www.asiaiplaw.com Open in urlscan Pro
172.104.63.121  Public Scan

Submitted URL: https://ddec1-0-en-ctp.trendmicro.com/wis/clicktime/v1/query?url=https://www.asiaiplaw.com/section/cover-story/beyond-the-courtroom-ip...
Effective URL: https://www.asiaiplaw.com/section/cover-story/beyond-the-courtroom-ip-litigation-as-a-competitive-tool
Submission: On December 08 via api from RU — Scanned from DE

Form analysis 2 forms found in the DOM

GET https://www.asiaiplaw.com/search

<form method="get" action="https://www.asiaiplaw.com/search" class="form-inline">
  <div class="form-group"><label for="search-keyword" class="sr-only">Search</label>
    <div class="input-group">
      <div class="input-group-addon pr0"><i class="fa fa-search"></i></div> <input type="text" id="search-keyword" placeholder="Enter Keyword" name="keyword" value="" class="form-control">
      <div class="input-group-addon pl0 clear-input"><i class="fa fa-times"></i></div>
    </div>
  </div>
</form>

GET https://www.asiaiplaw.com/search

<form method="get" action="https://www.asiaiplaw.com/search" class="form-inline">
  <div class="form-group mb0">
    <div class="input-group">
      <div class="input-group-addon"><i class="fa fa-search"></i></div> <label for="search-keyword-mobile" class="hidden">Search</label> <input type="text" id="search-keyword-mobile" placeholder="Enter Keyword" name="keyword" class="form-control">
    </div>
  </div>
</form>

Text Content

 * Login
 * Register
 * Subscribe

 * Language (EN)
   * Chinese Simplified
   * Chinese Traditional


 * Sections
   * Cover Story
   * In Depth
   * News Analysis
   * The Verdict
   * People & Places
   * IP Analysts
   * Strategy Guides
   * IP Experts
 * Sectors
   * Trademarks
   * Prosecution
   * Pharma & Biotech
   * Patents
   * Media
   * Litigation
   * Licensing & Franchising
   * IT & Telecoms
   * IP Management
   * Industrial Designs
   * Enforcement
   * Dispute Resolution
   * Copyright
 * Jurisdictions
 * IP Awards
 * Events
 * IP Experts
 * Law Firms

Search


Search
 * Login
 * Register
 * Subscribe

 * Language (EN)
   * Chinese Simplified
   * Chinese Traditional

 * Sections
   * Cover Story
   * In Depth
   * News Analysis
   * The Verdict
   * People & Places
   * IP Analysts
   * Strategy Guides
   * IP Experts
 * Sectors
   * Trademarks
   * Prosecution
   * Pharma & Biotech
   * Patents
   * Media
   * Litigation
   * Licensing & Franchising
   * IT & Telecoms
   * IP Management
   * Industrial Designs
   * Enforcement
   * Dispute Resolution
   * Copyright
 * Jurisdictions
 * IP Awards
 * Events
 * IP Experts
 * Law Firms


 1. Asia IP
 2. Section
 3. Cover Story


BEYOND THE COURTROOM: IP LITIGATION AS A COMPETITIVE TOOL

30 November 2024





IP litigation drives market dominance and protects rights, but it requires
balance with other strategies. Espie Angelica A. de Leon explores its
advantages, challenges and strategic use for gaining a competitive edge. 

There is more to intellectual property litigation than courtroom proceedings and
winning the case. A party or business enterprise that gets a favourable ruling
from the court does not just win the case and be awarded damages. It also gains
the upper hand in the market by enhancing its competitiveness and position in
the industry. Plus, it sends a positive message to consumers regarding its brand
image. 



“When companies choose litigation as a competitive tool, they typically aim to
gain a competitive advantage or achieve a market effect rather than merely
pursuing a specific interest, such as protecting legitimate rights,” said Spring
Chang, founding partner at Chang Tsi & Partners in Beijing. “This is especially
common in the field of IP due to its exclusive nature.” 

Indeed, IP litigation can be a powerful competitive tool. 

First, it is a strong indication of the IP right owner’s serious resolve to
address the infringement of its IP. If the court rules in its favour, the
company or IP right owner can seek damages, interim measures to stop the
infringement from causing further damages to their IP rights, a public apology
and an immediate cease of the infringement. The IPR owner may also request
evidence reservation for submitting claims in later proceedings. 



“IP litigation is a means to enforce an IP owner’s rights and can be both a
sword to sue others and a shield to countersue. IP owners can seek a preliminary
injunction to stop their competitors from selling a product which may infringe
the IP owner’s rights or [force them to] redesign the product which hinders the
competitor’s business, providing the IP owner with a competitive business edge,”
said Eugene Yang, a patent attorney at Amica Law in Singapore. 

One example is the patent case in the United States involving Apple, a
frontrunner in the global smartwatch industry, and Masimo, a provider of patient
monitoring devices, including smartwatches. Masimo is known for its pulse
oximetry technology. Masimo accused Apple of infringing its pulse oximetry
patents as the latter’s Series 6 watch came out in the market in 2020 with
features for blood oxygen monitoring. Apple was forced to redesign some of its
smartwatch products to remove these blood oxygen monitoring components. In this
case, Masimo used their patents as a sword. Apple then countersued for patent
infringement, using its patents as a shield. 

A successful case also serves as a precedent, effectively deterring potential
repeat infringement actions or attempts to infringe. “Given the adverse party
could suffer a tremendous burden of compensation, apology, losses of investments
and others, the IPR owner can use the case as a strong reference for their IP
protection program in the market,” said Hai Dinh, a senior associate who
specializes in enforcement matters at S&O IP in Ho Chi Minh City. 

“Also, they might leverage the lengthy litigation process to delay the
competitor’s product release or increase the competitor’s costs and time
expenditure, thereby maintaining their own market leadership,” Chang said. 

“This will also build confidence on the part of the consuming public with regard
to the high quality and value of the IP that is subject of the litigation. The
ultimate objective of course is to attain a stronger market position for the IP
owner, since by enforcing IP rights, it will be able to prevent competitors from
using their patented technologies, copyrighted materials or trademarks,” added
Divina Ilas-Panganiban, partner at Quisumbing Torres in Manila. 



“The more IPR owners pursue IP litigation, the more the IP protection regime in
such jurisdiction is transparent and effective,” Dinh noted, “which is a sign of
a fair, competitive and trusting business environment.”  

The downsides of litigation 

The downside of litigation is that it can be quite expensive in most
jurisdictions. For smaller companies engaged in disputes with larger firms, this
could be a challenge.  



“In case of regular litigation proceedings, the business would be required to
shell a huge amount which may not always be optimal and advisable. It is, thus,
important to evaluate any action in the context of returns with respect to
competition and costs involved,” advised Kangan Roda, founding partner at
illuminIP in New Delhi. 

“However, there are ways to mitigate this, for example, via intellectual
property insurance, external funding sources and arbitration and mediation
centres like the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Arbitration and
Mediation Centre and the Singapore Mediation Centre,” shared Yang. 

The lengthy process of litigation and the heavy burden of evidence involved add
to these challenges. 



Businesses should also consider the effects of IP litigation on innovation.
“Overly aggressive litigation can stifle innovation if parties become
exaggeratingly cautious about potential IP conflicts. Hence, as IP lawyers, it
is incumbent upon us to fully explain to our clients the advantages and
disadvantages of IP litigation,” said Ilas-Panganiban. 

Using litigation as a competitive tool may also complicate the market
environment and structure. These may affect the business itself. Chang
explained: “Frequent litigation can lead to strained relationships between
companies and their competitors, even disrupting the cooperative atmosphere
within the industry. Such tension may also affect a company’s reputation within
the industry and its future collaboration opportunities while increasing market
uncertainty and impacting investor and consumer confidence. Additionally,
competitors may fight back, leading to prolonged legal battles or seeking new
competitive strategies or market opportunities, thereby altering the market
landscape. For example, many well-known companies have been engaged in patent
litigation for years, which not only affects the competitive dynamics of the
relevant markets but also makes other companies more cautious in designing and
developing new products to avoid similar legal disputes.” 

How to best use litigation for your competitive advantage 

Considering these downsides, how can businesses and lawyers best leverage
litigation as a competitive tool to gain an advantage over the other party in
the dispute and over the competition in general?  

Aside from seeking injunctive relief, damages and others, the following are
critical steps that companies and their lawyers should take:  

Formulate a comprehensive IP strategy. Such strategy should include litigation.
“IP is one of the spaces which is still rapidly developing worldwide, and as
such, it becomes important to keep oneself updated on the case laws and the
evolving jurisprudence,” Roda explained. 

Get your IP rights registered as soon as possible, properly document the
evidence to prove the existence of IP rights and implement protection mechanisms
for other IP rights such as trade secrets. According to Dinh, these are the
first steps toward any successful litigation case. “Once the ‘arsenal of IP
rights’ is ready, gathering evidence of the infringement and making sure that
the evidence is preserved legitimately to be valid before the court are equally
important to the registration,” he said.  

Before deciding on litigation as a business strategy, thoroughly assess your
litigation goals and potential outcomes. In case of adverse outcomes, lawyers
should consider the risk appetite and commercial interests of their clients.
Analyze industry dynamics and competitor situations. Understand the other party
in the litigation case by looking into their scope of business, the level of the
infringement and local enforcement practices.  

“There is a fundamental difference between using litigation as a legitimate
competitive tool and exploiting it for improper gains,” said Chang. “The market
encourages fair competition, and litigation is a right of enterprises, but it is
essential to avoid falling into the category of malicious litigation. This
requires companies to thoroughly evaluate the specific circumstances when
considering litigation as a competitive tool.” 

Strategically time your actions. “Indicators that may assist the best time to
proceed include such time as when you see growth, steady or abrupt, in the
business of the competition or launch of IPO or any investments into the said
competition. Initiation of your actions or proceedings at such times would be
optimal and would yield the most positive and effective results,” said Roda. 

Be aware of the potential weaknesses and obstacles that might turn the case
against you and prepare for these in advance. Lawyers should serve as efficient
watchtowers for their clients, giving them the go signal whether to pursue or
pause litigation, negotiate and discuss, or retract.  

Update your strategies. “During the litigation process, it is essential to
update strategies based on actual circumstances, such as engaging in settlement
negotiations to quickly achieve business objectives and avoid the uncertainties
and costs associated with prolonged litigation,” explained Chang. 

Lawyers and their clients must closely strategize, not just in terms of how to
go about the actual case but also how to manage public perception through
effective communication. This will help enhance the client’s reputation as a
strong defender of its IP assets. 

Review and update your IP to ensure its validity and strategic alignment.
“Clients should be prepared to proceed with litigation to enforce their IP
rights and advance their business but should actively consider settlement and
mediation to resolve the dispute and achieve an acceptable resolution for their
business,” Yang noted.  

According to Dinh, IP litigation proceedings vary among jurisdictions and this
isn’t always a comfortable experience. International collaboration is now
underway to simplify the proceedings and further enhance the role of IP
litigation. 

In the case of Vietnam, the government has now adopted the establishment of a
specialized IP court. “Accordingly, it shows the progressive attitude of the
government in promoting a strong, swift and effective IP litigation system,
which is vital to the development and growth of the business market and
innovation in a developing country like Vietnam,” Dinh said. 

There are other strategies for protecting and leveraging IP. Among these are
licensing agreements and collaborative partnerships. For Ilas-Panganiban, it is
crucial to balance the use of IP litigation as a competitive tool with these
other strategies.  

“Based on our firm’s experience, IP litigation is not always the best solution
to protect and enforce IP rights,” she revealed. “Nevertheless, IP litigation
can be a powerful competitive tool because it demonstrates the capacity and
solid determination of the IP owner to fully exercise its exclusive rights over
the IP.”  

And, as long as it is used judiciously, litigation certainly helps businesses
gain a competitive edge or strengthen their foothold in the market and promotes
a positive business environment for the jurisdiction. 



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

0 Shares Share Tweet LinkedIn Email
Tags: IP Management Litigation Innovation IP Rights


LAW FIRMS


CHINA

 * AFD China Intellectual Property
 * CCPIT Patent And Trademark Office
 * China Patent Agent (HK)
 * Fairsky Law Office
 * Ge Cheng & Co
 * GoldenGate Lawyers
 * HFG Law & Intellectual Property
 * HongFangLaw
 * IntellecPro
 * Jadong IP Law Firm
 * Kelvin Chia Partnership
 * Kingvie Lawyers
 * NTD Intellectual Property Attorneys
 * Shanghai Pacific Legal
 * Sunshine Intellectual Property International
 * Tiantai Law Firm
 * Uni-intel Patent and Trademark Law Firm
 * Unitalen Attorneys at Law
 * Yuhong IP Law Firm
 * Zhifan IP Attorneys


INDIA

 * Anand and Anand
 * Chandrakant M. Joshi India Patent & Trademark Attorneys
 * Dennemeyer India Private Limited
 * Jupiter Law Partners
 * Krishnamurthy & Co
 * Lall & Sethi
 * LexOrbis
 * Rahul Chaudhry & Partners
 * S. Majumdar & Co.
 * Singh & Singh
 * ZeusIP


PHILIPPINES

 * Hechanova & Co.
 * Mirandah Asia
 * Ortega Bacorro Odulio Calma & Carbonell


SINGAPORE

 * Allen & Gledhill
 * Dentons Rodyk
 * Drew & Napier
 * Kelvin Chia Partnership
 * Mirandah Asia


VIETNAM

 * Bizconsult Law Firm
 * INVESTIP
 * Kelvin Chia Partnership
 * Mirandah Asia
 * Pham & Associates
 * TRI VIET & ASSOCIATES


RELATED ARTICLES


AI REVOLUTIONIZES AGRICULTURE: HOW AI FARM TECH IS SHAPING THE FUTURE OF
SUSTAINABLE FARMING

06 December 2024


BIP ASIA FORUM 2024 FOCUSES ON INNOVATION AND IP FINANCING

06 December 2024


PIL FILED IN DELHI HIGH COURT ADDRESSING UNAUTHORIZED USE OF ARTISTIC WORKS BY
AI

12 November 2024


KAZAKHSTAN’S ASTANA INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CENTRE APPROVES IP REGULATIONS

05 December 2024


 * 
 * 


ABOUT US

Business Intelligence from the Top

Asia IP is the region’s leading source for analysis of the IP issues facing
companies in Asia; a vital source of intelligence for IP-owning companies, and
law firms that want to keep ahead of the key issues. Focusing on the issues
behind the headlines, it provides unparalleled access to the challenges and
solutions companies face when trying to protect their intellectual assets.

Asia IP is published by the Apex Asia Media Group, a leading independent
publisher based in Hong Kong.

 * Home
 * Jurisdictions
 * IP Experts
 * Law Firms
 * Events
 * Media Information
 * Terms and Condition
 * Privacy Policy
 * Contact Us


SECTORS

Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Copyright Licensing & Franchising Media
Enforcement
Dispute Resolution IP Management Pharma & Biotech Litigation Prosecution IT &
Telecoms

Copyright © 2024 Asia IP. All rights reserved.
Halcyon Web Design

We recommend to enable your javascript upon using this website to see full
functionality.
Please click the link on how to enable it: https://www.enable-javascript.com/

Please wait while the page is loading...