institutdelors.eu Open in urlscan Pro
188.165.51.93  Public Scan

Submitted URL: http://xm3g0.mjt.lu/lnk/AMYAAINwy2kAAcv2cs4AAAAjI0QAAAAAF54AAApdAA72hABixa6t4Qg9Q8_XQCKWErnBDF3oWgAOxBY/2/CsK84skD7D...
Effective URL: https://institutdelors.eu/en/publications/one-step-closer-to-adequate-minimum-wages-in-the-eu/
Submission: On July 06 via api from PL — Scanned from DE

Form analysis 0 forms found in the DOM

Text Content

CE SITE WEB UTILISE DES COOKIES.

Nous souhaitons utiliser des cookies et des traceurs pour notamment vous
proposer des contenus ciblés adaptés à vos centres d’intérêts, ou réaliser des
statistiques de visites. Lisez notre politique de confidentialité pour connaître
l’ensemble des informations sur notre usage de vos données à caractèrepersonnel.
[#OOI_PERSONAL_INFORMATION#]
Cookies nécessaires uniquement Autoriser tous les cookies Afficher les détails
OK
Cookies nécessaires uniquement Autoriser la sélection Autoriser tous les cookies
Nécessaires
Préférences
Statistiques
Marketing
Afficher les détails
Déclaration relative aux cookies [#IABV2SETTINGS#] À propos des cookies
 Nécessaires (5)  Préférences (0)  Statistiques (3)  Marketing (13)  Non classés
(1)
Les cookies nécessaires contribuent à rendre un site web utilisable en activant
des fonctions de base comme la navigation de page et l'accès aux zones
sécurisées du site web. Le site web ne peut pas fonctionner correctement sans
ces cookies.

NomFournisseurFinalitéExpirationTypeCONSENT [x2]Google
YouTubeUtilisé pour détecter si le visiteur a accepté la catégorie marketing
dans la bannière de cookie. Ce cookie est nécessaire pour la conformité du site
Web avec le RGPD.2 annéesHTTPARRAffinityHelloassoUtilisé pour distribuer le
trafic du site web sur plusieurs serveurs afin d'optimiser les temps de
réponse.SessionHTTPARRAffinitySameSiteHelloassoUtilisé pour distribuer le trafic
du site web sur plusieurs serveurs afin d'optimiser les temps de
réponse.SessionHTTPCookieConsentCookiebotStocke l'autorisation d'utilisation de
cookies pour le domaine actuel par l'utilisateur 1 annéeHTTP

Les cookies de préférences permettent à un site web de retenir des informations
qui modifient la manière dont le site se comporte ou s’affiche, comme votre
langue préférée ou la région dans laquelle vous vous situez.

Nous n'utilisons pas de cookies de ce type.

Les cookies statistiques aident les propriétaires du site web, par la collecte
et la communication d'informations de manière anonyme, à comprendre comment les
visiteurs interagissent avec les sites web.

NomFournisseurFinalitéExpirationType_gaGoogleEnregistre un identifiant unique
utilisé pour générer des données statistiques sur la façon dont le visiteur
utilise le site.2 annéesHTTP_gatGoogleUtilisé par Google Analytics pour diminuer
radicalement le taux de requêtes1 jourHTTP_gidGoogleEnregistre un identifiant
unique utilisé pour générer des données statistiques sur la façon dont le
visiteur utilise le site.1 jourHTTP

Les cookies marketing sont utilisés pour effectuer le suivi des visiteurs au
travers des sites web. Le but est d'afficher des publicités qui sont pertinentes
et intéressantes pour l'utilisateur individuel et donc plus précieuses pour les
éditeurs et annonceurs tiers.

NomFournisseurFinalitéExpirationTypeWIDGET::local::assignmentsSoundcloudUtilisé
par la plateforme audio SoundCloud pour mettre en œuvre, mesurer et améliorer
leur contenus / services intégrés sur le site web - La collecte de données
inclut également l’interaction des visiteurs avec le contenu / service intégré.
Cela peut être utilisé à des fins statistiques ou de
marketing.PersistentHTMLVISITOR_INFO1_LIVEYouTubeTente d'estimer la bande
passante des utilisateurs sur des pages avec des vidéos YouTube intégrées.179
joursHTTPYSCYouTubeEnregistre un identifiant unique pour conserver des
statistiques sur les vidéos de YouTube vues par
l'utilisateur.SessionHTTPytidb::LAST_RESULT_ENTRY_KEYYouTubeStocke les
préférences de lecture vidéo de l'utilisateur pour les vidéos YouTube
incorporéesPersistentHTMLyt-remote-cast-availableYouTubeStocke les préférences
de lecture vidéo de l'utilisateur pour les vidéos YouTube
incorporéesSessionHTMLyt-remote-cast-installedYouTubeStocke les préférences de
lecture vidéo de l'utilisateur pour les vidéos YouTube
incorporéesSessionHTMLyt-remote-connected-devicesYouTubeStocke les préférences
de lecture vidéo de l'utilisateur pour les vidéos YouTube
incorporéesPersistentHTMLyt-remote-device-idYouTubeStocke les préférences de
lecture vidéo de l'utilisateur pour les vidéos YouTube
incorporéesPersistentHTMLyt-remote-fast-check-periodYouTubeStocke les
préférences de lecture vidéo de l'utilisateur pour les vidéos YouTube
incorporéesSessionHTMLyt-remote-session-appYouTubeStocke les préférences de
lecture vidéo de l'utilisateur pour les vidéos YouTube
incorporéesSessionHTMLyt-remote-session-nameYouTubeStocke les préférences de
lecture vidéo de l'utilisateur pour les vidéos YouTube
incorporéesSessionHTMLyt.innertube::nextIdYouTubeEnregistre un identifiant
unique pour conserver des statistiques sur les vidéos de YouTube vues par
l'utilisateur.PersistentHTMLyt.innertube::requestsYouTubeEnregistre un
identifiant unique pour conserver des statistiques sur les vidéos de YouTube
vues par l'utilisateur.PersistentHTML

Les cookies non classés sont les cookies qui sont en cours de classification,
ainsi que les fournisseurs de cookies individuels.

NomFournisseurFinalitéExpirationTypemail_sessionMailjetEn attente6 joursHTTP

 [#IABV2_LABEL_PURPOSES#]  [#IABV2_LABEL_FEATURES#]  [#IABV2_LABEL_PARTNERS#]
[#IABV2_BODY_PURPOSES#]
[#IABV2_BODY_FEATURES#]
[#IABV2_BODY_PARTNERS#]
Les cookies sont des petits fichiers textes qui peuvent être utilisés par les
sites web pour rendre l'expérience utilisateur plus efficace.

La loi stipule que nous ne pouvons stocker des cookies sur votre appareil que
s’ils sont strictement nécessaires au fonctionnement de ce site. Pour tous les
autres types de cookies, nous avons besoin de votre permission.

Ce site utilise différents types de cookies. Certains cookies sont placés par
les services tiers qui apparaissent sur nos pages.

À tout moment, vous pouvez modifier ou retirer votre consentement dès la
Déclaration relative aux cookies sur notre site web.

En savoir plus sur qui nous sommes, comment vous pouvez nous contacter et
comment nous traitons les données personnelles veuillez voir notre Politique de
confidentialité.

Veuillez indiquer l'identifiant de votre consentement et la date à laquelle vous
nous avez contactés concernant votre consentement.
Déclaration relative aux cookies mise à jour le 02.07.22 par Cookiebot
Skip to content

THINKING EUROPE • PENSER L’EUROPE • EUROPA DENKEN

PENSER L’EUROPE • THINKING EUROPE • EUROPA DENKEN


Go to...
 * 
 * 
 * Support us
 * Stay in touch !
 * Join us
 * Advanced Search

X
PUBLICATIONS
EVENTS
FR
|
EN
Who are we ?
Our organisation and financing
Areas of research
Contacts Presse
About us
Stay in touch !
Support us
Join us
Medias
Our networks
Académie Notre Europe
Europe Jacques Delors (Brussels)
Headlines
Infographics
Euroquestions
French Presidency of the Council of the EU
Covid-19
Russia
Contacts




Blog post






One step closer to adequate minimum wages in the EU





| 15/06/2022


| Klervi Kerneïs |

| Labour and social affairs



Download pdf →  | ← Download epub

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Recommended citation:
Kerneïs K. 2022. “One step closer to adequate minimum wages in the EU“,
Blogpost, Paris: Jacques Delors Institute, 15th June.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ahead of the Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs Council
(EPSCO) on June 16th, during which the provisional agreement on the Directive on
adequate minimum wages in the EU will be put to a vote, we take a look back at
this landmark EU initiative, provide some insights on the final compromise, and
more broadly, clarify what is at stake for European workers.   

Context and original proposal

Putting forward a legislative proposal on minimum wages was one of the key
promises made by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen to European
workers. The goal was to tackle in-work poverty, which increased from 8.3% to
9.4% between 2007 and 2018,[1] and contribute to implement the European Pillar
of Social Rights, proclaimed in 2017 under her predecessor Jean-Claude Juncker.
In the meantime, the COVID pandemic struck, and, as one of the consequences,
sectors with high proportions of low wages, made up of the so-called ‘essential
workers’, no longer remained below the political radar. Today, as EU citizens
are facing rising prices and many are struggling to make ends meet, the
Directive has found yet another purpose: protecting low-wage workers against
inflation.

The proposal did not receive the warmest welcome from the get-go though. Nordic
countries were especially reluctant to see the EU legislate on such matter for
fear of damaging their national welfare systems. In six EU countries (Sweden,
Denmark, Finland, Austria, Italy, Cyprus), wages are indeed set exclusively
through collective bargaining and thus do not have a statutory minimum wage.
Some central and eastern countries, in particular Hungary, were also finding the
Directive to trample on their national sovereignty and would have preferred the
issue to be left entirely up to the Member States. For others though, such as
France, Luxembourg, Belgium, Italy and Spain, the Directive was seen as an
opportunity to accelerate wage convergence in the EU – the statutory minimum
wage in Luxembourg is about 7 times higher than the one in Bulgaria, and about 3
times higher when we take into account national prices[2] – and therefore fight
social dumping.

The Commission thus had to walk a fine line between these different political
perspectives, while being careful not to stray too far away from the Treaties’
provisions, whereby pay is explicitly excluded from the competences of the
EU.[3] The proposal put forward in October 2020 reflected these various
constraints.

Still, the Commission managed to clearly outline its two main objectives for the
Directive. Firstly, and only for the 21 Member States concerned, the proposal
aims to ensure the adequacy of statutory minimum wages, meaning that they must
allow workers to live in a decent manner. Behind this somewhat vague concept of
‘adequacy’, the Commission proposed several mandatory criteria, namely
purchasing power, the level, growth and distribution of wages, as well as labour
productivity (Article 5). The text provided that internationally recognised
reference values may be used to guide countries in their evaluations, and that
minimum wages ought to be updated regularly (Article 5). The tabled Directive
also put forward provisions on possibilities for exemptions (Article 6), on the
involvement of social partners (Article 7) as well as on ways to enhance the
access of workers to this protection (Article 8). Secondly, the Directive was
designed to promote collective bargaining in all EU Member States (Article 4)
since countries with high collective bargaining coverage tend to have higher
minimum wages, less low-wage earners, and lower wage inequalities. The proposal
thus intended to strengthen the capacity of social partners and encourage
negotiations on wages among them. It also stated that Member States where
collective bargaining coverage falls below 70% must provide a framework of
enabling conditions and an action plan to promote collective bargaining.
Horizontal provisions on public procurement, data collection and monitoring as
well as right to redress and penalties (Article 9-12) were also included in the
draft legislation.

Negotiations and next steps  

At the end of 2021, the European Parliament and the Council both managed to
adopt their respective positions. The Parliament reinforced the text in several
ways, for instance by making in-work poverty and a national basket of goods and
services at real prices into two of the criteria to assess the adequacy of
minimum wages, and by demanding an annual actualisation of the said wages. The
Parliament also raised the objective for collective bargaining coverage to 80%
of the workforce, removed the article on derogations (without forbidding them
explicitly) and added important provisions to protect trade unions and their
representatives throughout the text. On the side of the Council, the agreement
on a general approach under the Slovenian presidency was deemed as a surprise
due to the sensitive nature of the file. The compromise made exemptions to some
minimum wages as well as provisions on monitoring, controls and data collection
more flexible than in the Commission’s proposal. It also removed references to
internationally recognised reference values to guide the assessment of minimum
wages and changed the objective for collective bargaining coverage into a simple
‘threshold’. In the end, only two Member States voted against the proposal
(Denmark and Hungary) and two abstained (Austria, and Germany due to the
national political situation at the time) – even Sweden, which was, with
Denmark, arguably one of the main opponents of the Directive, ended up
supporting it.

Because the Parliament’s position strengthened the text while the Council went
on to protect national traditions and practices as much as possible (no doubt
many ‘red lines’ within the Council depended on these safeguards), room for
manoeuvre for interinstitutional negotiations seemed very narrow. And indeed,
eight trilogues were necessary over the course of five months to strike a deal,
from the first trilogue on January 13th to the last one on June 6th, 2022. This
was also seen as a concrete victory for the French Presidency of the Council of
the EU, which had made the file into one of its hallmarks.

Eventually, each legislator was able to take home part of its demands. The
Parliament managed to maintain the mention of the reference values of 60% of the
median wage and 50% of the average wage as well as the one relating to the
basket of goods and services at real prices, but was unsuccessful in adding the
in-work poverty criteria. The Council trumped the Parliament’s ambitions when it
came to the criteria of productivity, which remained in the text, and to the
article on the possibility for exceptions and variations (although the need for
a legitimate objective was still brought back from the Commission’s initial
proposal). A major win for the Parliament was the raised ambition for collective
bargaining coverage, together with increased protection for trade unions.
Finally, the Council managed to maintain the mandatory actualisation of
statutory minimum wages every two years and added an exception of every four
years for Member States with indexation mechanisms in place.

The text was presented to the COREPER on June 8th and left to be examined by the
ambassadors. It is to be formally adopted on June 16th, during the EPSCO
Council. Sweden seems to have backpedalled on its support for the text, despite
negotiators insisting that its concerns were incorporated into the final
compromise. However, it is unlikely that this will affect the outcome of the
Council decision, since qualified majority is more than likely to be reached
with or without Sweden’s support. In parallel, the provisional agreement will
also have to be approved by the European Parliament Committee on Employment and
Social affairs, and at a forthcoming plenary session.

Reception and outlook

While the agreement has been mostly seen as a positive step for a more social
Europe and the protection of workers, many are concerned about the actual reach
of the Directive: if it does not impose a statutory minimum wage in each Member
State, nor sets a minimum threshold that would raise minimum wages in most
countries, what concrete impact will the Directive have on workers?

According to the Commission’s impact assessment, up to 24 million people could
benefit from this new legislation, depending on the extent to which Member
States increase their statutory minimum wages. But these estimates are actually
based on the two reference values (60% of the median wage and 50% of the average
wage) that are only included in the Directive as guidance values for Member
States, and not as objectives per se as called for by the European Trade Union
Confederation, among other stakeholders. Even then, workers in France and
Portugal would for instance have remained mostly unaffected since their minimum
wages are already above or approximating 60% of the national median wage and 50%
of the average wage. The Directive will impact Member States differently as the
share of minimum wage earners vary across countries, so that countries like
Lithuania may be significantly affected by the legislation.

The Directive is also expected to contribute to reducing the gender pay gap
since women are more likely than men to be minimum wage earners. In addition, if
well implemented, the Directive should contribute to boost collective
bargaining, which has been on a downward slope for a while in the EU, falling
from 66% in 2000 to 56% in 2018, with substantial declines in Central and
Eastern Europe especially.[4] Despite the fear of the Nordics, the Directive
could actually be a way to export their efficient collective bargaining model in
other parts of Europe and spread its benefits.

To guarantee that the Directive’s objectives are fully realized, the Commission
will need to monitor its implementation in Member States and evaluate its
effectiveness. However, it is also up to governments to seize the opportunities
provided by the Directive and show some ambition at national level, beyond the
minimum standards agreed upon at EU level (this could include the systematic use
of the abovementioned reference values).

Besides, the text has a strong symbolic reach. Principle 6 of the European
Pillar of Social Rights states that “workers have the right to fair wages that
provide for a decent standard of living”. The entry into force of the Directive
would show that the Pillar is more than a declaration of good intentions, but
that its principles are to be made into concrete proposals, and eventually,
effective instruments to improve the lives of EU citizens. Furthermore, looking
at EU-wide surveys, social inequalities are seen as the top challenge for the
EU, and nine out of ten Europeans claim that a social Europe is important to
them personally.[5] The need for rules on minimum wages in the EU was also one
of the key recommendations submitted by citizens participating in the Conference
on the Future of Europe.[6]

Nevertheless, we must insist on the fact that this Directive should not be seen
as a panacea to guarantee good working and living conditions for EU citizens.
Further ambitious pieces of legislations at EU level will need to follow in
order to continue working towards such goal. The upcoming Directive on platform
workers could lead to the potential reclassification of up to 4.1 million
people, leading to better social security coverage and increased annual
earnings, which would in turn help to reduce in-work poverty.[7] Very
importantly, an EU framework on minimum income would be a gamechanger for the 95
million people at risk of poverty and social exclusion in the EU, almost 22% of
the total population.[8] While the Commission is planning to table a proposal
for a Council Recommendation on adequate minimum income schemes next autumn, we
can wonder whether more legally binding legislation would not have been more
appropriate. It should be recalled that the EU had not managed to reach its
Europe 2020 target of reducing the number of people living in poverty or social
exclusion by 20 million. If it wants to meet its new target set at the Porto
Social Summit in May 2021 – to lift at least 15 million people out of poverty by
2030 – no effort should be spared.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

References

[1] European Commission (2020), Impact Assessment accompanying the Proposal for
a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on adequate minimum
wages in the European Union, SWD(2020) 245 final, 28 October.

[2] S. Fernandes & K. Kerneïs (2022), A move toward adequate minimum wages in
the EU?, Infographic, Jacques Delors Institute, 10 January.

[3] Article 153(5) TFEU.

[4] European Commission (2020), Op. Cit.

[5] European Commission (2022), Special Eurobarometer 517 on the future of
Europe, January; European Commission (2021), Special Eurobarometer 509 on social
issues, March.

[6] European Union (2022), Conference on the future of Europe: Report on the
final outcome, May.

[7] European Commission (2021), Impact assessment accompanying the Proposal for
a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council On improving working
conditions in platform work, SWD(2021) 396 final, 9 December.

[8] Eurostat (2022), People at risk of poverty or social exclusion.




SUR LE MÊME THÈME


ON THE SAME THEME




Labour | Minimum wage | Social Europe





PUBLICATIONS




PARENTS’ LEAVES IN THE EU

Infographic
05/07/2022 | Klervi Kerneïs |


YOUNG PEOPLE’S ATTITUDES TOWARDS THE EU

Infographic
25/05/2022 | Klervi Kerneïs | Sofia Fernandes |
Labour and social affairs

WELCOMING UKRAINIAN REFUGEES IN THE EU

Brief
20/04/2022 | Klervi Kerneïs |

Voir plus
Load more





MÉDIAS


MEDIAS




«LA PANDÉMIE A AGI COMME UN ÉLECTROCHOC MONTRANT LES FAILLES DU DISPOSITIF
EUROPÉEN DE SANTÉ ACTUEL»

Podcast
06/07/2022 | Isabelle Marchais |
Labour and social affairs

« FIT FOR 55 » : APRÈS L’ACCORD AU CONSEIL, LES EURODÉPUTÉS ALERTENT SUR LE
RISQUE DE RÉSURGENCE DES GILETS JAUNES

Interview
05/07/2022 | Camille Defard |
Energy and climate

UNION EUROPÉENNE : QUEL BILAN DE LA PRÉSIDENCE FRANÇAISE ?

Interview
05/07/2022 | Sébastien Maillard |

Voir plus
Load more





ÉVÉNEMENTS


EVENTS





31.


05

MY EUROPE – THE EUROPEAN UNION, ALLY OR DANGER FOR WORKERS? [FR]

Event
31/05/2022 | Passé | Klervi Kerneïs |



07.


10

THE EUROPEAN UNION AND WORK: WHAT COMPETENCES, WHAT DEBATES, WHAT PERSPECTIVES?
[FR]

Speech
07/10/2021 | Passé | Klervi Kerneïs |



05.


05

WHAT PLACE FOR RESPONSIBLE CAPITALISM IN EUROPE? (FR)

Event
05/05/2021 | Passé | Enrico Letta | Sébastien Maillard |
Labour and social affairs
Voir plus
Load more


Institut Jacques Delors

18, rue de Londres 75009 Paris – France

info@delorsinstitute.eu

CONDITIONS GÉNÉRALES D’UTILISATION

POLITIQUE DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ

MENTIONS LÉGALES
Edition du site
Le site www.institutdelors.eu est un site édité par l’Institut Jacques Delors.
L’Institut Jacques Delors est une association loi 1901 dont le siège social est
à Paris (75009) au 18, rue de Londres. L’association est représentée par son
directeur, Sébastien Maillard. Les propos et textes édités sur ce site
n’engagent que la responsabilité de leur auteur. Directeur de la publication :
Sébastien Maillard. Présidents : Enrico Letta, Pascal Lamy, Jacques Delors.
Propriété intellectuelle
L’ensemble de ce site relève de la législation française et internationale sur
le droit d’auteur et la propriété intellectuelle. Tous les droits de
reproductions sont réservés, y compris les représentations iconographiques et
photographiques.
Données personnelles
Se référer à notre politique de confidentialité.
Modification du site 
L’équipe éditoriale se réserve le droit de modifier ou de corriger le contenu de
ce site et de ces mentions légales à tout moment et ceci sans préavis.
Hébergeur
Le site www.institutdelors est hébergé par la société OVH, SAS au capital de 10
069 020 € RCS Lille Métropole 424 761 419 00045. Code APE 2620Z N° TVA : FR 22
424 761 419. Siège social : 2 rue Kellermann – 59100 Roubaix – France. Directeur
de la publication : Octave KLABA.

Réalisation du site
Site web réalisé par Etic INSA Technologies.

Jacques Delors Institute

18, rue de Londres 75009 Paris – France

info@delorsinstitute.eu

TERMS OF SERVICE

PRIVACY POLICY

LEGAL MENTIONS
Edition of the site
The site www.institutdelors.eu is a site edited by the Jacques Delors Institute.
The Jacques Delors Institute is an association under the 1901 law whose head
office is in Paris (75009) at 18, rue de Londres. The association is represented
by its director, Sébastien Maillard. The comments and texts published on this
site engage only the responsibility of their author. Director of publication:
Sébastien Maillard. Presidents: Enrico Letta, Pascal Lamy, Jacques Delors.
Intellectual property
This entire site is governed by French and international legislation on
copyright and intellectual property.All reproduction rights are reserved,
including iconographic and photographic representations.
Personal data
Refer to our privacy policy .
Modification of the site
The editorial team reserves the right to modify or correct the content of this
site and of these legal notices at any time and without notice.
Host
The site www.institutdelors is hosted by OVH, SAS with a capital of € 10,069,020
RCS Lille Métropole 424 761 419 00045. Code APE 2620Z VAT number: FR 22 424 761
419. Head office: 2 rue Kellermann – 59100 Roubaix – France. Director of
publication: Octave KLABA.

Website creation
The website has been created by Etic INSA Technologies, France.

Toggle Sliding Bar Area

PUBLICATIONS

EVENTS

 

WHO ARE WE ?

OUR ORGANISATION AND FINANCING

AREAS OF RESEARCH

ACADÉMIE NOTRE EUROPE

ENERGY CENTRE

PRESS CONTACTS

MEDIAS

CONTACT








Go to Top