www.theguardian.com Open in urlscan Pro
151.101.129.111  Public Scan

Form analysis
3 forms found in the DOM

https://www.google.co.uk/search

<form action="https://www.google.co.uk/search" class="dcr-1jjnk9d"><label for="gu-search" class="dcr-0">
    <div class="dcr-6v110l">Search input </div>
  </label><input type="text" id="gu-search" aria-required="true" aria-invalid="false" aria-describedby="" required="" name="q" placeholder="Search the Guardian" data-link-name="header : search" tabindex="-1"
    class="selectableMenuItem dcr-qcy5wo"><label for="gu-search" class="dcr-0">
    <div class="dcr-6v110l">google-search </div>
    <div class="dcr-radnun"><svg width="30" viewBox="-3 -3 30 30" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" aria-hidden="true">
        <path fill-rule="evenodd" clip-rule="evenodd"
          d="M9.273 2c4.023 0 7.25 3.295 7.25 7.273a7.226 7.226 0 0 1-7.25 7.25C5.25 16.523 2 13.296 2 9.273 2 5.295 5.25 2 9.273 2m0 1.84A5.403 5.403 0 0 0 3.84 9.274c0 3 2.409 5.454 5.432 5.454 3 0 5.454-2.454 5.454-5.454 0-3.023-2.454-5.432-5.454-5.432m7.295 10.887L22 20.16 20.16 22l-5.433-5.432v-.932l.91-.909z">
        </path>
      </svg><span class="dcr-1p0hins">Search</span></div>
  </label><button type="submit" aria-live="polite" aria-label="Search with Google" data-link-name="header : search : submit" tabindex="-1" class="dcr-1gsboxi">
    <div class="src-button-space"></div><svg width="30" viewBox="-3 -3 30 30" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" aria-hidden="true">
      <path fill-rule="evenodd" clip-rule="evenodd" d="M1 12.956h18.274l-7.167 8.575.932.932L23 12.478v-.956l-9.96-9.985-.932.932 7.166 8.575H1z"></path>
    </svg>
  </button><input type="hidden" name="as_sitesearch" value="www.theguardian.com"></form>

https://www.google.co.uk/search

<form action="https://www.google.co.uk/search" class="dcr-1jjnk9d"><label for="gu-search" class="dcr-0">
    <div class="dcr-6v110l">Search input </div>
  </label><input type="text" id="gu-search" aria-required="true" aria-invalid="false" aria-describedby="" required="" name="q" placeholder="Search the Guardian" data-link-name="header : search" tabindex="-1"
    class="selectableMenuItem dcr-qcy5wo"><label for="gu-search" class="dcr-0">
    <div class="dcr-6v110l">google-search </div>
    <div class="dcr-radnun"><svg width="30" viewBox="-3 -3 30 30" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" aria-hidden="true">
        <path fill-rule="evenodd" clip-rule="evenodd"
          d="M9.273 2c4.023 0 7.25 3.295 7.25 7.273a7.226 7.226 0 0 1-7.25 7.25C5.25 16.523 2 13.296 2 9.273 2 5.295 5.25 2 9.273 2m0 1.84A5.403 5.403 0 0 0 3.84 9.274c0 3 2.409 5.454 5.432 5.454 3 0 5.454-2.454 5.454-5.454 0-3.023-2.454-5.432-5.454-5.432m7.295 10.887L22 20.16 20.16 22l-5.433-5.432v-.932l.91-.909z">
        </path>
      </svg><span class="dcr-1p0hins">Search</span></div>
  </label><button type="submit" aria-live="polite" aria-label="Search with Google" data-link-name="header : search : submit" tabindex="-1" class="dcr-1gsboxi">
    <div class="src-button-space"></div><svg width="30" viewBox="-3 -3 30 30" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" aria-hidden="true">
      <path fill-rule="evenodd" clip-rule="evenodd" d="M1 12.956h18.274l-7.167 8.575.932.932L23 12.478v-.956l-9.96-9.985-.932.932 7.166 8.575H1z"></path>
    </svg>
  </button><input type="hidden" name="as_sitesearch" value="www.theguardian.com"></form>

<form id="secure-signup-afternoon-update" class="dcr-kfi215"><label for="P0-2" class="dcr-0">
    <div class="dcr-1qn103b">Enter your email address </div>
  </label><input type="email" id="P0-2" aria-required="true" aria-invalid="false" aria-describedby="" required="" name="email" class="dcr-dpem99"><button type="submit" aria-live="polite" class="dcr-zll6x8">Sign up</button></form>

Text Content

Skip to main contentSkip to navigation
Close dialogue1/1Next imagePrevious imageToggle caption
Skip to navigation


SUPPORT THE GUARDIAN

Fund independent journalism with $15 per month
Support us

Support us
Print subscriptions
Search jobs
Sign in
Int
 * International edition
 * UK edition
 * US edition
 * Australia edition
 * Europe edition

The Guardian - Back to homeThe Guardian
 * News
 * Opinion
 * Sport
 * Culture
 * Lifestyle

Show moreHide expanded menu
 * News
   * View all News
   * World news
   * UK news
   * Climate crisis
   * Ukraine
   * Environment
   * Science
   * Global development
   * Football
   * Tech
   * Business
   * Obituaries
   
 * Opinion
   * View all Opinion
   * The Guardian view
   * Columnists
   * Cartoons
   * Opinion videos
   * Letters
   
 * Sport
   * View all Sport
   * Football
   * Cricket
   * Rugby union
   * Tennis
   * Cycling
   * F1
   * Golf
   * US sports
   
 * Culture
   * View all Culture
   * Books
   * Music
   * TV & radio
   * Art & design
   * Film
   * Games
   * Classical
   * Stage
   
 * Lifestyle
   * View all Lifestyle
   * Fashion
   * Food
   * Recipes
   * Love & sex
   * Health & fitness
   * Home & garden
   * Women
   * Men
   * Family
   * Travel
   * Money
   Search input
   google-search
   Search
   
   
    * Support us
    * Print subscriptions

 * * Search jobs
   * Holidays
   * Digital Archive
   * Guardian Licensing
   * About Us
   * The Guardian app
   * Video
   * Podcasts
   * Pictures
   * Newsletters
   * Today's paper
   * Inside the Guardian
   * The Observer
   * Guardian Weekly
   * Crosswords
   * Wordiply
   * Corrections
 * Search input
   google-search
   Search
   
   * Search jobs
   * Holidays
   * Digital Archive
   * Guardian Licensing
   * About Us

 * World
 * Europe
 * US
 * Americas
 * Asia
 * Australia
 * Middle East
 * Africa
 * Inequality
 * Global development


Police forces in Australia have fielded hundreds of complaints about misuse of
information and unauthorised access of internal police databases since 2020.
Composite: Getty Images/AAP
View image in fullscreen
Police forces in Australia have fielded hundreds of complaints about misuse of
information and unauthorised access of internal police databases since 2020.
Composite: Getty Images/AAP
Australian police and policing

This article is more than 2 months old


REVEALED: THE AMOUNT OF TIMES AUSTRALIAN POLICE HAVE ‘BREACHED THE TRUST
AFFORDED TO THEM’

This article is more than 2 months old

Advocates say complaints about unauthorised access of police databases may be
‘tip of the iceberg’ – and are particularly worried about cases involving family
violence

 * Follow our Australia news live blog for latest updates
 * Get our morning and afternoon news emails, free app or daily news podcast


Ariel Bogle and Christopher Knaus
Thu 27 Jun 2024 16.00 BSTLast modified on Fri 2 Aug 2024 01.11 BST
Share



Fran* noticed her son-in-law’s behaviour was escalating. She says he was
increasingly controlling of her daughter Sarah’s* life – monitoring her finances
and being verbally abusive.

The three were all living together and the situation felt particularly risky
because he was a police officer. He had surveillance skills and access to
information that seemed to give him a sense of power, and he held it over their
heads.



This blew up after Simon*, a family friend, started pushing back on her
son-in-law’s conduct. Simon called “a spade a spade”, Fran says, and he wouldn’t
back down.

‘It’s hard to have compassion’: can interventions change violent men’s
behaviour?
Read more

Not long after, her son-in-law called her out on to the patio, saying he “had
something to tell” her. “He sat me down [and] said, ‘I’ve investigated Simon’s
background’ … and just basically told me everything that was on the police
record.

“He told me [because] he was a cop he knew how the system worked, and he would
never get caught.”

Fran and Sarah believe that her abuser used his access to internal police
information in a bid to get Simon out of their lives. “I think it was a control
thing for him,” Sarah says. “Just to control his environment and not have
someone there who would question him and his behaviour.”

A Guardian Australia investigation has found that police forces around Australia
have fielded hundreds of complaints about misuse of information, and in
particular unauthorised access of internal police databases, since 2020.

The reasons for the complaints are not detailed in the documents released under
freedom of information laws, but advocates say they want more attention paid to
the risks of misuse – particularly in situations involving family violence.

“What we find is that if the victim-survivor has officer-involved family
violence … we’re in a different league,” says Karen Bentley, the chief executive
of Wesnet, a peak body for family violence services, because police have “access
to information that the general public don’t”.

 * Sign up for Guardian Australia’s free morning and afternoon email newsletters
   for your daily news roundup

Internal databases might include addresses, phone numbers, incident reports and
car registration details.

A 2022 Commission of Inquiry into Queensland Police Service responses to
domestic and family violence report found that access to information and weapons
meant that “when police officers perpetrate domestic and family violence, they
are particularly dangerous”.

Lauren Caulfield from Beyond Survival, who coordinates a family violence project
focused on police perpetrators in Victoria, says: “There has never been an
investigation into the scale of misuse of the database committed by officers in
cases of family violence and stalking.

“What we know is potentially the tip of the iceberg.”


COMPLAINTS AGAINST POLICE

Guardian Australia has used freedom of information laws to request the number of
complaints about unauthorised access to information by police each year since
2020.

In Queensland, police shared that there had been 547 complaints or
notifications, while in Tasmania there were 89. Neither jurisdiction shared the
outcome of those complaints.

A Tasmania police spokesperson says it adopts “a best practice approach to
information security” and points to a 2018 Tasmanian Integrity Commission report
that found its approach was “adequate and appropriate”.

In South Australia, there were 350 complaints about confidentiality of
information between 2020 and 2023, including improper access to and disclosure
of information. No further action was taken in more than half of those
complaints after an assessment by the internal investigations section.

Of the remaining complaints, according to a South Australia police spokesperson,
nine warranted charges in the police disciplinary tribunal and most others
resulted in “training, counselling or education”.

South Australia police believes its current framework “provides adequate
protection of the confidential information which it holds”.

Between January 2020 and April 2024, the Australian federal police received 22
complaints involving 32 allegations of information access or information misuse
against ACT police, of which seven were established and seven were still under
investigation.

Of these allegations, one involved a situation linked to domestic violence and
was part of an ongoing professional standards investigation.

“Information access breaches are not tolerated in the AFP,” a spokesperson says.

According to data released by New South Wales police, there have been more than
1,000 complaints about potential unlawful access and improper disclosure of
police information since 2020 – although there may be duplicates where an
incident included both allegations.

Assistant commissioner Peter Cotter, the commander of the professional standards
command, says the NSW police force acknowledges the approximately 1,000
complaints, and the number is “considered to reflect an accurate identification
of those employees who have breached the trust afforded to them”.

Cotter says NSW police have safeguards in place, including audit processes and
training. “When such matters are identified, a full and comprehensive
investigation follows … and where there are significant and severe breaches they
are investigated criminally,” he says.


TWO BROAD CATEGORIES OF MISUSE

In NSW, the internal police data system is called the Computerised Operational
Policing System, or Cops. Thirty-six officers have been charged with “accessing
or modifying data held in computer” between 2020 and March 2024.

Samantha Lee, a supervising solicitor at the Redfern Legal Centre, says the
number of complaints in NSW suggests “that unauthorised access to information is
a systemic issue that needs immediate attention from law enforcement”.

There are several cases now before the NSW courts concerning alleged misuse of
Cops, including an officer who is defending charges of domestic violence
offences and accessing or modifying restricted data. Police allege he checked
Cops to search information related to his then girlfriend and her family and
friends.

Another officer allegedly used his position to have a sexual relationship with a
woman and also allegedly used Cops to access details about other individuals,
knowing it was unauthorised.

Estelle Petrie, a lawyer with Robinson Gill Lawyers with a focus on police
misconduct, says she has seen two broad categories of misuse in her work:
officers who use these internal systems to track down people they’ve met while
working, and officers who use it as part of family violence and other offending.

“They use it as their own private library,” she says.


‘IT’S JUST DATA, “WHAT’S THE HARM?”’

Lydia Shelly, the president of the NSW Council for Civil Liberties, says she is
concerned about the lack of public information about incidents of abuse of
police data – a situation she says “erodes public confidence in the police”.

“The lack of information concerning these incidents is disturbing, given the
high numbers exposed through the FoIs, and there should be an increased level of
transparency,” she says.

skip past newsletter promotion

Sign up to Afternoon Update


Free daily newsletter

Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key stories of the day, telling
you what’s happening and why it matters

Enter your email address
Sign up
Privacy Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and
content funded by outside parties. For more information see our Privacy Policy.
We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.

after newsletter promotion

After Guardian Australia’s FoI request, the Northern Territory police said that
information about misuse of police data does not exist in “a documented format”.
Western Australia police force denied the FoI request on the basis that such
information would be held by the internal affairs unit, which is exempt from
disclosure.

However, the state’s Corruption and Crime Commission says there have been 406
allegations made against employees of WA police regarding alleged “unlawful use
of computer” from 2019-20 to date.

The WA police force has “zero tolerance of fraud, corruption or misconduct”, a
spokesperson says. “All reports of misconduct are robustly investigated and are
overseen by the CCC.”

Victoria police, meanwhile, advises that FoI requests now take on average 35
weeks to complete.

That squares with the experience of Emma*, whose partner pleaded guilty to
family violence offences in 2020. She obtained an apology from Victoria police
after her safety plans to escape interstate with her children were leaked to her
abuser and his colleagues, but says she faced delays getting her records from
police.

In Victoria, 68 police and one protective services officer were charged with
criminal and/or discipline matters relating to the misuse of police databases
between January 2020 and June 2024. Of these, three police were charged relating
to “family violence information”.

Emma now works with the Independent Collective of Survivors. One change she
pushed for was a recent change to the Victoria Police Act, which extended the
12-month limit on when an officer can be charged with misuse of the Victorian
police database, called Leap, to three years.

“Even Vicpol couldn’t tell you the extent of the problem, because they’re not
monitoring it,” Emma says. “If you are really taking misconduct seriously, if
you are taking police perpetrators seriously and stalking seriously … you put
those controls in place.”

A 2019 report from the police oversight body the Independent Broad-based
Anti-corruption Commission (Ibac), which looked at unauthorised access and
disclosure of information held by Victoria police, found it is likely
underreported. Leap administrators receive an alert if employees access records
for someone with the same surname, or if employees look up the file of someone
under investigation by another unit. Ibac said in 2019 these kinds of alerts
were “of limited use as a deterrent”.

Petrie says there still hasn’t been sufficient change within Victoria police.
“This idea that it’s just data, ‘what’s the harm?’, is influencing the way they
respond to this issue,” she says.

A Victoria police spokesperson says it is committed to meeting its FoI
obligations, and has increased the department’s resources.

It also has “stringent measures in place” to ensure the proper use of Leap,
including proactive monitoring, extensive records of who has accessed the
system, restrictions on especially sensitive information, and tiered levels of
access.

“This strong oversight means the number of Leap breaches is relatively small,
given the millions of legitimate uses every year,” the spokesperson says.


NOT JUST FAMILY VIOLENCE

The cases before the courts have heard varied reasons for access to internal
police databases.

In 2022, the police officer Jayden Faure was among the first Victorian police
officers to be sentenced in relation to Leap misuse. He pleaded guilty to
misconduct in public office after accessing the Leap database on multiple
occasions, including to look up the background of women after they approached
police for help. He was sentenced to a three-year community corrections order.

In November, the Blue Mountains officer Ricky Dean Heness, 31, pleaded guilty to
unauthorised access to restricted data after accessing the Cops database. He
looked up information multiple times about a woman he knew, according to court
documents. He told police he did it for “for personal reasons”. He was convicted
but no further penalty was imposed.

The destructive consequences of financial abuse – Full Story podcast
Read more

For those whose data has been accessed, finding out exactly what happened can be
difficult.

In 2005, Malcolm Craig was waiting in line at his local hardware store in
Alexandria, Sydney, when he says someone pushed in front of him, prompting
consternation from other shoppers. The man confronted Craig, wrongly believing
he had made derogatory remarks, and they had what a police report later called a
“verbal altercation”.

Craig walked out of the store to avoid the confrontation. The man followed him
out to where there was a woman sitting in a van nearby – the man’s partner.

He drove away. Not long after, Craig woke up and found his house damaged and
every panel of his car had been scratched. The scratches were deep, right down
to the metal, he says.

He later found out the man’s partner, the woman in the van, was a police
officer.

Worried they knew where he lived, Craig filed a complaint and requested an
internal investigation. The heavily redacted report of that investigation, seen
by Guardian Australia, found the female police officer had engaged in misconduct
by calling another officer and “requesting personal information” from Cops
linked to Craig’s number plate.

Craig hasn’t asked for much in the years since. All he wants is for the NSW
police and the state government to pay him back for the damage caused to his car
and for the stress and anxiety he suffered.

He applied for an ex gratia payment in 2019, which was declined by NSW police
because his losses were “not caused by government actions”. He then initiated
court proceedings but says he was forced to drop the case when he ran out of
money. “I’m not even asking for much,” he says. “Just pay back the damage you
did by letting out my sensitive personal information.”

Craig has also been left oblivious as to the fate of the officer. His efforts to
get answers out of NSW police and the state government have yielded little, in
his view. “They don’t give a shit, quite frankly,” Craig says.

Sarah says she tried to report her now former partner to police several times,
but claims she wasn’t taken seriously and he was never charged. “Every sort of
investigation was either abandoned or went nowhere,” she says. “They’re just a
law unto themselves.”

* Names have been changed

Do you know more? Email abogle@protonmail.com

In Australia, the national family violence counselling service is on 1800 737
732. International helplines can be found via www.befrienders.org

Explore more on these topics
 * Australian police and policing
 * Domestic violence
 * features

Share

Reuse this content


MOST VIEWED

 * LIVE
   ISRAELI WARPLANES TARGET LEBANON AS IRAN AND HEZBOLLAH THREATEN RETALIATION
   FOR DEADLY BLASTS - LIVE
   
   

 * EX-TRUMP ADVISERS HELP TO GROW PRO-RUSSIA WEBSITE THAT SPREADS MISINFORMATION
   
   

 * UNDERCOVER AS A HOTEL CLEANER IN IRELAND: ‘LIFTING THE HEAVY MATTRESS, I CRY
   TEARS OF RAGE AND EXHAUSTION’SAŠA UHLOVÁ
   
   

 * MOHAMED AL FAYED ACCUSED IN BBC DOCUMENTARY OF RAPING FIVE WOMEN
   
   
 * LIVE
   REPUBLICANS MAKE NEW PUSH FOR NEBRASKA TO CHANGE VOTING RULES TO FAVOR TRUMP
   – US POLITICS LIVE
   
   





MOST VIEWED


MOST VIEWED



 * World
 * Europe
 * US
 * Americas
 * Asia
 * Australia
 * Middle East
 * Africa
 * Inequality
 * Global development

 * News
 * Opinion
 * Sport
 * Culture
 * Lifestyle

Original reporting and incisive analysis, direct from the Guardian every morning
Sign up for our email

 * Help
 * Complaints & corrections
 * SecureDrop
 * Work for us
 *  
 * Privacy policy
 * Cookie policy
 * Terms & conditions
 * Contact us

 * All topics
 * All writers
 * Digital newspaper archive
 * Tax strategy
 * Facebook
 * YouTube
 * Instagram
 * LinkedIn
 * X
 * Newsletters

 * Advertise with us
 * Search UK jobs


Back to top
© 2024 Guardian News & Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights
reserved. (dcr)