blog.amaliadillin.com Open in urlscan Pro
2607:f8b0:4006:808::2013  Public Scan

Form analysis
0 forms found in the DOM

Text Content

Good to Begin Well, Better to End Well






PAGES

 * Home
 * Blogtacular
 * Books!
 * Orc Saga
 * Fate of the Gods
 * Postcards from Asgard
 * Son of Zeus
 * Subscribe to THE AMALIAD
 * About/Contact
 * Imaginary Friends
 * Thor in Zombie Land
 * Writing as Amalia Carosella
 * Writing as Amalia Theresa
 * Patreon


Enduring Fate, a new Fate of the Gods novella, is available now! And Concealing
Fate is also available now in ebook and paperback!
And don't forget to subscribe to THE AMALIAD, to stay up to date on Authors!me.
Or become a Patron of my work over on Patreon!




WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 23, 2009


NO-KISS FEST AND CRITIQUES


Well, the Kissing Day Blogfest was a huge success for me, personally--and it
seems like it did pretty well for everyone else, too! I'd like to take a moment
now to say welcome to all the new followers and readers! I'm grateful to have
found so many bloggers through this event.

I'll for sure be taking part in the No Kiss Fest being hosted by Frankie Writes.
And if you loved my kissing day contribution, I think you'll be equally as taken
with the almost kiss coming to you on January 2, 2010. I've already got it set
to post after the clock strikes midnight. Possibly that means I am overeager,
but I can't wait to read all the almost kisses that didn't make it into the
kissing day extravaganza. Reading everyone's contributions wasn't just fun, but
educational. I think it really helped me to identify what I felt were the most
effective devices for physical and emotional scenes like that, and hopefully
that will help to make me a better writer moving forward.

I have to say, the last couple of days have been kind of exciting for me. My
daily writing is going really well, and I can't tell you how exciting it is to
have daily feedback and critiques on these short 1000 word scenes I've been
writing. Just when I think I have a handle on things, there's something more to
be improved upon, but that's what makes it fun--the challenge of always having
something to work toward.

In my experience there's something of a process to finding critique partners. A
warming up phase, where your critiques are gentle, careful, feeling out the
responses of the writer you're working with. Mostly praise, with some
suggestions fit inside. Then as you get to know one another, and how thick your
skins are, you can start to really dig in and there's a shift toward
constructive criticism, and away from flowery and distracting or unnecessary
praise. It isn't that you don't love the praise, too, just that you know when
you get it, it's more meaningful. It means you did something really outstanding,
or accomplished something huge that you had been struggling to capture. It
becomes more personal, more reflective of your growth as a writer in style,
structure, form, and voice.

I love that shift. I love finding that place, that balance, with critique and
writing partners, where there's no compulsion anymore to be self-deprecating in
either  your critiques or the presentation of your own work. It is what it is,
unapologetic, but with the hope and confidence still that the next piece will
always be better.

This will be my last post for the holiday season, probably-- unless something
comes up and I can't contain myself. Like a compulsive Christmas Cookie Recipe
Sharing moment. Look for my next post on January 2nd, for the No Kiss Fest, and
regularly scheduled (Tuesday/Friday) posting to recommence on the 5th! I'll
certainly still be reading in the meantime.

Happy Holidays and Have a Very Fabulous New Year!

Posted by Amalia Dillin at 10:29 9 comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: writing



TUESDAY, DECEMBER 22, 2009


ENDANGERED LANGUAGES


When I tell people that I'm studying Icelandic, I get a lot of guff.
"Why?" they ask.
"Why not?" I reply.

Most often the argument I hear is that it's fairly useless. Icelandic isn't a
global language. It's relatively isolated. There are probably only a million
people in the world who speak it, probably not a lot more outside of that who
care about speaking it. But for all of that, I wouldn't call it endangered. Not
yet, anyway. Not as long as Iceland keeps its right to negotiate in Icelandic
when dealing with the rest of the Scandinavian nations, and maintains the sense
of cultural pride which has kept the language pure enough that modern Icelanders
can read the Sagas as they were written.

I've talked a little bit about my frustration that we, as a culture, seem to
feel that we have to have a reason to learn something. An excuse. We no longer
want to learn for the joy of learning. Being a "professional student" even among
people who appreciate education is still something we can't embrace-- something
we find somehow foolish. The emphasis is on what you'll accomplish with the
education. The career. The money. "What are you going to do with your degree?"
is the question students are asked again and again. If it isn't for your career,
for your professional development, there's the sense that it's a waste of money
and time.

It's a waste of money and time to learn. Ouch. No wonder we have high school
drop outs and people who don't see any reason to go to college. No wonder
Classical Studies programs are flailing about, desperate for students. And not
just Classics, but all liberal arts. Because it isn't a trade. It isn't an area
of study that lends itself directly to practical application.

What does this have to do with Icelandic? Or Endangered Languages?

Everything.

This is why people abandon the language of their small tribal community. Why
young people are letting their traditions die out, by adapting "useful" and more
common languages. Because learning their grandparents' language isn't
worthwhile. They can't DO anything with it.

What people fail to see, is that every language, every piece of information, of
shared knowledge, allows us a new worldview, a different way of seeing things.
New ways of seeing things, of doing things, are the cornerstones of innovation.
Cultural diversity NEEDS to be celebrated. Linguistic diversity is important for
mapping out those different viewpoints and understanding others. Understanding
OTHER.

It's kind of like the rainforest. Every language that goes extinct is like a
tree being cut down, and with it goes all the amazing and unknown things we
could have found living in that ecosystem. Opportunities of study, innovation,
realization are destroyed. The cure for cancer, the fountain of youth, world
peace. It's all the same. We need every tree to make it work.

A quote from the article--just some food for thought.



> Turin said he was amazed so few linguists are working on endangered languages,
> and people "do PhDs on the apostrophe in French," but no one knows precisely
> how many undocumented languages there are. When a language ceases to exist, so
> does its cultural world view, and much of the heritage of the community is
> lost.

So my challenge to you is to go out and learn something. Not because it's going
to earn you money, but because learning for the sake of learning, for the sake
of understanding, is an example we should be setting for our children. Why don't
we make an effort to make the preservation of differing world views and cultural
heritage a part of OUR culture.

I mean, Why Not?

Posted by Amalia Dillin at 09:55 22 comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: Classics, Norse, science



MONDAY, DECEMBER 21, 2009


IN HONOR OF MISTLETOE-- MY CONTRIBUTION TO THE KISSING DAY BLOGFEST.


Having to choose which kissing scene to post for the blogfest was maybe the
hardest decision I've had to make in a long time concerning my own writing. I
finally settled on this one though, because of the shorts I've been writing at
The Writer's Block. It just seemed fitting to keep the theme.

This scene isn't currently found in The Book of Generations, but only because
the book became too long and so I had to ruthlessly end it before I got here.
That was another difficult decision.



> [Excerpt Removed]


Posted by Amalia Dillin at 00:04 39 comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: blogfests, Fiction, Norse, Thor, writing



SATURDAY, DECEMBER 19, 2009


OFFICIAL KISSING DAY BLOGFEST!


I just heard about the Official Kissing Day Blogfest, via this blog and I'm all
in for Monday. Are you?

Join me in posting a kissing scene from your WIP on Monday!

Now I just have to go pick one...

Posted by Amalia Dillin at 12:35 2 comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: blogfests



FRIDAY, DECEMBER 18, 2009


THE BEST LAID PLANS...


I'm supposed to be doing revision work. Instead I'm knee deep in new material
for a story I didn't mean to start writing because of a daily writing exercise
that my brain kind of ran away with. Of course there are other mitigating
factors of a personal nature that have interfered-- cookie baking, holiday
visiting, some illness-- mostly I just haven't been able to focus for longer
than short bursts of 1000 words or so. It makes editing and revisions difficult
to accomplish, but I'm determined, and as soon as I'm back on my feet (or off
them, as the case may be), I will be getting down to business. In spite of the
holiday season!

What's funny is that the story I'm writing now--in blocks of 1000 words or so--
is part of what could be the prequel to The Book of Generations, if such a thing
existed, and I wonder if perhaps writing it isn't part of my revision process. I
wonder if writing the new story is necessary for me to move forward with the
novel itself. Maybe I need the background of that precursor sorted out in order
to better put this first book together. But that's always been the problem with
Generations, too. Deciding what information is necessary, and what isn't.

Something else that's funny to me, as I revise and reread, is that the part of
the book I like the least is the part of the book that my readers so far have
loved the most. I'm not sure what this means, or what to make of this
information, or what to do with it at all. My personal feelings about that part
of the book--a reimagining of Creation-- were mostly those of relief to be done
with it, after I finished writing. It wasn't that I felt it was poorly written,
or that the story wasn't compelling, but it felt more to me like necessary
information that had to be there, as opposed to the story I was most interested
in telling. It's the foundation for the book, without which the rest makes much
less sense, and is much less dramatic. I guess I can see how for a reader,
coming to the material for the first time, it could be exciting, but for me it
was always just background. It wasn't the point. I wonder how many other authors
encounter this?

But that's part of what I love about writing and reader response. I love getting
glimpses of the story through the eyes of my readers, and seeing what they think
is important, what they love, what they hate. Virginia Woolf says:


> ...the only meanings that are worth anything in a work of art are those the
> artist himself knows nothing about. The moment the artist tries to express his
> ideas and his emotions he misses the great thing.

In my revisions, I must be sure to keep those words in mind.

Posted by Amalia Dillin at 10:10 11 comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: revision, writing



TUESDAY, DECEMBER 15, 2009


TUESDAY RECAP--COOKIE EXTRAVAGANZA


Sorry, readers-- I'm in NY and up to my eyeballs in Christmas cookie baking.
Instead of a post about science, writing, or classical history, I can only leave
you with a list of cookies made for this holiday season.


 1.  Pumpkin Chocolate Chip (x2)
     
 2.  Chocolate Chip (x2)
     
 3.  Molasses Cookies
 4.  Italian Chocolate Nut Balls (flavored with ground clove)
     
 5.  Gingerbread
 6.  Oatmeal Lacies
 7.  Cousin Dora's Lemon Cookies (apparently a classic wedding cookie)
     
 8.  Vanilla Spritz
 9.  Italian Bar Cookies (four varieties--lemon, almond, anise, and vanilla)
 10. Grandma's Chocolate Drop (x2)
     
 11. Anisette Toast
 12. Monster Cookies

My mother will no doubt also be baking English Muffin Bread before Christmas,
but that's the easy part. We normally also make  Almond Crescents, Chocolate
Spritz, and Peanut Butter Fudge but we were a little bit short-handed this year
so some sacrifices had to be made.

I may yet develop some blisters from all the mixing.

There will be a more traditional blog post coming to you guys on Friday!

Posted by Amalia Dillin at 10:34 5 comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest




FRIDAY, DECEMBER 11, 2009


I WAS TAGGED. NOW YOU ARE TOO.


Stephanie Thornton of Hatshepshut fame tossed me a tag on this survey, and if
you're reading this, you can feel free to fill it out too... Or not. I won't
twist your arm or anything.

1. What's the last thing you wrote? What's the first thing you wrote that you
still have?
Helen is the latest thing I wrote--well, and also a 1000 word exercise on the
word Fatuous over at Penny Arcade's The Writers Block.
The first thing I wrote that I still have is probably from fourth or fifth
grade, and it's Star Wars fanfiction with the insertion of my mary-sue
telepathic alter ego. Woo!

2. Write poetry?
Not anymore.

3. Angsty poetry?
When I was in middle school. But those days are thankfully long past.

4. Favorite genre of writing?
fantasy with a splash of history.

5. Most annoying character you've ever created?
Eve's little sister, Mia, ticks me off, but at the same time she steals the
show. It's a love-hate relationship.

6. Best Plot you've ever created?
I'm pretty proud of my Helen/Theseus plot, but the best is definitely Adam and
Eve. You'll see.

7. Coolest Plot twist you've ever created?
Geez. If I could answer it without giving it all away, I would, but...

8. How often do you get writer's block?
Not so often anymore. After disciplining myself to write daily, I don't have
much trouble with it. Sometimes a scene here or there is agonizing to put down
the way I want it, but I wouldn't call it a block.

9. Write fan fiction?
When I was a kid I did, without realizing it. Then I got older and stopped. Then
I wrote it when I couldn't write anything else, but it was my secret shame. I do
engage in some star wars roleplaying though, text based, which could be
perceived as fanfiction, I suppose.

10. Do you type or write by hand?
I type for the most part, but if I'm without my laptop and struck with an idea,
or I'm sitting in the car waiting for someone I'll scribble stuff down. I don't
go anywhere without pen and paper.

11. Do you save everything you write?
Yes. It makes throwing out old notebooks a nightmare. I have stories written in
the margins of my notes for my old math classes and science classes, and I don't
want to part with them, so they're sitting in boxes.

12. Do you ever go back to an idea after you've abandoned it?
Yes. Sometimes it's actually incredibly successful, too.

13. What's your favorite thing you've ever written?
The Book of Generations story. It's heartbreaking and wonderful. But I also
really enjoyed the not-yet-of Troy letters I wrote for GeekaChicas.

14. What's everyone else's favorite story that you've written?
I've been getting rave reviews from Generations. Hope they keep up. Hope agents
feel the same.

15. Ever written romance or angsty teen drama?
When I was a teen, yes. As an adult, no.

16. What's your favorite setting for your characters?
I kind of love Asgard, as a physical setting, just because it's so rich. As a
period setting, I'm kind of obsessed with the Bronze Age.

17. How many writing projects are you working on right now?
Revising The Book of Generations (hopefully for the last time) and letting Helen
rest. But I'm prompt writing daily, if that counts.

18. Have you ever won an award for your writing?
In high school I submitted a short story to a competition and won second
place--with a prize of 250 dollars, my story published in the collection, a copy
of the book, and a plaque. Small potatoes now, but it was a big deal to me then.

19. What are your five favorite words?
I don't know. I like Latin words the most, I guess. I love the variety of
meaning, and the juxtaposition of concepts that we don't put together the same
way today. But I don't have specific favorites.

20. What character have you created that is most like yourself?
In my novels, I guess Setta, but she isn't really that much like me. She has a
lot more patience and a lot more nerve. We just both happen to love animals.

21. Where do you get ideas for your characters?
Mythology, lately.

22. Do you ever write based on your dreams?
No. But sometimes my dreams are based off my writing.

23. Do you favor happy endings?
I don't like making my characters suffer without cause, and without the hope for
redemption or peace, but generally I don't know where they're going until they
get there and I'd say that my happy endings have a good amount of dubiousness to
them. Maybe a happy for the moment, but not a happily ever after.

24. Are you concerned with spelling and grammar as you write?
Spelling absolutely. Grammar sometimes gets shafted until revisions.

25. Does music help you write?
Yup.

26. Quote something you've written. Whatever pops into your head.
hehehehe... I've been waiting for an excuse.



> She craned her neck to look up at him, over her shoulder, and tried to imagine
> him wielding a sword or a battle axe or the hammer carved into the door and
> riding to war on a chariot drawn by goats. Goats. The idea seemed ludicrous,
> comical, and she tried not to smile.
> 
> He glanced down at her, and their eyes met. His seemed to sparkle as though he
> recognized the humor. “They weren’t normal goats. Not like the goats here.
> They were…” He made a face as if he struggled to find the right word, and then
> he shrugged. “They were magic goats.”


Posted by Amalia Dillin at 10:02 8 comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: writing



TUESDAY, DECEMBER 08, 2009


HOW DO YOU READ?


When I find a book that I like, I jump into it head first. I'm voracious. I
devour it, if possible, in a single sitting. If not possible, in as few sittings
as possible. I'm distracted by the characters and their stories. I think about
them when I'm not reading, wondering what's going to happen next. It's a lot
like how I write, too. The compulsion to find out what happens keeps me moving
forward, keeps me turning or writing the pages. I read so quickly that I find
myself skipping words and description for the next line of dialogue to see what
the response is. Skimming paragraphs of scenery in favor of the next clue about
the plot.

After that first read through, if there's more books in the series, I leap into
them the same way, swallowing them whole. If there isn't more than one book in
the series, I put the book I just finished aside for a couple of days, digesting
what I read, thinking about the story, the characters, what I might have done
differently if I had written the book. But it isn't long before I pick the book
back up again and start reading it for a second time.

The second reading is much more relaxed. I take it more slowly. Reading in
shorter bursts over a much longer period of time. Maybe if I have nothing to do,
I'll read for a few hours while I'm home alone. Or if I'm busy, I'll put the
book aside for a couple of days between chapters. Where I skimmed things before,
I read more closely now, absorbing the description I was too impatient to read
the first time. Almost always there is something new in this second reading.
Something I missed in the first run through that gives the book something new. I
savor it.

If I didn't love the book the first time, sometimes it will be weeks or months
or years before I read it again, but unless I hated it, I'll always go back.
This is why I buy books, rather than getting them from the library. Because I
never know when the urge to reread is going to strike me, and I want to have the
book available at my fingertips for when it does. If I loved the book, thought
it was fantastic, I'll reread it a dozen times. Maybe even four times in the
same year. Maybe just annually. But I keep going back, exploring the characters.
Sometimes I'll go online and do searches. Google a favorite character to see
what comes up. Dig through scraps of information until I'm sure I have every
morsel.

At that point, I start reading books from the middle. Looking for a favorite
scene and then reading on from that point, getting to the end, and going back to
the beginning to read the stuff I skipped. At that point, I know the story so
well, I don't have to finish. I start and stop fitfully, skip entire chapters
just to read the pieces that I want at that particular moment. Another reason
why I have more books than I have shelves for,  I guess. Because I love them. I
love stories. I love characters that come alive, and revisiting them.

So. How do you read?

Posted by Amalia Dillin at 10:39 9 comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: writing



FRIDAY, DECEMBER 04, 2009


A TRIP TO THE MET


I spent Tuesday at The Metropolitan Museum of Art, staring at glass beads from
Mycenae and other items from the dates surrounding my Trojan War and my Helen's
life. The real reason we went was for the Art of the Samurai exhibit, for my
husband, but I can't pretend that I wasn't totally distracted by the Greco-Roman
antiquities to the point where I had no patience for the glass cases of samurai
swords.



Finding Rodin's Caryatids was a pleasant surprise, in the European Art wing. I
actually recognized it from Stranger in a Strange Land by Heinlein. Not because
I had ever actually seen the sculpture, but from his description of the work in
that book. I'm not such a fan of Rodin's Eve sculpture, however, from the Gates
of Hell. And while I took a picture of Adam for posterity, I really could have
lived without him, too.



And then there was Theseus.

I wish that I had gotten a better picture, but the only camera I had available
to me was my phone since my husband had the real one. Poor planning on my part,
I suspect, but I'll be going back for more in January, because we didn't get to
see even half of the museum in the measley four hours we had, a good quarter of
that taken up with swords that didn't even have handles attached.

But that's beside the point. The point is, I was looking at one of my favorite
paintings in all the world (Spring, by Pierre Auguste Cot) and when I turned
around, there was Theseus fighting with a centaur, and I couldn't look away.
Theseus looks quite youthful in the sculpture, but incredibly powerful in all
his heroic glory.





There are absolutely better pictures of this than mine, and I will probably
spend some time scouring the internet for them, but I can't adequately describe
what seeing this sculpture made me feel after all the research I'd done on
Theseus, and all the time I spent getting to know his character. There he was,
not even remotely in the flesh, but at least in three-dimensions, and I
understood even more fully how Helen must have felt when she met him for the
first time.


Yeah, okay, I'm a little bit of a romantic. What can I say? I'll tell you right
now that if there had been a larger than life sized classical sculpture of
Theseus in marble, I would have been beside myself. Unfortunately, I'm not sure
that a marble exists of him, though the Met has both a youthful Heracles and an
older Heracles facing eachother in the hall of statues.

I honestly hadn't been expecting to see Theseus at all, but it was an amazing
moment. Kind of like meeting an old friend unexpectedly. It seemed fitting,
somehow to run into him that way, on the first of December, as I put Helen away,
and it makes me eager to get back to that manuscript when Generations is
polished.

There's nothing like a good trip to the museum!

Posted by Amalia Dillin at 10:01 6 comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: Amalia Carosella, Classics, Theseus Should Really Have His Own Tag,
Troy, writing



TUESDAY, DECEMBER 01, 2009


NOT-YET-OF TROY SERIES LINKS


National Novel Writing Months is over, and with it also ends the awesome
Not-Yet-Of Troy series on GeekaChicas! I really enjoyed writing these letters
surrounding the events of Helen's early life, before her abduction by Theseus,
and I hope that you guys liked reading them! I may continue with the occasional
letter between characters as I write and revise, posted either on this blog, or
over on GeekaChicas.

In case you missed any, or want to take a look now that it's all over, I thought
I'd put together an ordered list of the links for your entertainment and
reference.

Helen to Pollux
Pollux to Helen
Letters from the Kings
Helen to Theseus
Theseus to Helen
Letters between Theseus and Pirithous
Letters between Helen and Meneleus
The Final Letters: Theseus to Helen and Helen to Pollux

I finished up my book with just over 87,500 words right on time yesterday
afternoon, but it's really rough, and will definitely need plenty of revision
work. Writing Helen for National Novel Writing Month was a lot of fun, but
looking back I think handling all of the Trojan War mythology in one book was
overly ambitious. This book ends with Helen's marriage to Meneleus. Happy for
him, less so for Helen, burdened with the knowledge of what's coming for her. It
would be incredibly easy to continue on with a second book about Paris, perhaps
beginning with his childhood and continuing through his kidnapping of Helen. I
might sit down and outline it into a potential trilogy for the future, if I ever
find an agent and publisher for my Non-Helen book and need to pitch something
new, but for December I'm going to be putting Troy aside!

This month I'm going to be trying to get my Non-Helen novel, The Book of
Generations, ready for querying in January. I've been revising and getting
feedback from Beta-readers as well as my workshop partner Just Another Sarah,
for the past six months, and I'm confident that I can get things finalized and
polished at last! I've already got a pretty awesome query written, and it will
be a relief to get this book out the door somewhere, God and luck willing!

Posted by Amalia Dillin at 10:03 7 comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: Classics, Fiction, Helen, Theseus Should Really Have His Own Tag, Troy,
writing



FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 27, 2009


BODY IMAGE IN LITTLE GIRLS


Body image seems like an appropriate topic to me, while I'm writing about Helen,
the most beautiful of all women in mythology. Apparently a new study shows that
an alarming number of girls between the ages of 3 and 6 are worried about being
fat-- 49% seem to worry either sometimes, or almost always.

Forty-nine percent seems like kind of an alarming statistic to me. But there's a
silver lining, I guess. Those feelings of concern about being fat, and body
image, AREN'T influenced by animated movies like Cinderella or Beauty and the
Beast, with the idealized princess beauty and the tiny waists.

So what does all this mean? I think it tells us something we are already well
aware of--children are more than capable of differentiating between real and
imaginary. They can look at animated drawings and renderings and say "that isn't
what people look like." This brings us right back to the old argument over
Barbie dolls, too. Barbie has unrealistic proportions. If Barbie were a real
person, she wouldn't be able to walk. But what if that very unrealistic image is
the reason that children have no trouble playing with those dolls? The
proportions are so obviously wrong that it divorces the doll from reality
altogether-- just like Belle's overly large eyes, tiny waist, and animation (to
say nothing of the monstrous beast she's held prisoner by) keep her from
becoming an example of what a girl should look like.

Media representation of the ideal is of course still an issue. Women who are as
thin as models make up an extraordinarily low percentage of people on the
earth-- but because we see them everywhere on television and in magazines, we're
tricked into believing that it's more "normal." The problem with models, is that
they're people. Real live, breathing people, not imaginary princesses or
obscenely busty dolls. But it isn't just the media that's perpetuating this myth
of idealized beauty and the compulsion to change to fit it. All you have to do
is walk into any woman's bathroom at home to see the cosmetics lining the
shelves, or take a walk through your favorite drug store to see all the many
products that women bring home. Adult women. Mothers of impressionable children.
And don't get me started on tanning...

We buy pounds and pounds of makeup and gallons of hair dye to make ourselves
"pretty enough." To feel better about our body image. And if you think that kids
aren't watching that, aren't witnessing that, aren't paying attention to every
comment their mother, sister, cousin, aunt, or grandmother is making about how
they don't like the way they look, or how they wish they were skinnier, then
we're deluding ourselves.

So what do I think about this body image study? And the results? I think it's
less about the cartoons and more about real life. And good body image for
children starts with Mom, and Big Sis, not with the imaginary characters in
animated cartoons, or the totally fake-looking Barbie dolls.

As for Helen, I suspect that after Leda's rape by Zeus, she heard all about the
burden of being beautiful from her mother--and how she needed to be careful not
to attract the notice of men. Helen probably wished she could do away with her
beauty altogether, to avoid the troubles that would come with it. So that
perhaps just one man would look at her as more than just a pretty face. I expect
that men wouldn't be held responsible for what her beauty drove them to.

And on that note-- a new pair of letters between Meneleus and Helen are up on
GeekaChicas for your reading pleasure!

Posted by Amalia Dillin at 10:57 5 comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: Amalia Carosella, Classics, Helen, science, Troy



WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 2009


NEW LETTERS!


Head over to GeekaChicas for the next installment of the Not-Yet-Of Troy
letters! A set between Theseus and Pirithous.

Pirithous kind of strikes me as the friend that always kind of gets you into
trouble, or comes up with the harebrained schemes and expects you to go along
with it. I think his heart was in the right place, but maybe he was kind of an
adrenaline junky, or at the least, loved to take a little bit of risk. Like, if
there wasn't some risk, or some terrible way it could go wrong, it wasn't worth
doing.

Happy day before Thanksgiving!

Posted by Amalia Dillin at 09:17 2 comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: Classics, Helen, Theseus Should Really Have His Own Tag, Troy, writing



MONDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 2009


UNSTOPPABLE BONUS CONTENT THROUGH THANKSGIVING!


I'm spending this week with my family in upstate New York, so my posts are going
to be kind of brief.

I haven't quite wrapped up Helen yet, which is driving me a little bit crazy. I
was hoping to have it finished yesterday, before I hit the road to travel, or at
worst, in the car on the way up, but it didn't happen. What I DID finish up, was
writing the letters for the Not-Yet-Of Troy series on GeekaChicas. Even though
it's Thanksgiving in the USofA, GeekaChicas is going strong all week with
Monday, Wednesday, and Friday posts of my series!

Today you can read Theseus's response to Helen. And I urge you to go check out
the previous letters if you haven't already. They're all linked to in the post
on GeekaChicas for ease of access, and each one comes with some historical
background. Or writerly background, in this case, as I discuss the challenges of
writing from the outline of a well documented myth.

On Wednesday, there will be a pair of letters between Theseus and Pirithous, and
Friday will bring a set between Helen and Meneleus. The series will wrap up on
Monday next week, the last day of November, while National Novel Writing Month
participants scrambled to get their last words in and their novel validated for
the win.. If you're waiting for the series to finish before you dive in, I'll be
recapping all the links on December 1 on this blog.


Happy Monday!

Posted by Amalia Dillin at 11:03 2 comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: Helen, Theseus Should Really Have His Own Tag, Troy, writing



FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 2009


ELEPHANT VENGEANCE


A new Not-Yet-Of Troy post is up over on GeekaChicas! A Letter from Helen to
Theseus, for your entertainment!  Now, on to the science!

This article is old, but I think striking all the same. There's a theory,
apparently, that African Elephants may be seeking revenge against humanity for
the murder of their fellows.

The thing is, it's so rare that we attribute these serious emotions to animals.
Usually we reserve that sort of thing for chimps and other great apes, alone.
Elephants are one of the  exceptions where there has been enough evidence of
seemingly bizarre and uncalled for behavior, that we look at them and actually
find ourselves wondering if they're driven by emotion more than just instinct.
There are plenty of anecdotal stories about elephants in captivity becoming
depressed and despondent when one of their "friends" is relocated to another
zoo, or elephants in circuses going on rampages against their trainer for the
abuse they've been subjected to over a lifetime. A program on the discovery
channel even went so far as to suggest that African elephants Grieve for their
dead, pausing as they journey on their annual migrations and lingering at places
where a member of the herd had died in a previous year.

Personally, I have no trouble believing that animals are experiencing emotions--
and not just the animals who show these behaviors, like elephants that seem so
human in nature. Grief. Revenge. Mourning. There's plenty of anecdotal evidence
for domestic animals too. My husband's dog, while he was in college, would often
mope around his parents' house for days after he returned to school, unwilling
to even eat. And the dog was always thrilled to see him when he arrived home
after months away. As a child I had a cat that would wait for me to walk home
from school, meeting me on the street corner at the appropriate time if she had
been let out of the house, or else sitting in the window watching me approach
the house. And I distinctly remember once my cat disappearing for three days,
but when she finally showed up at our front door again, I was given an
overwhelming impression of her own joy to see me again when she didn't even feed
herself before jumping all over my lap, demanding I pet her and sit with her.



Read more »
Posted by Amalia Dillin at 11:24 8 comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: science



TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 2009


THE ESSENTIAL THOR (NO FOOTNOTES, JUST GUT.)


I've been working with the character of Thor, the Norse god of thunder and
lightning, for years. Years of research and reading and false starts and
conversations in the dark with the ceiling that resulted in terrible stories and
drafts while I struggled to pinpoint what was there. Years of trying to
understand what was at the heart of this god, who was so loved by his people,
honored even in many ways above Odin the All-Father. Loved so much, even now,
that he was re-imagined and transported into the medium of the comic book for
the modern world. Thor, who we will soon be over-saturated by, in the quest for
world domination and movie marketing schemes. Hollywood always knows how to run
a good man into the ground. But for myself, I'm hoping they do him justice,
because after years of trying to find the answer of this god's character, this
god's essence, this god's spirit within the scraps of mythology we're given, he
became my most favorite of all mythological heroes. (Theseus may be coming in at
a close second, but don't tell Thor. He'll start going on about how Theseus is
"unworthy".)

I think that there was a very good reason that Thor was the preferred god of the
everyman, and I don't think that it was because he was stupid, or because he was
always getting into brawls and slaughtering giants, or because he was often
drunk on mead and loved to feast with the best of us. I don't even think it was
because he cross-dressed, although Mimzy tells that story better than I've ever
heard it before. I think the reason Thor was so beloved was because he always
helped his people. Thor was the god that could be depended on, no matter what
had happened, to go out and do what had to be done-- whether that was beating
down on Loki, or killing off giants, or drinking a ton of mead, or dressing up
as a woman. Thor was intensely loyal, unwavering, and good.

That's not to say he couldn't be led off track every so often. Loki makes this
perfectly clear in all the stories where they travel together to accomplish some
task, or just for the sake of getting out and about. Perhaps Thor is trusting to
a fault. Certainly he doesn't seem to take to deception very easily when he's
forced to employ its arts. He's not at all like Loki in that way. He'd much
rather bust down the door and employ a frontal assault, even if he can't win.
And that in itself is something admirable, too-- it's one of the things that I
have always respected in those people who also share that characteristic. The
people who throw their punches and then shake it off, and buy one another a
drink afterwards.



Read more »
Posted by Amalia Dillin at 10:47 7 comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: Just Gut, Loki, Norse, Thor, writing



MONDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 2009


ICELANDIC LANGUAGE DAY!


Hey, It's Icelandic Language Day! Celebrate by greeting your friends in
Icelandic!

Here's a quick lesson:
Halló!

Spread the news! Make it happen!
Learn Icelandic!

Posted by Amalia Dillin at 15:00 4 comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: Norse



SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 2009


MORE BONUS CONTENT


In case you're anxiously anticipating, the latest installment of the Not-Yet-Of
Troy series is up and awaiting your pleasure to read it! If you're not caught
up, links to the other two letters are in that post as well. I'm just that
thoughtful.

This is a pair of letters, written between Theseus, King of Athens (oh, Theseus.
What will we do with you?), and King Tyndareus of Lacedaemon/Sparta and Helen's
father.

As far as NaNoWriMo goes, I'm up to 65K, but I'm procrastinating because I know
there is no happy ending, and I just feel bad for Helen and Theseus. My goal is
to finish it up by Sunday, so it's all done before I head home for Thanksgiving
with my family, otherwise I know I'm going to be sitting around staring at my
laptop all week, cranky that people are interrupting me while I try to write.
Wish me luck!

Posted by Amalia Dillin at 21:18 4 comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: Classics, Helen, Theseus Should Really Have His Own Tag, Troy, writing



FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 2009


FICTION, FAITH, AND MYTHOLOGY


Over on Gary Corby's blog, there have been some really good posts about religion
in Classical Greece, and it's gotten me thinking again about where we draw the
line between mythology and fiction, a discussion I've been wanting to begin here
for a while.

The word Myth has some serious connotations of religious aspects, while at the
same time carrying with it the implication of fiction. When you take a minute to
consider the things we call myth, and consider to be mythology, you generally
end up looking at religious stories of now defunct, or practically dead
religions. Religions which, for one reason or another, are no longer recognized
or state-sanctioned, though at one point they may have dominated in a particular
region or area of the world. Myth is a politically correct way of calling the
stories of an entire people, an entire faith, fiction. Myth is what we say when
we're talking about gods, heroes, and faith traditions, that we have decided as
a culture, as a race, as a country, as an individual, are invalid and utter
hogwash. The things we don't believe in, but somebody else does.

Generally speaking, you don't see people going around accusing The Bible of
being mythology-- although the reality of the situation is that it isn't any
better or any worse than most of the other collections of stories and beliefs of
religions that didn't survive the spread of Christianity. I guess in some ways
the word Myth can be compared to the term Barbarian. Originally, Romans and
Greeks used the term Barbarian to describe anything Other and outside of
themselves. The Germanic tribes, for instance, were considered barbarians.
Others. A group of people culturally different from themselves. Myth is what we
call the beliefs and stories of those others in a parallel way. Our personal
beliefs are not Myth, but Truth. Everyone else on the other hand... That's
another story.

But here's the tricky part. Somewhere, somewhen, and to someone, those things we
call myths were Truth. History. Fact. They were part of reality, woven into
culture and religion and daily life. They were the real thing (whether they
actually happened or not). They were The Bible of another race, another culture,
another country, another person. So what exactly is the process which results in
turning those Truths, yes, with a capital T, into Fiction? And, can it be argued
that Fiction itself can become myth?



Read more »
Posted by Amalia Dillin at 10:21 8 comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: Amalia Carosella, Classics, Norse, writing



MONDAY, NOVEMBER 09, 2009


A NEW NOT-YET-OF TROY LETTER! ET CETERA.


Hey guys! I thought you'd be interested in getting the heads up that the next
letter in the series of Not-Yet-Of Troy posts for my book on Helen is up!

This letter is from Pollux, in response to Helen's previous warning and plea.
Pollux is Helen's brother, and is often attributed as being a son of Zeus, born
of the same Rape of Leda as Helen. Clytemnestra and Castor are usually
considered to be the full sons of Tyndareus, without the same demi-god/immortal
father aspect. I wonder if they had inferiority complexes...

The next letter will be between the Kings Tyndareus of Sparta/Lacedaemon, and
Theseus of Athens. You'll be getting two, because they're rather shorter and
much more formal in context, so keep an eye out for the link!

In other news, I just cruised by the 50K mark last night, but my goal is to
finish the book-- so I'm still going to be writing and sticking with the less
frequent posting over here for the month. Let me tell you, there will be a lot
of revision work to come when I'm done!


I'm formulating some thoughts on Mythology and what constitutes "Source" for an
upcoming post, but have been somewhat distracted by writing, and haven't put it
together coherently yet. There have been a lot of challenges with this book that
I didn't exactly anticipate, and will hopefully be able to discuss tomorrow.

Posted by Amalia Dillin at 15:23 2 comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: Classics, Helen, Troy, writing



FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 06, 2009


DELUSIONS AND HALLUCINATIONS


NaNo Stats:





31872 / 50000 words. 64% done!

I'm not sure why I've come across so much on hallucinations and delusions lately
on physorg, but I figured it was fitting to write a post up about it in honor of
all of those people taking part in National Novel Writing Month. Especially for
those who are going without sleep, and putting their mind and bodies through the
grinder to pump out that 1,667 words on top of their already overfull schedule
of working full time, parenting, and school. If you're feeling haunted by your
characters, it's okay! Even "normal" people can start hallucinating extremely
quickly, under the right circumstances!

Yesterday I linked briefly to a post discussing how children (mostly young
girls) can sublimate imaginary friends into dear diary personalities, and then
later, if they're writers, into the characters they write about (Abstract can be
found here!). Basically, writers are expected to be nagged by their creations.
Right now, I'd be more surprised if in the sleep-deprived-overly-stressed state
that NaNoWriMo can sometimes subject us to, people weren't feeling haunted by
their characters, even if it weren't relatively "normal."

The study I linked to above talks about how, placed in a sensory deprivation
room, even people who aren't necessarily prone to hallucination may begin to
experience them in as few as 15 minutes. And this is what they suspect:


> One of the researchers, psychologist Oliver Mason, said the results of the
> experiment support the idea that hallucinations are produced through what the
> scientists call faulty source monitoring: the brain misidentifies the source
> of its own thoughts as arising from outside the body.

Personally I find it kind of interesting. It's another example, I think, of
believing being more powerful than actuality. Of the brain having this
incredible power of belief over its surroundings and the body.  We know this is
true, we see it every day, but we don't really give it the research and study it
deserves, in my opinion. For example, WHY would our brains decide, in the
absence of other stimuli, to believe that our own thoughts are external? What's
the pathway that allows something like that?



Read more »
Posted by Amalia Dillin at 10:27 4 comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: science, writing



THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 05, 2009


IMAGINARY FRIENDS ARE NOT JUST FOR KIDS


If you're a writer and often find yourself talking with your characters,
reassure yourselves!

It's okay, apparently 46 out of 50 of us do it, too!

Posted by Amalia Dillin at 18:56 2 comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: science, writing



WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 04, 2009


SOME TEASER CONTENT


If you're interested, and even if you're not, I've released an original letter
from Helen to her brother Pollux, unearthed after all these millennia from my
brain, over at GeekaChicas!

These letters will be published periodically in honor of National Novel Writing
Month and my Work-In-Progress about Helen's story and the Trojan War. I'll give
you guys a post here to let you know when they go up. The next letter will be
Pollux's response to Helen's plea.

Yes, I'm absolutely aware that letter writing is, technically speaking, not
necessarily historically accurate for the time. (That was a lot of adverbs.) But
if Ovid can do it, I figure in the interest of artistic license, fudging things
a bit can't hurt.

Posted by Amalia Dillin at 10:10 2 comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: Helen, Troy, writing



TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 03, 2009


A (SLIGHTLY DISORGANIZED) TALE OF TWO FATHERS


NaNoWriMo Wordcount Update: 





15031 / 50000 words. 30% done!

Remember that show, My Two Dads?

Yeah, I don't really remember it either. But today I was surfing through
Plutarch's Theseus, skimming for reference to the Helen abduction, and, yes,
I'll admit it, reading Theseus's entry in Wikipedia, (in my defense I also read
about him in Apollodorus) and I came across some things that hadn't fully sunk
in before.

For instance: Theseus has two fathers. And he isn't the only Greek Hero
suffering from a redundancy of dads.

To understand this, maybe I need to go into the philosophy a little bit. You
see, back in the day, men in their infinite wisdom operated under the common
misconception that women really weren't more than just an oven. The sperm did
all the work of making a baby, and the wife contributed little if nothing at all
to the resulting offspring, other than providing the space for incubation. I'm
pretty sure that I read this from an excerpt attributed to Aristotle in my Women
in History course in college, but I can't promise it so don't quote me. Anyway,
semen was the provider of all...well, they didn't really consider it genetic
material then, so lets say, life-forming matter. As a result of this
understanding (Aristotle did write before Apollodorus, who is a major source for
Theseus, and certainly long before Plutarch and Ovid), if a woman had
intercourse with two men in the same day, or the same night, the child born
COULD be a mix of those two men--fathered by both.

We see the Dual-Dad syndrome in children born of the gods, pretty exclusively as
far as I know, which is convenient because it relieves them of the burden of
being illegitimate heirs. I have to admit, I'm not exactly sure what the lot of
an illegitimate child was, but the fact that the children are labeled as such in
works like The Iliad leads me to believe that they were probably not given the
privileges of their legitimate brothers and sisters. Certainly Hera had no love
for Zeus's bastard children, and legitimacy seems at the very least to be
required of one who will inherit any kind of land, wealth, or kingdom.



Read more »
Posted by Amalia Dillin at 10:38 No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: Amalia Carosella, Classics, Theseus Should Really Have His Own Tag, Troy



FRIDAY, OCTOBER 30, 2009


PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENTS!


We interrupt our regularly scheduled blog posting for these announcements!

We're moving into National Novel Writing Month, and I'm sorry to say this may
result in a cut back on my posting habits on this blog. We'll see how things go
once the month gets started, and I get a handle on the new book, but I'm
planning right now to go with a Tuesday/Friday posting schedule for the month of
November. If I happen to have more time, you'll see more of me here, but you can
definitely count on me for twice-weekly posting on those days. I hope you will
all still follow along with me!

For those of you interested, I'm happy to announce that I'm now a contributing
writer for GeekaChicas! I don't have any posts up yet My first post went up
today, and there will probably be some cross-posting going on between here and
there, but I'm pretty excited to be asked to write for and with the other women
who make that blog great! I hope you'll all check it out.



Read more »
Posted by Amalia Dillin at 11:09 2 comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: writing



THURSDAY, OCTOBER 29, 2009


BACK TO SCIENCE! SUPERBRAINPOWER-PALOOZA


So maybe this statement is going to sound obvious, but research apparently shows
that phantom limbs don't HAVE to obey the laws of physics.

Yeah, when I put it that way it doesn't sound that spectacular, but think about
what this means for people who are bound by those same phantom limbs, and the
pain induced by them. They don't have to hurt. They can will themselves not to
be in pain. They can will the phantom limb into a different and impossible
position to make it stop acting up.

So maybe this still seems like common sense to you. But the article takes it a
step further. This isn't just about phantom limbs, this is about body image. The
way we imagine and see ourselves. The way we THINK our  bodies. The study shows
that simply by practicing imagining the body in a different way, our brain
essentially believes it to be come so. For people suffering from diseases which
stem from poor body image-- like anorexia, as the article mentions-- this could
be a huge break through. This is proof that if they close their eyes and
practice imagining that their body image is something different, their ideal of
beauty, perhaps, that they can, essentially, program their brain to BELIEVE it's
the truth.

Proving once again that funny trope that keeps popping up in everything--Belief
is power.

When I read the title of the article though, I was really hoping that they were
going to talk about how Phantom Limbs could actually physically pick stuff up or
something. I guess that's the science fiction geek in me...

Posted by Amalia Dillin at 10:38 6 comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: science



WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 28, 2009


IS ALL MYTHOLOGY CREATED EQUAL?


Take a moment and put aside right and wrong, and truth with a capital T, and
just hear me out.

Maybe the better question is this: Does all mythology come from one source? One
missing link? And is everything else just variations on those same themes? Is
that missing link something embedded in our consciousness? Is religion, like
some evolutionary theorists suggest, an impulse which we bred into ourselves,
therefore making mythology some instinct, some bizarre shared memory with shared
meaning, so that the ideas, tropes, stories contain that same thread, no matter
where on earth it's found?

Or is it as simple as this: the culture and supposed religion of a megalith
people. (And regardless of the title of Wikipedia's entry, this culture
stretched all the way to the far east--though there is a bizarre gap in the
middle.)


Read more »
Posted by Amalia Dillin at 10:00 No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: Amalia Carosella, Classics



TUESDAY, OCTOBER 27, 2009


HOLDING BACK


I've been holding off on starting my next book for two reasons. 1) I needed to
do research, and 2) I want to participate in National Novel Writing Month.

The idea came to me a couple of weeks ago though, and ever since it's been
clawing at the back of my mind. It wants to be written, and it is causing me
sleepless nights to keep it contained. To wait to write it. I hate this feeling
of fighting against it. Every time I read a new primary source on the Trojan
War, or pick up The Iliad, I want to start writing immediately. And boy, do I
wish that I could read and write simultaneously! Four arms and two sets of eyes,
and one mega-brain that can absorb all that input and turn it immediately into
creative output.

The thing is, it's kind of an exercise of discipline at this point. A discipline
that will be important to my future career as a writer, because there are going
to be times when I need to focus on revisions or editing, and I can't move
forward immediately into the next project. And I need to know if holding back
until the right time is good or bad for my creative process. If I CAN do it,
without messing myself up. When I finally unleash all this creative purpose,
this story, will it be better for my having waited to get the facts, or worse?
Will I write better? Or will my brain be fogged and overrun by all the ideas to
the point where organizing them into coherent sentences and chapters is
impossible?



Read more »
Posted by Amalia Dillin at 11:11 No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: Troy, writing



MONDAY, OCTOBER 26, 2009


BETA FOR THE WIN, AND WHAT I LOVE ABOUT WRITING


I just got back a copy of my manuscript all marked up in red ink from one of my
readers. There is nothing better than sitting down with a copy of my book and
seeing all the comments right next to the words and all over the margins. It
gets me excited to do revisions, and address those instances where my beta
reader wanted more, and I can see why.

I love especially comments that make me see things in a way I hadn't before. A
new interpretation of a line that I took for granted that adds depth or meaning.
A different perspective on the motivation of a character. I remember once
sending a short story out to a reader and having them come back with a response
that was completely accurate, but horribly different than the impression I
wanted to leave them with. But I loved that element too-- I loved that they saw
that emotion, that motivation, that I had missed.



Read more »
Posted by Amalia Dillin at 11:18 No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: writing



SATURDAY, OCTOBER 24, 2009


RESEARCH-PALOOZA


I had a terrible and awesome realization yesterday. My time is running out to
finish my research, and the research I need to do just exploded.

I had been concentrating entirely on the myths surrounding the Trojan War, with
a few forrays into anthropology of the Bronze Age . But it occurred to me today
(somewhat belatedly) that part of my story will take place in Egypt. And I have
not done any research at all into that country during and surrounding the Trojan
War.

Ouch.

As a result, my weekend is going to be taken up with power reading and power
researching. And again, I'm grateful that my husband is even more interested in
history than I am, and has about thirty history books I can sift through for
information. From Atlas's of Archaeology to Encylcopedias of Mythology and,
perhaps more importantly for my belated realization, a brand new Encylopedia of
Ancient Egypt. Let me assure you that my nose will be stuck in that book for the
next two days.

All that said, I'm sure you will understand when I tell you I won't be posting
anything on this blog on Sunday. I'll be too busy ruining my eyes by reading
non-stop, probably in less than ideal lighting, and certainly there is bound to
be some small-eye-strain-inducing-print.

Any valuable links to information on Egypt between 1210 and 1170 BCE would be
greatly appreciated, if you happen to have them lying around.  Otherwise, you'll
hear from me Monday.

Assuming I still have my wits after my intended information overload.

Posted by Amalia Dillin at 10:29 No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: Troy, writing



FRIDAY, OCTOBER 23, 2009


WHY MY TEXTBOOK ON MYTHOLOGY IS TRASH


I'm going to make a shocking admission, and I apologize if you feel betrayed,
but the truth must come out.

In college, I never took a class on Classical Mythology.

In my defense, I did make the attempt. I registered, bought the book, and even
attended a few classes. Unfortunately I found out very quickly that I wasn't
going to learn well in the course. There were a number of reasons I felt this
way that I won't get into here, but the fact is, I dropped the course and didn't
look back.

Shame on me.

That being said, I kept the book. Because what classics major can't use another
text book on Classical Mythology? Who could say no to keeping a copy of
Classical Mythology, Seventh Edition, by Mark P.O. Morford and Robert J.
Lenardon? Or maybe I had already unwrapped the plastic from the book and it was
too far into the semester to return it--I don't remember. But I put it on a
shelf and have been carrying it around with me as baggage ever since.


Read more »
Posted by Amalia Dillin at 10:54 8 comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: Classics, Troy



THURSDAY, OCTOBER 22, 2009


SOME (DISORGANIZED?) THOUGHTS ON THE CYPRIA FRAGMENTS.


I hadn't intended on reading The Cypria Fragments, but while perusing the
wikipedia article on Helen of Troy, there was a reference to it that intrigued
me. Namely, the comment that the marriage of Helen to Meneleus heralded the
beginning of the end of the age of heroes, and Zeus intended to destroy men and
in particular, the heroes among them through the Trojan War. I have to add, too,
that the phrasing was very Tolkien-esque, in the article. Anyway, this motive
for the Trojan War as a way to destroy man wasn't something I had heard of
before and in light of the archaeological evidence of Mycenae's inexplicable
destruction following the epic, it seems quite meaningful. So I followed the
reference to its source in the Cypria and dug in.

So far, I haven't found anything specific to that particular reference, but I
have found what seems to me to be an event not dissimilar to Abraham's sacrifice
of his son Isaac in the old testament. Agamemnon offends Artemis, and in order
to restore himself and his expedition to her favor, he offers his daughter,
Iphigeneia as a sacrifice to the goddess. At the last moment, Artemis stops him
by removing Iphigeneia and replacing her with a stag instead for the sacrifice.
In the old testament, the angel of God stops Abraham from sacrificing Isaac at
the last minute, and a ram is discovered nearby to replace his son as the
sacrifice. Of course, Isaac wasn't swept away and made immortal, but the trope
is still there. Willingness to sacrifice one's own blood without hesitation is
more important than the sacrifice itself. I can only imagine the emotional
scarring that Isaac and Iphigeneia might have ended up with, at finding
themselves on the wrong side of the altar. I bet they would have got on famously
if they had ever met.


Read more »
Posted by Amalia Dillin at 10:45 No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: Amalia Carosella, Classics, Norse, Troy, Zeus



WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 21, 2009


ON APOLLODORUS'S THE LIBRARY AND FAIRY TALES


So I'm reading  The Libraries by Apollodorus, as the Epitome deals with the
Trojan war, and those events which lead up to it, and I came across this in the
notes:



> The story ran that all the gods and goddesses, except Strife, were invited to
> attend the marriage of Peleus and Thetis, and that Strife, out of spite at
> being overlooked, threw among the wedding guests a golden apple inscribed with
> the words, “Let the fair one take it,” or “The apple for the fair.” Three
> goddesses, Hera, Athena, and Aphrodite, contended for this prize of beauty,
> and Zeus referred the disputants to the judgment of Paris.

And all of a sudden, I had an ah HA! moment.

Are we looking at the origin of the evil fairy of folklore? The same fairy who
becomes Malificent in Disney's version of Sleeping Beauty? The fairy, who
overlooked, curses the baby, rather than blessing it? (Something about 12 golden
plates, and 13 fairies, wasn't it? It's been a long time since I read my
complete Grimm's fairy tales.) And the origin of the evil step-mother we all
know from Snow White, with Paris playing the roll of the magic mirror? This does
seem to capture interesting elements from both, and I think I can confidently
say that these stories pre-date the Germanic folklore which is the source for so
much of the old fairy tales.

I knew the story, but I had never seen it put exactly in those terms. Now that I
have, I find it difficult to believe it ISN'T the story which resulted in those
other interpretations. Very interesting.



Read more »
Posted by Amalia Dillin at 10:15 2 comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: Amalia Carosella, Aphrodite, Classics, Helen, Paris, Troy, writing



TUESDAY, OCTOBER 20, 2009


THE HEROIDES


For those of you following my journey through Trojan myth, or with any kind of
passing interest, I highly recommend you check out Ovid's The Heroides. You
don't even have to read the whole of it-- each letter is labeled with the writer
and the intended recipient. There are three which I've focused on, personally,
in regard to Helen and Paris, V, XVI, and XVII. (There are a couple more dealing
with different characters from the war--Achilles, Agamemnon, and children of
these--but I'm running short on time to read all this stuff, so I haven't looked
at them yet.)

The fifth letter is written by Oenone to Paris. Oenone, according to Ovid, is
Paris's first wife. She was a nymph, and he left her behind in Troy to go after
Helen. She appears to have written this letter after his return, when he brings
Helen with him to replace her as his wife. Oenone is understandably pretty upset
about all of this. She was Paris's wife, after all, before he was recognized as
one of Priam's sons, and was just some poor shepherd in the woods. She warns him
that Helen is going to bring his ruin, and that as an adulteress, he can't trust
her. I can only imagine that Paris ignores all of this. It's unclear to me
whether Oenone is kept on as a second, lesser wife of Paris's, or whether she's
cast out. I don't know if she's living in the palace with them or not--I think
I'll have to read through it again. But until I had read this, I wasn't aware
that Paris had been previously married, and that element will be an excellent
and interesting thing to explore, certainly, as I write.

The sixteenth and seventeenth letters, are part of what is referred to as the
double letters. These were letters paired with their responses. The first is
from Paris to Helen, begging her to consider his suit for her hand, and his
love, and the second is Helen's response. Paris tells Helen the story of the
three goddesses, Hera/Juno, Athena/Minerva and Aphrodite/Venus, who appear to
him after Hermes/Mercury drops him the golden prize and orders him under
Zeus/Jupiter's command to settle the issue of who is the fairest. Each of the
goddesses offers Paris a prize if he chooses them. Aphrodite offers him Helen,
and that's when his obsession with her is born. It's also the source for the
enmity Hera and Athena have for Troy in The Iliad. They seek Troy's destruction
because Paris chose Aphrodite over them.


Read more »
Posted by Amalia Dillin at 10:51 2 comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: Amalia Carosella, Classics, Helen, Paris, Theseus Should Really Have His
Own Tag, Troy, writing



MONDAY, OCTOBER 19, 2009


WHY SUPERMAN IS AWESOME REGARDLESS OF HIS PERFECTION.


It's been a while since I've gone comic book on you guys, but I've been thinking
about this off and on, whenever Superman has come up in various conversations,
and I think I can stretch the truth a little bit and pretend this is a
conversation about character in writing, because honestly, knowing what makes a
character compelling to an audience is kind of the trick, isn't it? Not to
mention the fact that comic books and modern superheros, it can be argued, are
our way of reinterpreting and reinventing the heroes and gods of those old myths
and pantheons. (Why is it, every time I start talking about comic books, my
sentences become astonishingly long?)

Most people know Superman. I want to say everyone knows Superman, but I have to
take into account that perhaps Superman is not quite so prevalent among other
cultures as he is in the United States. After all, he traditionally does stand
for Truth, Justice, and the American Way, whatever the heck that means. But the
thing that always seems to come up in conversations about Superman, is the fact
that he is TOO perfect a hero. This perfection seems to make him unrelatable, to
some people. It rubs them the wrong way. Superman can do everything, and
everything he does is always The Right Thing To Do. Personally, this doesn't
bother me at all, but maybe I read a little bit more into his character, or
maybe I'm just an idealist. Possibly both. Either way, allow me to makes some
arguments for what makes Superman an awesome character.

1) Superman Struggles.
Maybe he always ends up making the right choice, but man, he doesn't always have
an easy time figuring out what it is. Again and again we see Superman returning
to his human parents (Ma and Pa Kent) and asking for help. Superman, who is
essentially a god in his own right, looks to these humans for moral guidance and
counts on these two people to tell him when he's going too far, or making a
wrong decision. He doesn't go it alone. That's kind of the appeal of Jimmy Olson
and Lois Lane, too. Superman needs them. Superman needs the connection to
humanity that they provide him. He needs their support, their love, their
reassurances. And as someone unique to the world, he needs their acceptance.



Read more »
Posted by Amalia Dillin at 10:38 2 comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: Classics, writing



SUNDAY, OCTOBER 18, 2009


VACATION!


No exciting science or history post today, since we're off visiting with the
family. I'll be back to my somewhat regularly scheduled posting on Tuesday
Monday. I promise to come up with something interesting!

Posted by Amalia Dillin at 11:50 No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest




SATURDAY, OCTOBER 17, 2009


FOOD AND WATER AS PAIN RELIEVER?


Apparently, for rats, food and water acts almost like a drug, and the act of
eating or drinking can grant them a higher tolerance to pain (and it's supposed,
other externals not yet tested for).

The implications of this are huge. The article touches on what this probably
means for people, and goes a long way toward explaining the problems some people
have with eating until whatever is in front of them is finished. Our compulsion
to overeat. (You know, like that bag of chips you sat down with in front of the
television, and now it's gone? Or that carton of ice cream you JUST opened, but
somehow is already half gone?) But, if it's also true that just plain water
accomplishes the same state of higher tolerance to pain+ (Yes, pain+, no that is
not a typo) then it could also mean we can take extra unnecessary sugar out of
our habits, replace it with water, and have the same result. The article talks
about substituting lollipops at the doctor's office with a cup of water instead,
for kids.



Read more »
Posted by Amalia Dillin at 10:38 4 comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: science



FRIDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2009


CONJECTURE AND FRUSTRATIONS FROM THE ILIAD


One of the things I find incredibly frustrating when reading through Homer's
Iliad is the alarming number of characters, and the excessive ongoing
genealogies. There are so many people who are mentioned, along with their entire
history of breeding, only so that their death can be cataloged as someone's
(with an equally irritatingly elaborated upon list of forefathers) kill. Achaean
and Trojan alike. It almost gets to the point where I lose track of the thread
of action, and forget what's going on, and certainly all the Greek names jumble
together.

Homer definitely pays no attention to the difficulty one might have in following
his players. While I recognize that in part this is a function of the formula
and oral tradition of the poetry, I also want to curse him for naming (for
example--one of many) Agamemnon at least three different ways. He's referred to,
sometimes in the same stanza, sometimes in several different ones, as Agamemnon,
Atrides, and Son of Atreus, which in and of itself would not be problematic to
follow, if there weren't eighty other men, far less important, being named with
the same level of variance throughout the book.



Read more »
Posted by Amalia Dillin at 10:45 No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: Amalia Carosella, Classics, Troy



THURSDAY, OCTOBER 15, 2009


THE UNCANNY VALLEY AND MONKEYS!


I had never heard of the Uncanny Valley phenomenon until reading this article
today, but now that I have, I'm kind of fascinated by it, and really interested
in this research, especially as it applies to non-human animals.

Basically, the article tells us that monkeys respond to realistic and artificial
images of monkeys with fear. Apparently this behavior has been seen in humans
too. That when we look at realistic but artificial human faces--human but not
quite human--we're disturbed by them, and respond with revulsion. Mostly this is
applied to (or observed with) computer generated lifelike images (like
characters in movies such as Polar Express and that newfangled Beowulf) and
robotics.

I'm wondering if this applies to Wax Museum figures, and paintings that are so
realistic they seem to stare at us, as well as just computer generated figures.
I know that I can't stand wax museums, they creep me out. I don't necessarily
have the same response to paintings though. I find realistic, almost
photographical (did I make that word up?) paintings kind of fascinating to look
at, and don't have any revulsion for them, but rather an admiration for the
artist. Perhaps because they're static and only two dimensional, whereas wax
figures are three dimensional and more lifelike? Too lifelike?

Anyway, apparently this is the first time this reaction has been observed in any
other animal besides humans, and the most interesting part is, we have NO IDEA
why we (or they) respond this way. I mean, there are theories listed within that
wikipedia article that I linked to above, like, that the human but not quite
human passive face reminds us of death and the innate fear of death we all have,
and the fact that it may be conceived as a threat to our human identity, but we
don't KNOW for sure what the imperative is.



Read more »
Posted by Amalia Dillin at 10:45 3 comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: science



TUESDAY, OCTOBER 13, 2009


SO WHAT I TOLD YOU IS TRUE, FROM A CERTAIN POINT OF VIEW...


My leading lady spends quite a bit of time in Greece. Mostly because this is an
area of history which I'm familiar with, and for a variety of other factors that
I won't get into now. The trouble is, for a woman, Greece was not a very
exciting place to live. Especially if one has an awareness of how else one could
be living, which my leading lady, and my gentle readers, both do. So instead of
taking my readers through Greece from the point of view of my leading lady (from
whom they would only see the interior of her home for the most part, long days
of overseeing the slaves taking care of the weaving, while her husband absents
himself to do whatever it is he does), we see it instead from the point of view
of a god. A god, in fact, who does not lord over Greece at all.

I brushed on this a little bit in this post, where I talked about how the
clothing my god was wearing was less important than the things he was saying and
his enormity of size, when my leading lady finally meets him. An understanding
of what your characters care about and would notice is important, especially
when you're writing third person limited or first person. They can't see
everything. They won't see everything. They won't CARE about detailing their own
living space.



Read more »
Posted by Amalia Dillin at 11:56 2 comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: Classics, writing



MONDAY, OCTOBER 12, 2009


THE PITFALLS OF ELECTRONICS.


Monday morning I woke up to find that my modem had kicked the bucket overnight.
Sometime after I went to bed, it just quit. Unfortunately this meant that I was
compelled to call the customer service department of my internet service
provider.

I can't be the only one who hates those menus.

Long story short, a trip to two different stores, and a significant sum of money
later, I'm once again connected to the world wide web, and am now free to look
up everything I ever wanted to know about weaving and free standing looms, old
world-style. This is only partly because my leading lady spends a significant
portion of her time in front of a loom, weaving clothing for her family through
the centuries. You may expect a post reflecting said research in the near
future.

Posted by Amalia Dillin at 20:36 2 comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest




SUNDAY, OCTOBER 11, 2009


THE MYSTERY OF THE NORSE MYTHOS


One of the things I love about Norse Mythology, is that it's so piecemeal. That
seems kind of a weird thing to say, but just stay with me for a minute.

What we have of Norse Mythology are remnants passed down through oral tradition,
and not put down on paper until after 1100AD (as late as 1200-1300 in some
cases), in the Eddas and sagas. I'm sure you've heard me talk about this before,
but it bears repeating. We have no written record before this time, and the
dates are not exactly during the Viking glory days, but more toward the end of
the era. These facts were not the only serious factors which influenced these
sagas and stories about the gods as they were finally written.

For starters, one of our greatest sources for Norse Mythology was written by
Snorri Sturluson (around 1200 AD). He's attributed with writing the Prose Edda
which contains a very coherent account of the Norse gods, the creation of
the(ir) world, and its destruction. But Snorri himself is clearly looking at the
stories of the gods which he's transcribing as MYTHS surrounding actual men who
may have lived, not as truths of living gods. Not to say that he was wrong, but
this context is certainly something that should be taken into account when
reading. Snorri's Christian viewpoint may certainly have corrupted the stories,
even if the fact that he was writing about them on the way out, didn't.



Read more »
Posted by Amalia Dillin at 11:04 No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: Classics, Norse, Thor



SATURDAY, OCTOBER 10, 2009


ANCIENT HISTORY AND MODERN POLITICS


This is more of a book review than a scientific article, which is kind of odd
for physorg, from my experience, but it still captured my attention. The book
looks fascinating and I might have to pick it up. The article/review of the book
makes some fascinating points and suggestions about how the conditions which led
to the fall of democracy in Athens are disturbingly similar to the issues we
face today. But let me start by saying this is not new information at all.
Classicists have been seeing parallels between the fall of those ancient powers
and modern ones for years. This guy, maybe, is the first one to get publicity
for his book, but that's about as new as his information gets. Even
non-classicists are aware of it. My social studies teacher in the ninth grade
had no qualms about declaring the USA as the newest Roman Empire, on the edge of
collapse, and let me tell you that the unit on the classical world was NOT big,
even then.

The thing is, we know that history is important. We know that paying attention
to history is the best way not to repeat mistakes. This is why there's such a
huge emphasis on World War II. So that it won't be forgotten. So that the
nightmare atrocities of that war will not be forgotten, and as such, committed
again. We know it, but we're so caught up in more modern history, that we, as a
culture, have glossed over our beginnings. Classical history is often ignored,
like this article says, and in my opinion we're doing ourselves a huge
disservice by it for the exact reason this book was written. Athens was facing
the same issues we are, and their government fell. Democracy fell. It would be
wise of us to take a look and see why so that we can try to avoid following in
its footsteps. So that we can choose a different path for our nation which does
not repeat the errors of history.



Read more »
Posted by Amalia Dillin at 11:11 No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: Amalia Carosella, Classics



FRIDAY, OCTOBER 09, 2009


CLOTHING AND APPAREL, FOR THE GODS


How do you dress a god, in the modern day, while keeping the richness of his or
her heritage intact, and without making them look completely ludicrous?

Does a god wear jeans and t-shirts? Or, does a god stick to what he knows, and
continue wearing the clothing of his glory days long past their expiration date?
How do you dress a god in such a way that a reader (or viewer) will recognize
them as more than mortal, or not quite human, but it won't tip off the rest of
the characters?


Read more »
Posted by Amalia Dillin at 12:48 No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: Norse, writing



THURSDAY, OCTOBER 08, 2009


THE NORDIC BRONZE AGE


One of the most critical plot points in my book occurs right smack in the middle
of the Nordic Bronze Age. That was the period between, oh, 1600 BCE and 600 BCE,
roughly--those dates are subject to change depending on what text book you're
reading. Okay, so maybe not the middle. It's about 980 or so. Anyway, the result
of all this is that I've had to do a lot of investigation and research.

Unlike other periods in history, we really don't know a lot about the Bronze Age
in Scandinavia. We know that the weather was much warmer--think modern day
Northern France, they were even growing grapes-- and they participated in trade
with the rest of Europe. There's even evidence/supposition of contact between
Scandinavia and Crete. But most of our information comes from burial sites and
stone paintings. There was no written language, and most of what we know of
Scandinavian culture came from the Eddas which weren't recorded until much, much
later. (~1000 AD--I mean, CE. That's the politically correct term now, right?)

Basically the scarcity of information leaves me with a number of challenges.

1) As far as clothing and dress go, we basically only know what people were
buried in. And we don't even really know who the buried people ARE. Nobility?
Priests and Priestesses? Personally, I find myself wondering if the people being
buried were done so in their Sunday's finest, not unlike we do now. If that's
the case, then it tells us practically nothing at all about the day to day
regular Joes. Or maybe I should call them Svens? If my leading lady is the
daughter of a village leader, is that noble enough to merit burial? Noble enough
to mean that she had finely woven hair nets and belts? Did she have jewelry? Or
was she still wearing furs? The nobles had woven wool clothing, for sure. Did
the non-nobles? I don't even want to call them peasants, and nobles, to be
honest, because we're not even clear on the social stratification.

2) Day to day life is even more of a mystery. They had agriculture for sure.
Like I said above, they were growing grapes and making wine. But how much impact
did the amber trade have on economics for villages? How dependent were these
people on coastal fishing? We know that later on, Vikings are notorious
seafarers. But what were they then? If they had contact with the south, and even
Crete, is it reasonable to assume that they had some knowledge of boat building
greater than hallowed out logs for canoes? Egypt certainly had no trouble
building immense barges around the same time. Certainly the people of archaic
Greece weren't slackers when it came to boat building, either. The technology
existed. But even with trade, did it make it that far north? Were villages
conquering one another? Fighting? Was Tribalism an issue? How was leadership
decided?

3) What about the gods we all know and love? Or at least the gods that I know
and love, I don't know how you feel about them. There's evidence from the
pictures that the symbols later used by Odin, Thor, and Freyr, as well as Freyja
were present. But the first written acknowledgment of the Norse Gods we know
from the Eddas wasn't until Tacitus, who wrote around 100 AD/CE. While it's
completely possible, and even likely, that the gods of the Vikings had their
roots in the Bronze age, we don't have a lot of evidence one way or another to
support it. Could I make the assumption? Sure. Would I prefer to have some
actual research and information to back it up? Definitely.

Now, the good thing about the lack of information, is that I can make some
informed guesses and make stuff up to my heart's content. But while I know my
classical history better than most people, I'm a little weak with this Bronze
Age business.

It's a good thing I have a lot of books.

Posted by Amalia Dillin at 20:12 2 comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: Norse



WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 07, 2009


ANSWERING LIFE'S CHILDHOOD QUESTIONS THROUGH WRITING


J.R.R. Tolkien had a vision for his work which went beyond simply telling a good
story set within a vivid world, similar but unlike our own. He wanted more than
anything to create a national mythology for his country. He wanted Britain to
have gods and heroes greater than mere mortals, but still relatable and flawed.
(Really. I took a class on Tolkien. I'm not making this stuff up!) To that end,
he drew on the culture of his own country and the myths and legends of other
nations that he found admirable to create a unique world. It goes without saying
that this was the birth of The Lord of the Rings.

As a child I always wondered what to make of the many pantheons, the many myths,
the many creations of the world. I always struggled to somehow fit them all
together into one universe, one faith. I remember once asking my mother if the
other gods, Zeus, Thor, Amun-Ra, Shiva, were the extended family of God. His
cousins and aunts and uncles, his brothers and sisters, his nieces and nephews.
Could they all be related? Family? Friends?

Though my mother was quick to dissuade me, the idea never left my mind
completely. Despite my Christian upbringing, I still wanted to find a way to
make it all fit together. Not unlike Mr. Tolkien, I wanted to create a new
mythology. This was God’s world, but I wanted to find a way to let the other
gods live in it. I wanted to blend the existing myths and legends, gods and
heroes, into one big family.

My journey to this end began with The Book of Genesis, and Adam and Eve. It was
fueled by classes in Norse Mythology and Classical History.

I'll tell you this--but the rest you'll have to read in the book that I ended up
writing-- the other gods are NOT God's extended and dysfunctional family. But it
was a fun idea when I was a kid. I like the answer I discovered through writing
my book better though, anyway, now that I'm an adult.


Posted by Amalia Dillin at 12:07 No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: Classics, Norse, writing



TUESDAY, OCTOBER 06, 2009


MORE LANGUAGE FUN


I was always jealous of schools that offered foreign languages to younger
students. In my school, growing up, foreign language classes didn't begin until
seventh grade. But I was well aware of the fact that supposedly, the younger you
are, the easier it is to learn a new language. I always wondered why we weren't
starting these classes in elementary school. Just because you're too young to
make a choice between them? I don't know.

But anyway, apparently Use it or Lose it is NOT a correct statement to make
about languages. And apparently, also, once a second language is learned and
practiced (laid down a new map over our brain when you become bilingual), we
don't shut it off.

I have always wanted to learn to master a new language. I've been fascinated by
it for an excessively long time. Long enough to learn one-- but I never did. I
took Spanish from seventh to tenth grade, but then I dropped it in favor of
study halls (I know, shame on me!) and when I got to college and actually wanted
to learn again, I chose Latin for the reasons already mentioned in this post.
Though they were both romance languages, it fractured my language education.


Read more »
Posted by Amalia Dillin at 13:14 3 comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: science



SUNDAY, OCTOBER 04, 2009


RANDOM LANGUAGE LEARNING!


Keeping in the spirit of my previous post on furthering education, I was
researching programs and came across a completely free course of study in
Icelandic through the University of Wisconsin and put together by the University
of Iceland!

I've signed up with A couple of my friends, including SQRT(D) (because learning
a language is always better with a buddy!) and I encourage any of you with
interest to join us! If you have a background in German, you should be pretty
well off--my husband was able to read over my shoulder half the stuff in the
first lesson with his rusty 4 year old German skills. I do not have a background
in German--though my computer thought otherwise for a period of several
irritating months--and this is going to be an incredible challenge of Awesome!
That means, that no matter how bad you are, I will probably be worse at it! So
feel good about yourself and take a shot!

Icelandic can be compared with Latin, as far as the complexity and preservation
of cases and forms goes. Not that the vocabulary is at all similar, but
grammatically, it's the same level of crazy.

I say, why not?

Posted by Amalia Dillin at 14:12 2 comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: Norse



SATURDAY, OCTOBER 03, 2009


BACK TO BRAINS!


I've been saying for years that for women, styling each other's hair and makeup
is the human interpretation of social grooming in monkeys. Ever since I went to
college and shared a bathroom with a whole hall of girls, where I observed again
and again and again that the bathroom even more so than the lounge was where
congregation on conversation happened. Women are social groomers. We bond over
hair and makeup. Even those of us who eschew makeup and curling irons have been
known to submit to this grooming in the interest of socialization.

So now we're back to brains again-- Monkeys' grooming habits provide clues to
how we socialize.
Kind of obvious, right? Here's the twist. The larger the neocortex, the smaller
circle in which they concentrate their social grooming. The larger the
neocortex, the larger the groups in which these monkeys congregate, too. So,
larger groups but smaller groups of friends. But it's okay, because the larger
neocortex evidently allows for monkeys, and us, to balance more distant
relationships. Essentially, they can be pleasant to everyone without being best
friends forever with the entire group. The larger neocortex allows that
complexity.

According to this article, our neocortexes (neocortegi?) are three times the
size of these other monkeys. And that accounts for our ability to socialize on
such tremendous scales. We're balancing relationships with hundreds of people at
a time, as opposed to the 50 of even the more sophisticated monkeys. We have our
close friends, who we concentrate our time and effort on, and two hundred other
people we still associate with when we're put in the right situation. Go take a
look at the number of friends you have on facebook or myspace. How many of them
do you actually talk to on the phone? or spend time with once a week? How many
of them do you just check status updates on, and call it good?

Thank your neocortex!
And remember, it isn't total brain size that counts-- it's the size of the PARTS
of the brain that matters!

So what do you think this means about Hyenas and their greater ability to
cooperate? What part of the brain is it that is more effectively developed? And
what do their neocortexes look like?

Posted by Amalia Dillin at 13:27 3 comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: science



FRIDAY, OCTOBER 02, 2009


REFLECTIONS ON FURTHER EDUCATION


You know what I love about writing? Every project is a new opportunity to learn.

Not just to learn how to write better, and improve my own skill level, but also,
to research something new. Writing is a career path which allows one the luxury
of never having to settle down into one particular field. Sure, in college I
took English classes. Creative writing classes out the wazoo. But it wasn't the
only thing I did. I didn't go to college with the goal of getting a BA in
English. I hadn't intended on a liberal arts degree at all. I went to college
for Wildlife Biology. My ultimate goal was to be a zookeeper, and write on the
side, and while I was going to minor in English and suck up all the creative
writing classes I could, it wasn't my academic priority.

Of course, Wildlife Biology wasn't really my calling, and I realized that the
number and intensity of science classes it required was going to make me hate
myself and my life and my education, so instead of hating what I loved, I went
in a different direction. But the direction still wasn't English.


Read more »
Posted by Amalia Dillin at 14:33 2 comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: Classics, Norse, science, writing



TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 29, 2009


HYENAS COOPERATE, BUT DO WE?


First of all, I think the history of this article is a great example of how we
tend to overlook things about animals that aren't what we expect them to be. We
focus so much on our nearest relations in the animal kingdom, sometimes we blind
ourselves to the ones that aren't so closely related, but are still capable of
so many amazing and BRILLIANT things. We give other animals that aren't chimps
and gorillas short shrift because they're not human-like. Because they're not
"as smart" as the others.

The line that really caught me, was this:

Researchers have focused on primates for decades with an assumption that higher
cognitive functioning in large-brained animals should enable organized teamwork.
But Drea's study demonstrates that social carnivores, including dogs, may be
very good at cooperative problem solving, even though their brains are
comparatively smaller.

If you want to talk about brain size, maybe we should be looking at whales and
elephants. I don't think that it's the answer to the question of intelligence,
honestly. I don't think we're really able to measure intelligence effectively,
either. What is "smartest"? Smartest at a set task, at a set series of tasks,
but until we're able to really understand the mind of the animal, I don't think
we're ever really going to know who REALLY IS the smartest.

And that same above quote made me stop and reflect on human behavior. The part
about the assumption involving primates as large-brained animals and organized
teamwork. I think at some point we really get too smart for teamwork. We don't
want to teach other people what we can do, and we don't want to ask for help or
give help. And look at us! We fight amongst ourselves instead of cooperating.



Read more »
Posted by Amalia Dillin at 19:45 4 comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: science



SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2009


BREAK OUT THE TINFOIL HATS, MY FRIENDS!


Because, we're mind reading, now! (Well, okay, maybe that's an exaggeration.
we're only reading NUMBERS, but still!)

I can't be the only person who thinks this is incredibly cool. But forget about
people, I mean, not that mind reading wouldn't limit the infinite ways in which
we misunderstand each other, accidentally and purposeful, but my personal dream
has always been to be able to read the minds of animals! To find a way to
improve that communication!

Yeah, so maybe I sound kind of like a tree-hugger, but I'm really dying to know
what goes on in the brains of a lot of animals other than ourselves. Dolphins.
Elephants. Whales. Imagine what we could learn from these other species, if we
could only TALK to them. I mean, whales are incredibly mysterious. We don't
really understand them at all. We don't know where they go 9 months out of the
year. We don't know what they do with themselves. We don't know why they go
where they go that we CAN track. The Ocean itself is a mystery--but what if one
of its denizens was willing to show us the way? I bet a dolphin would be a
hilarious tour guide. And elephants-- what kind of smack are they talking about
us in the circus? Are they REALLY pissed off about being performers, or do they
like the attention and have strong relationships with their people? It's proven
that elephants experience depression, and have strong bonds with other
elephants, can they have them with people?

Seriously, mind reading, on any level, could offer us so many insights! To human
behavior, to animal behavior, to the world! To observe instinct acting on the
brain-- how does it work? Is it just impulse without thinking? is it collective
memory? How do other living things see the world? Feel about the world? Feel in
general!

My husband and I talk about this a lot. Or at least with frequency, because I'm
kind of obsessed with the idea of cross-species communication on a greater
level. He doesn't believe that mind reading will offer us much insight. He
thinks that the process of thought will be so different between ourselves and
any other species that it won't be translatable. I can't bring myself to agree
with him, but that's mostly just out of stubbornness. Maybe he's right, and
we'll need to learn some common language of thought, but I can't believe that
direct mind to mind communication would be impossible. I don't want to believe.
What do you believe?

And in the meantime, if it ever happens, sign me up!

Posted by Amalia Dillin at 11:12 No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: science



WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 2009


WHAT AN ODD TREND.


So this article from the wall street journal gave me some food for thought: New
Light on the Plight of Winter Babies.

Firstly, I didn't even realize that this was even a thing. Babies born in winter
have it harder? Don't do as well? Totally news to me. But I LOVE that this is
something that's been debated seemingly for so long, and is now being looked at
in a totally new and different way--that is, that perhaps the reason is because
there's a correlation between winter babies and lower income/lower class/less
educated families.

It also says in this article that babies born into the same family tend to have
birthdays around the same times. In my family, I'm the youngest of five
children. Our birthdays fall all within the months between March and mid
September, but we cluster in July, August and September. My oldest sister is the
oddball who was born in March. I'd never really thought about it at all before.
My parents are both highly educated individuals, and both came from families
where education was valued and appreciated. I'm not sure though, when my aunts
and uncles birthdays fall, but that's kind of outside of their data points,
since they were only looking at the years between 1989 and 2001. Honestly, my
entire family falls outside of their data points too.

But here's the other thing that fascinated me: this research is being done by
economists. It baffles me. Wouldn't this be more of a sociological issue, than
economical? But that's kind of the beauty of it too--people from different
backgrounds look at data differently, and can see things outside the box. This
is why people with backgrounds in liberal arts are valued in medicine. This is
why having a well rounded education (in my humble opinion) is important! This is
why it scares the crap out of me that in New York State, the Regents board has
all but wiped the Roman Empire and Classical History from is curriculum for
world history.

And while I'm on that topic-- not to betray my social networking addiction-- I
was looking at a facebook quiz that some people on my friendslist were taking,
and I noticed that Julius Caesar was classified as "evil" in the same vein as
Hitler. It really gets my goat, I'm not going to lie. Julius Caesar was a hero
to the Roman people. The only people who didn't like him were the senators, and
that was just because they didn't want to share their power. I'm not saying
Julius Caesar was any kind of angel, but certainly he doesn't deserve to be
classified or even spoken of in the same breath as Hitler, when a person is
discussing villainy.

And how on earth do you teach the rest of world history without the foundation
of the Roman Empire? I mean, it's the context for the rest of western
civilization!

Argh!
ahem.
And that is my first post after returning from vacation. Enjoy my unfocused
rantings.
Or, you know, not.

Posted by Amalia Dillin at 17:17 4 comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: science

Newer Posts Older Posts Home

Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)


ABOUT AMALIA DILLIN





I'm a writer kind of obsessed with mythology, history, animal behavior, and
comic books.

Author of the completed Fate of the Gods trilogy and the ongoing Orc Saga. I
also write historical fiction as Amalia Carosella and sexy rom-coms as Amalia
Theresa.

Twitter|Tumblr|Goodreads




BLOG ARCHIVE

 * ►  2023 (4)
   * ►  October (1)
   * ►  March (1)
   * ►  February (2)

 * ►  2022 (7)
   * ►  December (2)
   * ►  October (1)
   * ►  August (1)
   * ►  June (1)
   * ►  May (1)
   * ►  March (1)

 * ►  2021 (4)
   * ►  December (1)
   * ►  May (2)
   * ►  March (1)

 * ►  2020 (4)
   * ►  August (2)
   * ►  April (1)
   * ►  February (1)

 * ►  2019 (13)
   * ►  December (2)
   * ►  November (2)
   * ►  October (2)
   * ►  September (2)
   * ►  July (1)
   * ►  April (1)
   * ►  March (2)
   * ►  January (1)

 * ►  2018 (13)
   * ►  November (1)
   * ►  September (1)
   * ►  August (1)
   * ►  April (1)
   * ►  March (3)
   * ►  February (3)
   * ►  January (3)

 * ►  2017 (7)
   * ►  December (1)
   * ►  September (1)
   * ►  June (1)
   * ►  May (1)
   * ►  April (2)
   * ►  February (1)

 * ►  2016 (21)
   * ►  December (2)
   * ►  November (5)
   * ►  October (3)
   * ►  September (1)
   * ►  August (1)
   * ►  July (2)
   * ►  May (2)
   * ►  April (1)
   * ►  March (1)
   * ►  February (1)
   * ►  January (2)

 * ►  2015 (54)
   * ►  December (1)
   * ►  November (7)
   * ►  October (9)
   * ►  September (5)
   * ►  August (2)
   * ►  June (3)
   * ►  May (5)
   * ►  April (4)
   * ►  March (9)
   * ►  February (4)
   * ►  January (5)

 * ►  2014 (61)
   * ►  December (2)
   * ►  November (6)
   * ►  October (8)
   * ►  September (6)
   * ►  August (3)
   * ►  July (4)
   * ►  June (4)
   * ►  May (7)
   * ►  April (5)
   * ►  March (7)
   * ►  February (6)
   * ►  January (3)

 * ►  2013 (88)
   * ►  December (3)
   * ►  November (5)
   * ►  October (10)
   * ►  September (10)
   * ►  August (11)
   * ►  July (7)
   * ►  June (2)
   * ►  May (5)
   * ►  April (9)
   * ►  March (8)
   * ►  February (10)
   * ►  January (8)

 * ►  2012 (70)
   * ►  December (4)
   * ►  November (8)
   * ►  October (9)
   * ►  September (1)
   * ►  August (7)
   * ►  June (2)
   * ►  May (10)
   * ►  April (8)
   * ►  March (9)
   * ►  February (9)
   * ►  January (3)

 * ►  2011 (87)
   * ►  December (4)
   * ►  November (2)
   * ►  October (5)
   * ►  September (8)
   * ►  August (9)
   * ►  July (7)
   * ►  June (8)
   * ►  May (4)
   * ►  April (10)
   * ►  March (12)
   * ►  February (9)
   * ►  January (9)

 * ►  2010 (142)
   * ►  December (7)
   * ►  November (7)
   * ►  October (11)
   * ►  September (7)
   * ►  August (13)
   * ►  July (7)
   * ►  June (13)
   * ►  May (12)
   * ►  April (13)
   * ►  March (17)
   * ►  February (16)
   * ►  January (19)

 * ▼  2009 (80)
   * ▼  December (10)
     * NO-Kiss Fest and Critiques
     * Endangered Languages
     * In Honor of Mistletoe-- my contribution to the Kis...
     * Official Kissing Day Blogfest!
     * The Best Laid Plans...
     * Tuesday Recap--Cookie Extravaganza
     * I was tagged. Now you are too.
     * How Do You Read?
     * A Trip To The Met
     * Not-Yet-Of Troy Series Links
   * ►  November (13)
     * Body Image in Little Girls
     * New Letters!
     * Unstoppable Bonus Content Through Thanksgiving!
     * Elephant Vengeance
     * The Essential Thor (no footnotes, just gut.)
     * Icelandic Language Day!
     * More Bonus Content
     * Fiction, Faith, and Mythology
     * A new Not-Yet-Of Troy Letter! Et Cetera.
     * Delusions and Hallucinations
     * Imaginary Friends Are Not Just For Kids
     * Some Teaser Content
     * A (slightly disorganized) Tale of Two Fathers
   * ►  October (26)
     * Public Service Announcements!
     * Back to Science! Superbrainpower-palooza
     * Is All Mythology Created Equal?
     * Holding Back
     * Beta For The Win, and What I Love About Writing
     * Research-palooza
     * Why my Textbook on Mythology is Trash
     * Some (Disorganized?) Thoughts on The Cypria Fragme...
     * On Apollodorus's The Library and Fairy Tales
     * The Heroides
     * Why Superman is AWESOME regardless of his perfection.
     * Vacation!
     * Food and Water as Pain Reliever?
     * Conjecture and Frustrations from The Iliad
     * The Uncanny Valley and Monkeys!
     * So what I told you is true, from a certain point ...
     * The pitfalls of electronics.
     * The Mystery of the Norse Mythos
     * Ancient History and Modern Politics
     * Clothing and Apparel, for the GODS
     * The Nordic Bronze Age
     * Answering Life's Childhood Questions Through Writing
     * More Language Fun
     * Random Language Learning!
     * Back to Brains!
     * Reflections on Further Education
   * ►  September (6)
     * Hyenas cooperate, but do we?
     * Break Out the Tinfoil Hats, My Friends!
     * what an odd trend.
   * ►  August (6)
   * ►  July (10)
   * ►  June (4)
   * ►  May (5)

 * ►  2008 (6)
   * ►  May (1)
   * ►  April (3)
   * ►  March (2)

 * ►  2005 (1)
   * ►  February (1)




LABELS

#NAMEthatBUTT A Broken Horse A Sea of Sorrow A Winter's Enchantment about me
Adam Aegeus Aeneas Affairs of the Gods Agamemnon Amalia Carosella Amalia Theresa
Antiope Aphrodite Apollo Appearances and Events Ares Ariadne Arrow-Odd Artemis
Arthurian Legend Assurbanipal Athena Athens Bacchus Baldur bbc4 radio Beyond
Fate Biblical Myth blogfests Blood of the Queen Braving Fate Bronze Age Greece
Brynhild By Helen's Hand Castor and Pollux Celtic Myth Classics Concealing Fate
Contemporary Romance Cost of Living Cronus Cú Chulainn Daughter of a Thousand
Years Demeter Dionysus ebooks Enduring Fate Europa Eve Facets of Fate Fairy
Tales Fate Forgotten Fate of the Gods Faults of Fate Favor of God Fiction
Finding Fate Forged by Fate From Asgard With Love Frost Bitten Twice Shy Hades
Havamal Heathenry Heimdall Hel Helen Helen of Sparta Helen of Troy Hephaestus
Hera Heracles Hercules Hermes Hippodamia Homer Honor Among Orcs Imaginary
Friends It's MAGIC Just Gut Kate and Sully King of the Lapiths Lake Union
Publishing Loki Medea Medusa Menelaus mermaids Misc History mythological
monsters Name that Butt! Norse North American Mythology Odin Odysseus Of Gods
and Jotuns Orc Romance Orc Saga paperbacks Paris Patreon Persephone Perseus
Pirithous Playing House Playing it Safe Playing to Win Poseidon Postcards from
Asgard Ragnarok reading revision Romulus and Remus Saga of the Volsungs Samson
and Delilah science self publishing Settling Up short stories Sif Sigurd sirens
Son of Zeus Sparta Tamer of Horses Taming Fate Tempting Fate The House of Lions
The Odyssey The Queen and her Brook Horse Theseus Should Really Have His Own Tag
Thjalfi Thor Through Blood and Starlight Troy Ullr Venus Victorious Viking Age
Viking Romances Wielding Fate Winter Games World Weaver Press writing Zeus



PAST POSTS YOU SHOULDN'T MISS

 * Thor in Comics, Myth, and Film; and the Christianization of Myth
 * Being a Hero Sucks!
 * In Defense of Theseus' Honor
 * The Essential Thor
 * Thor and Loki
 * The Goats of Thor
 * On Helen and Theseus
 * The Character of Paris
 * The Daughters of Ares
 * Pirithous, Son of Zeus
 * Snorri's Agenda in the Prose Edda




ORC SAGA, ETC!


Amazon
and

Available now!
Amazon

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Amazon | B&N


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Available now!
&

Amazon | B&N
&

Amazon | B&N
&

Amazon | B&N


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




SUBSCRIBE!

Posts
Atom

Posts

All Comments
Atom

All Comments





FOLLOWERS




Header by Amalia Dillin


Privacy:
Blogger/Google uses cookies to track you when you visit this page but I
personally am not collecting any identifying data. Sometimes I look at the
general stats blogger/google offers me to determine popular posts and subject
matter, but that's about the extent of things.


When you leave a comment on a post/page, blogger/google may collect information
according to their own policies, and whatever information you've posted in those
comments, including email addresses, will remain on the blog within the comment
you've posted (unless you or I decide to delete it). I won't use that
information for anything that you have not explicitly consented to (for example:
if you provide an email address so I can contact you if you win a giveaway, I'll
use it to let you know you've won, and allow you to claim your prize by
submitting only the information necessary for me to fulfill the terms of the
giveaway. That email thread may become part of my records for
reference/accounting, but I will not use that information in any other way
without explicit consent.)


Should you subscribe to my Newsletter, you'll be consenting to receive
promotional emails from me. I will not use that information for anything other
than that e-correspondence. When you reply to a newsletter email for any reason,
I will keep that email thread for my own reference/accounting, but will not use
any personal information provided in those emails for any purpose beyond the
awarding of a claimed prize without your explicit consent.



Picture Window theme. Theme images by Blogger. Powered by Blogger.