fortune.com Open in urlscan Pro
18.67.76.126  Public Scan

URL: https://fortune.com/2024/01/19/kansas-flat-tax-approved-republican-legislature-democratic-governor-veto/amp/
Submission: On January 20 via manual from US — Scanned from US

Form analysis 1 forms found in the DOM

GET https://fortune.com/advanced-search

<form class="queryly-form i-amphtml-form" action="https://fortune.com/advanced-search" target="_top" method="get" novalidate="">
  <input class="queryly-input" name="query" value="" placeholder="Search Fortune...">
  <input class="queryly-submit" type="submit" value="Search">
</form>

Text Content

Dismiss Close
Fortune
Cookies and Related Technologies on This Site
Please choose whether this site may use cookies or related technologies such as
web beacons, pixel tags, and Flash objects (“Cookies”) as described below. You
can learn more about how this site uses cookies and related technologies by
reading our privacy policy linked below.
Accept Reject
Privacy Policy

Ad


Fortune Fortune
search
Subscribe Now
 * Rankings
 * Magazine
 * Newsletters
 * Podcasts
 * Video On Demand
 * Fortune Live Media
 * CEO Initiative
 * Fortune Connect
 * Fortune Education
 * Fortune Well
 * Fortune Crypto
 * Fortune Recommends


Politics Taxes


KANSAS’ WEALTHIEST 3.8% PAYS 41% OF ITS TAXES AND GOP LAWMAKERS ARE BATTLING
WITH THE DEMOCRATIC GOVERNOR OVER A HUGE NEW CUT


THE GOP-SUPERMAJORITY HAS APPROVED A 'FLAT TAX' PLAN TO CUT INCOME, SALES AND
PROPERTY TAXES BY NEARLY $1.6 BILLION OVER THE NEXT THREE YEARS.

BY
John Hanna
 AND 
The Associated Press
January 19, 2024 1:14 PM EST

Kansas state Rep. Susan Concannon, R-Beloit, confers with Rep. Susan Humphries,
R-Wichita, during a House debate on a Republican plan for cutting taxes,
Thursday, Jan. 18, 2024, at the Statehouse in Topeka, Kan. AP Photo/John Hanna

Republican lawmakers in Kansas on Thursday passed a broad package of tax cuts
promoted as widespread relief that the Democratic governor is likely to veto
because she says it favors the wealthy and threatens the state’s budget in the
future.

Subscribe to unlock this article and get full access to Fortune.com

Try for $1

Already a member? Login

Republican lawmakers in Kansas on Thursday passed a broad package of tax cuts
promoted as widespread relief that the Democratic governor is likely to veto
because she says it favors the wealthy and threatens the state’s budget in the
future.



The opposing viewpoints kept the two sides locked in a political impasse as the
window for meaningful tax cuts narrows.



The GOP-supermajority Legislature approved a plan to cut income, sales and
property taxes by a total of nearly $1.6 billion over the next three years. But
Gov. Laura Kelly is expected to veto the bill because it would move Kansas to a
single personal income tax rate of 5.25% to replace three rates that now top out
at 5.7%.

The measure cleared the Legislature on an 81-37 vote in the House after the
Senate approved it Wednesday, 25-11. While Republicans appeared to have the
two-thirds majority in the House to override a veto, the defections of two
Republicans and a conservative independent in the Senate appear to leave them at
least a vote short there.



A similar dispute thwarted big tax cuts last year, when a dozen other states cut
taxes, according to the conservative-leaning Tax Foundation.



Kelly’s office wasn’t commenting Thursday, but she’s been public about her
strong opposition to the “flat” tax proposal, viewing it as a boon to the
state’s “super wealthy.” Also, her office released a projection Thursday showing
that the GOP plan would cause a budget shortfall in 2029.

Democratic state Rep. Henry Helgerson of Wichita argued during Thursday’s debate
that lawmakers cannot enact the Republicans’ tax cuts without committing to
budget cuts first.

“Right now, I don’t see it,” he said.



The figures released by Kelly’s office didn’t show what assumptions it used for
growth in spending or revenues over time, and Republicans dismissed them. Senate
President Ty Masterson, a Wichita-area Republican, said he agrees that the state
faces future budget problems if Kelly wants to “spend like a drunken sailor.”

“However, if the state engages in basic fiscal responsibility, there will
continue to be ample money available to deliver ongoing and meaningful tax
reductions to Kansans,” Masterson said in an emailed statement Thursday.

Republicans also defended their package as fair because it contains provisions
that will exempt roughly 310,000 additional Kansas residents from income taxes,
on top of the 40,000 or so poorest ones. The plan included provisions that would
exempt the first $20,300 of a married couple’s income from state taxes — more if
they have children, with the amounts rising with inflation after 2025.



Republican leaders married the income tax proposals to a proposal from Kelly to
eliminate the state’s 2% sales tax on groceries starting April 1 and proposals
she embraced to exempt all of retirees’ Social Security income from taxes and to
lower homeowners’ property taxes.

“It’s a great package,” Republican state Sen. Caryn Tyson, the Senate tax
committee’s chair, said before Wednesday’s vote in her chamber. “It’s got a
little something for everybody.”

The impasse last year over taxes had Kansas projecting that it will have nearly
$4.5 billion in surplus cash at the end of June, equal to 17% of the state’s
current $25 billion budget.



Yet Kansas also is debating tax cuts at a time when the nationwide tax-cutting
trend could be slowing as a revenue surge fueled by federal spending and
inflation recedes.

Kansas’ state tax collections are in line with last year’s but about 1.1% below
projections. Monthly collections have fallen short of expectations each of the
past three months; that happened only five times in the previous six years.

“This is a time when state revenues and surpluses, we’re seeing, are starting to
flatten across the country,” said Neva Butkus, a state policy analyst for the
left-leaning Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy.



Butkus also said that, even with its provisions aimed at helping poor families,
the GOP package would widen the gap between the poorest, who already pay a
higher percentage of their incomes in taxes, and the wealthiest.

Figures from the Kansas Department of Revenue show that with the proposed
single-rate tax, a little more than half of the raw dollar savings would go to
the 3.8% of filers from Kansas earning more than $250,000 a year. That group
pays 41% of the personal income taxes collected from Kansas residents.

The smallest cuts, both in terms of raw dollars and the average percentage,
would go to Kansas residents earning between $50,000 and $75,000 a year.



“Not only does it help the wealthy, it does nothing for the middle class,” said
state Rep. Tom Sawyer, another Wichita Democrat.

But many Republicans argued that a simpler income tax system is fairer and said
Kansas needs to become more competitive with other states. The Tax Foundation
said in a 2022 report that Kansas residents pay more of their incomes in taxes
than residents of most surrounding states.

In 2022, Iowa moved to a flat tax, initially set at 4.4% but scheduled to drop
eventually to 3.9%. Now, GOP Gov. Kim Reynolds is pushing to cut the rate to
$3.65% for this year.



Masterson said retaining an income tax with multiple rates would keep Kansas
“behind the eight ball” economically.

“It’s not the future,” he said.

___

Associated Press writer Hannah Fingerhut in Des Moines, Iowa, contributed to
this report.





MOST POPULAR IN POLITICS

 * Politics
   Years after Trump’s White House vowed to destroy the administrative state, 2
   of his Supreme Court appointees look poised to strike a big blow
   January 18, 2024
   BY  Mark Sherman ,  Irina Ivanova  AND  The Associated Press

 * --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 * Politics
   Kansas’ wealthiest 3.8% pays 41% of its taxes and GOP lawmakers are battling
   with the Democratic governor over a huge new cut
   January 19, 2024
   BY  John Hanna  AND  The Associated Press

 * --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 * Politics
   ‘The same values are at stake here’: Disney rips DeSantis in court filing
   after appeals court revives First Amendment retaliation case
   January 16, 2024
   BY  Mike Schneider  AND  The Associated Press

 * --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 * Politics
   Business tax breaks and an enhanced child tax credit are on the menu as
   bipartisan group of lawmakers push to pass bill before IRS season
   January 17, 2024
   BY  Kevin Freking  AND  The Associated Press

Rankings

 * 40 Under 40
 * 100 Best Companies
 * Fortune 500
 * Global 500

 * Most Powerful Women
 * World’s Greatest Leaders
 * World’s Most Admired Companies
 * See All Rankings

Sections

 * Finance
 * Leadership
 * Success
 * Tech

 * Asia
 * Europe
 * Environment
 * Fortune Crypto

 * Health
 * Well
 * Retail
 * Lifestyle
 * Politics

 * Newsletters
 * Magazine
 * Features
 * Commentary

 * MPW
 * CEO Initiative
 * Conferences
 * Personal Finance
 * Recommends
 * Coupons

Customer Support

 * Frequently Asked Questions
 * Customer Service Portal
 * Privacy Policy
 * Terms of Use
 * Single Issues for Purchase
 * International Print

Commercial Services

 * Fortune Brand Studio
 * Fortune Analytics
 * Fortune Conferences
 * Advertising
 * Business Development

About Us

 * About Us
 * Editorial Calendar
 * Work at Fortune
 * Behavioral Advertising Notice
 * Terms and Conditions
 * Site Map

 * Facebook
 * Twitter
 * Linked
 * Instagram
 * Pinterest

© 2022 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site
constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at
Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information | Ad
Choices 
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and
other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and
services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
S&P Index data is the property of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. and its
licensors. All rights reserved. Terms & Conditions. Powered and implemented by
Interactive Data Managed Solutions.