www.holocaust.claims Open in urlscan Pro
193.243.189.60  Public Scan

Form analysis
2 forms found in the DOM

GET https://www.holocaust.claims/

<form role="search" method="get" action="https://www.holocaust.claims/" class="wp-block-search__button-inside wp-block-search__text-button aligncenter wp-block-search"><label for="wp-block-search__input-1" class="wp-block-search__label">I'd like to
    learn more about...</label>
  <div class="wp-block-search__inside-wrapper "><input type="search" id="wp-block-search__input-1" class="wp-block-search__input" name="s" value="" placeholder="" required=""><button type="submit"
      class="wp-block-search__button wp-element-button">Search</button></div>
</form>

POST https://www.holocaust.claims/wp-comments-post.php

<form action="https://www.holocaust.claims/wp-comments-post.php" method="post" id="commentform" class="comment-form" novalidate="">
  <p class="comment-notes"><span id="email-notes">Your email address will not be published.</span> <span class="required-field-message">Required fields are marked <span class="required">*</span></span></p>
  <p class="comment-form-comment"><label for="comment">Comment <span class="required">*</span></label> <textarea id="comment" name="comment" cols="45" rows="8" maxlength="65525" required=""></textarea></p>
  <p class="comment-form-author"><label for="author">Name <span class="required">*</span></label> <input id="author" name="author" type="text" value="" size="30" maxlength="245" autocomplete="name" required=""></p>
  <p class="comment-form-email"><label for="email">Email <span class="required">*</span></label> <input id="email" name="email" type="email" value="" size="30" maxlength="100" aria-describedby="email-notes" autocomplete="email" required=""></p>
  <p class="comment-form-url"><label for="url">Website</label> <input id="url" name="url" type="url" value="" size="30" maxlength="200" autocomplete="url"></p>
  <p class="comment-form-cookies-consent"><input id="wp-comment-cookies-consent" name="wp-comment-cookies-consent" type="checkbox" value="yes"> <label for="wp-comment-cookies-consent">Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time
      I comment.</label></p>
  <p class="form-submit"><input name="submit" type="submit" id="submit" class="submit" value="Post Comment"> <input type="hidden" name="comment_post_ID" value="3286" id="comment_post_ID">
    <input type="hidden" name="comment_parent" id="comment_parent" value="0">
  </p>
</form>

Text Content

Menu
 * Home
 * *Holocaust Dramatizations*
 * Resources
 * About
 * Contact

Menu

I'd like to learn more about...
Search

Do you find yourself wanting to learn more after reading an article? Then just
keep scrolling and the articles will just keep coming!


THE ALLIES SAID WHAT?!? PART ONE

Posted on August 8, 2023August 10, 2023 by GreatMystery

Part 2

Michael Peinovich has graciously given me permission to use the research he used
from the opening of a recent Holocaust debate that he participated in. Today
also marks a change in using the term Holocaust fabulists instead of Holocaust
affirmers, an apt term coined by Joseph Jordan (a.k.a., Eric Striker).



Holocaust fabulists will often tout entries from diaries, excerpts from
speeches, and so on to bolster their claims that Germans committed genocide
against European Jews. The fabulists must resort to this as there is a
noticeable lack of physical evidence. An excerpt from a speech known as
“Hitler’s prophecy” is a favorite out-of-context quote that fabulists like to
invoke. Wikipedia describes the prophecy thusly:

Image Source

I have previously written about this topic here and here. To summarize, Hitler
is talking about the end of Jewish political power in Europe. However, I did not
bring up the prophecy to rehash what its true meaning is, but rather to use it
as a reference point.

Oftentimes meanings get lost in translation, sometimes unintentionally,
sometimes not. The latter is certainly the case with Hitler’s prophecy. This
factor will not be a problem with the quotes of the Allies that I am going to
provide, as they were made in English by the Western Allies, therefore there can
be no funny business with translation.

Before we get into that, I would like to quote Peinovich’s statement regarding
these Allied quotes:

“Speaking of the Allies, let’s ask the question: what would documents,
quotations, and diary entries from top government and military officials that
were actually engaged in a conspiracy to commit mass killings of civilians look
like? As it turns out, we don’t have to look far. We can simply look at the
record from the Allied side. They openly discussed plans to murder mass numbers
of civilians, discussed carrying out the murders, and issued documents assessing
the effectiveness of the murders after the fact. The evidence here is so
voluminous that I could not possibly include it all, so I will select only a few
items. However, unlike my [debate] opponent, my selections will be exemplary of
the vast body of evidence and will require no deliberately malicious or
mendacious interpretation. Nor are these documents, quotations, or mass killings
disputed by any historians, or anyone at all.”

On July 8, 1940, Winston Churchill wrote a letter to Lord Beaverbrook, the
Minister of Aircraft Production. In it he said the following:

“When I look round to see how we can win the war, I see that there is only one
sure path. We have no continental ally which can defeat the German military
power…. Should [Hitler] be repulsed here or not try invasion, he will recoil
eastward, and we have nothing to stop him. But there is one thing that will
bring
him back and bring him down, and that is an absolutely devastating,
exterminating attack by very heavy bombers from this country upon the Nazi
homeland.”

An “exterminating attack,” you say? Was Churchill planning to commit genocide
against all ethnically German people? About this quote Peinovich said:

“Based on arguments my opponent will make [in the debate] concerning certain
phrases in Goebbels’
diary, he must also assert that there was definitely a plan to kill literally
all the Germans by Winston Churchill in July of 1940. If he does not assert
this, it will be interesting to hear his explanation as to why not. Perhaps
because there is no evidence of such a program? Maybe because one statement does
not prove the existence of such a program? Maybe even because no matter what
Churchill said in one letter, the actual plan was to kill civilians to force a
surrender, not to kill literally every single German? Perhaps he will even go so
far as to state that we need only look at other statements by Churchill to
demonstrate this? Those would be interesting arguments indeed!”

Let’s compare and contrast what Churchill said with a directive from Hermann
Göring, one of the most powerful figures in the Nazi Party, to the Luftwaffe on
June 30, 1940:

“The war against England is to be restricted to destructive attacks against
industry and air force targets which have weak defensive forces. … The most
thorough study of the target concerned, that is vital points of the target, is a
pre-requisite for success. It is also stressed that every effort should be made
to avoid unnecessary loss of life amongst the civilian population”

Huh. That’s not the kind of thing the average person with a Hollywood-fed
perception of Nazis would expect a Nazi to say. It’s almost like those kind of
Nazi statements are purposely kept away from the average person.

On March 30, 1942 the British Cabinet sent a memorandum to Winston Churchill,
which he approved, that has since become known as the “dehousing paper.” The
following is that memo as reproduced by Wikipedia:

“The following seems a simple method of estimating what we could do by bombing
Germany.

Careful analysis of the effects of raids on Birmingham, Hull and elsewhere have
shown that, on the average, one ton of bombs dropped on a built-up area
demolishes 20–40 dwellings and turns 100–200 people out of house and home.

We know from our experience that we can count on nearly fourteen operational
sorties per bomber produced. The average lift of the bombers we are going to
produce over the next fifteen months will be about 3 tons. It follows that each
of these bombers will in its life-time drop about 40 tons of bombs. If these are
dropped on built-up areas they will make 4000–8000 people homeless.

In 1938 over 22 million Germans lived in fifty-eight towns of over 100,000
inhabitants, which, with modern equipment, should be easy to find and hit. Our
forecast output of heavy bombers (including Wellingtons) between now and the
middle of 1943 is about 10,000. If even half the total load of 10,000 bombers
were dropped on the built-up areas of these fifty-eight German towns the great
majority of their inhabitants (about one-third of the German population) would
be turned out of house and home.

Investigation seems to show that having one’s home demolished is most damaging
to morale. People seem to mind it more than having their friends or even
relatives killed. At Hull signs of strain were evident, though only one-tenth of
the houses were demolished. On the above figures we should be able to do ten
times as much harm to each of the fifty-eight principal German towns. There
seems little doubt that this would break the spirit of the people.

Our calculation assumes, of course, that we really get one-half of our bombs
into built-up areas. On the other hand, no account is taken of the large
promised American production (6,000 heavy bombers in the period in question).
Nor has regard been paid to the inevitable damage to factories, communications,
etc, in these towns and the damage by fire, probably accentuated by breakdown of
public services.[2][3]” (My emphasis added.)

Yes, you read that right: the British plotted to make one third of German
civilians homeless. I was unable to find any criticism of this policy. But if it
were the Nazis who plotted to employ this tactic we’d never hear the end of it.
It would be in all the YouTube top 10 lists of bad things evil people do.

The following picture was provided by Wikipedia. Its caption reads, Typical bomb
damage in the Eilbek district of Hamburg, 1944 or 1945:

Image Source

I have said myself that we cannot judge these actions inside a vacuum. We must
consider that a war was going on. However, to only condemn the actions of the
losing side of the war is dishonest and unjust—especially when the thing they
are being condemned for is a great big lie!

Don’t go thinking the Americans were any better. Continue to part two where I
present the American treatment of Germans during WW2.

Category: General


LEAVE A REPLY CANCEL REPLY

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comment *

Name *

Email *

Website

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.




 * Auschwitz/Birkenau
 * Belzec
 * Buchenwald
 * Dachau
 * Einsatzgruppen
 * General
 * Majdanek
 * Off Topic
 * Other Camps
 * Revisionists
 * Sobibor
 * Survivors
 * Treblinka
 * Uncategorized

ADL Allied War Crimes Auschwitz/Birkenau Babi Yar Belzec Confession Cremation
Dead Bodies Dean Irebodd Debating the Holocaust Einsatzgruppen Elie Wiesel
Faurisson G. Rudolf Gas Chamber Size Historical Criticism Holocaust Affirmers
Holocaust Education Hunger Plan Kola Mass Graves Mattogno Meta Debunking Missing
People Müller Narrative Changes Nuremberg Trials Operation Reinhard Outdoor
Cremation Photographs Physical Evidence Pressac Rudolf Hoess Sobibor
Sonderkommando Soviet Propaganda Starvation Sturdy Colls Treblinka Death Camp
Typhus Unbelievable Tales Vrba Wannsee WW2 Allies Yad Vashem

 * September 2023
 * August 2023
 * July 2023
 * June 2023
 * May 2023
 * April 2023
 * March 2023
 * February 2023
 * January 2023
 * December 2022
 * November 2022
 * October 2022

© 2023 Holocaust Claims | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme
Menu
 * Home
 * *Holocaust Dramatizations*
 * Resources
 * About
 * Contact
 *