www.newadvent.org Open in urlscan Pro
2400:52e0:1e00::1079:1  Public Scan

Form analysis
1 forms found in the DOM

../utility/search.htm

<form id="searchbox_000299817191393086628:ifmbhlr-8x0" action="../utility/search.htm">
  <!-- Hidden Inputs -->
  <input type="hidden" name="safe" value="active">
  <input type="hidden" name="cx" value="000299817191393086628:ifmbhlr-8x0">
  <input type="hidden" name="cof" value="FORID:9">
  <!-- Search Box -->
  <label for="searchQuery" id="searchQueryLabel">Search:</label>
  <input id="searchQuery" name="q" type="text" size="25" aria-labelledby="searchQueryLabel">
  <!-- Submit Button -->
  <label for="submitButton" id="submitButtonLabel" class="visually-hidden">Submit Search</label>
  <input id="submitButton" type="submit" name="sa" value="Search" aria-labelledby="submitButtonLabel">
</form>

Text Content

 

Search: Submit Search



 Home   Encyclopedia   Summa   Fathers   Bible   Library 

 A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z 


Home > Catholic Encyclopedia > M > Mirabilia Urbis Romæ


MIRABILIA URBIS ROMÆ

Please help support the mission of New Advent and get the full contents of this
website as an instant download. Includes the Catholic Encyclopedia, Church
Fathers, Summa, Bible and more — all for only $19.99...

The title of a medieval Latin description of the city of Rome, dating from about
1150. Unhampered by any very accurate knowledge of the historical continuity of
the city, the unknown author has described the monuments of Rome, displaying a
considerable amount of inventive faculty. From the pontificate of Boniface VIII
(1294-1303) to that of John XXII (1316-34) it was revised and attained
unquestioned authority, despite the increase in the already large number of
misconceptions and errors. Attention was first called to these different
recensions by de Rossi in the first volume of his "Roma Sotterranea" (158 sqq.).
Almost simultaneously appeared two editions of the text, by Parthey ("Mirabilia
Romæ e codicibus Vaticanis emendata", Berlin, 1869) and by Jordan ("Topographie
der Stadt Rom im Altertum", II, Berlin, 1871, 605-43), respectively. In the
third section Jordan discusses at some length the Mirabilia and its redactions
(357 sqq.), in the fourth, the earlier divisions of the work (401 sqq.), and in
the fifth, the topography of the Mirabilia (421 sqq.), presenting most valuable
information, the result of much research on all the questions involved. The
latest edition is that of Duchesne in the "Liber Censuum de l'Église Romaine"
(I, Paris, 1905, 262-73), being the text of the original of Cencius Camerarius
with the variants of four other manuscripts. Especially valuable for a proper
conception of the Mirabilia are the 125 notes appended by Duchesne on pp.
273-83, many of them of considerable length. (The concordance with the text in
the "Excerpta politici a presbitero Benedicto compositi de ordinibus Romanis et
dignitatibus Urbis et Sacri Palatii" may be found in the "Liber Censuum", vol.
II, 91, 92, n. 5.) A critical edition of the "Mirabilia Urbis" is still lacking.
The contents of the Mirabilia fall into the following sections, the titles being
taken from the "Liber Censuum": (1) De muro urbis (concerning the wall of the
city); (2) De portis urbis (the gates of the city); (3) De miliaribus (the
milestones); (4) Nomina portarum (the names of the gates); (5) Quot porte sunt
Transtiberim (how many gates are beyond the Tiber); (6) De arcubus (the arches);
(7) De montibus (the hills); (8) De thermis (the baths); (9) De palatiis (the
palaces); (10) De theatris (the theatres); (11) De locis qui inveniuntur in
sanctorum passionibus (the places mentioned in the "passions" of the saints);
(12) De pontibus (the bridges); (13) De cimiteriis (the cemeteries); (14) De
iussione Octaviani imperatoris et responsione Sibille (the demand of the Emperor
Octavian and the Sibyl's response); (15) Quare facti sunt caballi marmorei (why
the marble horses were made); (16) De nominibus iudicum et eorum instructionibus
(the names of the judges and their instructions); (17) De columna Antonii et
Trajani (the column of Antony and Trajan); (18) Quare factus sit equus qui
dicitur Constantinus (why the horse was made, which is called of Constantine);
(19) Quare factum sit Pantheon et postmodum oratio B. (why the pantheon was
built and later oration B.); (20) Quare Octavianus vocatus sit Augustus et quare
dicatur ecclesia Sancti Petri ad vincula (Why Octavianus was called Augustus,
and why the church of St. Peter ad Vincula was so called); (21) De vaticano et
Agulio; (22) Quot sunt templa trans Tiberim (how many temples are beyond the
Tiber); (23) Predicatio sanctorum (the preaching of the saints).




SOURCES

The reader may consult in addition to the above-mentioned authors, the
Monatsberichte of the Berlin Academy (1869), 681 sqq.; GRÄSSE, Beiträge zur
Litteratur und Sage des Mittelalters; [NIBBY], Effemeridi letterarie di Roma
(1820), 63 sqq. part of this was reprinted without alteration under the title of
Mirabilia ossia le cose maravigliose di Roma (Rome, 1864). In editing the second
of the two recensions mentioned above JORDAN (II, 33, 357) calls attention to
the Sant' Isidro manuscript, in the collection of Cardinal Nicholas of Aragon
(1356-62), on which are based the Graphia aureæ urbis Romæ edited by OZANAM, and
the Chronicle of MARTINUS POLONUS. Notwithstanding the learned notes of DUCHESNE
and the comprehensive commentary of JORDAN, already referred to (in which must
be included section 3, vol. 1, pt. I, 37-74, on topographical research since the
fifteenth century), many questions concerning the text of the Mirabilia still
remain to be cleared up or are still in dispute. The authorship of the
Mirabilia, which had never been discussed by any recognized authority, is
treated in a most satisfactory manner by Duchesne in the sixth fascicule of the
Liber Censuum (97-104), which has just appeared. He adduces numerous arguments
to prove that the above-mentioned BENEDICT (Canonicus Sancti Petri de Urbe,
cantor Romanæ Ecclesiæ, the compiler of the Ordo Romanus) was also the author of
the Mirabilia, "Who, if not the indulgent author, would have wished to create a
future for it by incorporating it with the Liber Censuum?" Duchesne's theory
also explains the curious fact that the Mirabilia should be found in the Liber
Censuum, with which it is in no way connected.


ABOUT THIS PAGE

APA citation. Baumgarten, P.M. (1911). Mirabilia Urbis Romæ. In The Catholic
Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/10337a.htm

MLA citation. Baumgarten, Paul Maria. "Mirabilia Urbis Romæ." The Catholic
Encyclopedia. Vol. 10. New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1911.
<http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/10337a.htm>.

Transcription. This article was transcribed for New Advent by Gerald Rossi.

Ecclesiastical approbation. Nihil Obstat. October 1, 1911. Remy Lafort, S.T.D.,
Censor. Imprimatur. +John Cardinal Farley, Archbishop of New York.

Contact information. The editor of New Advent is Kevin Knight. My email address
is webmaster at newadvent.org. Regrettably, I can't reply to every letter, but I
greatly appreciate your feedback — especially notifications about typographical
errors and inappropriate ads.

Copyright © 2023 by New Advent LLC. Dedicated to the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

CONTACT US | ADVERTISE WITH NEW ADVENT