local-government-law.11kbw.com
Open in
urlscan Pro
162.159.134.42
Public Scan
URL:
https://local-government-law.11kbw.com/
Submission: On August 16 via automatic, source certstream-suspicious — Scanned from IT
Submission: On August 16 via automatic, source certstream-suspicious — Scanned from IT
Form analysis
2 forms found in the DOMGET https://local-government-law.11kbw.com/
<form role="search" method="get" id="searchform" class="searchform" action="https://local-government-law.11kbw.com/">
<div>
<label class="screen-reader-text" for="s">Search for:</label>
<input type="text" value="" name="s" id="s">
<input type="submit" id="searchsubmit" value="Search">
</div>
</form>
Name: mc-embedded-subscribe-form — POST https://11kbw.us18.list-manage.com/subscribe/post?u=f0344b509a7abb77d9c3b010e&id=313be788cd
<form action="https://11kbw.us18.list-manage.com/subscribe/post?u=f0344b509a7abb77d9c3b010e&id=313be788cd" method="post" id="mc-embedded-subscribe-form" name="mc-embedded-subscribe-form" class="validate" target="_blank" novalidate="novalidate">
<div id="mc_embed_signup_scroll">
<div class="indicates-required"><span class="asterisk">*</span> indicates required</div>
<div class="mc-field-group">
<label for="mce-EMAIL">Email <span class="asterisk">*</span>
</label>
<input type="email" value="" name="EMAIL" class="required email" id="mce-EMAIL" aria-required="true">
</div>
<div class="mc-field-group">
<label for="mce-FNAME">First name </label>
<input type="text" value="" name="FNAME" class="" id="mce-FNAME">
</div>
<div class="mc-field-group">
<label for="mce-LNAME">Last name </label>
<input type="text" value="" name="LNAME" class="" id="mce-LNAME">
</div>
<div id="mce-responses" class="clear">
<div class="response" id="mce-error-response" style="display:none"></div>
<div class="response" id="mce-success-response" style="display:none"></div>
</div> <!-- real people should not fill this in and expect good things - do not remove this or risk form bot signups-->
<div style="position: absolute; left: -5000px;" aria-hidden="true"><input type="text" name="b_f0344b509a7abb77d9c3b010e_313be788cd" tabindex="-1" value=""></div>
<div class="clear"><input type="submit" value="Subscribe" name="subscribe" id="mc-embedded-subscribe" class="button"></div>
</div>
</form>
Text Content
11KBW Local Government Law * Search for: * SUBSCRIBE Get an email when we publish a new post on this blog. We'll never share your email and you can unsubscribe any time. Our use of your details is explained in our privacy policy. * indicates required Email * First name Last name * HEADINGS * Best Value (13) * Capital Finance and Companies (54) * Council Tax and Rates (72) * Decision making and Contracts (257) * Elections and Bylaws (32) * Environment, Highways and Leisure (117) * General (17) * Housing (143) * Human Rights and Public Sector Equality Duty (103) * Judicial Control, Liability and Litigation (212) * Land, Goods and Services (72) * Local Authority Powers (73) * Non Judicial Control (20) * Planning and Environmental (144) * Social Care (72) * Standards (22) * DISCLAIMER This blog is maintained for information purposes only. It is not intended to be a source of legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. Blog posts reflect the views and opinions of their individual authors, not of chambers as a whole. STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS August 16th, 2024 by James Goudie KC in Local Authority Powers In AI Properties ( Sunderland ) Ltd v Tudor Studios ( 2024 ) UKSC 27, concerned with the consequence of failure to comply with a statutory requirement to serve a notice, the Supreme Court says that, where there is no express statement of the consequences of non-compliance, the correct approach is to consider the whole of the structure within which the requirement arises, and ask what consequences of non-compliance best fits the structure as a whole. In each case, the focus is on (1) the purpose served served by the requirement, as assessed in the light of a detailed analysis of the particular statute, and (2) the specific facts of the case, having regard to whether any and what prejudice might be caused or whether any injustice might arise if the validity of the statutory process is affirmed notwithstanding the breach of the procedural requirements. PENSIONS REVIEW August 16th, 2024 by James Goudie KC in Local Authority Powers Following the announcement by the Chancellor of a Pensions Review, terms of reference for PHASE ONE have been published. This includes consolidation and improved governance in the LGPS, and encouraging further pension investment into UK assets, as well as reform of defined contribution workplace schemes. DUTIES OF CANDOUR AND DISCLOSURE IN JUDICIAL REVIEW August 13th, 2024 by James Goudie KC in Judicial Control, Liability and Litigation IN PYANEANDEE v LEAN (2024) UKPC 27 Lady Simler observes at para 44 that , although there is a difference between the continuing duty of candour and the continuing duty of disclosure , the latter is often, in the broadest sense unnecessary, if the former duty is discharged to its fullest extent. RATEABLE OCCUPIER August 13th, 2024 by James Goudie KC in Council Tax and Rates In Z v MOORE (2024) UKUT 204 ( LC ) a business unit comprised both a warehouse and an office. It is held to be a single hereditament. The parts were not sef contained and were not severable. There was a single territorial block. The uunit was physically a single whole with a paramount occupier. PLANNING UNIT August 13th, 2024 by James Goudie KC in Planning and Environmental RICHMOND UPON THAMES LBC v ARIYO ( (2024) EWCA Civ 960 is concerned with the general principle of planning law that changes of use are generally judged by reference to the “ planning unit “. The planning unit , at least in general terms, is the whole of an area in single occupation used for a main purpose to which other purposes are ancillary. The concept of an ancillary use is also a well-established part of planning law; and where a change of use is permitted it will generally extend to land used as ancillary to the changed use, if part of the same planning unit. LOCAL AUTHORITIES AS TRUSTEES FOR CHARITIES August 9th, 2024 by James Goudie KC in Decision making and Contracts The Charity Commission has updated Guidance for Council Members and Officers when their Council is Trustee of a Charity. The Commission is seeing a “ significant number ‘ of cases where local authorities have failed to comply with their legal responsibilities a charity trustees. Common problems include changing the use or status of charitable land, or disposing of it, in a way that is not compatible with its charitable purpose. The Guidance states that (1) it is important that authorities understand which of the assets they manage or own are charitable, and (2) they should then ensure that they are familiar with the different legal requirements and legal restrictions on actions in relation to assets that are charitable rather than simply owned. The Guidance (1) outlines what is expected in the role of trustee, (2) gives advice on how to handle issues such as managing CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, (3) explains requirements in relation to filing Accounts, and (4) sets out rules around disposing of CHARITY LAND. MEMBERSHIP OF A COMPANY August 5th, 2024 by James Goudie KC in Capital Finance and Companies It is necessary for a person who contends that their name has been wrongly taken off the Register of Members of a company to apply to the Court for a Order that the Register be rectified, with retrospective effect, putting them back on the Register, in place of the name of the person whose namely wrongly appears on the Register. So held in BLAND v KEEGAN (2024) EWCA Civ 934. ECHR ARTICLE 6 August 5th, 2024 by James Goudie KC in Human Rights and Public Sector Equality Duty In QX v SSHD ( 2024 ) UKSC 26 a seven Justice Supreme Court emphasizes both Article 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights and the common law right to a fair trial. As regards the latter, at paragraph 53, the Court states that the “fundamental importance “ of the domestic right should not be disregarded. The object of ALL LEGAL PROCEEDINGS is to do justice according to law. Doing justice involves not only arriving at a just result but arriving at it in a JUST MANNER. The essential ingredients of a fair trial can vary according to the subject matter and the nature of the proceedings, but the right to a fair trial is fundamental under domestic law and does NOT depend on the categorisation of the rights or interests at stake in the proceedings as “ civil rights or obligations “ within the meaning of Article 6(1) of the ECHR. Read more » PROCUREMENT OF CONTRACTS August 2nd, 2024 by James Goudie KC in Decision making and Contracts The Cabinet Office has published Guidance under the Procurement Act 2023 on contract terminations; procurement oversight; contract award notices; standstills; assessment summaries; remedies; debarment; exclusions; and procurement termination notices. IMPROVEMENT NOTICE August 2nd, 2024 by lawrence in Housing CURD v LIVERPOOL CITY COUNCIL (2024) UKUT 218 (LC) concerned an Improvement Notice served under Section 12 of the Housing Act 2004. It is held that the FTT can vary an Improvement Notice only if it satisfied that a hazard exists. It cannot substitute a requirement for further investigation on the question of hazard in place of a requirement for specified remedial work. « Older Entries 11KBW, 11 King’s Bench Walk, Temple, London EC4Y 7EQ | Tel: 020 7632 8500 Privacy | Terms & Conditions | © 11KBW 2024