www.freespeechdebate.com
Open in
urlscan Pro
139.162.229.10
Public Scan
URL:
https://www.freespeechdebate.com/
Submission: On November 25 via api from CA — Scanned from GB
Submission: On November 25 via api from CA — Scanned from GB
Form analysis 2 forms found in the DOM
GET //cse.google.co.uk/cse
<form role="form" method="get" id="searchform" action="//cse.google.co.uk/cse">
<label class="visuallyhidden" for="q">Search</label>
<div class="inputs">
<input id="cx" value="011222960384016654111:ogvmg_k80my" name="cx" type="hidden">
<input id="q" value="" name="q" placeholder="Search" type="text">
<button id="searchsubmit" type="submit"><i class="material-icons">search</i><span>Search</span></button>
</div>
</form>Name: loginform — POST https://freespeechdebate.com/wp-login.php
<form name="loginform" id="loginform" action="https://freespeechdebate.com/wp-login.php" method="post">
<p class="login-username">
<label for="user_login">Username or Email Address</label>
<input type="text" name="log" id="user_login" autocomplete="username" class="input" value="" size="20">
</p>
<p class="login-password">
<label for="user_pass">Password</label>
<input type="password" name="pwd" id="user_pass" autocomplete="current-password" spellcheck="false" class="input" value="" size="20">
</p>
<p class="login-remember"><label><input name="rememberme" type="checkbox" id="rememberme" value="forever"> Remember Me</label></p>
<p class="login-submit">
<input type="submit" name="wp-submit" id="wp-submit" class="button button-primary" value="Log In">
<input type="hidden" name="redirect_to" value="https://www.freespeechdebate.com/">
</p>
</form>Text Content
menuMain Menu Free Speech Debate searchSearch the site * Countries * Topics * Contributors * Read & Discuss * Watch & Listen * Aboutarrow_drop_down * The project * Our team * Our advisers * Funders and partners * Community standards * Contact us * In the media * arrow_backGo Back * micPodcast * searchSearch the site * account_circleYour account Skip to main content languageLanguages * العربية * Deutsch * English * Español * فارسی * Français * हिन्दी * 日本語 * Português * Русский * Türkçe * اردو * 简体中文 menuMain Menu Free Speech Debate searchSearch the site * Countries * Topics * Contributors * Read & Discuss * Watch & Listen * Aboutarrow_drop_down * The project * Our team * Our advisers * Funders and partners * Community standards * Contact us * In the media * arrow_backGo Back * micPodcast * searchSearch the site * account_circleYour account FEATURED CONTENT keyboard_arrow_left WOJCIECH SADURSKI: DEFAMATION AND THE DANGERS TO DEMOCRACY IN POLAND A DAY IN THE LIFE OF A CLIMATE SCIENTIST KISHA CLUBS IN JAPAN: AN IMPREGNABLE FORTRESS OF INFORMATION LICENSED LEAFLETING MEANS LOST LIBERTIES IN BRITAIN BIOTERRORISM AND BIRD FLU IS THE ‘HANDS-OFF’ INTERNET DIFFERENT TO INTERNET FREEDOM? AN INTRODUCTORY GUIDE TO THE TEN PRINCIPLES READ THE BOOK WENDY BARCLAY: SHOULD SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE WHICH COULD BE USED AS A BIOWEAPON BE WITHHELD FROM PUBLICATION? A RIGHT TO LIE ABOUT GOVERNMENT? WHY SHOULD AMAZON BE OUR TASTE AND DECENCY POLICE? DID TAMIFLU WORK? HOW CAN WE KNOW IF WE CAN’T FIND OUT? keyboard_arrow_right * 1 * 2 10 PRINCIPLES Explore each area. Agree or disagree with the principle. And vote! Swipe left to browse all ten principles. 01 LIFEBLOOD We – all human beings – must be free and able to express ourselves, and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas, regardless of frontiers. 02 VIOLENCE We neither make threats of violence nor accept violent intimidation. 03 KNOWLEDGE We allow no taboos against and seize every chance for the spread of knowledge. 04 JOURNALISM We require uncensored, diverse, trustworthy media so we can make well-informed decisions and participate fully in political life. 05 DIVERSITY We express ourselves openly and with robust civility about all kinds of human difference. 06 RELIGION We respect the believer but not necessarily the content of the belief. 07 PRIVACY We must be able to protect our privacy and to counter slurs on our reputations, but not prevent scrutiny that is in the public interest. 08 SECRECY We must be empowered to challenge all limits to freedom of information justified on such grounds as national security. 09 ICEBERGS We defend the internet and other systems of communication against illegitimate encroachments by both public and private powers. 10 COURAGE We decide for ourselves and face the consequences. Previous card Next card HIGHLIGHTS Swipe left to browse all of the highlights. PEEING ON PÉTAIN Eric Heinze examines the boundary between civil disobedience and desecration. WHAT IS ‘DEHUMANISING’ SPEECH? Eric Heinze provocatively argues that no-platformers need to look into the mirror and examine their own blind spots. GLASNOST! NINE WAYS FACEBOOK CAN MAKE ITSELF A BETTER FORUM FOR FREE SPEECH AND DEMOCRACY Free Speech Debate co-authors an Oxford-Stanford report on Facebook. ‘LENIN-FALL’: FREE SPEECH AND THE POLITICS OF MEMORY IN UKRAINE O.T. Jones argues that the Ukrainian state should not restrict open historical debate but use its 'expressive' powers to foster a nuanced understanding of the past. ARE YOU SITTING COMFORTABLY? HOW SAFE SPACES BECAME DANGEROUS We must distinguish between legitimate and illegitimate safe spaces, argues Eric Heinze. DON’T BLAME NEWS POLARISATION ON THE INTERNET…IT’S NOT THE TECHNOLOGY, STUPID! The internet does not guarantee polarised news, argues Richard Fletcher. BRIDGING THE DEEP DIGITAL DIVIDE IN INDIA Only 17% of rural India has internet access. But citizen journalism is giving voice to minorities says Arpita Biswas. RUSSIA: ‘THE CHURCH HAS AN ENEMY IN EVERY HOME.’ IT’S TELEVISION. Helen Haft explains how the Orthodox Church has eroded freedom of the media and lobbied for the 2013 law against offending religious feelings. ARE WE LOSING THE MEDIA WE NEED FOR DEMOCRACY? Timothy Garton Ash discusses the importance of and whether we are losing the media for democracy at the General Editors Network Summit 2017 in Vienna. THE INTERNET ALONE WILL NOT SET AFRICA FREE Iginio Gagliardone explores the surprising technopolitics of two competing visions of the internet, US and Chinese, in Ethiopia. FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN JAPAN AND THE DESIGNATED SECRETS LAW Arthur Stockwin explains the four main areas where free speech is under threat in Japan. ISRAEL, NO-PLATFORMING – AND WHY THERE’S NO SUCH THING AS ‘NARROW EXCEPTIONS’ TO CAMPUS FREE SPEECH Eric Heinze argues that it is contradictory to the principles of free speech to criticise the Israeli ambassador to Britain online and then no-platform him at a university talk. Previous card Next card -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Free Speech Debate is a research project of the Dahrendorf Programme for the Study of Freedom at St Antony's College in the University of Oxford. www.freespeechdebate.ox.ac.uk ABOUT FREE SPEECH DEBATE Free Speech Debate is a research project of the Dahrendorf Programme for the Study of Freedom at St Antony's College in the University of Oxford. READ MORE * Terms of use * Copyright & attribution * Accessibility * Privacy * Cookies * Follow on Twitter * micPodcast * searchSearch the site * account_circleYour account close SEARCH Search searchSearch close YOUR ACCOUNT Username or Email Address Password Remember Me Register close LANGUAGE * العربية * Deutsch * English * Español * فارسی * Français * हिन्दी * 日本語 * Português * Русский * Türkçe * اردو * 简体中文 Testing things.