30d.92f.myftpupload.com Open in urlscan Pro
184.168.47.225  Public Scan

Form analysis
0 forms found in the DOM

Text Content

MENU
 * Home
 * Media
   * Articles
   * Interviews
 * Documents
   * Fyk vs. Facebook I
     * 1. Northern District of California: Fyk Complaint
     * 2. Northern District of California: Facebook’s Motion to Dismiss
     * 3. Northern District of California: Fyk’s response in opposition to MTD
     * 4. Northern District of California: Facebook’s Response in support of MTD
     * 5. Northern District of California: Dismissal Order
     * 6. 9th Circuit: Opening Brief
     * 7. 9th Circuit: Answering Brief
     * 8. 9th Circuit: Fyk’s response in opposition to MTD
     * 9. 9th Circuit: Facebook’s Response in support of MTD
     * 10. 9th Circuit: Dismissal Order
     * 11. United States Supreme Court: Petition for Writ of Certiorari
   * Fyk Vs. Facebook II
     * 12. Northern District of California: Motion 60(b)
     * 13. Northern District of California: Facebook’s response in opposition to
       Motion 60(b)
     * 14. Northern District of California: Fyk’s response in support to Motion
       60(b)
     * 15. Northern District of CA Denying Relief
     * 16. 9th Circuit Fyk 60(b) Opening Brief (incorrect)
     * 17. 9th Circuit 60(b) opening brief (corrected)
     * 18. 9th Circuit Facebook 60(b) Answering Brief
     * 19. 9th Circuit Fyk 60(b) Reply Brief
     * 20. 9th Circuit Denial – Timeliness
     * 21. 9th Circuit Fyk Motion for Reconsideration
     * 22. Fyk 60(b) Supp Filing Lemmon vs Snap Inc
     * 23. 5th Cir Jarkesy vs SEC Supp Notice
     * 24. 4th Cir. Henderson Supp Authority Filing
     * 25. Ted Cruz Amicus Gonzalez
     * 26. Reading Section 230 as Written Highlighted
     * 27. Fyk v Facebook 2023 SCOTUS Petition
     * 28. Fyk v Facebook 2023 SCOTUS Petition Appendix
   * CDA explained
   * Justice Thomas
     * (Enigma vs. Malwarebytes)
     * (Doe vs. Facebook)
   * Fyk Vs. United States of America
     * 1. Fyk vs United States Constitutional Challenge
     * 2. Fyk vs. United States USAG Motion to Dismiss
     * 3. Fyk vs. United States Oposition to Motion to Dismiss
     * 4. Fyk vs United States USAG Response in Support of MTD
   * Online Freedom Act
   * Override Forum Selection Act
   * Maxims
     * General Maxims
     * Supreme Court Maxims
 * About
   * Members
   * Submit Your Story
   * Events
 * Donate
 * Contact
   * Media Inquiries



Email info@socialmediafreedom.org
 * Home
 * Media
   * Articles
   * Interviews
 * Documents
   * Fyk vs. Facebook I
     * 1. Northern District of California: Fyk Complaint
     * 2. Northern District of California: Facebook’s Motion to Dismiss
     * 3. Northern District of California: Fyk’s response in opposition to MTD
     * 4. Northern District of California: Facebook’s Response in support of MTD
     * 5. Northern District of California: Dismissal Order
     * 6. 9th Circuit: Opening Brief
     * 7. 9th Circuit: Answering Brief
     * 8. 9th Circuit: Fyk’s response in opposition to MTD
     * 9. 9th Circuit: Facebook’s Response in support of MTD
     * 10. 9th Circuit: Dismissal Order
     * 11. United States Supreme Court: Petition for Writ of Certiorari
   * Fyk Vs. Facebook II
     * 12. Northern District of California: Motion 60(b)
     * 13. Northern District of California: Facebook’s response in opposition to
       Motion 60(b)
     * 14. Northern District of California: Fyk’s response in support to Motion
       60(b)
     * 15. Northern District of CA Denying Relief
     * 16. 9th Circuit Fyk 60(b) Opening Brief (incorrect)
     * 17. 9th Circuit 60(b) opening brief (corrected)
     * 18. 9th Circuit Facebook 60(b) Answering Brief
     * 19. 9th Circuit Fyk 60(b) Reply Brief
     * 20. 9th Circuit Denial – Timeliness
     * 21. 9th Circuit Fyk Motion for Reconsideration
     * 22. Fyk 60(b) Supp Filing Lemmon vs Snap Inc
     * 23. 5th Cir Jarkesy vs SEC Supp Notice
     * 24. 4th Cir. Henderson Supp Authority Filing
     * 25. Ted Cruz Amicus Gonzalez
     * 26. Reading Section 230 as Written Highlighted
     * 27. Fyk v Facebook 2023 SCOTUS Petition
     * 28. Fyk v Facebook 2023 SCOTUS Petition Appendix
   * CDA explained
   * Justice Thomas
     * (Enigma vs. Malwarebytes)
     * (Doe vs. Facebook)
   * Fyk Vs. United States of America
     * 1. Fyk vs United States Constitutional Challenge
     * 2. Fyk vs. United States USAG Motion to Dismiss
     * 3. Fyk vs. United States Oposition to Motion to Dismiss
     * 4. Fyk vs United States USAG Response in Support of MTD
   * Online Freedom Act
   * Override Forum Selection Act
   * Maxims
     * General Maxims
     * Supreme Court Maxims
 * About
   * Members
   * Submit Your Story
   * Events
 * Donate
 * Contact
   * Media Inquiries


donate now
Slide 1
INTERNET EQUALITY SUMMIT
May 11th - May 13th.

The Section 230 event of the year. Featuring Keynote Speakers such as Dennis
Prager, Jason Fyk and many more!

PURCHASE TICKETS NOW
Slide 2
FREE SPEECH ON SOCIAL MEDIA

We cannot sit while Big Tech oligarchs unlawfully and unconstitutionally deny
our liberties.

DONATE TODAY
Slide 3
RESTORE FREEDOM ONLINE

With your support, We The People, can advocate to repeal Section 230 - and
restore our 1st Amendment Rights online.

READ EXECTUIVE SUMMARY







WE MUST FIGHT FOR FREEDOM ONLINE OR WE RISK LOSING OUR LIBERTIES

In 1996, Congress passed the Communications Decency Act (CDA) to help rid the
internet of filth and protect our children from harmful content. In section 230,
Congress sought to protect interactive computer service providers when acting as
a “Good Samaritan”, voluntarily restricting offensive materials online. However,
that is not what has transpired. Although section 230 was well-intentioned,
section 230 now presents one of the greatest threats to our American way of
life. Unbeknownst to many, section 230 grants private businesses the legislative
authority, to create and enforce any self-imposed regulatory code it deems to be
“in the public interest”.

 

In Mistretta v. United States, Justice Scalia once warned us; “This standard
(‘public interest’) has effectively allowed Congress to grant administrative
agencies (here, private businesses) the authority to create any rules they deem
to be in the public interest, solely relying on the agency’s own views and
policy agenda rather than requiring Congress to set forth objective guidelines.”
Without objective guidelines or oversight, Congress has effectively granted
private businesses the unfettered authority to regulate, not only the American
people but the government itself. Simply stated, Congress’ delegation of section
230 authority is unconstitutional because it confers power, not to an official
body, “but to private persons whose interests may be and often are adverse to
the interests of others in the same business.”

 

The Fifth Amendment says to the federal government that no one shall be
“deprived of life, liberty or property — without due process of law” and the
internet is no exception! Section 230’s civil liability protection to restrict
citizens materials (property) or their ability to do as they please (liberty),
based on the private businesses’ own self-interests and agenda, ultimately
denies Americans their Due Process Right and we must do something to stop this
immediately or risk losing our Liberty forever.

Recent Updates

March 14, 2023


BIG TECH CENSORSHIP & THE WAR ON FREE SPEECH

Alec Flores 0
https://twitter.com/JasonFyk/status/1635776425239232513?s=20
January 24, 2023


BIG TECH VS FREEDOM OF SPEECH – SECTION 230 BATTLE WITH JASON FYK – EP.116

Alec Flores 0
https://rumble.com/embed/v24actu/?pub=4
January 13, 2023


JASON FYK UNVEILS STRATEGY TO FORCE THE GOVERNMENT TO END SEC. 230 CENSORSHIP

Alec Flores 0
Watch the Full Video on Brighteon
January 6, 2023


EP 162 | THE GOVERNMENT AGENCY – INTELLIGENCE ORGANIZATION – BIG TECH LEVIATHAN
IS LIABLE

Alec Flores 0
Watch the Full Video Here


TEXAS CONGRESSMEN LOUIE GOHMERT DISCUSSING SECTION 230





IN-DEPTH ARTICLES EXPLAINING SECTION 230 

November 18, 2022


FEDERAL COURT DETERMINES SECTION 230 ‘IS NOT LICENSE TO DO WHATEVER ONE WANTS
ONLINE’

Alec Flores 0
https://thefederalist.com/2022/11/18/federal-court-determines-section-230-is-not-license-to-do-whatever-one-wants-online/
October 12, 2022


JASON FYK: PUBLISHER VS PLATFORM– SECTION 230’S ‘AS APPLIED’ PROBLEM

Alec Flores 0
https://humanevents.com/2022/10/12/jason-fyk-publisher-vs-platform-section-230s-as-applied-problem
September 9, 2022


PRIVATE OR STATE ACTION? – SECTION 230’S ACHILLES’ HEEL

Alec Flores 0
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/private-state-action-section-230s-achilles-heel/


Members


JASON FYK

Founder & Director View Profile


DAVID HARRIS JR.

Director View Profile


ANN VANDERSTEEL

Director View Profile


BRENT HAMMACHEK

Director View Profile


JACKIE JONES

Media Liason View Profile


LAURA SEXTRO

Strategic Avisory Liason View Profile


RYAN HARTWIG

Officer View Profile


IAN TROTTIER

Officer View Profile


ANGIE WONG

Officer View Profile


ALEC T. FLORES

Website Director View Profile


Strategic Partners




Leaders Say

"This standard has effectively allowed Congress to grant administrative agencies
the authority to create any rules they deem to be in the public interest, solely
relying on the agency's own views and policy agenda."



JUSTICE ANTONIN SCALIA

Former associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States
"This modest understanding [Section 230] is a far cry from what has prevailed in
court. Adopting the too-common practice of reading extra immunity into statues
where it does not belong."



JUSTICE CLARENCE THOMAS

Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States
"Unless [Section 230] imposes some good faith limitation on what a blocking
software provider can consider 'otherwise objectionable,' or some requirement
that blocking be consistent with user choice, immunity might stretch to cover
conduct .



JUDGE RAYMOND C. FISHER

Senior Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
“Withholding information is the essence of tyranny. Control of the flow of
information is the tool of the dictatorship.”



BRUCE COVILLE

Novelist
“If all printers were determined not to print anything till they were sure it
would offend nobody, there would be very little printed.”



BENJAMIN FRANKLIN


“What is freedom of expression? Without the freedom to offend, it ceases to
exist.”



SALMAN RUSHDIE

Writer, Professor





SIGN UP FOR SMFF NEWSLETTER

Together, our voices cannot be ignored by those who try to silence us.



“Freedom of expression does not end where the internet begins.”
– Social Media Freedom Foundation 

 * Home
 * Media
   * Articles
   * Interviews
 * Documents
   * Fyk vs. Facebook I
     * 1. Northern District of California: Fyk Complaint
     * 2. Northern District of California: Facebook’s Motion to Dismiss
     * 3. Northern District of California: Fyk’s response in opposition to MTD
     * 4. Northern District of California: Facebook’s Response in support of MTD
     * 5. Northern District of California: Dismissal Order
     * 6. 9th Circuit: Opening Brief
     * 7. 9th Circuit: Answering Brief
     * 8. 9th Circuit: Fyk’s response in opposition to MTD
     * 9. 9th Circuit: Facebook’s Response in support of MTD
     * 10. 9th Circuit: Dismissal Order
     * 11. United States Supreme Court: Petition for Writ of Certiorari
   * Fyk Vs. Facebook II
     * 12. Northern District of California: Motion 60(b)
     * 13. Northern District of California: Facebook’s response in opposition to
       Motion 60(b)
     * 14. Northern District of California: Fyk’s response in support to Motion
       60(b)
     * 15. Northern District of CA Denying Relief
     * 16. 9th Circuit Fyk 60(b) Opening Brief (incorrect)
     * 17. 9th Circuit 60(b) opening brief (corrected)
     * 18. 9th Circuit Facebook 60(b) Answering Brief
     * 19. 9th Circuit Fyk 60(b) Reply Brief
     * 20. 9th Circuit Denial – Timeliness
     * 21. 9th Circuit Fyk Motion for Reconsideration
     * 22. Fyk 60(b) Supp Filing Lemmon vs Snap Inc
     * 23. 5th Cir Jarkesy vs SEC Supp Notice
     * 24. 4th Cir. Henderson Supp Authority Filing
     * 25. Ted Cruz Amicus Gonzalez
     * 26. Reading Section 230 as Written Highlighted
     * 27. Fyk v Facebook 2023 SCOTUS Petition
     * 28. Fyk v Facebook 2023 SCOTUS Petition Appendix
   * CDA explained
   * Justice Thomas
     * (Enigma vs. Malwarebytes)
     * (Doe vs. Facebook)
   * Fyk Vs. United States of America
     * 1. Fyk vs United States Constitutional Challenge
     * 2. Fyk vs. United States USAG Motion to Dismiss
     * 3. Fyk vs. United States Oposition to Motion to Dismiss
     * 4. Fyk vs United States USAG Response in Support of MTD
   * Online Freedom Act
   * Override Forum Selection Act
   * Maxims
     * General Maxims
     * Supreme Court Maxims
 * About
   * Members
   * Submit Your Story
   * Events
 * Donate
 * Contact
   * Media Inquiries



Social Media Freedom Foundation Corp. Is a 501c3 Non Profit | Est. 2021