www.bls.gov
Open in
urlscan Pro
2a02:26f0:480:5aa::18b9
Public Scan
URL:
https://www.bls.gov/opub/btn/volume-9/how-do-jobseekers-search-for-jobs.htm
Submission: On May 17 via manual from US — Scanned from DE
Submission: On May 17 via manual from US — Scanned from DE
Form analysis
3 forms found in the DOMGET /search/query
<form method="get" action="/search/query">
<label for="bls-banner-search-submit1" class="invisible">Search button</label>
<input type="image" src="/images/buttons/search_button_blue_16.png" name="term" id="bls-banner-search-submit1" alt="BLS Search Submit" title="Submit">
<label for="bls-banner-search-input1" class="invisible">Search:</label>
<input name="query" type="text" id="bls-banner-search-input1" value="Search BLS.gov" title="Search Input" onclick="this.value=''; this.onclick = null;">
</form>
GET /search/query
<form method="get" action="/search/query">
<label for="bls-banner-search-submit" class="invisible">Search button</label>
<input type="image" src="/images/buttons/search_button_blue_20.png" name="term" id="bls-banner-search-submit" alt="BLS Search Submit" title="Submit">
<label for="bls-banner-search-input" class="invisible">Search:</label>
<input name="query" type="text" id="bls-banner-search-input" value="Search BLS.gov" title="Search Input" onclick="this.value=''; this.onclick = null;">
</form>
GET /search/query
<form method="get" id="search-secondary-nav-form" action="/search/query">
<label class="invisible" for="search-secondary-nav-query">Search BTN:</label>
<input type="hidden" value="https://www.bls.gov/opub/btn/" id="search-secondary-nav-category" name="prefix">
<input type="text" onclick="this.value=''; this.onclick = null;" value="SEARCH" id="search-secondary-nav-query" name="query">
<input type="submit" value="GO" id="search-secondary-nav-submit" name="submit">
</form>
Text Content
Skip to Content An official website of the United States government Here is how you know United States Department of Labor The .gov means it's official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site. The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Follow Us | Release Calendar | Blog Search button Search: Menu * Search button Search: Follow Us | Release Calendar | Blog * Home * About BLS * History * Our Leadership * Budget and Performance * Questions and Answers * A-Z Index * Glossary * Careers at BLS * BLS Speakers Available * Errata * Contact BLS * Overview of BLS Statistics * Demographics * Industries * Business Costs * Occupations * Geography * Resources For * Business Leaders * Consumers * Developers * Economists * Investors * Jobseekers * Media * Public Policymakers * Researcher * Students & Teachers * Survey Respondents * Subjects * Inflation & Prices * Consumer Price Index * Producer Price Indexes * Import/Export Price Indexes * Contract Escalation * Price Index Research * Pay & Benefits * Employment Costs * Wage Data by Occupation * Earnings by Demographics * Earnings by Industry * County Wages * Benefits * Modeled Wage Estimates * Compensation Research * Strikes & Lockouts * Occupational Requirements * Unemployment * National Unemployment Rate * State & Local Unemployment Rates * Unemployment Research * Employment * National Employment * State & Local Employment * County Employment * Worker Characteristics * American Indian Report * Employment Projections * Job Openings & Labor Turnover Survey * Business Response Survey * Employment by Occupation * Work Experience Over Time * Business Employment Dynamics * Foreign Direct Investment * Employment Research * Workplace Injuries * Productivity * Labor and Total Factor Productivity * Productivity Research * Spending & Time Use * Consumer Expenditures * How Americans Spend Time * International * International Technical Cooperation * Import/Export Price Indexes * Geographic Information * New England (Boston) * New York-New Jersey (NY City) * Mid-Atlantic (Philadelphia) * Southeast (Atlanta) * Midwest (Chicago) * Southwest (Dallas) * Mountain-Plains (Kansas City) * West (San Francisco) * Data Tools * Data Retrieval Tools * BLS Popular Series * Series Report * Top Picks, One Screen, Multi-Screen, and Maps * Data Finder * Public Data API * Charts and Applications * Charts for Economic News Releases * CPI Inflation Calculator * Injury and Illness Calculator * Pay Measure Comparison * Demographic Data Sources * COVID-19 Economic Trends * Industry Productivity Viewer * Employment and Wages Data Viewer * Industry Finder from the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages * Customized Tables * U.S. Economy at a Glance * Regions, States & Areas at a Glance * Industry at a Glance * Text Files * News Release Tables * More Sources of Data * Restricted Data Access * Discontinued Databases * Questions & Answers * Special Notices * Publications * Latest Publications * The Economics Daily * Monthly Labor Review * Beyond the Numbers * Spotlight on Statistics * Reports * Commissioner's Corner * Videos * Career Outlook * Occupational Outlook Handbook * Geographic Profile * Handbook of Methods * Research Papers * Copyright Information * Contact & Help * Weekly Update * Economic Releases * Latest Releases * Major Economic Indicators * Schedules for news Releases * By Month * By News Release * Current Year * Prior Years * Archived News Releases * Employment & Unemployment * Monthly * Quarterly, annual, and other * Inflation & Prices * Pay & Benefits & Workplace Injuries * Productivity & Technology * Employment Projections * Regional News Releases * Classroom * K-12 Student & Teacher Resources * Games & Quizzes * Student's Desk * Teacher's Desk * Questions & Answers * Beta * Redesigned News Releases * Bureau of Labor Statistics * Publications * Beyond the Numbers Search BTN: * HOME * ARCHIVE * Archive By Date * Archive By Program * Archive By Publication * Archive By Theme * ABOUT * SUBSCRIBE November 2020 | Vol. 9 / No. 14 EMPLOYMENT & UNEMPLOYMENT HOW DO JOBSEEKERS SEARCH FOR JOBS? NEW DATA ON APPLICATIONS, INTERVIEWS, AND JOB OFFERS By Michael R. Dalton and Jeffrey A. Groen RELATED ARTICLES Job search of the unemployed by duration of unemployment Length of job search for the unemployed How successful are jobseekers in finding jobs? How many applications does it take to get an interview? How likely is a job offer after an interview? Are job offers accepted or turned down? Data on job search are typically not available for large representative samples or do not address all of these questions. However, data have become available that quantify job-seeking activity at a specific time during a person’s unemployment spell. This Beyond the Numbers article explores aspects of job search using data from a supplement to the Current Population Survey (CPS) in May and September 2018 which obtained information about the job search of those who were not employed and asked whether people applied for and received unemployment insurance (UI) benefits. The CPS is a monthly survey of about 60,000 households that provides data on employment and unemployment in the United States, including the national unemployment rate. In the supplement, questions about job search were asked of those who were without a job and had looked for work recently. In this analysis, we restrict the sample to those who were unemployed at the time of the survey and had looked for work in the past 4 weeks. APPLICATIONS, INTERVIEWS, AND JOB OFFERS Data have rarely been available to explore, in depth, the mechanisms behind job searches. In particular, little is known about the number of applications sent, job interviews conducted, and job offers made over the job-search spell. Three studies analyze job search behavior using data from the American Time Use Survey and a survey of New Jersey UI recipients.1 The analysis in these studies relies on time spent on job search activities as the measure of job search intensity. The survey of New Jersey UI recipients also asks about job offers, allowing some analysis of the relationship between search efforts and job offers. Another study examines job search activity by using online job application data, although the data do not contain any information about interviews or job offers received as a result of the applications.2 The CPS supplement asks a series of questions to help analysts better understand relationships among applications, interviews, and job offers. The CPS supplement asks jobseekers how many jobs they applied for in the last 2 months and how many of those jobs applied for led to an interview. The supplement also asks jobseekers how many job offers they received since they last worked. Table 1 shows the relationship between the number of job applications sent and the number of interviews received as a result of these job applications. For the survey, the response options were banded together in groups. The table shows the percent distribution of the number of interviews for each application group. There is a clear pattern that more applications lead to more interviews.3 For example, those who applied for 1 to 10 jobs typically had 0, 1, or 2 interviews, whereas those who applied for 21 to 80 jobs typically had 1 to 7 interviews. The data in table 1 shows an approximate ratio of 1 interview per 6 applications submitted.4 Table 1. Applications sent and interviews received by jobseekers, 2018 Interviews Applications 0 1 or 2 3 to 7 8 or more Total 1 to 10 38.3 47.3 12.6 1.8 100.0 11 to 20 26.7 35.1 32.0 6.2 100.0 21 to 80 19.2 32.7 33.4 14.7 100.0 81 or more 14.8 19.9 35.4 29.9 100.0 Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, supplement to the Current Population Survey, 2018. Table 2 shows how the numbers of applications and interviews vary by duration of unemployment.5 The duration of unemployment categories are less than 5 weeks, 5 to 14 weeks, 15 to 26 weeks, and 27 weeks and over. We use 26 weeks as a break between the third and fourth categories because during 2018, the typical maximum duration of unemployment benefits was 26 weeks. The average number of applications were a bit less for those with unemployment durations of 14 weeks or fewer than for those with durations of 15 to 26 weeks. The average number of interviews follows a similar pattern. As a result, the average interview-to-application ratio stays fairly constant across unemployment duration categories. Table 2. Number of applications and interviews, by duration of unemployment, 2018 Duration of unemployment Average number of applications Average number of interviews Average interview-to-application ratio All jobseekers 13.67 1.93 0.168 Less than 5 weeks 10.32 1.63 0.168 5 to 14 weeks 15.40 2.09 0.174 15 to 26 weeks 17.22 2.38 0.180 27 weeks and over 13.92 1.81 0.153 Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, supplement to the Current Population Survey, 2018. Table 3 shows the likelihood of receiving a job offer and how it relates to the number of applications sent. Although there is not a monotonic relationship between applying for more jobs and being more likely to have received a job offer, there appears to be a positive association. Among jobseekers who sent up to 80 applications, those who applied to more jobs were more likely to have received a job offer; however, the group that applied for 81 or more jobs was less likely to have received a job offer than those who applied to 21 to 80 jobs.6 One possible explanation is that jobseekers who apply for many jobs believe their chances of getting a job offer are lower, so that applying for more jobs is meant to balance a difficult job search for themselves. Another possible explanation is that these jobseekers have more urgency in finding a job and are therefore less targeted in their application process. Table 3. Percentage of jobseekers receiving a job offer, by number of applications, 2018 Applications Probability of receiving job offer All jobseekers 26.24 0 13.21 1 to 10 27.20 11 to 20 29.48 21 to 80 30.89 81 or more 20.36 Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, supplement to the Current Population Survey, 2018. Table 4 shows the relationship between interviews and having received a job offer. Those having at least one interview from their applications sent in the last 2 months had about a 37-percent chance of having received a job offer, while those with no interviews had about a 10-percent chance of having received a job offer.7 Table 4. Percentage of jobseekers receiving a job offer, by number of interviews Had at least one interview? Probability of receiving job offer All jobseekers 27.74 No 9.94 Yes 36.89 Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, supplement to the Current Population Survey, 2018. Table 5 shows unemployment duration and its relation to job offers. Notably, the probability of receiving a job offer did not increase as someone had been unemployed longer. This is likely a result of a selected sample in unemployment duration: individuals who get a job offer early in their unemployment spell are unlikely to remain unemployed, and the individuals with long duration could be people who didn’t search intensely from the beginning of their spell. Table 5. Percentage of jobseekers receiving a job offer, by duration of unemployment, 2018 Duration of unemployment Probability of receiving job offer All jobseekers 26.21 Less than 5 weeks 30.94 5 to 14 weeks 26.52 15 to 26 weeks 27.32 27 weeks and over 18.44 Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, supplement to the Current Population Survey, 2018. REASON FOR TURNING DOWN A JOB OFFER In addition to choosing the applications they send out, jobseekers have a choice of what job offers they accept. In terms of what offers they accept, most theoretical models of job search focus only on the jobseekers’ reservation wage—the lowest wage they are willing to accept in a job offer. However, jobs—and how good of a fit the job is to a jobseeker—are more complex than just the wage. One study analyzed European data from 1994 to 2001 on unemployed respondents who had turned down a job offer in the last 4 weeks. It found that only about 15 percent cited a wage that was too low as the primary reason.8 The CPS supplement asked a similar question about the reason for turning down a job offer (respondents were asked to give only one reason).9 The tabulations are reported in table 6. Overall, 23 percent said that they turned down the job offer because of the wage.10 Inconvenient hours (12 percent), personal reasons (13 percent), commuting time (11 percent), and other reasons (16 percent) made up significant portions of the reasons.11 Table 6. Reasons for declining a job offer, 2018 Reason Percent The wage was too low 23.24 Personal reasons for turning down the job (e.g., ill health, could not arrange child care, not physically able to do the job) 13.25 The hours of work were not convenient 12.13 The commute to the job would have been too long 10.97 It did not offer a flexible enough schedule 6.96 The hours of work were too few 6.51 The job was not in my usual occupation/would not use my skills well 6.04 The job would have required me to move, relocate to another part of the country 3.84 The benefits associated with the job (pension, health insurance) were not good 1.48 The job did not have good promotion potential 0 Other reason 15.58 Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, supplement to the Current Population Survey, 2018. CONCLUSION Our analysis of job search behavior using data from the CPS indicates that it took jobseekers on average six applications to obtain one interview. Jobseekers having at least 1 interview had about a 37-percent chance of having received a job offer, while those with no interviews had about a 10-percent chance of having received a job offer. When jobseekers turned down a job offer, only about one-quarter said it was because the wage was too low; other important factors were inconvenient hours, personal reasons (such as childcare), and commuting time. This Beyond the Numbers summary was prepared by Michael R. Dalton and Jeffrey A. Groen, research economists in the Office of Employment and Unemployment Statistics, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Email: Dalton.Michael@bls.gov and Groen.Jeffrey@bls.gov; telephone: (202) 691-7391. Information in this article will be made available upon request to individuals with sensory impairments. Voice phone: (202) 691-5200. Federal Relay Service: 1-800-877-8339. This article is in the public domain and may be reproduced without permission. SUGGESTED CITATION: Michael R. Dalton and Jeffrey A. Groen, “How do jobseekers search for jobs? New data on applications, interviews, and job offers,” Beyond the Numbers: Employment & Unemployment, vol. 9, no. 14 (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, November 2020), https://www.bls.gov/opub/btn/volume-9/how-do-jobseekers-search-for-jobs.htm * Notes 1 Alan B. Krueger and Andreas Mueller, “Job search and unemployment insurance: New evidence from time use data,” Journal of Public Economics, 2010, 94(3–4): 298–307; Alan B. Krueger and Andreas Mueller, “Job search, emotional well-being, and job finding in a period of mass unemployment: Evidence from high-frequency longitudinal data,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2011, 1: 1–58; and Alan B. Krueger and Andreas I. Mueller, “A contribution to the empirics of reservation wages,” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2016, 8(1): 142–179. 2 R. Jason Faberman and Marianna Kudlyak, “The intensity of job search and search duration,” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2019, 11(3): 327–357. 3 We reject at the 1 percent level a chi-square test that the four application groups have the same distribution of interview responses. 4 To get a ratio, we assume the median of each numeric grouping in applications and interviews and the lower bound for the upper categories. 5 To get specific numbers, we assume the median of each numeric grouping in applications and interviews and the lower bound for the upper categories. 6 In the supplement, the reference period for questions about applications and interviews is the prior 2 months. The question about job offers refers to any offers since the respondent last worked. This means it is possible for a respondent to report having had a job offer but no applications or interviews if the job offer came more than 2 months ago. 7 The qualitative patterns in job offers across application groups in table 3 and across interview groups in table 4 are similar when we analyze the data separately by unemployment-duration group. 8 Peter Rupert, Elena Stancanelli, and Etienne Wasmer, “Commuting, wages and bargaining power,” Annals of Economics and Statistics, 2009, 95/96: 201–220. 9 The sample for this question is based partially on what rotation the respondent is in. All those in outgoing rotations (4th and 8th months in sample) who had received a job offer were asked the question about reason for turning down a job offer. For continuing rotations (1st, 2nd, 3rd, 5th, 6th, and 7th months in sample), individuals must not have applied for UI benefits (or if they applied, their application must have been declined) to be included in the sample for this question. 10 One of the response categories in the data was, “I have not turned down a job offer.” We exclude these cases from this tabulation. 11 Those who provided an “other” reason were asked the specific reason. We analyzed the specific reason given by these respondents, and if the reason fit into one of the other categories we recoded it into the appropriate category. Publish Date: Friday, November 13, 2020 Recommend this page using: Facebook Twitter LinkedIn * Home * Subjects * Data Tools * Publications * Economic Releases * Classroom * Beta U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Division of Information and Marketing Services PSB Suite 2850 2 Massachusetts Avenue NE Washington, DC 20212-0001 Telephone: 1-202-691-5200 Telecommunications Relay Service: 7-1-1 www.bls.gov/OPUB Contact Us resources * Inspector General (OIG) * Budget and Performance * Department of Labor Grants * No Fear Act * USA.gov * Vote.gov about the site * Sitemap * Freedom of Information Act * Privacy and Security Statement * Disclaimers * Linking and Copyright Info * Important Website Notices * Help and Tutorials Connect With BLS Twitter Youtube Email * Publications * Beyond the Numbers