www.washingtonpost.com
Open in
urlscan Pro
23.37.45.67
Public Scan
URL:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2024/09/24/prince-harry-heritage-foundation-visa/?utm_campaign=wp_post_most&utm_medium=em...
Submission: On September 24 via api from BE — Scanned from DE
Submission: On September 24 via api from BE — Scanned from DE
Form analysis 1 forms found in the DOM
<form class="wpds-c-gRPFSl wpds-c-gRPFSl-jGNYrR-isSlim-false">
<div class="transition-all duration-200 ease-in-out"><button type="submit" data-qa="sc-newsletter-signup-button" class="wpds-c-kSOqLF wpds-c-kSOqLF-uTUwn-variant-primary wpds-c-kSOqLF-eHdizY-density-default wpds-c-kSOqLF-ejCoEP-icon-left">Sign
up</button></div>
</form>Text Content
Accessibility statementSkip to main content Democracy Dies in Darkness SubscribeSign in Advertisement Democracy Dies in Darkness nationalClimateEducationHealthInnovationsInvestigationsNational SecurityObituariesScience nationalClimateEducationHealthInnovationsInvestigationsNational SecurityObituariesScience JUDGE REJECTS HERITAGE FOUNDATION BID TO RELEASE PRINCE HARRY VISA RECORDS The conservative think tank argued the public had an interest in how the Department of Homeland Security handled Harry’s application given his past drug use. 4 min 408 Prince Harry in New York City on Monday, the day the judge's ruling was made public. (Bing Guan/Reuters) By Annabelle Timsit Updated September 24, 2024 at 11:08 a.m. EDT|Published September 24, 2024 at 7:41 a.m. EDT A U.S. judge has denied a petition by the Heritage Foundation to release Prince Harry’s immigration records, ruling that the British royal’s right to privacy outweighs the public-interest arguments cited by the conservative think tank. Subscribe for unlimited access to The Post You can cancel anytime. Subscribe The Heritage Foundation and one of its employees, Mike Howell, sued the Department of Homeland Security last year after the agency denied the group’s request to release information relating to any disclosures Harry may have made about his past drug use when securing entry into the United States. The request came shortly after the release of Harry’s memoir, “Spare,” in which the Duke of Sussex revealed that he had used cocaine, cannabis and psychedelic mushrooms. D.C. District Judge Carl J. Nichols, who was appointed by President Donald Trump in 2019, denied the Heritage Foundation’s request in a filing published Monday. Advertisement Story continues below advertisement Nichols said Harry has a “legitimate privacy interest in his immigration status” and ruled that “the public does not have a strong interest in disclosure” of his personal records. 🌎 Follow World news Follow Harry and his wife, Meghan, moved to California in 2020 after stepping back from royal duties. It is not clear what visa Harry obtained before entering the United States. Meghan is a U.S. citizen. “Americans deserve an immigration system with both secure borders and also fairly applied rules for high-profile immigrants like Harry,” said Howell, the plaintiff in the case, in a statement. He said he was considering appealing the judge’s ruling. Representatives for Harry did not immediately respond to a request for comment Tuesday. Story continues below advertisement U.S. immigration authorities can deny entry for foreign nationals over past drug use, though they don’t always do so. According to the U.S. Embassy in the United Kingdom, travelers who “are a drug abuser or addict may be ineligible to receive a visa. If found ineligible, they will require a waiver of ineligibility in order to travel.” Advertisement Certain immigration statuses do not require such disclosures: For example, the A-1 head of state visa has “a lower security and background check threshold,” and an eligible applicant would be declared inadmissible only on “terrorism and national security” grounds, according to the London-based Chavin Immigration Law Office. In denying the Heritage Foundation’s disclosure request under the Freedom of Information Act, DHS refused to confirm or deny whether it had certain immigration records associated with Harry, including any waiver of ineligibility under the Immigration and Nationality Act. According to the judge’s ruling, the government argued that “disclosing the existence (or not) of such records would disclose something not presently public about the Duke’s immigration information.” Story continues below advertisement The Heritage Foundation had argued that Harry’s records could reveal “whether DHS committed misconduct or acted negligently in either admitting the Duke of Sussex or in allowing him to stay within the United States” in light of his disclosure that he used drugs in various countries. Advertisement In “Spare,” Harry wrote that he used cocaine several times and said “it didn’t make me particularly happy.” He also wrote about smoking “an entire shopping bag of weed” in one evening and about experimenting with psychedelics “over the years, for fun,” and later “therapeutically, medicinally,” to treat anxiety. In his ruling — which is partially redacted because it contains information about Harry’s immigration records — Nichols acknowledged that the prince’s public statements about his past drug use “tend to diminish his privacy interests compared to ordinary foreign nationals admitted to the United States.” Story continues below advertisement But, he said, “like any foreign national, the duke has a legitimate privacy interest in his immigration status.” The judge also said that obtaining records relating to one person’s individual circumstance would not give the public enough insight into DHS policy on travelers’ records of drug use. “Public disclosure of records about a single admission of a foreign national … would provide the public, at best, limited information about the Department’s general policy in admitting aliens,” he said in his ruling. Harry has said he has considered becoming an American citizen and listed himself as a U.S. resident in recent business filings. Karla Adam contributed to this report. Share 408 Comments NewsletterAs news breaks Exclusive Alerts Breaking news email alerts and investigative journalism you'll only find in The Post. Sign up Subscribe to comment and get the full experience. Choose your plan → Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement Company About The Post Newsroom Policies & Standards Diversity & Inclusion Careers Media & Community Relations WP Creative Group Accessibility Statement Sitemap Get The Post Become a Subscriber Gift Subscriptions Mobile & Apps Newsletters & Alerts Washington Post Live Reprints & Permissions Post Store Books & E-Books Today’s Paper Public Notices Contact Us Contact the Newsroom Contact Customer Care Contact the Opinions Team Advertise Licensing & Syndication Request a Correction Send a News Tip Report a Vulnerability Terms of Use Digital Products Terms of Sale Print Products Terms of Sale Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Settings Submissions & Discussion Policy RSS Terms of Service Ad Choices washingtonpost.com © 1996-2024 The Washington Post * washingtonpost.com * © 1996-2024 The Washington Post * About The Post * Contact the Newsroom * Contact Customer Care * Request a Correction * Send a News Tip * Report a Vulnerability * Download the Washington Post App * Policies & Standards * Terms of Service * Privacy Policy * Cookie Settings * Print Products Terms of Sale * Digital Products Terms of Sale * Submissions & Discussion Policy * Sitemap * RSS Terms of Service * Ad Choices COOKIE CHOICES FOR EU, SWISS & UK RESIDENTS We and our 94 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting "I Accept" enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under "we and our partners process data to provide," whereas selecting "Reject All" or withdrawing your consent will disable them. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the ["privacy preferences"] link on the bottom of the webpage [or the floating icon on the bottom-left of the webpage, if applicable]. Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy. If you click “I accept,” in addition to processing data using cookies and similar technologies for the purposes to the right, you also agree we may process the profile information you provide and your interactions with our surveys and other interactive content for personalized advertising. If you are an EU, Swiss, or UK resident and you do not accept, we will process cookies and associated data for strictly necessary purposes and process non-cookie data as set forth in our Privacy Policy (consistent with law and, if applicable, other choices you have made). WE AND OUR PARTNERS PROCESS COOKIE DATA TO PROVIDE: Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Create profiles for personalised advertising. Use profiles to select personalised advertising. Create profiles to personalise content. Use profiles to select personalised content. Measure advertising performance. Measure content performance. Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources. Develop and improve services. Store and/or access information on a device. Use limited data to select content. Use limited data to select advertising. List of Partners (vendors) I Accept Reject All Show Purposes