www.washingtonpost.com Open in urlscan Pro
23.45.108.250  Public Scan

Form analysis
0 forms found in the DOM

Text Content

Accessibility statementSkip to main content

Democracy Dies in Darkness
SubscribeSign in
ClimateEnvironment Weather Climate Solutions Climate Lab Green Living Business
of Climate
ClimateEnvironment Weather Climate Solutions Climate Lab Green Living Business
of Climate


HOW FLORIDA LET A TOP INSURER ABANDON HOMEOWNERS IN THEIR TIME OF GREATEST NEED

By Brianna Sacks
Updated August 6, 2023 at 11:18 a.m. EDT|Published August 4, 2023 at 8:43 a.m.
EDT

A pile of debris remains just steps from the beach in Fort Myers Beach, Fla.,
almost nine months after Hurricane Ian ravaged the area. (Thomas Simonetti for
The Washington Post)

Listen
24 min

Share
Comment on this storyComment5534

NORTH PORT, Fla. — Every week or so, Edward Raggie walks through his front door
and enters a painful, infuriating time warp.

Everything looks exactly the way it did that day in December, when he and his
wife, Joanne Ragge, hastily packed up their Hurricane Ian-battered home after
learning that dangerous mold had spread behind their white ceilings and bright
blue walls. Their roof still leaks, its protective tarp peeling from the hot
sun. Inside, brown insulation from the gaping hole in their ceiling pools on
their swollen, lifted floors. Boxes of their family photos and belongings,
stacked haphazardly, are still waiting to be moved out of the living room’s
dank, musty air.



The couple, in their late 60s, are frozen in this “hell,” Ed says, because their
insurance company, United Property and Casualty, ignored their claims for months
after the hurricane and then severely underpaid them before going insolvent
earlier this year.

Advertisement

Story continues below advertisement



“UPC abandoned me,” said Ed, a recently retired tortilla distributor who paid as
much as $1,930 a year to UPC for insurance. “I never missed a payment. I
expected them to do what they said in my contract: return my house to what it
was the day before the hurricane hit. I never even got an inkling of that from
these people, and now I know why: They were going to go out of business.”

UPC, the ninth property insurer in Florida to go insolvent since 2021, and the
largest to do so in 15 years, left many of its Florida customers in a similar
nightmare, facing what is predicted to be a powerful hurricane season with still
unfixed, hazardous homes, drained life savings and, in some cases, no insurance
to protect them.

Suddenly losing their carrier while still in the thick of recovery was shocking
to the Raggies, as well as other homeowners. But UPC’s collapse was long in the
making — and is one of the most glaring examples of how, in the age of climate
change, Florida’s insurance system has been failing to protect residents after
they endure a major disaster.

UPC hemorrhaged money over the past six years, in large part because of costly
claims from several major hurricanes. During that time, the company began to cut
insurance adjusters’ damage estimates, and underpay and ignore increasingly
desperate policyholders, according to a Washington Post investigation based on
interviews with nearly two dozen people, including those who worked for UPC,
policyholders, insurance experts and a review of hundreds of documents from
regulators, adjusters, court cases, financial filings and other sources.

The company also underestimated how much it would have to spend to cover claims,
but still paid shareholders, including top executives who owned a significant
percentage of the company, millions of dollars in dividends, data showed.

State officials, who said failing to reserve enough money was one of the primary
reasons UPC went insolvent, struggled to respond as the situation worsened.
People in the industry flagged evidence of alleged wrongdoing to regulators, but
said their concerns were not seriously reviewed. And even though officials
initiated monthly check-ins with UPC as its finances deteriorated, they
mistakenly believed UPC could cover homeowners’ claims up until just shortly
before the insolvency.





Now, the state-run Florida Insurance Guaranty Association is responsible for
trying to close 22,000 UPC claims, which will take more than a year and probably
cost around $600 million, officials say. For the first time since Hurricane
Andrew in 1992, the state has to levy an emergency assessment on nearly all
Florida residents to help cover the cost of such a massive insolvency, further
spiking homeowners’ rates.

Advertisement

Story continues below advertisement



While Florida residents are shouldering the burden of the insurer’s collapse,
its former executives and shareholders are in better shape.

UPC was the centerpiece of a larger insurance company, United Insurance Holdings
Corp. The company has seen its stock price, which had declined dramatically in
the wake of UPC’s struggles, bounce back more than 1,000 percent since December
— adding more than $200 million in value. The company, which has since
rebranded, has been touting its new, more lucrative future to prospective
investors, saying it’s much stronger for getting out of the home insurance
business.

While Hurricane Ian was a historic disaster — the most costly to ever hit
Florida — industry experts say the state has not adequately prepared for the
cost of such calamities, leaving the Raggies and other homeowners without
dependable insurance and with little recourse to do anything about it. Despite
lawmakers passing a wave of pro-industry reforms last year that they touted
would stabilize the industry, two national carriers have pulled back coverage or
dropped customers within recent weeks.



UPC did not want to comment for this story, Brook Adler, United Insurance
Holdings’ general counsel, said in an email. Its chief executive and chairman,
Daniel Peed, did not return requests for comment.

But in earnings calls, Peed — who, along with his wife, owns nearly 50 percent
of the company, according to company filings — has attributed many of UPC’s
problems and serious financial losses to lawsuits and big storms, as well as
increased costs for reinsurance, which carriers often rely on to cover big
disaster expenses. The company was facing significant losses from claims due to
“increasing inflation and excessive litigation, driving increased severity,” he
said in a call last year.

In March, Peed told investors he was “deeply disappointed” that Ian’s
significant losses “ultimately resulted in receivership of United P & C” and
that they were “working diligently” with the state to support policyholders.

Policyholders, though, are still waiting for that support.

Advertisement

Story continues below advertisement



Ed Raggie and Joanne Ragge (who spell their last names differently) have not
seen another dime since UPC sent them two checks totaling $31,200 right before
Christmas last year, without a final determination letter outlining their damage
and what the payment would cover, as is required by Florida law. The amount
stood in stark contrast to the $130,000 an adjusting company they hired
estimated it would take to repair and remediate their home, according to
estimates seen by The Post.

Around the same time last winter, a contractor who surveyed the interior with a
moisture meter told the couple to “get the hell out because we would get sick
from the mold,” Ed Raggie said. By then, he’d already developed a strange,
hacking cough that would not go away.



In early January, the couple moved into their son Jeremiah Raggie’s small,
one-bedroom house, which also sustained damage from the storm. It was all they
could afford because, they said, UPC had stopped responding to them and they
couldn’t get any more information on whether alternate living expenses would be
covered. Jeremiah also was insured through UPC, and he said he too only got a
small check — $11,000 — that will barely put a dent in what it costs to fix his
leaking roof, damaged stucco and other issues.

For months, other families have shared their horror stories and expressed their
mounting frustration and desperation with their carrier’s silence, behavior and
insolvency in interviews, and in Facebook and neighborhood groups. Families said
letters of denial or coverage determinations never arrived. Their case managers
would disappear and new ones would be assigned, restarting the case work —
sometimes up to seven times. When UPC did make a coverage decision, the amounts
were low. Few people interviewed by The Post had any idea that UPC was in such
dire financial trouble before Ian hit.



Though UPC held 4 percent of the Florida market share, the insurance company had
the second most complaints in 2020-2021 — representing 7 percent of the roughly
24,000 complaints closed by the Florida Department of Financial Services during
that period. Nearly all of those complaints had to do with how the carrier
handled claims, according to public records from the agency, which investigates
insurers for misconduct.

“UPC appeared to abandon their customers at their greatest time of need
following the catastrophic hurricane,” said Mark Friedlander, the director of
communications for the Insurance Information Institute, an industry association.
He added that thousands of policyholders “were very distressed about a lack of
response” months before the insurer collapsed.

UPC did take some action to try to salvage its business. In 2022, United
Holdings said it put about $75 million into the beleaguered carrier to try to
keep it afloat. It sold its St. Petersburg headquarters and businesses in other
states and handed over more than 91,000 policies to a new Florida insurer. A
board member still involved with United Holdings who spoke on the condition of
anonymity to speak freely about the matter defended Peed’s actions.

“He did everything he could to try to save it and poured a lot of money into the
company,” the board member said. “He lost an incredible amount of money out of
his own pocket to try to keep the company going for people’s livelihoods.”

Advertisement

Story continues below advertisement



Michael Yaworsky, Florida’s insurance commissioner, said that state regulators
had been on top of monitoring UPC’s behavior and financials. In an interview, he
explained how his office was “pretty aggressive when it came to our response to
the evolving situation with United and UPC.”

“We met the moment each time something developed,” he said of UPC’s struggles.

A big problem, Yaworsky said, is that his office had been limited in what they
could do regarding how parent companies act and what they do with their money.
He pointed to recent legislation, including the new Insurer Accountability Act,
that has given his agency more resources and reach to better govern insurers,
though the toughest provisions of the law were stripped from the final version.
Officials have pledged to fully investigate UPC’s conduct and any allegations of
bad behavior.

UPC’s business model, insurance and financial experts say, reflects a lax
regulatory framework that has made it even harder for Florida residents to get
back on their feet after disasters.

“Insurance companies have been given a tremendous amount of leeway in Florida,”
Birny Birnbaum, the director of the Center for Economic Justice and a former
insurance regulator said in an interview. “Light regulation let these smaller
companies come in and cherry pick what they want to cover. When there is no
hurricane, they can make a tremendous amount of money. When there is one,
executives can walk away without much liability and a lot richer.”



UPC was founded in 1999 with the mission to “keep the promise” to the
“policyholders who count on us at the time of greatest need.” For nearly a
decade, it enjoyed a lucky streak without a devastating hurricane and, with help
from the state, picked up millions in new policies. In 2016, UPC merged with
another insurance group. It was a “transformational” deal that would make UPC
the “premier provider of property insurance in catastrophe-exposed areas,” its
chief executive said at the time.

But just a year later, Hurricane Irma ripped through Florida, followed by
Hurricane Michael in 2018, and UPC started to lose a lot of money to claims.
These annual losses grew from $35 million to well over $150 million, according
to financial filings. Along the way, UPC kept increasing estimates of how much
it would have to pay out, according to filings, which were reviewed by experts,
including Demotech, a credit-rating agency that deemed UPC financially unstable
last August, right before Ian hit.

“They definitely had a reserving problem,” said Joseph Petrelli, the president
of Demotech. “There was not enough money to take care of everyone they owed
money to.”

During this period, the carrier started to become much more aggressive in
deploying tactics to deny, delay and underpay homeowners after that disaster and
subsequent weather events, according to interviews with three former adjusters,
policyholders and their attorneys, as well as internal and court documents.

Kestra Brown, a veteran, described her home as a “war zone” after Hurricane
Michael tore through Panama City, Fla., in 2018. After sending her a few
payments totaling $40,000, Brown says, UPC all but disappeared. The company
refused to pay for any more repairs or for her and her son to live outside her
gutted, mold-ridden home despite Brown repeatedly sending in supplemental
evidence and trying to get in touch with her desk adjusters, who “changed more
than I changed my underwear,” she said.

She and her son were in “survival mode,” she said. For a year, they had no
kitchen. Photos show black mold splattered on the ceilings. To try to protect
them, her son used plastic tarps to make new walls and floors. In 2019, Brown
sued the carrier. Her case was one of hundreds filed against the carrier after
that storm.

Advertisement

Story continues below advertisement



Documents obtained through her complaint show that UPC did not document all of
Brown’s damage, changed the field report, had the wrong date for her claim and
ignored the recommendation of their own retained expert, a contractor, who said
it would take “just north of $118,000” to put her home “back into pre-loss
condition.”

Share this articleShare

During depositions and the trial, a UPC corporate representative accused Brown
of failing to turn in required documents on time, as is required in her
contract. The representative also said Brown had exhausted her limits for
alternative living expenses and had gutted the house without first consulting
them.

However, emails read during the trial indicated that Brown had made multiple
attempts over a period of months to get in touch with UPC and ultimately
submitted what they wanted, but they never responded. In October 2021, the jury
sided with Brown and found that UPC had breached their contract and owed her
$140,000. In February 2022 — four years after the storm — she finally got the
check she needed to finish repairing her home.

“These people knew my walls were broken and crumbling,” she said. “They put me
through hell, and I say that as an Operation Iraqi Freedom War veteran.”

Adjusters working for UPC saw what was happening to homeowners on the inside. At
the end of 2019, Lari Piscitelli joined the company as an independent adjuster
to handle claims. He and other contractors grew increasingly alarmed at how
their loss estimates were being cut and edited. Piscitelli and other adjusters
said managers would tell them to join last-minute calls and give directives to
essentially ignore what they were seeing during their inspections, to stop
writing for full roof replacements and to not even use the word “damage” in
their reports. They provided claims notes, voice mails and a text message to
back up their assertions.

Piscitelli, who had been in the industry for six years, said the carrier seemed
to spend more money fighting claims than paying them and was “playing games with
everything.”



Many of the claims they were handling were still from Hurricane Irma, according
to Piscitelli and two other adjusters. It is common to see claims from a major
hurricane submitted months or even years later, especially in Florida, said
Friedlander and others, because serious issues like roof problems and water
intrusion can take awhile to appear. At the time, Florida residents had up to
three years to file or add to a disaster-related claim.

But UPC made it clear they did not want to pay those, three adjusters said, and
constantly changed their rules and guidelines.

Internal claims notes from 2019, obtained by The Post, capture the
back-and-forth between several field workers and UPC desk adjusters, who told
those who inspected the homes to “please remove all causation verbiage” from
their reports — meaning to not write what caused damage.

Make “sure to not opine to the causation to the damage to the roof tile,” read
one directive. “State what you saw … and an engineer will determine the
causation,” said another. Despite pushback from adjusters in the notes, one
final report reflected the changes made by UPC, slicing a $60,000 roof estimate
down to about $3,000, according to files seen by The Post.

While desk adjusters are ultimately the decision-makers, field adjusters not
documenting the damage or cause of loss goes against UPC’s own claim policies,
which say they are responsible for “providing cause of loss assessments,”
according to copies of the policies obtained by The Post.

“It was sickening what they would do to not spend money,” said Piscitelli, who
quit independent adjusting after his stint at UPC. “It still bothers me to this
day what they made us do.”



In July 2021, Rod Buvens, another independent adjuster who worked on Irma claims
and a 2019 wind event, reached out to Florida’s top regulator: Chief Financial
Officer Jimmy Patronis.

In an email obtained by The Post, Buvens wrote that he “saw firsthand the waste,
misuse of premium dollars,” as well as mismanagement and mistreatment of
policyholders, and asked for the state to follow up “on the numerous UPC
complaints that have been filed.”

“It would seem that prudent, preventive action could be taken by your Department
to prevent yet another Insurer from declaring insolvency,” he wrote.

Patronis never responded, he said. The Department of Financial Services, which
Patronis oversees, said that it looked into Buvens’s allegations in 2021 but
closed the probe due to his “lack of cooperation” for an interview. The adjuster
rejected that claim, saying he was living in Texas and couldn’t go to Florida on
the proposed dates due to previous commitments, and offered to do a virtual
interview. His multiple follow-up emails to the office went unanswered, he said.

“I simply wanted Jimmy Patronis and the DFS to do their job that they were
elected to do,” Buvens said in an interview. “Investigate the executives of this
insurance company to prevent them from continuing to prey on the policyholders
and property owners in Florida.”

That same month, the American Policyholder Association, a nonprofit watchdog
with a consumer protection unit led by a former prosecutor, sent two complaints
to regulators alleging that UPC altered claims and told adjusters to “zero out”
damage. The complaints were sent to the Office of Insurance Regulation, which
regulates carriers, and the Department of Financial Services, which investigates
allegations of wrongdoing. The letters, reviewed by The Post, contained
depositions, phone interview transcripts, estimates, engineer reports and
emails.

For months, officials at the two agencies punted the evidence back and forth,
according to the emails obtained by The Post spanning from 2021 to right before
Ian hit last year. In one part of the exchange, at the end of January 2022, a
Department of Financial Services investigator confirmed that the agency had
received the evidence months ago, but thought the Office of Insurance Regulation
should handle it. Five months later, in June, the watchdog checked in. This
time, an Office of Insurance Regulation official said the Department of
Financial Services should handle it, only to receive a response from the
Department of Financial Services that they’d already discussed the situation:

“If you recall, we spoke several weeks ago about this same referral and it was
decided OIR would initially look into the allegations,” according to the email,
which The Post obtained from the policyholder association.

The email exchange went dead. The Office of Insurance Regulation said it did not
get involved because it had already been monitoring the company for other
reasons.

A few weeks later, Ian pummeled southwest Florida.

“You can’t help but wonder if they had done a legitimate job investigating UPC
and enforced the law back in 2021,” said Doug Quinn, executive director of the
APA. “Then perhaps many of these Ian victims wouldn’t be suffering the way they
are.”

In a statement, Devin Galetta, communications director for Patronis and the
Florida Department of Financial Services, said the agency “takes all allegations
of insurance fraud seriously and investigates fraud tips as prescribed by
Florida Law.” He said it is standard practice for the Office of Insurance
Regulation to investigate allegations and refer them to DFS if criminal conduct
is suspected.



UPC, like many other Florida carriers, was part of a web of affiliated companies
under a larger firm. Its parent company, United, had 14 subsidiaries — which
include other insurers, holding companies, legal, technology and claims
services, reinsurers and managing general agents, who write policies and
negotiate contracts. Reinsurers and managing general agents are key cogs in the
insurance system, and provide a lot of support in exchange for big fees and
commissions.

Critics say this system can allow companies to move around money without
adequate scrutiny. Florida is one of the few states that does not require
insurers to use an external managing agent, Friedlander said.

From 2018 to 2021, for example, UPC — which at times pooled its finances with a
sister carrier — earned about $1.2 billion from people’s premiums after paying
its reinsurers. It then paid $884 million to its own managing agent for
services, according to the company’s audited reports and financial filings,
which Birnbaum reviewed.

“The MGA gets paid even if the overall insurance transaction loses a ton of
money,” said Birnbaum, of the Center for Economic Justice.

Peed and his wife pulled in about $21 million in dividends from 2017 until the
end of 2021, corporate filings show. Other top executives were also raking in
cash payments when UPC was falling apart. A total of $50 million in dividends
was paid out during this period.

Advertisement

Story continues below advertisement



In August 2022, UPC’s financial situation became concerning for Demotech, the
credit rating agency, and it decided to exit the state, a gradual process known
as “runoff” where it would not take on new business. Then Ian hit, and costly
claims poured in. Still, UPC attested to the state that it was in good enough
financial shape to cover claims with the help of reinsurance, money from its
parent company and other sources, according to regulatory documents. Regulators
said the plan was “reasonable” and approved it, while also limiting the fees UPC
could pay to its managing agent.

Two months later, UPC went under. In their insolvency report, regulators
primarily blamed insufficient reserves, losses on underwriting and bad weather.

United, its parent company, is now saying its move out of Florida home insurance
will yield benefits.

In a presentation to investors in June, United, which changed its name in recent
weeks to its profitable commercial insurer American Coastal Insurance Corp. as
part of a rebrand, explained how ditching UPC would lead to a “significant gain”
for 2023. So far, that seems to be the case: United’s stock price has climbed
from as low as 29 cents per share in December to $5.45 as of Thursday.

Walking around the construction site that’s still his home, Michael Derosa, a
recently retired dentist from Ohio, blames UPC’s executives and Florida’s
“business model” for the frustrating limbo that he’s in.

Ian’s gusts lifted the roof of his Punta Gorda home and damaged his kitchen.
Cracks now zigzag across the ceiling. And when it rains, as it did on June 21,
water still pours out of the electrical sockets, staining the white walls. UPC
had sent him $5,600 to fix everything. It cost him $180,000 — nearly all of his
family’s savings — to put in new insulation, drywall, flooring and other repairs
so he can try to get insurance before another hurricane strikes.

After 43 years of working, the 64-year-old planned to spend much of his
retirement on his canal-front deck. He thought he’d budgeted for everything,
even a major storm, because, “I thought I had a guarantee of protection from my
insurance company,” he said.

That was before last May, when he discovered that his Florida home had actually
been uninsured for three months. Before it collapsed, UPC had sent his one-page
policy cancellation notice there instead of his primary address in Ohio.

Now, Derosa says, no other carrier will take him on because of his home’s
condition or are requiring him to have contracts in place for the extensive
repairs. Most of the contractors demanded 50 percent of the cost up front.

“These guys know what they are doing,” he said. “They know the scam they are
running, and they know they can get away with it. That’s where we need our
politicians to step up and do something.”

Advertisement

Story continues below advertisement



He’s currently waiting for a determination from the state’s guaranty association
on what they’ll give him for the damage. Whenever he gets it, he says his home
is going on the market. It’s a tough decision, but what “if I get another
carrier, what if they do the same damn thing?” he asked. “Paying these high
premiums and run that risk? Who can afford that?”

On that same June afternoon, sitting in his hot, dusty, boxed-up living room 20
minutes away, Ed Raggie wondered the same thing. He’s too exhausted to go
through this again, he said, pointing to his exposed rafters, where he recently
pulled out insulation so wet it was still dripping.



His wife, Joanne, is back in the hospital because of health issues from stress
and a bad car accident the couple was in near their son’s house a few months
ago. Last week, doctors had to amputate both of her feet. He tries not to blame
it on their situation, on UPC. If they hadn’t still been living there — he stops
himself. That kind of thinking won’t do him any good.

Instead he thinks about what’s next. At nearly 70, he’s figuring out how to
start over. Whenever the state settles his claim — it’s been nearly 100 days —
he wants to put everything he can fit into their Subaru Forester and “get far
away from this place.” When asked where they’ll go, he sighs.

He has no idea.

Emmanuel Martinez contributed to this report.


MORE ON CLIMATE CHANGE

Understanding our climate: Global warming is a real phenomenon, and weather
disasters are undeniably linked to it. As temperatures rise, heat waves are more
often sweeping the globe — and parts of the world are becoming too hot to
survive.

What can be done? The Post is tracking a variety of climate solutions, as well
as the Biden administration’s actions on environmental issues. It can feel
overwhelming facing the impacts of climate change, but there are ways to cope
with climate anxiety.

Inventive solutions: Some people have built off-the-grid homes from trash to
stand up to a changing climate. As seas rise, others are exploring how to
harness marine energy.

What about your role in climate change? Our climate coach Michael J. Coren is
answering questions about environmental choices in our everyday lives. Submit
yours here. You can also sign up for our Climate Coach newsletter.


Share
5534 Comments
Climate change and global warming
HAND CURATED
 * Biden says ‘practically speaking’ he’s already declared a climate emergency
   August 9, 2023
   
   
   Biden says ‘practically speaking’ he’s already declared a climate emergency
   August 9, 2023
 * See how a quick-fix climate solution could also trigger war
   May 3, 2023
   
   
   See how a quick-fix climate solution could also trigger war
   May 3, 2023
 * We looked at 1,200 possibilities for the planet’s future. These are our best
   hope.
   May 22, 2023
   
   
   We looked at 1,200 possibilities for the planet’s future. These are our best
   hope.
   May 22, 2023

View 3 more stories

Loading...

Subscribe to comment and get the full experience.Choose your plan →


View more

Loading...
Company
About The Post Newsroom Policies & Standards Diversity and Inclusion Careers
Media & Community Relations WP Creative Group Accessibility Statement
Get The Post
Become a Subscriber Gift Subscriptions Mobile & Apps Newsletters & Alerts
Washington Post Live Reprints & Permissions Post Store Books & E-Books Newspaper
in Education Print Archives (Subscribers Only) Today’s Paper Public Notices
Coupons
Contact Us
Contact the Newsroom Contact Customer Care Contact the Opinions team Advertise
Licensing & Syndication Request a Correction Send a News Tip Report a
Vulnerability
Terms of Use
Digital Products Terms of Sale Print Products Terms of Sale Terms of Service
Privacy Policy Cookie Settings Submissions & Discussion Policy RSS Terms of
Service Ad Choices
washingtonpost.com © 1996-2023 The Washington Post
 * washingtonpost.com
 * © 1996-2023 The Washington Post
 * About The Post
 * Contact the Newsroom
 * Contact Customer Care
 * Request a Correction
 * Send a News Tip
 * Report a Vulnerability
 * Download the Washington Post App
 * Policies & Standards
 * Terms of Service
 * Privacy Policy
 * Cookie Settings
 * Print Products Terms of Sale
 * Digital Products Terms of Sale
 * Submissions & Discussion Policy
 * RSS Terms of Service
 * Ad Choices
 * Coupons