www.msn.com Open in urlscan Pro
204.79.197.203  Public Scan

Form analysis
0 forms found in the DOM

Text Content

CHICAGO (AP) — Abortion wasn't technically on the ballot in Ohio's special
election. But the overwhelming defeat of a measure that would have made it
tougher to enshrine abortion rights in the state constitution this fall was the
latest indicator that the issue remains a powerful force at the ballot box.



The election saw record turnout for what's typically a sleepy August election
date and sets up another battle in November, when Ohio will be the only state
this year to have reproductive rights on the ballot. It also gives hope to
Democrats and other abortion rights supporters who say the matter could sway
voters their way again in 2024. That's when it could affect races for president,
Congress and statewide offices, and when places such as the battleground of
Arizona may put abortion questions on their ballots as well.

Democrats described the victory in Ohio, a one-time battleground state that has
shifted markedly to the right, as a “major warning sign” for the GOP.

“Republicans’ deeply unpopular war on women’s rights will cost them district
after district, and we will remind voters of their toxic anti-abortion agenda
every day until November,” said Aidan Johnson, a spokesperson for the Democratic
Congressional Campaign Committee.

The measure voters rejected Tuesday, known as Issue 1, would have required
ballot questions to pass with 60% of the vote rather than a simple majority.
With the count nearly completed, votes against the measure, or No votes,
received 57% compared with 43% in favor, a lead of almost 430,000 votes.

Interest was unusually high, with millions spent on each side and turnout by far
the highest for an August election in Ohio, which in the past have been mainly
limited to local races. Turnout was even higher than the most recent off-year
election in November, when voters in 2017 decided two statewide ballot measures.




Opposition to the measure, which became a kind of proxy for the November
abortion vote, extended even into traditionally Republican areas. In early
returns, support for the measure fell far short of Donald Trump’s performance
during the 2020 election in nearly every county.



The November ballot question will ask voters whether individuals should have the
right to make their own reproductive health care decisions, including
contraception, abortion, fertility treatment and miscarriage care.

Ohio's GOP-led state government in 2019 approved a ban on abortion after cardiac
activity is detected — around six weeks, before many women know they are
pregnant — but the ban was not enforced because of the U.S. Supreme Court ruling
in Roe v. Wade, which granted a federal right to the procedure. When a new
conservative majority on the high court last year overturned the nearly
50-year-old ruling, sending authority over the procedure back to the states,
Ohio's ban briefly went into effect. But a state court put the ban on hold again
while a challenge alleging it violates the state constitution plays out.




During the time the ban was in place, an Indiana doctor came forward to say she
had performed an abortion on a 10-year-old rape victim from Ohio who could not
legally have the procedure in her home state. The account became a national
flashpoint in the debate over abortion rights and underscored the stakes in
Ohio.



Ohio is one of about half of U.S. states where citizens may bypass the
Legislature and put ballot questions directly to voters, making it an option
that supporters of reproductive rights have increasingly turned to since Roe v.
Wade fell. After abortion rights supporters said they hoped to ask voters in
November to enshrine the right in the state constitution, Ohio Republicans put
Issue 1 on Tuesday’s ballot. In addition to raising the threshold to pass a
measure, it would have required signatures to be collected in all 88 counties,
rather than 44.



The 60% threshold was no accident, abortion rights supporters say, and was aimed
directly at defeating the Ohio abortion measure. Since Roe v. Wade was
overturned, six states have had elections regarding reproductive rights. In
every election — including in conservative states like Kansas — voters have
supported abortion rights.



In Kansas, 59% voted to preserve abortion rights protections, while in Michigan
57% favored an amendment that put protections in the state constitution. Last
year, 59% of Ohio voters said abortion should generally be legal, according to
AP VoteCast, a broad survey of the electorate.

Last month, a poll by the Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs
Research found the majority of U.S. adults want abortion to be legal at least
through the initial stages of pregnancy. The poll found that opinions on
abortion remain complex, with most people believing abortion should be allowed
in some circumstances and not in others.

Opponents of the Ohio abortion question ran ads that suggested the measure could
strip parents of their ability to make decisions about their child’s health care
or to even be notified about it. Amy Natoce, spokesperson for the anti-abortion
campaign Protect Women Ohio, called the ballot measure a “dangerous anti-parent
amendment.”



Several legal experts have said there is no language in the amendment supporting
the ads’ claims.

Peter Range, CEO of Ohio Right to Life, said he has been traveling across Ohio
talking to people and “I’ve never seen the grassroots from the pro-life side
more fired up to go and defend and protect the pre-born.”

While the November question pertains strictly to Ohio, access to abortion there
is pivotal to access across the Midwest, said Alison Dreith, director of
strategic partnership for the abortion fund Midwest Access Coalition.

Nine Midwestern states — Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Ohio, Nebraska, Missouri, North
Dakota, South Dakota and Wisconsin — are considered restrictive, very
restrictive or most restrictive of abortion rights by the Guttmacher Institute,
a research and policy organization that supports legal access to abortion.

“Ohio in particular has always been a destination state for the states around
it,” Dreith said. “If we don’t protect abortion access in Ohio, the options just
continue to shrink for people seeking care in the Midwest.”



Sri Thakkilapati, the executive director of the Cleveland-based nonprofit
abortion clinic Preterm, said the effect of the Ohio vote will reverberate
throughout the country.

“When we restrict access in one state, other states have to take up that patient
load,” she said. “That leads to longer wait times, more travel, higher costs for
patients."

Thakkilapati called the energy around abortion rights in last year's midterms
“exciting.” But she said the media attention died down, and people quickly
forgot “how tenuous abortion access is right now.” The special election and
ballot measure in Ohio are “a reminder of what’s at stake," Thakkilapati said.

“Other states are watching how this plays out in Ohio, and it may give
anti-abortion groups in other states another strategy to threaten abortion
rights elsewhere,” she said. “And for the majority who do want abortion access
in their states but are seeing it threatened, the results in November could give
them hope that the democratic process may give them relief.”



Kimberly Inez McGuire, the executive director of Unite for Reproductive and
Gender Equity, which focuses on young people of color under age 30, says the
results of elections involving reproductive rights show that support doesn't
come just from Democrats or in cities and states considered liberal bastions.

“There was this idea that we couldn’t win on abortion in red states and that
idea has really been smashed,” McGuire said. So, too, she said, is the
“mythology” that people in the South and Midwest won't support abortion rights.

“I think 2024 is going to be huge,” she said. “And I think in many ways, Ohio is
a proving ground, an early fight in the lead up to 2024.”

Dreith said that since abortion hasn't been on a major ballot since last year,
the Ohio vote this fall is “a good reminder” for the rest of the country.

“Abortion is always on the ballot — if not literally but figuratively through
the politicians we elect to serve us,” she said. "It’s also a reminder that this
issue isn’t going away.”

___

Associated Press reporter Stephen Ohlemacher contributed from Washington.




Continue reading


Sponsored Content

TRENDING STORIES
 1. Messi scores late to fire Inter Miami into the Leagues Cup
    semifinalsYardbarker
 2. Death toll in Hawaii’s worst-ever wildfires likely to rise furtherThe
    Washington Post
 3. Ukraine’s Zelensky fires all regional military recruiters, alleging
    corruptionCNN
 4. 0812 Today in HistoryThe Associated Press




MORE FOR YOU


Auto Rotation Off

Full screen


1 of 32 Photos in Gallery©(getty images)


YE

Donald Trump's presidency was polarizing to say the least, and while many of his
celebrity supporters jumped ship following the results of the 2020 presidential
election he's still backed by plenty of famous faces.

Celebrities like musician and conservative activist Ted Nugent, whose passionate
rhetoric has struck a chord with many Trump supporters has stuck by 45's side,
just like Kid Rock, whose unapologetic endorsement of Trump has garnered
significant attention in the media. But it's not just rockstars backing the
former president. He has Super Bowl winners, award winning rappers, comedians,
and reality TV stars by his side.

Join us as we explore the intriguing realm of celebrity endorsements and their
role in shaping the political landscape. As the 2024 presidential election draws
closer we'll continue to update these influential personalities and their
alignment with Trump's campaign.

This is a bit of an odd one but it still sort of counts as a celebrity endorsing
the former president. In 2022, Ye (formerly Kanye West) announced that he's once
again throwing his hat into the presidential election ring in 2024, tweeting
that he'd like Trump to be his VP after visiting him at Mar-a-Lago. He wrote:

> First time at Mar-a-Lago. Rain and traffic. Can’t believe I kept President
> Trump waiting. And I had on jeans. What you guys think [Trump’s] response was
> when I asked him to be my running mate in 2024?

It's a kind of support, don't you think?



Sponsored Content

MORE FROM History Daily
Rediscover The Past With Retro Images From The Best Time To Be Alive30 Eerie
Amish Traditions We Can't Believe Exist
Visit History Daily



MORE FOR YOU


 * © 2023 Microsoft

 * Your Privacy Choices
 * Privacy & Cookies
 * Terms of use
 * Advertise


Feedback