www.washingtonpost.com
Open in
urlscan Pro
23.204.2.78
Public Scan
URL:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2024/11/19/trump-mortgages-housing-fannie-freddie/?utm_campaign=wp_post_most&
Submission: On November 21 via api from CA — Scanned from CA
Submission: On November 21 via api from CA — Scanned from CA
Form analysis 1 forms found in the DOM
<form class="wpds-c-gRPFSl wpds-c-gRPFSl-jGNYrR-isSlim-false">
<div class="transition-all duration-200 ease-in-out"><button type="submit" data-qa="sc-newsletter-signup-button" class="wpds-c-kSOqLF wpds-c-kSOqLF-uTUwn-variant-primary wpds-c-kSOqLF-eHdizY-density-default wpds-c-kSOqLF-ejCoEP-icon-left">Sign
up</button></div>
</form>Text Content
Accessibility statementSkip to main content Democracy Dies in Darkness SubscribeSign in Democracy Dies in Darkness BusinessEconomyEconomic PolicyPersonal FinanceWorkTechnologyBusiness of Climate BusinessEconomyEconomic PolicyPersonal FinanceWorkTechnologyBusiness of Climate THE UPCOMING HOUSING BATTLE THAT COULD ROIL MORTGAGE COSTS EVEN MORE The first Trump administration tried to remove two mortgage giants, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, from government control. The second one might finish the job. 5 min 1209 A housing development in Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania, in March. (Gene J. Puskar/AP) By Rachel Siegel Updated November 19, 2024 at 2:17 p.m. EST|Published November 19, 2024 at 6:00 a.m. EST A big change to housing policy that many experts anticipate from the new Trump administration could roil the mortgage market and throw an already unsettled real estate industry into more turmoil. The new administration is widely expected to resume a push to remove Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two national mortgage behemoths that buy up huge quantities of loans, from government control. That initiative was a priority during President-elect Donald Trump’s first term, but the pandemic thwarted those plans. Now, though, economists and housing experts say the government has to be especially careful not to reshuffle the companies in a way that raises uncertainty or spooks investors, with mortgage rates already high and affordability at a crisis point. Get a curated selection of 10 of our best stories in your inbox every weekend. “It’s really a question, not so much of ‘whether,’ but ‘how’” the change gets made, said Michael Fratantoni, chief economist at the Mortgage Bankers Association. Advertisement Story continues below advertisement The mortgage market is already behaving in unexpected ways. After the 30-year fixed rate peaked around 8 percent last fall, it eased as the Federal Reserve began lowering interest rates. But now mortgage costs are again ticking up despite more Fed cuts, driven by a strong economy and the ongoing reality that there aren’t enough homes to go around. The firms are deeply embedded in the workings of housing finance in America, and the popular 30-year fixed rate mortgage simply wouldn’t exist without them. Fannie and Freddie don’t make mortgage loans directly, but rather buy and package them into securities. Together, the companies guarantee about half of existing home loans. During the mortgage-market meltdown of 2008, the George W. Bush administration effectively nationalized the companies in an effort to stabilize financial markets and keep mortgage credit flowing. Ever since, Fannie and Freddie have existed in a kind of legal and financial purgatory known as “conservatorship” overseen by the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA). The securities they sell to investors are considered safe on Wall Street, since the companies are entitled to massive government support if needed under the terms of their federal bailout agreements. Advertisement Story continues below advertisement The arrangement brokered more than 15 years ago was never meant to be permanent. But while some economists and policymakers have since taken a “don’t fix what’s not broken” approach, Trump’s advisers are widely expected to try to finish what they started before the pandemic hit. Many conservatives believe the government shouldn’t directly control such large businesses and that companies like Fannie and Freddie need buffers against the political agendas of a sitting White House. Share this articleShare During Trump’s first term, a driving force to overhaul Fannie and Freddie was Mark Calabria, then the head of the FHFA and now believed to be a potential member in the new administration. In an interview with The Washington Post, Calabria said he still believes in privatizing the companies — and that mortgage rates would not rise if the process is done in a way that leaves investors assured that mortgage-backed securities are still risk-free. (Calabria said any personnel decisions were up to the president-elect.) “Fannie and Freddie are, under law, expected to be fixed,” Calabria said. “It’s better to do this in a calm environment than to try to fix something in the middle of a crisis.” Advertisement Story continues below advertisement Ending Fannie and Freddie’s conservatorship could work in a few ways. Congress could pass a law overhauling the entire mortgage-finance system and grant an explicit guarantee on securities issued by Fannie, Freddie or future competitors. But that kind of involvement from Capitol Hill is highly unlikely after repeated efforts failed to gain much traction. Another, more likely option: The Trump administration sidesteps Congress. Under one scenario, the Treasury Department and the FHFA agree to release the companies after they continue to retain their earnings for another year or two. In exchange, they would have to agree to pay taxpayers an ongoing fee for the government’s backstop, which is necessary for their business model. Any option that includes no such backstop would cause markets to go haywire. Trump has many financial priorities, and revamping Fannie and Freddie wasn’t a stated goal of his campaign. But shares of the companies have been on an upward tear since Election Day — with Fannie Mae’s stock more than doubling, and climbing further on Tuesday morning — a telling barometer of how much the markets expect the companies will be released. Advertisement Story continues below advertisement Still, others within the mortgage industry fear an abrupt change to the market — including an elimination or paring back of the government backstop — would push mortgages up. That’s because investors who buy Fannie and Freddie’s mortgage-backed securities could demand higher interest rates, especially if there is no explicit government backstop for the mortgage bonds. Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody’s Analytics who also advised the Kamala Harris campaign, said such a move would leave the 30-year fixed rate mortgage “diminished.” “Whatever scenario you pick — it’s just worse than the status quo,” Zandi said. Andrew Ackerman contributed to this report. Share 1209 Comments NewsletterWednesdays The Color of Money Advice on how to save, spend and talk about your money for the short and long term from Michelle Singletary. Sign up Recommended for you Recommended by Subscribe to comment and get the full experience. Choose your plan → Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement Company About The Post Newsroom Policies & Standards Diversity & Inclusion Careers Media & Community Relations WP Creative Group Accessibility Statement Sections Trending Politics Elections Opinions National World Style Sports Business Climate Well+Being D.C., Md., & Va. Obituaries Weather Arts & Entertainments Recipes Get The Post Manage Your Subscription Become a Subscriber Gift Subscriptions Mobile & Apps Newsletters & Alerts Washington Post Live Reprints & Permissions Post Store Books & E-Books Print Special Editions Store Print Archives (Subscribers Only) Today’s Paper Public Notices Contact Us Contact the Newsroom Contact Customer Care Contact the Opinions Team Advertise Licensing & Syndication Request a Correction Send a News Tip Report a Vulnerability Terms of Use Digital Products Terms of Sale Print Products Terms of Sale Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Settings Submissions & Discussion Policy RSS Terms of Service Sitemap Ad Choices washingtonpost.com © 1996-2024 The Washington Post COMPANY CHEVRON ICON Diversity & Inclusion Careers Media & Community Relations WP Creative Group Accessibility Statement SECTIONS CHEVRON ICON Trending Politics Elections Opinions National World Style Sports Business Climate Well+Being D.C., Md., & Va. Obituaries Weather Arts & Entertainments Recipes GET THE POST CHEVRON ICON Manage Your Subscription Become a Subscriber Gift Subscriptions Mobile & Apps Newsletters & Alerts Washington Post Live Reprints & Permissions Post Store Books & E-Books Print Special Editions Store Print Archives (Subscribers Only) Today’s Paper Public Notices CONTACT US CHEVRON ICON Contact the Newsroom Contact Customer Care Contact the Opinions Team Advertise Licensing & Syndication Request a Correction Send a News Tip Report a Vulnerability Download the Washington Post App * About The Post * Policies & Standards * Digital Products Terms of Sale * Print Products Terms of Sale * Terms of Service * Privacy Policy * Cookie Settings * Submissions & Discussion Policy * RSS Terms of Service * Sitemap * Ad Choices * washingtonpost.com * © 1996-2024 The Washington Post