fivethirtyeight.com Open in urlscan Pro
192.0.66.240  Public Scan

Form analysis
1 forms found in the DOM

GET https://fivethirtyeight.com/

<form action="https://fivethirtyeight.com/" method="get" id="searchform" class="search-form">
  <label for="search-field" class="search-form-label">Search</label>
  <div class="search-form-input-wrapper"><input type="search" name="s" id="search-field" class="search-form-input" placeholder="Search" tabindex="-1"></div>
  <input type="submit" value="Search" class="search-form-submit" tabindex="-1">
  <button aria-label="Search" class="search-button" id="search-button" aria-expanded="false">
    <span class="visually-hidden">Search</span>
  </button>
</form>

Text Content

Skip to main content



FIVETHIRTYEIGHT

Search

Search
ABC News Menu
Politics
Why Trump’s Presence In The Midterms Is Risky For The GOP
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter
 * Politics
 * Sports
 * Science
 * Podcasts
 * Video
 * ABC News

2022 Election


WHY TRUMP'S PRESENCE IN THE MIDTERMS IS RISKY FOR THE GOP

By Nate Silver

Sep. 2, 2022, at 8:42 AM

 * Facebook
 * Twitter
 * Email
 * Copied!
 * 



ILLUSTRATION BY EMILY SCHERER

Upset Democratic special election wins in Alaska and New York over the past two
weeks are the latest sign that the political environment might be unusual for a
midterm election. Frankly, the results since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v.
Wade have looked more like 2018 than 2020, with Democrats competitive even in
red-leaning districts. That probably won’t hold. 

But even if it’s just a neutral year — as the generic congressional ballot
currently shows — Democrats would probably be pleased. It would likely be enough
for them to hold the Senate, and even gain a seat or two. It would even give
them a chance in the House.

Or maybe not. Democrats are fighting against a lot of midterm election history
where the president’s party typically does poorly. They’ve also benefited from a
turnout advantage in recent special elections that may not be replicated in
November. The FiveThirtyEight forecast does not consider the special election
results and hedges based on these historical trends; it’s why it still has
Republicans as 75 percent favorites to keep the House, although Democrats’
chances of retaining the Senate continue to improve and are now 68 percent.1

As of 5 p.m. Eastern on Thursday.

Still, whenever a Democrat gets elected in Alaska — even given the quirks of the
instant-runoff process in the state — it’s probably worth asking again if things
could go really badly for the GOP.

Last month, I examined a series of what I called asterisk midterm elections.
These were the midterms that were the exceptions to the rule: When the
president’s party actually gained seats in the House, or at least fought things
to a near-draw while gaining in the Senate. The elections were 1934, 1962, 1998
and 2002, and three of the four involved some type of national emergency (the
Great Depression, the Cuban missile crisis and the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks).
The 1998 midterm was the exception to this, but it did have a national
controversy of its own — a backlash to Republican overreach on the Monica
Lewinsky scandal and subsequent impeachment trial. I argued that 2022 has some
features in common with these elections, but it had the most in common with 1998
given the partisan overreach that is happening now.

Recent Stories from FiveThirtyEight
PLAY Top Articles by FiveThirtyEight Video Settings Full Screen About Connatix
V181155 Read More Read More Read More Read More Read More Read More The Datasets
We’re Looking AtThis Week 1/1 Skip Ad Continue watching after the ad Visit
Advertiser websiteGO TO PAGE



In particular, the involvement of former President Donald Trump makes 2022
different than almost any other midterm.

At this point, we’re used to Trump’s ubiquity in American political life. But
this degree of involvement from a former president — or, for that matter, even
an ex-presidential candidate — is highly unusual. Take a look, for example, at
the amount of Google search traffic for Trump as compared with other former
presidents.



Former Presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush kept a very low profile after
completing their second terms. And the previous losing candidate before Trump,
Hillary Clinton, famously retreated to the woods in Chappaqua, New York, after
2016. Their search traffic quickly dropped to near-zero once their campaigns or
presidencies were over, and then stayed there.

Trump’s search traffic, meanwhile, is much less than during his presidency, but
it’s still fairly high. Over the past year, in fact, there’s been about as much
search traffic for Trump as for the current president, Joe Biden!

And the amount of news interest in Trump has been increasing recently. Part of
that is the string of endorsements he’s made in Republican primaries, but the
bigger factor is the FBI’s seizure of classified documents he had in his
possession at his Florida estate, Mar-a-Lago.



When that seizure occurred, a certain strain of conventional wisdom suggested
that this could help Republicans in the midterms, such as by increasing the
enthusiasm of GOP voters.2

There’s also a strain of conventional wisdom that suggests the Mar-a-Lago
seizure could help Trump’s nomination chances in 2024. I think that case is
overstated, but that’s beyond the scope of our article today.

If that’s true, it’s not showing up in the data. The past four special elections
— two in New York, one in Alaska and one in Minnesota — all occurred after the
seizure on Aug. 8, and they all showed excellent results for Democrats. And
Democrats have actually gained about a point on the generic ballot since then,
although it’s a small enough difference that it could be statistical noise.

It’s not exactly some genius insight to suggest that Trump could cause problems
for Republicans in the midterms. At the very least, he’s directly put their
prospects at risk by endorsing inexperienced candidates like Mehmet Oz in
Pennsylvania and Blake Masters in Arizona, who are badly underperforming
partisan benchmarks in their states.

But it’s also the case that Trump’s continued dominance over the GOP violates a
potentially key assumption behind the “midterm curse,” which is that a party
usually tries to pivot away from its losing candidates.

Sometimes that pivot involves providing voters a menu of new policy options,
such as the GOP’s “Contract with America” in 1994. Many times it’s a pivot to
the center, though it doesn’t need to be; the tea party movement in 2010 was
more conservative in some ways than Bush, but it still offered voters something
a little different.

Recent Stories from FiveThirtyEight
PLAY Top Articles by FiveThirtyEight Video Settings Full Screen About Connatix
V181155 Read More Read More Read More Read More Read More Read More The Datasets
We’re Looking AtThis Week 1/1 Skip Ad Continue watching after the ad Visit
Advertiser websiteGO TO PAGE



The pivot doesn’t necessarily need to involve a new figurehead for the party,
either. It probably helps if you don’t have one, in fact, since then you can
frame the election as a referendum on the incumbent party’s performance and take
advantage of thermostatic changes in public opinion rather than as a choice
between imperfect alternatives, as presidential elections turn into.

In 2018, for instance, Trump gave Democrats a lot of ammunition to run on, and
they nominated different kinds of candidates in different kinds of districts
while preparing for a very large presidential primary field. What you didn’t
see, though, was a lot of Clinton, who didn’t make her first campaign appearance
until October.

Let’s play out that counterfactual, though. Imagine that, in 2018, Clinton had
been very active on the campaign trail, endorsing candidates that often went
against the wishes of the party establishment, repeatedly claiming that the 2016
election had been stolen — and then there had been a FBI seizure of classified
secretary of state records in Chappaqua.

Would that have helped Democrats in the midterms? Probably not.

But if anything, Republicans are doubling down on Trump and Trumpism. This week,
he demanded a redo of the 2020 election. The leading candidate for the 2024
nomination apart from Trump, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, defended Trump after the
Mar-a-Lago search and has even come to mimic some of his mannerisms and manners
of speech. Republicans have had problems with candidate quality in Senate and
gubernatorial races before, but this year, inexperienced and/or very right-wing
candidates — often ones endorsed by Trump — are the rule and not the exception.

Recent Stories from FiveThirtyEight
PLAY Top Articles by FiveThirtyEight Video Settings Full Screen About Connatix
V181155 Read More Read More Read More Read More Read More Read More The Datasets
We’re Looking AtThis Week 1/1 Skip Ad Continue watching after the ad Visit
Advertiser websiteGO TO PAGE







All that said, I still think the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe — and
maybe declining inflation — are the more important factors in Democrats’ recent
surge. But Republicans are behaving in atypical ways for an opposition party in
the midterms, and they may get an atypically poor outcome as a result.


FOOTNOTES

 1. As of 5 p.m. Eastern on Thursday.

 2. There’s also a strain of conventional wisdom that suggests the Mar-a-Lago
    seizure could help Trump’s nomination chances in 2024. I think that case is
    overstated, but that’s beyond the scope of our article today.

Nate Silver is the founder and editor in chief of FiveThirtyEight.
@natesilver538

Filed under

Donald Trump (1593 posts) Election Update (242) 2022 Election (175) 2022
Midterms (95) Election Updates (14)


COMMENTS


Sponsored Links by TaboolaSponsored Links by Taboola
Promoted LinksPromoted Links
You May Like

Explore The Ways Republicans Or Democrats Could Win The Midterms


Undo

Georgia’s Senate Race Is Much Closer Than The Governor Election. Will That Hold
Until November?


Undo

What Is Republicans’ Path To Winning The Senate?


Undo

What’s Driving Biden’s Approval Rating Up?


Undo

Why Massachusetts’s Governorship Is The Likeliest To Flip In 2022


Undo

What Biden’s Rising Approval Could Mean For The Midterms


Undo

What Democrats’ Win In Alaska Tells Us About November


Undo

Does Herschel Walker Have Enough Goodwill In Georgia To Win A Senate Seat?


Undo

More Democrats Are Leaving The House — And That Could Help Republicans Win


Undo



LATEST INTERACTIVES




MORE IN 2022 ELECTION

 * 2022 Election
   
   What Is Republicans' Path To Winning The Senate? Sep 8, 2022

 * 2022 Election
   
   Georgia’s Senate Race Is Much Closer Than The Governor Election. Will That
   Hold Until November? Sep 7, 2022

 * 2022 Election
   
   Why Massachusetts’s Governorship Is The Likeliest To Flip In 2022 Sep 6, 2022

 * Presidential Approval
   
   What's Driving Biden's Approval Rating Up? Sep 2, 2022


LATEST

 * NFL
   
   Our NFC Projections Foresee a Battle of the Bays Sep 8, 2022

 * Data Is Plural
   
   The Datasets We're Looking At This Week Sep 7, 2022

WANT THE LATEST POLITICS NEWS? GET IT IN YOUR INBOX.

You are now subscribed!
Email Address Sign me up

See all newsletters




Get more FiveThirtyEight
 * Store
 * Newsletter
 * Twitter
 * Facebook
 * Data
 * RSS

 * 
 * 

 * About Us
 * Jobs
 * Masthead
 * Pitch FiveThirtyEight
 * Advertise With Us
 * About Nielsen Measurement

Powered by WordPress VIP
 * Terms of Use
 * Privacy Policy
 * Do Not Sell My Personal Information
 * Your California Privacy Rights
 * Children's Online Privacy Policy
 * Interest-Based Ads

© 2022 ABC News Internet Ventures. All rights reserved.

Close Additional Information Terms of Use and Privacy Policy and Safety
Information/Your California Privacy Rights/Children's Online Privacy Policy are
applicable to you. © 2022 ABC News Internet Ventures. All rights reserved.
Interest-Based Ads. Cookie Policy.





DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION

The California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”) permits California residents, or
their authorized agents, to opt out of the “sale” of their personal information
to third parties. The CCPA defines the term “sale” broadly, and it may include
sharing certain information for particular advertising purposes. We never sell
personal information to third parties for money. Please visit Your California
Privacy Rights for more information about California residents’ rights and our
privacy practices.

ESSENTIAL COOKIES



These cookies are necessary for our services to function and cannot be switched
off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you
which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy
preferences, logging in, accessing, searching, or discovering content, or
filling in forms. You can set your browser to block, or alert you about, these
cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.

PERFORMANCE COOKIES

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and
improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the
most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. Please note
that even if this category is set as inactive, we may continue to collect and
use data through these cookies solely to assist us in performing the service.

SALE OF PERSONAL DATA

Sale of Personal Data

When you visit this website, we and our partners may collect certain information
about you, your devices, and your behaviour, and “sell” this information to
third parties to provide you with certain advertising on this site and across
the web tailored to you and your interests. You can use the opt out toggle above
to opt out of the “sale” of your personal information, as defined by the CCPA,
of certain advertising on this site. If you opt out on this website, your choice
will not apply to any other property. Your CCPA opt out right must be exercised
on each website of the Walt Disney Family of Companies you access. You or your
authorized agent can change your opt out selection anytime by clicking the “Do
Not Sell My Personal Information” link on this site. Note, third parties may
engage in their own sales as defined by the CCPA and you must exercise your CCPA
opt out right with each such company separately using this link.

If you choose to opt out of “sale” of your personal information, you may
continue to see advertising, such as ads by us or our partners that are tailored
to you and your interests, including, for example, ads that do not involve the
“sale” of personal information or ads based on personal information that was
“sold” before you opted out. You or your authorized agent may also have other
choices and tools that allow you to control certain data collection activities.
To learn more, visit Do Not Sell My Personal Information Rights.


BACK BUTTON PERFORMANCE COOKIES



Vendor Search Search Icon
Filter Icon

Clear
checkbox label label
Apply Cancel
Consent Leg.Interest
checkbox label label
checkbox label label
checkbox label label

Confirm My Choices