thermaltoy.wordpress.com
Open in
urlscan Pro
192.0.78.13
Public Scan
Submitted URL: https://tomhartley.me.uk/
Effective URL: https://thermaltoy.wordpress.com/
Submission: On November 19 via api from US — Scanned from DE
Effective URL: https://thermaltoy.wordpress.com/
Submission: On November 19 via api from US — Scanned from DE
Form analysis
3 forms found in the DOMGET https://thermaltoy.wordpress.com/
<form role="search" method="get" class="search-form" action="https://thermaltoy.wordpress.com/">
<label>
<span class="screen-reader-text"> Search for: </span>
<input type="search" class="search-field" placeholder="Search …" value="" name="s">
</label>
<button type="submit" class="search-submit"><span class="screen-reader-text"> Search </span></button>
</form>
POST https://subscribe.wordpress.com
<form method="post" action="https://subscribe.wordpress.com" accept-charset="utf-8" style="display: none;">
<div class="actnbr-follow-count">Join 37 other subscribers</div>
<div>
<input type="email" name="email" placeholder="Enter your email address" class="actnbr-email-field" aria-label="Enter your email address">
</div>
<input type="hidden" name="action" value="subscribe">
<input type="hidden" name="blog_id" value="33818963">
<input type="hidden" name="source" value="https://thermaltoy.wordpress.com/">
<input type="hidden" name="sub-type" value="actionbar-follow">
<input type="hidden" id="_wpnonce" name="_wpnonce" value="b4d8f5be3a">
<div class="actnbr-button-wrap">
<button type="submit" value="Sign me up"> Sign me up </button>
</div>
</form>
<form id="jp-carousel-comment-form">
<label for="jp-carousel-comment-form-comment-field" class="screen-reader-text">Write a Comment...</label>
<textarea name="comment" class="jp-carousel-comment-form-field jp-carousel-comment-form-textarea" id="jp-carousel-comment-form-comment-field" placeholder="Write a Comment..."></textarea>
<div id="jp-carousel-comment-form-submit-and-info-wrapper">
<div id="jp-carousel-comment-form-commenting-as">
<fieldset>
<label for="jp-carousel-comment-form-email-field">Email (Required)</label>
<input type="text" name="email" class="jp-carousel-comment-form-field jp-carousel-comment-form-text-field" id="jp-carousel-comment-form-email-field">
</fieldset>
<fieldset>
<label for="jp-carousel-comment-form-author-field">Name (Required)</label>
<input type="text" name="author" class="jp-carousel-comment-form-field jp-carousel-comment-form-text-field" id="jp-carousel-comment-form-author-field">
</fieldset>
<fieldset>
<label for="jp-carousel-comment-form-url-field">Website</label>
<input type="text" name="url" class="jp-carousel-comment-form-field jp-carousel-comment-form-text-field" id="jp-carousel-comment-form-url-field">
</fieldset>
</div>
<input type="submit" name="submit" class="jp-carousel-comment-form-button" id="jp-carousel-comment-form-button-submit" value="Post Comment">
</div>
</form>
Text Content
Skip to content THERMALTOY (it's an anagram of my name: Tom Hartley) Menu * Publications * About INTERESTING TIMES I first set up this site in 2012. In retrospect that was a watershed year for me and for the UK, an optimistic time where we could look forward to the possibilities of a better life in the new century. To put in mildly the intervening 12 years have not delivered on that optimism. We had a prolonged period of economic austerity (it’s still going on), Brexit and then the pandemic. We had years of shambolic government. Tom Hartley, April 2024 – I didn’t cut it during the pandemic/lockdown period Tom Hartley, September 2024 – my last day at the University of York before retiring at the end of the month. Beyond the UK the world is looking less friendly. We have the continuing existential threats from nuclear conflict and the effects of climate change, nearer now rather than further away as we might have hoped. Russia has reverted to its old isolation and expansionism while the older democracies and alliances are polarized and crumbling. AI has arrived and although the potential positive applications are exciting, they are being outpaced by darker developments both deliberate and accidental. In the wrong hands, AI can be a potent tool in undermining human wellbeing and in creating or exacerbating division. It undermines human wellbeing when it helps corporations optimize our economy for (concentrated) profit at the expense of (distributed) happiness. And it can be used to create or exacerbate division by creating, highlighting and distributing misinformation and disinformation, manipulating our emotions and undermining trust. Used carelessly, it typically amplifies human or corporate biases. And generative AI can appropriate human creative work without attribution or compensation, meaning that human creativity is devalued. I think that over the next few years we will increasingly need the reassurance that the people we deal with are living breathing human beings acting on their own free will. The best evidence will be meeting people face-to-face and (for cultural activities – art, music, comedy, sport) seeing them live, in the flesh. When I first started this blog, I wrote posts about my life and work in science and academia. I’ve hidden most of these although some of them were quite interesting, so I may bring them back. Some seemed a bit earnest, too optimistic or prescriptive for the more cynical and less friendly world we now find ourselves in. At the moment the main purpose of this site is to verify my online identity as an actual human being with a backstory (see the About page for more details). I may decide to start blogging again, but at the moment I will be posting to Bluesky which, for me, has taken the place of Twitter/X. I was an earlyish adopter of Twitter and my 10,000th Tweet was in March 2013. The experience gradually degenerated over the last 3 or 4 years (partly due to the misinformation and increasingly divisive algorithms it employed), but I am currently finding Bluesky as positive and useful as early Twitter. I made lots of new friends and built trusted connections with many people there. Together we learned a lot about how trust can be developed through honest and thoughtful online interactions, and how it can be undermined by less thoughtful reactions, by carelessly sharing misinformation and by succumbing to easily to destructive and polarizing influences. So I will be taking that experience onto the new platform and trying to link up with other people with a similar outlook. I think we’ll need trusted online networks more than ever. A big change in own my life is that I’ve retired, meaning I’ll be posting less about science and academia in the future. I don’t rule out a return to some kind of work in the future – there are quite a few interesting options for someone with my background. In the mean time I’ll be posting more about my hobbies which include coding (including AI, because it’s not entirely evil) and recording music. At the moment I am trying to learn to play the drums. I am trying to write a song-a-day thread about the Beatles on Bluesky. Author tomhartleyPosted on November 19, 2024Categories Uncategorized MEN: WHEN TO STAND UP, WHEN TO PIPE DOWN Based on what I have learned so far by listening to women. If you work in science or technology and spend any time listening to the honest views of women around you, you will find that many report experiences of sexism and an environment that is hostile to them. Listen to them. Men sometimes undervalue women’s views, ideas and experiences, talk over them and shut them out of discussion, even in discussions about sex, gender and discrimination where they clearly have vital, distinct experiences and knowledge. Don’t drown out their voices. When you see that other men are not listening to women’s experiences, are drowning out their contributions, dismissing their concerns or derailing discussions they have initiated, what should you do? You will need tact and judgement to determine whether your support is truly helpful – for example, if you get drawn into a predominantly male argument it is surprisingly be easy to become part of the problem, rather than the solution. Women’s ideas are sometimes dismissed, ignored or doubted until expressed by a man. If you want to amplify, echo or support a woman’s view, it can be helpful to make it explicit. “I would like to amplify what Dr X has said”, “I agree with Dr X”. This avoids any impression that you are taking credit for her idea, and it helps remind other men to listen to women.* When you see overt sexism or misogyny, yes, you should speak up. Confront it. This is going to take some judgement, sometimes we need to stand up, often we need to pipe down. In both cases it will feel uncomfortable, in my view, that male discomfort is the feeling you get when a sexist culture is changing for the better. Note: I have focused on women and sexism, but if you look around you will find other groups are under-represented and marginalized in your workplace. Try the same techniques: listen to the people affected, then try to advocate for change that will improve matters. *In this spirit I should acknowledge the people whose ideas I have incorporated in the above advice who most recently and directly include @zerdeve (especially this thread), @o_guest (twitter) and @noodlemaz (blog and twitter) although many others have expressed similar views. Misunderstandings or mistakes are my own. The tip about explicitly acknowledging women whose views you agree with and want to amplify was arrived at by trial and (especially) error – one error pointed out gracefully (but forcefully) by Prof Ursula Martin was helpful. Of course, I like other-well intentioned men, will make mistakes in the way we respond to women’s concerns about sexism. Author tomhartleyPosted on August 11, 2017February 17, 2021Categories UncategorizedLeave a comment on Men: when to stand up, when to pipe down RHYTHM AND MEMORY FOR SPEECH This post was co-written with my fellow authors Mark Hurlstone and Graham Hitch. Today we published an important paper in Cognitive Psychology. The paper is significant because it explains a link between rhythm and memory in terms of a common mechanism that connects speech processing, verbal learning and language development to rhythmic oscillations in brain activity. Continue reading “Rhythm and Memory for Speech” Author tomhartleyPosted on June 2, 2016September 22, 2016Categories Research, Science2 Comments on Rhythm and Memory for Speech FIRST IMPRESSIONS COUNT, BUT HOW? Today we published a paper in PNAS about how people form first impressions based on everyday images of faces, of the kind you find on the internet. The four authors (L-R), Richard Vernon, Clare Sutherland, Andy Young and Tom Hartley – we also co-wrote this blog post. Underneath are reconstructions of photos of our faces which can be loosely thought of illustrating the way such images are “seen” by our model. They are actually reconstructions based on the 65 numbers we used to describe each face, using a model trained on a large number of such images (but not these ones). Note the subtle differences in shape between the photos and the reconstructed image – the features we use do not (yet) capture some of the information in the images, but sufficient for the model to make accurate predictions about social impressions. By first impressions we mean the way we rapidly form judgements about others’ social characteristics. Although we can make an astonishing range of social inferences based on appearance (trustworthiness, intelligence, dominance, extraversion etc.) these different traits tend to go together in predictable ways, so that they fall along two or three more or less independent underlying dimensions: * approachability (do they want to help me or to harm me?) * dominance (are they capable of carrying out these intentions?) * youthful-attractiveness (perhaps representing whether they’d be a good romantic partner – or a rival!) These judgements are formed very quickly (in as little as a tenth of a second) and can influence our subsequent behaviour. The impressions we create through images of our faces (“avatars”/“selfies”) are increasingly important in a world where, more and more, we get to know one another online rather than in the flesh. So how can we go from an image of a face to a judgement about someone’s character? Continue reading “First Impressions Count, But How?” Author tomhartleyPosted on July 28, 2014November 7, 2014Categories ScienceTags faces, models6 Comments on First Impressions Count, But How? POSTS PAGINATION Page 1 Page 2 Next page RECENT POSTS * Interesting Times * Men: when to stand up, when to pipe down * Rhythm and Memory for Speech * First Impressions Count, But How? * Dr Who or Professor Who? On Academic Email Etiquette Search for: Search BROWSE * Personal Perspective (1) * Science (6) * "philosophy" – small p (1) * Communication and Engagement (1) * Research (3) * Uncategorized (2) ARCHIVES * November 2024 * August 2017 * June 2016 * July 2014 * January 2013 * October 2011 * September 2011 "philosophy" - small p Communication and Engagement Personal Perspective Research Science Uncategorized TAGS * entorhinal cortex * faces * grid cells * hippocampal formation * hippocampus * IAS2010 * models * neurons * philosophy * place cells * space TWITTER (@TOM_HARTLEY) Tweets by tom_hartley BLOG STATS * 148,924 hits RESEARCH Tom Hartley Google Scholar Profile * Publications * About ThermalToy Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com. ThermalToy Blog at WordPress.com. * Subscribe Subscribed * ThermalToy Join 37 other subscribers Sign me up * Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now. * Privacy * * ThermalToy * Customize * Subscribe Subscribed * Sign up * Log in * Report this content * View site in Reader * Manage subscriptions * Collapse this bar Loading Comments... Write a Comment... Email (Required) Name (Required) Website Design a site like this with WordPress.com Get started