www.mightymousethechomo.com Open in urlscan Pro
2606:4700:3035::ac43:8f84  Public Scan

Form analysis
0 forms found in the DOM

Text Content

THE MIGHTY MOUSE SITUATION




OK, this is just an easy place to see everything, just because I got tired of
copying and pasting all the time, and putting links to things people weren't
actually going to follow. This should hopefully give you all the details in one
place.

This is publicly available information. Nothing here is implied about the
accuracy of said documents, but this is what the free, publicly available court
records, sex offender registration, and newspaper articles show. Clink on any
link to go to the source in a new tab. Click on any image or PDF file to see it
in a new tab.


SUMMARY

What is this? Why is this here? Who is this person? Mighty Mouse (real name
Christopher Wayne Yarborough) is an aspiring MMA and boxing fighter out of
Virginia. In the last few years, he has been involved with Street Beefs, an
organization I have helped support. It is an organization which attempts to
settle "beefs" by letting the people fight in unsanctioned events to attempt to
squash things, with all agreeing that it ends after that. Mighty Mouse was at
one time a very visible (in every way possible) member of the group, and used it
to promote his own potential fight career. If you've seen me share contents of a
heavily tattooed individual doing workouts, etc, on my social media, that's who
that is.

Right from the start, there was talk of sexual offense in his past, and he
readily admitted he was in the penitentiary for many years. Upon questioning,
his version of "facts" was that this was a gang-related thing, whereas the gang
he was in was "pimping out" the mother of the victim, and this fell under the
same statute in Virginia ("Carnal Knowledge") . Also, the original offense,
according to his version, was in 1998 (when he would have been 19), and he
allegedly violated some conditions in 2008 which led to his arrest and
sentencing at that time. As despicable as all this is, most of us presumably
chalked it up to "dumb 19 year old got involved in gang, caught up in something
nasty, and did time for it.". As recently as two days ago, he put up a video
stating this again. He's since deleted it.

Recently, some of his behaviour (unrelated to this) led to a break with Street
Beefs. That's when I remembered that the explanation at the time didn't really
make much sense to me, So some digging ensued. One bit of advice if you're lying
about easily found public information: Never piss off a computer geek. Ahem.


THE CASE

If you want to double-check this yourself (please do), here's how to do so:

 * Go to http://ewsocis1.courts.state.va.us/CJISWeb/circuit.jsp
 * Select "Culpeper Circuit Court"
 * At this point, you can either search by case number, or by name. The two
   cases are CR08000089-01 and CR08000089-02, and the full name is "Yarborough,
   Christopher Wayne"

Here's what you will find.


CASE 1, CR08000089-01

PDF of case PDF of pleadings Page 1 image Page 2 image Pleadings image PDF PDF


CASE 2, CR08000089-02

PDF of case PDF of pleadings Page 1 image Page 2 image Pleadings image PDF PDF


SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION

To find this, simply go to:
https://sex-offender.vsp.virginia.gov/sor/offenderDetails.html?regId=26086

PDF Image PDF


THE STATUTES

 * 18.2-63. Carnal knowledge of child between thirteen and fifteen years of age.
 * 19.2-128. Penalties for failure to appear.
 * Chapter 8, Article 3. Everything having to do with prostition is actually in
   these statutes.


THE NEWSPAPER ARTICLE

Keith Mikell unearthed this article, from the time of the arrest.

PDF Image PDF


ANALYSIS

Based on all this data, here is what we know:

He pled guilty to a violation of Virginia state statute 18.2-63

That is:

"Carnal knowledge of child between thirteen and fifteen years of age." (BTW,
it's "below 15", so she could only be 14 at the most).

Here is the statute, link above.

A. If any person carnally knows, without the use of force, a child thirteen years of age or older but under fifteen
years of age, such person shall be guilty of a Class 4 felony.

B. If any person carnally knows, without the use of force, a child thirteen years of age or older but under fifteen
years of age who consents to sexual intercourse and the accused is a minor and such consenting child is three
years or more the accused's junior, the accused shall be guilty of a Class 6 felony. If such consenting child is less
than three years the accused's junior, the accused shall be guilty of a Class 4 misdemeanor.

In calculating whether such child is three years or more a junior of the accused minor, the actual dates of birth
of the child and the accused, respectively, shall be used.

C. For the purposes of this section, (i) a child under the age of thirteen years shall not be considered a
consenting child and (ii) "carnal knowledge" includes the acts of sexual intercourse, cunnilingus, fellatio,
anilingus, anal intercourse, and animate and inanimate object sexual penetration."

None of that is a pimping charge. Anything having to do with prostitution is
covered in statutes 18.2-346 - 18.2-359. See link above. His court papers show a
Class 4 Felony, so that means he had option A above.

He keeps saying that the original offence is in 1998. Where is that? It shows
the offence in 2008, an arraignment, then he failed to appear. That is case
CR08000089-02, which is a felony contempt of court charge for failure to appear.
That is a violation of statute 19.2-128, link above.

Then his counsel withdrew on October 1st, 2008 (on the Carnal Knowledge Charge),
then again on October 20th, again on that charge (different lawyer?) Then he
eventually pled guilty on March 3rd, 2009, and got sentenced to 10 years with 6
suspended, and 5 years probation, which he terminated on March 12, 2018.

If, as he claims, this was a pimping charge from 1998 and he violated conditions
and that's what the 2008 mess is about, then I still have questions:

Was he charged with the wrong crime and pled guilty to carnal knowledge with a
13-14 year old when he didn't do it but was just pimping her mother? He violated
conditions in 2008 and was arrested for that, and got, in 2008, and arraignment,
pre-trial motions, no-showed because he was still out, arrested again, had two
counsels withdraw, another counsel appointed, then pled guilty? Since when do
condition violations get all that for just the condition violation?

On top of that, the newspaper article at the time of arrest clearly lists (just
like the court documents) the reason for arrest, and when the offense took
place. No mention of any charge in 1998.

Unless the court documents, sex offender registration, and newspaper article all
got it wrong, and there's also paperwork for a 1998 offence which no one can
find, nor will Mouse produce, nor is there anything else under his name in the
Culpepert Circuit Court, then this is what happened. As far as the "dumb 18 year
old" nonsense, cut the shit. As of present writing (August 14, 2019), the Sex
Offender Registration (renewed a few weeks ago) shows current age as 41. Court
records show date of birth as 07/31/****. Easy arithmethic gives us that the
date of birth is 07/31/1978, which makes him at the time of the offense, in
February 2008, 29 years of age. That is the age at which he committed those acts
on a 14 year old.

Draw your own conclusions.