www.pbs.org Open in urlscan Pro
2600:9000:206f:a400:0:3833:24c0:93a1  Public Scan

Submitted URL: https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/film/un-sex-abuse-scandal/C
Effective URL: https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/cadmium-spiked-inside-tampa-lead-factory-workers-didnt-get-help/
Submission: On December 17 via api from US — Scanned from DE

Form analysis 8 forms found in the DOM

GET https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/?q=

<form id="pbs_distribution_search_form" accept-charset="UTF-8" method="get" action="https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/?q=">
  <div class="pbs_searchtext_wrap">
    <input name="q" type="text" id="header_query" value="" placeholder="Search" data-type="local" aria-label="Search">
    <span aria-hidden="true">
      <span class="pbs_lens_icon"></span>
    </span>
  </div>
  <div class="pbs_searchbuttons_wrap">
    <input type="button" class="search_btn" id="btnLocalSearch" data-type="local" value="Search This Site">
    <input type="button" class="search_btn" id="btnGlobalSearch" data-type="global" value="Search PBS">
  </div>
</form>

GET https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/

<form action="https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/" method="get">
  <input type="text" placeholder="search Frontline" name="q" class="site-search__input" id="site-search" value="" required="">
  <button class="site-search__button button--site-search" value="Submit">
    <i class="site-search__icon icon-search-icon-white"></i>
  </button>
</form>

POST //links.iterable.com/lists/addSubscriberForm?emailListId=358856

<form action="//links.iterable.com/lists/addSubscriberForm?emailListId=358856" method="post" data-id="global-signup" data-ga-label="follow">
  <input type="hidden" name="elqFormName" value="nps_email_signup">
  <input type="hidden" name="elqSiteID" value="2531">
  <input type="hidden" name="program_src" value="frontline">
  <input type="hidden" name="News_Frontline_Beta" value="1">
  <input type="hidden" name="success_page" value="https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/newsletter-subscriptions/thanks/">
  <input type="email" placeholder="Your email address" name="email" id="newsletter-email">
  <button class="button-alt" value="Submit">Subscribe</button>
</form>

POST //links.iterable.com/lists/addSubscriberForm?emailListId=358856

<form action="//links.iterable.com/lists/addSubscriberForm?emailListId=358856" method="post" data-ga-label="article">
  <input type="hidden" name="success_page" value="https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/newsletter-subscriptions/thanks/">
  <input type="email" placeholder="Your email address" name="email" id="newsletter-email">
  <input class="newsletter__input newsletter__input--zip" type="text" placeholder="Your zip code" name="zipOrPostal">
  <button class="button-alt" value="Submit">Get Our Newsletter</button>
</form>

POST //links.iterable.com/lists/addSubscriberForm?emailListId=358856

<form action="//links.iterable.com/lists/addSubscriberForm?emailListId=358856" method="post" data-id="global-signup" data-ga-label="follow">
  <input type="hidden" name="elqFormName" value="nps_email_signup">
  <input type="hidden" name="elqSiteID" value="2531">
  <input type="hidden" name="program_src" value="frontline">
  <input type="hidden" name="News_Frontline_Beta" value="1">
  <input type="hidden" name="success_page" value="https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/newsletter-subscriptions/thanks/">
  <input type="email" placeholder="Your email address" name="email" id="newsletter-email">
  <button class="button-alt" value="Submit">Subscribe</button>
</form>

POST //links.iterable.com/lists/addSubscriberForm?emailListId=358856

<form action="//links.iterable.com/lists/addSubscriberForm?emailListId=358856" method="post" data-ga-label="modal">
  <input type="hidden" name="elqFormName" value="nps_email_signup">
  <input type="hidden" name="elqSiteID" value="2531">
  <input type="hidden" name="program_src" value="frontline">
  <input type="hidden" name="News_Frontline_Beta" value="1">
  <input type="hidden" name="success_page" value="https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/newsletter-subscriptions/thanks/">
  <input class="newsletter__input newsletter__input--email" type="email" required="" oninvalid="this.setCustomValidity('Please provide a valid email address.')" placeholder="Your email address" name="email">
  <input class="newsletter__input newsletter__input--zip" type="text" required="" oninvalid="this.setCustomValidity('Please provide a valid postal code.')" placeholder="Your postal code" name="zipOrPostal">
  <button class="button-alt newsletter__button" value="Submit">Sign Up</button>
</form>

POST //links.iterable.com/lists/addSubscriberForm?emailListId=359019

<form action="//links.iterable.com/lists/addSubscriberForm?emailListId=359019" method="post" data-ga-label="modal">
  <input type="hidden" name="elqFormName" value="nps_email_signup">
  <input type="hidden" name="elqSiteID" value="2531">
  <input type="hidden" name="program_src" value="frontline_dispatch">
  <input type="hidden" name="News_Frontline_Dispatch" value="1">
  <input type="hidden" name="success_page" value="https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/newsletter-subscriptions/thanks/">
  <input class="newsletter__input newsletter__input--email" type="email" placeholder="Your email address" name="email">
  <input class="newsletter__input newsletter__input--zip" type="text" placeholder="Your zip code" name="zipOrPostal">
  <button class="button-alt newsletter__button" value="Submit">Sign Up</button>
</form>

POST //links.iterable.com/lists/addSubscriberForm?emailListId=865911

<form action="//links.iterable.com/lists/addSubscriberForm?emailListId=865911" method="post" data-ga-label="modal">
  <input type="hidden" name="elqFormName" value="nps_email_signup">
  <input type="hidden" name="elqSiteID" value="2531">
  <input type="hidden" name="program_src" value="frontline">
  <input type="hidden" name="News_Frontline_Beta" value="1">
  <input type="hidden" name="success_page" value="https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/newsletter-subscriptions/thanks/">
  <input class="newsletter__input newsletter__input--email" type="email" required="" oninvalid="this.setCustomValidity('Please provide a valid email address.')" placeholder="Your email address" name="email">
  <input class="newsletter__input newsletter__input--zip" type="text" required="" oninvalid="this.setCustomValidity('Please provide a valid postal code.')" placeholder="Your postal code" name="zipOrPostal">
  <button class="button-alt newsletter__button" value="Submit">Sign Up</button>
</form>

Text Content

 
PBS

 * Shows
 * Video
 * TV Schedules
 * Shop
 * Donate




FRONTLINE
Menu
 * Films
 * Podcasts
 * Topics
    * COVID-19
    * Election 2020
    * Local Journalism Initiative
    * World
    * U.S. Politics
    * Immigration
    * Criminal Justice
    * Social Issues
    * Business and Economy
    * Climate and Environment
    * War and Conflict
    * Terrorism
    * View All Topics

 * Schedule
 * Shop

 * Search
   
 * Shop

 * GET OUR NEWSLETTER
   
   Subscribe
   
   FOLLOW FRONTLINE
   
    * Twitter
    * Facebook
    * YouTube
    * Instagram


CADMIUM SPIKED INSIDE A TAMPA LEAD FACTORY. WORKERS DIDN’T GET HELP.

Share:
 * Twitter
 * Facebook
 * E-mail

Anil Eglais, 62, watched his health decline after working more than 25 years at
Gopher's Tampa lead factory, where he was exposed to poisonous metals including
cadmium. (Martha Ascencio Rhine | Tampa Bay Times)

In partnership with:

September 23, 2021
by
Rebecca Woolington
Corey G. Johnson
Eli Murray

In June 2014, an air monitor strapped to a worker inside a Tampa lead factory
picked up an unmistakable red flag.

The level of cadmium, a toxic metal known to cause cancer, had soared to more
than 100 times the federal limit.

It happened again the next winter, with the level reaching 75 times the limit.
Both times, the amount of cadmium in the air far exceeded the capability of most
workers’ protective equipment.

The high readings should have prompted Gopher Resource to meticulously track and
document the risk to employees. But records obtained by the Tampa Bay Times show
no evidence of any tests for cadmium in the year that followed.

It wasn’t the only time. The documents, which the company provided to employees,
show two other gaps in cadmium testing over the past decade, each lasting about
two years.

The federal government regulates worker exposure to cadmium, setting rules for
how much is allowed in the air, how data must be recorded and disclosed, and how
companies must evaluate the health of workers who are possibly exposed.

For years, Gopher broke those rules, putting dozens of workers at risk of
serious health consequences, the Times has found.

A Times investigation earlier this year chronicled Gopher’s persistent problems
with the neurotoxin lead and other poisonous chemicals. Cadmium has long been
present inside the factory. But in the rare instances when regulators showed up,
they focused mostly on lead or gases like sulfur dioxide.

This story demonstrates for the first time how the company and government
regulators mishandled another dangerous chemical inside Florida’s only lead
smelter.

Read more: POISONED: Part 1: The Factory

Reporters analyzed data measuring the factory’s air quality and reviewed medical
records for 26 employees who worked in various locations around the plant. The
records depict a company that left workers in the dark about cadmium exposure,
despite federal rules requiring they be given comprehensive data.

The documents and interviews also show that Gopher’s contracted doctor
repeatedly failed to follow up on lab tests designed to protect the health of
workers. It is the same doctor who the Times found had cleared employees to work
despite health problems that could be tied to lead.

Gopher executives did not agree to an interview for this story and did not
answer questions in writing. In a statement, Gopher said it believes the company
is in compliance with federal rules on cadmium exposure and that the Times’
reporting appeared to be based on incomplete records.

But Gopher told multiple employees in writing that the records reviewed by the
Times represented all of its testing for cadmium. And when asked by reporters to
provide additional information, Gopher declined.

Company officials said they were busy working with the Occupational Safety and
Health Administration on a review prompted by the Times’ earlier reporting.

“Gopher Resource is focused on cooperating with the ongoing OSHA investigation
and addressing their inspectors’ questions and requests as they continue that
effort,” the company said in a statement.

Cadmium is a naturally occurring metal that exists in zinc, copper and lead ore.
People are mainly exposed by smoking cigarettes or eating certain foods grown in
cadmium-contaminated soil.

At Gopher, cadmium can be found in scrap metal and in the lead that workers
extract from used batteries. The lead is liquefied in furnaces, purified in the
refinery and forged into new blocks, which are sold to companies. Cadmium
exposure occurs from inhaling metal fumes and dust.

Cadmium can build in the body over time, and even low levels are considered
dangerous. Chronic exposure can cause lung cancer and can damage the kidneys and
bones. It has been associated with increased risk of prostate cancer and heart
disease.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends that companies keep
air levels as low as possible and equip workers with the most protective
respirators around any detectable level of the metal.

OSHA has its own rules, which limit the amount of cadmium workers can have in
their blood and urine. The rules require companies to measure the amount of a
specific protein in workers’ urine to assess possible kidney damage. When
elevated levels are detected, the company physician must provide a written
medical opinion, “clearly and carefully” explain all results and follow up with
more testing and exams.

Gopher has a history of not providing that follow-up, the Times found.

Anil Eglais worked at the plant for more than 25 years, mostly in the furnace
and refining departments. He had poisonous metal in his blood for decades, his
medical records show. For two straight years, he had enough of the protein in
his urine to require additional medical care.

He didn’t get it — despite having other company lab results indicating problems
with his kidney function. The company-contracted physician, Dr. Bruce Bohnker,
didn’t mention signs of kidney damage in a letter to Eglais or in a separate
medical opinion.

The Times found at least four additional instances when the doctor didn’t
document other workers’ need for follow-up. The most recent example occurred in
2020.

Bohnker did not respond to emails or letters from the Times sent to his office
and home.

Reporters also asked Gopher in February about the lack of follow-up provided to
workers. The inquiries appeared to have prompted some change in practice. At
least two workers with elevated protein levels, including furnace veteran Cliff
Burnett, were called back to the office for further testing, they said.

Bohnker wrote Burnett a letter indicating that he would receive more frequent
medical care until his levels returned to normal. The doctor also referred
Burnett to a kidney specialist under workers’ compensation.

“I was shocked,” Burnett said. “Because, I’m thinking, he never did this
before.”

Cliff Burnett, 54, had signs of possible kidney damage that required follow-up
under OSHA’s cadmium rules. But Burnett said the company doctor never told him
or explained the requirement until after the Times started reporting on cadmium.
(Martha Ascencio Rhine | Tampa Bay Times)


‘ASTRONOMICAL’ LEVELS

Gopher’s problems with cadmium date back more than a decade, records show.

Federal rules require companies to test the air for cadmium every six months
when exposure reaches what’s called an action level.

The rules also set a worker exposure limit: 5 micrograms of cadmium per cubic
meter of air averaged over a shift.

A higher limit of 50 micrograms per cubic meter applies in two of the more
contaminated locations inside the factory: the furnace area and a place called
the baghouse, where toxic gases and dust get routed through the ventilation
system. Workers in both spots must wear respirators to lower their exposure.

Companies are required to keep accurate data on cadmium exposure levels and
maintain them for decades. Current and former employees can obtain the records
from areas where they worked. The Times’ analysis is based on records obtained
by employees and shared with reporters.

In September 2010, Gopher recorded an air-cadmium level of 272 micrograms per
cubic meter in the furnace department. The reading was several times above the
federal limit and beyond what the standard company-issued respirators were
equipped to handle.

At the time, Gopher was building a new plant with an intricate ventilation
system. Construction was completed in 2012. But almost immediately, mechanical
issues arose that increased dust levels inside the factory.

It is unclear how much cadmium was in the air. Data provided by Gopher to
workers and reviewed by the Times show no testing in factory work areas for all
of 2012 and 2013.

Problems continued. In the baghouse, equipment breakdowns left workers doing
dangerous manual labor that could increase their exposure. Workers described
regularly shoveling mounds of contaminated dust that looked like sand dunes.
Some spaces were so dusty, they looked like they’d been coated with a blanket of
snow.

In June 2014, records show, a baghouse worker was exposed to an air-cadmium
concentration of 7,206 micrograms per cubic meter — 144 times the federal limit
and 29 times what the standard respirator could handle.

More testing was done in March 2015. The concentration of cadmium in the air
reached 3,839 micrograms per cubic meter in the baghouse.

Mark Wilson, a toxicologist and director of the industrial hygiene program at
Tulane University, called the levels “astronomical.” He and two other industrial
hygiene experts said that cadmium levels shouldn’t exceed the federal limit of
50 micrograms per cubic meter.

In 2014 and 2015, 13 tests from the furnace had results that exceeded that
limit, including two that also went beyond what the standard respirator could
handle.

It is unclear if Gopher tested for cadmium in 2016 and the first five months of
2017. Records provided to workers do not contain any results for cadmium tests
during that period.

In June 2017, elevated air-cadmium levels in the furnace prompted Gopher’s
safety team to voluntarily review its procedures.

The internal review found that Gopher should examine its manual labor methods,
such as shoveling debris, because the practices contributed to higher exposure
and were discouraged in OSHA’s rules, a draft report shows. It also found Gopher
should update worker training to include topics covered by cadmium regulations,
such as the health effects of the metal and where and how prevalent it can be in
the workplace.

What’s more, the review determined the plant did not have signs to warn workers
about cadmium. Under OSHA’s rules, signs are supposed to be posted around
certain work areas and include the following language:

Danger
Cadmium
May cause cancer
Causes damage to lungs and kidneys

Wilson, the industrial hygienist, said communicating dangers to workers is a
critical part in keeping them safe.

“It’s just kind of a basic human right,” Wilson said.

The review further pointed out that Gopher needed to complete a written plan for
reducing worker exposure to cadmium. The draft report referenced a Nov. 30, 2014
compliance plan that mentioned the metal, but didn’t include any data about
exposure levels in the plant.

Gopher’s safety team concluded that the lack of data meant exposures likely were
below the federal level requiring semi-annual testing. But an exposure level had
actually reached more than 2,800 times that concentration earlier in 2014, an
air-monitoring report obtained by the Times shows.

Gopher decided it should fix the problems and measure the amount of cadmium in
the air on the same quarterly schedule it used for detecting lead.

But it is not clear how often the company tested — or what the results showed —
in the two years that followed. In 2018, a mistake at the lab rendered all of
that year’s cadmium air readings indiscernible, according to internal records.

After that, air-monitoring reports don’t show cadmium test results again until
the end of 2019.


‘A PROBLEM’

While cadmium levels spiked and Gopher identified problems with its own
procedures, the company and its contracted doctor failed to help some of the
most vulnerable workers.

OSHA requires annual tests to see whether workers have been exposed to cadmium.
That includes blood and urine screens, as well as the test for the protein
indicating kidney injury.

Cadmium isn’t the only reason someone might have a high level of the protein in
his or her urine. Kidney damage from other causes like lead exposure, diabetes
or blood cancers can also result in higher-than-normal levels. But company
doctors are required to investigate, determine the likely cause and decide
whether to reassign the worker to a position where he or she will not be exposed
to cadmium.

Listen: Poisoned: Tampa’s Lead Problem

When a worker’s levels are elevated, OSHA’s rules require the company to provide
additional lab tests and a medical exam within 90 days. If the worker isn’t
reassigned, lab testing is required at least twice a year until the levels
return to normal.

The rules apply to all workers, including those who inhale cadmium through
cigarette smoking.

Sixteen of the 26 employees whose records were reviewed by the Times had cadmium
in their blood or urine at least once during their time in the plant. Nine of
those workers identified as current or former smokers.

None of the workers had levels high enough to require being removed from the
factory under OSHA’s rules. But industrial hygiene and medical experts
interviewed by the Times said no level is considered safe.

Nine workers had signs of elevated protein in their urine. Seven had other lab
results indicating possible kidney damage.

At least six, including Burnett, required follow-up under OSHA’s rules. But
Bohnker, the company’s contracted physician, did not note the requirement in
medical opinions or letters to those workers before the Times started reporting
on cadmium, records show.

Read more: POISONED: Part 2: The Failings

Burnett’s test came back elevated in January 2020, according to his medical
records. Parts of Bohnker’s letter to Burnett were not easy to interpret or
understand. The doctor used medical jargon, included unexplained test results
and omitted the elevated protein level.

“You don’t know what the hell that means,” said Burnett, who left Gopher in
August. “You just see numbers.”

If something is wrong, he added, “you trust that they’re going to help you.”

Instead, Burnett was allowed to keep working without documented warning from the
doctor.

Bohnker and Gopher missed other opportunities to alert workers.

When Bohnker started contracting with Gopher in 2013, his medical opinions
directly addressed whether a worker could be sick from cadmium — or too at risk
to be around the metal. But by fall 2014, after cadmium exposure inside the
plant had reached its highest levels, medical opinions filled out by Bohnker and
reviewed by the Times failed to mention cadmium at all.

In addition, lab reports provided to workers from late 2014 through 2016 did not
flag results indicating that the level of protein in their urine was above
OSHA’s threshold.

Eglais, the longtime furnace and refining worker, regularly had measurable
levels of cadmium in his blood or urine, a review of his medical records shows.
He smoked cigarettes, but it is unclear how much of his exposure came from
tobacco and how much was from work.

Eglais was born in Haiti and grew up speaking Haitian Creole. He moved to
Florida and started at the plant in the late ‘80s.

At Gopher, he drove a forklift in the furnace, unloaded used car batteries from
trucks and worked to purify lead inside the refinery’s kettles. He described
“plenty of dust all over the place” inside the plant. But on questionnaires for
company medical exams asking about his exposure amount and duration, he left the
answers blank or simply wrote he didn’t know.

Over his career, the amount of lead detected in his blood averaged more than six
times what the Centers for Disease Control now considers elevated, putting him
at risk of high blood pressure, cardiovascular disease and kidney damage.

Based on OSHA’s standards, Eglais had elevated levels of cadmium in his urine as
early as 1998, when the plant had different owners. Over the next 10 years, the
metal was detected in his urine two more times.

By 2015, Eglais had enough protein in his urine to require additional testing
and another exam. His lab results also showed he was anemic and had other signs
of kidney injury. But the letter he received from Bohnker after his checkup that
year did not mention any need for follow-up.

The next year, Eglais had even more protein in his urine and continued signs of
kidney dysfunction. His anemia worsened.

Again, Eglais went in for a checkup. In a letter to Eglais, Bohnker acknowledged
that the anemia merited attention and suggested Eglais follow up with a primary
care doctor. But he gave no assessment of Eglais’ kidney function or protein
level. He wrote nothing about follow-up required by OSHA’s rules.

Instead, he noted, “I find no areas of concern from this physical examination
related to occupational exposures with Gopher.”

Anil Eglais, who spent more than two decades at the Tampa factory, worried about
his declining health after experiencing heart problems in 2016. He died in an
automobile crash in July. (Martha Ascencio Rhine | Tampa Bay Times)

Eglais himself, however, had serious concerns. He’d watched long-term colleagues
and friends become ill and wondered when it would be his turn.

“All of us working at that place,” said Eglais, “you working there long, you
ain’t gonna live long.”

A month after his 2016 exam, Eglais, then 58, collapsed inside his home from an
infection-related heart failure. At the hospital, tests suggested he might have
blood cancer. Doctors recommended he receive further testing from specialists
after his discharge.

Dr. Steven Markowitz, an occupational physician and professor at Queens College,
City University of New York, said Bohnker couldn’t have prevented Eglais from
developing his illnesses. But had the doctor more thoroughly reported the
abnormal findings to Eglais, Markowitz said, his prognosis might have been
better.

Bohnker, Markowitz said, should have explained in his written assessment that
Eglais’ lab results indicated kidney damage.

The doctor also should have acknowledged in writing that work exposure could
contribute to Eglais’ problems or make them worse, Markowitz said. And he should
have ordered follow-up tests as required by OSHA’s cadmium rules, which
Markowitz likened to a cookbook recipe because the mandatory steps are so clear.

“This is a problem,” Markowitz said.

Eglais left Gopher in July 2017. That same month, the company finished its
cadmium review, finding itself “substantially” in compliance with the medical
requirements outlined in OSHA’s rules.

In an email to the company describing some needed tweaks to worker exams,
Bohnker wrote he believed they were “basically okay.”

Eglais, meanwhile, watched his health decline. In 2020, he was diagnosed with
severe kidney disease and an aggressive form of blood cancer called multiple
myeloma.

Not long after, Eglais began talking to the Times. He said his health problems
snuck up on him. He felt good until he didn’t, his body plagued by hidden
changes. In recent months, a sense of impending death haunted him. He choked up
talking about his outlook.

Times reporters planned to do a final interview with Eglais in July. But he lost
control of his pickup truck the night Tropical Storm Elsa rolled into Tampa. He
died after crashing into oncoming traffic.

He was 62.


WARNING SIGNS MISSED

When Gopher broke the rules on cadmium, it did so without consequence or notice
from federal regulators.

Occasionally, OSHA inspectors visited the plant to assess workers’ exposure to
lead and other toxic chemicals. But inspectors missed that the company
repeatedly far surpassed the limits for cadmium in the air.

In December 2014, six months after cadmium was measured more than 100 times over
the federal limit in one part of the factory, an OSHA inspector responded to a
referral about lead exposure at Gopher. The inspector fastened monitors to
workers’ uniforms to measure the amount of metals in the plant’s air, including
cadmium.

A test in the furnace area recorded a cadmium level slightly above the federal
limit. But the inspector wrongly referred to the metal in her report as zinc
oxide.

The inspector’s report doesn’t say if she examined the company’s own
air-monitoring data for cadmium levels or whether workers were equipped with
proper respirators.

OSHA said the agency must have probable cause to broaden an inspection and
examine conditions beyond those outlined in an original complaint. OSHA said the
2014 inspection did not include a record of the high air-cadmium level measured
months before.

But the level of cadmium the inspector measured in the air alone should have
warranted that Gopher regularly conduct air monitoring and place signs around
the plant warning workers of exposure to the carcinogen. Her report doesn’t say
whether the plant had the danger signs posted.

OSHA didn’t answer questions about why the inspector’s findings didn’t prompt a
more thorough review.

“It is the agency’s policy not to discuss determinations beyond what is included
in the case file,” OSHA said.

Inspectors who visited the plant in 2015 and 2016 didn’t address cadmium
exposure or the contracted physician’s shortcomings in their reports, either.

The Times, in its initial investigation, reported that federal regulators had
missed opportunities to hold the company accountable for breaking rules related
to other toxic chemicals, including lead.

In April, OSHA began inspecting the plant for the first time in five years. The
inquiry is ongoing.

Regulators have taken air samples and wiped surfaces to test for contaminated
dust. They’ve interviewed workers and requested a year’s worth of medical
records to examine.

This time, OSHA said, it will evaluate Gopher’s compliance with the cadmium
rules.

This story is part of a collaboration with the Tampa Bay Times through
FRONTLINE’s Local Journalism Initiative, which is funded by the John S. and
James L. Knight Foundation and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

REBECCA WOOLINGTON, INVESTIGATIVE REPORTER, TAMPA BAY TIMES, TAMPA BAY TIMES

EMAIL:

rwoolington@tampabay.com

TWITTER:

@rwoolington

COREY G. JOHNSON, INVESTIGATIVE REPORTER, TAMPA BAY TIMES, TAMPA BAY TIMES

EMAIL:

cjohnson@tampabay.com

TWITTER:

@coreygjohnson

ELI MURRAY, DATA REPORTER, TAMPA BAY TIMES, TAMPA BAY TIMES

EMAIL:

emurray@tampabay.com

TWITTER:

@Eli_Mur

Journalistic Standards


LISTEN TO THE PODCAST

POISONED: TAMPA'S LEAD PROBLEM

Support Provided By Learn more



SEE WHAT FRONTLINE IS WORKING ON NOW

Get Our Newsletter


OTHER ARTICLES FROM LOCAL JOURNALISM INITIATIVE

 * REGULATORS TO STEP UP MONITORING OF TAMPA LEAD FACTORY
   
   December 11, 2021

 * THE ‘21-FOOT RULE’: HOW A CONTROVERSIAL TRAINING FOR POLICE IS USED TO
   JUSTIFY SHOOTINGS
   
   December 6, 2021

 * POISONED: PART 3: THE FALLOUT
   
   December 2, 2021


TOPICS

 * Local Journalism Initiative,
 * Poisoned


Show Comments

In order to foster a civil and literate discussion that respects all
participants, FRONTLINE has the following guidelines for commentary. By
submitting comments here, you are consenting to these rules:

Readers' comments that include profanity, obscenity, personal attacks,
harassment, or are defamatory, sexist, racist, violate a third party's right to
privacy, or are otherwise inappropriate, will be removed. Entries that are
unsigned or are "signed" by someone other than the actual author will be
removed. We reserve the right to not post comments that are more than 400 words.
We will take steps to block users who repeatedly violate our commenting rules,
terms of use, or privacy policies. You are fully responsible for your comments.


Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.


MORE STORIES

THE FED IS ENDING PANDEMIC STIMULUS SOONER THAN PLANNED. WHAT COULD IT MEAN FOR
INFLATION?

With consumer prices at their highest since 1982, Fed Chair Jerome Powell
announced Dec. 15 the Fed would end its pandemic stimulus — examined in the July
2021 doc 'The Power of the Fed' — and would take action on inflation, although
he did not specify when interest-rate hikes would come.
December 16, 2021

SENATE WHISTLEBLOWER REPORT: AFTER BOEING 737 MAX CRASHES, PROBLEMS WITH FAA
OVERSIGHT CONTINUE

A whistleblower who is cited in the newly released Senate report, Joe Jacobsen,
had also spoken out in the documentary ‘Boeing’s Fatal Flaw.’
December 14, 2021

POST-PANDORA PAPERS, A BIG WEEK OF FEDERAL ACTIVITY EXAMINES HIDDEN WEALTH

Hidden wealth — as examined in the recent documentary 'Pandora Papers' — is
under the federal microscope, with a House hearing, a draft rule and a new Biden
administration plan all in one week. What could it mean for an industry that has
brought millions in controversial assets to South Dakota and other U.S. states?
December 14, 2021

REGULATORS TO STEP UP MONITORING OF TAMPA LEAD FACTORY

A county in Florida plans to increase testing around Gopher Resource’s lead
factory and use a new, randomized schedule following a Tampa Bay Times report.
December 11, 2021
Show more


NEXT ON FRONTLINE


OPIOIDS, INC.

December 28, 2021 // 53m
The story of a drug company that pushed opioids by bribing doctors and
committing insurance fraud.
×Close


GET OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe

FOLLOW FRONTLINE

 * Twitter
 * Facebook
 * YouTube
 * Instagram

Home Films Podcasts Investigations Schedule Contact Us Our Funders Privacy
Policy PBS Privacy Policy PBS Terms of Use Corporate Sponsorship
About
About Us History Awards Editorial Standards and Ethics Journalistic Guidelines
Our Team
Senior Editorial Team Our Staff

Jobs/Internships Pressroom
Teacher Center
PBS LearningMedia FRONTLINE Teacher Center

Jon and Jo Ann Hagler on behalf of the Jon L. Hagler Foundation

Koo and Patricia Yuen

 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 

Funding for FRONTLINE is provided through the support of PBS viewers and by the
Corporation for Public Broadcasting. Major funding for FRONTLINE is provided by
the Ford Foundation. Additional funding is provided by the Abrams Foundation;
the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation; Park Foundation; and the
FRONTLINE Journalism Fund with major support from Jon and Jo Ann Hagler on
behalf of the Jon L. Hagler Foundation, and additional support from Koo and
Patricia Yuen.
FRONTLINE is a registered trademark of WGBH Educational Foundation. Web Site
Copyright ©1995-2021 WGBH Educational Foundation. PBS is a 501(c)(3)
not-for-profit organization.
×Close


FRONTLINE NEWSLETTER


WE ANSWER TO NO ONE BUT YOU

Sign Up

You'll receive access to exclusive information and early alerts about our
documentaries and investigations.

I'm already subscribed

×Close


THE FRONTLINE DISPATCH


DON'T MISS AN EPISODE. SIGN-UP FOR THE FRONTLINE DISPATCH NEWSLETTER.

Sign Up

I'm already subscribed

×Close


UNRESOLVED


SIGN-UP FOR THE UNRESOLVED NEWSLETTER.

Sign Up

I'm already subscribed