digitalfacilitation.net Open in urlscan Pro
64.90.50.8 Public Scan

Back to summary

Submitted URL:
http://digitalfacilitation.net/
Effective URL:
https://digitalfacilitation.net/
Submission: On November 16 via api (November 16th 2024, 6:01:05 am UTC) from US — Scanned from CA

Form analysis
1 forms found in the DOM

GET https://digitalfacilitation.net/

<form role="search" method="get" id="searchform" class="searchform" action="https://digitalfacilitation.net/">
  <div>
    <label class="screen-reader-text" for="s">Search for:</label>
    <input type="text" value="" name="s" id="s">
    <input type="submit" id="searchsubmit" value="Search">
  </div>
</form>

Text Content

DIGITAL VISUAL FACILITATION

tools, tips, and tech for virtual work and remote collaboration
Skip to content
* Home
* My Services
* The Virtual Workspace Architect’s Guide

← Older posts

HOW I DEAL WITH FRUSTRATION AT WORK

Posted on September 18, 2022 by Rachel | Leave a comment

We all have days when we just don’t like our jobs – when a bunch of annoyances
seem to pile up at once, and we start feeling like we can’t take it anymore.
When this happens to me, I imagine going to my manager and saying “I really
don’t like my job right now.” Then I imagine what he’d say to me. It’s probably
not what you’d think.

Photo by Elisa Ventur on Unsplash

My manager is a smart, supportive person who wants his people to grow. So I know
that what he’d say to me is, “Wow, that’s terrible. How can I help you fix
that?” What he’s asking here is not to listen to me rant or whine about what’s
bothering me. He’s asking for actionable ideas that are within my (or his)
control that will make the situation better. This is a totally reasonable and
useful thing for him to ask, but chances are I won’t be ready with a good
response in that moment. By the time I want to have this conversation, I’m so
annoyed or frustrated or upset that I’m not seeing solutions. I need to vent
before I can think clearly – but I don’t want to vent at him.

Instead, I work through my problems using a template that starts with a full-on
vent and ends with sane, actionable ideas to address the pain points I’m feeling
at work. It looks more or less like this:

Fixing My Job template by Rachel Smith

You can download a copy for yourself or your team here: Fixing My Job Template
(16742 downloads )

HOW IT WORKS

I start by filling in the first column on the left, all the way down. What’s
bugging me? This is where I get to vent it all out. I recommend printing the PDF
template and writing by hand in case you want to shred it later. Some of what I
write in this column should never see the light of day. Usually, I start to feel
better as soon as I’ve put it all down on paper.

In the second column, I get to dream. What would I prefer to have happen, if I
could have anything at all? It doesn’t matter whether I can bring it about – but
what would the situation look like if it were perfect?

The third column is for acknowledging real issues that stand between what’s I
feel now (first column) and what I envision (second column). Is it something I
don’t have (like a tool or resource) or something I don’t know (like a skill)?
Is it how another person behaves? Some of these blockers I will have control
over, and some I won’t. That’s OK.

I usually take a break after completing the first 3 columns. A few hours or even
a day later, I’ll come back and work on column 4. What can I personally do (or
ask my manager to personally do) to move closer to my ideal version of events in
column 2? This is the most difficult part, but it’s also where the gold is
buried in this exercise. It’s important to acknowledge what is and isn’t within
my power to control at this point, and to be honest about steps I could take
that I might not look forward to.

Note that I’m not committing to doing all these things. Some of them might be
difficult, and some are probably outside my comfort zone or I wouldn’t have the
problem in the first place. I might need coaching or support to do some of them.
But what I am doing is making a list that shows I have some control over the
frustrating parts of my job.

The final step is to underline or circle the actions I will actually do or ask
my manager to do. Then I can either start doing them or set up some time to
present my ask to him. Usually, there’s enough that I can do on my own that I
don’t even need to schedule time with my manager before getting started.

WHY IT WORKS

The impact of this framework is that it moves me from feeling frustrated,
powerless, and stuck to being an active agent for positive change in my own
life. Remember the change formula: C = DVF > R. CHANGE only happens when people
combine DISSATISFACTION with the current situation with a compelling VISION of
something better and clear FIRST STEPS toward action, thus overcoming RESISTANCE
to change. Lacking any of the DVF elements, there is no C. This framework links
the D, the V, and the F together very clearly, so I have a path to overcome my
own resistance to change.

If you’re a manager yourself, consider sharing this framework with your team. It
should help them clarify what they can do and what they may need from you to
ease the pain points of their own jobs.

Get your copy here: Fixing My Job Template (16742 downloads )

TELL A FRIEND:

* Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
* Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
* Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
* Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
* Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
*

LIKE THIS:

Like Loading...

Leave a comment

Posted in everything

Tagged change formula, howto, management, templates, tools

REVIEW: MILANOTE

Posted on June 21, 2020 by Rachel | 4 comments

I just tried Milanote for the first time and I have to say, I love it. Full
disclosure: Milanote contacted me and asked if I’d consider adding it to the
list of collaboration apps on one of my blog posts. They offered me a lifetime
pro account in exchange. I said I’d be happy to try it out and write an honest
review, which this is, but it’s only fair to tell you that they did upgrade my
trial account to pro at no cost (thanks, Milanote!). However, the review is
entirely mine and, as usual, I’m speaking my mind here.

My first mood board in Milanote

Milanote is… I don’t even know how to classify it, it’s so versatile. It can do
kanban boards like Trello, and mood boards faster and easier than how I usually
do them (uh… in Illustrator… when all you have is a hammer, after all), and
checklists and swatches and comments and… there’s a lot there. It has dozens of
templates to choose from, for design and software/agile and teaming and planning
and even writing. I picked the Mood Board template because I wanted to see how
it would work for planning a new quilt that I hope to make. You know, someday.

After adding a heading, a picture of the quilt, and a link to my selected
pattern (Refraction by Quilting JetGirl/Yvonne Fuchs), I headed over to Unsplash
to find mood pictures. I did a bunch of work downloading the pictures and
copying the credits into a file, as I usually do, and then I uploaded some of
them into Milanote. When I had used all the photo spaces that came with the
template, I clicked the “add image” button, and that’s when Milanote blew my
mind. It’s already linked up with Unsplash. I typed the same search terms in
Milanote, and then just clicked each Unsplash photo to add it, right there on my
board. Each one popped in beautifully with the photo credit already attached.

Adding a photo from Unsplash.com in Milanote

After that, I just started writing this review because I had to rave about it.
The interface is delightful. It’s pretty and elegant and intuitive, with just
enough snap-to help so that your board looks perfect, but not so much that you
spend a lot of time nudging stuff and swearing (I’m looking at you, MS Word).
The different cards (checklist, photo, swatch, comment, heading…) behave exactly
as I expected, except where they were even better than I expected. Software
companies always talk about delighting their customers. Milanote, I am
delighted.

I didn’t test the collaborative aspects, but there’s a tab to add collaborators
(editors) and it looks as easy as you’d expect. You can also add comment cards
and use @ mentions to your teammates to ask them questions. You can export the
board as a PDF or an image, or you can create a view-only link like this one.
Have a look. You can even look at a board on your phone and add a “quick note,”
which appears in a special column accessible from a menu icon.

The one drawback I found was the color picker. It’s a very simple one, and I
wanted an eyedropper so I could pick colors out of the photos on my board. (If
there is one, I didn’t find it.) I ended up flipping back and forth between
Milanote and a hex color picker in another tab, which was unsatisfying. I did
love being able to paste the hex color into the swatch template and have the
color fill the swatch, though.

Milanote’s color picker (there’s also a small swatch palette)

After about 45 minutes (including writing this review) I ended up with the board
pictured above. I’m left feeling like there is more to discover, in a good way,
and looking forward to creating more boards later on. I’m curious how it would
behave with multiple people working on a board at once — something to test
another time. For now, I definitely recommend giving it a try for any planning
or design project you’ve got coming up.

TELL A FRIEND:

LIKE THIS:

Like Loading...

4 Comments

Posted in everything

Tagged collaboration, reviews, tools

LOOKING FOR THE VIRTUAL WORKSPACE ARCHITECT’S GUIDE?

Posted on May 12, 2020 by Rachel | Leave a comment

Yesterday I released five previously unpublished chapters from a manuscript I
wrote while working at The Grove a few years ago. The mini-book, called The
Virtual Workspace Architect’s Guide, explains how to bring your team together to
create a virtual workspace that supports remote collaboration and covers the
whole process of figuring out what your team prefers and requires, establishing
which interactions aren’t being adequately supported, selecting a set of tools
that will work for you, and rolling them out with your team.

It’s free to download. If you want it again later, you can find it under the
permanent link at the top of the blog (“Virtual Workspace Architect’s Guide”)
for easy access.

The button highlighted in red links to the Guide’s permanent page.

It’s designed for anyone who suddenly finds themselves working remotely and
needing to engage in ongoing collaboration with a team or group. Full details
are provided on the page linked from the button.

Enjoy!

TELL A FRIEND:

LIKE THIS:

Like Loading...

Leave a comment

Posted in everything

Tagged collaboration, howto, remotecollaboration, resources

WHY IS REMOTE WORK SO HARD? AND HOW CAN WE MAKE IT EASIER?

Posted on April 5, 2020 by Rachel | Leave a comment

Over the years I’ve spoken to hundreds of people who have attempted some kind of
collaborative online work only to have it go sideways. It happens to me, too.
It’s pretty common, since tools for remote collaboration are not yet a
completely solved problem.[1]

What struck me in these conversations is the commonality of feeling that people
express when they tell me about the problems they’ve had. They’re understandably
frustrated, sure, but there’s also a sizable chunk of disappointment and
betrayal in the mix: My tools let me down, and I feel personally hurt.

Photo by Tim Gouw on Unsplash

It’s totally natural to feel this way. It comes about in part because we
unconsciously expect the technology to take away some of the burden of whatever
we’re doing, the way a word processor takes away some of the burden of typing
with spelling correction, easy undo, delete, and cut and paste. We expect that
the technology will bear some of the burden of designing, planning, running, and
facilitating the remote work we need to do. We certainly expect it to help
connect people who are located at a distance from each other. We expect the
work, therefore, to be easier. And then we try it, and it isn’t, and we feel let
down.

The truth is, in the world of remote collaboration, technology doesn’t make
anything easier. Technology just makes some things possible that aren’t
otherwise possible.

It’s not actually supposed to be easier; as I said, the tools aren’t there yet.
But based on experiences with older technologies that are solved problems, like
telephones and word processors and spreadsheets, we imagine it should be easier
to get people together online and have a meeting and get real work done, and we
feel disappointed and betrayed when it isn’t.

So how can we address this issue? During those conversations with disappointed
remote workers, I asked why the work felt so painful. Their responses resolved
into three major problems that came up again and again. The bad news is, these
problems make remote work a struggle. The good news is, they are fixable, though
not with a purely technical solution.

The three problems that make remote work so much harder boil down to these:

* The structure of the engagement doesn’t match the intended outcomes.
* The collaborative bandwidth we expect to be available to us, is reduced.
* People don’t feel co-present with one another, and instead feel disconnected.

Let’s look at how each one shows up and what you can do to fix it in your next
remote engagement.

PROBLEM 1: THE STRUCTURE OF THE ENGAGEMENT DOESN’T MATCH THE INTENDED OUTCOMES.

This causes frustration because people can’t do the work they have shown up to
do, which is very unsatisfying. The fix is straightforward and can be
implemented even before the engagement starts, although I am always ready to
pivot during an engagement if it turns out I goofed in my planning.

Now that’s a complex structure. Photo by Juliana Malta on Unsplash

When designing a remote engagement, carefully think through what you want to
accomplish in a given period of time, and how you can best use that time to get
to your outcomes. It takes more time and more thought than preparing for a
similar face-to-face meeting, but the work itself is not all that different.

These are the questions I ask myself to make sure the structure is going to
match the outcomes of my remote engagement:

1. What does this group need to accomplish before the engagement ends?
2. Are they also invested in those outcomes? If not, what do I need to do to
either realign the outcomes or increase people’s investment in them before
we start?
3. What is the highest and best use of our time together? The phrasing of this
question comes from my colleague Marsha Acker, CEO of TeamCatapult, and I
love how it helps me prioritize what should be done together and what can be
done asynchronously (or not at all).
4. When I imagine each participant sitting alone at their computer, what can I
offer that will help them accomplish the outcomes they are invested in?
Here, I’m thinking about activity design, tools, careful instructions,
smooth transitions, and tech support, but I’m also thinking about the
attitude or presence that I will bring to the group — calm and supportive.
5. How am I going to make sure no one gets lost when we switch from one tool or
context to another? What am I going to do when someone gets lost anyway?
6. How long can I expect them to focus on this engagement? Is that enough time
to accomplish all the outcomes? If not, what do I need to change about my
design?

There are two reasons this takes longer for a remote engagement than a
face-to-face one: most of us aren’t used to doing complex remote engagements, so
we have to think about it more than we would if it were a face-to-face
engagement; and the toolset is wider and requires more research than the
familiar in-room toolset. Both of those things do get easier with time and
practice.

PROBLEM 2: THE COLLABORATIVE BANDWIDTH WE EXPECT TO BE AVAILABLE TO US, IS
REDUCED.

We’re all aware that there are many rich communication channels available to us
when we are standing face-to-face with someone, especially if we’re in a
well-appointed meeting space with tools to support the work that needs to be
done. When we switch to an online setting, we are also acutely aware that many
of those channels have been stripped away; the most common one that people miss
is body language, but it’s not the only compromised channel. I call those
channels, and the capacity they have to enable communication, collaborative
bandwidth.

> Collaborative bandwidth is defined as the number of channels available to
> support collaborative group work and the capacity of those channels to enable
> communication in the service of that work. (p. 24)[2]

Imagine the amount of communication your group has to have in order to
accomplish its outcomes. Imagine all that communication moving through a wide
pipe, big enough with room to spare. No problem. Now imagine the pipe gets
smaller — a lot smaller. Like 80% smaller. Communication slows down, mushes
together, and becomes unclear and frustrating. That’s exactly what’s happening
in a remote engagement that doesn’t have enough collaborative bandwidth.

Plenty of room in this pipe. Photo by Eryk on Unsplash

The fix is simply to make the pipe bigger: add enough collaborative bandwidth to
accomplish what needs to get done. Audio is one channel, video is another,
sharing screens is a third, and using hands-on tools to co-create something is a
fourth (there are many others). If your design includes enough channels to
support the work you are doing, you can reduce this pain point or remove it
entirely. I usually use different channels throughout an engagement depending on
what we’re doing at the time. (See footnote #2 if you want to get geeky with
collaborative bandwidth.)

PROBLEM 3: PEOPLE DON’T FEEL CO-PRESENT WITH ONE ANOTHER, AND INSTEAD FEEL
DISCONNECTED.

Co-presence is the feeling of being somewhere together with someone. I learned
about it from Rachel Hatch, who was at the Institute for the Future at the time.
She was exploring technologies to support co-presence and the idea of replacing
telepresence, where you are present on video and audio, with co-presence, where
you are present in other ways as well. The concept has stuck with me and
influenced the way I plan my remote engagements ever since. I find that people
who feel co-present are more productive and effective at collaborative work than
people who don’t feel co-present.

To really bring this concept home, think about attending a webinar where you
have no idea who else is there, or even how many attendees there are. The audio
only supports the speaker or panelists; the only visuals you see are the ones
they choose to share. It feels like you are alone on one side of a one-way
mirror. During Q&A, you find out that some people you know are also attending,
but you have no opportunity to connect with them. This is the opposite of
co-presence. It might be a good way to deliver a lecture, but it’s a terrible
way to do collaborative work.

. . . Anyone else here? Photo by Jacob Le on Unsplash

Now think about a virtual coffee break with your best friend or a close family
member. It’s just the two of you, your video connection is working great, the
audio is clear, and you each have your favorite hot beverage in hand. You sip
and laugh and comfort each other about whatever you’re struggling with at the
moment. This is absolutely co-presence. Although it’s a social example, this is
the feeling that will help people work together better remotely.

When you are co-present, the distance between you disappears.
Photo by Brooke Cagle on Unsplash

To bring co-presence into a remote engagement, I ask myself this question as I’m
preparing for it: What approaches and tools will work best for this group in
this situation to increase their sense of co-presence? The answer will be
different depending on the size of the group, who is in it, and what you all
need to accomplish together.

Here are some of the ways I do it:

* Request (coax, if necessary) that people use a video camera for conversations
that are personal in nature, like check-ins and check-outs.
* Ask people to choose a photograph, either one of theirs or one that they like
from a site like Unsplash, and share it while they tell us briefly why they
chose it. (I use this as an icebreaker, or right after a break in a longer
engagement.)
* Set up small breakout groups so people can connect with a few other people
while they work, rather than always being in a large group. Mix up the
breakouts for different activities.
* Establish a chat backchannel and encourage people to use it while working
(yes, even in a meeting) if they have questions, off-topic ideas, or just
want some individual connection.
* Let go of the feeling that I need to control every interaction in order to
stay “in charge,” and accept that technology can mediate interactions that
I’m not party to — and don’t need to be party to. In other words, allow
people to whisper behind my back.

These are just a few of the many solutions to this problem. Once you begin to
think about helping people create a sense of co-presence, it changes the way you
structure the engagement and the way you show up online.

I try always to plan for and to consider all three of these common problems when
designing a remote engagement. I hope this helps you create engagements that
connect and inspire you and the people you work with.

Footnotes

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[1] That is to say, they are not yet as invisible and reliable as the landline
telephone, which could be used by anyone whether or not they had any
understanding of how it worked. You still need to know too much about remote
collaborative tools for them to be truly comfortable yet.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2] Smith, R. (2014). Collaborative bandwidth: creating better virtual meetings.
Organization Development Journal, 32(4), 15-35. An excerpt of the article is
available on The Grove’s website. The link on that page to download the full
article no longer works, but libraries and scholarly databases usually include
OD Journal.

TELL A FRIEND:

LIKE THIS:

Like Loading...

Leave a comment

Posted in everything

Tagged collaboration, remotecollaboration, remotemeetings

HABIT TRACKER: GET THOSE NEW TECH TOOLS UNDER CONTROL

Posted on March 26, 2020 by Rachel | Leave a comment

As you’re ramping up with working, teaching, facilitating, and meeting online,
you’re probably encountering new tools that you haven’t used before. (At least,
I hope you are; there are a lot of useful tools out there to support whatever
kind of work you need to do.) I’m sure it feels like a trackless jungle most of
the time. Don’t worry. That’s not because you’re bad at technology. It’s because
you’re a normal human.

That’s a lot of options. Photo by Balázs Kétyi on Unsplash

Have you ever had to change email clients? If so, you probably remember feeling
very disoriented at first. Maybe you missed some important emails, sent the
wrong attachments to people, or accidentally copied people you didn’t mean to
include. It may have felt like you were learning how to use email all over
again. And in a sense, you were.

Through use, you built up a lot of unconscious knowledge about how your old
email client displayed information and where the controls were. All that
unconscious knowledge gave you the power to gain understanding at a glance. You
could instantly tell whether you had unread messages or whether you’d responded
to something, because you knew how to read the signals. Until you get
comfortable with those signals in your new email client, you are likely to feel
wrong-footed.

In interface design, those signals are called affordances. One example that’s
pretty universal for email clients is that an unread message appears in bold in
the message list. Once it’s read, it’s no longer bold. This affordance is so
effective that almost all email clients take advantage of it, which is why that
part of your new email system probably didn’t feel weird.

Understanding the affordances is how you know what to pay attention to in order
to get the information you need. But until you understand them, you have to pay
attention to everything all the time, because you don’t reflexively know which
affordances give you which information. It’s exhausting, it’s frustrating, and
it leads to mistakes. Not just with email clients, but with any tool you’re
learning how to use.

Until you learn a tool’s affordances, it will feel clunky and awkward. It takes
about two weeks of daily use before those affordances are internalized, which
means It takes about two weeks of daily use with a new tool before you become
comfortable with it.

I’ll say that again. It takes about two weeks of daily use to become comfortable
using a new technology tool, no matter what it is or what it’s for.

There’s no shortcut to this. You can watch tutorial videos (and I recommend that
you do), you can have someone show you the basics (also a good idea), but only
daily use will fix those affordances in your mind so that you can understand the
interface at a glance.

Therefore, I offer this printable habit tracker. Print it out, write in the
names of the tools you’re trying to get comfortable with, then fill in the
bubble for every day you use the tool for at least 10 minutes. I like to pick a
different colored pencil for each tool, but that’s just me. You do you.

And because we’re all swimming in uncharted waters right now as we self-isolate
to flatten the curve and prevent the spread of covid-19, there’s also a section
for lifestyle changes you want to remember to make. Some suggestions for what
you might write in there:

* Drink 8 cups of water
* Exercise (be specific, like “do 5 pushups” or “jog in place for 15 minutes”)
* Limit of 1 alcoholic drink per day
* Call a friend or relative

You get the idea.

Download the Habit Tracker (free PDF) (17675 downloads )

Keep the tracker handy and bubble in the circles as you do each item throughout
the day. Don’t attach a lot of judgment to this. Think of it as data collection;
you don’t have to do it perfectly.

But until you’ve filled in 14 bubbles for that new tool, be patient with it and
with yourself.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0
International License.

TELL A FRIEND:

LIKE THIS:

Like Loading...

Leave a comment

Posted in everything

Tagged downloads, tools

HOW TO GET PEOPLE TO SPEAK UP IN YOUR REMOTE SESSIONS

Posted on March 20, 2020 by Rachel | 5 comments

You’ve been in that meeting. Usually it’s a remote meeting, but not always. The
presenter or facilitator has just finished a segment, and they say, “Any
questions or comments? Questions? No? Okay, let’s move on,” and the meeting
sweeps on before you manage to get your question out.

Photo by AllGo – An App For Plus Size People on Unsplash

Or maybe you’ve been that presenter. You want to answer people’s questions, so
you say, “Any questions or comments?” Then the silence stretches on for a year
or two and you nervously continue: “Anyone? No? Okay, let’s move on,” all the
while wishing that someone had asked a question or shared a remark.

Interestingly, whenever one of those happens in a meeting, the other one is
usually happening too. That year-long pause for the facilitator or presenter is
really only a couple of seconds long. However, that person is experiencing
something called podium time, or the terrifying skewing of any period of silence
so that it seems to go on forever no matter how short it actually is. (Another
quality of podium time is that the time available for any given agenda item
passes at an accelerated rate, but that’s a topic for another post.)

We have a fear of radio silence, and as the person in charge, we feel it’s our
job to prevent it. But I want to encourage you to think of silence as your
friend, if what you want is to get people to ask questions or share their
comments. It’s hard to do. Here’s how I taught myself to embrace the silence and
make space for people to talk.

1. Leave enough space for people to respond. It takes someone a few seconds to
mentally frame a question or remark, and another few seconds to decide to speak.
In a remote session, it takes a few more seconds after that to decide that no
one else is going to start talking so it’s safe to speak up. If you don’t give
people all those seconds, nothing will happen.

I do it by keeping a beverage handy. After I ask for questions and comments, I
pick up my beverage — slowly — and take a sip. I might take a second sip. Then I
slowly set the beverage back down. Almost every time, someone is speaking by the
time I’ve placed it back on my desk.

Take a nice slow sip. Photo by BBH Singapore on Unsplash

This is especially useful if you’re on video, because everyone can then see you
are committed to your beverage and you aren’t going to be talking for a few
seconds while you sip.

2. Ask for participation in an inviting way. There’s a world of difference
between these two openers:

“Any questions?”

and

“What questions do you have?”

The first one, “Any questions?” is okay, but not great. It carries a tiny
implication that you don’t actually expect anyone to ask anything. While we’re
used to hearing it, it’s not the most inviting way to ask for remarks. It says,
“I have to stop in case anyone is confused, but otherwise I’d like to keep
going.”

The second one, on the other hand, says, “I imagine you must have questions, and
I’m looking forward to hearing what they are.” It’s an inviting way to make
space.

Likewise, when asking people to participate in a conversation, some ways of
framing the invitation are better than others. This is useful when you’re trying
to encourage a group discussion about something. Consider these two phrases:

“Anyone have any comments about this?”

and

“What would you like to say about this?”

Again, the first one is a little dismissive. There’s a slight implication that
you’ll pause, but only if anyone really wants to say something. The second one
indicates that you expect people to have something to say, and you’re ready to
listen. It’s especially effective combined with the beverage trick, which makes
it crystal clear that you’re not moving on for a while.

3. Ask people to stay off of mute. There are two reasons I prefer small groups
to remain un-muted. First, it’s a hurdle to participation. A small one, sure,
but it’s there, and I want people to be able to act on their impulse to speak.
Second, it allows the chuckles and the gasps and the other small sounds to come
through, which really brings a group alive.

The exception is when there is sudden or temporary background noise. People
obviously can and should mute if they need to sneeze, cough, or speak to someone
near them; or if there is intrusive environmental noise like construction
sounds, dogs barking, and so on.

If the session is a one-way presentation given to many people, the norms are
different and I am more likely ask people to mute by default. But for teamwork,
groupwork, and small workshops or classes, keeping everyone’s microphone hot can
increase participation.

4. Learn to love the silence. This isn’t easy, but it’s essential. That silence
after you invite participation is actually your friend. It’s easy to imagine
that everyone is wishing you’d just move on, already — and in all likelihood,
someone in the group is probably feeling that way, which is fine. But it’s also
likely that other people do want to ask or say something, and it’s important to
give them the space.

Pause and embrace the silence. Photo by Mateus Campos Felipe on Unsplash

When you allow the silence to exist, you create a vacancy that others can lean
into and fill. If you welcome the silence and sit in it calmly, it will be an
inviting silence: a step back so that others can step forward.

TELL A FRIEND:

LIKE THIS:

Like Loading...

5 Comments

Posted in everything

Tagged facilitation, remotecollaboration, remotemeetings, virtualmeetings,
virtualteams, webconferencing

A CRASH COURSE IN TRANSLATING YOUR PROCESS TO A VIRTUAL SETTING

Posted on March 15, 2020 by Rachel | 10 comments

Your meeting room is all prepared. Your templates, markers, and sticky notes are
at hand. But you and your client are both (very properly) practicing social
distancing. So you have a face-to-face process for [strategy, visioning,
brainstorming, decision-making, you name it], and you suddenly need to deliver
this session remotely. You don’t even know where to start. Great! Let’s do this.

Photo by Febrian Zakaria on Unsplash.

This is a bare-bones crash course in how to translate your face-to-face offering
to a virtual one. We’ll cover:

* Your mindset
* Your mental model
* Converting your existing agenda
* Getting help
* Matching processes with tools
* Common problems you may encounter

It can be a lot more complex than this, but this is a good starting point if
you’ve never done it before. Throughout, I’ve named tools that I personally
prefer, but you can choose others that do the same thing. Let’s go.

YOUR MINDSET

First, stop panicking. This is do-able, and you can do it. Also, your
participants really need you to hold the container for them while they work, and
you can’t do that effectively while you are panicking. So leave the panic at the
door.

Second, accept that something will go wrong, and when it does, embrace it. I’ve
done remote sessions for years and I still open each one with the thought, “Hmm,
I wonder what will go wrong today?” I phrase it a little differently, though. I
think to myself, “Hmm, I wonder what I will learn today?” Everything that goes
wrong is a gift, because it teaches you something you didn’t know. It’s okay.
Remain calm, explain what’s happening, and work the problem. It’ll be fine.

Third, let go of the fear that your virtual session will by definition be worse
than your face-to-face one would have been. That isn’t necessarily true,
especially for some kinds of work which are actually easier to do online. Accept
that it will be a different experience, not necessarily a worse one, and aim to
provide the best experience that you can.

YOUR MENTAL MODEL

This part is for those who have almost no experience in virtual settings, so you
can wrap your mind around how it’s set up. Skip this section if you’ve
participated in a bunch of remote sessions before. Otherwise, read on.

You’ll have a meeting room, just like you do any other time. People will connect
to the meeting room and remain in it for the duration of the session. The tool I
use to create the meeting room is Zoom. Everyone connects to the same Zoom link
and can use a phone or their computer to hear what’s going on. They can see each
other (if they’re using video cameras) and anything that I’m sharing on my
screen too. Only the host (me, or you in your case) needs a Zoom account.

You’ll have supporting tools, like you do in any other session. Instead of
sticky notes, paper charts, and paper templates, you’ll use digital tools so
your participants can engage in the hands-on activities you want them to do.
They will connect to these tools using a web browser, while they are still
connected to the meeting in Zoom. You give the link to the supporting tool or
tools (go easy — multiple tools get confusing really fast), and everyone
connects to it. I use tools like MURAL for sticky notes and visual templates,
Trello for kanban boards, and Google Docs for shared editing.

A diagram of my typical set up with Zoom, Mural, and an iPad for graphic
recording.

> Pro tip: Usually, people are either looking at Zoom or they are looking at the
> shared tool, so if you are going to be working in a shared tool for a while,
> have people turn off their video camera in Zoom. Even when they are in Zoom
> breakout groups while using a shared tool, their focus will be on the tool,
> not on Zoom. Turning off the video camera can make the audio clearer and the
> tools load faster for people with limited bandwidth.

If you do graphic capture, you’ll also have a tablet (iPad or similar) that you
can write on. You’ll share this screen in the Zoom session while you’re
capturing. I use Concepts as my drawing app, but I recommend others for
first-timers.

CONVERTING YOUR EXISTING AGENDA

The basic crash-course process for this consists of five steps:

1. Take out 25% of your activities (or make your session 50% longer). You can’t
get as much done in the same amount of time, especially when you’re new at
this. Transitions will eat up a lot more time than you expect. See this post
for more details, including when to add breaks.

2. Identify the process you are using at each stage in your agenda, then select
a tool that matches it and supports its desired outcome(s). Use as few tools
as possible, even if it means using the same tool for two or more different
activities. See the table below.

3. Create any templates or other materials you need so that they are ready in
the selected tools. Include instructions right in the tool whenever
possible, so that they can refer back to them if they get confused.

4. Visualize the transitions you will be asking participants to make between
tools. How will you help them make the switch and get oriented? How will you
teach them the basics of the tool so they are able to do what you ask them
to do? How will you support them when they get stuck? Answer these questions
for yourself, and you will be better able to support them through the
session. Draw a diagram of the transitions between tools for your own
reference. Make notes on your copy of the agenda to remind you what to say
and when to say it.

5. Practice with each tool beforehand. Make mistakes, so that when participants
make the same mistake, you can help them out. Do everything you are asking
them to do. Find out where you need to give extra instructions to prevent
mishaps.

GETTING HELP

Everyone is trying to learn this very fast right now. Several of the tools I use
either have fantastic online tutorials (I’m looking at you, Zoom) or have staff
who can help guide you through the basics, or both. Sign up for a demo webinar
(thank you, MURAL) if they are on offer. Google the name of your tool plus
“tutorial” or “demo” to find what’s available.

The new meeting space! Embrace it. Photo by Burst on Unsplash.

MATCHING PROCESSES WITH TOOLS

Here is a list of common processes that you might need to use, and tools that
support them. It’s obviously not an exhaustive list, but these are some of the
most common things I do in virtual sessions. Again, I’ve listed my favorite
tools; there are many others available.

Process You Want to Do
(links in this column go to how-to articles)Tools That Support It
(links in this column go to the tool’s website)Breakout groupsZoomBreakout
groups with templates and sticky notesZoom, along with:
MURAL, pre-loaded with your templateCheck in circleZoom, sharing an image of the
participants in a circleCreating or editing a shared piece of writingGoogle Docs
or Office 365Creating or editing a shared presentationGoogle Docs or Office
365Discussion circleZoom, using video if you canDot votingMURALFishbowlZoomFlow
charts, roadmaps, quad grids, other visual toolsMURAL or Google Slides or Office
365Graphic recordingZoom, along with:
iPad or tablet and drawing program of choiceKanban boardsTrello or MURALLooking
at a shared resourceZoom, using screen sharingPollingZoomSticky
notesMURALThreaded conversations, text chat, sidebar conversationsSlack

COMMON PROBLEMS YOU MAY ENCOUNTER

Problem: People behind firewalls can’t access certain tools.

Solution: Have them do a pre-meeting tech check. Some tools have a test link
(for instance, Zoom’s is here). For others, like MURAL or Google Docs, set up an
open-access test document and send the link to your participants ahead of time.

Problem: People get lost switching between tools.

Solution: Visualize how this will work before you start. Give clear, explicit
instructions, both verbally and written down in the tool they will use. Spend an
extra minute making sure everyone is with you before you start. Have a colleague
or volunteer present who can help stragglers figure out how to get where you
are.

Problem: Not everyone has a video camera.

Solution: Ask the group what they prefer to do in this case: turn off all
cameras, or have people use them if they are available. Keep in mind that the
people who show up on video will have more perceived power and will have a
different experience than those who don’t. Personally, I tend to be an
all-or-nothing facilitator when it comes to video, but it’s up to you and your
group.

Problem: Someone can’t connect to one of the tools.

Solution: If you have a tech helper, ask them to work with the person. If it
just can’t be resolved, pair that person up with a buddy who is responsible for
making sure that person’s ideas and input get added to the shared document.
Share your screen through Zoom so they can watch what’s happening in the tool,
even if they can’t get there themselves.

Caution: This is the only time you should screen share a tool that people are
actively using. Otherwise, some folks will get lost between the real tool and
your screen share, and they are likely to get confused at some point.

Problem: Someone’s audio or video suddenly stops working when it had been
working before.

Solution: Ask them to leave the meeting and re-join. If that doesn’t work, ask
them to leave the meeting, reboot their computer, and then re-join. Usually that
fixes it.

Problem: There’s a ton of background noise from someone’s microphone that’s
making it hard for others to hear.

Solution: In working sessions, I prefer to have everyone stay off mute; the
conversation flows more naturally that way. However, sometimes there is a lot of
noise in one location. Look on the participant list in Zoom to see whose
microphone icon is filling up with green, and politely ask that person to mute
themselves unless they need to say something until the noise has stopped.

Caution: It’s difficult to switch back to Zoom to mute and unmute while working
in one of the web-based tools if you’re not used to it. Give people extra time
to do this. They can return to Zoom by selecting its icon (blue with a white
video symbol) from their task tray (PC) or dock (Mac).

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I hope this crash course helps you find a starting point. As you do this more,
you’ll get more comfortable with it. Remember that people are generally
supportive when you invite them along on a learning journey like this. And good
luck!

TELL A FRIEND:

* Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
* Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
* Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
* Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
* 5Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)5
*

LIKE THIS:

Like Loading...

10 Comments

Posted in everything

Tagged collaboration, facilitation, howto, remotecollaboration, remotemeetings,
virtualmeetings, webconferencing

HELP! THEY WANT ME TO DO REMOTE GRAPHIC RECORDING NEXT WEEK!

Posted on March 13, 2020 by Rachel | Leave a comment

With many face-to-face events (wisely) being switched to remote events right
now, I’ve seen a lot of questions go by on Facebook from graphic recorders who
are being asked if they can work their magic remotely. You can! Even if you’ve
never done it before, you can. I’ve got you.

My first (test) recording using the Concepts app

The screen shots in this post were made using Concepts on an iPad. If you have a
different drawing app, a non-iPad tablet, or you’re using a drawing tablet with
your computer, the basic points are the same; just find the equivalent tools in
the application that you have. Check the bottom of the post for a list of common
applications and links to their tutorials.

HERE’S THE LIST OF WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW.*

1. Set up three brushes and an eraser.
2. Choose a simple and limited color palette, and save the palette for quick
reference.
3. Set up three layers, name them, and don’t panic when you get them mixed up.
4. Set aside 2-6 hours just to practice.
5. Get a headset that’s comfortable and reliable.
6. Ask for a 30-minute tech check sometime before the meeting begins.

Those are the basics. Everything else is optional for the moment.

There is a little more detail to each of those steps, of course. Let’s take a
look.

1. SET UP THREE BRUSHES AND AN ERASER.

I use a small solid brush for most of my lines and letters; a larger solid brush
for color fills; and a slightly larger watercolor brush for shadows and pastel
effects. My eraser is usually sized in between the two solid brush sizes.

My brushes in Concepts. The numbers are the size in pixels (2.5 for the outline,
19.7 for the eraser, 10 for the pastel, and 7.4 for the color fill). Ignore the
other brushes for now.

If you want to do solid titles rather than outline & fill, you will also want a
larger brush for the titles (or know how to quickly switch between a large and
small pen size for your single lettering brush).

> Pro tip for neat lettering: With the canvas at 100% zoom (that is, fully
> zoomed out so you can see the whole page), make a mark like the upright of a
> capital letter (like P or R or I or D) at the scale (size) you want to write
> in. Zoom in to a comfortable level for writing, note where the upright is, tap
> undo to get rid of it, and start writing where it was, at the scale that it
> was. Zoom out now and then to check your orientation.

I set my brushes up in advance and save them for easy access. Ideally, you will
be able to see them all at the same time and just tap to switch.

Can you use more? Sure. Do you want to? Eventually. This week, stick to three.
Trust me.

2. CHOOSE A SIMPLE AND LIMITED COLOR PALETTE, AND SAVE IT FOR QUICK REFERENCE.

This one is so important that it’s worth looking up a tutorial for how to do it
in your tool if it isn’t obvious. My most basic palette has black, a pastel
blue, a pastel grey, a bright blue, and red. Sometimes I swap in another color
for the two blues for different recordings. I also have white in my palette, but
I use it rarely, and sometimes I include a yellow for glow and highlight
effects.

My most basic color palette for the Concepts app. Concepts allows up to 8 colors
in one palette, so sometimes I add yellow.

I use black for lettering and for outlining my icons. Red is for emphasis. Light
blue is for pastel effects and light gray is for shadows and fills (shadows are
done with the pastel brush and fills with the color fill brush). Bright blue is
for splashes of color in icons and titles.

Like the brushes, you want to be able to see all the colors in a permanent or
flyout palette and just tap the one you need. Can you use more colors? Of
course. Eventually. This week, keep it simple.

3. SET UP THREE LAYERS, NAME THEM, AND DON’T PANIC WHEN YOU GET THEM MIXED UP.

From bottom to top, the layers are: pastels, color, line-work. Or whatever names
will remind you of those classifications. That way, your letters and outlines
are on top, colors slip neatly behind the outlines, and you can gaily sweep
pastels behind icons and letters with no fear of messing up the clarity.

My basic layers setup. Concepts allows you to assign a brush to a particular
layer, which helps make sure I don’t mix them up, but I still manage to do it
sometimes.

You will mix up the layers at some point and put your outlines on your pastel
layer or vice versa. If it’s the pastel on the outline layer, it’s immediately
obvious and you can hit ‘undo’ and fix it. It’s harder to notice when you start
writing on your pastel or color layer. Don’t stress when you do notice, and
don’t undo a lot of writing. Just make a new layer, drag it to the bottom of the
stack, and start using that for your pastels or colors as needed. There are no
layer police and you will be fine.

4. SET ASIDE 2-6 HOURS TO PRACTICE.

And you can guess which end of that scale I’d rather you were on, right? The
more you practice, the calmer you will be; the calmer you are, the better your
work will be. It will take a while to get the hang of zooming in to write and
zooming back out to check sizing, of switching pens and colors, of working with
the layers. Don’t stress.

The very first graphic recording I ever did on an iPad, back in 2011.
… And this is a few years later, in 2014. See where a little practice will get
you?

Here’s a practice regime that I use when testing a new drawing app:

* Set up layers, pens, and colors. Take time to mess with the settings until
you understand how they work — up to 30 minutes.

* Write your name, draw some icons or people, practice the stuff that makes
your work yours — about 15 minutes. This is not the most valuable practice
activity, so don’t spend the bulk of your time here. This is just a warm up.

* Find a photo of a chart you’ve done that you like. Try to recreate it on the
iPad. This will teach you more about how your app works than almost anything
else. Notice what you can and can’t recreate, adjust your brushes and colors,
and get comfortable with your own style — up to 3 hours. I don’t recommend
tracing a photo, because you won’t really understand how your app handles
scale if you do that. Instead, look at a copy of the chart and recreate it on
a blank screen.

Next, go to TED.com or find a podcast or a news channel or something that you
can listen to and record. Pick an episode and play it. Record it as it plays,
then play it again and just look at your recording while you listen. Notice
what you got and what you missed. You’ll miss more than you are used to,
especially at first, but always.

Let me say that again. You will always miss more when you are digitally
graphically recording than when you are doing it on paper. Everyone does.
It’s because the interface is more complicated than paper and pen, so a part
of your brain that usually helps you listen and record is always dealing with
the interface instead.

Play another video or podcast and record that one. Do this three or four
times. Take a minute to compare your last one with your first one — see the
progress? You can totally do this.

This is also the time when you want to get yourself into weird interface
places so you can get yourself out of them. If you accidentally hit a button
and the whole screen changes and it takes you 15 minutes to figure out why
and how to undo it, that’s a gift: next time it happens, you’ll know how to
fix it.

Spend up to 2 hours on this part.

So much for the recording part. The rest is technical details.

5. GET A HEADSET THAT’S COMFORTABLE AND RELIABLE.

You’ll work better if you can hear clearly and if your ear doesn’t hurt (ask me
how I know). ‘Nuff said. I use the Plantronics Savi 730.

6. ASK FOR A 30-MINUTE TECH CHECK SOMETIME BEFORE THE MEETING BEGINS.

The tech crew will want to know a couple of things from their end, but they
don’t know what you need to know. Here’s what you need to check:

* Ask to be put in the exact audio setup that the meeting or conference will
use, and ask someone to speak from the place(s) where the speaker(s) will be
sitting or standing. (If it’s a Zoom meeting where everyone will dial in
separately, you don’t have to ask for this specially, because the tech check
itself should be set up the same way.) Make sure you can hear.
* Test how to mute your microphone so that you can cuss if you need to without
everyone hearing it. (Again, ask me how I know.) Make sure you really are
muted and that you know how to unmute. Clarify whether it’s okay for you to
speak up if you can’t hear, or if there’s some other way they want you to
handle this, like typing in the chat box or texting someone.
* Share your iPad or tablet screen into the meeting and get them to confirm
what they can see. Draw a little, and ask them to tell you how fast it shows
up for them. Notice if there’s any drawing lag on your end while you are
connected that isn’t there when you’re not connected (there shouldn’t be, but
it’s not unheard of).
* Ask whether they expect to switch between you and anyone’s slides or other
shared materials, and get clear on what the schedule and expectations are if
that’s going to happen. If you will have to click buttons on your end to make
this happen, practice sharing and un-sharing your screen until it’s easy.

Make sure your device is charged, including the stylus, if you’re using an Apple
Pencil or other stylus that has a battery. If possible, plug in to power while
you work. If you’re using an iPad with Zoom, connect your iPad to the computer
with the charging cable and share it through the cable. You’ll get a better
connection and your iPad will charge while you work.

Finally, and perhaps most importantly, don’t panic. Stuff will go wrong. You’ll
lose a brush or a color. You’ll mess up layers. The app will quit in the middle
(or you’ll accidentally hit the round button and minimize the app when you
didn’t mean to; ask me how I know…). Just keep breathing. It’s not the end of
the world. Everyone is upside down right now because of all the rapid changes
and the uncertainty of what will happen today, tomorrow, or next week. Be calm,
and people will support you as you do your best, even if you screw up.

Ask me how I know.

Q & A

Q. What if my app can’t hide my drawing tools?
This is a nice-to-have feature, where you can see the tools but the participants
can’t. If the app you choose doesn’t have it, don’t worry about it. It’s
infinitely better to use an app that you are comfortable with that doesn’t have
this feature, than to struggle with one you don’t like that does.

Q. Should I use the lasso tool to move or resize stuff?
Not if this is your first rodeo, no. (Sorry-not-sorry about the pun.) You can
tweak it post-production if it really bugs you, but just go with what you’ve got
while you’re working live. Better to keep moving.

Q. My app lets me make icons ahead of time and just paste them in, but you
didn’t mention that. Why not?
Because it will slow you down. It feels like a shortcut, but as you’re learning
how to listen and write and use the app, it will slow you down too much. It’s
tempting, but leave it for now. You can work up to that later.

Q. What’s the best drawing app to use?
If you are totally at a loss as to where to start, try Procreate. I’ve done
these screen shots with Concepts because it’s what I currently use when I
record, to the point that I’ve lost facility with other apps. However, I don’t
recommend Concepts to a beginner. It’s powerful, but boy is the interface
confusing. Plus it lacks a quick way to zoom back to 100% size, which can trip
you up.

In reality, the best app to use is the one that feels good to you, which may or
may not be Procreate or Concepts. Try a few and see which seems to make the most
sense, then use that one. This is worth taking a little time to do.

I’ve listed some common options here; there are others. Some of these may not
have all the features I mention in this article, like a watercolor brush or
layers. If you find that you love one that doesn’t have those features, great.
Make it work for you using the tools that it does have. I’ve also linked to a
tutorial for each app, when I could find a good one.

* Procreate (tutorial)
* Concepts (tutorial)
* Paper (tutorial)
* Autodesk Sketchbook (tutorial)
* Inkflow Plus (tutorial)
* ArtRage (tutorial)
* neu.Draw (no tutorial found)

Q. What’s the best stylus to use?
Again, the one that feels most comfortable to you. I use an Apple Pencil.

Q. You’re sure I can do this?
Positive. You got this. Go help people stop traveling.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* This is the crash-course, bare-minimum,
starting-from-zero-got-to-do-it-in-five-days level of information. There’s a lot
more to it than this, but this will get you going.

TELL A FRIEND:

* Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
* Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
* Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
* Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
* 2Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)2
*

LIKE THIS:

Like Loading...

Leave a comment

Posted in everything

Tagged graphicrecording, howto, ipad, remotemeetings

RED, GREEN, BLUE: A SPEEDY PROCESS FOR SORTING BRAINSTORM IDEAS

Posted on March 2, 2020 by Rachel | 3 comments

Using a sticky note tool for brainstorming in remote meetings is a wonderful
method to gather a lot of different ideas quickly. But once those ideas are up
on the shared board, the task of sorting through them and choosing which options
to pursue can be daunting. Here’s a method for tackling all that information and
turning it into a manageable dataset, and a list of some of the pros and cons of
doing it this way.

STEP 1: GET THE IDEAS OUT.

Gather your remote team and get them into the same sticky note board using
whatever tool you prefer. (My example here was done in Mural.) Pose a good
question and ask them to write one idea per sticky note. They can place ideas
anywhere on the board. To make later steps easier, ask them all to use the same
color note; yellow, for instance. Anything but red, green, or blue. (A nice
feature of Mural is that it’s easy to turn a bunch of notes all the same color
in one click, even after they’ve been created.)

A wall of words — fresh from the brainstorm! Click the images if you want to
read the notes.

STEP 2: GET THE IDEAS ORGANIZED. NO JUDGMENT!

As a group, spend some time clustering the notes and removing or consolidating
duplicates. At this stage, you’re just looking for things that are alike. You’re
not evaluating anything. You can do this any way you like; if you have a
high-energy group, ask them to silently cluster the notes all at the same time,
and watch them fly around the board.

If your group is larger, or if you have some folks who are unfamiliar with the
tool you’re using, silent clusters can be a little alarming and you might want
to take a slower pass as a whole group, or assign sections of the board to
breakout groups and then come together to finalize the clusters.

Make sure the clusters are clear and that all the notes in each cluster belong
in that group. Naming each cluster as you go is helpful, too.

Sticky notes clustered into groups. The pink notes are the cluster labels.

STEP 3: IN, OUT, OR DISCUSS?

Make sure your guiding question is clear, and change it if you need to. The
question must help participants decide whether ideas are in or out of scope. For
example, in the fictitious brainstorm shown in my screenshots, the original
question was, “What are the toughest problems with remote facilitation?” At this
stage, though, I would need to amend the question to add, “… and which problems
do we want to prioritize solving for our team?” There needs to be some reason
for people to decide whether to keep or discard each idea, so make sure your
question is pertinent. This second question makes the end goal clear: We are
selecting priorities for action.

Now work through one cluster at a time. Set this up by saying something like,
“We’re going to do a quick first pass on the ideas in each cluster. I’ll read
out a note, and you tell me if it’s definitely IN, definitely OUT, or needs more
discussion.”

Then further explain the labels:

In: An idea the group definitely wants to accept or adopt. It’s a no-brainer, a
table-stakes item, something you’re already working on, or just plain required.

Out: An idea that doesn’t require any further consideration. It’s out of scope,
technically impossible, too expensive (time or money), duplicates another idea
already under consideration, or was meant as a joke.

More discussion: Anything else, including things that some people think are “in”
and others think are “out.”

Work through each cluster note by note. If the group agrees unanimously that an
idea is IN, turn the note green. If they agree unanimously that it’s OUT, turn
it red. Otherwise, turn it blue.

As you read each note, people may only say “In,” “Green,” “Out,” “Red,”
“Discuss,” or “Blue.” Again, if opinions on a given note are divided, it’s blue.
Even if one person thinks something different from everyone else, turn it blue.

Work through all the clusters. When you’re done, all the notes should be either
red, green, or blue.

> Asynchronous or silent option: If this is too time-consuming or
> tedious-sounding for your group, you can use another method. Open up the board
> to voting, and ask each person to vote only on those ideas they think should
> be IN. If there’s a note that someone thinks should be discussed, they can
> turn it blue. If a note is OUT, leave it alone. Take a sweep through at the
> end. Any notes that have the same number of votes as people become green. Any
> notes that have no votes become red. Notes that are blue stay blue, and notes
> that have some votes but not the total possible number of votes also become
> blue. This can be done in between meetings to free up meeting time for
> discussion.
>
> Note that some sticky note boards don’t have a vote option, and some have the
> option but don’t let you limit how many votes a person can put on a single
> idea. You have to invoke the honor system, but people usually play fair.

Working through each cluster. In this image, five clusters have been dealt with
already, revealing four accepted ideas (green) and five ideas that need further
discussion (blue). Notice that we’ve refined the guiding question here as well.

STEP 4: DEAL WITH THE BLUES.

The group can now ignore the red notes; they don’t matter. The green ones can
float to the top or side (or leave them where they are) — they will move forward
into the next phase, but you don’t need to talk about them now.

For each blue note:

Call the group’s attention to the note so they are all looking at the same
thing. Ask, “What do we need to talk about here?” Facilitate the conversation,
helping them work through the issues. At the end, the note should either be
turned red or turned green. It’s perfectly okay to revise the note before
changing the color, but it needs to be red or green at the end.

When you’re done, everything on the board should either be red or green (or a
cluster name). Copy the green notes into a new workspace.

Talking about the blue ideas to get clarity and decide whether to make them red
or green. The plain-text annotations are just for illustration here; I don’t
write them on the sticky note board.

STEP 5: WORK WITH THE GREENS.

Working with the duplicated green notes, you can re-cluster (if needed — I
usually don’t), dot vote, place the notes on a hi-low grid or a risk wall or
something similar, or use the method(s) of your choice to decide which ideas to
implement or adopt. Every idea has been considered, but no time has been wasted
on ideas that don’t merit (or don’t need) discussion.

These are the green ideas from all of the original cluster groups, and this is
one way to assess the relative value of the selected ideas. The ones in the
lower right will yield the greatest impact for the least effort, in the group’s
opinion.

PROS:

* This method takes an overwhelming number of choices and turns it into a
manageable number of choices pretty quickly.
* As the group moves through the process, they feel a great sense of speed and
progress rather than feeling bogged down or stuck.
* It can bring in different voices, because people often have strong opinions
about some of the notes and less strong opinions about others. They tend to
speak up when they care about an idea.

CONS:

* This can be a tough exercise for people who are color blind. See if your
sticky note tool allows you to highlight notes in another way, such as
changing the shape (star? stop sign? triangle?) or adding a sticker (check
mark? X mark? question mark?).
* Be careful about getting bogged down in conversation as you turn notes blue.
Cut off blossoming discussions and let the group know you’ll get back to it
once the notes are sorted out.
* It’s possible for a vocal subset of the group to take over, causing others to
check out. Manage this by asking for different voices to speak up, asking
more vocal people to step back, or assigning a different champion to each
cluster. Using the asynchronous or silent voting option can help combat this
problem.

IN-ROOM ADAPTATION

If you’re working with real sticky notes in a co-located meeting, you can still
use this method. Grab markers in green, red, and blue. Add a big green checkmark
to the “in” sticky notes. Make a big red “x” on the “out” sticky notes. Write a
blue question mark on the “discuss” notes. Just make your marks in the edges of
the notes, not over the words, so that people can read the original notes later.
To change a blue note to a green or red one, cross out the question mark and add
the appropriate green or red marking.

TELL A FRIEND:

* Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
* Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
* Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
* Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
* 6Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)6
*

LIKE THIS:

Like Loading...

3 Comments

Posted in everything

Tagged collaboration, facilitation, howto, remotecollaboration, virtualmeetings,
visualpractice

READING THE VIRTUAL ROOM

Posted on June 12, 2019 by Rachel | 5 comments

This is a question I get asked a lot: How do you ‘read the room’ when you’re
meeting virtually? In other words, how can you tell whether people are tracking
or checked out, where the group energy is, and when it’s time for a break or
some other shift? My answer: it’s not actually all that different from reading
the room in face-to-face settings, although we tend to think it is.

It’s stressful for a skilled in-room facilitator to imagine working without the
body language cues that are so familiar and so revealing, I know. But I think we
make this harder than it is. There’s an expectation that because we lose body
language, a virtual meeting won’t be as good as being in the room together and
that it’s going to be an inferior experience.

But it doesn’t have to be. Start with an engaging agenda, where people have
things to do that will achieve outcomes they care about. Let them create, write,
draw, discuss, decide. Give them tools to support doing that work at a distance.
Ask good, thought-provoking questions. Then get out of the way.

To read the room, look for the same things that you look for in a face-to-face
gathering. The only difference is that instead of ‘body language,’ you’re tuning
in more to tone of voice, evidence of activity, and the clues that you can get
from the collaborative tools you’ve selected.

Are people working? Are they digging in to the things they need to talk about or
build? Keep tabs on how many different people are participating — just a few, or
most, or pretty much everyone? If there’s silence, is it paired with intense
creation (generating sticky notes, writing in a document, whatever) or is it
paired with a lack of activity? If it’s the former, there’s no problem; let them
work.

On the other hand, if there’s a lot of silence and nothing seems to be
happening, that’s a cue that something maybe wrong. If that’s what I notice, I
will usually make a neutral observation about it and then simply ask what’s up.
That might look like this:

“I’m noticing that it’s been quiet for a couple of minutes and I’m not seeing
anything show up on the shared tool we’re using. Is something not working well
for you that we can maybe change?” I have no way of knowing why people aren’t
participating unless I ask them. If I’ve created the right container, there’s
enough safety that people can speak up and tell me what’s going on for them. I
can then make adjustments as needed to re-engage the group, take a break, or
help them tease out whatever issue is causing the block.

Here’s a sampling of responses I’ve gotten to that question in the past, to give
you an idea of what you might hear:

* What are we supposed to be doing, again? (My instructions weren’t clear)
* We can’t open/find the collaborative tool (Again, this is on me to get them
where they need to be)
* We can’t answer this question because we don’t have enough information (Time
to reframe the question)
* This isn’t the right thing for us to be talking about right now (Let’s find
out what the right thing is, and talk about that)
* We don’t see how this activity will get us to our outcome (I can briefly
explain how I think it will and ask for suggestions that would make it work
better for them)
* All of us have just gotten an emergency text and we’re looking at our email
because there’s a crisis that just came up for our team (Okay, let’s give you
space to work through that)

There’s usually a very good reason people aren’t participating, and it’s almost
always resolvable. But you won’t know until you ask — which is just as true in a
face-to-face meeting as it is in a virtual one. We’re simply used to leaning
more on what we see than on what we hear to make that determination.

Just remember, silence can be your friend in a virtual setting. It can feel
really uncomfortable because you can’t see what people are doing, but it can be
a strong signal for change in a group that doesn’t like to speak up or
criticize. Be open and inviting so that the group feels they can trust you to
fix whatever needs to be fixed, and you’ll find that reading the virtual room
isn’t difficult, it’s just different.

Photo (woman biting pencil while sitting on chair in front of computer during
daytime) by JESHOOTS.COM on Unsplash

TELL A FRIEND:

* Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
* Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
* Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
* Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
* 1Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)1
*

LIKE THIS:

Like Loading...

5 Comments

Posted in everything

Tagged facilitation, remotecollaboration, virtualmeetings

← Older posts

* SEARCH IT!

Search for:

* RECENT ENTRIES

* How I Deal with Frustration at Work
* Review: Milanote
* Looking for the Virtual Workspace Architect’s Guide?
* Why is remote work so hard? And how can we make it easier?
* Habit Tracker: Get those new tech tools under control
* How to Get People to Speak Up in Your Remote Sessions
* A Crash Course in Translating Your Process to a Virtual Setting
* Help! They want me to do remote graphic recording next week!
* Red, Green, Blue: A Speedy Process for Sorting Brainstorm Ideas
* Reading the Virtual Room

* LINKS

Proudly powered by WordPress. Theme: Coraline by WordPress.com.
%d

digitalfacilitation.net Open in urlscan Pro 64.90.50.8 Public Scan

Form analysis 1 forms found in the DOM

GET https://digitalfacilitation.net/

Text Content

digitalfacilitation.net Open in urlscan Pro
64.90.50.8 Public Scan

Form analysis
1 forms found in the DOM