www.texasstandard.org Open in urlscan Pro
141.193.213.11  Public Scan

Form analysis
2 forms found in the DOM

GET https://www.texasstandard.org

<form action="https://www.texasstandard.org" method="GET">
  <input type="text" name="s" value="Start Typing..." data-placeholder="Start Typing..." style="font-size: 43px; height: 59px; top: 46.5px;">
  <div id="innersearch" class="hidden"><a href="#"><span class="icon-salient-search" aria-hidden="true"></span></a></div>
</form>

GET https://www.texasstandard.org

<form action="https://www.texasstandard.org" method="GET">
  <input type="text" name="s" value="" placeholder="Search..">
</form>

Text Content

 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 

 * All Our Stories
 * TOPICS
   * Agriculture & Animals
   * Arts & Culture
     * Books
     * Bug Bites
     * Film & TV
     * Food & Drink
     * History
     * Music
     * Sounds of Texas
       * Heel To Toe
     * Sports
     * Stories From Texas
     * Texan Translation
     * Typewriter Rodeo
     * Weekend Trip Tips
     * Where There’s Smoke
   * Border & Immigration
   * Business & Economy
   * Crime & Justice
   * Disability in Texas
   * Education
   * Energy & Environment
   * Government & Politics
     * Child Welfare
     * PolitiFact Texas
     * Week in Texas Politics
   * Health & Science
   * Housing
   * Military and Veterans’ Affairs
   * Partner Organizations
     * Texas Newsroom
   * Race & Identity
   * Tech & Innovation
   * Transportation
 * FIND A SHOW
   * Podcasts
     * Texas Standard
     * Stories from Texas
     * Typewriter Rodeo
   * Recent Shows
     * 02/07/2024
     * 02/06/2024
     * 02/05/2024
     * 02/02/2024
     * 02/01/2024
   * Specials
   * Show Archives
   * Whole Shows
 * About Us
   * How to Listen
   * FAQ
   * Newsletter
   * Contact Us


 * All Our Stories
 * TOPICS
   * Agriculture & Animals
   * Arts & Culture
     * Books
     * Bug Bites
     * Film & TV
     * Food & Drink
     * History
     * Music
     * Sounds of Texas
       * Heel To Toe
     * Sports
     * Stories From Texas
     * Texan Translation
     * Typewriter Rodeo
     * Weekend Trip Tips
     * Where There’s Smoke
   * Border & Immigration
   * Business & Economy
   * Crime & Justice
   * Disability in Texas
   * Education
   * Energy & Environment
   * Government & Politics
     * Child Welfare
     * PolitiFact Texas
     * Week in Texas Politics
   * Health & Science
   * Housing
   * Military and Veterans’ Affairs
   * Partner Organizations
     * Texas Newsroom
   * Race & Identity
   * Tech & Innovation
   * Transportation
 * FIND A SHOW
   * Podcasts
     * Texas Standard
     * Stories from Texas
     * Typewriter Rodeo
   * Recent Shows
     * 02/07/2024
     * 02/06/2024
     * 02/05/2024
     * 02/02/2024
     * 02/01/2024
   * Specials
   * Show Archives
   * Whole Shows
 * About Us
   * How to Listen
   * FAQ
   * Newsletter
   * Contact Us
 * 




KEN PAXTON IS SUING FIVE TEXAS CITIES OVER THEIR MARIJUANA DECRIMINALIZATION
ORDINANCES

The municipalities each approved ballot measures in 2022 that would
‘deprioritize’ enforcement of weed laws.



SHARE THIS STORY WITH A FRIEND:

 * Facebook
 * X
 * Email
 * 

By Alexandra HartFebruary 7, 2024 2:24 pmCrime & Justice, Government & Politics,
Texas Standard Original

Jorge Sanhueza-Lyon / KUT News

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

Back in 2022, voters in five municipalities in Texas – Austin, Elgin, Killeen,
Denton and San Marcos – approved ballot measures that would decriminalize
low-level marijuana possession. The initiative was led by Ground Game Texas, a
progressive organization whose polity priorities include protections for
“workers, wages and weed.”

In all five cities, the ordinances had overwhelming support: 85% of Austin
voters were in favor, while Killeen, with the lowest share of votes in favor,
still passed the measure with 69% voting “yay.”

Now, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is suing to block the ordinances, saying
they run afoul of state law. In a press release last week, Paxton said the
cities “violate the lawful statutes designed to protect the public from crime,
drugs, and violence.”

At least one nonprofit, Decriminalize Denton, has said it will be filing a
petition to have Paxton’s lawsuit dismissed on the grounds that it has no legal
standing. But according to marijuana law expert Frank Snyder of the Texas A&M
University School of Law, Paxton may indeed have a case.

Snyder spoke with the Texas Standard about the ordinances, Paxton’s challenge,
and what we can expect to see as the legal fight plays out.

This transcript has been edited lightly for clarity:

Texas Standard: Five Texas cities passed these ordinances in 2022: Austin, San
Marcos, Killeen, Elgin, Denton. Remind us what these ordinances do.

Frank Snyder: Essentially, they prohibit police officers in those cities – and
other enforcement officials – from going after low-level marijuana offenses such
as possession. Essentially, the ordinance says that the cities are
de-prioritizing marijuana enforcement.

And what does de-prioritizing mean?

It means, essentially, that while it’s still illegal, and the police still can
do it, they should put that at the very bottom of the list and should not, in
fact, be arresting people simply for possession of relatively small amounts of
marijuana.

Well, as you’re probably aware, the attorney general says he will “not stand
idly by as cities run by pro-crime extremists deliberately violate Texas law.”
What sort of argument is he making here, that there is something in particular
in these cities that is illegal under Texas law?

Yeah, I mean, shorn of the rhetoric, what he’s basically saying is Texas makes
marijuana illegal under its Controlled Substances Act and under the federal
Controlled Substances Act. Cities like the ones you mentioned have home rule,
which allows them to pass ordinances that have the effect of law so long as
under the Texas Constitution, they don’t conflict with the laws passed by the
Legislature.

These laws theoretically don’t violate that particular provision. But Texas also
has a statute that says no municipality may refuse to enforce the drug laws.
That was passed back in 1997, actually. And thus these ordinances directly
conflict with state law. And the attorney general is arguing that they therefore
can’t stand.

» GET MORE NEWS FROM AROUND THE STATE: Sign up for Texas Standard’s weekly
newsletters

Well, does Paxton’s lawsuit then hold any legal weight, or is this all about
politics? How do you see it?

There may well be politics involved in it, but it looks to me like the suits are
very well-grounded. You know, there’s been another suit out, the Bell
County-Killeen suit, about whether the county could enforce these things. But
ordinarily, the state has the authority to override municipalities’ laws. And
therefore, in my view, the suit’s on solid legal grounds.

At least one organization, Decriminalize Denton, is seeking to have this lawsuit
dismissed. Where do you see this headed?

Well, they’re making an interesting – I haven’t seen their paperwork, but I’ve
heard about it – they’re making an argument that, in fact, it’s not really
having any effect, and therefore the suit is moot; there’s no reason to bring
the lawsuit.

My view in the courts is that Paxton is likely to prevail. Now, what that
entails – I mean, how you go about ordering the city officials to enforce laws
that they don’t want to enforce – that’s where things get tricky. Charging
someone with not enforcing the law, when in fact, district attorneys have
discretion about how to go about their duties, that raises really interesting
questions.

These cities, in some respects, don’t seem to be outliers, to the extent that
you can go just about anywhere in Texas – go to a truckstop or a convenience
store – and you’ll see gummies and and vapes and other products for sale. Many
of these products claim to contain THC-9.

It doesn’t seem like there’s a big push in the first place, even in some of the
cities that have not passed these ordinances. And I’m just curious about how
that lack of enforcement or apparent lack of enforcement might come into play
here in these arguments.

I think that’s a really great point. One of the things that’s complicating
things is how complicated the marijuana regulations are now. Plants with THC
levels above 0.3 are illegal. But if you take hemp and you process it enough,
you will get some THC out of it, which is theoretically legal under the federal
farm bill.

And so nobody really has figured out exactly where the line is on these
products. And they’re flooding the market, which makes it very difficult for
police to spend time, you know, wandering through convenience stores, looking
for products like this.

And so the advantage of a low-level enforcement prohibition is that it stops
police from taking lots of time trying to figure those things out. So that’s
what the voters presumably had in mind when they passed these ordinances.

If you found the reporting above valuable, please consider making a donation to
support it here. Your gift helps pay for everything you find
on texasstandard.org and KUT.org. Thanks for donating today.


SHARE THIS STORY WITH A FRIEND:

 * Facebook
 * X
 * Email
 * 


MORE FROM 02/07/2024

 * NOISY BITCOIN MINE PUTS GRANBURY RESIDENTS ON EDGE

 * HERE’S HOW TEX-MEX BECAME THE STAPLE CUISINE OF SUPER BOWL SUNDAY

 * AT GRID ‘SUMMIT’ IN HOUSTON, LT. GOV. DAN PATRICK AND BLACKROCK MAKE PITCH
   FOR NEW POWER PLANTS

 * TEXAS STANDARD FOR FEB. 7, 2024: BITCOIN MINERS CAME TO RURAL TEXAS – AND
   BROUGHT DISRUPTION WITH THEM




MOST VIEWED RIGHT NOW

 * TEXAS TOPAZ HUNTERS MUST NOW FIND OTHER WAYS TO LOOK FOR THE STATE GEMSTONE

 * BELOVED TEXAS VENTRILOQUIST IGNACIO ‘NACHO’ ESTRADA DIES AT 77

 * OIL DRILLERS ARE INCREASINGLY HOOKING UP TO THE GRID FOR POWER – POTENTIALLY
   STRAINING INFRASTRUCTURE

 * HOUSTON HALTS DEVELOPMENT IN GREATER FIFTH WARD CANCER CLUSTER FOLLOWING
   INVESTIGATION

 * ADVOCATES FILE FTC COMPLAINT AGAINST DELOITTE OVER MEDICAID ELIGIBILITY
   SOFTWARE ERRORS

 * PAXTON TARGETS TEXAS CITIES OVER MARIJUANA DECRIMINALIZATION POLICIES


NO MATTER WHERE YOU ARE,
YOU’RE ON TEXAS STANDARD TIME


THE TEXAS STANDARD IS A PARTNERSHIP OF






 * 

©2024 Texas Standard. A service of the Moody College of Communication at the
University of Texas at Austin | Contact us



Notifications