www.nytimes.com
Open in
urlscan Pro
151.101.65.164
Public Scan
URL:
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/14/us/border-senate-schumer.html
Submission Tags: democrat democrats republican republicans progressives progressive election politics political vote Search All
Submission: On February 14 via manual from US — Scanned from US
Submission Tags: democrat democrats republican republicans progressives progressive election politics political vote Search All
Submission: On February 14 via manual from US — Scanned from US
Form analysis 2 forms found in the DOM
POST https://nytimes.app.goo.gl/?link=https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/14/us/border-senate-schumer.html&apn=com.nytimes.android&amv=9837&ibi=com.nytimes.NYTimes&isi=284862083
<form method="post" action="https://nytimes.app.goo.gl/?link=https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/14/us/border-senate-schumer.html&apn=com.nytimes.android&amv=9837&ibi=com.nytimes.NYTimes&isi=284862083" data-testid="MagicLinkForm"
style="visibility: hidden;"><input name="client_id" type="hidden" value="web.fwk.vi"><input name="redirect_uri" type="hidden"
value="https://nytimes.app.goo.gl/?link=https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/14/us/border-senate-schumer.html&apn=com.nytimes.android&amv=9837&ibi=com.nytimes.NYTimes&isi=284862083"><input name="response_type" type="hidden"
value="code"><input name="state" type="hidden" value="no-state"><input name="scope" type="hidden" value="default"></form>POST https://nytimes.app.goo.gl/?link=https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/14/us/border-senate-schumer.html&apn=com.nytimes.android&amv=9837&ibi=com.nytimes.NYTimes&isi=284862083
<form method="post" action="https://nytimes.app.goo.gl/?link=https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/14/us/border-senate-schumer.html&apn=com.nytimes.android&amv=9837&ibi=com.nytimes.NYTimes&isi=284862083" data-testid="MagicLinkForm"
style="visibility: hidden;"><input name="client_id" type="hidden" value="web.fwk.vi"><input name="redirect_uri" type="hidden"
value="https://nytimes.app.goo.gl/?link=https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/14/us/border-senate-schumer.html&apn=com.nytimes.android&amv=9837&ibi=com.nytimes.NYTimes&isi=284862083"><input name="response_type" type="hidden"
value="code"><input name="state" type="hidden" value="no-state"><input name="scope" type="hidden" value="default"></form>Text Content
Skip to contentSkip to site index Search & Section Navigation Section Navigation SEARCH U.S. SUBSCRIBE FOR $1/WEEKLog in Wednesday, February 14, 2024 Today’s Paper SUBSCRIBE FOR $1/WEEK U.S. Congress * House Impeaches Mayorkas * Ukraine and Israel Aid * How the Senate Is Changing * Mike Johnson Stumbles * G.O.P. Sinks Border Deal Advertisement SKIP ADVERTISEMENT Supported by SKIP ADVERTISEMENT HOW SENATE DEMOCRATS FLIPPED THE BORDER ISSUE ON REPUBLICANS Senator Chuck Schumer was wary of tying immigration policy to emergency aid for Ukraine, but he saw an opening to address border turmoil that was becoming a political liability — and to call Republicans’ bluff. * Share full article * * * 53 * Read in app Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, the majority leader, worked with Republicans to connect a border deal with funding for Ukraine.Credit...Kent Nishimura for The New York Times By Carl Hulse Reporting from Capitol Hill Feb. 14, 2024Updated 12:51 p.m. ET Sign up for Your Places: Global Update. All the latest news for any part of the world you select. Get it sent to your inbox. As senators gathered on the floor for a typical Monday night vote at the end of October, Senator Mitch McConnell, the Kentucky Republican and minority leader, approached Senator Chuck Schumer, his Democratic counterpart, with some unsettling news: Border security was going to have to be part of any package to free up endangered assistance for Ukraine. To Mr. Schumer of New York, the majority leader, the ultimatum revived unpleasant memories of his participation in difficult immigration negotiations in 2013 that yielded a compromise, only to collapse despite strong bipartisan support in the Senate. But saying no could doom the Ukraine aid and leave Democrats holding the bag. He and his staff grappled with the problem for a week, then gathered for a conference call on Sunday, Nov. 5. A bold new approach took hold. “We had an epiphany — sort of, lightning strikes,” Mr. Schumer recalled in an interview. “Do border. If we did it right and were tough about it, it’s a win for us. And it helps us with Ukraine because so many of our people care about Ukraine, they will vote for a good border bill.” The abrupt change in conventional Democratic thinking had profound significance for the ensuing four months on Capitol Hill. It touched off a circuitous series of events — including some near-death experiences — that paved the way for the Senate’s approval early Tuesday of $95 billion in aid to Ukraine, Israel and U.S. allies in the Indo-Pacific. The final package notably did not contain new border security provisions, after Senate conservatives opted to kill that element of the legislation despite their initial insistence that it be included. Advertisement SKIP ADVERTISEMENT The tanking of the immigration proposal, hammered out over weeks of talks between the designees of Mr. Schumer and Mr. McConnell, ultimately cleared the way for passage of the foreign aid bill. Enough Republicans — 22 in the end — were unwilling to desert Ukraine, and many of them believed that Mr. Schumer and his fellow Democrats had made a good-faith effort to strike a border security deal that was sabotaged by members of their own party. Image Senate Republicans, including Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the minority leader, did not vote for the legislation.Credit...Anna Rose Layden for The New York Times Subscribe to The Times to read as many articles as you like. Carl Hulse is the chief Washington correspondent, primarily writing about Congress and national political races and issues. He has nearly four decades of experience reporting in the nation’s capital. More about Carl Hulse Read 53 Comments * Share full article * * * 53 * Read in app Advertisement SKIP ADVERTISEMENT COMMENTS 53 How Senate Democrats Flipped the Border Issue on RepublicansSkip to Comments Share your thoughts. The Times needs your voice. We welcome your on-topic commentary, criticism and expertise. Comments are moderated for civility. SITE INDEX SITE INFORMATION NAVIGATION * © 2024 The New York Times Company * NYTCo * Contact Us * Accessibility * Work with us * Advertise * T Brand Studio * Your Ad Choices * Privacy Policy * Terms of Service * Terms of Sale * Site Map * Canada * International * Help * Subscriptions KEEP READING THE TIMES BY CREATING A FREE ACCOUNT OR LOGGING IN. Continue Enjoy unlimited access to all of The Times. See subscription options