www.alps.foundation Open in urlscan Pro
198.185.159.145  Public Scan

Form analysis
1 forms found in the DOM

POST #

<form action="#" method="post" class="comment-form">
  <textarea class="comment-input" name="comment" data-defaulttext="Leave a comment here." data-edited="false"></textarea>
</form>

Text Content

We use cookies to provide website functionality and to analyze traffic on our
site. View our cookie policy.



Accept & Continue
0
Skip to Content



About
The Foundation
The Team
Contact
Become a Member
... of the Pale Blue Dot
Community
ALPS Conference
ALPS Events
Swiss Psychedelic Student Network
Swiss Psychedelic Student Forum
Events in Switzerland
Media
Blog
Photo Gallery
Social Media
Youtube
Podcast
Email Newsletter
ALPS in the news
Professional
Ongoing Collaborations
Partners
Geneva PAT Access Fund
Participate in research
Resources Corner
Volunteering Opportunities
Contact us

Donate
Open Menu Close Menu

Donate
About
The Foundation
The Team
Contact
Become a Member
... of the Pale Blue Dot
Community
ALPS Conference
ALPS Events
Swiss Psychedelic Student Network
Swiss Psychedelic Student Forum
Events in Switzerland
Media
Blog
Photo Gallery
Social Media
Youtube
Podcast
Email Newsletter
ALPS in the news
Professional
Ongoing Collaborations
Partners
Geneva PAT Access Fund
Participate in research
Resources Corner
Volunteering Opportunities
Contact us

Open Menu Close Menu

Folder: About
Folder: Community
Folder: Media
Folder: Professional

Donate
Back
The Foundation
The Team
Contact
Become a Member
... of the Pale Blue Dot
Back
ALPS Conference
ALPS Events
Swiss Psychedelic Student Network
Swiss Psychedelic Student Forum
Events in Switzerland
Back
Blog
Photo Gallery
Social Media
Youtube
Podcast
Email Newsletter
ALPS in the news
Back
Ongoing Collaborations
Partners
Geneva PAT Access Fund
Participate in research
Resources Corner
Volunteering Opportunities
Contact us


DO PSYCHEDELICS REALLY PRODUCE A MYSTICAL EXPERIENCE?

16 Dec
Written By Polina Ponomarenko

Currently, in the field of  psychedelic research, the most popular
psychometrically validated instrument is the “Five Dimensions of Altered States
of Consciousness Questionnaire” (5D-ASC), closely followed by Mystical
Experience Questionnaire (MEQ30). The latter is used to analyse the general
phenomenon of a mystical experience, what the underlying neural mechanisms of it
are, and whether it can predict therapeutic efficacy. But how come so many
people describe psychedelic experiences as mystical? Or maybe the question is,
who started to use this terminology and why?


WHAT IS A MYSTICAL EXPERIENCE?




In research we commonly refer to a mystical experience as a transient
multi-dimensional state as defined by British philosopher Walter Terence Stace
in 1960. These include the experience of profound unity with all that exists, a
felt sense of sacredness, a sense of the experience of truth and reality at a
fundamental level (also called the noetic quality), deeply felt positive mood,
transcendence of time and space (or transiency), and difficulty explaining the
experience in words (or ineffability).

His book titled “Mysticism and philosophy” (1960) is the one that most
researchers cite today as the origin of the MEQ. It showcases his vast interest
for different world religions, metaphysics, and philosophies, as well as ethics
and logic. His goal was to find the core characteristics between them such that
one could reliably define what a universal mystical experience entails. 



Three years after the publication of his book Walter Norman Pahnke, an American
minister, physician, and psychiatrist, got inspired by this work. He took it as
the basis to develop the first version of the MEQ during his PhD thesis called
“Drugs and Mysticism” at Harvard University. Pahnke used it during what is now
called the "Good Friday Experiment": an experiment where ten theology students
were given 30 mg of psilocybin (which is a high dose) and another ten were given
the active placebo Niacin (vitamin B3) in a religious setting (a friday service)
to see whether psilocybin could help to produce a genuine religious experience
in its participants. The result was clear: nine out of ten students on
psilocybin reported a religious experience (unsurprising maybe for theology
students). Three to four students even reached what he called a “complete”
mystical experience (characterised by at least 60%-70% in the questionnaire),
which none of the placebo group students did. 

For a long follow up of this experiment, click here.


THE VALIDATION OF THE MEQ30



Since research on psychedelics had to stop for around 40 years due to  political
reasons, a newer version of the MEQ emerged in 2006 revised by Roland R.
Griffiths, a psychopharmacologist at Johns Hopkins University. In his paper, he
investigated whether the same 30 mg of psilocybin (per 70 kg of bodyweight)
induced a mystical experience in healthy participants with no prior psychedelic
experiences. However, given Griffith’s personal interest in meditation, he also
added another inclusion criteria that all participants should hold a regular
practice in religious or spiritual activities (such as mediation, prayer, or a
religious choir). The outcome was very positive: 61% of the participants
fulfilled Pahnke’s criteria for having the “complete” mystical experience, which
was even higher than in the Good Friday Experiment.

Today it is often being considered as the starting point of the exponential
growth of research into this unified psychedelic-induced mystical experience.
Many other research groups also started to experiment with clinical populations,
such as people with various types of addictions or depression. Most of these
studies found indeed that the “complete mystical experience” could reliably
predict  treatment success (for more details, see this meta-analysis). 

However, knowing now the MEQ30’s origin history, I asked myself: 

If this questionnaire was validated on people who already had an ongoing
spiritual interest and practice, then this questionnaire’s language must be
adapted to them. However, people from clinical trials surely are not all
spiritually active so perhaps they wouldn’t  entirely understand the mystical
terminology?

Furthermore, what would be the outcome for people who have no spiritual practice
in their daily life? Would then the occurrence of the mystical experience be
less present? As a consequence, would there be less association between the
mystical experience and the improvement of mental health symptoms?

So I checked out the 30 items of this questionnaire. 


MEQ30 ITEMS

Picture taken from this paper 

We can see that the definition of the “mystical experience” is reduced from the
previously mentioned six dimensions to four. The first one is called mystical
and mostly includes feelings like “all is one”, “ultimate reality”, “eternity”,
“freedom”, “fusion”, and “reverence”. The second dimension positive mood
describes “amazement”, “tranquillity”, “ecstasy”, “joy”, and “awesomeness”. The
third dimension space/time consists predominantly of the “loss of a sense of
space and time”. And the last dimension ineffability encompasses the feeling
that “you actually cannot describe your state in words”. 

Looking closely at each item, I am beginning to understand how the authors tried
to use universally understandable language, especially in the dimensions 2, 3,
and 4. However it does seem that these dimensions are not necessarily describing
something “mystical”, but are rather just byproducts of it. It seems to me that
these dimensions could stand on their own in most of what people would describe
as a pleasurable experience on psychedelics (for example the ones used called
“good drug effects” on a visual analogue scale).

On the other hand, the first dimension describes what I (being a white European
woman of my time) would associate to some sort of spiritual practice that is
known to me, such as the typical “spiritual awakening” that is taught as a
christian concept or described in the teachings of famous mystics like Erkhart
Tolle. To judge the actual universality of this concept, I would want to conduct
research questioning a sufficient number of people from different backgrounds on
how much they can understand and relate to it. However I do not see this kind of
research being done anywhere right now. 

Additionally, from the field work of anthropologist David Dupuis on the
socialisation of hallucinations I can derive that the individual experiences on
psychedelic drugs can vary drastically between cultures. It comes to no surprise
that people who meditate or go to the church regularly and are exposed to
spiritual concepts are more prone to experience such things also on psychedelics
and will attribute these positively. 

So what does the MEQ30 really measure? To me it seems that it accurately
measures whether a person who is already interested in spirituality will be
positively affected by spiritual concepts during psychedelic trips. Now, it is
true that spiritual practices have had a positive impact on us humans providing
us with comfort, a sense of meaning, understanding and hope, but on the other
side they also lead to devastating consequences ranging from outgroup biases to
genocide. Some people warn about how our globalised, capitalised, and mediatised
society is driving us more and more into a spiritual crisis or meaning crisis,
to which spiritual practices offer an alternative and often healing. A first
review on the therapeutic efficacy of the mystical experience on psychedelics
shows these good outcomes as well. 

Buddhist practice teaches us that everything is transient (which I do find very
comforting), so I am curious to find out how this field will evolve in future.
In the name of Rick Doblin’s “political science”, I see the good intentions
behind this way of research. And as Friedrich Nietzsche once wrote: 

“Gesetzt, dass nichts Anderes als real "gegeben" ist als unsere Welt der
Begierden und Leidenschaften, dass wir zur keine anderen "Realität" hinab oder
hinauf können als gerade zur Realität unserer Triebe - denn Denken ist nur ein
Verhalten dieser Triebe zu einander.” 

(engl.: “Assuming that nothing else is "given" as real than our world of desires
and passions, that we cannot go down or up to any other "reality" than just to
the reality of our drives - because thinking is only a behaviour of these drives
to each other.”)



Polina Ponomarenko

COO of ALPS Foundation


COMMENTS (0)

Newest First Oldest First Newest First Most Liked Least Liked
Preview Post Comment…

Previous
Previous


THE INCREDIBLE STORY OF ARTAUD LE MÔMO

Next
Next


DRUG-INDUCED SYNESTHESIA AND GENUINE SYNESTHESIA – A COMPARABLE PHENOMENON?




ALPS FOUNDATION

Awareness Lectures on Psychedelics in Switzerland

Rue du Beulet 11 - 1203
Geneva, Switzerland
Info@alps.foundation
+41 77 210 50 33

 

FOLLOW US



© 2022 ALPS Foundation | Web design by ALPS Team & Artwork by Elyse Dodge