osf.io Open in urlscan Pro
35.190.84.173  Public Scan

Form analysis
0 forms found in the DOM

Text Content

For full functionality of this site it is necessary to enable JavaScript. Here
are instructions for enabling JavaScript in your web browser.



OSF PREPRINTS
 * OSFHOME
 * OSFPREPRINTS
 * OSFREGISTRIES
 * OSFMEETINGS
 * OSFINSTITUTIONS

 * Add a Preprint
 * Search
 * Support
 * Donate
 * Sign Up Sign In

x Notice: The site will undergo maintenance between Feb 7, 2022 7:59 PM and Feb
7, 2022 7:59 PM (+0000 UTC). Thank you for your patience.


SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS COMMUNICATION ABOUT CONTESTED SCIENCE: A PREREGISTERED
META-ANALYSIS



AUTHORS
 * AART VAN STEKELENBURG
 * GABI SCHAAP
 * HARM VELING
 * JONATHAN VAN 'T RIET
 * MONIEK BUIJZEN


MA_cons_comm_preprint.pdf
Version: 1


Version: 1
Created: February 07, 2022 | Last edited: February 07, 2022
Download preprint
Downloads: 3


ABSTRACT

Scientific consensus communication is among the most promising interventions to
minimize the gap between experts’ and the public’s belief in scientific facts.
There is, however, discussion about its effectiveness in changing consensus
perceptions and beliefs about contested science topics. This preregistered
meta-analysis assessed the effects of

See more

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS

osf.io/9gnkc/

PREPRINT DOI

10.31219/osf.io/etsrw

DOIs are minted by a third party, and may take up to 24 hours to be registered.

LICENSE

CC-By Attribution 4.0 International

DISCIPLINES

Social and Behavioral Sciences Communication Psychology Social Psychology

TAGS

belief climate change genetically modified food meta-analysis open data
preregistration science communication scientific consensus scientific facts
vaccination

CITATIONS

APA
van Stekelenburg, A., Schaap, G., Veling, H., Van 't Riet, J., & Buijzen, M.
(2022, February 7). Scientific consensus communication about contested science:
A preregistered meta-analysis. Retrieved from osf.io/etsrw
MLA
van Stekelenburg, Aart, et al. “Scientific Consensus Communication About
Contested Science: A Preregistered Meta-analysis.” OSF Preprints, 7 Feb. 2022.
Web.
Chicago
van Stekelenburg, Aart, Gabi Schaap, Harm Veling, Jonathan Van 't Riet, and
Moniek Buijzen. 2022. “Scientific Consensus Communication About Contested
Science: A Preregistered Meta-analysis.” OSF Preprints. February 7.
osf.io/etsrw.

Get more citations

Enter citation style (e.g., "APA")

This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By
clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information,
see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.
Accept

OSF

 * Explore
 * Contact
 * FAQ/Guides
 * API
 * Source Code

CENTER FOR OPEN SCIENCE

 * Home
 * Reproducibility Project: Psychology
 * Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology
 * TOP Guidelines
 * Donate

SOCIALIZE

Copyright © 2011-2022 Center for Open Science | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy