slate.com Open in urlscan Pro
151.101.130.133  Public Scan

Submitted URL: https://apple.news/Axmg8K6hQQ3q9o8e5geHfOQ?articleList=AjwBiSxZQRfGLWAgTyzxQWA
Effective URL: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2022/02/ukraine-invasion-putin-is-ruling-alone.html
Submission: On March 07 via api from US — Scanned from DE

Form analysis 2 forms found in the DOM

/search

<form action="/search" class="search-form" data-via="search">
  <input id="search-input" name="q" placeholder="Search for" class="search-form__input">
  <button class="search-form__submit">
    <svg class="search-form__icon">
      <title>Submit search</title>
      <use xlink:href="/media/components/masthead/sprite.svg#search"></use>
    </svg>
  </button>
  <label for="search-input" class="search-form__label">
    <svg class="search-form__icon">
      <title>Enter query</title>
      <use xlink:href="/media/components/masthead/sprite.svg#search"></use>
    </svg>
  </label>
</form>

<form class="newsletter-signup__form js-signup-form" novalidate="">
  <div class="newsletter-signup__error js-submit-error" hidden=""> We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again. </div>
  <noscript>
    <div class="newsletter-signup__error"> Please enable javascript to use form. </div>
  </noscript>
  <div class="newsletter-signup__form-set">
    <label class="newsletter-signup__group">
      <div id="newsletter-label" class="newsletter-signup__label js-validation-error"> Email address: </div>
      <input class="newsletter-signup__input js-email" type="email" autocomplete="email" aria-invalid="false" required="">
    </label>
    <div class="newsletter-signup__additional">
      <label class="newsletter-signup__check-group">
        <input class="newsletter-signup__checkbox js-marketing" type="checkbox">
        <div class="newsletter-signup__check-label">Send me updates about Slate special offers.</div>
      </label>
      <span class="newsletter-signup__terms"> By signing up, you agree to our <a href="/privacy" class="newsletter-signup__terms-link">Privacy Policy</a> and <a href="/terms" class="newsletter-signup__terms-link">Terms</a>. </span>
    </div>
    <button class="newsletter-signup__submit js-signup-button slate-button">Sign Up</button>
  </div>
</form>

Text Content

Skip to the content


NOTABLE TOPICS

 * Vikings: Valhalla
 * Truth Social
 * Anti-Vaxxers
 * The Batman
 * Mitt Romney
 * Stem Player
 * Masking
 * Second Sight

 * 
 * Sign In
 * Account Activating this button will toggle the display of additional content
   Account Sign out

Slate homepage
Submit search Enter query
 * News & Politics
 * Culture
 * Technology
 * Business
 * Human Interest
 * Podcasts

Menu Open menu
Close menu


NOTABLE TOPICS

Vikings: Valhalla Truth Social Anti-Vaxxers The Batman Mitt Romney Stem Player
Masking Second Sight
News & Politics Culture Technology Business Human Interest Podcasts Search

Follow us Slate on Instagram Slate on Twitter Slate on Facebook
Subscribe
Sign in Account Sign out
Slate homepage
Account

* The Once-Hot MP3 Market
Follow Us Slate on Instagram Slate on Twitter Slate on Facebook
Advertisement

Advertisement


Politics


THE TERRIBLE TRUTH SO MANY EXPERTS MISSED ABOUT RUSSIA


VLADIMIR PUTIN DIDN’T ALWAYS RULE HIS COUNTRY ALONE. NOW HE DOES, AND THE
DICTATOR APPEARS TO CARE LITTLE ABOUT THE CONSEQUENCES OF HIS ACTIONS.

By Ben Judah
Feb 28, 202211:28 AM

Vladimir Putin in Moscow on Sunday. Russian Pool/Reuters TV via Reuters
Tweet Share Comment
Tweet Share Comment

The belief that Vladimir Putin was bluffing, that he would never give the order
for the nearly 200,000-man army he had spent months amassing on the borders of
Ukraine to invade, persisted as late as 5:45 a.m. Moscow time the day of the
attack, when, grimacing in a red tie, Russia’s ruler of almost 23 years
announced in a prerecorded statement what he called “a special military
operation.”

This was not just a shock on American political Twitter. It was a shock to many
of the leading experts and policymakers in the United States, Europe, and even
Ukraine. The head of German intelligence was so caught off guard that he was
still in Kyiv and had to be evacuated.

Advertisement


But nowhere did the shock feel more profound than among foreign policy analysts
in Russia, where overwhelming consensus, until that very moment, had been that
Putin would never launch such a war.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement



SUBSCRIBE TO THE SLATEST NEWSLETTER

A daily email update of the stories you need to read right now.

We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again.
Please enable javascript to use form.
Email address:
Send me updates about Slate special offers.
By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms.
Sign Up

Thanks for signing up! You can manage your newsletter subscriptions at any time.

Even someone as experienced as Sir John Sawers, former head of the British
intelligence agency MI6—the role code-named M in the James Bond universe—told me
just a week before the invasion began: “The idea that Putin was actually going
to invade the whole of Ukraine, topple the Kyiv government, and occupy the whole
country, for years to come—I never thought that that was a realistic prospect.”*

Among even the leaders who had spent weeks warning a major offensive was
imminent, a tone of surprise was not too hard to detect in their statements. “I
cannot believe this is being done in your name,” said British Prime Minister
Boris Johnson, trying to address, for a moment, the Russian people, “or that you
really want the pariah status it will bring to the Putin regime.”

Advertisement

Advertisement


However, that phrase—“the Putin regime”—which has been stuck to all discussions
of Russian politics now for almost 20 years, in some ways itself helps explain
why so many people who believed they understood the country turned out to be so
wrong about the Ukraine conflict. It has become clear that what exists inside
the Kremlin is no longer a “regime” at all—a system of government where multiple
figures can affect and feed into decision-making, from security chiefs to
billionaires—as many believed.

Advertisement


Instead, it has transformed into what political scientists call a personalist
dictatorship, where the whims of one man, and one man only, determine policy, a
fact that has terrifying implications for Russia and the world.

Advertisement


Americans tend to see the world in much the same way as President Joe Biden
frames it in his speeches, divided neatly between “democracies” and
“autocracies.” But the reality is that authoritarian states exist on a political
spectrum depending on how much power is exercised by a single individual—and
where states land on this spectrum has a big impact on matters of war and peace.
At one end, you have civilian-run regimes, like Hu Jintao’s China or Leonid
Brezhnev’s Soviet Union, where political power is checked and shared within a
ruling party. At the other, you have personalist dictatorships like that of,
say, Saddam Hussein, where rivals are purged, loyalists are rewarded, cults of
personality flourish, and all authority runs through the glorious leader.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement


The political science literature suggests that personalist dictatorships are
more erratic and dangerous to the outside world than other sorts of autocracies.

Researchers have found they are more likely to start wars, for instance
(institutionalized civilian-run regimes are about as apt to use force as
democracies), and also tend to perform worse militarily (not surprising, since
their leaders are often surrounded by yes men). But while civilian-run regimes
might be less apt to launch destructive, harebrained conflicts in the short
term, in the long term they can still be ticking time bombs.

Advertisement

Advertisement


That’s because as they age, their intricate power structures often devolve and
allow dictators to consolidate personal control. In a forthcoming paper, Andrew
Leber and Matthew Reichert of Harvard University and Christopher Carothers of
the University of Pennsylvania theorize that this tends to happen when there’s
no influential old guard of political elites who can stop them. All of which
pretty much sums up what has happened in Russia over the last two decades.

Advertisement


While the world’s news readers may long have thought of Vladimir Putin as a
dictator, most Russia analysts and policymakers saw the Kremlin differently. And
for most of Putin’s nearly 23-year journey in power, they were right to do so.
What existed was a complicated regime beyond one man where lots of people
exerted influence and could check Putin’s impulses.

Putin began his rule as Boris Yeltsin’s chosen successor in 1999. Then, he was a
kind of semi-democratic populist strongman—closer to Turkey’s Recep Tayyip
Erdogan than the Putin of today. He turned toward full-on authoritarianism with
the rigged 2004 Russian elections. But his government still looked to the U.S.
Embassy like a regime in which billionaires and security chiefs influenced grand
strategy when he installed Dmitry Medvedev as puppet president from 2008 to 2012
and toyed with retirement.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement


Mass protests against the government may have changed Putin’s thinking, and he
began to tighten his grip on power after returning to the presidency in 2012. As
Leber and his co-authors note, by then, nobody in Russia was in a position to
challenge him. But, even as late as 2014, when Putin decided to annex Crimea,
the move was taken after a night of intense discussion with his inner circle in
the Kremlin—after commissioning secret polls on public opinion. There was still
some semblance of a regime, albeit one in which Putin tightly controlled its
reins.

This brings us to today. A key reason that many wise foreign policy hands
thought Russia was bluffing about an invasion was that they assumed Putin wasn’t
making his decisions alone. This assumption informed much of Western strategy.
Experts believed that threatening Russian oligarchs with sanctions, for
instance, would encourage Putin’s inner circle to push back against war.
Offering accommodation—for example, changes to the Ukrainian Constitution,
autonomy for the Donbas region under the Minsk Agreement, or a 20-year
moratorium on NATO expansion—would satisfy the regime’s rational actors, the
thinking went, even if Putin himself had grander visions of territorial
conquest. Threats of economic sanctions were supposed to raise the oligarchs’
concerns about public backlash. The prospect of high casualties, of what was
already certain to be a very unpopular war, convinced many that a regime
concerned somewhat with public opinion would undertake it.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

The world is now realizing that the Putin regime is really just Vladimir Putin.

But the world is now realizing that the Putin regime is really just Vladimir
Putin. And he is apparently no longer worried about what war will mean for
Russia’s rich, much less its masses.

This was made brutally clear to all in the astonishing session of the Russian
security council a week ago. In the echoing and ornate hall of St. Catherine in
the Kremlin, a former imperial throne room where the annexation of Crimea was
announced in 2014, Putin gathered his most senior lieutenants to “consult them”
on whether to recognize the independence of the so-called Luhansk and Donetsk
People’s Republics.

Advertisement

Advertisement


Not only did many of them look visibly uncomfortable, but the head of Russian
foreign intelligence, Sergey Naryshkin, looked actually scared—to the point
where he forgot whether he was being asked whether or not to welcome the
republics into Russia itself or merely if they should be recognized as
independent.

Advertisement


The same shift was more subtly visible in St. Catherine’s Hall after the
fighting began.

Putin summoned the country’s leading businessmen to what the Western press
described as an “oligarchs meeting.” However, as astutely noted by the Financial
Times’ Moscow bureau chief, Max Seddon, few of those present were what we
actually think of as oligarchs: billionaires of independent wealth, power, and
influence, the type who dominated Russia back in the 1990s.

Advertisement


Instead, those at the “oligarchs meeting” were by and large state company
directors with an intelligence background or Putin cronies elevated to great
wealth—men who owe their positions to Putin, not the other way around; men who
act as placeholders and frontmen for him in the commanding heights of the
economy. The best way to understand their political position is through a joke
common in Moscow: “They are not oligarchs; they just work as oligarchs.”

Advertisement


At this point, analysis of what Russia might do next largely consists of
guessing the state of Putin’s mind. (As the New York Times’ Tom Friedman put it,
“The only place to be for understanding this war is inside Russian President
Vladimir Putin’s head.”)

The press is chock-full of speculation about his sanity; now that he’s ordered
Russia’s nuclear forces on high alert, we’ve all been forced to contemplate the
possibility that this conflict could somehow spiral into atomic death and
destruction. Certainly, it’s unclear who could stop Putin from irrational
action.

Advertisement


But how did so many miss that Putin and his rule had changed? Part of the answer
is that Putin has been in power so long that much analysis simply got frozen in
the past. Impressions about a Russia dominated by “oligarchs” froze into legend
and did not keep up with their effective liquidation as a class. (It didn’t help
that Westerns know plenty of Russian billionaires from the Davos circuit, but
don’t know the security officials who’ve increasingly embraced the sort of
religious nationalism that seems to have gripped Putin.)

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement


The pandemic also made it difficult for outsiders to notice Putin’s apparent
descent into paranoid isolation; he has apparently cloistered himself for the
past few years through ultra-strict personal lockdowns and social distancing
measures that may have affected his judgment. The absurdly long tables Putin has
sat at for meetings have become a symbol of his remoteness (and a pretty good
meme). French President Emmanuel Macron reportedly found him a completely
“different person” in early February from the man he last met in 2019.

And finally, Western Russia analysis failed because it depends on Russian
analysis of its own society, and that failed even more catastrophically. There,
an expert class inured by decades of propaganda underestimated the effect that
the systematic dismantling of Russian journalism has had on its ability to know
what goes on inside the Kremlin. This, mixed with denial: It was simply too
terrifying to contemplate the fact Russians were living under dictatorship where
all the guardrails had fallen off. Though Americans may think of Russia as a
society used to tyrants, this is subtly missing the point. The post-Stalin
Soviet Union was a collectively ruled, civilian-led authoritarian regime, not
one-man rule. Stalin died when Putin was less than 5 months old, meaning the
ability to spot the warning signs of personalist dictatorship are almost as
distant to Russians as Hitler is to the Germans.

Advertisement

Advertisement



POPULAR IN NEWS & POLITICS

 1. This Beloved Confederate General Was One of the Worst Military Leaders in
    History
 2. Pretty Much No One Is Using Trump’s New Social Media App (Not Even Trump)
 3. Ukraine Asked Lawmakers Not to Share Photos of Zelensky During Call. Two GOP
    Senators Did it Anyway.
 4. The Most Uncanny Part of Watching the War in Ukraine

What can we expect next in this new phase of Putinism? Unfortunately, the
political science literature makes grim reading for Russians. As studies would
predict, the invasion of Ukraine is going quite poorly. But only 12.5 percent of
personalist leaders lost power within two years after losing a war, according to
a 2009 data set. Research by Desha Girod, Megan Stewart, and Meir Walters at
Georgetown suggests that oil-rich autocrats are better positioned to repress
dissent at home while resisting international pressure. Research also
comprehensively shows that leaders like Putin tend to be removed only by death
or a coup. The more intense the personalization of a government, the harder it
is to execute a coup—but it is harder still to imagine a peaceful transition of
power in Russia.



There is a ray of hope, however. Of the world’s wealthier authoritarian states,
Russia is arguably the only one to briefly have had something of a democracy and
a free society in its modern history (the debate depends on whether you still
count Turkey as a democracy). All the others—the Gulf petro-monarchies, China,
Singapore, Kazakhstan—have never experienced a break in authoritarian rule. That
may make some of Russia’s elites and regular citizens more likely to push back
rather than accept a deeper descent into autocracy. Putin’s war is already
imposing a new repressive order on society while sanctions are isolating it from
the world economy. In both cases, this means taking Russians backward, toward
something more like the USSR than the last few years—a considerably more
difficult task than other personalist dictators have attempted. Much as the
invasion of Ukraine is proving harder than Putin seems to have expected, so too
might pulling off that degree of oppression.

Correction, Feb. 28, 2022: This piece originally misidentified the code name of
the head of MI6 in James Bond as C. It is M.


Tweet Share Comment
Russia Vladimir Putin Ukraine
Advertisement


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------






YOU MAY LIKE
Hausfrage.de

Teilverkauf: Wenn das Geld trotz Rente knapp istHausfrage.de|
SponsoredSponsored


Undo
Forge Of Empires - Free Online Game

Wenn du Zeit am Computer totschlagen musst, ist dieses Vintage Spiel ein Muss.
Kein Install.Forge Of Empires - Free Online Game|
SponsoredSponsored


Undo
eToro

Fünf Krypto-Trends, die 2022 explodieren werdeneToro|
SponsoredSponsored
Hier klicken


Undo


MORE FROM SLATE
Ukraine Asked Lawmakers Not to Share Photos of Zelensky During Call. Two GOP
Senators Did it Anyway. Daniel PolitiDaniel PolitiUser: Daniel Politi
Pixar’s Groundbreaking New Movie Is One of Its Best in Years Dana StevensDana
StevensUser: Dana Stevens
Success Could Be Very Costly for Putin SLATE STAFFSLATE STAFFUser:
Putin’s Plan SLATE STAFFSLATE STAFFUser:
Pretty Much No One Is Using Trump’s New Social Media App (Not Even Trump) Daniel
PolitiDaniel PolitiUser: Daniel Politi
There Was Only One Clear Genius in Kanye West and Julia Fox’s Relationship
Heather SchwedelHeather SchwedelUser: Heather Schwedel


Artikel: Der Dieselskandal

Artikel: Der Dieselskandal|
SponsoredSponsored
EU bestätigt: Alle betroffenen Diesel mit Baujahr nach 2014 bekommen


Undo
slow-watches.com

slow-watches.com|
SponsoredSponsored
Handgefertigt in der Schweiz: 24 Std und nur 1 Zeiger. Die Slow Uhr hilft dir,
im Moment zu leben.


Undo
FAIRE PROVISION

FAIRE PROVISION|
SponsoredSponsored
Eigentümer aufgepasst: Kostenlose Immobilienbewertung vom Experten


Undo

Elvenar - Free Online Game

Elvenar - Free Online Game |
SponsoredSponsored
Age of Empires Spieler lieben dieses Spiel. Keine Werbung. Kein Install.


Undo
Verbraucher Helden

Verbraucher Helden|
SponsoredSponsored
Vor 1984 geboren? Dieser Trick macht die Beerdigung kostenlos


Undo









Advertisement


ABOUT

 * About Us
 * Work With Us
 * Contact
 * Pitch Guidelines
 * Send Us Tips
 * Corrections
 * Commenting
 * Reprints

SUBSCRIPTIONS

 * Subscribe
 * Sign In
 * Account
 * Subscription FAQs
 * Podcast FAQs
 * Newsletters
 * Customer Support

ADVERTISING

 * Site Advertising
 * Podcast Advertising
 * AdChoices
 * Cookie Preferences

The Slate Group logo

Slate is published by The Slate Group, a Graham Holdings Company.

FOLLOW US

Facebook Twitter Instagram RSS Feed
 * User Agreement
 * Privacy Policy

All contents © 2022 The Slate Group LLC. All rights reserved.





ABOUT YOUR PRIVACY

We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the
delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our
website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent.
You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at
a partner level in the link under each purpose. These choices will be signaled
to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
More information
Allow All


MANAGE CONSENT PREFERENCES

STRICTLY NECESSARY COOKIES

Always Active

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched
off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you
which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy
preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block
or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Cookies Details‎

PERFORMANCE COOKIES

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and
improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the
most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All
information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you
do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and
will not be able to monitor its performance.

Cookies Details‎

FUNCTIONAL COOKIES

Functional Cookies

These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and
personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose
services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then some
or all of these services may not function properly.

Cookies Details‎

TARGETING COOKIES

Targeting Cookies

These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may
be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you
relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal
information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet
device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted
advertising.

Cookies Details‎

PRECISE GEOLOCATION DATA, AND IDENTIFICATION THROUGH DEVICE SCANNING

Precise geolocation data, and identification through device scanning

 * USE PRECISE GEOLOCATION DATA
   
   Switch Label
   
   Your precise geolocation data can be used in support of one or more purposes.
   This means your location can be accurate to within several meters.

 * ACTIVELY SCAN DEVICE CHARACTERISTICS FOR IDENTIFICATION
   
   Switch Label
   
   Your device can be identified based on a scan of your device's unique
   combination of characteristics.

List of IAB Vendors‎ | View Full Legal Text Opens in a new Tab

PERSONALISED ADS AND CONTENT, AD AND CONTENT MEASUREMENT, AUDIENCE INSIGHTS AND
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT

Personalised ads and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and
product development

 * CREATE A PERSONALISED CONTENT PROFILE
   
   Switch Label
   
   A profile can be built about you and your interests to show you personalised
   content that is relevant to you.

 * SELECT PERSONALISED CONTENT
   
   Switch Label
   
   Personalised content can be shown to you based on a profile about you.

 * MEASURE CONTENT PERFORMANCE
   
   Switch Label
   
   The performance and effectiveness of content that you see or interact with
   can be measured.

List of IAB Vendors‎ | View Full Legal Text Opens in a new Tab

ENSURE SECURITY, PREVENT FRAUD, AND DEBUG

Always Active

Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent fraudulent activity, and ensure
systems and processes work properly and securely.

List of IAB Vendors‎ | View Full Legal Text Opens in a new Tab

TECHNICALLY DELIVER ADS OR CONTENT

Always Active

Your device can receive and send information that allows you to see and interact
with ads and content.

List of IAB Vendors‎ | View Full Legal Text Opens in a new Tab

MATCH AND COMBINE OFFLINE DATA SOURCES

Always Active

Data from offline data sources can be combined with your online activity in
support of one or more purposes

List of IAB Vendors‎ | View Full Legal Text Opens in a new Tab

LINK DIFFERENT DEVICES

Always Active

Different devices can be determined as belonging to you or your household in
support of one or more of purposes.

List of IAB Vendors‎ | View Full Legal Text Opens in a new Tab

RECEIVE AND USE AUTOMATICALLY-SENT DEVICE CHARACTERISTICS FOR IDENTIFICATION

Always Active

Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it
automatically sends, such as IP address or browser type.

List of IAB Vendors‎ | View Full Legal Text Opens in a new Tab

GOOGLE & IAB TCF 2 PURPOSES OF PROCESSING

Google & IAB TCF 2 Purposes of Processing

Allowing third-party ad tracking and third-party ad serving through Google and
other vendors to occur.Please see more information on Google Ads here.

 * STORE AND/OR ACCESS INFORMATION ON A DEVICE
   
   Switch Label
   
   Cookies, device identifiers, or other information can be stored or accessed
   on your device for the purposes presented to you.

 * CREATE A PERSONALISED ADS PROFILE
   
   Switch Label
   
   A profile can be built about you and your interests to show you personalised
   ads that are relevant to you.

 * SELECT BASIC ADS
   
   Switch Label
   
   Ads can be shown to you based on the content you’re viewing, the app you’re
   using, your approximate location, or your device type.

 * SELECT PERSONALISED ADS
   
   Switch Label
   
   Personalised ads can be shown to you based on a profile about you.

 * MEASURE AD PERFORMANCE
   
   Switch Label
   
   The performance and effectiveness of ads that you see or interact with can be
   measured.

 * APPLY MARKET RESEARCH TO GENERATE AUDIENCE INSIGHTS
   
   Switch Label
   
   Market research can be used to learn more about the audiences who visit
   sites/apps and view ads.

 * DEVELOP AND IMPROVE PRODUCTS
   
   Switch Label
   
   Your data can be used to improve existing systems and software, and to
   develop new products

List of IAB Vendors‎ | View Full Legal Text Opens in a new Tab
Cookies Details‎
Back Button


PERFORMANCE COOKIES



Search Icon
Filter Icon

Clear
checkbox label label
Apply Cancel
Consent Leg.Interest
checkbox label label
checkbox label label
checkbox label label

 * 
   
   View Cookies
   
    * Name
      cookie name

Confirm My Choices



WE USE COOKIES AND RELATED TECHNOLOGY

We and our partners store and/or access information on a device, such as unique
IDs in cookies to process personal data. You may accept or manage your choices
by clicking below or at any time in the privacy policy page. These choices will
be signaled to our partners and will not affect browsing data.


WE AND OUR PARTNERS PROCESS DATA TO:

Store and/or access information on a device. Create a personalised ads profile.
Select basic ads. Select personalised ads. Measure ad performance. Apply market
research to generate audience insights. Develop and improve products. Precise
geolocation data, and identification through device scanning. Personalised ads
and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and product
development. List of Partners (vendors)

I Accept Reject All Show Purposes