aip.scitation.org
Open in
urlscan Pro
104.17.163.62
Public Scan
Submitted URL: https://aip-info.org/1XPS-7SEGB-285JYW-4QTI5D-1/c.aspx
Effective URL: https://aip.scitation.org/doi/full/10.1063/5.0026073?Track=&utm_source=AIP+Publishing&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=130824...
Submission Tags: falconsandbox
Submission: On April 01 via api from US — Scanned from DE
Effective URL: https://aip.scitation.org/doi/full/10.1063/5.0026073?Track=&utm_source=AIP+Publishing&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=130824...
Submission Tags: falconsandbox
Submission: On April 01 via api from US — Scanned from DE
Form analysis
2 forms found in the DOMName: quickSearch — GET /action/doSearch
<form action="/action/doSearch" name="quickSearch" class="quickSearchForm search-open resQuickSearchForm default-search-container" title="Quick Search" method="get">
<div class="container">
<div class="searchNav-tabs">
<ul class="search-tabs-nav" role="tablist">
<li id="search-tab" role="presentation" aria-selected="true" aria-controls="search-panel" data-tab-panel="search-panel">
<a aria-selected="true" tabindex="0" role="tab">SEARCH</a>
</li>
<li id="citation-search-tab" role="presentation" aria-selected="false" aria-controls="citation-search-panel" data-tab-panel="citation-search-panel">
<a aria-hidden="false" tabindex="0" role="tab">CITATION SEARCH</a>
</li>
<li id="advance-search-tab" role="presentation" aria-selected="false">
<a aria-hidden="false" tabindex="0" role="tab" href="/search/advanced">ADVANCED SEARCH</a>
</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="tab-content"> <!-- tab-content open -->
<div id="search-panel" class="tab-pane active" role="tabpanel" aria-labelledby="search-tab" aria-hidden="false">
<span class="searchDropDownDivLeft">
<label for="searchHeaderInSelector" class="visuallyhidden">Search in:</label>
<select id="searchHeaderInSelector" name="SeriesKey" class="custom-dropdown js__searchInSelector jcf-hidden" sb="41072169" style="display: none;">
<option value="apl" id="thisJournal" data-search-in="thisJournal"> This Publication </option>
<option value="false" data-search-in="default">Anywhere</option>
<option value="" data-search-in="thisPublisher"> This Publisher/Society </option>
</select><span class="jcf-select jcf-unselectable jcf-select-custom-dropdown jcf-select-js__searchInSelector" style="display: none;"><span class="jcf-select-text"><span class=""> This Publication </span></span><span
class="jcf-select-opener"></span></span>
<div id="sbHolder_41072169" class="sbHolder"><a id="sbToggle_41072169" href="#" class="sbToggle"></a><a id="sbSelector_41072169" href="#" class="sbSelector">
This Publication
</a>
<ul id="sbOptions_41072169" class="sbOptions" style="display: none;">
<li><a href="#apl" rel="apl">
This Publication
</a></li>
<li><a href="#false" rel="false">Anywhere</a></li>
<li><a href="#" rel="">
This Publisher/Society
</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</span>
</div>
<div id="citation-search-panel" aria-hidden="true" class="tab-pane clear hidden" role="tabpanel" aria-labelledby="citation-search-tab">
<div class="quicksearch-container">
<span class="citationSearchBoxContainer hidden">
<input name="quickLinkJournal" class="journalName mediumTextInput textIndent autocomplete ui-autocomplete-input" value="Applied Physics Letters" type="search" title="Journal" placeholder="Journal" autocomplete="off" autopopulate="true"
data-history-items-conf="3" data-publication-titles-conf="3" data-topics-conf="3" data-contributors-conf="3" data-auto-complete-target="title-auto-complete" disabled="disabled"><span role="status" aria-live="polite"
class="ui-helper-hidden-accessible"></span>
<input type="hidden" name="quickLink" value="true" disabled="disabled">
<input class="year smallTextInput" title="Year" type="search" name="quickLinkYear" value="" autocomplete="false" placeholder="Year" pattern="([0-9]){1,4}$" disabled="disabled">
<input class="volume smallTextInput" title="Volume" type="search" name="quickLinkVolume" value="" autocomplete="false" placeholder="Volume" pattern="^[a-zA-Z0-9]+$" disabled="disabled">
<input class="issue smallTextInput enable" title="Issue" type="search" name="quickLinkIssue" value="" autocomplete="false" placeholder="Issue" pattern="^[a-zA-Z0-9]+$" disabled="disabled">
<input class="page smallTextInput" title="Page" type="search" name="quickLinkPage" value="" autocomplete="false" placeholder="Page" pattern="^[a-zA-Z0-9]+$" disabled="disabled">
</span>
<span class="citationSearchBoxContainer hidden">
<button class="citation-mainSearchButton">
<span class="icon-search"></span>
</button>
</span>
</div>
</div>
</div> <!-- tab-content Close -->
<div class="quicksearch-container">
<div class="simpleSearchBoxContainer">
<input name="AllField" class="searchText magicsuggest main-search-field textIndent autocomplete ui-autocomplete-input" value="" type="search" id="searchText" title="Type search term here"
placeholder="Enter words / phrases / DOI / ISBN / authors / keywords / etc." autocomplete="off" data-history-items-conf="3" data-publication-titles-conf="3" data-group-titles-conf="3" data-publication-items-conf="3" data-topics-conf="3"
data-contributors-conf="3" data-display-labels="true" data-fuzzy-suggester="true" data-auto-complete-target="auto-complete"><span role="status" aria-live="polite" class="ui-helper-hidden-accessible"></span>
<input name="ConceptID" value="" type="hidden">
<button class="mainSearchButton">
<span class="sr-only">search</span>
<span class="icon-search icon-search-btn"></span>
</button>
</div>
<div class="quicksearch-actions">
<a class="responsiveAdvanceSearch" href="/search/advanced" title="Advanced">
<span class="visible-sm visible-xs">
Advanced
</span>
<span class="hidden-xs hidden-sm icon-advanced_search"></span>
</a>
</div>
</div>
<div class="cluetips">
<a class="citationHelp cluetips fancy-tooltip hidden" title="This option allows users to search by Publication, Volume and Page">This option allows users to search by Publication, Volume and Page</a>
<a class="journalHelp cluetips fancy-tooltip hidden" title="Selecting this option will search the current publication in context." style="display: inline;">Selecting this option will search the current publication in context.</a>
<a class="bookHelp cluetips fancy-tooltip hidden" title="Book Search tips">Book Search tips</a>
<a class="anywhereHelp cluetips fancy-tooltip hidden" title="Selecting this option will search all publications across the Scitation platform">Selecting this option will search all publications across the Scitation platform</a>
<a class="thisPublisherHelp cluetips fancy-tooltip hidden" title="Selecting this option will search all publications for the Publisher/Society in context">Selecting this option will search all publications for the Publisher/Society in context</a>
</div>
</div>
</form>
POST /action/doLogin
<form action="/action/doLogin" method="post">
<div class="login-form">
<input type="hidden" name="id" value="913494f4-bbf3-4bd3-90ce-dec60af6f5ed">
<input type="hidden" name="redirectUri"
value="/doi/full/10.1063/5.0026073?Track=&utm_source=AIP+Publishing&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=13082411_APL_+Piezoelectric+Thin+Films+for+MEMS.+Thermal+Radiation+at+the+Nanoscale+and+Applications_CFP&dm_i=1XPS%2C7SEGB%2C285JYW%2CVRQS2%2C1">
<input type="hidden" name="popup" value="true">
<input type="hidden" name="alertPopupLogin" value="true">
<div class="login-form-inputs">
<div class="input-group">
<div class="label ">
<label for="login">Email</label>
</div>
<input id="login" class="login" type="text" name="login" value="" size="15" placeholder="">
<div class="actions">
</div>
</div>
<div class="input-group">
<div class="label ">
<label for="password">Password</label>
</div>
<input id="password" class="password" type="password" name="password" value="" autocomplete="off" placeholder="">
<span class="password-eye-icon icon-eye hidden"></span>
<div class="actions">
<a href="/action/requestResetPassword">Forgot password?</a>
</div>
</div>
<div class="remember">
<div class="keepMeLogin">
<span class="label">Keep me logged in</span>
</div>
<div class="switch small-switch">
<input id="913494f4-bbf3-4bd3-90ce-dec60af6f5ed-remember" class="cmn-toggle cmn-toggle-round-flat jcf-ignore" title="Keep Me Logged In" type="checkbox" name="remember" value="true">
<label class="tgl-btn" for="913494f4-bbf3-4bd3-90ce-dec60af6f5ed-remember" title="Keep Me Logged In"></label>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="footer-buttons">
<input class="button submit primary" type="submit" name="submit" value="LOGIN" disabled="disabled">
</div>
</div>
</form>
Text Content
Öffnet in einem neuen Fenster Öffnet eine externe Website Öffnet eine externe Website in einem neuen Fenster <!---->Schließen Sie diesen Dialog<!----> Diese Website speichert Informationen auf Ihrem Gerät und greift auf diese zu, z. B. Cookies. Personenbezogene Daten wie Cookie-IDs, eindeutige Geräte-IDs und Browserinformationen können verarbeitet werden. Dritte können Informationen auf Ihrem Gerät speichern und darauf zugreifen und diese persönlichen Daten verarbeiten. Sie können Ihre Einstellungen ändern oder zurückziehen, indem Sie auf das Cookie-Symbol klicken. Infolgedessen werden möglicherweise keine relevanten Anzeigen oder personalisierten Inhalte angezeigt. Sie können Ihre Einstellungen jederzeit ändern oder die Standardeinstellungen übernehmen. Sie können dieses Banner schließen, um nur mit essenziellen Cookies fortzufahren. Datenschutz-Bestimmungen Speichereinstellungen Dritte * Lager * Marketing * Personalisierung * Analyse Speichern Alle akzeptieren Alles ablehnen <!---->Schließen Sie die Cookie-Einstellungen<!----> MENU SIGN IN Sign in/Register Enter words / phrases / DOI / ISBN / authors / keywords / etc. SEARCH CITATION SEARCH * SEARCH * CITATION SEARCH * ADVANCED SEARCH Search in: This Publication Anywhere This Publisher/Society This Publication This Publication * This Publication * Anywhere * This Publisher/Society search Advanced This option allows users to search by Publication, Volume and Page Selecting this option will search the current publication in context. Book Search tips Selecting this option will search all publications across the Scitation platform Selecting this option will search all publications for the Publisher/Society in context * Publishers * Books * Scilight * Conference Proceedings * Author Resources * Librarian Resources * Advertiser * Contact Us * FAQ * Help * * Publications View All Publications * Applied Physics Reviews * Applied Physics Letters * Journal of Applied Physics * The Journal of Chemical Physics * Physics Today * The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America * Review of Scientific Instruments * American Journal of Physics * Physics of Fluids * AIP Advances * View All Publications * Topics View All Topics * Acoustics * Biological Physics * Condensed Matter Physics * Energy * Materials Science * Mathematical Physics * Optics and Optical Physics * Physical Chemistry * Plasma Physics * Rheology and Fluid Dynamics * View All Topics Applied Physics Letters like and follow us Facebook * Most recent (RSS) * Most cited (RSS) SUBMIT YOUR ARTICLE * HOME * ISSUES * MORE * INFO * Overview * Editorial Board * News * FOR AUTHORS * Preparing Your Manuscript * Publication Charges * Author Resources * AIP Author Services * Submit * COLLECTIONS * Editor's Picks * Fast Track * Featured * Perspectives * Press Releases * Scilights * Special Topics * Upcoming Special Topics * ISSUES * INFO * Overview * Editorial Board * News * FOR AUTHORS * Preparing Your Manuscript * Publication Charges * Author Resources * AIP Author Services * Submit * COLLECTIONS * Editor's Picks * Fast Track * Featured * Perspectives * Press Releases * Scilights * Special Topics * Upcoming Special Topics SIGN UP FOR ALERTS THANK YOU FOR YOUR INTEREST IN APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS To sign up for alerts, please log in first. If you need an account, please register here Email Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in * ABSTRACT * DATA AVAILABILITY * REFERENCES LIGHT ABSORPTION AND NANOFOCUSING ON A TAPERED MAGNETIC METASURFACE * PDF * Tools * Download Citation * Add to favorites * Reprints and Permissions * Share E-mail Facebook Linkedin Twitter Reddit Mendeley Recommend to Librarians * Home > * Applied Physics Letters > * Volume 117, Issue 24 > * 10.1063/5.0026073 Prev Next RELATED ARTICLES Coherent perfect absorption in an all-dielectric metasurface Weiren Zhu, Fajun Xiao, Ming Kang and Malin Premaratne more... Adiabatic and nonadiabatic nanofocusing of plasmons by tapered gap plasmon waveguides D. F. P. Pile and D. K. Gramotnev more... Nanofocusing enhancement in a tapered slit by using a dielectric micro isosceles triangle prism and tuning the entrance aperture Dengfeng Kuang, Sheng Ouyang and Zhongxun Du more... High-performance ultra-broadband absorption–diffusion integrated metasurface Yuzhou Ran, Lihua Shi, Jianbao Wang, Yao Ma, Jie Li and Yicheng Liu more... Polarization-selective optical transmission through a plasmonic metasurface Charles Pelzman and Sang-Yeon Cho more... A broadband transformation-optics metasurface lens Xiang Wan, Wei Xiang Jiang, Hui Feng Ma and Tie Jun Cui more... Shape effects in tapered metal rods during adiabatic nanofocusing of plasmons Michael W. Vogel and Dmitri K. Gramotnev more... A multi-band spoof surface plasmon polariton coupling metasurface based on dispersion engineering Guoxiang Dong, Hongyu Shi, Wei Li, Yuchen He, Anxue Zhang, Zhuo Xu, Xiaoyong Wei and Song Xia more... Bidirectional multi-mode microwave vortex beam generation enabled by spoof surface plasmon polaritons Hao Feng, Longfang Ye, Yong Zhang, Weiwen Li, Huanyang Chen and Qing Huo Liu more... Optical trapping using all silicon nanoantennas with ultra-high electric field enhancement Wei Zhan, Kui Gao, Chenjun Zhu and Wuzhou Song more... Flat photonics for broadband light-trapping Hao Luo, Jingyi Tian, Qiang Li, Binze Ma, Yining Zhu, Jianbo Yu, Yu Hong, Ao Ouyang, Pavel Belov, Ravindra K Sinha, Sandeep Kaur and Min Qiu more... Launcher of high-order Bessel vortex beam carrying orbital angular momentum by designing anisotropic holographic metasurface Xiangshuai Meng, Xiaoming Chen, Lin Yang, Wei Xue, Anxue Zhang, Wei E. I. Sha and Qiang Cheng more... Open Submitted: 20 August 2020 Accepted: 30 November 2020 Published Online: 14 December 2020 * LIGHT ABSORPTION AND NANOFOCUSING ON A TAPERED MAGNETIC METASURFACE * Appl. Phys. Lett. 117, 243102 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0026073 Dong Wei1,2, Chai Hu1,2,3, Mingce Chen1,2, Jiashuo Shi1,2, Jun Luo1,2, Haiwei Wang4, Changsheng Xie4,a), and Xinyu Zhang1,2,a) more...View Affiliations * 1National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Multispectral Information Processing, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China * 2School of Artificial Intelligence and Automation, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China * 3Innovation Institute, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China * 4Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China * a)Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed: cs_xie@mail.hust.edu.cn and x_yzhang@hust.edu.cn Note: This Paper is part of the APL Special Collection on Metastructures: From Physics to Applications. View Contributors * Dong Wei * Chai Hu * Mingce Chen * Jiashuo Shi * Jun Luo * Haiwei Wang * Changsheng Xie * Xinyu Zhang * PDF * CHORUS * Abstract * Full Text * Figures * Cited by * Tools * Download Citation * Add to Favorites * Reprints and Permissions * E-mail Facebook Linkedin Twitter Reddit Mendeley Recommend to Librarian * Share E-mail Facebook Linkedin Twitter Reddit Mendeley Recommend to Librarian metrics 1.3K Views * Topics * Special Topics * Metastructures: From Physics to Application * Topics * Thin films * Wave propagation * Magnetic devices * Reflectivity spectra * Surface plasmon polaritons * Nanolithography * Reflection spectroscopy * Metamaterials ABSTRACT A type of metasurface was constructed on a silicon wafer using a nanopatterned magnetic film to achieve ideal light absorption within a wide wavelength range of 3 μm–15 μm. Using the metasurface, the surface electrons could be localized efficiently into an arrayed planar magnetic nanotip and then modulated by configuring the surface architecture to produce remarkable infrared reflectivity variation. A theoretical analysis showed that the excited surface plasmon exhibit stronger electric field components at the common metal-to-air interface. The Tb14Fe68Co18 nanotip array provided more powerful nanofocusing and a lower infrared reflectivity than an array shaped on a traditional aluminum film. By adjusting the structural parameters of the nanorhombus array formed on the TbCo film system, the convergent light spot could be modulated to improve light absorption markedly. Surface plasmons, which are surface resonance electromagnetic wavefields, are closely coupled with surface electron density waves. The latter are stimulated by incident light waves that fall over a nanostructured interface. This relationship provides a feasible approach to adjusting the incident light reflectivity by establishing a patterned surface conductive electron distribution. This enables the determination of many unique properties, such as subwavelength light focusing characteristics, near-field light resonance enhancement, and surface dielectric sensitivity.1–31. E. Cubukcu, N. Yu, E. J. Smythe, L. Diehl, K. B. Crozier, and F. Capasso, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 14, 1448 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2007.9127472. N. Liu, M. L. Tang, M. Hentschel, H. Giessen, and A. P. Alivisatos, Nat. Mater. 10, 631 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat30293. D. K. Gramotnev and S. I. Bozhevolnyi, Nat. Photonics 8, 14 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/NPHOTON.2013.232 The plasmonic effect has been applied to fields such as super-high resolution imaging, optical absorbers, photothermal effect applications, and spectral filtering,4–64. C. Wu, B. Neuner, G. Shvets, J. John, A. Milder, B. Zollars, and S. Savoy, Phys. Rev. B 84, 075102 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.0751025. F. Yi, H. Zhu, J. C. Reed, and E. Cubukcu, Nano Lett. 13, 1638 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl400087b6. R. Bardhan, S. Lal, A. Joshi, and N. J. Halas, Acc. Chem. Res. 44, 936 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/ar200023x as well as polarization control and phase manipulation.7–97. N. Yu and F. Capasso, Nat. Mater. 13, 139 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat38398. D. Franklin, Y. Chen, A. Vazquez-Guardado, S. Modak, J. Boroumand, D. Xu, S.-T. Wu, and D. Chanda, Nat. Commun. 6, 7337 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms83379. H. Cheng, S. Q. Chen, P. Yu, X. Y. Duan, B. Y. Xie, and J. G. Tian, Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 203112 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4831776 Quite recently, magnetic resonance modes excited on the metasurface have also been studied. For example, magnetic modes excited on colloidally synthesized sliver nanocubes situated over a gold film,1010. G. M. Akselrod, J. Huang, T. B. Hoang, P. T. Bowen, L. Su, D. R. Smith, and M. H. Mikkelsen, Adv. Mater. 27, 8028 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201503281 as well as a patterned silicon metasurface has been shown to enhance the absorption greatly.1111. P. D. Terekhov, K. V. Baryshnikova, Y. Greenberg, Y. H. Fu, A. B. Evlyukhin, A. S. Shalin, and A. Karabchevsky, Sci. Rep. 9, 3438 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40226-0 In fact, it has also been shown that the magnetic mode excited in the metal/insulation/metal metasurface can control the thermal emission of photons.1212. X. Zhang, H. Lou, Z. G. Zhang, Q. Wang, and S. N. Zhu, Sci. Rep. 7, 41858 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41858 Research on the generation of desired micro-nano-light fields using the plasmonic effect that has been observed over magnetic materials remains limited. In this paper, we report a study of surface plasmons excited over magnetic film surfaces. Enhanced incident light absorption and near-field light nanofocusing efficiencies are also presented. Theoretical derivations indicate that the wave vector of a surface resonance wave is larger and the electric field component is much stronger over a magnetic-to-dielectric interface than over a common metal–dielectric interface. This leads to more powerful light focusing with a subwavelength focus and a stronger light absorption. Two different magnetic films, namely, Tb14Fe68Co18 and TbCo, are studied carefully for efficient control of infrared reflectivity and near-field light nanofocusing. Nanotips are fabricated over both the Tb14Fe68Co18 film and a common aluminum film. Upon comparing the optical properties of the patterned Tb14Fe68Co18 film with those of the patterned aluminum film, it is found that the infrared reflectivity of the nanopatterned magnetic film is lower than that of the original metallic material. In addition, the near-field light can be focused more efficiently using nanostructured arrays. This results in an improved nanofocusing ability. The relationships between the optical properties of the structural parameters were studied using nanopatterned TbCo films. Fabricating a nanorhombus array over a TbCo film decreased the infrared reflectivity markedly relative to an un-patterned film. Varying the nanorhombus structural parameters lead to clear changes in the size and intensity of the near-field light spot formed. Since the relative magnetic permeability of the magnetic media is not equal to one, a relatively strong magnetic response represented by the magnetization M is expected. The propagation constant β, the wave-vector k2, and the electric field component perpendicular to the magnetic-to-dielectric interface can be calculated via Maxwell's equations 𝐻𝑦(𝑧)=𝐴2𝑒𝑖𝛽𝑥𝑒−𝑘2𝑧,Hyz=A2eiβxe−k2z, (1) 𝐸𝑥(𝑧)=𝑖𝐴21𝜔𝜀0𝜀2𝑘2𝑒𝑖𝛽𝑥𝑒−𝑘2𝑧,Exz=iA21ωε0ε2k2eiβxe−k2z, (2) 𝐸𝑧(𝑧)=−𝐴2𝛽𝜔𝜀0𝜀2𝑒𝑖𝛽𝑥𝑒−𝑘2𝑧,Ezz=−A2βωε0ε2eiβxe−k2z, (3) 𝛽=𝑘0𝜀1𝜀2𝜀1+𝜀2𝜀1𝜇2−𝜀2𝜇1𝜀1−𝜀2⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯√,β=k0ε1ε2ε1+ε2ε1μ2−ε2μ1ε1−ε2, (4) 𝑘22=−𝑘20𝜀22𝜀1+𝜀2𝜀1𝜇1−𝜀2𝜇2𝜀1−𝜀2.k22=−k02ε22ε1+ε2ε1μ1−ε2μ2ε1−ε2. (5) In a nonmagnetic medium, these components can be represented at the metal-to-dielectric interface using 𝛽=𝑘0𝜀1𝜀2𝜀1+𝜀2⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯√,β=k0ε1ε2ε1+ε2, (6) 𝑘22=−𝑘20𝜀22𝜀1+𝜀2.k22=−k02ε22ε1+ε2. (7) The propagation constant β is 𝜀1𝜇2−𝜀2𝜇1𝜀1−𝜀2⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯√ε1μ2−ε2μ1ε1−ε2 larger than when nonmagnetic media are used. The component of the wave-vector k2 in the propagation direction is 𝜀1𝜇1−𝜀2𝜇2𝜀1−𝜀2⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯√ε1μ1−ε2μ2ε1−ε2 larger than in the case of nonmagnetic media. Since both parameters 𝜀1𝜇1−𝜀2𝜇2𝜀1−𝜀2⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯√ε1μ1−ε2μ2ε1−ε2 and 𝜀1𝜇2−𝜀2𝜇1𝜀1−𝜀2⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯√ε1μ2−ε2μ1ε1−ε2 are larger than one, the wave-vector is larger in magnetic media. In other words, the surface plasmon polariton (SSP) wavelength is smaller. Because the electric field component Ex is proportional to k2 and Ez is proportional to β, a stronger localized near-field light can be produced. A shorter surface resonance wavelength should lead to a smaller focused spot. A stronger electric-field component should indicate that the incident infrared waves are already confined to a near-field space over the magnetic-to-dielectric interface and therefore that light absorption by the nanostructured magnetic film should be higher. Tapered structures are commonly utilized for nanofocusing.3,13,143. D. K. Gramotnev and S. I. Bozhevolnyi, Nat. Photonics 8, 14 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/NPHOTON.2013.23213. D. Wei, Z. Xin, M. Chen, C. Hu, X. Zhang, H. Wang, and C. Xie, AIP Adv. 9, 065103 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.509346914. D. Wei, C. Hu, M. Chen, J. Shi, J. Luo, X. Zhang, H. Wang, and C. Xie, Opt. Mater. Express 10, 105 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/OME.382116 Surface waves excited on tapered structures gradually concentrate the incident energy and localize the light field, thus enhancing the amplitude along the propagation direction. In this paper, tapered structures including nanotip and nanorhombus arrays are used to study the SPP excited on a magnetic metasurface in order to achieve perfect absorption and nanofocusing. Similar planar nanotip arrays were defined on aluminum and Tb14Fe68Co18 film surfaces. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images and sample fabrication processes are shown in Fig. 1. Typical nanotip metasurface morphologies on aluminum and Tb14Fe68Co18 films, respectively, are illustrated in Figs. 1(a) and 1(c). The aluminum nanotip array exhibited a clear structural edge that indicates high etch and transfer precision. However, the Tb14Fe68Co18 nanotip film provided a relatively poor processing result. The nanostructured aluminum film was fabricated via electron beam lithography (EBL, Vistec EBPG 5000plus ES) and inductively coupled plasma (ICP, plasmonic APX300/E600) etching, as illustrated in Fig. 1(b). The nanostructured Tb14Fe68Co18 film was fabricated using a typical liftoff process, as illustrated in Fig. 1(d). The magnetic medium utilized was a multilayer film system made from Si3N4 (60 nm)/Tb14Fe68Co18 (20 nm)/Si3N4 (5 nm)/AlTi (10 nm). The multilayer Tb14Fe68Co18 film was deposited via magnetron sputtering (JS550 ∼ S/3). Because sputtering requires heating and the photoresist does not usually survive high temperatures, silica was used as a liftoff material. Since many reactants remained on the nanostructured Tb14Fe68Co18 film during the liftoff process, the processing efficiency was relatively poor. FIG. 1. Planar nanotip arrays fabricated over both the Tb14Fe68Co18 film and an aluminum film. (a) Scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of an aluminum nanotip metasurface. (b) The fabrication process used to shape a planar nanotip array on an aluminum film. (c) SEM image of a magnetic nanotip metasurface. (d) The fabrication process used to shape a nanotip array on the Tb14Fe68Co18 magnetic metasurface. (e) Nanotip metasurface light reflectivities at infrared wavelengths of 3 μm–15 μm. * PPT | * High resolution The light reflectivities of the fabricated nanotip metasurfaces were measured via Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR, VERTEX 70) and the results are shown in Fig. 1(e). All of the collected data were normalized using silver-coated plano mirrors (Thorlabs PFSQ10-03-P01), which present high infrared reflectance characteristics (>96% for 3 μm to 15 μm). The Tb14Fe68Co18 nanotip metasurface exhibits less light reflectivity than the aluminum nanotip metasurface. Generally, the reflectivity of the aluminum nanotip metasurface is between ∼30% and ∼40% in the 3 μm–15 μm wavelength region, but the reflectivity of the Tb14Fe68Co18 nanotip metasurface is less than 30%. A lower reflectivity indicates a higher light absorptivity. At an initial wavelength of 3 μm, the reflectivities of both nanotip metasurfaces are similar. When the wavelength increases, the reflectivity of the Tb14Fe68Co18 nanotip metasurface is lower than that of the aluminum metasurface and the gap between the metasurfaces increases gradually. At a wavelength of ∼15 μm, there is a maximum gap of more than 10%. When the Tb14Fe68Co18 nanotip array is compared to a nanotip aluminum film, obvious magnetic loss is noted. This indicates direct absorption of light energy that is incident upon the Tb14Fe68Co18 nanotip array. Stable near-field light distributions acquired using the aluminum and Tb14Fe68Co18 nanotip metasurfaces were measured via scanning near-field optical microscopy (SNOM, Neaspec GmbH Co.), as shown in Fig. 2. The incident directions and polarization collocation of the incident lasers used to measure the near-field optical characteristics are shown in Fig. 2(a). A spherical coordinate system is used to describe the incident directions of the beams used in SNOM testing. Both θ and φ are set to 45° and the incident beams are p-polarized. The beam incidence is labeled using a round, red arrow and the polarization is indicated using a square, red arrow. The sample is illuminated using a far-infrared beam with a wavelength of 10 μm. A platinum probe is used to detect the electric field signals from the near-field light wave. In magnetic media, the SPP wavelength is shorter and the electric-field component Ez is larger. As shown in Figs. 2(b) and 2(c), the maximum of the electric field is approximately 6.3 μV over the aluminum nanotip array but approximately 48 μV over the Tb14Fe68Co18 nanotip array. The near-field optical properties characterize the surface charge distribution behavior at the interface. Since the near-field light waves are already perfectly localized on the Tb14Fe68Co18 nanotip array surface, the surface electrons are highly localized into the nanotips. In contrast, what little near-field light is observed over the aluminum nanotip array is constantly interrupted. The shorter wavelength of the SPPs excited on the Tb14Fe68Co18 nanotip array results in more intense focusing. FIG. 2. Typical fabricated nanotip metasurface near-field light distributions. (a) Direction and polarization co-location of incident lasers used to measure near-field optical characteristics. (b) A stable surface light field localized slightly into an aluminum nanotip array. (c) A distinct surface light field localized heavily into a linear Tb14Fe68Co18 nanotip array. * PPT | * High resolution A TbCo nanorhombus metasurface is used to evaluate relationships between optical properties and nanostructural parameters. TbCo is ferromagnetic with two anti-parallel sublattices. Its magnetization can be reversed using the ultrafast thermal effect produced by femtosecond lasers.1515. W. Cheng, X. Li, H. Wang, X. Cheng, and X. Miao, AIP Adv. 7, 056018 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4975659 The typical characteristics of a nanorhombus array-shaped TbCo magnetic film deposited on a silicon substrate are characterized by its periods in the x-(P) and y-(Q) directions and the two major-diagonal lengths (A) and (B) of each single nanorhombus, as shown in Fig. 3(a). A liftoff method is used to fabricate a nanorhombus TbCo metasurface shown in Fig. 3(b). Because the magnetron sputtering used to form the TbCo magnetic film is performed at 300 K, polymethylmethacrylate is used directly as a peeling material. FIG. 3. Schematic diagram of a TbCo metasurface. (a) A nanorhombus metasurface shaped over a magnetic film pre-deposited on the silicon substrate. (b) Typical fabrication processes. (c) Reflectivity spectra of the measured samples, including the TbCo metasurface, magnetic film, and silicon wafer. * PPT | * High resolution The light reflectivity behaviors of various materials including the TbCo metasurface, magnetic film, and silicon wafer, are shown in Fig. 3(c). It can be seen that the TbCo metasurface has a lower reflectivity. The TbCo magnetic film and silicon wafer are highly reflective, but the reflectivity decreases gradually as the wavelength increases. The reflectivity of the TbCo film is almost 100% in the 3 μm–4 μm range but approximately 75% at 15 μm. The reflectivity of the silicon wafer is smaller since it is ∼65% at 3 μm and reaches ∼40% at 15 μm. In contrast, in the 3 μm–15 μm wavelength range, the reflectivity of the TbCo metasurface is approximately 20% and varies little. Here, the filling factor (FF) is defined as the ratio of the TbCo nanostructure area to the total surface area of the silicon wafer. Typically, the total light reflectivity of the TbCo metasurface RMM should equal the sum of the weighted reflectivities of the magnetic film RMF and the silicon wafer RSW. That is, RMM = RMF × FF + RSW × (1 − FF). However, the practical reflectivity is much lower than that given by the above calculation. We believe that the relatively strong light absorption observed must be a result of strong excitation of SPPs over the TbCo metasurface. The TbCo nanorhombus metasurface ensures that a large number of incident beams are already coupled and thus stored in the TbCo nanorhombus array as a highly localized near-field light wave by inducing strong electric and magnetic dipole oscillations in each nanorhombus of the TbCo metasurface. This serves to enhance light absorption in the sample greatly. Ohmic and magnetic losses may serve as additional factors that enhance light absorption markedly. Since the TbCo nanorhombus array is periodic, its light reflectivity is decreased further by effectively coupling adjacent nanorhombuses in order to enhance the light absorption greatly. The light reflection characteristics of TbCo metasurfaces with different structural parameter configurations were obtained. Figures 4(a)–4(d) present four similar TbCo nanorhombus arrays with different nanorhombus sizes. The metasurfaces named array-a, -b, -c, and -d with the structural parameters A, B, P, and Q are 1930 nm, 540 nm, 2090 nm, and 1439 nm; 1976 nm, 782 nm, 2108 nm, and 1445 nm; 1999 nm, 990 nm, 2120 nm, and 1440 nm; and 2066 nm, 1238 nm, 2066 nm, and 1449 nm, respectively. Moreover, the FF parameters that correspond to array-a, -b, -c, and -d are ∼17.3%, ∼25.3%, ∼32.4%, and 42.7%, respectively. Figure 4(e) presents the TbCo metasurface reflectance spectra in the 3 μm–15 μm wavelength range. As shown, all TbCo metasurfaces labeled using different colors exhibit similar variance trends and relatively soft spectral reflectivities that oscillate between ∼20.2% and ∼21.4%. No obvious peak is measured in the infrared wavelength region. Thus, the infrared reflective behaviors of the TbCo metasurfaces are based primarily on a collective, featured nanorhombus surface resonance electromagnetic excitation response to incident infrared radiation. These are arranged in an orderly, dense manner to shape a special metasurface over the TbCo magnetic film system. The light reflectivity decreases gradually as the FF increases. We can predict that the reflectivity decreases by 0.2% for every 10% increase in the FF. FIG. 4. Light reflection characteristics of TbCo metasurfaces with various structural parameter configurations. SEM images of the fabricated nanorhombus arrays with structural parameters A, B, P, and Q: (a) 1930 nm, 540 nm, 2090 nm, and 1439 nm; (b) 1976 nm, 782 nm, 2108 nm, and 1445 nm; (c) 1999 nm, 990 nm, 2120 nm, and 1440 nm; and (d) 2066 nm, 1238 nm, 2066 nm, and 1449 nm. (e) Reflection spectra of the TbCo nanorhombus arrays shown above. * PPT | * High resolution The near-field light distribution characteristics of the TbCo metasurfaces are shown in Fig. 5. The SNOM test conditions are the same as those shown in Fig. 2(a). Each nanorhombus “edge” is marked by a black dotted outline as per each SNOM light-field drawing. In general, the near-field light intensity is low around the outer edge of each nanorhombus, as indicated by the overlapping blue hollow nanorhombuses. During SNOM testing, two approaches to near-field nanofocusing were used: in light energy nanofocusing, one gathers all near-field light waves into each nanorhombus, while in light field nanofocusing, one forms a small, sharp spot of focused light. FIG. 5. Typical near-field light wave distributions over TbCo metasurfaces with various structural parameter configurations. The detailed structural parameters A, B, P, and Q are (a) 1930 nm, 540 nm, 2090 nm, and 1439 nm; (b) 1976 nm, 782 nm, 2108 nm, and 1445 nm; (c) 1999 nm, 990 nm, 2120 nm, and 1440 nm; and (d) 2066 nm, 1238 nm, 2066 nm, and 1449 nm, respectively. (e) The incident beam allocation used in SNOM testing. (f) The relationship between the light spot length and the short diagonal (A) of a single nanorhombus. (g) The relationship between the light spot width and the aforementioned short diagonal. (h) The relationship between the light-spot intensity and the aforementioned short diagonal. * PPT | * High resolution The light energy nanofocusing approach involves collecting as much light energy as possible into each nanorhombus from outside, as indicated by the wide, dark blue box in the inset in Fig. 5(d). The light-field nanofocusing approach involves forming light spots that are as small and sharp as possible. The average light-spot size in each graph is used as the typical light-spot size and the maximum field strength is used as the light-spot intensity. As shown, the average light-spot intensity and size are (∼1.44 μV, ∼420 × 1000 nm2), (∼1.27 μV, ∼370 × 560 nm2), (∼1.49 μV, ∼400 × 820 nm2), and (∼1.66 μV, ∼760 × 1250 nm2) in Figs. 5(a)–5(d), respectively. Consequently, ideal nanofocusing is presented in Fig. 5(b). Figures 5(f) and 5(g) show the relationship between the average light spot size and the short diagonal length of the nanorhombus. When the short diagonal length is greater than or equal to 0.78 μm, the near-field light is focused near the center of each nanorhombus. The average long and short light-spot edge sizes enlarge as the short diagonal length increases. Figure 5(h) shows the relationship between the average light spot intensity and the length of the short diagonal of a single nanorhombus. Variation in the nanostructural parameters can cause substantial changes in near-field optical behavior. When the short diagonal length of a single nanorhombus is greater than or equal to 0.78 μm, the light-spot intensity increases with the short diagonal length. This characterizes the surface free electron distribution of the magnetic film, leading to a highly localized or compressed re-arrangement of the surface free electrons. The infrared reflectivity can be modulated by defining the required surface layout and rationally configuring the structural parameters of the resulting magnetic metasurface. In this study, a nanostructured magnetic metasurface was formed on a silicon wafer to demonstrate ideal near-field light nanofocusing and infrared light absorption in a wide wavelength range of 3 μm–15 μm for advanced solar cells. The magnetic film surface charge distribution could be controlled by finely adjusting the nanostructural parameters. The infrared reflectivity of the shaped magnetic metasurface could then be further modulated. A theoretical analysis showed that the surface plasmon polaritons excited on the magnetic-to-dielectric interface had larger wave vectors and stronger electric field components than those excited on the metal-to-dielectric interface. The fabricated Tb14Fe68Co18 nanotip array exhibited lower infrared reflectivities and more powerful localized nanofocusing abilities than those shaped on common aluminum films. The convergent light spot could be modulated effectively via careful configuration of the TbCo nanorhombus arrays. This research also highlights some potential applications such as super-high resolution image detection, low-cost nanolithography, and ultra-high-density photoinduced magnetic recording. The authors acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 61432007, 61176052, and 61821003) and the China Aerospace Science and Technology Innovation Fund (No. CASC2015). The authors thank Xiaolei Wen from the University of Science and Technology of China for SNOM testing. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. DATA AVAILABILITY The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request. REFERENCES 1. 1. E. Cubukcu, N. Yu, E. J. Smythe, L. Diehl, K. B. Crozier, and F. Capasso, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 14, 1448 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2007.912747, Google ScholarCrossref 2. 2. N. Liu, M. L. Tang, M. Hentschel, H. Giessen, and A. P. Alivisatos, Nat. Mater. 10, 631 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3029, Google ScholarCrossref 3. 3. D. K. Gramotnev and S. I. Bozhevolnyi, Nat. Photonics 8, 14 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/NPHOTON.2013.232, Google ScholarCrossref 4. 4. C. Wu, B. Neuner, G. Shvets, J. John, A. Milder, B. Zollars, and S. Savoy, Phys. Rev. B 84, 075102 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.075102, Google ScholarCrossref 5. 5. F. Yi, H. Zhu, J. C. Reed, and E. Cubukcu, Nano Lett. 13, 1638 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl400087b, Google ScholarCrossref 6. 6. R. Bardhan, S. Lal, A. Joshi, and N. J. Halas, Acc. Chem. Res. 44, 936 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/ar200023x, Google ScholarCrossref 7. 7. N. Yu and F. Capasso, Nat. Mater. 13, 139 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3839, Google ScholarCrossref 8. 8. D. Franklin, Y. Chen, A. Vazquez-Guardado, S. Modak, J. Boroumand, D. Xu, S.-T. Wu, and D. Chanda, Nat. Commun. 6, 7337 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8337, Google ScholarCrossref 9. 9. H. Cheng, S. Q. Chen, P. Yu, X. Y. Duan, B. Y. Xie, and J. G. Tian, Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 203112 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4831776, Google ScholarScitation, ISI 10. 10. G. M. Akselrod, J. Huang, T. B. Hoang, P. T. Bowen, L. Su, D. R. Smith, and M. H. Mikkelsen, Adv. Mater. 27, 8028 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201503281, Google ScholarCrossref 11. 11. P. D. Terekhov, K. V. Baryshnikova, Y. Greenberg, Y. H. Fu, A. B. Evlyukhin, A. S. Shalin, and A. Karabchevsky, Sci. Rep. 9, 3438 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40226-0, Google ScholarCrossref 12. 12. X. Zhang, H. Lou, Z. G. Zhang, Q. Wang, and S. N. Zhu, Sci. Rep. 7, 41858 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41858, Google ScholarCrossref 13. 13. D. Wei, Z. Xin, M. Chen, C. Hu, X. Zhang, H. Wang, and C. Xie, AIP Adv. 9, 065103 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5093469, Google ScholarScitation, ISI 14. 14. D. Wei, C. Hu, M. Chen, J. Shi, J. Luo, X. Zhang, H. Wang, and C. Xie, Opt. Mater. Express 10, 105 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/OME.382116, Google ScholarCrossref 15. 15. W. Cheng, X. Li, H. Wang, X. Cheng, and X. Miao, AIP Adv. 7, 056018 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4975659, Google ScholarScitation, ISI 1. © 2020 Author(s). All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). ARTICLE METRICS Views 1,268 Citations Crossref 1 Web of Science ISI 0 ALTMETRIC Please Note: The number of views represents the full text views from December 2016 to date. Article views prior to December 2016 are not included. RESOURCES * AUTHOR * LIBRARIAN * ADVERTISER GENERAL INFORMATION * ABOUT * CONTACT * HELP * PRIVACY POLICY * TERMS OF USE * FOLLOW AIP PUBLISHING: Website © 2022 AIP Publishing LLC. Article copyright remains as specified within the article. ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789-_~x