www.nytimes.com Open in urlscan Pro
151.101.193.164  Public Scan

URL: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/05/10/opinion/nyc-office-vacancy-playground-city.html
Submission: On February 08 via manual from US — Scanned from US

Form analysis 0 forms found in the DOM

Text Content

Skip to contentSkip to site index
Search & Section Navigation
Section Navigation
SEARCH

SUBSCRIBE FOR $1/WEEKLog in


COMMENTS 727

26 Empire State Buildings Could Fit Into New York’s Empty Office Space. That’s a
Sign.Skip to Comments
The comments section is closed. To submit a letter to the editor for
publication, write to letters@nytimes.com.


Gus Powell
Opinion


26 EMPIRE STATE BUILDINGS COULD FIT INTO NEW YORK’S EMPTY OFFICE SPACE. THAT’S A
SIGN.

By Edward L. Glaeser and Carlo RattiMay 10, 2023

 * Share full articleShare free access
 * 
 * 
 * 727

By Edward L. Glaeser and Carlo Ratti


Photographs by Gus Powell


Mr. Glaeser is the chair of the economics department at Harvard and an author of
“Survival of the City.” Mr. Ratti is the director of the Senseable City Lab at
M.I.T. and an author of “The City of Tomorrow.”

New York is undergoing a metamorphosis from a city dedicated to productivity to
one built around pleasure. Many office buildings still feel eerily empty, with
occupancy around 50 percent of prepandemic levels, harming landlords and the
local economy. But 56 million people visited New York last year, making Fifth
Avenue in December feel as crowded as Ipanema Beach during Carnival.

The economic future of the city that never sleeps depends on embracing this
shift from vocation to recreation and ensuring that New Yorkers with a wide
range of talents want to spend their nights downtown, even if they are spending
their days on Zoom. We are witnessing the dawn of a new kind of urban area: the
Playground City.


NEW YORK CITY’S VACANT OFFICE SPACE COULD FILL 26.6 EMPIRE STATE BUILDINGS

Empire State Building 2,800,118 square feet
of office space
74,582,671 square feet of office space
Source: JLLReplay





























In downtowns from Chicago to Los Angeles, the physical layout of the
20th-century city is clashing with the new economy. Since the 1920s, single-use
zoning has divided our cities into separate neighborhoods for home, work and
play. Work-from-home and Netflix have made these distinctions irrelevant, but
our partitioned urban fabric has yet to catch up.

To create a city vibrant enough to compete with the convenience of the internet,
we need to end the era of single-use zoning and create mixed-use, mixed-income
neighborhoods that bring libraries, offices, movie theaters, grocery stores,
schools, parks, restaurants and bars closer together. We must reconfigure the
city into an experience worth leaving the house for. Streets once filled by
commuting crowds can be reinvigorated by those who really want to be there.

Office vacancies continue to climb

Q1 2023

Start of pandemic

Percentage of all office space that is vacant

20 percent

Chicago

15

Los Angeles

10

New York City

5

2000

2005

2010

2015

2020

2023

Office vacancies continue to climb

Percentage of all office space that is vacant

Start of pandemic

20 percent

Chicago

15

Los

Angeles

10

New York City

5

2000

2005

2010

2015

2020

2023

Source: JLL

This would not be New York’s first metamorphosis. Although the city seems set in
stone, its soul is essentially protean. In its 400-year history, Dutch fur
traders, Russian garment entrepreneurs, Mohawk ironworkers and African American
jazz musicians sought their fortunes in its busy streets — and each left a mark
on its character.

First, the city’s deep harbor and access to the Hudson made it America’s
dominant port. Industries like sugar refining and book publishing clustered
around the wharves because they depended on water-borne imports, such as the
pirated English novels that fueled New York’s early publishing industry.

Then came the railroads. The Rutgers economist Jason Barr has debunked the urban
myth that New York has two skyscraper-strewn business districts, Wall Street and
Midtown, because of the placement of bedrock. In fact, New York has these two
districts because development concentrates near trade.

The older district, Wall Street, was tethered to the ancient port. The newer
one, Midtown, grew up around the rail stations. The city’s manufacturing might
sprang from its location at the nexus of rail and sail. The age of the railway
was even more important to Chicago, with its gigantic Union Stock Yards, built
by a consortium of nine railroad companies to facilitate the flow of Western
beef into Eastern bellies.

But for over a century, the transportation-related advantages of older cities
like New York and Chicago have been waning. Container ships and the
proliferation of highways meant that by the 1960s, New York was no longer an
efficient place to mass-produce clothing — or almost anything else. The growth
of Los Angeles, in contrast, has been fueled by its Mediterranean climate and
California’s natural beauty.


LOS ANGELES’ VACANT OFFICE SPACE COULD FILL 30.7 U.S. BANK TOWERS

U.S. Bank Tower 1,432,539 square feet
of office space
44,046,970 square feet of office space
Source: JLLReplay

































The collapse of manufacturing sent New York into an existential crisis in the
1970s and intensified middle-class flight to the suburbs. (One bright spot, and
a lesson for the future: Abandoned industrial lofts provided inexpensive living
space for thousands, many of whom ignored the zoning codes that made their homes
illegal.) New York emerged from this slump by reinventing itself around
knowledge industries like financial services. Globalization delivers huge
returns to smart investors, and we get smart by being around other smart people.

The sheer size, density and connectivity that New York accrued in previous eras
became its saving grace. The 1987 movie “Wall Street” is a fable about how the
fictional Bud Fox learned unscrupulous shortcuts to wealth through face-to-face
contact with an older mentor. By 2008, 44 percent of Manhattan’s total payroll
went to people working in finance and insurance.

Manhattan’s economy depends on high-income workers in finance and technology

Payrolls by industry in Houston

Payrolls by industry in Manhattan

100%

100%

80

80

60

60

Professional and

technical services

40

40

20

Finance and insurance

20

Professional and technical services

Finance and insurance

2000

2004

2008

2012

2016

2020

2000

2004

2008

2012

2016

2020

Manhattan’s economy depends on high-income workers in

finance and technology

Payrolls by industry in Manhattan

Payrolls by industry in Houston

100%

100%

80

80

60

60

Professional and technical services

40

40

20

Finance and insurance

20

Professional and technical services

Finance and insurance

2000

2004

2008

2012

2016

2020

2000

2004

2008

2012

2016

2020

Manhattan’s economy depends on high-income workers in finance and technology

Payrolls by industry in

Houston

Manhattan

100%

80

60

Professional and

technical services

40

Finance and insurance

20

Professional and

technical services

Finance and insurance

’00

’10

’20

’00

’10

’20

Note: Houston payrolls also include all the suburbs in Harris County. Source:
U.S. Census Bureau

Finance differs from older industries because nothing intrinsic kept financial
firms in New York, meaning the city could retain its dominant industry only by
improving its quality of life. That helped lead voters to elect
management-oriented mayors, including Rudy Giuliani and Michael Bloomberg, who
focused on the city’s core services, especially policing. As crime levels fell,
the city’s intrinsic edge in providing fun re-emerged. In the 2000s, New York’s
image was captured more by the frivolity of “Sex and the City” than the
grittiness of “Taxi Driver.”

But unlike in earlier eras of urban success, this time New York did not produce
enough housing to keep up with demand. The cost of living skyrocketed. By 2008,
one of us was comparing New York wistfully with Houston, which remained
affordable for ordinary Americans because it built aggressively. Manhattan
became dependent on its elite earners — a large share of the tax base came from
a tiny proportion of the population — who were also the only group who could
afford to live in its increasingly expensive neighborhoods.



In 1980 the futurist Alvin Toffler argued that information technology would make
urban offices largely obsolete, with workers using residential “electronic
cottages” instead. For 40 years, he was wrong. Then, in an instant, it seemed
that he was right. The office tower, like the port and the train station before
it, had its relevance challenged by a competing technology: Zoom. In the early
days of the Covid pandemic, remote work was expected to last only for a few
weeks or months, but now it seems clear that some mix of in-person and fully
remote work is here to stay. The office has its advantages, but many people are
willing to give them up for the convenience and flexibility of working mostly
from home.

This sudden shift was a body blow to New York. Many offices remain empty, and
the city lost more than 300,000 inhabitants from 2020 to 2021. No other American
city experienced such a large numerical decline. Over the same period, Houston
lost only 12,000 people, although the global commercial real estate services
company JLL reports that Houston’s office vacancy rates are now even higher than
New York’s.


HOUSTON’S VACANT OFFICE SPACE COULD FILL 29.7 JPMORGAN CHASE TOWERS

JPMorgan Chase Tower 1,656,529 square feet
of office space
49,168,674 square feet of office space
Source: JLLReplay
































Yet even as we do not make a full return to the office, the social and economic
need for us to come together in cities has not gone away. Our research at M.I.T.
shows that when we replace in-person interactions with Zoom rooms, our social
lives become narrow and homogenous. Parallel research at Microsoft found that
“firmwide remote work caused the collaboration network of workers to become more
static and siloed, with fewer bridges between disparate parts.”

We may have a few close friends online, but we cannot sustain a network of weak
ties — the casual acquaintances we run into in the halls or on the bus. We are
exposed to less diversity of background and thought, and ideas flow less freely.
More permanent remote work could stunt innovation and economic growth as it
shrinks our social fabric. If the office is not returning to its central
position in our lives, then humanity, as a social species, must find new
opportunities for mixing in physical space.

Fortunately, the data shows that these alternatives are already emerging.
Although most measures and narratives describe a city struggling to recover its
prepandemic mojo, there is a visible bifurcation between office and city life.
Kastle Systems’ Back to Work Barometer shows that unique card swipes in some of
New York’s fanciest offices remain at less than 50 percent of prepandemic
levels. But track the same ZIP codes with mobile phone data from Safegraph,
which records individual visits to the area rather than office occupancy, and
the picture is more encouraging. There is still some decline, but it is not
nearly as steep. Repeat this analysis in cities across the nation, and you find
the same result. Offices may be empty, yet streets are astir.


CHICAGO’S VACANT OFFICE SPACE COULD FILL 15.8 WILLIS TOWERS

Willis Tower 3,781,045 square feet
of office space
59,863,725 square feet of office space
Source: JLLReplay


















Much of this revival comes from the release of pent-up demand for tourism:
Visits to New York rose 71 percent from 2021 to 2022. New York’s hotel occupancy
topped 90 percent in December — leading the nation. More can be done to persuade
city residents to leave their immediate neighborhoods. If people do not need to
go downtown for wages, they must instead desire to go there. A place to live and
play rather than work: This is the dream of the Playground City.

This idea is hardly new. Across the world, variables that indicate places of
pleasure have predicted urban success since the 1970s. Street-level
infrastructure — restaurants, parks, theaters and public squares — has long
served as a networked urban parlor. In 17th- and 18th-century London,
coffeehouses brought together artists, politicians and scholars such as Joshua
Reynolds, Edmund Burke and Samuel Johnson. Essentially, coffeehouses were shared
living rooms that enabled chance interaction. Johnson deserves credit for best
articulating the idea of the Playground City: “When a man is tired of London, he
is tired of life; for there is in London all that life can afford.”



The Playground City differs from the industrial or the office city because it is
focused on the jobs of everyday life. It differs from the Georgian London
enjoyed by Johnson and Beau Brummell because it offers joys to be relished by
the many, not just the elite few. In a Playground City, mixed-use neighborhoods
that tie life, labor and leisure together generate what the New York urbanist
Jane Jacobs calls the “sidewalk ballet,” a productive and playful dynamic in
which a diversity of different users come and go at all hours.

The transformation toward the Playground City will not happen on its own. New
York will need to recognize that the office market, especially its lower end, is
likely to face years of vacancies and that the city’s future depends on being
able to attract and empower new residents — the creative class and everyone else
— who might be tempted to settle down in other cities that are more affordable
and convenient. To address low commercial occupancy rates and struggling
businesses, Mayor Eric Adams and Gov. Kathy Hochul convened the “New” New York
Panel, which released its report in December. We contributed to the
conversations that culminated in the report and would like to elaborate on six
crucial lines of action.



1.Learn from big data, experimentation and randomized-control trials



There are many tools for potentially reviving urban centers — investing in
culture, reducing the regulation of recreation, spurring residential
development, improving public transit — but we don’t know what will work where.
These initiatives need to be refined through experimentation, data collection,
analysis and adjustment.



2.Jettison regulations that hinder urban innovation



The most obvious obstacle is single-use zoning, which has separated where people
live from where people work since the 1920s. Our research shows New York
neighborhoods without zoning monoculture are more walkable and that zoning
reforms must be carried out carefully to avoid increasing socioeconomic
segregation. We need flexible zoning to integrate the city, spread the power of
play across every neighborhood and allow offices to be converted into
residences.



3.Reinvent the building core



Even without red tape, remaking a city from the empty but brittle shells of
20th-century office towers will not be easy. Modern office towers have deep
floor plans meant to maximize square footage, but units in residential buildings
need windows and their natural ventilation and daylight. To achieve conversion
at scale, we must therefore look past the architecture of the traditional
apartment. Deep-core office buildings could be converted into new kinds of
spaces optimized for co-living and co-working. Bedrooms, with windows, could
line the perimeter while common areas for cooking, laundry, work, exercise and
socializing could fill the middle. Such arrangements could also help meet one of
the social challenges of our time: loneliness.



4.Animate the street



For the Playground City to draw people away from the instant gratification of
the Internet, governments must support a dynamic and scene-specific life at
ground level. During the pandemic, municipal governments armed with nothing but
yellow paint remade the streets and brought about a revolution in
pedestrianization and outdoor dining.

The urban playground should be constantly rearranged: Streets could be cleared
for weekends, annual festivals and temporary exhibitions; food bazaars and
pop-up shops could multiply. Movie theaters struggle to compete with boundless
streaming catalogs available on cheap 4K televisions. More outdoor screenings on
summer nights could tip the balance back toward collective experience. These
easy interventions are especially useful for garnering public support. To draw
people into the Playground City, we need to show, not tell.





5.Level the playing field between e-commerce and neighborhood businesses



E-commerce enables convenient shopping, but it also destroys brick-and-mortar
businesses, especially the small businesses that support local economies and
give streets their distinctiveness. The multiplication of small, rapid
deliveries causes congestion and increases emissions. E-commerce companies avoid
paying real estate taxes in the areas they serve and sometimes state and local
sales taxes as well, although there has been progress in recent years. To
sustain a vibrant street life, municipalities should fairly tax e-commerce for
the congestion it creates and lower their retail sales taxes, making local shops
more competitive.



6.Engage citizens



Governments should empower citizens to participate directly in making the
Playground City. The generation that grew up on social media has developed a
fierce, collective yearning to come together in the real world, shown
beautifully in the playful Facebook group New Urbanist Memes for
Transit-Oriented Teens. We should harness this energy. The office was a factory
where human beings were inputs, packed into cubicles to maximize their economic
output. The Playground City sees people as both a means and an end, and it
should involve them in the process of its creation.

Citizen engagement must include support for populations at risk of being
marginalized by the transition. A healthy city makes space for the rich and poor
alike. It generates positive interactions among people of all income levels by
providing accessible, beautiful and free or low-cost public and private spaces,
including plentiful and affordable housing.

New York needs to attract the rich and talented, but the poem beneath the Statue
of Liberty reminds us that the city’s greatness comes just as much from being
the landing site for “your tired, your poor, your huddled masses” that it is now
pricing out. One way to balance these two governmental imperatives — to help the
poor and generate tax revenue from the affluent — is to view the city as a
for-profit real estate development company wholly owned by a nonprofit
poverty-alleviation entity. The for-profit company focuses on keeping the city
attractive to the rich, and the revenue it generates gets plowed into schools
and support for the poor.

Cities thrived before the office was invented and can still triumph after the
office has gone. Unfettered by cubicles and 9-to-5 jobs, we could achieve, more
comprehensively and more joyfully than before, the city’s primordial aim:
bringing people and ideas together. We need this integrative urban power now
more than ever as social fragmentation, political polarization and economic
inequality pull us apart. As we face the climate crisis, the allure of
activity-rich neighborhoods could promote sustainable lifestyles. As we fight
segregation in all its forms, dense cities can bridge our divisions. As we
struggle with loneliness, an irresistibly vital street life could drag a
generation of people off their phones and back toward one another.



Illustrations by Kaylie Fairclough. Graphics by Jeremy Ashkenas and Quoctrung
Bui.


Read 727 Comments
 * Share full articleShare free access
 * 
 * 
 * 727



Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT




SITE INDEX




SITE INFORMATION NAVIGATION

 * © 2024 The New York Times Company

 * NYTCo
 * Contact Us
 * Accessibility
 * Work with us
 * Advertise
 * T Brand Studio
 * Your Ad Choices
 * Privacy Policy
 * Terms of Service
 * Terms of Sale
 * Site Map
 * Canada
 * International
 * Help
 * Subscriptions



Support independent journalism with a subscription. Already a subscriber? Log
in.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Enjoy unlimited access to all of The Times.
Includes news, games, recipes and more.
Welcome offer
$6.25 $1/week
Billed as $4 every 4 weeks for your first 6 months.
Cancel or pause anytime.
PayPal
OR

Check out with card


All Access includes news, plus Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter and The
Athletic.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Offer for a New York Times All Access subscription; current subscribers not
eligible. Subscription excludes print edition. Some games may be available
without a subscription. Your payment method will automatically be charged in
advance the introductory rate of $4.00 every 4 weeks for 6 months, and after 6
months the standard rate of $25.00 every 4 weeks. Your subscription will
continue until you cancel. Cancellation takes effect at the end of your current
billing period. Taxes may apply. Offer terms are subject to change.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

©2024 The New York Times Company

Help Feedback