psikologimarketing.com
Open in
urlscan Pro
185.237.145.147
Public Scan
Submitted URL: http://psikologimarketing.com/
Effective URL: https://psikologimarketing.com/
Submission: On March 31 via api from BY — Scanned from SG
Effective URL: https://psikologimarketing.com/
Submission: On March 31 via api from BY — Scanned from SG
Form analysis
0 forms found in the DOMText Content
INI HARI TERAKHIR KAMU TEBAK-TEBAKAN DALAM TAKTIK BISNIS Persembahan 50+ Hasil Penilitan tentang Perilaku Konsumen untuk Kamu yang 'gak pengen di situ-situ aja : Setelah Melahap Ilmu Dagingnya Kamu Akan Bisa Menjawab: BAGAIMANA CARA MEMILIH ANGKA YANG TEPAT UNTUK HARGA PRODUK ANDA? APAKAH DENGAN ANGKA 9/7/5/0? KAPAN MENULIS DISKON PAKAI "%" KAPAN PAKAI "RP"? BAGAIMANA CARA MENULIS BIAYA TAMBAHAN SHIPPING & HANDLING? BERAPA UKURAN FONT YANG OPTIMAL UNTUK HARGA ASLI VS HARGA DISKON? APA POSISI TERBAIK UNTUK MELETAKAN HARGA DISKON? SETELAH HARGA ASLI YANG DI CORET ATAU JUSTRU SEBELUMNYA? BAGAIMANA STRATEGI MELABELI HARGA BARANG MEWAH VS BARANG MURAH ? BAGAIMANA MENGURUTKAN LIST HARGA DI KATALOG/MENU RESTORAN/SUSUNAN ETALASE? APAKAH DARI MAHAL KE MURAH ATAU SEBALIKNYA? BAGAIMANA TEHNIK MEMECAH SATUAN UNIT HARGA YANG TERASA RINGAN DI MATA CALON PEMBELI BAGAIMANA MEMILIH WARNA TOMBOL CTA YANG TEPAT SESUAI TEMA WEBSITE? MENGAPA EMPTY SPACE DI SEKITAR TOMBOL CTA SANGAT KRUSIAL? BAGAIMANA MENDESAIN STYLE TOMBOL CTA YANG MENINGKATKAN KLIK? APA PENGARUH SIMBOL ANAK PANAH DI DALAM WEBSITE? BAGAIMANA PENGARUH TATAPAN MATA MODEL IKLAN KEPADA TINGKAT PENJUALAN? BERAPA KALI SEBAIKNYA TOMBOL CTA DI ULANG KEMUNCULANNYA DI WEBSITE? MANAKAH KATA GANTI ORANG YANG TEPAT (ORANG PERTAMA, KEDUA, ATAU KETIGA)? MANAKAH FORM YANG LEBIH EFEKTIF ANTARA OPT-IN VS OPT-OUT ? BAGAIMANA MENERAPKAN LIMITASI & SCARCITY ? MANAKAH SIMBOL "TRUSTED" TERBAIK YANG MENINGKATKAN KEPERCAYAAN CUSTOMER? BAGAIMANA MENDESAIN HALAMAN CHECKOUT YANG TINGGI KONVERSI? BAGAIMANA MEMBUAT ORANG MERASA RUGI BESAR JIKA TIDAK MEM-VIRAL-KAN PRODUK ANDA? DAN MAAAASIH BANYAK LAGI... Lihat Member Area SEMUA MATERI DISAJIKAN BERDASARKAN FAKTA (BUKAN OPINI) PENELITIAN DARI: JOURNAL INTERNASIONAL SENILAI RP7.672.000 Reference (silahkan klik) 1. Anderson, E. T., & Simester, D. I. (2003). Effects of $9 price endings on retail sales: Evidence from field experiments. Quantitative marketing and Economics, 1(1), 93-110. 2. Ariely, D. (2008). Predictably irrational. New York: HarperCollins. 3. Ariely, D., & Wallsten, T. S. (1995). Seeking subjective dominance in multidimensional space: An explanation of the asymmetric dominance effect. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63(3), 223-232. 4. Bambauer-Sachse, S., & Grewal, D. (2011). Temporal reframing of prices: When is it beneficial?. Journal of Retailing, 87(2), 156-165. 5. Biswas, A., Bhowmick, S., Guha, A., & Grewal, D. (2013). Consumer evaluations of sale prices: role of the subtraction principle. Journal of Marketing, 77(4), 49-66. 6. Bizer, G. Y., & Schindler, R. M. (2005). Direct evidence of ending-digit drop-off in price information processing. Psychology and Marketing, 22(10), 771. 7. Burman, B., & Biswas, A. (2007). Partitioned pricing: Can we always divide and prosper?. Journal of Retailing, 83(4), 423-436. 8. Carlson, J. P., & Weathers, D. (2008). Examining differences in consumer reactions to partitioned prices with a variable number of price components. Journal of Business Research, 61(7), 724-731. 9. Chakravarti, D., Krish, R., Paul, P., & Srivastava, J. (2002). Partitioned presentation of multicomponent bundle prices: Evaluation, choice and underlying processing effects. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(3), 215-229. 10. Chandrashekaran, R., & Grewal, D. (2006). Anchoring effects of advertised reference price and sale price: the moderating role of saving presentation format. Journal of Business Research, 59(10), 1063-1071. 11. Chen, S. F. S., Monroe, K. B., & Lou, Y. C. (1998). The effects of framing price promotion messages on consumers’ perceptions and purchase intentions. Journal of retailing, 74(3), 353-372. 12. Choi, P., & Coulter, K. S. (2012). It’s not all relative: the effects of mental and physical positioning of comparative prices on absolute versus relative discount assessment. Journal of Retailing, 88(4), 512-527. 13. Choi, J., Lee, K., & Ji, Y. (2012). What type of framing message is more appropriate with nine-ending pricing? Marketing Letters, 23(3), 603-614. 14. Coulter, K. S., & Coulter, R. A. (2005). Size does matter: The effects of magnitude representation congruency on price perceptions and purchase likelihood. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(1), 64-76. 15. Coulter, K. S., & Coulter, R. A. (2007). Distortion of price discount perceptions: The right digit effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(2), 162-173. 16. Coulter, K. S., & Grewal, D. (2014). Name-letters and birthday-numbers: Implicit egotism effects in pricing. Journal of Marketing, 78(3), 102-120. 17. Coulter, K. S., & Norberg, P. A. (2009). The effects of physical distance between regular and sale prices on numerical difference perceptions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(2), 144-157. 18. Coulter, K. S., Choi, P., & Monroe, K. B. (2012). Comma ‘N’ cents in pricing: The effects of auditory representation encoding on price magnitude perceptions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 395-407. 19. Gendall, P., Fox, M. F., & Wilton, P. (1998). Estimating the effect of odd pricing. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 7(5), 421-432. 20. Gourville, J. T. (1999). The effect of implicit versus explicit comparisons on temporal pricing claims. Marketing Letters, 10(2), 113-124. 21. Grewal, D., Marmorstein, H., & Sharma, A. (1996). Communicating price information through semantic cues: The moderating effects of situation and discount size. Journal of Consumer Research, 148-155. 22. Huber, J., Payne, JW., Puto, C. (1982). Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: Violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis. Journal of consumer research, 9(1), 90-98. 23. Jeffrey Inman, J., Peter, A. C., & Raghubir, P. (1997). Framing the deal: The role of restrictions in accentuating deal value. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(1), 68-79. 24. Josiam, B. M., & Hobson, J. P. (1995). Consumer choice in context: The decoy effect in travel and tourism. Journal of Travel Research, 34(1), 45-50. 25. Kim, H. M. (2006). The effect of salience on mental accounting: How integration versus segregation of payment influences purchase decisions. Journal of behavioral decision making, 19(4), 381-391. 26. Kim, H. M., & Kramer, T. (2006). The moderating effects of need for cognition and cognitive effort on responses to multi-dimensional prices. Marketing Letters, 17(3), 193-203. 27. Kim, M. H., & Kachersky, L. (2006). Dimensions of price salience: a conceptual framework for perceptions of multi-dimensional prices. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 15(2), 139-147. 28. Larson, R. B. (2014). Psychological pricing principles for organizations with market power. Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 16(1), 11-25. 29. Lee, Y. H., & Han, C. Y. (2002). Partitioned pricing in advertising: Effects on brand and retailer attitudes. Marketing Letters, 13(1), 27-40. 30. Lewis, M., Singh, V., & Fay, S. (2006). An empirical study of the impact of nonlinear shipping and handling fees on purchase incidence and expenditure decisions. Marketing Science, 25(1), 51-64. 31. Lowry, J. R., Charles, T. A., & Lane, J. A. (2005). A comparison of perceived value between a percentage markdown and a monetary markdown. Marketing Management Journal, 15(1), 140-148. 32. Mishra, H., Mishra, A., & Nayakankuppam, D. (2006). Money: A bias for the whole. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(4), 541-549. 33. Mogilner, C., & Aaker, J. (2009). “The time vs. money effect”: Shifting product attitudes and decisions through personal connection. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(2), 277-291. 34. Morwitz, V., Greenleaf, E., & Johnson, E. J. (1998). Divide and prosper: consumers’ reaction to partitioned prices. Journal of Marketing Research, 35, 453-463. 35. Müller, H., Kroll, E. B., & Vogt, B. (2012). Do real payments really matter? A re-examination of the compromise effect in hypothetical and binding choice settings. Marketing Letters, 23(1), 73-92. 36. Nunes, J. C., & Boatwright, P. (2004). Incidental prices and their effect on willingness to pay. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(4), 457-466. 37. Pechtl, H. (2009). Value structures in a decoy and compromise effect experiment. Psychology & Marketing, 26(8), 736-759. 38. Puccinelli, N. M., Chandrashekaran, R., Grewal, D., & Suri, R. (2013). Are men seduced by red? The effect of red versus black prices on price perceptions. Journal of Retailing, 89(2), 115-125. 39. Raghubir, P., & Srivastava, J. (2009). The denomination effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(4), 701-713. 40. Schindler, R. M. (2006). The 99 price ending as a signal of a low-price appeal. Journal of Retailing, 82(1), 71-77. 41. Schindler, R. M., & Kibarian, T. M. (1993). Testing for perceptual underestimation of 9-ending prices. Advances in Consumer Research, 20(1), 580-585. 42. Schindler, R. M., & Kibarian, T. M. (1996). Increased consumer sales response though use of 99-ending prices. Journal of Retailing, 72(2), 187-199. 43. Schindler, R. M., & Kibarian, T. M. (2001). Image communicated by the use of 99 endings in advertised prices. Journal of Advertising, 30(4), 95-99. 44. Sheng, S., Bao, Y., & Pan, Y. (2007). Partitioning or bundling? Perceived fairness of the surcharge makes a difference. Psychology & Marketing, 24(12), 1025-1041. 45. Simonson, I., & Tversky, A. (1992). Choice in context: Tradeoff contrast and extremeness aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(3), 281. 46. Suk, K., Lee, J., & Lichtenstein, D. R. (2012). The influence of price presentation order on consumer choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(5), 708-717. 47. Thomas, M., & Morwitz, V. (2005). Penny wise and pound foolish: The left-digit effect in price cognition. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(1), 54-64. 48. Thomas, M., Simon, D. H., & Kadiyali, V. (2010). The price precision effect: Evidence from laboratory and market data. Marketing Science, 29(1), 175-190. 49. Van Rompay, T. J., de Vries, P. W., Bontekoe, F., & Tanja‐Dijkstra, K. (2012). Embodied product perception: Effects of verticality cues in advertising and packaging design on consumer impressions and price expectations. Psychology & marketing, 29(12), 919-928. 50. Wadhwa, M., & Zhang, K. (2015). This number just feels right: The impact of roundedness of price numbers on product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(5), 1172-1185. 51. Wansink, B., Kent, R. J., & Hoch, S. (1998). An anchoring and adjustment model of purchase quantity decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 1998, 71-81. 52. Xia, L., & Monroe, K. B. (2004). Price partitioning on the internet. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(4), 63-73. 53. dan Penelitian lain yang terus di Update Dikemas Dalam Platform yang Rapih dan Responsif di Semua Perangkat : Desktop Mobile INVESTASI LEHER KE ATAS: 00 Hari 23 Jam 59 Menit 54 Detik AIO COURSE BUNDLE Rp 2.100.000 RP 497 .000 * Kode Kupon: "PREMIUM" * Psychology of Pricing (35+ Materi) * Psychology of Conversion Optimization (25+ Materi) * Sekali bayar saja * FREE UPDATE Langsung Akses Garansi 14 hari uang kembali Best Investment VERIFIED BY: Apa Kata Mereka? Christina Lie -Founder & CEO dari 101Red -Mengelola ribuan reseller Nofi Bayu Dharmawan -Pemenang Local Heroes Liputan 6 Awards 2018 Kategori Inovasi- -Founder InsightZilla- -Founder Zillatics- -Founder Kampung Marketer- -Silahkan klik untuk zoom- Klik untuk lihat testimoni lengkapnya ADA PERTANYAAN? Chat Whatsapp Chat Facebook FAQ FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Ini produk apa ya? Produk Digital berupa Online Course tentang Psikologi Marketing yang dibahas berdasarkan temuan ilmiah dari jurnal internasional (bukan opini). Apa saja yang akan saya pelajari? Anda akan mempelajari >60 unit materi berupa video maupun tulisan tentang psikologi marketing, sejauh ini sudah ada 2 kelas besar yaitu Psychology of Pricing (hasil penelitian tentang cara efektif menampilkan harga produk) dan Psychology of Conversion Optimization (hasil penelitian tentang strategi desain website yang tinggi konversi). Materi akan terus bertambah seiring temuan jurnal terbaru. Mengapa saya bisa mempercayai ilmu ini ? Semua materi di Psikologimarketing.com tidak ada yang berlandaskan kepada OPINI, melainkan hasil penelitian, survey, dan split test, dari para researcher luar dan dalam negeri yang bergelut di dunia marketing. Terdapat >57 Jurnal Internasional berbayar yang dikupas dalam tiap-tiap materi. Sebagian besar diantaranya berasal dari:American Marketing AssociationJournal Product & Brand ManagementJournal of Research in MarketingJournal of Applied Business ResearchJournal of Consumer ResearchJournal of MarketingMarketing Management JournalJournal of Marketing ResearchMarketing Management AssociationJournal of Marketing SciencePsychology & MarketingOrganizational Behaviour and Human Decision ProcessesJournal of RetailingJournal of Consumer Psychology Apakah ada garansi uang kembali? Jika Anda memiliki masalah teknis saat menggunakan platform online course dan kami gagal membantu menyelesaikan masalah tersebut, dalam jangka waktu 14 hari kami akan mengembalikan uang anda 100%. Jaminan uang kembali hanya berlaku untuk masalah teknis saja, selain itu, semua penjualan bersifat final. CREATED BY: YUDHA FEBRIAN MEDICAL DOCTOR PSYCHOLOGY ENTHUSIAST CEO OF QODRBEE SOFTWARE HOUSE FOUNDER OF PSIKOLOGIMARKETING.COM MARKETING STRATEGIST OF THE EDWIN GUEST HOUSE YOGYAKARTA FOUNDER OF WOO-WA.COM * yudha@psikologimarketing.com * 0859-7456-8372 * Yogyakarta "What is the best investment you have ever done, Sir ?" "INVEST IN YOURSELF, IS THE BEST INVESTMENT YOU CAN POSSIBLY MAKE." * Materi * Harga * Testimoni * FAQ WARRENT BUFFET - 2ND RICHEST MAN IN THE WORLD 2017 - THE MOST SUCCESSFUL INVESTOR OF THE 20TH CENTURY BY TIME MAGAZINE 00 Hari 23 Jam 59 Menit 55 Detik Ambil Diskon 76% Sekarang Hari Jam Menit Detik Ambil Diskon 76% Sekarang