washingtonpost.com.cz03149.tw1.ru
Open in
urlscan Pro
2a03:6f00:6:1::b972:f56b
Public Scan
URL:
http://washingtonpost.com.cz03149.tw1.ru/
Submission: On April 14 via api from US — Scanned from DE
Submission: On April 14 via api from US — Scanned from DE
Form analysis 1 forms found in the DOM
<form class="transition-all duration-200 ease-in-out flex mt-xxs items-center">
<div class="transition-all duration-200 ease-in-out"><button type="submit" data-qa="sc-newsletter-signup-button" class="wpds-c-kSOqLF wpds-c-kSOqLF-bywHgD-variant-primary wpds-c-kSOqLF-eHdizY-density-default wpds-c-kSOqLF-ejCoEP-icon-left">Sign
up</button></div>
</form>Text Content
Accessibility statementSkip to main content Democracy Dies in Darkness Subscribe Sign in Subscribe Home Page Politics Chevron Right Opinions Chevron Right War in Ukraine Investigations Climate Chevron Right Well+Being Chevron Right Tech Chevron Right Lifestyle Chevron Right World Chevron Right D.C., Md. & Va. Chevron Right Sports Chevron Right Home Page Abortion Arts & Entertainment Chevron Right Business Chevron Right Carolyn Hax Classifieds Climate Chevron Right Climate Solutions Coronavirus Chevron Right Crosswords Chevron Right D.C., Md. & Va. Chevron Right Education Chevron Right Food Chevron Right Gender & Identity Chevron Right Health Chevron Right History Chevron Right Immigration Investigations Jobs Lifestyle Chevron Right Media Morning Mix National National Security Chevron Right Newsletters & Alerts Obituaries Opinions Chevron Right Photography Chevron Right Podcasts Politics Chevron Right Puzzles & Games Chevron Right Reader Q&As Religion Science Chevron Right Sports Chevron Right Tech Transportation Travel: By The Way Chevron Right Video Games: Launcher Video Chevron Right Washington Post Live Weather Chevron Right Well+Being Chevron Right World Chevron Right WP Creative Group Advertisement Close The Washington PostDemocracy Dies in Darkness EnvironmentClimate Weather Climate Solutions Animals Climate Lab Green Living EnvironmentClimate Weather Climate Solutions Animals Climate Lab Green Living COLORADO RIVER CITIES AND FARMS FACE DIRE TRADE-OFFS WITH NEW FEDERAL REVIEW THE FEDERAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT REVEALS THE DILEMMA BETWEEN FOLLOWING LEGAL WATER RIGHTS OR SPREADING CUTS EVENLY AMONG STATES By Joshua Partlow Updated April 11, 2023 at 7:47 p.m. EDT|Published April 11, 2023 at 2:00 p.m. EDT Water flows through Navajo Canyon in Page, Ariz., in October. The water in Navajo Canyon connects with Lake Powell, which feeds into the Colorado River. (Joshua Lott/The Washington Post) Listen 9 min Comment on this storyComment1734 Gift Article Share The Biden administration on Tuesday moved closer to imposing unprecedented cuts in how much water Arizona, California and Nevada could pull from the Colorado River, while raising the possibility that these reductions could be distributed in ways that contradict long-standing water rights that favor powerful farming regions. Want to know how your actions can help make a difference for our planet? Sign up for the Climate Coach newsletter, in your inbox every Tuesday and Thursday.ArrowRight In releasing a new environmental review of how to operate the Colorado River’s major reservoirs, the Interior Department detailed the painful dilemma facing the American West after a two-decade drought and chronic overuse. Interior officials also defended Secretary Deb Haaland’s right to make cuts in a proportional way in times of emergency even if that goes against water rights held by farming communities from more than a century ago. Story continues below advertisement Over the past year, the seven states of the Colorado River basin have been unable to reach an agreement among themselves to make major cuts to protect the reservoirs. The federal government expects to make a decision on how reductions could be distributed by August. Amid the tables of numbers and technical jargon in the draft environmental review, the three options the Interior Department proposes for consideration expose the stark decision in the coming months. One option would strictly follow water rights and give priority to farming regions in California, such as the Imperial Valley, that stock supermarkets across the country with winter vegetables — while letting a large part of the water supply of Phoenix and Los Angeles “get taken virtually to zero,” as Interior Department Deputy Secretary Tommy Beaudreau put it in an interview. Another option would distribute up to 2 million acre-feet of cuts in water usage — more than 15 percent of the river’s average flow over the past two decades — in the same percentage across all users in Arizona, California and Nevada. That would be different from how cuts have been distributed in the past. Story continues below advertisement Both federal and state officials have warned that the third option, changing nothing, would be the worst of all. That’s because climate change and the drying of the West have put the reservoirs of Lake Powell and Lake Mead — the water supply for tens of millions of people — on a path toward falling so far that the dams could no longer produce hydropower, or even hit “dead pool,” when water would effectively be blocked from flowing to the southern states. If no action is taken, “we can expect water levels to continue to decline, threatening the operations of the system, and the water supply of 40 million people,” U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Commissioner Camille Calimlim Touton said Tuesday from a conference room at the Hoover Dam. Through the windows behind her, the bleached “bathtub ring” on the hillside above Lake Mead was clearly visible — a reminder of how far the reservoir, now about a quarter full, has fallen over the past two decades of drought. “Some may believe that this winter’s snow and rain has saved the river, but that is not the case,” said Tom Buschatzke, director of the Arizona Department of Water Resources. “We have a lot of hard work and difficult decisions ahead of us in this basin.” Workers harvest romaine lettuce from the fields at the Elmore Desert Ranch in Brawley, Calif., last month. (Ricky Carioti/The Washington Post) State officials expressed the desire for all seven Colorado River basin states to reach an agreement over the next few months and avoid the need for the federal government to impose cuts unilaterally. Federal officials described the two alternatives they laid out — strictly following water rights, or making cuts of the same percentage across California, Arizona and Nevada — as “bookends” on a spectrum, giving state officials direction to seek compromise in between. Advertisement Story continues below advertisement “It gives us the framework … on which we can build and perhaps find something that is partway between those two bookends,” said Estevan Lopez, New Mexico’s representative on the Upper Colorado River Commission. “I think that’s our challenge right now.” The goal of the document is to assess potential rule changes for how water is released from Lake Powell and Lake Mead to protect these reservoirs from falling below what is known as “minimum power pool.” That’s the point at which the Glen Canyon and Hoover dams can no longer produce hydropower because there is not enough water to flow through the turbines safely. These reservoir elevations — about 3,500 feet above sea level at Lake Powell and 950 feet at Lake Mead — will be the thresholds that the federal government is working to avoid. Lake Powell stands just 20 feet above that level and is less than a quarter full. “Our fundamental assumption is we’re protecting the system and we’re not going to allow shortages to bring the system below those elevations,” Beaudreau said. Advertisement Story continues below advertisement The unusually wet and snowy winter in the West has eased some of the most dire predictions for immediate cuts. The 2.083 million acre-feet ceiling on cuts that the environmental review establishes is at the low end of the 2 million-to-4 million acre-feet range that Touton, the Bureau of Reclamation commissioner, called for last summer. Beaudreau said that he was “comfortable with that number” and that it would be the “outer bounds” of what the federal government would consider cutting heading into next year. It also gives the seven states of the Colorado River basin something to shoot for, he said, as they develop programs to conserve water by paying farmers not to plant crops and making other improvements to improve the efficiency of irrigation. An acre-foot is about 326,000 gallons, what it would take to cover an acre of land with a foot of water. Advertisement Story continues below advertisement The Biden administration has set aside billions of dollars from new legislation to fund payments for drought resilience and to encourage such water savings. The more cuts to water usage that can be made voluntarily within the states would reduce the amount the federal government might impose unilaterally. In some ways, the options presented in the environmental review mirror the proposals that the seven basin states have been wrestling with this year. In January, six of the states — Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico, Colorado, Utah and Wyoming — agreed on an approach that would make major cuts in a proportional way among states. That would hit California farmers in places such as the Imperial Valley — who suck up a lot of the river and have rights to it that predate some cities — particularly hard. California, the largest user of Colorado River water, rejected that approach, and called for cuts that adhered to water rights priority. The plan would be devastating to Arizona, state officials there say. The Central Arizona Project that diverts water from the Colorado River is seen on in Maricopa County, Ariz., in August. (Matt McClain/The Washington Post) The states have so far failed to reach an agreement on voluntary cuts. Advertisement Story continues below advertisement But Tuesday’s environmental review also establishes a different way to justify the reductions. The six-state plan rationalized departing from a strict adherence to water rights by attributing some 1.5 million acre-feet of cuts to evaporation and other losses as water travels down the canals from the major reservoirs. But the federal government’s second alternative — the one for proportional cuts — is based not on evaporation but on Haaland’s legal authority to protect the river. “In our mind, the appropriate presentation is grounded in the secretary’s authorities to provide for human health and safety, manage the system under emergency conditions, and provide for beneficial use,” Beaudreau said. “It is the secretary’s responsibility, and she has the authority, to protect the system.” Story continues below advertisement Haaland’s authority could be at issue if states decide to bring lawsuits challenging the federal government’s decision. The threat of litigation has hung over this process from the beginning, and many worry that a prolonged legal battle would delay taking action and let the reservoirs continue to fall. Advertisement “We have to avoid that outcome,” said Buschatzke, with the Arizona Department of Water Resources. “Litigation that might take 10 or 15 or 20 years is going to be occurring while the system and the lake behind us is going to crash.” Colorado River Board of California Chairman J.B. Hamby, who is also a board member of the Imperial Irrigation District, said California is “looking to develop a true seven-state consensus” over the next two months. Story continues below advertisement While the Interior Department did not say which option it preferred, Beaudreau acknowledged that “nobody’s advocating” for the path that strictly follows water rights seniority and would cut off major cities such as Phoenix and Los Angeles from big portions of their water supply. “Even California would say that’s not what we want,” he said. “But we think analytically it’s important to show if you just follow strict priority and you had to cut 2 million acre-feet out of the system, this is what would happen.” Advertisement Now that the environmental review has been published, a public comment period will last for 45 days. Haaland is expected to choose an option this summer. By August, Lake Powell and Lake Mead will have new rules for how much water comes out of the dams and flows to the Southwest. “We’re on a little bit of a merry-go-round. We got to get off the merry-go-round. We need to have an outcome,” Buschatzke said. “I think we lose confidence of the public if they don’t see us taking major steps, creating an outcome in which we are stabilizing the system for a long time out into the future.” 1734 Comments GiftOutline Gift Article By Josh Partlow Joshua Partlow is a reporter on the The Washington Post’s national desk. He has served previously as the bureau chief in Mexico City, Kabul, Rio de Janeiro, and as a correspondent in Baghdad. Twitter More From The Post * Special counsel focuses on Trump fundraising off false election claims April 11, 2023 * Manhattan DA sues Rep. Jim Jordan for ‘brazen’ attack on Trump probe April 10, 2023 * Opinion|Matthew Kacsmaryk calls the right-leaning judicial branch’s bluff April 11, 2023 * Biden to remake U.S. auto industry with toughest emissions limits ever April 11, 2023 * Judge blasts Fox News over ‘missing’ evidence, orders investigation April 11, 2023 Subscribe to comment and get the full experience. Choose your plan → View more NewsletterThursdays Energy and Environment The latest news about climate change, energy and the environment, delivered every Thursday. Sign up I agree to The Washington Post's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.* MOST READ Climate * 1 America needs clean electricity. These states show how to do it. * 2 Advice|Buy an electric vehicle now or wait? Here’s how to decide. * 3 Biden to remake U.S. auto industry with toughest emissions limits ever * 4 What is Willow? How an Alaska oil project could affect the environment. * 5 Seas have drastically risen along southern U.S. coast in past decade TOP STORIES Opinions from our Editorial Board Views from The Post’s Editorial Board on current events Opinion|‘A free China’: Why the words of a jailed dissident should be read far and wide Opinion|Tennessee’s GOP governor wants to do something about guns. Really. Opinion|The U.S. just hit a major jobs milestone last seen in 2001 Refresh Try a different topic Sign in or create a free account to save your preferences MOST READ * 1 Leaker of U.S. secret documents worked on military base, friend says * 2 No Russia-Ukraine peace talks expected this year, U.S. leak shows * 3 Advice|8 hilarious but true wildlife tips from the National Park Service * 4 Special counsel focuses on Trump fundraising off false election claims * 5 Are you ableist? Take our quiz to learn more about disability bias. Company * About The Post * Newsroom Policies & Standards * Diversity and Inclusion * Careers * Media & Community Relations * WP Creative Group * Accessibility Statement Get The Post * * Become a Subscriber * Gift Subscriptions * Mobile & Apps * Newsletters & Alerts * Washington Post Live * Reprints & Permissions * Post Store * Books & E-Books * Newspaper in Education * Print Archives (Subscribers Only) * Today’s Paper * Public Notices Contact Us * Contact the Newsroom * Contact Customer Care * Contact the Opinions team * Advertise * Licensing & Syndication * Request a Correction * Send a News Tip * Report a Vulnerability Terms of Use * Digital Products Terms of Sale * Print Products Terms of Sale * Terms of Service * Privacy Policy * Cookie Settings * Submissions & Discussion Policy * RSS Terms of Service * Ad Choices washingtonpost.com © 1996-2023 The Washington Post * washingtonpost.com * © 1996-2023 The Washington Post * About The Post * Contact the Newsroom * Contact Customer Care * Request a Correction * Send a News Tip * Report a Vulnerability * Download the Washington Post App * Policies & Standards * Terms of Service * Privacy Policy * Cookie Settings * Print Products Terms of Sale * Digital Products Terms of Sale * Submissions & Discussion Policy * RSS Terms of Service * Ad Choices