www.sciencedirect.com
Open in
urlscan Pro
162.159.129.81
Public Scan
Submitted URL: http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1524-9042(17)30510-6/sref22
Effective URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1096219098000365
Submission: On January 26 via api from US — Scanned from DE
Effective URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1096219098000365
Submission: On January 26 via api from US — Scanned from DE
Form analysis
6 forms found in the DOMGET /search#submit
<form class="QuickSearch" action="/search#submit" method="get" aria-label="form"><input type="search" class="query" aria-label="Search ScienceDirect" name="qs" placeholder="Search ScienceDirect"><button class="button button-primary" type="submit"
aria-label="Submit search"><span class="button-text"><svg role="img" focusable="false" viewBox="0 0 100 128" height="20" width="18.75" class="icon icon-search" aria-label="Search">
<title>Search</title>
<path
d="m19.22 76.91c-5.84-5.84-9.05-13.6-9.05-21.85s3.21-16.01 9.05-21.85c5.84-5.83 13.59-9.05 21.85-9.05 8.25 0 16.01 3.22 21.84 9.05 5.84 5.84 9.05 13.6 9.05 21.85s-3.21 16.01-9.05 21.85c-5.83 5.83-13.59 9.05-21.84 9.05-8.26 0-16.01-3.22-21.85-9.05zm80.33 29.6l-26.32-26.32c5.61-7.15 8.68-15.9 8.68-25.13 0-10.91-4.25-21.17-11.96-28.88-7.72-7.71-17.97-11.96-28.88-11.96s-21.17 4.25-28.88 11.96c-7.72 7.71-11.97 17.97-11.97 28.88s4.25 21.17 11.97 28.88c7.71 7.71 17.97 11.96 28.88 11.96 9.23 0 17.98-3.07 25.13-8.68l26.32 26.32 7.03-7.03">
</path>
</svg></span></button><input type="hidden" name="origin" value="article"><input type="hidden" name="zone" value="qSearch"></form>
POST /getaccess/pii/S1526590013000369
<form class="side-panel-pdf-link" method="post" action="/getaccess/pii/S1526590013000369" target="sd-shopping-cart"><button class="button-link button-anchor button-link-primary" type="submit" rel="nofollow"><svg role="img" focusable="false"
viewBox="0 0 32 32" width="24" height="24" class="icon icon-pdf-multicolor" aria-label="PDF">
<title>PDF</title>
<path d="M7 .362h17.875l6.763 6.1V31.64H6.948V16z" stroke="#000" stroke-width=".703" fill="#fff"></path>
<path d="M.167 2.592H22.39V9.72H.166z" stroke="#aaa" stroke-width=".315" fill="#da0000"></path>
<path fill="#fff9f9"
d="M5.97 3.638h1.62c1.053 0 1.483.677 1.488 1.564.008.96-.6 1.564-1.492 1.564h-.644v1.66h-.977V3.64m.977.897v1.34h.542c.27 0 .596-.068.596-.673-.002-.6-.32-.667-.596-.667h-.542m3.8.036v2.92h.35c.933 0 1.223-.448 1.228-1.462.008-1.06-.316-1.45-1.23-1.45h-.347m-.977-.94h1.03c1.68 0 2.523.586 2.534 2.39.01 1.688-.607 2.4-2.534 2.4h-1.03V3.64m4.305 0h2.63v.934h-1.657v.894H16.6V6.4h-1.56v2.026h-.97V3.638">
</path>
<path
d="M19.462 13.46c.348 4.274-6.59 16.72-8.508 15.792-1.82-.85 1.53-3.317 2.92-4.366-2.864.894-5.394 3.252-3.837 3.93 2.113.895 7.048-9.25 9.41-15.394zM14.32 24.874c4.767-1.526 14.735-2.974 15.152-1.407.824-3.157-13.72-.37-15.153 1.407zm5.28-5.043c2.31 3.237 9.816 7.498 9.788 3.82-.306 2.046-6.66-1.097-8.925-4.164-4.087-5.534-2.39-8.772-1.682-8.732.917.047 1.074 1.307.67 2.442-.173-1.406-.58-2.44-1.224-2.415-1.835.067-1.905 4.46 1.37 9.065z"
fill="#f91d0a"></path>
</svg><span class="button-link-text">Purchase PDF</span></button></form>
POST /getaccess/pii/S096522991400185X
<form class="side-panel-pdf-link" method="post" action="/getaccess/pii/S096522991400185X" target="sd-shopping-cart"><button class="button-link button-anchor button-link-primary" type="submit" rel="nofollow"><svg role="img" focusable="false"
viewBox="0 0 32 32" width="24" height="24" class="icon icon-pdf-multicolor" aria-label="PDF">
<title>PDF</title>
<path d="M7 .362h17.875l6.763 6.1V31.64H6.948V16z" stroke="#000" stroke-width=".703" fill="#fff"></path>
<path d="M.167 2.592H22.39V9.72H.166z" stroke="#aaa" stroke-width=".315" fill="#da0000"></path>
<path fill="#fff9f9"
d="M5.97 3.638h1.62c1.053 0 1.483.677 1.488 1.564.008.96-.6 1.564-1.492 1.564h-.644v1.66h-.977V3.64m.977.897v1.34h.542c.27 0 .596-.068.596-.673-.002-.6-.32-.667-.596-.667h-.542m3.8.036v2.92h.35c.933 0 1.223-.448 1.228-1.462.008-1.06-.316-1.45-1.23-1.45h-.347m-.977-.94h1.03c1.68 0 2.523.586 2.534 2.39.01 1.688-.607 2.4-2.534 2.4h-1.03V3.64m4.305 0h2.63v.934h-1.657v.894H16.6V6.4h-1.56v2.026h-.97V3.638">
</path>
<path
d="M19.462 13.46c.348 4.274-6.59 16.72-8.508 15.792-1.82-.85 1.53-3.317 2.92-4.366-2.864.894-5.394 3.252-3.837 3.93 2.113.895 7.048-9.25 9.41-15.394zM14.32 24.874c4.767-1.526 14.735-2.974 15.152-1.407.824-3.157-13.72-.37-15.153 1.407zm5.28-5.043c2.31 3.237 9.816 7.498 9.788 3.82-.306 2.046-6.66-1.097-8.925-4.164-4.087-5.534-2.39-8.772-1.682-8.732.917.047 1.074 1.307.67 2.442-.173-1.406-.58-2.44-1.224-2.415-1.835.067-1.905 4.46 1.37 9.065z"
fill="#f91d0a"></path>
</svg><span class="button-link-text">Purchase PDF</span></button></form>
POST /getaccess/pii/S2095496418300177
<form class="side-panel-pdf-link" method="post" action="/getaccess/pii/S2095496418300177" target="sd-shopping-cart"><button class="button-link button-anchor button-link-primary" type="submit" rel="nofollow"><svg role="img" focusable="false"
viewBox="0 0 32 32" width="24" height="24" class="icon icon-pdf-multicolor" aria-label="PDF">
<title>PDF</title>
<path d="M7 .362h17.875l6.763 6.1V31.64H6.948V16z" stroke="#000" stroke-width=".703" fill="#fff"></path>
<path d="M.167 2.592H22.39V9.72H.166z" stroke="#aaa" stroke-width=".315" fill="#da0000"></path>
<path fill="#fff9f9"
d="M5.97 3.638h1.62c1.053 0 1.483.677 1.488 1.564.008.96-.6 1.564-1.492 1.564h-.644v1.66h-.977V3.64m.977.897v1.34h.542c.27 0 .596-.068.596-.673-.002-.6-.32-.667-.596-.667h-.542m3.8.036v2.92h.35c.933 0 1.223-.448 1.228-1.462.008-1.06-.316-1.45-1.23-1.45h-.347m-.977-.94h1.03c1.68 0 2.523.586 2.534 2.39.01 1.688-.607 2.4-2.534 2.4h-1.03V3.64m4.305 0h2.63v.934h-1.657v.894H16.6V6.4h-1.56v2.026h-.97V3.638">
</path>
<path
d="M19.462 13.46c.348 4.274-6.59 16.72-8.508 15.792-1.82-.85 1.53-3.317 2.92-4.366-2.864.894-5.394 3.252-3.837 3.93 2.113.895 7.048-9.25 9.41-15.394zM14.32 24.874c4.767-1.526 14.735-2.974 15.152-1.407.824-3.157-13.72-.37-15.153 1.407zm5.28-5.043c2.31 3.237 9.816 7.498 9.788 3.82-.306 2.046-6.66-1.097-8.925-4.164-4.087-5.534-2.39-8.772-1.682-8.732.917.047 1.074 1.307.67 2.442-.173-1.406-.58-2.44-1.224-2.415-1.835.067-1.905 4.46 1.37 9.065z"
fill="#f91d0a"></path>
</svg><span class="button-link-text">Purchase PDF</span></button></form>
POST /getaccess/pii/S0301051117301266
<form class="side-panel-pdf-link" method="post" action="/getaccess/pii/S0301051117301266" target="sd-shopping-cart"><button class="button-link button-anchor button-link-primary" type="submit" rel="nofollow"><svg role="img" focusable="false"
viewBox="0 0 32 32" width="24" height="24" class="icon icon-pdf-multicolor" aria-label="PDF">
<title>PDF</title>
<path d="M7 .362h17.875l6.763 6.1V31.64H6.948V16z" stroke="#000" stroke-width=".703" fill="#fff"></path>
<path d="M.167 2.592H22.39V9.72H.166z" stroke="#aaa" stroke-width=".315" fill="#da0000"></path>
<path fill="#fff9f9"
d="M5.97 3.638h1.62c1.053 0 1.483.677 1.488 1.564.008.96-.6 1.564-1.492 1.564h-.644v1.66h-.977V3.64m.977.897v1.34h.542c.27 0 .596-.068.596-.673-.002-.6-.32-.667-.596-.667h-.542m3.8.036v2.92h.35c.933 0 1.223-.448 1.228-1.462.008-1.06-.316-1.45-1.23-1.45h-.347m-.977-.94h1.03c1.68 0 2.523.586 2.534 2.39.01 1.688-.607 2.4-2.534 2.4h-1.03V3.64m4.305 0h2.63v.934h-1.657v.894H16.6V6.4h-1.56v2.026h-.97V3.638">
</path>
<path
d="M19.462 13.46c.348 4.274-6.59 16.72-8.508 15.792-1.82-.85 1.53-3.317 2.92-4.366-2.864.894-5.394 3.252-3.837 3.93 2.113.895 7.048-9.25 9.41-15.394zM14.32 24.874c4.767-1.526 14.735-2.974 15.152-1.407.824-3.157-13.72-.37-15.153 1.407zm5.28-5.043c2.31 3.237 9.816 7.498 9.788 3.82-.306 2.046-6.66-1.097-8.925-4.164-4.087-5.534-2.39-8.772-1.682-8.732.917.047 1.074 1.307.67 2.442-.173-1.406-.58-2.44-1.224-2.415-1.835.067-1.905 4.46 1.37 9.065z"
fill="#f91d0a"></path>
</svg><span class="button-link-text">Purchase PDF</span></button></form>
POST /getaccess/pii/S0197457213001821
<form class="side-panel-pdf-link" method="post" action="/getaccess/pii/S0197457213001821" target="sd-shopping-cart"><button class="button-link button-anchor button-link-primary" type="submit" rel="nofollow"><svg role="img" focusable="false"
viewBox="0 0 32 32" width="24" height="24" class="icon icon-pdf-multicolor" aria-label="PDF">
<title>PDF</title>
<path d="M7 .362h17.875l6.763 6.1V31.64H6.948V16z" stroke="#000" stroke-width=".703" fill="#fff"></path>
<path d="M.167 2.592H22.39V9.72H.166z" stroke="#aaa" stroke-width=".315" fill="#da0000"></path>
<path fill="#fff9f9"
d="M5.97 3.638h1.62c1.053 0 1.483.677 1.488 1.564.008.96-.6 1.564-1.492 1.564h-.644v1.66h-.977V3.64m.977.897v1.34h.542c.27 0 .596-.068.596-.673-.002-.6-.32-.667-.596-.667h-.542m3.8.036v2.92h.35c.933 0 1.223-.448 1.228-1.462.008-1.06-.316-1.45-1.23-1.45h-.347m-.977-.94h1.03c1.68 0 2.523.586 2.534 2.39.01 1.688-.607 2.4-2.534 2.4h-1.03V3.64m4.305 0h2.63v.934h-1.657v.894H16.6V6.4h-1.56v2.026h-.97V3.638">
</path>
<path
d="M19.462 13.46c.348 4.274-6.59 16.72-8.508 15.792-1.82-.85 1.53-3.317 2.92-4.366-2.864.894-5.394 3.252-3.837 3.93 2.113.895 7.048-9.25 9.41-15.394zM14.32 24.874c4.767-1.526 14.735-2.974 15.152-1.407.824-3.157-13.72-.37-15.153 1.407zm5.28-5.043c2.31 3.237 9.816 7.498 9.788 3.82-.306 2.046-6.66-1.097-8.925-4.164-4.087-5.534-2.39-8.772-1.682-8.732.917.047 1.074 1.307.67 2.442-.173-1.406-.58-2.44-1.224-2.415-1.835.067-1.905 4.46 1.37 9.065z"
fill="#f91d0a"></path>
</svg><span class="button-link-text">Purchase PDF</span></button></form>
Text Content
JavaScript is disabled on your browser. Please enable JavaScript to use all the features on this page. Skip to main content Skip to article ScienceDirect * Journals & Books * Help * Search RegisterSign in PDF View PDF * Access through your institution * Purchase PDF Search OUTLINE 1. Abstract 2. Keywords 3. Methods 4. Results 5. Discussion 6. Acknowledgements 7. References Show full outlineNavigate Down CITED BY (43) FIGURES (2) 1. 2. TABLES (3) 1. TableTable 1 2. TableTable 2 3. TableTable 3 INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE Volume 1, Issue 4, Autumn 1998, Pages 155-162 ORIGINAL RESEARCH EFFECTS OF THERAPEUTIC TOUCH IN REDUCING PAIN AND ANXIETY IN AN ELDERLY POPULATION Author links open overlay panelYu-ShenLinaBsnaMsnPHDaAnn GillTaylorMS, EDD, RNaPersonEnvelopeFaana Show moreNavigate Down ListOutlinePlusAdd to Mendeley ShareShare Cited ByCite https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-2190(98)00036-5Get rights and content ABSTRACT Background: Studies have revealed the high prevalence of chronic pain among the elderly. Anxiety is frequently associated with pain. This study investigated the efficacy of therapeutic touch (TT) in reducing chronic musculoskeletal pain and anxiety in an elderly population. Effects of TT were tested on three outcome variables: pain, anxiety, salivary cortisol. Methods: A pre–posttest, single-blind, randomized three-group design was used to compare effectiveness of TT to mimic touch (MT, a placebo), and standard care (SC). Ninety-five participants were recruited from seven facilities (retirement communities, nursing homes, adult day care and community senior centers), stratified by facility and randomized into one of three groups. Participants in TT group received a 20-min TT intervention; MT group participants received 20 min of mimic touch. Interventions were administered at the same time on 3 consecutive days at the participant’s facility. SC participants received only standard care. Pain was measured by an 11-point numeric rating scale. State anxiety was measured with Form Y-1 of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Salivary cortisol was analyzed using radioimmunoassay. Analysis of variance and Kruskal–Wallis Test were used for data analysis. Results: Ninety subjects completed the protocol. Pain reduction in TT group was significantly reduced (p < .001) when compared with control groups, effect size of 0.92. Anxiety in TT group was also significantly reduced (p < .01), effect size of 0.35. Salivary cortisol levels showed little change. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that TT is effective in reducing self-reported pain and anxiety in an elderly population. Physiological responses to TT need further study. * Navigate LeftPrevious article in issue * Next article in issueNavigate Right KEYWORDS alternative medicine therapeutic touch pain anxiety cortisol elderly Recommended articles CITED BY (43) * EFFECT OF THERAPEUTIC TOUCH ON SLEEP QUALITY AND ANXIETY IN INDIVIDUALS WITH CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL 2021, Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice Show abstractNavigate Down The purpose is to determine the effect of therapeutic touch (TT) on the sleep quality and anxiety of individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary (COPD) disease. 103 patients were randomized in to the two groups: the experimental group, and the control group. In this randomized control study, the patients with COPD in the experimental group were given TT for 10 min between 18:00 and 20:00, one session every day for three consecutive days. When the experimental group was compared to control group following the intervention, the decrease in the levels of anxiety (p < 0.001) and increase in the sleep quality (p < 0.001) were found to be significant. As a result of the study, it was determined that TT reduced anxiety level and improved sleep quality in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT04842903. * EFFECT OF EXPRESSIVE TOUCHING ON LABOUR PAIN AND MATERNAL SATISFACTION: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL 2019, Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice * THE EFFECT OF THERAPEUTIC TOUCH ON BACK PAIN IN ADULTS ON A NEUROLOGICAL UNIT: AN EXPERIMENTAL PILOT STUDY 2019, Pain Management Nursing Citation Excerpt : A study with 90 elderly residents from seven different facilities reported the effect of Therapeutic Touch in relieving chronic musculoskeletal pain. Pain intensity was measured with the numeric rating scale before and after the Therapeutic Touch treatment, and the mean difference was 5.93 (standard deviation [SD] ± 2.63) compared with the mimic Therapeutic Touch group (1.83, SD ± 2.55) with a significant major effect size of .92 (p < .001) (Lin & Taylor, 1998). Another randomized controlled study (McCormack, 2009) investigated the effect of Therapeutic Touch in 90 elderly postoperative participants receiving occupational therapy after total knee or hip replacement. Show abstractNavigate Down Chronic back pain affects many aspects of everyday life and is a common reason for medical visits, leading to high direct and indirect health care costs. Innovative and cost-effective nonpharmacologic pain management methods should be promoted to ensure adequate treatment. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate the pain-relieving effect of Therapeutic Touch in adult neurologic patients with back pain. A pretest–post-test randomized controlled trial. A university hospital in Austria. Patients with back pain diagnosis (N = 29) on hospital admission. A pilot study was conducted for 3 months. The control group (n = 14) received the pharmacologic pain management recommended by the World Health Organization; patients in the intervention group (n = 15) received additionally four Therapeutic Touch treatments on 4 consecutive days. The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale were used as outcome measures to evaluate activity domains affected by back pain and pain intensity. Pain improvement was found in the intervention group according to the mean score of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (day 1: 72.53, standard deviation [SD] ± 14.10; day 4: 39.47, SD ± 8.77; p < .001). The Numerical Pain Rating Scale score averaged 4.33 points (SD ± 2.09) on the first day and 2.47 points (SD ± 1.12) on the fourth day. The long-term effect of Therapeutic Touch was significant and indicated a major effect (Pillai's trace = .641, F(3.12) = 7.1, p = .005, ηp2 = .641). Therapeutic Touch seems to be a noninvasive nursing intervention for back pain management to provide more professional patient care. * IS ENERGY HEALING AN EFFECTIVE NON-PHARMACOLOGICAL THERAPY FOR IMPROVING SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT OF CHRONIC ILLNESSES? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW 2016, Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice Citation Excerpt : Healers that were not restricted in their practice were utilised in 20 studies of which 9 generated significant results [29,31,32,35,37,39,43,49,53,56]. Directed healing towards a specific health outcome or well-being was used in 18 studies of which nine demonstrated a significant result [28,31,32,37–39,45,48,49]. Verbal communication prior to energy healing at a distance [35,53] or contact energy healing [28,29,32,37,48] took place between healer and recipient in six studies with significant outcomes, however, verbal communication was not used during the intervention period in seven studies with significant results [12,31,38,39,43,45,49,56]. Show abstractNavigate Down Emerging evidence suggests that some people living with non-communicable diseases (NCDs) have integrated energy healing into their self-management strategy, however little is known about its efficacy. To identify energy healing interventions that impacted positively on the symptom management outcomes for patients living in the community with various NCDs. A systematic review of energy healing interventions for the management of non-communicable disease related symptoms, conducted between 01 January 2000 and 21 April 2015, published in an English peer-reviewed journal. This review conforms to the PRISMA statement. Twenty seven studies were identified that evaluated various energy healing interventions involving 3159 participants. Thirteen of the energy healing trials generated statistically significant outcomes. Energy healing has demonstrated some improvement in illness symptoms, however high level evidence consistently demonstrating efficacy is lacking. Further more robust trials are required to better understand which elements of energy healing interventions are associated with positive outcomes. * HUMAN BIOFIELD THERAPY DOES NOT AFFECT TUMOR SIZE BUT MODULATES IMMUNE RESPONSES IN A MOUSE MODEL FOR BREAST CANCER 2016, Journal of Integrative Medicine Show abstractNavigate Down To assess the effect of human biofield therapy, an integrative medicine modality, on the development of tumors and metastasis, and immune function in a mouse breast cancer model. Mice were injected with 66cl4 mammary carcinoma cells. In study one, mice received biofield therapy after cell injection. In study two, mice were treated by the biofield practitioner only prior to cell injection. Both studies had two control groups of mock biofield treatments and phosphate-buffered saline injection. Mice were weighed and tumor volume was determined. Blood samples were collected and 32 serum cytokine/chemokine markers were measured. Spleens/popliteal lymph nodes were isolated and dissociated for fluorescent-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis of immune cells or metastasis assays in cell culture. No significant differences were found in weight, tumor size or metastasis. Significant effects were found in the immune responses in study one but no additional effects were found in study two. In study one, human biofield treatment significantly reduced percentage of CD4+CD44loCD25+ and percentage of CD8+ cells, elevated by cancer in the lymph nodes, to control levels determined by FACS analysis. In the spleen, only CD11b+ macrophages were increased with cancer, and human biofield therapy significantly reduced them. Of 11 cytokines elevated by cancer, only interferon-γ, interleukin-1, monokine induced by interferon-γ, interleukin-2 and macrophage inflammatory protein-2 were significantly reduced to control levels with human biofield therapy. Human biofield therapy had no significant effect on tumor size or metastasis but produced significant effects on immune responses apparent in the down-regulation of specific lymphocytes and serum cytokines in a mouse breast cancer model. * EFFECTIVENESS OF IMPLEMENTING THE REIKI METHOD TO REDUCE THE WEANING FAILURE. A CLINICAL TRIAL 2016, Enfermeria Intensiva Show abstractNavigate Down El ingreso en cuidados intensivos (UCI) supone para el paciente un momento difícil y estresante, con la aplicación de diferentes técnicas, como la intubación y la retirada del soporte ventilatorio o «destete» que puede fracasar debido a la ansiedad. Determinar si el reiki es útil para disminuir el fracaso en el destete; así como para disminuir el número de días de ventilación mecánica (VM), días de estancia en la UCI, cantidad de sedantes, aminas y antipsicóticos. Ensayo clínico aleatorizado. ÿmbito: UCI de un hospital universitario de nivel iii. Población: pacientes de UCI conectados a VM más de 48 h, con el consentimiento firmado. Excluimos a pacientes en situación terminal o potencial donante de órganos. Muestra: 256 pacientes, divididos en 2 grupos: grupo intervención (GI) y placebo (GP). La intervención consiste en la aplicación de reiki y el grupo placebo simulaba la técnica. Analizamos las frecuencias absolutas y relativas, el nivel de significación de p < 0,05, IC del 95%. El porcentaje de fracasos en el destete ha sido de un 9% en el GI y un 9,5% en el GP (p = 0,42). Los días de VM 8,85 GI y 9,66 GP (p = 0,53). La media de sedantes: 1.078 mg GI y 1.491 mg GP. La media de mg de haloperidol fue menor en el GI (5,30 mg vs. 16,.81 mg GP); p = 0,03; IC del 95%, 21,9, 1,13. El reiki disminuye la agitación de los pacientes. Objetivamos una disminución de días de ventilación mecánica, días de estancia, menor dosis de fármacos sedantes y una discreta disminución del fracaso en el GI. No encontramos significación estadística en la variable principal. Admission to intensive care unit (ICU) is a difficult and stressful time for the patient, with the application of different techniques, such as intubation and ventilation support withdrawal or weaning, which may fail due to anxiety. To determine whether Reiki is useful in reducing weaning failure, as well as reducing the number of days of mechanical ventilation (MV), length of stay in ICU, amount of sedatives, amines, and antipsychotics. Randomized clinical trial. Scope: ICU of a Level III University Hospital. Population: ICU patients connected to Mechanical Ventilation for more than 48 hours, with a signed informed consent. Patients in a terminal condition or potential organ donors were excluded. Sample: 256 patients divided into two groups: intervention group (GI) and placebo (GP). The intervention involves the application of Reiki, and a simulated technique within the placebo group. An analysis was made of the absolute and relative frequencies, with a significance level of P<.05, 95% CI The percentage of failures at weaning was 9% in GI and 9.5% in GP (P=.42). The mean number of days on MV was 8.85 days for GI and 9.66 for the GP (P=.53). The mean dose of sedatives: GI 1078 mg and 1491 mg GP. The dose of Haloperidol was lower in the GI (5.30 mg vs 16.81 mg GP) (P=.03, 95% CI; -21.9 to -1.13). Reiki reduces the agitation of patients. A decrease was objectively observed in the number of days of Mechanical Ventilation, length of stay, lower doses of sedatives, and a slight decrease in the weaning failure in the GI. No statistically significant difference was found in the main variable. Arrow Up and RightView all citing articles on Scopus View full text Copyright © 1999 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved. RECOMMENDED ARTICLES Navigate Down * C-TACTILE FIBERS CONTRIBUTE TO CUTANEOUS ALLODYNIA AFTER ECCENTRIC EXERCISE The Journal of Pain, Volume 14, Issue 5, 2013, pp. 538-548 PDFPurchase PDF View detailsNavigate Down * A CASE-CONTROL, MONO-CENTER, OPEN-LABEL, PILOT STUDY TO EVALUATE THE FEASIBILITY OF THERAPEUTIC TOUCH IN PREVENTING RADIATION DERMATITIS IN WOMEN WITH BREAST CANCER RECEIVING ADJUVANT RADIATION THERAPY Complementary Therapies in Medicine, Volume 23, Issue 4, 2015, pp. 612-616 PDFPurchase PDF View detailsNavigate Down * EFFECTS OF LAYING ON OF HANDS WITH AND WITHOUT A SPIRITUAL CONTEXT ON PAIN AND FUNCTIONALITY OF OLDER WOMEN WITH KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS: STUDY PROTOCOL FOR A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL Journal of Integrative Medicine, Volume 16, Issue 2, 2018, pp. 106-112 PDFPurchase PDF View detailsNavigate Down * HEART RATE VARIABILITY IS ENHANCED BY LONG-LASTING PLEASANT TOUCH AT CT-OPTIMIZED VELOCITY Biological Psychology, Volume 128, 2017, pp. 71-81 PDFPurchase PDF View detailsNavigate Down * ANALGESIC EFFECTS OF MANUAL THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Manual Therapy, Volume 20, Issue 2, 2015, pp. 250-256 View detailsNavigate Down * THE EFFECT OF HEALING TOUCH ON THE PAIN AND MOBILITY OF PERSONS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS: A FEASIBILITY STUDY Geriatric Nursing, Volume 34, Issue 4, 2013, pp. 314-322 PDFPurchase PDF View detailsNavigate Down 12NextNavigate Right ARTICLE METRICS Navigate Down Citations * Citation Indexes: 43 * Policy Citations: 1 Captures * Exports-Saves: 6 * Readers: 43 Social Media * Shares, Likes & Comments: 1 View details * About ScienceDirect * Remote access * Shopping cart * Advertise * Contact and support * Terms and conditions * Privacy policy We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content and ads. By continuing you agree to the use of cookies. Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. or its licensors or contributors. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.