Scholar)
Marceau, GZ and Hawkins, JK, ‘Experts in WTO Dispute Settlement’ 3 (2012)
Journal of International Dispute Settlement Google Scholar 493
Marriott, AL, ‘Evidence in International Arbitration’ 5 (1989) Arbitration
International Google Scholar 280
Martenczuk, B, ‘The Security Council, the International Court and Judicial
Review: What Lessons from Lockerbie?’ 10 (1999) European Journal of
International Law Google Scholar 517
Mathias, S et al., The International Court of Justice at 60: Performance and
Prospects (Proceedings of the Annual Meeting, American Society of International
Law, Vol. 100, Annual 2006 Google Scholar)
Matsushita, M, Schoenbaum, TJ and Mavroidis, PC, The World Trade Organization,
Vol 127 (Oxford University Press 2006 Google Scholar)
Mavroidis, PC, ‘Amicus Curiae Briefs before the WTO: Much Ado About Nothing’ in
Bogdandy, A von, Mavroidis, PC and Mény, Y (eds), European Integration and
International Co-ordination: Studies in Transnational Economic Law in Honour of
Claus-Dieter Ehlermann (The Hague, Kluwer Law International 2002 Google Scholar)
Mavroidis, PC, ‘Development of WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures’ in Ortino, F
and Petersmann, E (eds), Development of WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures, Vol
18 (The Hague, Kluwer Law International 2004 Google Scholar)
Mavroidis, PC, Trade in Goods (, Oxford University Press 2012 Google Scholar)
Mavroidis, PC, Bermann, GA and Wu, M (eds), The Law of the World Trade
Organization (WTO): Documents, Cases & Analysis (Eagea MN, West 2010 Google
Scholar)
May, R and Wierda, M, ‘Evidence before the ICTY’ in May, R et al. (eds), Essays
on ICTY procedure and evidence in honour of Gabrielle Kirk McDonald (The Hague,
Martinus Nijhoff 2000 Google Scholar)
Mbengue, MM, ‘International Courts and Tribunals as Fact-Finders: The Case of
Scientific Fact-Finding in International Adjudication’ 34 (2012) Loyola Los
Angeles International & Comparative Law Review Google Scholar 53
Mbengue, MM, ‘Scientific Fact-finding by International Courts and Tribunals’ 3
(2012) Journal of International Dispute Settlement Google Scholar 509
McCabe, MP, ‘Arbitral Discovery and the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal
Experience’ 20 (1986) The International Lawyer Google Scholar 499
McWhinney, E, Judicial Settlement of International Disputes: Jurisdiction,
Justiciability, and Judicial Law-Making on the Contemporary International Court
(The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff 1991 Google Scholar)
Mendelson, M, ‘Interim Measures of Protection in Cases of Contested
Jurisdiction’ 46 (1972) British Yearbook of International Law Google Scholar 259
Moreno, J, ‘Einstein on the Bench?: Exposing What Judges Do Not Know about
Science and Using Child Abuse Cases to Improve How Courts Evaluate Scientific
Evidence’ 64 (2003) Ohio State Law Journal Google Scholar 531
Mosk, R, ‘The Role of Facts in International Dispute Resolution’ 203 (2003)
Receuil des Cours - Collected Courses at the Hague Academy Google Scholar 11
Müller, D, ‘The Question Question’ in Milanović, M and Wood, M (eds), The Law
and Politics of the Kosovo Advisory Opinion (Oxford University Press, 2015
Google Scholar)
Murphy, SD, ‘The Experience of the Eritrea–Ethiopia Claims Commission’ 106
(2012) Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law)
Google Scholar 237
Niyungeko, G and Salmon, JAS, La preuve devant les juridictions internationales
(Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, Bruylant 2005 Google Scholar)
Nordquist, MH et al., United National Convention on the Law of the Sea (The
Hague, Martinus Nijhoff 1989 Google Scholar)
Öberg, MD, ‘The Legal Effects of Resolutions of the UN Security Council and
General Assembly in the Jurisprudence of the ICJ’ 16 (2005) European Journal of
International Law Google Scholar 879
O'Donnell, T, ‘Naming and Shaming: The Sorry Tale of Security Council Resolution
1530 (2004)’ 17 (2006) European Journal of International Law Google Scholar 945
O'Donnell, T, ‘Judicialising History or Historicising Law: Reflections on Irving
v. Penguin Books and Lipstadt ’ 62 (2012) Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly
Google Scholar 291
Oda, S, ‘Provisional Measures, The Practice of the International Court of
Justice’ in Lowe, V and Fitzmaurice, M (eds), Fifty Years of the International
Court of Justice (Cambridge University Press 1996 Google Scholar)
Oxman, B, ‘Jurisdiction and the Power to Indicate Provisional Measures’ in
Damrosch, LF (ed), The International Court of Justice at a Crossroads (Dobbs
Ferry NY, Transnational 1987 Google Scholar)
Palchetti, P, ‘Opening the International Court of Justice to Third States:
Intervention and Beyond’ 6 (2002) Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law
Google Scholar 139
Palchetti, P, ‘The Power of the International Court of Justice to Indicate
Provisional Measures to Prevent the Aggravation of a Dispute’ 21 (2008) Leiden
Journal of International Law Google Scholar 623
Palmeter, D and Mavroidis, PC, Dispute Settlement in the World Trade
Organization: Practice and Procedure (Cambridge University Press 2004 Google
Scholar)
Pauwelyn, J, ‘Evidence, Proof and Persuasion in WTO Dispute Settlement: Who
Bears the Burden?’ 1 (1998) Journal of International Economic Law Google Scholar
227
Pauwelyn, J, ‘The Use of Experts in WTO Dispute Settlement’ 51 (2002)
International and Comparative Law Quarterly Google Scholar 325
Payne, C, ‘Mastering the Evidence: Improving Fact-Finding by International
Courts’ 41 (2011) Environmental Law Journal Google Scholar 1191
Peat, D, ‘The Use of Court-Appointed Experts by the International Court of
Justice’ 84 (2014) British Yearbook of International Law Google Scholar 271
Peel, J Google Scholar, ‘Risk Regulation Under the WTO SPS Agreement: Science as
an International Normative Yardstick?’ Jean Monnet Working Paper 02/04
Peel, J, Science and Risk Regulation in International Law (Cambridge University
Press 2013 Google Scholar)
Pellet, A, ‘Strengthening the Role of the International Court of Justice as the
Principal Organ of the United Nations’ 3 (2004) The Law and Practice of
International Courts and Tribunals Google Scholar 159
Petculescu, I, ‘The Review of the United Nations Security Council Decisions by
the International Court of Justice’ 52 (2005) Netherlands International Law
Review Google Scholar 167
Peters, A, ‘International Dispute Settlement: A Network of Cooperational Duties’
14 (2003) European Journal of International Law Google Scholar 1
Quintana, JJ, ‘Procedural Developments at the International Court of Justice’ 10
(2011) The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals Google Scholar
135
Ragosta, JA, ‘Unmasking the WTO – Access to the DSB System: Can the WTO DSB Live
up to the Moniker World Trade Court’ 31 (1999) Law & Policy in International
Business Google Scholar 739
Ramcharan, BG, International Law and Fact-Finding in the Field of Human Rights
(The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff 1982 Google Scholar)
Reichler, PS, ‘The Impact of the Nicaragua Case on Matters of Evidence and
Fact-Finding’ 25 (2012) Leiden Journal of International Law Google Scholar 149
Reisman, WM, ‘Respecting One's Own Jurisprudence: A Plea to the International
Court of Justice’ 83 (1989) The American Journal of International Law Google
Scholar 312
Reisman, WM and Freedman, EE, ‘The Plaintiff's Dilemma: Illegally Obtained
Evidence and Admissibility in International Adjudication’ 76 (1982) American
Journal of International Law Google Scholar 737
Riddell, A, ‘Scientific Evidence in the International Court of Justice –
Problems and Possibilities’ 20 (2009) Finnish Yearbook of International Law
Google Scholar 229
Riddell, A and Plant, B, Evidence before the International Court of Justice
(London, British Institute of International and Comparative Law 2009 Google
Scholar)
Roberts, RCE, ‘The Lubanga Trial Chamber's Assessment of Evidence in Light of
the Accused's Right to the Presumption of Innocence’ 10 (2012) Journal of
International Criminal Justice Google Scholar 923
Rodenhäuser, T, ‘Progressive Development of International Human Rights Law: The
Reports of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Syrian
Arab Republic’ EJIL: Talk! 13 April 2013 Google Scholar
Rohan, CM, ‘Rules Governing the Presentation of Testimonial Evidence’ in Khan,
KAA, Buisman, C and Gosnell, C (eds), Principles of Evidence in International
Criminal Justice (Oxford University Press 2010 Google Scholar)
Romano, C, ‘The Role of Experts in International Adjudication’ in Le droit
international face aux enjeux environmentaux, Colloque d'Aix-en-Provence 2009,
Société Française Pour le Droit International (Paris, Pedone 2010 Google
Scholar)
Romano, C, ‘Trial and Error in International Judicialization’ in Romano, C,
Alter, K and Shany, Y (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication
(Oxford University Press 2013 Google Scholar)
Romano, C, ‘A Taxonomy of International Rule of Law Institutions’ 2 (2011)
Journal of International Dispute Settlement Google Scholar 241
Ronen, Y, ‘Participation of Non-State Actors in ICJ Proceedings’ 11 (2012) The
Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals Google Scholar 77
Rosenne, S, The Law and Practice of the International Court (, The Hague,
Martinus Nijhoff 1987–2005 Google Scholar)
Rosenne, S, Procedure in the International Court: A Commentary on the 1978 Rules
of the International Court of Justice (The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff 1983 Google
Scholar)
Rosenne, S, ‘Fact-Finding before the International Court of Justice’ in Rosenne,
S, Essays on International Law and Practice (Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff 2007
Google Scholar) 235
Rosenne, S, Provisional Measures in International Law: The International Court
of Justice and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (Oxford
University Press 2005 Google Scholar)
Rosenne, S, Essays on International Law and Practice (The Hague, Martinus
Nijhoff Publishers 2007 Google Scholar)
Rosenne, S and Ronen, Y, The Law and Practice of the International Court,
1920–2005 (, The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff 2006 Google Scholar)
Rosenne, S and Sohn, LB, United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 1982:
A Commentary, Vol 5 (The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff 1989 Google Scholar)
Saks, MJ, ‘Banishing ipse dixit: The impact of Kumho Tire on forensic
identification science’ 57 (2000) Washington & Lee Law Review Google Scholar 879
Samson, E, ‘Is Gaza Occupied? Redefining the Status of Gaza under International
Law’ 25 (2010) American University Law Review Google Scholar 915
Sanders, J, ‘Expert Witness Ethics’ 76 (2007) Fordham Law Review Google Scholar
1539
Sandifer, DV, Evidence before International Tribunals, Vol 13 (University Press
of Virginia 1975 Google Scholar)
Sandoval, JG and Sweeney-Samuelson, E, ‘Adjudicating Conflicts over Resources:
The ICJ's Treatment of Technical Evidence in the Pulp Mills Case’ 3 (2011)
Gottingen Journal of International Law Google Scholar 447
Scheinin, M, ‘Improving Fact-Finding in Treaty-Based Human Rights Mechanisms and
in the Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council’ in Bergsmo, M (ed)
Quality-Control in Fact-Finding (Florence, Torkel Opsahl 2013 Google Scholar)
Schill, S W, ‘The Overlooked Role of Arbitration in International Adjudication
Theory’ 4 ESIL Reflections 4 May 2015 Google Scholar
Schofield, C and Carleton, C, ‘Technical Considerations in Law of the Sea
Dispute Resolution’ in Elferink, A and Rothwell, DR (eds), Oceans Management in
the 21st Century: Institutional Frameworks and Responses (The Hague, Martinus
Nijhoff 2004 Google Scholar)
Schwarzenberger, G, International Law – As Applied by International Courts and
Tribunals (London, Stevens & Sons 1968 Google Scholar)
Schwebel, SM, Three Cases of Fact-Finding by the International Court of Justice
in International Law (Cambridge University Press 1994 Google Scholar)
Schwebel, SM, ‘Speech of the President of the International Court of Justice to
the General Assembly, A/52/PV.36, 27 October 1997 Google Scholar
Schwisfurth, T, ‘Article 34’ in Simma, B (ed), The Charter of the United
Nations: A Commentary (, Oxford University Press 2002 Google Scholar)
Scobbie, I, ‘Discontinuance in the International Court: The Enigma of the
Nuclear Tests Cases’ 41 (1992) International and Comparative Law Quarterly
Google Scholar 808
Scobbie, I, ‘Unchart(er)ed Waters?: Consequences of the Advisory Opinion on the
Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian
Territory for the Responsibility of the UN for Palestine’ 16 (2005) European
Journal of International Law Google Scholar 941
Scobbie, I, ‘Regarding/Disregarding: The Judicial Rhetoric of President Barak
and the International Court of Justice's Wall Advisory Opinion’ 5 (2006) Chinese
Journal of International Law Google Scholar 269
Shahabuddeen, M, Precedent in the World Court, Vol 13 (Cambridge University
Press 1996 Google Scholar)
Shany, Y, ‘Know Your Rights! The Flotilla Report and International Law Governing
Naval Blockades’ EJIL: Talk! 12 October 2010 Google Scholar
Shany, Y, ‘Faraway, So Close: The Legal Status of Gaza after Israel's
Disengagement’ 8 (2005) Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law Google
Scholar 369
Shaw, MN, ‘The Security Council and the International Court of Justice: Judicial
Drift and Judicial Function’ in Muller, AS (ed), The International Court of
Justice: Its Future Role After Fifty Years, Vol 3 (The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff
1997 Google Scholar)
Shelton, D, ‘The Participation of Non-Governmental Organisations in
International Judicial Proceedings’ 88 (1994) American Journal of International
Law Google Scholar 611
Shifman, BE, ‘Revitalization of the Permanent Court of Arbitration’ 23 (1995)
International Journal of Legal Information Google Scholar 284
Shoyer, AW and Solovy, EM, ‘The Process and Procedure of Litigating at the World
Trade Organization: A Review of the Work of the Appellate Body’ 31 (1999) Law &
Policy of International Business Google Scholar 677
Simma, B, ‘Article 92’ in Simma, B (ed), The Charter of the United Nations: A
Commentary (, Oxford University Press 2002 Google Scholar)
Simma, B, ‘The International Court of Justice and Scientific Expertise’ 106
(2012) Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law)
Google Scholar 230
Simons, M, ‘Serbia's Darkest Pages Hidden from Genocide Court’ The New York
Times (New York, 8 April 2007 Google Scholar),
www.nytimes.com/2007/04/08/world/europe/08iht-serbia.5.5192285.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all
Simons, M, ‘Genocide Court Ruled for Serbia Without Seeing Full War Archive’ The
New York Times (New York, 9 April 2007 Google Scholar),
www.nytimes.com/2007/04/09/world/europe/09archives.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all
Sinclair, I, ‘Some Procedural Aspects of Recent International Litigation’ 30
(1981) International and Comparative Law Quarterly Google Scholar 338
Sinclair, I, The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (, Manchester
University Press 1984 Google Scholar)
Singh, A, ‘Expert Evidence’ in Khan, KAA, Buisman, C and Gosnell, C (eds),
Principles of Evidence in International Criminal Justice (Oxford University
Press 2010 Google Scholar)
Singh, N, The Role and Record of the International Court of Justice (The Hague,
Martinus Nijhoff 1989 Google Scholar)
Steger, D, ‘Amicus Curiae: Participant or Friend? The WTO and NAFTA Experience’
in Bogdandy, A von et al. (eds), European Integration and International
Coordination: Studies in Honour of Claus-Dieter Ehlermann (The Hague, Kluwer
2011 Google Scholar) 419
Steger, DP and Bossche, P Van den, ‘WTO Dispute Settlement: Emerging Practice
and Procedure’ 92 (1998) Proceedings of the American Society of International
Law Google Scholar 79
Stein, T and Richter, S, ‘Article 36’ in Simma, B and Mosler, H (eds), The
Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary (Oxford University Press 1996 Google
Scholar)
Stuyt, AAM, Survey of International Arbitrations: 1794–1989 (The Hague, Martinus
Nijhoff 1990 Google Scholar)
Talmon, S, ‘The Security Council as World Legislature’ 99 (2005) The American
Journal of International Law Google Scholar 175
Talmon, S, ‘Article 43’ in Zimmermann, A et al. (eds), The Statute of the
International Court of Justice (, Oxford University Press 2012 Google Scholar)
Tams, CJ, ‘Article 49’ in Zimmermann, A (ed), The Statute of the International
Court of Justice: A Commentary (Oxford University Press 2006 Google Scholar)
Tams, CJ, ‘Article 50’ in Zimmermann, A (ed), The Statute of the International
Court of Justice: A Commentary (Oxford University Press 2006 Google Scholar)
Tams, CJ ‘Article 51’ in Zimmermann, A (ed), The Statute of the International
Court of Justice: A Commentary (Oxford University Press 2006 Google Scholar)
Tams, CJ and Devaney, JG, ‘Applying Necessity and Proportionality to
Anti-Terrorist Self-Defence’ 45 (2012) Israel Law Review Google Scholar 91
Tams, CJ and Sloan, J (eds), The Development of International Law by the
International Court of Justice (Oxford University Press 2013 Google Scholar)
Teitelbaum, R, ‘Recent Fact-Finding Developments at the International Court of
Justice’ 6 (2007) The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals
Google Scholar 184
Terris, D, Romano, CP and Swigart, L, The International Judge: An Introduction
to the Men and Women Who Decide the World's Cases (Oxford University Press 2007
Google Scholar)
Thirlway, H, ‘Dilemma or Chimera – Admissibility of Illegally Obtained Evidence
in International Adjudication’ 78 (1984) American Journal of International Law
Google Scholar 622
Thirlway, H, Non-appearance before the International Court of Justice (Cambridge
University Press 1985 Google Scholar)
Thirlway, H, ‘Normative Surrender and the Duty to Appear before the
International Court of Justice: A Reply’ 11 (1989) Michigan Journal of
International Law Google Scholar 912
Thirlway, H, ‘The Indication of Provisional Measures by the International Court
of Justice’ in Bernhardt, R (ed), Interim Measures Indicated by International
Courts (Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und
Völkerrecht, Springer-Verlag 1994 Google Scholar)
Thomson, L, ‘The ICJ and the Case Concerning the G/N Project: The Implications
for International Watercourses Law and International Environmental Law’ Centre
for Energy, Petroleum, Mineral Law and Policy, Annual Review (1999 Google
Scholar) Article 8, wwwdundeeacuk/cepmlp/car/html/car3_article8htm
Tomuschat, C Google Scholar, ‘Uniting for Peace’, United Nations Audiovisual
Library of International Law, www.un.org/law/avl
Treves, T, ‘Law and Science in the Interpretation of the Law of the Sea
Convention: Article 76 between the Law of the Sea Tribunal and the Commission on
the Limits of the Continental Shelf’ 3 (2012) Journal of International Dispute
Settlement Google Scholar 483
Tzanakopoulos, A, ‘Provisional Measures Indicated by International Courts:
Emergence of a General Principle of International Law’ 57 (2004) Revue
Hellénique de droit international Google Scholar 53
Ulfstein, G, ‘Awarding Compensation in a Fragmented Legal System: The Diallo
Case’ 4 (2013) Journal of International Dispute Settlement Google Scholar 477
Ulfstein, G, ‘Treaty Bodies and Regimes’ in Hollis, D (ed), Oxford Guide to
Treaties (Oxford University Press 2012 Google Scholar)
Unterhalter, D, ‘Allocating the Burden of Proof in WTO Dispute Settlement
Proceedings’ 42 (2009) Cornell International Law Journal Google Scholar 209
Unterhalter, D, ‘The Burden of Proof in WTO Dispute Settlement’ in Janow, ME,
Donaldson, V and Yanovich, A (eds), The WTO: Governance, Dispute Settlement &
Developing Countries (Huntington NY, Juris 2008 Google Scholar)
Valencia-Ospina, E, ‘Evidence before the International Court of Justice’ 1(1999)
International Law Forum du droit international Google Scholar 202
Bossche, P Van den and Zdouc, W, The Law and Policy of the World Trade
Organization (, Cambridge University Press 2013 Google Scholar)
Hout, T Van den, ‘Resolution of International Disputes: The Role of the
Permanent Court of Arbitration – Reflections on the Centenary of the 1907
Convention for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes’ 21 (2008)
Leiden Journal of International Law Google Scholar 643
Wyngaert, C Van den, ‘International Criminal Courts as Fact (and Truth) Finders
in Post-Conflict Societies: Can Disparities with Ordinary International Courts
be Avoided?’100 (2006) Proceedings of the Annual Meeting, American Society of
International Law Google Scholar, 55
Hof, JJ van Haersolte-van, ‘The Revitalization of the Permanent Court of
Arbitration’ 54 (2007) Netherlands International Law Review Google Scholar 395
Verkerk, R, ‘Comparative Aspects of Expert Evidence in Civil Litigation’ 13
(2009) International Journal of Evidence and Proof Google Scholar 167
Sellers, P Viseur, ‘Rule 89 (C) and (D): At Odds or Overlapping with Rule 96 and
Rule 95?’ in May, R et al. (eds), Essays on ICTY Procedure and Evidence in
Honour of Gabrielle Kirk McDonald (The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff 2001 Google
Scholar)
Mangoldt, H Von and Zimmermann, A, ‘Article 53’ in Simma, B et al. (eds), The
Statute of the International Court of Justice (Oxford University Press 2006
Google Scholar)
Walter, C, ‘Article 44’ in Zimmermann, A (ed), The Statute of the International
Court of Justice: A Commentary (Oxford University Press 2006 Google Scholar)
Watson, GR, ‘Constitutionalism, Judicial Review, and the World Court’ 34 (1993)
Harvard International Law Journal Google Scholar 1
Watts, SA, ‘Burden of Proof and Evidence before the ICJ’ in Weiss, F (ed),
Improving WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures: Issues and Lessons from the
Practice of Other International Courts and Tribunals (London, Cameron May 2000
Google Scholar)
Watts, SA, ‘Enhancing the Effectiveness of Procedures of International Dispute
Settlement’ 21(2001) Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law Google Scholar 21
Weckel, P, ‘Le Chapitre VII de la Charte et son application par le Conseil de
Sécurité’ 37 (1991) Annuaire français de droit international Google Scholar 165
Weissbrodt, D and McCarthy, J, ‘Fact-Finding by International Nongovernmental
Human Rights Organizations’ 22 (1981) Virginia Journal of International Law
Google Scholar 1
Wellens, K, ‘Happy Birthday to the “Respected Old Lady”’ ESIL Newsletter Vol 18,
June 2015 Google Scholar
Wilkinson, S, ‘Standards of Proof in International Humanitarian and Human Rights
Fact-Finding and Inquiry Missions’, Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian
Law and Human Rights 2012 Google Scholar
Wolfrum, R Google Scholar, ‘International Courts and Tribunals, Evidence’ Max
Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law
Wolfrum, R Google Scholar, ‘Interim (Provisional) Measures of Protection’ in
Wolfrum R (ed) Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (online
edition) http://opil.ouplaw.com/home/EPIL
Yang, G, Mercurio, B and Li, Y, WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding: A Detailed
Interpretation, Vol 7 (The Hague, Kluwer Law International 2005 Google Scholar)
METRICS
ALTMETRIC ATTENTION SCORE
Altmetric score 20; more details for Fact Finding before the International Court
of Justice in a new tab
See more details on altmetric attention score
Blogged by 2 - show details
Posted by 8 X users - show details
2 readers on Mendeley
FULL TEXT VIEWS
Full text views help
Close Full text views help
Full text views reflects the number of PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive,
Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views for chapters in this book.
Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...
BOOK SUMMARY PAGE VIEWS
Book summary page views help
Close Book summary page views help
Book summary views reflect the number of visits to the book and chapter landing
pages.
Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...
* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated
every 24 hours.
Usage data cannot currently be displayed.
OUR SITE
* Accessibility
* Contact & Help
* Legal Notices
OUR PLATFORMS
* Cambridge Core
* Cambridge Open Engage
* Cambridge Higher Education
OUR PRODUCTS
* Journals
* Books
* Elements
* Textbooks
* Courseware
JOIN US ONLINE
*
*
*
*
*
Location
Please choose a valid location.
Update
Legal Information
* Rights & Permissions
* Copyright
* Privacy Notice
* Terms of Use
* Cookies Policy
Cambridge University Press 2024
Cancel
Confirm
×
Share
Close
CITATION TOOLS
Copy and paste a formatted citation or download in your chosen format
Loading citation...
×