amir.io Open in urlscan Pro
54.235.156.25  Public Scan

URL: https://amir.io/
Submission: On October 19 via api from US — Scanned from DE

Form analysis 2 forms found in the DOM

/archive

<form action="/archive" class="posthaven-archive-form">
  <input name="query" placeholder="Search this site..." type="text">
</form>

/posthaven/subscription

<form action="/posthaven/subscription" class="posthaven-subscribe-form posthaven-control">
  <a class="posthaven-anon posthaven-subscribe-prompt" href="javascript:void(0)">
<strong>Subscribe by email »</strong>
<span>We'll email you when there are new posts here.</span>

</a>
  <div class="posthaven-user-required" style="display:none">
    <div class="posthaven-user-unsubscribe" style="display: none"> You're following this blog. <a data-method="DELETE" href="javascript:void(0);">
Unfollow »
</a>
    </div>
    <div class="posthaven-user-subscribe">
      <a data-method="POST" href="javascript:void(0);">
Follow this Posthaven »
</a>
    </div>
  </div>
  <div class="posthaven-anon posthaven-subscribe-anon" style="display:none"> Enter your email address to get email alerts about new posts on this site. Unsubscribe anytime. <div class="posthaven-subscribe-error posthaven-form-error"
      style="display:none"> Email address is invalid. </div>
    <input name="email_address" placeholder="Email Address" type="text">
    <input type="submit" value="Subscribe">
  </div>
</form>

Text Content

Manage New Post Logout Login




AMIR.IO


THE MISSING MILES IN EDUCATION

I like to think of learning as a series of journeys. Those journeys have
starting points which could be an interest “I love penguins!”, inspiration “I
have an idea for a rocketship”, goal “I want to be a doctor” or challenge “my
math skill is holding me back”. The journeys needn’t have fixed end points and
some legs may be slow meandering explorations, others straight-line sprints.

An ideal education system would meet a learner wherever they are and help them
get to where they want to go next, using their preferred means of “transport”
and on their schedule. Schools are like intercity railroads linking the major
hubs. They should be complemented by a huge network of roads and vehicles since
few journeys just go from hub to hub.

Outschool is building that network to complement schools. We aim to fill the
first miles of motivation and pre-requisite skills and the last miles to achieve
a goal, get a job, finish a project, or get to a natural closure of a motivation
or interest. We want fill in all the middle miles of possible journeys and
schedules. We want to be every kid’s second school.

Could we build an education system that helps any learner on any journey? An
analogy to modern transport makes me think we can. Our first vehicle type is
small-group classes that meet over video chat. Teachers create the learning
journeys they’re excited to share. Together, we’re filling in many missing miles
in education.




Upvote Upvoted 3


4 responses   //   Posted 6 years ago


WHAT I LEARNED FROM MY FATHER

My father, Manusurali Hassanali Nathoo died in 2015 from Parkinsons. He was my
hero. He was gentle, softly spoken but strong in his convictions and reaction to
life's hardships. He was a great listener and a man of few words. It turns out
I'm a lot more like my Mum!

He was adventurous. He was Indian by origin but born and grew up in Kenya. He
moved to England to get his PhD in Physics and then married my Mum - a fellow
expat and physicist from Czechoslovakia. He became a businessman then a science
teacher. He visited California and had a soft spot for San Francisco. He was
proud of his family and achievements but felt betrayed by some of his brothers.

I valued his advice enormously. I wish I had dedicated more time to him and our
relationship when he was alive. I learned so much from him directly through what
he taught me, but also through how he acted and who he was. 

He gave me a set of mental and emotional tools that I use so frequently I'm
probably unaware of most. Here are some snippets of advice that I can remember:

 * Write the first sentence. Get started now, you can always revise it.
 * Courage isn’t lack of fears, it's continuing despite them.
   
 * College is for finding a wife.
 * Business is risk.
 * Being bored is your own fault. There are so many interesting details if you
   just look closely.
 * Why be happy with 9/10 when you could get 10/10?
   
 * Your preferences aren't set in stone, you get to decide whether you like
   vegetables or not.
 * You get to decide whether you're happy with what you've got: I only need a
   cup of tea and a book.
   
 * Don’t judge a book by its cover: I was robbed once by men wearing suits.
 * Beware of people who seek power over others.
 * Protect yourself. Just because something is unlikely doesn’t mean you won’t
   be unlucky.

There's more that I take as advice by trying to follow the example he set: be
kind; be happy; be different; you may need to move around the world to find a
place to make your home; tell a story; tell a joke; invest in learning; don't
rely on others.



As I write this I find it impossible to convey the depth of meaning to me
without the context, remembering the colors, his voice, how it felt. I guess to
truly learn something you have to be there and experience it for yourself.






Upvote Upvoted 9


9 responses   //   Posted 7 years ago


MY JOURNEY TO FOUNDING OUTSCHOOL

I was recently interviewed about my career and journey to creating Outschool for
the alumni magazine of St. John's College, Cambridge. This led to a lot of fond
reminiscing and hopes for the future of learning.

What did you study at St John’s and what are your abiding memories of the
college and your time here? 

I graduated in 2002 with a MEng in Electrical and Information Sciences. I
actually started out studying Maths, completed Part I and then switched to
Engineering for Part II. After a gap year at IBM and seeing engineer friends
building robots, I was itching for the creative and practical aspects of
engineering. 

I remember the intensity and focus needed to keep up with the academics while
juggling myriad other interests. I learned to row with the college boat club, to
fly with the University Air Squadron and to ballroom dance competitively. I
remember excitement of so many new experiences and people. I found friends I'm
still in touch with who liked the same ridiculous, nerdy jokes that I did, and
made me feel like I belonged. At the same time, everyone seemed so smart and
ambitious I felt constantly challenged to raise my game.

What did you take from your degree that has remained with you in your
professional life?


After graduating I went into software development at IBM. I've been in software
ever since and that isn't something I studied formally at college - I'm a
self-taught programmer from a young age. Although I haven't used much of the
maths and engineering topics I studied, there are many other skills I took from
my degree that I have used.


In the third year, one of the courses involved working in pairs to design and
build a compression algorithm. We competed with other teams on who could come up
with an algorithm which resulted in the best-looking compressed images given a
file size constraint. This was great practice for doing technical work in teams
and working to a deadline in a competitive environment. We ended up winning and
my lab partner, Kirsty, is now my wife.



Half of the credit for fourth year engineering came from an independent research
project - I worked on modeling "grey box" control systems. The project involved
long-term independent work on a speculative project with uncertain outcome. That
sounds a lot like the startups I've been involved in!

Switching from maths to engineering was tough. One of the first engineering
modules I took was designing electrical circuits. I kept trying to determine the
optimal circuit design and prove that it was "right" rather than using
heuristics to quickly find a design that satisfied the requirements. That switch
helped me understand that different domains need quite different ways of
thinking.

Tell us how you came to work in the field that you’re in and what you worked on
before this.


I'd enjoyed writing software as a hobby since I was 5 when my parents bought me
a BBC Micro computer to play games on. When I graduated in 2002, the software
industry and internet seemed well on their way to transforming business and
society as we knew it. Despite the 2001 dotcom bust, I thought the industry
would change the world in much larger ways than it already had. As Marc
Andreeson of Netscape later put it - software would "eat" the world.


So after graduating I joined IBM first working in software development and then
consultancy. I spent 5 years there but I'd always had the itch to start my own
company and eventually found the inspiration to do it in 2007. I left IBM with a
colleague, James Brady, and we teamed up with a friend, Patrick Buckley, who I
knew from his year at St John's with the MIT exchange program.


We sought investment for our product ideas and were surprised when this came
quickly from Y Combinator, a seed investment fund that was just getting started
in Silicon Valley. They were far faster and less risk-averse than the British
investors we were speaking to - they flew us out and wrote us a $20K cheque
after speaking with us for 20 minutes. We attended their program in Silicon
Valley for 3 months at the start of 2008 and I quickly fell in love with San
Francisco. By 2009, Kirsty and I had moved for what we thought would be a 1-2
year adventure. We're still here now with no plans to move.


After many twists and turns, we ended up building Trigger.io - a mobile
development platform that allowed web developers to easily create mobile apps
for iOS and Android using Javascript. It's a solid small business but didn't
achieve the growth we were looking for as a startup. So, in 2013 we did a deal
with Square - a larger startup that has now gone public on NYSE - to acquire the
team in exchange for stock. I spent 15 months at Square as they grew from 400 to
1,200 employees and approached IPO. I worked as a product manager
there, founding Square Payroll, a new product line for the company.


Tell us about Outschool – what the organization does, when/why it was founded,
its successes so far.

I founded Outschool with Nick Grandy and Mikhail Seregine after leaving Square
in 2015. Nick had previously been the first engineer at Airbnb and a product
manager at another education startup. Mikhail had helped build Amazon Mechanical
Turk and Google Consumer Surveys. 


Outschool's mission is to inspire kids to love learning by providing them with
innovative learning opportunities outside of the regular classroom. We're doing
that by creating a marketplace for live online classes for kids - you can think
of it as an "Airbnb for kids' classes". The classes are offered by independent
teachers and take place in small-groups over live video chat with assignments
and feedback between the live sessions. 


Families use Outschool's classes to accelerate their kids' learning, catch them
up in core subjects, or to pursue interests in subjects that are not typically
offered in regular school. We’re an alternative to expensive private school
education, personal tutors and other extra-curricular programs.

In 2016 we released an early private beta product at outschool.com and raised
$1.4M in investment from Y Combinator and a fund backed by Sesame Workshop, the
makers of Sesame Street, as well several other Silicon Valley investors. With
our private beta release, we brought on tens of thousands of families across all
US states and 24 countries. We launched publicly this summer and are now growing
fast after the back-to-school rush in the Fall.

In what ways is Outschool a pioneering organisation?

Rather than just using software in the classroom as a teaching tool, we're
looking to use it to transform the nature of the education system itself. We're
doing that by offering a new format for learning with a marketplace-based
approach.


Live online classes are a new learning format that have been made possible by
the evolution of group video chat technology and the bandwidth to support it.
They offer important benefits over other online and offline options:



Accessibility – Classes are accessible anywhere with an internet connection and
the cost is split between families offering a lower price point than private
tutoring.


Collaboration – Learners interact with a teacher and peers rather than studying
on their own. Social experiences enrich learning. Nothing can replace a great
mentor or exploring ideas with peers.


Choice – Families choose their teachers and their classes based on their needs
and interests. They choose from teachers across the world and are not limited by
the offerings of their local school or community.


Online community marketplaces, like Airbnb and Etsy, are amongst the great
innovations made possible by the web and we’ve applied this model to live online
learning. By letting learners choose their classes and teachers we deliver on
the promise of personalized learning to adapt education to individual needs.
Other models are inherently limited by a fixed curriculum and faculty.

Is digital learning the future of education?


Online learning is poised to play a much larger role in kids' education. We see
a future where in-person learning is enhanced by online learning to offer a
breadth and depth of educational opportunities not possible today. Most schools
can't offer a broad enough range of classes to allow kids to pursue all of their
interests and meet all of their unique educational needs. 

Individual creativity, differentiation and directly observable skills are
increasingly valued over standardized knowledge and credentials. So the future
education system will have to deliver “mass customization”, and I think that's
best delivered by an ecosystem of many different institutions. Schools will play
a part and so will new, online options.


Give us your take on the importance of independent learning, including any
interesting stories or encounters you’ve had that relate to the topic. 


My own experience with independent learning transformed my life. I taught myself
to code from age 5 because at the time you needed a lot of technical knowledge
just to start a computer game up from a command prompt. I aspired to write my
own computer games but no schools at the time had coding or computer science
courses. Seeing my interest, my parents found a retired economics professor who
had started teaching computer studies on the side.


Today, coding classes are relatively commonplace, but what's next? What are the
things that seem like niche toys today but will turn into the powerful tools
of tomorrow? Standardized curriculums are extremely important to provide a core
base of knowledge but I think kids will need more than that to be successful in
the future with technology driving fast change in the economy and workplace. The
parents of young kids now have grown up with the internet and they know that
following a "standard" path is no longer a sure thing. 


Independent learning outside of regular school isn't just about acquiring niche
or vocational skills. It's also about meeting and collaborating with others
around a shared interest. At Outschool, the most inspiring moments are when we
see learners join a class from diverse locations like California, Georgia, Utah,
Ohio, Canada, Russia and Australia. They learn with each other and explore a
shared interest led by a passionate teacher. In the current political
environment in the US, connecting learners from different backgrounds, cultures
and views seems more important than ever. Luckily for us, we see this everyday.

What are the challenges of running such an organisation?


Our biggest challenge is awareness. As awareness of Outschool's offering grows,
we’ll be able to attract more teachers and classes, which in turn will attract
more parents and students to fill more courses. And as we grow, we’ll need to
work to make more traditional institutions see live online courses as a way to
enhance in-person curriculums.


In a big company you can use the existing brand and credibility to open doors,
get attention and acquire customers. With a startup you only have the vision,
the quality of your early product and ability to move fast. You compete on your
merits with limited resources. People have described building a startup as like
trying to fly an aircraft without an engine, and frantically trying to build and
attach that while plummeting to earth! It's challenging but I love it. With 10
years of experience building technology products and teams I feel in my element.


What are your hopes for the future of Outschool?



Our goal is to reach millions of families worldwide and have them learn and
connect through live online classes. To do that we’ll keep recruiting teachers
and have them bring their creativity and passion to our marketplace. It is the
quality and range of the classes offered that brings families to our site. I'd
like to see interactive online classes become a standard format and Outschool
become every kid's second school.


What advice can you give to new graduates who are entrepreneurial? 

There is a lot of advice online on building businesses and some of it is quite
good. If you think you want to try a startup, as opposed to building a different
kind of business, read Paul Graham's essays starting with Startup = Growth, and
watch the videos in Y Combinator's Startup School series.


My own startup tips are:
 * Start soon. Startups are hard and need a huge amount of energy and
   inspiration to be successful. You have the most energy when you're young and
   it takes a long time to build a significant company from scratch.

 * Keep your personal expenses low. If you become addicted to a high salary it
   will become increasingly difficult to start a company. Many people take
   high-paying jobs thinking they'll save up to do a startup later, but by the
   time they feel they have enough savings, they've become too comfortable with
   an expensive lifestyle.

 * Network with the right people. To build something people want, you need to
   meet potential customers - people who have urgent problems that need solving
   and money to spend on them. And building a company is easier when you have
   relationships with creative, energetic people who could help you as
   co-founders or partners. 

 * Be original. You don't necessarily need to have a new idea in order to make
   money in business. But if you go after an audacious goal in an original way,
   more people will be inspired to help you. And if you're going to put all that
   effort in why not aim to do something new that you can be proud of?



Upvote Upvoted 7


9 responses   //   Posted 7 years ago


OUTSCHOOLING IN THE BAY AREA

Homeschooling is interesting because, if some new approach is going to disrupt
the current education system and change it radically for the better, it seems
likely it would come from outside the system.

By necessity, parents who homeschool must try new approaches in order to find
something that works for their child. With 1.77M homeschooled students in the US
- 3.4% of the school-aged population -  this is the community where
experimentation / iteration amongst educational approaches is happening the
fastest. As a result the future of education is likely to come out of this
community.

Yet it is an overlooked community. For various reasons, the mainstream regard
homeschooling as a niche approach suitable only for the weird or the wealthy.
That’s a prejudice that doesn’t reflect the reality of the growing movement I've
observed in the Bay Area.


What I found


I first became interested in homeschooling several years ago after a friend with
six kids began homeschooling in San Francisco out of necessity - the public
school system wanted to send each of her kids to a different school. Instead of
hiring six Ubers each morning she decided to start homeschooling her kids
herself.


What she told me about the experience was very different, and much better, than
what I expected:
 1. It only takes 2-3 hours of study per day to keep up with the regular school
    curriculum since the kids were able to study when they were best prepared
    and motivated. No time was spent on bureaucracy / classroom management.
 2. The kids could deep dive into their own interests, thus learning
    self-direction and creativity without the requirement to stick to a fixed
    schedule and curriculum largely driven by logistical concerns
 3. A lot of basic material could be covered through online courses, such as
    those offered by Khan Academy
 4. A lot of learning occurs outside the home and is social

The last point was the biggest surprise to me. Especially in the Bay Area, there
is a wealth of group learning activities that are offered outside of
regular school. The Exploratorium, Academy of Sciences and Museum of Craft and
Design, to name but a few, offer tours and classes. New microschool
startups, such as QuantumCamp which offers one-day per week science programs,
are popping up. Parents group together to informally organize their own classes.


For example, one parent organized “Thinkering Day,” where one day per week for
12 weeks, up to 12 kids run through a program of literature, debate and art. The
day starts with actors from the SF Shakespeare Festival helping the kids explore
literature and drama together - Shakespeare intended his works to be performed,
not read and dryly studied out of a textbook. After lunch a parent facilitates a
classical debate class. Finally the kids explore art using iPads in a session
run by teachers from a startup that specializes in teaching mobile art.







All the activities happen in the beautiful setting of a mid-peninsula park. I
observed part of a session and the whole thing seemed like an idealized scene of
childhood out of a movie. The parent put together the curriculum because it was
something she wanted for her own kids, but she wouldn’t have wanted to hire the
tutors just for her own family. As well as that being much more expensive than
sharing the costs with other parents, it would have been a worse learning
experience for not being a group.

Seeing this, I connected with more parents and interviewed them to find out
more. A common vision of homeschooling is of kids studying alone at home and
being shielded from outside influences. But that vision doesn’t fit with what I
found through those interviews. All the families I spoke with had found or
helped create rich group learning experiences outside of regular school and
outside of the home. More like "out-of-schooling” than homeschooling. So I
started calling it Outschooling for short.

As well as exploring how families Outschooled, I asked what pushed them to try
it in the first place.

Why do parents choose to homeschool / outschool?


My interviews with homeschooling parents in the Bay Area uncovered the following
three reasons:


     1. Normal schools can’t personalize the curriculum and so deal poorly with
asynchronous learners.


Asynchronous learners are students who are gifted, but may develop at different
rates in different areas. The balance may well change over time since interests
/ neurology changes as they grow. That sounds like all of us to an extent. It
seems unlikely that most of us can progress at a range of subjects at exactly
the same speed, and moreover the same speed as the curriculum is written for.


     2. Learning should be more child-led and less test-driven. Schools kill
creativity.


Unschooling is an educational philosophy that roughly says children should learn
by living in and interacting with the world normally rather than being contained
within an artificial and prescriptive environment like school. The idea is to
create self-directed, life-long learners. 


Not many parents take this to the extreme of zero learning structure, but all
the parents I spoke with held this view to an extent and wanted their kids to
have a less structured learning environment.


     3. Kids with special needs are poorly catered for in regular school.


Dyslexia and other learning differences, especially when combined with the child
being very gifted in other ways (“twice exceptional”) make normal school an even
worse fit. Large class sizes and static curriculums prevent the personalization
that would be needed to give a great education for the individual. If you’re
very different from other kids, not only will you suffer academically, but the
social environment is also likely to be pretty terrible.


Looking at those three reasons, none seem too controversial. I think the first
two would resonate with most parents. And yet homeschooling / outschooling isn’t
mainstream. This is because most people have an out-dated view of what
learning outside of regular school can be, and because of the practical
difficulties of opting out of the current system. It was a full-time job for all
the parents I spoke with.


If the outschooling alternative was better understood, and more infrastructure
was in place to alleviate the practical difficulties, I think many more parents
would opt out of the regular school system.


Outschooling and Future Education


Sending your kids to school today involves them attending the same institution
each day in one physical location, working through a curriculum and standardized
tests that are planned centrally, and years in advance. This is industrialized,
mass-produced education that reflects the era in which the system was created.
The curriculum aims to standardize quality, and dealing with one institution is
logistically simple (relatively) for the parent who has somewhere to drop their
kids off while they go to work.


But the world of the future will value individual creativity,
differentiation and directly observable skills more than standardized knowledge
and credentials. The future education system will have to deliver “mass
customization”, and I believe this will be delivered by an ecosystem of many
different institutions - much more like the outschooling I discovered
interviewing parents.


Learning experiences will come in several different types:
 * In-person group activities
    * Teacher-led classes, similar to standard school classes
    * Social, interactive, broadening learning experiences e.g. park days,
      museum and company tours, craft workshops

 * Self-study 
    * Consuming content such as Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs)
    * Self-directed research and experimentation

 * Online group classes in real-time, allowing for student interaction and
   teacher-led learning

We can expect MOOCs and online group classes to play a much larger role in the
future, displacing some in-person group learning. These elements may even take
up half a student's learning time, especially for older students, if the
experiences of the homeschooling early-adopters are anything to go by. There are
already many EdTech startups building technology and services to support this
trend.


There are also startups looking to transform in-person learning through
incorporating technology into the classroom. But I think the big opportunity is
to look for ways to use technology to transform the existing school system,
rather than just sell technology into it. We know that improved communications
technology allows us to handle complex, real-time, physical world logistics
(Instacart, Lyft) in a way that we couldn’t before. Online marketplaces have
reduced transaction friction, increased liquidity and enable efficiency through
the use of spare capacity (AirBnB, FlightCar). We can apply these capabilities
to in-person group learning.


In the future I believe that we will see the school system unbundled as a
marketplace of classes. 


Imagine an “Airbnb for learning activities” where parents and kids assemble
custom curriculums from a mixture of institutions and individual teachers, both
professional and amateur. They collaborate to crowd-fund and crowd-source
activities together. Tutors may play a role, but the aim is not to create a
marketplace for 1:1 tutoring - small group activities are better value and
better learning experiences. Public schools would still provide classes for free
in this system, but would offer them course-by-course instead of bundled.


Why now and what next?


The parents of young kids now have grown up with the internet. They have seen
first-hand how fast the world has changed and how following the standard path is
no longer a sure thing. They know that to be successful, their kids will need to
be lifelong learners able to respond to change fast, and will need to cultivate
differentiated skills. The current school system isn’t keeping pace with the new
requirements and capabilities.


As a result, more will choose to opt-out of regular school and start
outschooling. To accelerate this trend, new services are going to be required
for:
 * Logisitics: such as transport, family calendars. How will parents and
   students plan their week, how will they coordinate between multiple
   institutions and how will kids be able to move between physical locations if
   they're not always in the same place?
 * Content: normal schools will eventually start offering unbundled courses, but
   in the short-term it's likely to be school startups, independent
   professionals teachers and parent / grad student amateurs who provide the
   activities.
 * Discovery: how will people find the activities or be recommended them, how
   will they be able to assess quality / suitability, how will enrollment work?

You can already see this starting to happen: Shuddle is a startup that is like
Uber specifically for moving kids around between activities. QuantumCamp is a
startup school offering a one-day per week science curriculum and you could
imagine it become a national subject-specific brand.

Discovery is big missing piece though. There needs to be a marketplace for
learning activities outside of regular school with great search, subscription
for updates by subject, location etc., consistent enrollment and tools for
organizers. I have started to work on this and am calling the project Outschool.

Agree with me and want to contribute? Get in touch!
Upvote Upvoted 23


32 responses   //   Posted 9 years ago


MENTAL MODEL FOR PRODUCT MANAGEMENT: A WAY TO CLASSIFY FEATURES

How do you decide what features you should build next?

A lot of startup and product management advice says that you should decide this
by being obsessively focused on listening to your customers’ needs. But at the
same time you shouldn’t listen to what they say literally. So how do you
interpret what they say?


Here is a mental model I use for classifying features that helps me with that
interpretation.


[Thanks to James Brady, Justin McKay and Kirsty Nathoo for reviewing. ]


Hygiene 


Hygiene features make people dissatisfied with your product if you don’t have
them. But will never make people love it, or even necessarily use it, no matter
how many of them you build and however well you build them.








[Thanks to James Brady for ideas for examples.]


A repeating schedule feature in a calendar app would be a hygiene feature.
Customers won’t appreciate your calendar because of its repeat option, no matter
how well it works, but if you don’t have it you can expect a lot of complaints.


And that’s the great thing about these features: people will tell you about your
product’s obvious deficiencies as they use it. They’ll come in through support
tickets, your sales team, social media and user forums. If your product is
targeting an existing market, you can also just look down the incumbents'
feature-lists. So it’s easy to find these kind of features and justify spending
time on them.


They may not be obvious from user-testing of prototypes alone though - people
may not think to look for a repeat option when examining mockups of a calendar
since they’re not using it for real and don’t have the same concerns as if they
were actually using it for work.


If you only build this kind of feature, at best your product will be the same as
all the others. 


Performance


The more performance features you have the more customers will like your
product, up to a point. These “features" are often actually considerations like
speed and simplicity that cut across other features.







The fewer steps it takes to deploy a new instance, the better people will like
your PaaS product. The higher the camera and screen resolution is on smart
phones, the better people seem to like them. Up to a point.





But it has a 100 gigapixel camera


Performance features often start life as differentiators. Someone makes a
technical break-through that makes something possible that wasn’t before “Hey,
we can now put a good-enough digital camera into a phone. That means people can
do more with fewer devices!” An industry forms around the breakthrough, and
companies compete by providing more and more of the same in each generation of
the product. And they become really, really good at doing that - and sometimes
not much else - which opens them up to disruption over time.


You can find these features by asking customers what they value when choosing a
product in your area. And they’ll be prominently referenced on competitor’s
homepages along with comparative or superlative adjectives.


Differentiators


Differentiators make your product dramatically better for a group of customers
in ways that are difficult to replicate or non-obvious. And yet, when they’re
not present, customers won’t notice the lack or tell you about them directly.







It isn’t obvious that making the photos ephemeral would be a good feature of a
photo messaging app. But Snapchat has shown that feature dramatically lowers the
bar for social sharing amongst teenagers.


Offering software over the internet, so customers don’t need to install it, and
charging a subscription rather than up-front license, so customers only pay for
what they use is clearly a better model for a lot of enterprise applications.
Incumbent enterprise software companies find it incredibly hard to replicate
because of their cost structure based on traditional sales - they’ve mostly had
to rely on acquisitions to compete at all.


Discovering these features is hard, and this is where product management becomes
creative. Famously, customers can't help you here.



     “If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster
horses.” - Henry Ford


So how you do discover these features? I try to think about applying learnings
from one context to a different one. I try to let curiosity guide me and to
purposefully explore very different ideas even if they seem crazy, or not
useful, or like toys. I try to train myself to have brain that can go
anywhere and to not shy away from difficult ideas.


Ultimately the only way you’ll know that you’ve correctly identified a
differentiating feature is by building it and seeing if people want it. 


Thanks for reading


This is just one lens through which to view the features of your product. As
with any tool you choose to use, be wary of this one’s limitations!
Upvote Upvoted 10


12 responses   //   Posted 10 years ago


AMIR NATHOO

Outschool
Square Payroll
Trigger.io
My LinkedIn

Browse the Archive »
Subscribe by email » We'll email you when there are new posts here.
You're following this blog. Unfollow »
Follow this Posthaven »
Enter your email address to get email alerts about new posts on this site.
Unsubscribe anytime.
Email address is invalid.


 * SITES I LIKE
   
    * Adam Nash
    * Paul Graham
    * Overcoming Bias
    * Less Wrong