www.state.gov
Open in
urlscan Pro
2600:9000:2644:3400:1f:e8cc:9e00:93a1
Public Scan
URL:
https://www.state.gov/reports/2024-investment-climate-statements/ukraine/
Submission: On December 19 via api from US — Scanned from DE
Submission: On December 19 via api from US — Scanned from DE
Form analysis
2 forms found in the DOMName: gs — GET //findit.state.gov/search
<form id="nav__search-form" accept-charset="UTF-8" action="//findit.state.gov/search" method="get" class="nav__search-form" name="gs">
<div class="nav__search-input-wrapper">
<label id="nav__search-query-id" for="nav__search-query">Search:</label>
<input autocomplete="off" class="usagov-search-autocomplete nav__search-input ui-autocomplete-input" id="nav__search-query" name="query" type="search" placeholder="Enter your search term or phrase" aria-labelledby="nav__search-query-id">
<input id="affiliate" name="affiliate" type="hidden" value="dos_stategov">
</div>
<div class="nav__search-cta-wrapper">
<button class="icon-arrow-right link--arrow--right nav__search-cta" type="submit" form="nav__search-form">Search</button>
</div>
</form>
<form>
<h2 class="sz-feedback-question sz-feedback-text-align-center sz-feedback-word-wrap sz-feedback-main-font-style" id="sz-feedback-question-element">What is your overall satisfaction with this site?</h2>
<div class="sz-feedback-validation-presenter sz-feedback-hide-validation" role="alert" aria-atomic="true"></div>
<div class="sz-feedback-rating" aria-labelledby="sz-feedback-question-element" role="radiogroup"><input class="sz-feedback-rating-icon-input sz-feedback-visually-hidden" type="radio" id="sz-feedback-rating-element-0" name="sz-feedback-rating"
value="0" required=""><label class="sz-feedback-rating-icon-label" for="sz-feedback-rating-element-0"><svg focusable="false" aria-hidden="true" class="sz-feedback-rating-icon" viewBox="0 0 19.93 18.85">
<path
d="M10,4.23l1.25,2.91.41.91,1,.09,3.32.33-2.49,2.16-.75.66.25,1,.75,3.15-2.91-1.66L10,13.29l-.83.49L6.31,15.44l.75-3.23.25-1-.83-.58L4.07,8.55,7.22,8.3l1-.08.42-.91L10,4.23M10,0,7.14,6.64,0,7.22l5.4,4.65-1.58,7L10,15.2l6.23,3.65-1.66-7,5.4-4.65-7.14-.74L10,0Z">
</path>
</svg><span class="sz-feedback-rating-icon-label-text sz-feedback-visually-hidden">1 <img draggable="false" role="img" class="emoji" alt="⭐" src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/15.0.3/svg/2b50.svg"></span></label><input
class="sz-feedback-rating-icon-input sz-feedback-visually-hidden" type="radio" id="sz-feedback-rating-element-1" name="sz-feedback-rating" value="1" required=""><label class="sz-feedback-rating-icon-label"
for="sz-feedback-rating-element-1"><svg focusable="false" aria-hidden="true" class="sz-feedback-rating-icon" viewBox="0 0 19.93 18.85">
<path
d="M10,4.23l1.25,2.91.41.91,1,.09,3.32.33-2.49,2.16-.75.66.25,1,.75,3.15-2.91-1.66L10,13.29l-.83.49L6.31,15.44l.75-3.23.25-1-.83-.58L4.07,8.55,7.22,8.3l1-.08.42-.91L10,4.23M10,0,7.14,6.64,0,7.22l5.4,4.65-1.58,7L10,15.2l6.23,3.65-1.66-7,5.4-4.65-7.14-.74L10,0Z">
</path>
</svg><span class="sz-feedback-rating-icon-label-text sz-feedback-visually-hidden">2 <img draggable="false" role="img" class="emoji" alt="⭐" src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/15.0.3/svg/2b50.svg"></span></label><input
class="sz-feedback-rating-icon-input sz-feedback-visually-hidden" type="radio" id="sz-feedback-rating-element-2" name="sz-feedback-rating" value="2" required=""><label class="sz-feedback-rating-icon-label"
for="sz-feedback-rating-element-2"><svg focusable="false" aria-hidden="true" class="sz-feedback-rating-icon" viewBox="0 0 19.93 18.85">
<path
d="M10,4.23l1.25,2.91.41.91,1,.09,3.32.33-2.49,2.16-.75.66.25,1,.75,3.15-2.91-1.66L10,13.29l-.83.49L6.31,15.44l.75-3.23.25-1-.83-.58L4.07,8.55,7.22,8.3l1-.08.42-.91L10,4.23M10,0,7.14,6.64,0,7.22l5.4,4.65-1.58,7L10,15.2l6.23,3.65-1.66-7,5.4-4.65-7.14-.74L10,0Z">
</path>
</svg><span class="sz-feedback-rating-icon-label-text sz-feedback-visually-hidden">3 <img draggable="false" role="img" class="emoji" alt="⭐" src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/15.0.3/svg/2b50.svg"></span></label><input
class="sz-feedback-rating-icon-input sz-feedback-visually-hidden" type="radio" id="sz-feedback-rating-element-3" name="sz-feedback-rating" value="3" required=""><label class="sz-feedback-rating-icon-label"
for="sz-feedback-rating-element-3"><svg focusable="false" aria-hidden="true" class="sz-feedback-rating-icon" viewBox="0 0 19.93 18.85">
<path
d="M10,4.23l1.25,2.91.41.91,1,.09,3.32.33-2.49,2.16-.75.66.25,1,.75,3.15-2.91-1.66L10,13.29l-.83.49L6.31,15.44l.75-3.23.25-1-.83-.58L4.07,8.55,7.22,8.3l1-.08.42-.91L10,4.23M10,0,7.14,6.64,0,7.22l5.4,4.65-1.58,7L10,15.2l6.23,3.65-1.66-7,5.4-4.65-7.14-.74L10,0Z">
</path>
</svg><span class="sz-feedback-rating-icon-label-text sz-feedback-visually-hidden">4 <img draggable="false" role="img" class="emoji" alt="⭐" src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/15.0.3/svg/2b50.svg"></span></label><input
class="sz-feedback-rating-icon-input sz-feedback-visually-hidden" type="radio" id="sz-feedback-rating-element-4" name="sz-feedback-rating" value="4" required=""><label class="sz-feedback-rating-icon-label"
for="sz-feedback-rating-element-4"><svg focusable="false" aria-hidden="true" class="sz-feedback-rating-icon" viewBox="0 0 19.93 18.85">
<path
d="M10,4.23l1.25,2.91.41.91,1,.09,3.32.33-2.49,2.16-.75.66.25,1,.75,3.15-2.91-1.66L10,13.29l-.83.49L6.31,15.44l.75-3.23.25-1-.83-.58L4.07,8.55,7.22,8.3l1-.08.42-.91L10,4.23M10,0,7.14,6.64,0,7.22l5.4,4.65-1.58,7L10,15.2l6.23,3.65-1.66-7,5.4-4.65-7.14-.74L10,0Z">
</path>
</svg><span class="sz-feedback-rating-icon-label-text sz-feedback-visually-hidden">5 <img draggable="false" role="img" class="emoji" alt="⭐" src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/15.0.3/svg/2b50.svg"></span></label></div>
<div class="sz-feedback-validation-presenter sz-feedback-hide-validation" id="sz-feedback-comment-validation" role="alert" aria-atomic="true"></div>
<div><label class="sz-feedback-label-note sz-feedback-visually-hidden" for="sz-feedback-textarea">Have feedback about our website? Note: we can’t address visa or passport issues through this box.</label></div><textarea
class="sz-feedback-textarea sz-feedback-main-font-style ignore" rows="5" placeholder="Have feedback about our website? Note: we can’t address visa or passport issues through this box." maxlength="1000" id="sz-feedback-textarea"></textarea>
<div class="sz-feedback-comment-character-counter sz-feedback-display-none"><span></span><span>/1000</span></div><button
class="sz-feedback-submit-button sz-feedback-text-align-center sz-feedback-word-wrap sz-feedback-main-font-style sz-feedback-border-radius">Submit</button>
</form>
Text Content
Skip to content An official website of the United States Government Here's how you know Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States. Secure .gov websites use HTTPS A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. * Newsroom * Business * Employees * Job Seekers * Students * Travelers * Visas Facebook X Instagram YouTube Flickr GovDelivery * State Department Home * Policy Issues * Back * Policy Issues Anti-Corruption and Transparency Arms Control and Nonproliferation Artificial Intelligence (AI) Climate and Environment Climate Crisis Combating Drugs and Crime Countering Terrorism COVID-19 Response and Recovery Cyber Issues Disarming Disinformation Economic Prosperity and Trade Policy Energy Global Health Global Women’s Issues Holding Russia and Belarus to Account Human Rights and Democracy Human Trafficking The Ocean and Polar Affairs Refugee and Humanitarian Assistance Science, Technology, and Innovation Treaties and International Agreements United with Ukraine * Countries & Areas * Back * Countries & Areas Search for country or area Select an Option Search for country or area AAfghanistanAlbaniaAlgeriaAndorraAngolaAntigua and BarbudaArgentinaArmeniaAustraliaAustriaAzerbaijanBBahamas, TheBahrainBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBeninBhutanBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBotswanaBrazilBruneiBulgariaBurkina FasoBurmaBurundiCCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCentral African RepublicChadChileChinaColombiaComorosCook IslandsCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCyprusCzechiaCôte d’IvoireDDemocratic Republic of the CongoDenmarkDjiboutiDominicaDominican RepublicEEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEquatorial GuineaEritreaEstoniaEswatiniEthiopiaFFijiFinlandFranceGGabonGambia, TheGeorgiaGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuineaGuinea-BissauGuyanaHHaitiHoly SeeHondurasHungaryIIcelandIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJJamaicaJapanJordanKKazakhstanKenyaKiribatiKosovoKuwaitKyrgyzstanLLaosLatviaLebanonLesothoLiberiaLibyaLiechtensteinLithuaniaLuxembourgMMadagascarMalawiMalaysiaMaldivesMaliMaltaMarshall IslandsMauritaniaMauritiusMexicoMicronesiaMoldovaMonacoMongoliaMontenegroMoroccoMozambiqueNNamibiaNauruNepalNetherlandsNew ZealandNicaraguaNigerNigeriaNiueNorth KoreaNorth MacedoniaNorwayOOmanPPakistanPalauPalestinian TerritoriesPanamaPapua New GuineaParaguayPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalQQatarRRepublic of the CongoRomaniaRussiaRwandaSSaint Kitts and NevisSaint LuciaSaint Vincent and the GrenadinesSamoaSan MarinoSao Tome and PrincipeSaudi ArabiaSenegalSerbiaSeychellesSierra LeoneSingaporeSlovakiaSloveniaSolomon IslandsSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth KoreaSouth SudanSpainSri LankaSudanSurinameSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTTaiwanTajikistanTanzaniaThailandTimor-LesteTogoTongaTrinidad and TobagoTunisiaTurkey (Türkiye)TurkmenistanTuvaluUUgandaUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited KingdomUruguayUzbekistanVVanuatuVenezuelaVietnamYYemenZZambiaZimbabwe * Bureaus & Offices * Back * Bureaus & Offices * The Secretary of State * The Secretary of State * The Secretary of State * Bureau of Global Health Security and Diplomacy * Bureau of Intelligence and Research * Bureau of Legislative Affairs * Counselor of the Department * Executive Secretariat * Office of the Chief of Protocol * Office of Civil Rights * Office of Diversity and Inclusion * Office of Global Women’s Issues * Office of the AUKUS Senior Advisor * Office of the Legal Adviser * Office of the Ombuds * Office of the Special Envoy for Critical and Emerging Technology * Office of the U.S. Special Coordinator for the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment * Office of the U.S. Special Presidential Envoy for Climate * Policy Planning Staff * Special Envoy for Iran * Special Presidential Envoy for Hostage Affairs * Special Representative for Syria Engagement * Special Representative for Venezuela * U.S. Security Coordinator for Israel and the Palestinian Authority * Deputy Secretaries of State * Deputy Secretaries of State * Deputy Secretary of State * Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital Policy * Office of the Ambassador-at-Large for Arctic Affairs * Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources * Office of Foreign Assistance * Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization * Arms Control and International Security * Arms Control and International Security * Under Secretary for Arms Control and International Security * Bureau of Arms Control, Deterrence, and Stability * Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation * Bureau of Political-Military Affairs * Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights * Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights * Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights * Bureau of Conflict and Stabilization Operations * Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor * Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs * Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration * Office of Global Criminal Justice * Office of International Religious Freedom * Office of the Special Envoy To Monitor and Combat Antisemitism * Office of the U.S. Special Coordinator for Tibetan Issues * Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons * Economic Growth, Energy, and Environment * Economic Growth, Energy, and Environment * Under Secretary for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment * Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs * Bureau of Energy Resources * Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs * Office of Global Food Security * Office of Global Partnerships * Office of the Chief Economist * Office of the Science and Technology Adviser * Subnational Diplomacy Unit * Management * Management * Under Secretary for Management * Bureau of Administration * Bureau of Budget and Planning * Bureau of the Comptroller and Global Financial Services * Bureau of Consular Affairs * Bureau of Diplomatic Security * Bureau of Diplomatic Technology * Bureau of Global Talent Management * Bureau of Medical Services * Bureau of Overseas Buildings Operations * Director of Diplomatic Reception Rooms * Foreign Service Institute * Office of Foreign Missions * Office of Management Strategy and Solutions * Political Affairs * Political Affairs * Under Secretary for Political Affairs * Bureau of African Affairs * Bureau of Counterterrorism * Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs * Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs * Bureau of International Organization Affairs * Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs * Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs * Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs * Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs * Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs * Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy * Educational and Cultural Affairs * Expo Unit * Global Engagement Center * Global Public Affairs * Office of Global Youth Issues * Policy, Planning, and Resources * U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy * About * Back * About Mission About the U.S. Department of State Joint Strategic Plan Equity Action Plan Foreign Affairs Manual and Handbook Department of State by State Map DipNote Blog Domestic Impact We Are the U.S. Department of State History Previous Administration Archives Foreign Relations of the United States National Museum of American Diplomacy Art in Embassies Administrative Department Reports and Publications Agency Financial Reports Form Finder Organization Chart Plans, Performance, Budget Evidence, Evaluation, and Learning Information Quality Act Open Government Initiative Data Informed Diplomacy Digital Government Strategy Plain Writing Program Partner with State Leadership The Secretary of State Deputy Secretary of State Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources Biographies of Senior Officials Directories Contact Us Telephone Directory U.S. Ambassadors U.S. Embassies and Other Posts Country Offices Directory Key Officers of Foreign Service Posts Diplomats in Residence * Menu * State Department Home * search Search: Search Close HomeReportsBureau of Economic and Business Affairs2024 Investment Climate Statements…Ukraine hide 2024 INVESTMENT CLIMATE STATEMENTS: UKRAINE In this section / EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2. 1. Openness To, and Restrictions Upon, Foreign Investment 1. Policies Toward Foreign Direct Investment 2. Limits on Foreign Control and the Right to Private Ownership and Establishment 3. Other Investment Policy Reviews 4. Business Facilitation 5. Outward Investment 3. 2. Bilateral Investment and Taxation Treaties 4. 3. Legal Regime 1. Transparency of the Regulatory System 2. International Regulatory Considerations 3. Legal System and Judicial Independence 4. Laws and Regulations on Foreign Direct Investment 5. Competition and Anti-Trust Laws 6. Expropriation and Compensation 7. Dispute Settlement 1. Investor-State Dispute Settlement 2. International Commercial Arbitration and Foreign Courts 8. Bankruptcy Regulations 5. 4. Industrial Policies 1. Investment Incentives 2. Foreign Trade Zones/Free Ports/Trade Facilitation 3. Performance and Data Localization Requirements 6. 5. Protection of Property Rights 1. Real Property 2. Intellectual Property Rights 7. 6. Financial Sector 1. Capital Markets and Portfolio Investment 2. Money and Banking System 3. Foreign Exchange and Remittances 1. Foreign Exchange 2. Remittance Policies 4. Sovereign Wealth Funds 8. 7. State-Owned Enterprises 1. Privatization Program 9. 8. Responsible Business Conduct 1. Additional Resources 1. 2. Climate issues 1. 10. 9. Corruption 1. Asset declaration 2. Ownership registries 3. Public procurement 4. Resources to Report Corruption 11. 10. Political and Security Environment 12. 11. Labor Policies and Practices 13. 12. U.S. International Development Finance Corporation (DFC) and Other Investment Insurance Programs 14. 13. Foreign Direct Investment and Foreign Portfolio Investment Statistics VS/LS 15. 14. Contact for More Information EXECUTIVE SUMMARY While Russia’s ongoing full-scale invasion presents clear challenges, existing and new investors continue to make investments in Ukraine. Ukraine offers a large consumer market, a highly educated and cost-competitive work force, and abundant natural resources. The Ukrainian government continues to advance legislation to capitalize on this potential with numerous recently completed or ongoing governance and economic reforms designed to bring Ukraine into compliance with EU standards and improve the business climate. Ukraine’s increasing momentum towards integration with the EU offers potential opportunities for investors seeking to access the EU market. Additionally, Ukraine’s reconstruction is anticipated to attract hundreds of billions of dollars in investment from governments, International Financial Institutions (IFIs), and the private sector, which will create significant opportunities for investors. Many U.S. companies have found success in Ukraine, particularly in the agriculture, consumer goods, and technology sectors. Ukraine is an agricultural powerhouse and one of the world’s largest grain exporters, despite Russia’s efforts to block grain exports. Ukraine has long had a skilled workforce in the IT service and software R&D sectors. The technology sector continues to be a key driver of Ukraine’s economy even amidst Russia’s ongoing aggression. Russia’s occupation of a significant share of Ukrainian territory, fierce fighting on the frontlines, missile and drone attacks on civilians and civilian infrastructure throughout Ukraine, disruption of the workforce due to the invasion, unexploded ordnance contamination, and other ecological consequences of the war pose challenges to new and existing investors. However, most areas of Ukraine are not on the frontlines. Despite ongoing progress, problems with corruption and an unreliable judicial system persist, while Ukraine’s adoption of wartime currency controls has added new complications. Nevertheless, reconstruction and recovery offer significant potential opportunities, particularly for early moving investors with a high risk tolerance. Ukrainian government officials are also eager to engage with potential investors as they look to bolster Ukraine’s economy. Table 1: Key Metrics and Rankings Measure Year Index/Rank Website Address TI Corruption Perceptions Index 2023 104 of 180 https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2023/ Global Innovation Index 2023 55 of 132 https://www.wipo.int/global_innovation_index/en/2023/ U.S. FDI in partner country ($M USD, historical stock positions) 2022 $-131 http://apps.bea.gov/international/factsheet/ World Bank GNI per capita 2022 $4,260 http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GNP.PCAP.CD 1. OPENNESS TO, AND RESTRICTIONS UPON, FOREIGN INVESTMENT POLICIES TOWARD FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT The Government of Ukraine (GoU) actively seeks to attract FDI. In 2014, the GoU established the National Investment Council as a consultative and advisory body under the President and in 2016 the Ukrainian government established an investment promotion office, UkraineInvest https://ukraineinvest.gov.ua/en/ , with a mandate to attract and support FDI. UkraineInvest’s mission is to provide a one-stop shop for investors by helping them find and/or initiate a project and then guiding them through any necessary regulatory processes. UkraineInvest is also the primary point of contact for companies applying for tax and operational benefits under the December 2020 investment incentive law “On State Support of Investment Projects with Significant Investments,” that entered into force on February 13, 2021. A unique electronic platform, “Advantage Ukraine” https://advantageukraine.com/ , was created in 2022 to attract foreign investors to the Ukrainian economy. This GoU investment initiative encompasses more than 500 investment projects and opportunities in 10 economic sectors. The Business Ombudsman Council of Ukraine is as an advisory body under the Cabinet of Ministers that provides a forum for domestic or foreign businesses to file complaints about unjust treatment by government officials and state-owned enterprises. In June 2020, draft law #3607 “On the Establishment of the Business Ombudsman Institution in Ukraine” was registered, which would have significantly expanded the institution’s authorities to investigate complaints. In 2021, the bill was considered by a few Rada committees but did not move forward in 2022-2023 due to the Russia’s full scale invasion and ongoing war. LIMITS ON FOREIGN CONTROL AND THE RIGHT TO PRIVATE OWNERSHIP AND ESTABLISHMENT The regulatory framework for the establishment and operation of businesses in Ukraine by foreign investors is generally similar to that for domestic investors. Registering a foreign investment is governed by the Law “On Foreign Investments Regime” (1996), although according to the Law “On Amendments to Some Legislative Acts of Ukraine Regarding the Removal of Barriers to Attracting Foreign Investments” (2017), registration is not mandatory, and having been replaced by the requirement to submit information to the local authorities for statistical purposes. Foreign investments registered before and after the entry into force of this Law have an equal right to receive benefits and guarantees provided for by the Law of Ukraine “On Foreign Investments Regime.” These guarantees include the transfer of profits and income resulting from investment in Ukraine, the right to issuance of a permanent residence permit, a ban on nationalization, etc. Before registering their business, non-Ukrainian citizens must register with the Office of Immigration in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and receive a taxpayer identification number through the State Tax Service. Accreditation (registration and legalization) of branches and representative offices of foreign banks is carried out by the National Bank of Ukraine, registration of representative offices of other foreign economic entities on the territory of Ukraine is carried out by the Ministry of Economy, state registration of separate divisions of foreign non-governmental organizations, representative offices, branches of foreign charitable organizations is carried out by the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine. Foreign and domestic private entities can engage in all forms of remunerative activity, with some exceptions: foreign companies are restricted from owning agricultural land, producing bioethanol, and some publishing activities. In addition, Ukrainian law authorizes the government to set limits on foreign participation in state-owned enterprises, although the definition of “foreign participation” is vague, and the law is rarely enforced. Certain critical infrastructure, especially in the energy sector, is precluded by law from private ownership and therefore not available to foreign investors. This includes the gas transmission system, electricity grids, and various plants and factories. While Ukrainian authorities currently review merger and acquisition investments on competition grounds, the government is actively developing a mechanism for investment screening on national security grounds. Registered with the Parliament in February 2021, draft Law # 5011 “On Foreign Investments in Economic Entities of Strategic Importance for the National Security of Ukraine” was not passed because of Russia’s full-scale invasion. OTHER INVESTMENT POLICY REVIEWS The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and the World Trade Organization (WTO) conducted formal reviews in 2016, which can be found at OECD: http://www.oecd.org/investment/oecd-investment-policy-reviews-ukraine-2016-9789264257368-en.htm ; WTO: https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/tpr_e/tp434_e.htm . On June 7, 2023, the OECD and the Government of Ukraine launched a four-year Country Program that will support Ukraine’s agenda for reform, recovery and reconstruction and will help Ukraine advance its ambitions to join the OECD and the European Union. BUSINESS FACILITATION Ukraine has taken major steps to improve the ease of doing business over the past several years. All U.S. companies surveyed in a report by USAID, American Chamber of Commerce in Ukraine, and the U.S. Department of Commerce released in April 2023: A New Ukraine: Catalyzing Investment in Freedom, Peace, and Prosperity, confirmed that they will continue business in Ukraine post war and 31 percent reported plans to increase investment. Companies mostly invested in Ukraine due to the size of its local market and the available skilled labor force, but increasingly see EU accession as important to their businesses. The report can be found at: https://chamber.ua/news/a-new-ukraine-catalyzing-investment-in-freedom-peace-and-prosperity-usaid-report The European Business Association (EBA) in its analytical report “Gradus Research” indicates that the integral indicator of the Investment Attractiveness Index of Ukraine slightly decreased in 2023 – to 2.44 points out of 5 possible (2.48 points in the second half of 2022). Further research by the EBA showed that despite the war, 32 percent of member-companies’ CEOs believe that it will be profitable for new investors to enter Ukraine (17 percent of respondents thought so a year ago). At the same time, 57 percent of the surveyed companies, which are already present in the Ukrainian market, reported readiness to invest in Ukraine during the war and 79 percent are ready to join the reconstruction process. The report can be found at: https://eba.com.ua/kilkist-seo-yaki-vvazhayut-vygidnymy-investytsiyi-v-ukrayinu-zrosla-majzhe-vdvichi-z-2022-roku/ The government of Ukraine is not a signatory to the WTO Investment Facilitation for Development Agreement. See: https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/invfac_public_e/invfac_e.htm#participation Private entrepreneurs and legal entities can register online via a State Electronic Services Portal “Diia” at https://diia.gov.ua/services/reyestraciya-fop . This e-application has accelerated the digital transformation of Ukraine via an online portal that allows for digital access to 210 government services and enables Ukrainians to receive a range of government services online, including applying for benefits and government programs, paying taxes, accessing important documents, registering and running businesses, and identification and digital signatures. Once a company is registered with the State Registrar (EDR), its data is transferred by the registrar to the relevant state authorities, such as the State Committee of Statistics of Ukraine, the State Pension Fund, State Tax Service, the Employment Insurance Fund, the Social Security Fund, and the Fund for Social Insurance. OUTWARD INVESTMENT By end-year 2022 Ukraine’s investments in foreign countries (equity) totaled approximately $1.68 billion, according to the National Bank of Ukraine (NBU). 2. BILATERAL INVESTMENT AND TAXATION TREATIES Ukraine has signed more than 78 bilateral investment treaties (BIT), of which 65 are in effect. In August 2023, Ukraine terminated its BIT with Russia and the GoU in December 2023 approved a draft law on the termination of the BIT with the Republic of Belarus, however Parliament has not yet adopted the law. The BIT between the United States and Ukraine has been in force since 1996. A list of Ukraine’s bilateral investment treaties can be found at https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/international-investment-agreements/countries/219/ukraine?type=bits . Currently, Ukraine has 72 international bilateral tax treaties (agreements the on avoidance of double taxation), the list of which can be found at https://mof.gov.ua/en/international_agreements_of_ukraine_on_avoidance_double_taxation-543 Two bilateral tax agreements, with Russian Federation and Republic of Belarus, ended on January 1, 2023, and December 20, 2022, accordingly. Ukraine also has 18 free trade agreements (FTAs) covering 48 countries. Three agreements have been announced but not yet finalized. Information on these treaties is available at: http://rtais.wto.org/UI/PublicAllRTAList.aspx . In 2019, an agreement between the United States and Ukraine to facilitate reporting under the U.S. Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) entered into force. On December 1, 2019, Ukraine’s Law “On Ratification of Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty-Related Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (MLI)” came into effect. The MLI law is intended to combat abuse in bilateral tax treaties in a synchronized and efficient way by amending approximately 40 of Ukraine’s bilateral tax treaties. The “Law on Amendments to the Tax Code,” entered partially into force in May 2020 and fully in January 2021. The legislation introduced changes to transfer pricing, tax depreciation and the deduction of certain types of expenses, withholding taxes and international taxation, taxation of permanent establishments, and rent payments for subsoil usage. The law is designed to apply international standards of tax control to all participants in international trade, to implement provisions on base erosion and profit shifting, and to improve tax administration. The Government of Ukraine remains committed to achieving much needed revenue mobilization and adopted the Law on Amendments to the Tax Code No. 8401 in July 2023 to reinstate the pre-war setup for taxpayers who moved from the universal tax regime to the single tax, with effect from August 2023. The Ukrainian government also reintroduced enforcement of the use of cash registers in retail outlets, including restoring liability for violations. With another set of amendments passed on November 8, tax audits were fully reinstated. At the start of the war the CMU introduced deferrals on customs duties that applied to a variety of imported products. In a year in March 2023, the CMU cancelled those deferrals The Tax Code provisions introduced during Martial Law that relaxed the administration of taxes and fees were not extended. For the duration of the IMF program, the Government of Ukraine committed to refrain from introducing tax amnesties or from introducing any tax measures which would jeopardize the tax base. In November 2023, the Parliament adopted the law on taxation of banks’ profits to tax extra profit, which resulted in a temporary tax increase from 18 to 50 percent on the profit of banks, which will generate about 0.3 percent of GDP to help meet Ukraine’s deficit financing needs in 2024. The rate is to be subsequently reduced to 25 percent for profits generated in 2024, which would still be a higher rate than for other economic sectors. 3. LEGAL REGIME TRANSPARENCY OF THE REGULATORY SYSTEM Regulatory regimes in Ukraine are often outdated, contradictory, and burdensome, and feature a high degree of arbitrariness and favoritism in decisions by government officials, weak protection of property rights, and irregular payments. Since 2014, however, the country has been generally moving toward clearer rules and fairer competition. Ukraine’s efforts to implement its EU Association Agreement, including the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA), should continue to help boost overall transparency and legal certainty as Ukraine strives to establish legal and regulatory systems that are consistent with international norms, especially in the light of the European Council’s December 2023 decision to commence negotiations on Ukraine’s accession to the European Union. The formulation of regulations falls solely under the purview of the government. In Ukraine there are no regulatory processes managed by non-governmental organizations or private sector associations. According to the Law “On the Principles of State Regulatory Policy in the Sphere of Economic Activity” (2004), the relevant ministry or regulatory agency is required to publish draft text of proposed regulations on its website for review and comment for at least one month but not more than three months. Along with the draft text, the governmental body must include a data-based assessment justifying the need for the regulation and analyzing its potential impact. The ministry or agency receives comments via its website, at public meetings, and through targeted outreach to stakeholders. The comments received are generally not made public. At the end of the consultation period, the relevant ministry or regulator may publish the results on its website. Often, however, final draft legislative initiatives are not publicly available, or they reappear in dramatically different form. In 2020, the Ministry of Economy successfully launched an electronic platform on technical regulation ( https://techreg.in.ua/ ), on which it publicizes all draft regulatory measures, accepts public comments, and provides responses to comments. Information on draft laws and existing legislation is available on the websites of the Rada (Parliament) and Cabinet of Ministers (rada.gov.ua; kmu.gov.ua). Public finances and debt obligations are transparent. Budget documents and information on debt obligations are widely and easily accessible to the general public, including online. Budget documents provide a mostly full picture of the government’s planned expenditures and revenue streams. Information on debt obligations is publicly available and is published as part of the budget document on the Rada’s website. Information on the status of sovereign and guaranteed debt is published and updated on a monthly basis on the Finance Ministry’s website. Statistics are broken down by type of debt, type of creditor, and type of currency. INTERNATIONAL REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS Ukraine is not a member of the EU, but it is working to approximate many of its standards to meet EU requirements and facilitate access to EU markets, in particular due to Ukraine’s EU membership aspirations. As Ukraine drafts laws, it often incorporates or references EU norms and standards. It also actively solicits and generally follows technical advice from the EU and the Venice Commission. Ukraine is a member of the WTO and a signatory to the WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement. The Ministry of Economy (MoE) is responsible for notifying all draft technical regulations to the WTO Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade. Despite occasional delays in submitting draft legislation to the WTO, Ukraine’s notification of draft texts to the WTO for comment has improved in the past few years. LEGAL SYSTEM AND JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE The legal system in Ukraine is based on a civil system of codified laws passed by its parliamentary body, the Rada. Contracts related to foreign investments fall within the jurisdiction of a system of specialized commercial courts. Generally, the Foreign Investment Law provides that a dispute between a foreign investor and the state of Ukraine must be settled in Ukrainian courts, unless otherwise provided for by international treaties. Ukraine’s judicial system comprises three court systems: 1) civil and criminal; 2) commercial; and 3) administrative. Each system has three levels: local courts; appellate courts; and the Supreme Court, which tries all cases except those involving corruption, which are tried by the High Anti-Corruption Court. Civil and criminal courts are referred to as “general jurisdiction” courts, while commercial and administrative courts are “specialized” courts. Commercial and contract law in Ukraine is codified in the Commercial Code and Civil Code. Local commercial courts exercise jurisdiction over commercial and corporate disputes, while local administrative courts administer justice in legal disputes connected with state government and municipalities, with the exception of military disputes. Regulations and enforcement actions are subject to appeal with no exceptions within terms prescribed in procedural codes and are adjudicated in the national (general) court system. The judicial system is independent of the executive branch; however, extensive corruption in the court system provides an opening for outside influence. Challenges within the Ukrainian judicial system include a lack of capacity and resources, low salaries, as well as the existence of executive and prosecutorial influence on judges. The selection process for the High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) was completed in June 2023 and the HQCJ began filling over 2,500 judicial vacancies. By the decision of the HQCJ No. 95/zp-23 of September 14, 2023, a competition was announced to fill 560 vacant positions of judges in local courts. Before the full-scale invasion, in surveys of their members, two major business associations identified the lack of effectiveness and integrity in Ukraine’s judicial system as the top impediment to greater investment in the country. LAWS AND REGULATIONS ON FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT The Law on Investment Activity (1991) established the general principles for investment and was subsequently followed by additional legislative acts to facilitate foreign investment. The most recent is the Law “On State Support of Investment Projects with Significant Investments” (2021) and subsequent amending legislation granting further tax and customs benefits for major investors. Due in part to conflicts in the body of laws that govern investment and commercial activity in Ukraine, and persistent issues with corruption, foreign investors have found it difficult to pursue cases in Ukrainian courts and often seek arbitration outside of the country. The website of Ukraine’s Investment Promotion Office (https://ukraineinvest.gov.ua/) provides relevant laws, rules, procedures, and reporting requirements for potential investors. COMPETITION AND ANTI-TRUST LAWS The Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine (AMCU) is the Ukrainian state authority responsible for the regulation of economic competition. The AMCU is an independent state body with special status under the President of Ukraine and is accountable to the Parliament. The AMCU’s functions include investigating and prosecuting anti-competitive conduct, reviewing and authorizing mergers and acquisitions, considering appeals of potential violations of public procurement, monitoring the state aid system, conducting competition advocacy within the government, formulating competition policy, and increasing international cooperation and coordination of competition policy and enforcement. In August 2023, Parliament passed the first competition reform Law No. 5431 which enacted amendments to strengthen the legal framework of the AMCU and enable it to more effectively promote market competition and combat monopolistic practices. The Law entered into force in 2024. Ukrainian lawmakers plan to continue efforts to improve the legal framework for the AMCU, which will strengthen its institutional capacity and independence and also enhance its enforcement powers. EXPROPRIATION AND COMPENSATION Current legislation permits legal expropriation of property in certain criminal proceedings or in cases of failure to fulfill investment obligations during privatization procedures. Additionally, the Law “On Legal Regime of Martial Law” (2015) and the Law “On Confiscation of Property During Legal Regime of Martial Law” (2013) allow voluntary or forced expropriations for military purposes with compensation to be provided either immediately or following cancellation of the “special regime/martial law.” On March 3, 2022, the Rada adopted law #2116-IX on expropriation of Russian property in Ukraine. On March 7 it entered into force. The law defines the principles for the forced seizure in Ukraine of objects of property rights of the Russian Federation and its residents, the grounds and procedure for the forced seizure of objects of property rights, as well as the legal regime of objects forcibly seized in Ukraine. No compensation is provided in the case of Russian property in Ukraine. The Rada later adopted changes to the law on the seizure of assets from Russian residents, also allowing property seizures from Ukrainian collaborators without any compensation and without unfairly expropriating bona fide minority shareholders who happened to own shares in the same companies. On May 12, 2022, the Rada adopted law # 2249-IX “On Approving the President of Ukraine’s Decree “About the Decision of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine of May 11, 2022 “On Forcible Expropriation of Objects of Property Rights of the Russian Federation and Its Residents in Ukraine” that allowed for the nationalization of Russian assets in Ukraine. The law did not clearly define who would identify Russian assets. Nevertheless, by the end of 2022 the Cabinet of Ministers compiled a list, which included more than 900 objects that belong directly to Russia as a state. The forced alienation of these objects is to take place according to a special procedure. In July 2023, “Sense Bank”, which previously belonged to sanctioned Russian oligarchs Mikhail Fridman, Piotr Aven, and Andriy Kosogov was nationalized. On July 23, 2023, Ukraine’s Deposit Guarantee Fund appointed the Supervisory Board and Board of Directors of “Sense Bank” based on the proposals of the Ministry of Finance in agreement with the NBU. On July 24, “Sense Bank” announced the new board and supervisory board had commenced work. In November 2022, the corporate rights of Ukrnafta, Ukrtatnafta, Motor Sich, AvtoKrAZ, and Zaporizhzhiatransformator (ZTR) were seized “for the needs of the state” and transferred to the Ministry of Defense. The companies previously had been under the control of oligarchs, some of whom were accused of criminal activity, support for Russia, or both. The seizures were made under the “Law on the Transfer, Forced Alienation, or Seizure of Property under Martial Law or State of Emergency,” which obligates the state to return the seized assets to the owners or give them fair compensation. Ukrainian authorities emphasized that Ukraine needs these companies operating at full capacity to support the critical defense and energy sectors and this was a seizure of assets during martial law rather than a nationalization, and that, following the end of martial law, assets would either be returned to their owners or appropriate compensation paid. DISPUTE SETTLEMENT Ukraine is a Party to both the International Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (ICSID) and the New York Convention of 1958 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. On October 20, 2015, the Government of Ukraine submitted a formal UN communication, noting that Ukraine’s ability to implement its obligations under the New York Convention in the occupied territories of Crimea, Donetsk, and Luhansk is limited and not guaranteed until Ukraine regains effective control from the Russian Federation. The full text of the communication is available at: C.N.597.2015.TREATIES-XXII.1 of 20 October 2015 . The procedure for recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Ukraine is regulated by the following legislative acts: * The Law on International Commercial Arbitration (ICAL, 1994). ICAL is almost a literal translation of the UNCITRAL Model Law. * The Code of Civil Procedure of Ukraine (CPC, 2004). Pursuant to Article 390 of the CPC, Ukrainian courts shall enforce foreign court decisions provided that: recognition and enforcement are stipulated under an international treaty ratified by the Rada; or on the basis of the reciprocity principle under an ad hoc agreement with a foreign country, whose court decision shall be enforced in Ukraine. INVESTOR-STATE DISPUTE SETTLEMENT Many of Ukraine’s bilateral investment treaties recognize binding international arbitration of investment disputes. Claims under the Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) between the United States and Ukraine by American investors are rare. The Embassy only tracks disputes at the request of U.S. businesses or individuals involved in the case and cannot provide a comprehensive number of all investment disputes involving U.S. or other foreign investors in Ukraine. Such disputes in the past were a significant problem; however, in recent years the number of disputes decreased substantially. The Embassy is unaware of any cases pending in the International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes in Washington, DC. In the last such case, the ICSID Tribunal issued a procedural order taking note of the discontinuance of the proceeding in January 2022. ICAL limits the jurisdiction of international arbitration tribunals to civil law disputes arising from international economic operations (provided that the commercial enterprise of at least one party exists outside of Ukraine), disputes between international organizations and enterprises with foreign investments in Ukraine, and intra-company disputes of these enterprises. ICAL does not address foreign arbitral awards issued against the government. Extrajudicial action against foreign investors in the form of official acts of government (e.g., unwarranted inspections, investigations, fines) and illegitimate acts by private parties (e.g., corporate raiding) occur in Ukraine. The Ukrainian government has made it a stated priority to improve the business environment, end corporate raiding, and attract more foreign investment. In 2019, the Ukrainian Parliament passed legislation aimed to end corporate raidership: the Law “On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine on Property Rights Protection,” and the Law “On Amendments to the Land Code of Ukraine and Other Legislative Acts on Counteracting Raiding.” On July 22, 2023 a Law of Ukraine #3103-IX of May 3, 2023 “On Changes to some Laws of Ukraine on Ensuring the Inviolability of Property Rights” was enacted to ensure compliance with sanction legislation in the field of state registration of rights to immovable property and to guarantee objectivity, reliability and completeness of information about registered rights to real estate. INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION AND FOREIGN COURTS The Law on Arbitration Courts (2004), last amended in November 2021, stipulates that parties can refer most of their commercial or civil law disputes to courts of arbitration, which are non-state bodies. Article 51 stipulates that awards of the aforementioned courts of arbitration are final and Article 57 stipulates that they can be subject to mandatory enforcement via a competent state court. Ukraine’s International Commercial Arbitration Court (ICAC) and the Maritime Arbitration Commission at the Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry are both annexed to the ICAL, which itself is a near-direct translation of the UNCITRAL model law. ICAL distributes the functions of arbitration assistance and supervision between the district courts and the President of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Ukraine for both ad hoc and institutional arbitrations. Local courts are obliged to recognize and enforce foreign arbitral awards under ICAL and the CPC, per Ukraine’s obligations under the ICSID and the New York Convention of 1958. However, the reliability, consistency, and timeliness of implementation are unknown. BANKRUPTCY REGULATIONS In October 2019, a new Code of Bankruptcy Proceedings took effect, replacing the bankruptcy law that had been in force since 1992. The new law strengthened creditors’ rights by allowing them to select their bankruptcy administrator, decide the starting prices of debtor assets at auction, and participate in other asset sales matters. The law also improved the procedures for selling debtors’ assets by introducing online auctions and removed a requirement for asset collection through courts or enforcement services before insolvency proceedings can begin, which eased the debt collection process and reducing legal costs for creditors. The new bankruptcy code also provides additional protection of secured creditors. Bankruptcy is not criminalized in Ukraine. The Criminal Code of Ukraine, however, does criminalize: 1) intentionally making an entity bankrupt and 2) distorting certain financial data to conceal the insolvency of a financial institution. In April 2023, the Ukrainian Parliament adopted amendments to the Bankruptcy Code, with the aims of strengthening the responsibility for untimely appeals to court and initiation of bankruptcy proceedings; resolving the issues of strengthening joint and subsidiary liability; approval of recovery plans; and changing procedures of state property sales. In July 2023, Parliament adopted Law on amendments to the Bankruptcy Code No. 3249-IX, in part of applying the bankruptcy procedures during the war time. The bill, among others, establishes a soft moratorium on commencing bankruptcy cases during the war. In particular, the courts may refuse to open proceedings if a debtor’s failure to fulfill his obligations is caused by military operations or if a debtor’s production facilities are located at the temporary occupied terriories or in war zones. 4. INDUSTRIAL POLICIES INVESTMENT INCENTIVES The GoU has made attracting investment a top priority. As part of this effort, in December 2020, the Rada passed the law “On State Support of Investment Projects with Significant Investments,” which provides new financial and operational incentives to companies that invest at least EUR 20 million in one of a dozen predefined industries. Under this law, the GoU will appoint a manager for qualifying investors who helps them communicate with relevant government authorities and navigate government bureaucracy, permits, and regulations. The companies also receive a number of tax and customs exemptions as well as favorable access to land and necessary infrastructure. UkraineInvest has the lead on helping companies identify potential projects and sign agreements with the GoU. More information is available at: https://ukraineinvest.gov.ua/incentives/investment-projects-with-significant-investments/ . The agreements permit investors to pursue international arbitration for violations of their property rights. To further stimulate the attraction of foreign and domestic investments, on August 9, 2023, Ukraine adopted a Law of Ukraine “On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine Regarding the Implementation of Investment Projects with Significant Investments” that additionally simplified the requirements for investment projects with significant investments and improved state support mechanisms for the implementation of such projects. The law, in particular, amended the Law of Ukraine “On State Support of Investment Projects with Significant Investments in Ukraine” and envisaged: * reducing the requirements for the size of significant investments to 12 million euros from 20 million euros and the number of new jobs created — from 80 to 50 during the investment project’s implementation period, which is expected to expand the number of potential investors; * introduction of a new support mechanism for investors, namely partial compensation for the cost of construction of adjacent infrastructure facilities; compensation for the costs of connection to engineering and transport networks necessary for the implementation of an investment project with significant investment; * introduction of the opportunity for the investor to start the implementation of the project before concluding a special investment contract and make investments for pre-project works (preparation of documentation, purchase of land, etc.) in the amount of 25% of the total cost of significant investment, etc. See: https://me.gov.ua/Documents/Detail?lang=uk-UA&id=b6d0940d-2443-41c4-82ec-86e6d2e56973&title=InvestitsiinaDiialnistVUkrainiZa2022-Rik#_ftn1 On March 15, 2024 the government approved the latest regulatory document that is necessary to launch the state support mechanism for projects with significant investment. It is once again clarified that state support will be available to investors who plan to implement projects worth €12 million or more within a duration of up to five years in such sectors as the processing industry, extraction of minerals for further processing or beneficiation, transport, logistics, scientific activity, health care, waste management, tourism, and electronic communications. So far, USD 75.8 million has been allocated in the state budget to support such large-scale investors that are eligible for compensation in the amount of up to 30 percent of the amount invested in the project. Previous incentives, such as generous depreciation rates for most fixed assets, including property, plant, and equipment for investors, are still in place. Moreover, foreign investors remain exempt from customs duties for any in-kind contribution imported into Ukraine for the company’s charter fund. Some restrictions do apply and import duties must be paid if the enterprise sells, transfers, or otherwise disposes of the property. The government does not have a practice of jointly financing foreign direct investment projects. The issuance of government guarantees is rare and subject to budgetary restrictions. FOREIGN TRADE ZONES/FREE PORTS/TRADE FACILITATION Ukraine does not currently maintain special or free economic zones. PERFORMANCE AND DATA LOCALIZATION REQUIREMENTS An employer may employ a foreign national as long as the employer has obtained a work permit for this person. The Law “On Employment of the Population” sets forth the procedure for issuing work permits to foreigners. Authorities issue work permits on a case-by-case basis, for a particular applicant and a particular position in a company. A work permit is normally issued for the period of employment indicated in the employment contract, but for not more than one year. A work permit can be renewed for the same term, for an unlimited number of times, free of charge. A foreign citizen with a valid work permit who spends more than 90 days within a 180-day period in Ukraine can obtain a temporary residence certificate. As of June 1, 2018, temporary residence certificates are now contactless electronic cards with biometric data. The new permits are generally issued for the term of an individual’s work permit. More information on applying for temporary residence certificate is available at: https://dmsu.gov.ua/poslugi/dokumentuvannya-inozemcziv/oformlennya-posvidki-na-timchasove-prozhivannya.html . There are also no age or nationality restrictions on who can be a manager or company director in the private sector. Citizens of EU countries, the United States, Canada, Japan and some other countries do not require a visa to enter Ukraine for a stay of up to 90 days within a 180-day period. Individuals who are planning to get a temporary residence permit in Ukraine for work purposes must obtain a long-term type D visa. The list of countries and respective visa requirements are available on the website of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine: https://mfa.gov.ua/consul/foreigners/entry-and-stay/visa-ua . There are no reports from foreign investors and their employees of excessively onerous visa requirements inhibiting their mobility. Residence permits to Russian citizens are not being extended after Russia’s full-scale invasion on February 24, 2022. Under Article II, clause 6 of the Bilateral Investment Treaty between the United States and Ukraine, neither Party shall impose performance requirements as a condition of establishment, expansion, or maintenance of investments, which require or enforce commitments to export goods produced, or which specify that goods or services must be purchased locally, or which impose any other similar requirements. On July 14, 2022, amendments to the Law “On Public Procurement” entered into force, establishing local content requirements in public procurement of urban transport, utility equipment, railway transport, aerospace products and energy engineering products by giving preference to domestic producers in government tenders if they can demonstrate at least 10 percent (20 percent in 2024 and 40 percent by 2028) local content. However, following consultations with the U.S. government, and consistent with Ukraine’s WTO commitments, the law exempts from the local content provisions those procurements subject to the WTO Government Procurement Agreement. In February 2024, President Zelensky announced the launch of the “Made in Ukraine” platform. While few details have been released, it is expected to incentivize the purchase of a products or services from Ukrainian manufacturers by offering rebates on a portion of the price. Ukraine has no forced localization policies or requirements for foreign IT providers to turn over any source code or provide backdoors into hardware or software applications. Ukraine’s IT infrastructure and Internet Service Providers are largely unregulated. There are no legal measures preventing or impeding companies from transmitting business-related data outside of Ukraine. In an effort to bring its data storage and protection legislation into compliance with the requirements of the EU–Ukraine Association Agreement and with the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), draft law #8153 “On the Protection of Personal Data” was registered in the Parliament on October 25, 2022. The draft law provides for the processing of personal and sensitive information, as well as other specific types of data, establishes data subject rights and responsibilities for data controllers and operators which pertains to the concept of Privacy by Design and requirements for the security of processing, registration with the relevant supervisory authority, and conducting Data Protection Impact Assessments (‘DPIAs’), among other things. The law would apply to both – the public and private sectors, as well as to the legislative bodies when adopting legal acts regulating the processing and security of personal data. This draft law on personal data protection should be adopted to meet the requirements of both Convention 108 (not yet signed and ratified by Ukraine) and the General Data Protection Regulation. 5. PROTECTION OF PROPERTY RIGHTS REAL PROPERTY Ukraine has a regulatory framework protecting property interests, as well as mortgages and liens. The record system is generally reliable and maintained by the Ministry of Justice. Still, judicial reform is needed to ensure efficient enforcement of property rights. On March 31, 2020, Ukraine’s parliament adopted the Law “On Land Market” lifting the moratorium on the sale of agricultural land, effective July 1, 2021, and establishing new regulations for the land market. The sale of state- and municipality-owned agricultural land remained banned, meaning that in practice, the total initial market of land was limited to the 28 million hectares originally privatized in the 1990s. The law limited the purchase of land by individuals who are citizens of Ukraine until January 1, 2024, to 100 hectares of agricultural land. Beginning January 1, 2024, the second stage of land reform started and the Ukrainian land market opened to legal entities. Companies now can purchase up to 10,000 hectares of land officially. The law establishes that a national referendum will be necessary to determine whether foreigners may purchase agricultural land in the future. Foreign nationals may lease land. Before war, the State Land Cadaster system assessed that 27 percent of Ukraine’s 42.7 million hectares of agricultural land does not have a clear ownership title. The State Service of Ukraine for Geodesy, Cartography and Cadaster (StateGeoCadaster) and the Ministry of Justice are working to identify ownership of this land and reduce the untitled portion. Unoccupied property can become communal property only by court decision following a request from the local body authorized to manage real estate property. The request can only be made a year after the property was registered as unoccupied. Up to 30 percent of Ukrainian territory and up to 10 percent of agricultural land is estimated to be mined due to Russia’s full-scale invasion, complicating potential land use until the land has been assessed and demined. Since June 2012, Ukraine is a party to the 2001 Cape Town Convention on Mobile Equipment (CTC) and the Protocol on Matters Specific to Aircraft Equipment (Aircraft Protocol). Embassy Kyiv has not been approached about any disputes under the CTC. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS Ukraine has a long history of inadequate protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights (IPR). Ukraine has been listed on the Priority Watch List in the U.S Trade Representative’s (USTR’s) Special 301 Report since 2015, due to the use of unlicensed software within the government, internet piracy, and an inadequate system of collective management organizations (CMOs). The Special 301 review of Ukraine was suspended in 2022 and 2023 in consideration of Russia’s “premeditated and unprovoked further invasion” of the country. The 2022 Special 301 Report does note that Ukraine has “engaged meaningfully” with the United States on areas of concern such as its system for collecting and distributing copyright royalties to right holders, the use of unlicensed software by government agencies and implementing better methods of combating widespread copyright infringement. In June 2020, the Parliament of Ukraine adopted the Law of Ukraine No. 703 “On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine Concerning the Establishment of a National Intellectual Property Authority” in force as of 14 October 2020, which introduced a two-tier structure of the state system of legal protection of intellectual property. Since November, 2022, the Ukrainian National Office of Intellectual Property and Innovation (UANIPIO), formerly Ukrpatent, performs the functions of the National Intellectual Property Authority (NIPA) that is responsible for granting rights and coordinating the Ukraine’s IP rights system. The Ministry of Economy is responsible for ensuring the formation and implementation of state policy in the field of intellectual property. The UANIPIO is in charge of reviewing and issuing patents and trademarks, training IP examiners, hearing appeals on patent and trademark claims, and supporting the drafting of IPR policy and regulations. UANIPIO also provides CMOs with methodological assistance and clarifications regarding the implementation of the state policy in the sphere of copyright and related rights protection and monitors their activities. In 2017, the President of Ukraine signed a Decree establishing the High Court of Intellectual Property in Kyiv. The creation of a specialized court aimed to: (1) resolve a range of intellectual property issues that have hindered the development of intellectual property relations and (2) raise the standards of protection of the intellectual property rights in Ukraine. However, as of April 2024, the selection of the judges has not been completed and the court is not operational. To resume the process, the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine is scheduled to decide by June 2024 on next steps for the selection of judges. The Cyber Police Department of the National Police had 831 IT officers, as of January 2023. Its Department for Combating Crimes in the Sphere of Illegal Content and Telecommunications (DCCSICT), that is focused on combatting online piracy, had about 60 officers across Ukraine. In 2023, DCCSICT commenced 34 pre-trial investigations: 17 under Article 176 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (Violation of copyright and related rights) and another 17 under Article 229 of the CCU (Illegal use of a mark for goods and services, brand name, geographical indications). During 2023 the pre-trial investigations have been completed in 30 criminal proceedings and indictments concerning 54 offenders were sent to the court. Russia’s invasion and lack of resources limited the effectiveness of the Cyber Police’s efforts in 2023. The Main Unit of Detectives of the Economic Security Bureau of Ukraine (ESBU) also investigates IPR related crimes as criminal proceedings of private prosecution. In 2023, ESBU launched 106 investigations, out of these 56 criminal proceedings continue, 36 cases resulted in the issues of notifications of suspicion and in 14 cases indictments were filed. In December 2020, the government of Ukraine finalized the selection process for the accreditation of collective management organizations (CMO). CMOs operated in six of eight spheres of musical works defined by the GoU until May 2022, when accreditations for CMOs managing broadcasting and public performance came to the end of the 3-year term stipulated in the law. Due to Russia’s full-scale invasion, GoU suspended re-accreditation and instead amended Law #2415 “On Effective Management of Property Rights in the Sphere of Copyright and (or) the Related Rights” to allow non-accredited CMOs to collect royalties in the sphere of extended collective management (broadcasting and public performance of musical works) if in their catalogues CMOs had rights for respective musical works. The amended law requires the government to re-accredit CMOs within 12 months after the end of martial law. On January 1, 2023, Law #2811 “On Copyright and Related Rights” (“New Copyright Law”) took effect. With this legal update, Ukraine adopted best practices on improving IP copyright protection and protection of related rights, bringing Ukraine closer in line with EU regulations. In particular, the law extended the “notice and takedown” procedure to all copyrights and related rights without exception and envisages liability for camcording and card sharing as well as introduced liability for managing a website that allows website users to find and distribute content within a peer-to-peer network in violation of copyright and related rights. As noted in USTR’s 2020 Notorious Markets Report, the availability of counterfeit goods in both online and large physical marketplaces fell considerably in recent years. This trend continued in 2022 and 2023 due to decreased import of goods from China and other countries. The State Customs Service (SCS) of Ukraine maintains a Customs Register to ensure IPRs protection during the movement of goods across the customs border of Ukraine. As of January 1, 2024, SCS entered 980 IP objects into the Customs Register at the request of rightsholders. These included trademarks, industrial designs, inventions, copyright objects, and geographical indications. In 2023, Customs took 347 decisions on the suspension of customs clearance of goods suspected of infringement of IP rights. This resulted in: 15 protocols on the violation of customs rules (under Article 476 of the Customs Code of Ukraine), 78 cases of the destruction of counterfeit goods (under Article 401 of the Customs Code of Ukraine), 49 cases of the destruction of small batches of counterfeit goods (under Article 401 of the Customs Code of Ukraine). Ukraine is a member of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and is party to the Berne Convention, the Paris Convention, the Patent Cooperation Treaty, the WIPO Copyright Treaty, and the WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty. For additional information about national laws and points of contact at local IP offices, please see WIPO’s country profiles at http://www.wipo.int/directory/en/ . 6. FINANCIAL SECTOR CAPITAL MARKETS AND PORTFOLIO INVESTMENT The Ukrainian government encourages foreign portfolio investment in Ukraine, but Ukraine’s capital and commodity markets remain underdeveloped. Liquidity is limited and investors have few investment options. Government bonds constitute 93 percent of trades in 2023, with trade consolidated (96.6%) on two platforms. A few corporate securities are listed, but the volume of their trades is insignificant. With limited exceptions, only Ukrainian-licensed securities traders may handle securities transactions. The commodity market in Ukraine does not have a transparent regulatory framework. The regulator of Ukraine’s capital market, the National Securities and Stock Market Commission (NSSMC), lacks financial and operational independence and is not a signatory to the Multilateral Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Consultation and Cooperation and the Exchange of Information of the International Organization of Securities Commissions. Ukraine has been a member of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) since 1996. In November 2019, Ukraine adopted the so-called “Split” law to regulate the non-banking financial services sector. The law, which entered into force on July 1, 2020, transitions Ukraine from a sectoral regulatory model to an integrated model and lays the foundation for the full development of consumer rights protections and market conduct regulations in the financial markets. The law dissolved the National Commission for State Regulation of Financial Services Markets and divided its regulatory functions between the NBU and the NSSMC. The NBU now supervises and regulates the insurance market, leasing and factoring companies, credit unions, credit bureaus, pawnshops, and other financial companies, while the National Securities and Stock Market Commission regulates private funds, including pension funds, construction financing, and real estate transactions. For many years, Ukrainian capital markets have struggled due to significant gaps and inconsistencies in the regulatory framework. In June 2020, parliament passed the law “On Amendments to Certain Laws Regarding Facilitating Investments and New Financial Instruments,” aimed at restarting Ukrainian capital markets. The law is intended to bring Ukrainian legislation in line with key provisions of EU laws on capital markets (MiFID II, MiFIR, EMIR, the Settlement Finality Directive, and the Financial Collateral Directive), create a framework for updated capital markets’ infrastructure, and regulate commodity markets and derivatives. Long-standing gaps remain in the powers of the NSSMC relative to international standards. In February 2024, Parliament passed amendments to the NSSMC Law (No. 5865) to enhance the NSSMC’s powers, independence and institutional capacity, and its cross-border and domestic cooperation mandate. The GoU also committed to ensuring that the law considers the mandate of other regulators and to moving swiftly to align with International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) principles to allow Ukraine to become a signatory of IOSCO’s multilateral MoU by end-December 2024 with full implementation of the other provisions of the law by end-December 2025 Credit is largely allocated on market terms and foreign investors are able to get credit on the local market through a variety of credit instruments. MONEY AND BANKING SYSTEM Ukraine’s banking sector has adjusted to working in wartime. Despite the challenges, banks have enjoyed increased inflows of client deposits, both retail and corporate. Moreover, the share of term retail for deposits has increased due to NBU measures, thus mitigating potential risks to bank liquidity. Bank lending has also picked up: retail lending has been on the rise since Q2 2023 and the cumulative increase in the hryvnia retail portfolio since the beginning of the year was a record high 37.2 percent by the end-year 2023. Corporate lending in the hryvnia has been gradually recovering, mostly driven by government support programs like the “5-7-9″ affordable retail loan program. However, lending outside these programs has also picked up. Income from investments in government and National Bank of Ukraine securities as well as from corporate loan portfolios has driven significant interest income. Banks retained their high operational efficiency and kept their provisioning costs at a minimum. Thanks to the above factors, the sector generated higher profits – over UAH 86.5 billion in 2023. The government decided to tax this extra profit with a windfall tax. In November, the Parliament adopted the law on taxation of banks’ profits with a temporary tax increase from 18 to 50 percent on the profit of banks, which will generate about 0.3 percent of GDP to help meet deficit financing needs in 2024. The rate is to be subsequently cut to 25 percent for the profits generated in 2024, which will be higher than for other economic sectors. At the same time, banking sector capital has been increasing, paving the way for the implementation of postponed and new requirements in the sector. The National Bank of Ukraine (NBU) finalized its banking sector resilience assessment. The results were optimistic: only three institutions faced a moderate need for a capital increase. Considering the current state of the sector, the NBU has been restoring previously suspended regulatory requirements and introducing new requirements. In September 2023, the NBU reinstated a number of credit risk assessment requirements and improved approaches for banks to assess the solvency of legal-entity debtors. Banks had to implement these measures by November 2023. Starting in 2024, banks will have to restart updating and submitting their business recovery plans to the NBU. Additionally, non-core assets will be deducted from banks’ capital in full and 100 percent of operational risk will be accounted for in capital adequacy ratios (vs current 50 percent). In 2024, the NBU also plans to introduce a new capital structure, which will account for market risk while assessing capital adequacy. Most banks have sufficient capital to comfortably meet these additional regulatory requirements, even taking into account the imposition of the additional tax on bank profits. The number of operating banks in Ukraine in 2023 decreased to 63 from 67 in 2022, as the NBU liquidated four banks. The share of state-owned banks increased by 3.1 percent over 2023, following the nationalization of Sense Bank, bringing their portion of the sector’s net assets to 53.6 percent. Net assets of solvent banks increased by 25 percent in 2023. Portfolios gained in quality over the year with a diminishing number of defaults. Overall, the share of non-performing loans (NPLs) slightly decreased to 37.4 percent in 2023 from 38.1 percent in 2022. The liabilities of solvent banks exceeded the levels of 2022 by 24.1 percent. Client deposits remain the major source of funding for banks, replacing expensive refinancing loans. By the end of December, their share increased to 91 percent, while the share of NBU refinancing loans shrunk to record low 0.1 percent. Over 2023, the NBU revised downward its key policy rate by 10 percent to 15 percent. Foreign-owned banks may carry out all activities conducted by domestic banks and there are no restrictions on their participation in the banking system, including operating via subsidiaries. A foreign company can open a bank account in Ukraine for the purposes of investment operations; otherwise, it needs to register a representative office in Ukraine. A non-resident private person can open a bank account in Ukraine. A foreign investor may open an account in a bank operating in Ukraine and transfer in funds for further investment or invest directly into the account of a Ukrainian resident company. FOREIGN EXCHANGE AND REMITTANCES FOREIGN EXCHANGE Non-cash and cash foreign currency and investment metals are traded on the Ukrainian FX market. Banks, nonbank institutions, bank customers, and the NBU are FX market participants. The regulator trades on the FX market in order to smooth excessive fluctuations of the market and accumulate international reserves. The NBU calculates the official exchange rate of the hryvnia to foreign currencies and investment metals. In early 2022, the NBU took urgent and decisive measures to stabilize the national economy and safeguard macroeconomic stability. The NBU adopted a resolution “On the Operation of the Banking System Under Martial Law” which imposed temporary restrictions on cross-border currency transactions including capital flow management (CFM) measures and restrictions on bank account withdrawals to help preserve financial stability. Restrictions on the repatriation of proceeds from nonresident government debt redemptions were introduced in April 2023 to contain FX reserve outflows. While the repatriation of interest payments was initially allowed, it was restricted in mid-May 2023 through requiring foreign investors to have a minimum continuous holding period of 90 days before the coupon payment is made. In June 2023, the NBU approved a Strategy for easing FX restrictions, transitioning to greater exchange rate flexibility, and returning to its inflation targeting regime. In line with the FX liberalization roadmap under its Strategy, the NBU has gradually eased FX controls, conditional on economic developments. Given strong reserves and stability in the FX market, and with the goal of supporting economic activity, in recent months, the NBU eased restrictions on lending and factoring as well as the servicing of certain loans. At the same time, it has also adjusted measures as needed, including enhanced enforcement of a settlement period (180 to 90 days) for agricultural exports. Restrictions remain in place concerning transactions involving the movement of capital. Some exceptions include: * a bank’s own operations (except for providing loans to non-residents), though payments under documentary and reserve letters of credit/guarantees/counter-guarantees opened (confirmed and provided) from 24 February 2022 can be made only if they relate to transaction payments which are otherwise permitted (e.g., payments for imports of goods and service); * payments made by or to international financial institutions; * payments secured by a state guarantee; * payments made under a separate permit from the NBU. FX controls including CFM measures are expected to be eased gradually and on a case-by-case basis, consistent with the authorities FX liberalization roadmap under their FX strategy. In October 2023, amid a stable FX market supported by strong official financing the NBU transitioned from the exchange rate peg toward a managed exchange rate flexibility regime, The exchange rate has since remained broadly stable supported by NBU FX sales in a market still dominated by the NBU. The spread between the cash and official exchange rate has averaged in the 3– 5 percent range through the year further narrowing. REMITTANCE POLICIES In 2021, the NBU doubled the limit for some retail foreign currency remittances, including for investment abroad or foreign deposits, to EUR 200,000 ($230,000) per year. As long as they comply with the limit, individuals are permitted to remit foreign currency (or the national currency hryvnia) abroad or to current accounts of corporate nonresidents in Ukraine. The transactions allowed include: investing abroad, depositing funds into one’s own accounts abroad, transferring funds under life insurance agreements, or making loans to nonresidents. In 2020, individuals transferred about EUR 274 million ($315 million) abroad. The NBU aims to completely remove the limit on international investments by individuals, subject to the full adoption and implementation of legislation on tax base erosion and profit shifting. In February 2022, the NBU issued Resolution No. 18 “On the Operation of the Banking System Under Martial Law,” which introduced a moratorium on cross-border foreign currency payments, except for the banks’ own operations, including settlements with international payment systems, purchase of imported goods, payments by or to IFIs, payments ensuring mobilization plans (tasks), medical and transportation costs, payments under special permits by the NBU. and payments to diplomatic representations and consulates of Ukraine abroad. At the same time, NBU also reintroduced some restrictions in October 2022. In particular, it reimposed a ban on the peer-to-peer (P2P) transfers from hryvnia payment cards of Ukrainian banks to cards of foreign banks, except for educational, healthcare, and emergency transportation purposes. Ukrainian companies are prohibited from purchasing foreign currency on the Ukrainian FX market for cross-border payments if they already have funds in the respective foreign currency available for making cross-border payments. SOVEREIGN WEALTH FUNDS Ukraine does not currently operate a sovereign wealth fund. 7. STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES While the government lists 3,256 state-owned enterprises as of January 1, 2024, only about 43 percent of them are functioning and about 28 percent of them are profitable. SOEs in Ukraine are defined as companies in which the state owns at least 50-percent plus one share. Since such enterprises are owned by more than 80 different GOU bodies and agencies, there is a lack of unified management principles which results in the low efficiency among state-owned enterprises and the space for corruption. Before the full-scale invasion, the total assets of Ukraine’s state-owned enterprises were estimated at USD 42.9 billion and their total number of full-time employees was around 715,000. SOEs are active in areas such as energy, machine-building, and infrastructure. Some of the companies have significant environmental problems, legacy legal issues, or have oligarchs as minority owners. There is no common public list of all SOEs in Ukraine and each ministry publishes a list of SOEs under its respective management. Before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the Ministry of Economy (formerly Ministry of Economic Development and Trade) periodically updated information on annual financial reports of significant SOEs (100 of the largest SOEs), which it published on the ministry website. Now, annual financial reports are published by multiple government agencies. Ukraine’s corporate governance reform is a part of its European integration process and the IMF program effort. After eight years, this reform process finally resulted in the passage of a new Corporate Governance Reform law that aligns Ukrainian legislation with OECD standards. Bill #5593-d was passed on February 22 and entered into force on March 8, 2024. The law aims to professionalize the management of Ukraine’s SOEs and boost the efficiency of their operations. Lawmakers expect that the law will help Ukraine implement quality approaches to the corporate governance of state-owned companies, attract additional investments, and boost economic development. The law: * clearly defines the mechanism for selecting members of supervisory boards * defines the procedure for independent assessment of supervisory board performance * empowers supervisory boards to approve strategic, financial, and investment plans and to appoint and dismiss management * enhances the accountability of supervisory boards * regulates dividend payments. The law also takes into account Ukraine’s wartime needs and fulfills several international commitments that will play a key role in maintaining financial support for Ukraine. On February 6, 2023, the Rada passed Draft Law #8067 on the corporatization of the state nuclear power company Energoatom. It established the legal, economic, and organizational foundations to transform Energoatom from a (corporatized) state enterprise to a joint-stock company (JSC) to improve its efficiency and corporate governance. On December 29, 2023, the Cabinet of Ministers approved the long-awaited transformation of Energoatom into a joint-stock company (JSC). Energoatom JSC was registered on January 11, 2024. Energoatom remained 100 percent state-owned, with the Cabinet of Ministers as its ownership entity. At the same time, the shares acquired by the state as a result of converting the company into a JSC are not subject to privatization and it is also prohibited from dividing the state-owned shares. On June 28, 2023, “Ukroboronprom” was officially registered as a joint-stock company “Ukrainian Defense Industry” (UDI). The concept of corporate governance reform and transformation of Ukroboronprom, including a target model and a detailed action plan, was developed in March 2020. In July 2021, the Verkhovna Rada adopted a law #1630-IX on the transformation of Ukroboronprom and on December 9, 2021, the Cabinet of Ministers adopted resolution on the transformation of Ukroboronprom into a joint-stock company. The GoU also approved the transformation of 43 unincorporated enterprises of Ukroboronprom into joint-stock or limited liability companies that are fully controlled by the state. On February 2, 2024, the Cabinet of Ministers adopted an order on the transformation of the State Enterprise “Guaranteed Buyer” into a joint-stock company; 100 percent of its shares will belong to the state and will not be subject to privatization. On 21 February 2023, the National Securities and Stock Market Commission (NSSMC) established a procedure for security issuers to disclose information on their ties with risk-zone countries, namely Russia, Belarus, Iran, and North Korea. The NSSMC’s new Decision mandates that security issuers (which include SOEs and state-owned banks registered as joint-stock companies) should submit this information to the NSSMC by 30 April 2023. The disclosure must include any material information on the company’s engagements with or in Russia and its satellites. Specifically, the disclosure should state whether: * the company’s owners include risk-zone countries’ citizens, residents, or legal entities; * the company’s governing bodies include risk-zone countries’ citizens or residents; * the company has any commercial relations with risk-zone countries’ counterparties, including legal entities controlled by risk-zone countries; * the company has any subsidiaries, branches, representative offices, or other units operating in risk-zone countries; * the company has any joint ventures with risk-zone countries’ citizens, residents, or legal entities; * the company has any equity stakes (shares) in a legal entity domiciled in or controlled by risk-zone countries; and * the company holds any securities other than shares of a legal entity domiciled in or controlled by risk-zone countries. The senior managers of Ukraine’s SOE traditionally report directly to the ministry overseeing the relevant SOE’s area of specification. Ukrainian law specifies that ministries are not permitted to interfere with the daily economic activities of an SOE, but numerous anecdotal reports indicate that ministries and vested interests ignore this restriction. The Cabinet of Ministers has the power to decide on the creation, reorganization, and liquidation of SOEs, and to adopt and enforce SOEs’ charters. It can delegate this authority to the ministry charged with supervising the SOE. The Cabinet of Ministers may also delegate to ministries the permission to create joint ventures with state property and prepare proposals to divide state property between the national and municipal levels. Most SOEs rely on government subsidies to function and cannot directly compete with private firms. Several SOEs capable of making a profit have already been privatized, this means that mainly inefficient firms remain in government hands. The Ukrainian government continues to heavily subsidize state-owned enterprises, especially in the coal mining, rail transportation, gas, and communal heating sectors, and has sometimes paid the outstanding debts of SOEs with sovereign loan guarantees. The ability of SOEs to extend payment deadlines remains nontransparent, especially where SOEs are directed to sell their products at below-market prices. PRIVATIZATION PROGRAM At the beginning of the full-scale war, privatization in Ukraine initially suspended for the period of martial law. Aiming to attract investments, President Zelenskyy announced privatization as a priority of his administration in spring of 2022. The re-launch of privatization efforts was expected to attract investments necessary to sustain Ukraine’s wartime economy and assist with the relocation of businesses to safer regions. Small-scale privatization (objects worth up to USD 6.3 million was unblocked with the adoption of draft law No. 7451 on July 28, 2022, which envisaged a set of simplification measures aimed at simplifying auction sales of state-owned companies and assets, in particular: * unblocking privatization of state-owned enterprises where property is mortgaged, arrested or otherwise encumbered while preserving the creditors’ rights; * transferring all valid licenses and permits to a new business owner after acquiring a privatizated object (i.e. simplifying the post-privatization period), instead of obliging the new owner to obtain these regulatory authorizations as previously required; * introducing the requirement for auction items with a value exceeding USD 6.3 million, to hold large-scale privatization auctions using the Prozzoro procurement system, which is more transparent and competitive than the previous procedure; * switching to online announcements of privatization auctions; * significantly reducing the preparation time for privatization: particularly, reducing the period from the auction announcement date to the signing of a respective sale and ensuring that the purchase agreement with a private investor does not exceed two months; and * introducing the martial law-driven obligation to pay the purchase price in advance (i.e. before signing a sale and purchase agreement) after winning an auction. From January-September 2023, the State Property Fund of Ukraine (SPF) held 303 successful auctions. More than 60 percent of the lots were commercial real estate for opening a shop, office or cafe. The most expensive lot in 2023 was the Hermitage Hotel in Kyiv, which was sold for USD 7.9 million. Distilleries have been a frequent auction item in recent years. From the fall of 2020 to the beginning of 2023, in total 39 electronic auctions were held, generating more than USD 50.5 million for Ukraine’s budget. As a rule, the privatization proceeds target included in the state budget do not coincide with the actual privatization proceeds. Year after year, revenue is significantly lower than expected. Though the first quarter of 2023 brought in over USD 22.8 million, the best result in the last 10 years, the annual plan for 2023 privatization proceeds was not realized. As of December 15, 2023, the SPF raised USD 88.5 million for the state budget, much less than the planned USD 164 million. Therefore, 2023 revenue plan was also not realized, although the percentage of anticipated revenue realized was higher than in 2022, when the revenue expectations were USD 202.2 million but due to the war and the suspension of privatization, only USD 43 million was actually received. In 2024, the SPF plans to privatize about 1,000 objects and sell state property worth about USD 101 million. The minimum proceeds from small-scale privatization are expected to reach USD 25.3 million. The resumption of large-scale privatization (worth over USD 6.3 million) became possible after the adoption of draft law # 820 in late May 2023. The main challenge for realizing these larger-scale privatization efforts is the vulnerability of potentially attractive assets to Russian attacks, which makes it less likely that investors will be interested and that assets will be fairly valued. However, Ukrainian authorities are seeing expand privatization efforts given the burden of state enterprises on public finance and the need to support ongoing military effort. On June 22, 2023, the Law of Ukraine No. 3137-IX “On the Introduction of Amendments to Some Legislative Acts of Ukraine Regarding the Optimization of the State Property Fund of Ukraine, Improvement of State Property Management and Effectiveness of the Sanctions Policy” came into effect, though the provisions of this law related to the management of sanctioned assets only became effective on September 22, 2023. The law grants the State Property Fund the authority to sell large assets both to domestic and foreign investors even during the martial law regime. The law also enhances the centralization of the State Property Fund of Ukraine, extends the powers of the State Property Fund of Ukraine to managing the sanctioned assets and simplifies the appointment of deputy heads of the State Property Fund and directors of state enterprises. The SPFU pledged to launch the first large-scale privatization auctions by the end of 2023 and in September 2023 announced the first 15 objects for large-scale privatization, among which there were objects announced for privatization many times in the past, in particular: * Odesa Portside Plant PJSC – producer of ammonia and carbamide; * United Mining and Chemical Company JSC, specializing in the development of titanium-zircon deposits and the production of rutile, ilmenite and zircon concentrate; * Zaporizhzhya Titanium and Magnesium Plant LLC – producer of high-quality titanium products; * Indar PRJSC – a company with a complete technological cycle of production of genetically engineered insulins from substance to finished dosage forms; and * Centrenergo PJSC – one of the leading power generators within Ukraine. These assets were not sold in 2023 and were included into the list of objects subject to privatization in 2024. The list of large enterprises subject to privatization may be significantly expanded by adding the confiscated Russian assets. The SPF continues to prepare these objects for privatization at auctions, although the prospects for their sale are not clear. For example, the first auction for the sale of sanctioned assets – Investagro – did not take place as planned in August due to a lack of potential buyers. In 2024, Ukraine can expect significant demand for small-scale privatization objects and distilleries that have not yet been sold, but investor interest in large assets seems doubtful in the current environment, which is partly confirmed by the SPF’s constant postponement of the deadlines for putting them up for privatization. More detailed information on the state enterprises and assets subject to large-scale privatization may be found via the SPF’s website: https://www.spfu.gov.ua/en/ ; https://privatization.gov.ua/ . Starting September 22, 2023, the SPF is also empowered to determine the enforcement procedures for the court decisions on the recovery of assets belonging to an individual or a legal entity subject to sanctions. The Property Fund will also manage sanctioned assets and will be entitled to dispose of sanctioned assets belonging to the residents of the states that carry out armed aggression against Ukraine (i.e. the Russian Federation). The rules on privatization apply to foreign and domestic investors and, theoretically, establish a level playing field. However, observers have pointed to numerous instances in past privatizations where vested interests have influenced the process to fit a pre-selected bidder. Despite these concerns, the government has stated that there would be no revisions of past privatizations, but there are ongoing court cases wherein private companies are challenging earlier privatizations. 8. RESPONSIBLE BUSINESS CONDUCT There is limited but growing awareness in Ukraine of internationally accepted standards for responsible business conduct, including corporate social responsibility. Primary drivers for the introduction of these standards have been Ukraine’s vibrant civil society, international companies and investors, and efforts by business associations such as the American Chamber of Commerce and the European Business Association. The government of Ukraine has put in place corporate governance standards to protect shareholders; however, these are voluntary. In 2017, Ukraine became the 47th country to adhere to the OECD Declaration and Decisions on International Investment and Multinational Enterprises , which provides recommendations on responsible business conduct. Ukraine formally established its National Contact Point to promote these guidelines for Multinational Enterprises under the Ministry of Economy back in 2018, but it does not seem operational now. On May 31, 2018, Ukraine adopted and agreed to support and monitor implementation of the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Business Conduct. There are also independent NGOs, such Center for the Development of Corporate Social Responsibility, as well as investment funds, worker organizations and unions, and business associations promoting or monitoring responsible business conduct. There are no reported restrictions on their activities aimed at promoting responsible business conduct. Ukraine has been a member of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) since 2013. Participation by companies in Ukraine, however, remains voluntary. Ukraine has not joined the Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights. ADDITIONAL RESOURCES Department of State * Country Reports on Human Rights Practices; * Trafficking in Persons Report; * Guidance on Implementing the “UN Guiding Principles” for Transactions Linked to Foreign Government End-Users for Products or Services with Surveillance Capabilities * U.S. National Contact Point for the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises; and; * Xinjiang Supply Chain Business Advisory Department of the Treasury * OFAC Recent Actions Department of Labor * Findings on the Worst Forms of Child Labor Report; * List of Goods Produced by Child Labor or Forced Labor; * Sweat & Toil: Child Labor, Forced Labor, and Human Trafficking Around the World and; * Comply Chain. CLIMATE ISSUES Before Russia’s full-scale invasion in February 2022, Ukraine made important steps to build the environmental regulatory framework and ramp up efforts on national efforts on climate change mitigation. Ukraine updated its nationally determined contribution (NDC) in July 2021, including a commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 65 percent by 2030 compared to 1990. The beginning of the full-scale war in 2022, however, rendered most of Ukraine’s previous NDC implementation plans irrelevant. As a result, the concept for the implementation of state policy in the field of climate change up to 2030, accompanied by an action plan, for now remains outdated and does not reflect the new targets stemming from the updated NDC. The commitment to reach net-zero emissions by 2060, which is included in the updated NDC, has not translated into a long-term low-emission development strategy yet. A national adaptation strategy was adopted in 2021 as well as an operational plan for its implementation covering 2022-2024. Ukraine continues to work on a framework climate law to make climate commitments legally binding and to establish a robust climate governance architecture. A Contracting Party to the Energy Community, Ukraine has several obligations connected to the Decarbonization Roadmap. Ukraine is developing its National Energy and Climate Plan (NECP), a strategic document aimed at harmonizing energy and climate policies to ensure sustainable development and economic recovery of Ukraine. The document is being developed under the coordination of the Ministry of Economy and should be adopted in 2024. Also related to the Energy Community’s Decarbonization Roadmap, a law on monitoring, reporting and verification of greenhouse gas emissions was adopted in 2019 and entered into force in 2020, as a first step towards emission trading, followed by a number of secondary legislative acts. However, due to martial law, the monitoring, reporting, and verification system is not fully operational. Ukraine is implementing several pieces of legislation aimed at decreasing carbon emissions across various sectors. The “Law on Highly Efficient Cogeneration” (adopted in February 2023) aims to create incentives for the reconstruction of existing heat-generating facilities into highly efficient installations for the combined production of electricity and thermal energy in line with the principles and provisions of the EU acquis. Guarantees of origin for electricity produced from renewable sources is an important legislative initiative to facilitate the development of the renewables sector. Effective guarantees of origin mechanism are expected to contribute to further development of renewable energy in Ukraine. A recently adopted “Law on Use of Electric Vehicles” aims to support the development of electric vehicles and the infrastructure of electric vehicle charging stations. The Concept of the State Target Program for the Development of the Agricultural Sector until 2022 (adopted in 2019, but loosely enforced) proposes to enhance biodiversity with incentives for conservation and sustainable land use and to implement measures to combat land degradation and desertification. Promoting cleaner household energy, the 2017 “Law on Energy Efficiency Fund” established an Energy Efficiency Fund to introduce incentives and support measures for energy efficiency improvements and savings in buildings. A carbon tax was introduced in 2011 to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. However, the current carbon tax rate of around $0.4 per ton of CO2 is virtually ineffective in strengthening energy efficiency or reducing carbon emissions. The carbon tax is seen more as a fiscal instrument to support the State Budget of Ukraine, but the lack of proper accounting, interaction of public authorities, and control over pollution allowed eligible taxpayers to avoid paying the tax in past years. The country’s efforts to introduce a range of measures to achieve emission reduction goals call for a revision of Ukraine’s carbon pricing strategy. The forest sector contributes around 1 percent of Ukraine’s GDP and provides nearly 200,000 jobs, in particular in the wood processing and furniture industries. The sector is heavily export-oriented, with roughly 50 percent of the timber production, mostly log wood and sawn wood, exported annually. Three million hectares of forests, or 30 percent of the country’s forest area, have been affected by the war in the country (for comparison, Ukraine lost 1.20 million hectares of forests, or 11 percent of tree cover, to urban and agricultural expansion, forest fires, and logging from 2001 to 2022). Despite some positive changes prior to the full-scale war, environmental law enforcement remains limited, leaving space for illegal logging and corruption. Environmental groups have also criticized the government decisions to increase logging volumes, including in protected forests, as part of an effort to boost export earnings and provide timber for the needs of the military as it could lead to large-scale losses in areas where illegal logging and forest mismanagement were already common. Ukraine joined the Greening Government Initiative (GGI) in 2021. Common areas of interest for GGI participants include activities such as increasing the government’s use of renewable energy, transitioning national government buildings and fleets to net-zero emissions, enhancing the resilience of government buildings, establishing sustainable procurement policies, and identifying nature-based solutions. However, there are no mandatory requirements to include environmental and green growth considerations in public procurement in Ukraine. Ukraine is one of 90 countries that have implemented the UN System of Environmental-Economic Accounting, and the country has been publishing at least one account on a regular basis. However, the lack of access to occupied areas and information embargoes due to the martial law may impact the government agencies’ ability to accurately report relevant data. 9. CORRUPTION Ukraine has established a set of specialized anti-corruption institutions responsible for the full criminal justice process as it relates to grand corruption to replace the non-performing law enforcement and judicial systems, including the investigation, prosecution, and adjudication of high-profile corruption cases. Those agencies are the National Agency on Corruption Prevention (NACP), National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU), Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office (SAPO), High Anti-Corruption Court (HACC), and Asset Recovery and Management Agency (ARMA). However, experience has shown that their effectiveness has greatly depended on the quality and integrity of the institution’s leader. The establishment of Ukraine’s anti-corruption system was completed in 2019 with the establishment of the last of the five specialized anti-corruption bodies, the HACC. Ukraine’s anti-corruption bodies have been persistently challenged by the lack of independently selected, permanent leadership, although things have recently improved. As of March 2024, all five institutions have independently selected leaders. This marks an improvement from previous years when some institutions lacked permanent leadership. For all these bodies, successful institutional establishment and leadership selection often only happens because of strict international conditionality. On March 4, 2023, the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine adopted the State Anti-Corruption Program for 2023-2025 as an implementation plan for the National Anti-Corruption Strategy for 2021-2025, adopted by parliament in June 2022. It offers an action plan and timeline for 1,700 actions and policy measures to reduce corruption and safeguard integrity across 15 areas. An online implementation tracker has been launched to monitor the progress of strategy implementation. As of March 2024, 222 measures (18.7%) are implemented (fully and partially). In June 2023, Olena Duma, despite controversy surrounding her appointment process, was appointed as the new head of the Agency for the Recovery and Management of Assets (ARMA). The government appointed her to the position despite one member of the selection committee withdrawing their support for her candidacy. As a result, the legality of her selection through the competition process appeared questionable. While ARMA’s annual report showcases its efforts across multiple operational fronts, it appears that actual asset recovery activities have not been effectively executed. Transparency and adherence to due process are crucial for ARMA to foster accountability and cultivate public confidence in its institutional framework. In December 2023 the Verkhovna Rada adopted changes to the Law on Procuracy strengthening SAPO’s independence: SAPO became a separate legal entity which allowed them to have their own HR, accountant, secrecy units, to own property, etc. The procedure of competitive selection for supervisory positions in the SAPO and positions of prosecutors has been improved and a procedure for independent audit of SAPO’s performance has been established. In February 2024, following an open and transparent selection process, Victor Pavluschyk was appointed as the new head of the National Agency on Corruption Prevention (NACP). Notably, Pavluschyk had previously served as a detective with the NABU since 2015. His appointment marks a significant step forward in ensuring experienced and qualified leadership within Ukraine’s anti-corruption institutions. ASSET DECLARATION Ukrainian public officials must file annual electronic declarations of their income and assets. The National Agency on Corruption Prevention (NACP) was established to collect, verify, and publish asset declarations. The system of electronic disclosure of assets and income of public officials is the most instrumental source of information to monitor the lifestyle of public officials. The information submitted there serves as the basis for official investigations into illicit enrichment and exposing corruption by journalists and civil society monitors. In early 2022, martial law temporarily lifted an obligation to file asset declarations by public servants for security reasons, but in October 2023 the Verkhovna Rada adopted a law restoring the obligations to submit declarations for public servants. OWNERSHIP REGISTRIES Ukraine built state-of-the-art government databases revealing the ultimate beneficial owners of Ukrainian properties, vehicles, land, and legal entities. However, in early 2022 martial law temporarily restricted access to multiple ownership registers based on security concerns. In 2023, access was partially restored after a strong push from civil society. PUBLIC PROCUREMENT Following the full-scale invasion and throughout martial law, public tendering regulations were amended to introduce various limitations and conditionalities to the use of Prozorro, Ukraine’s award-winning electronic public procurement platform for the entire Ukrainian government to publicize procurement solicitations, share requests for proposals, and run auctions. Integrating Ukraine’s anti-corruption achievements into its wartime and rebuilding processes will require using its world-class transparency systems like Prozorro, empowering the specialized anti-corruption bodies with needed resources and permanent leadership, and giving Ukraine’s vibrant civil society a prominent role in planning and overseeing the flow of funds. November 5, 2021, President Zelenskyy signed law #5599 “On the Prevention of Threats to National Security Associated with the Excessive Influence of Persons of Significant Economic and Political Importance in Public Life (Oligarchs)” launching a “de-oligarchization” reform to curb the detrimental impact of oligarchs on economic, political, and public life. The law defines the term “oligarch” through four criteria. Anyone meeting three of those criteria is to be designated an “oligarch” and included into the register of oligarchs subject to prohibitions. The register was due for launch in April 2022, however timely implementation of the reform was impeded by the war. To account for the delay, on February 24, 2023, the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine adopted a new implementation timeline: the registry of oligarchs is due within three months following the receipt of the Venice Commission recommendations to the law. The law will be also subject to amendments to reflect the recommendations of the Venice Commission. The Venice Commission opinion on the Anti-Oligarch law was issued at the June 2023 Venice Commission plenary session. The Commission characterized the law as taking a “personalized” rather than “systemic” approach to de-oligarchization. The VC recommended confronting the problem of oligarchs through effective competition policy, anti-corruption and anti-money-laundering measures, measures to ensure media pluralism, and rules on the financing of political parties and election campaigns. Ukraine’s judicial sector remains weak and prone to corruption, creating another major obstacle to private investment. The head of the Supreme Court of Ukraine was arrested in May 2023 for accepting a $3 million bribe, a sign of ongoing corruption but also the will and capacity of anti-corruption institutions to address it. Nevertheless, efforts to reform the judiciary have made significant progress in recent years. In 2021, parliament adopted historic legislation to reform Ukraine’s two judicial governance bodies: the High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ), the body responsible for selecting new judges, and the High Council of Justice (HCJ), the body responsible for appointing them. The HCJ was reestablished in January 2023 with vetted membership and the HQCJ was reestablished in June 2023. Both institutions are now poised to select and appoint new judges to the roughly 2,200 judge vacancies across the country as well as address a backlog of more than 7,000 judicial misconduct cases, punishing and removing corrupt and criminal judges, as a means to renew Ukraine’s judiciary. The government also eliminated the notoriously corrupt Kyiv District Administrative Court and is in the process of replacing it with an entirely new entity. An additional step to support judicial reforms and advance democracy would be for Ukraine to join the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO). Founded in 2021, its role in the EU integration and accession process is untested. Opening EPPO membership to candidate countries, including Ukraine, could contribute to their alignment with EU judicial standards, and it could strengthen the rule of law early in the integration process. In March 2022, Ukraine became the first non-EU country to sign a working arrangement with the EPPO, focusing on judicial cooperation in criminal matters and information exchange. Fully joining the EPPO would add a layer of EU oversight for EU-funded projects. In an April 2023 USAID, Department of Commerce, and AmCham Ukraine report, U.S. and foreign investors cited corruption, especially as it applies to the judiciary, customs, and government services, as a key challenge in Ukraine. The expansion of digitalization can continue to increase transparency and reduce physical interactions between investors and public sector officials, strengthen existing anti-corruption institutions, strengthen anti-corruption legal framework and the capacities and powers of existing oversight institutions, promote an open approach and communication on corruption and ensure Ukraine’s alignment with EU acquis Directives and accession requirements related to fighting corruption. RESOURCES TO REPORT CORRUPTION NABU, established in October 2014, is the appropriate contact for reporting of high-level corruption. Government of Ukraine contact for combating corruption: National Anti-Corruption Bureau 3, Vasyl Surikov St, Kyiv, Ukraine 03035 Hotline: 0-800-503-200 info@nabu.gov.ua Corruption Reporting email: povidomlennia_zvernennia@nabu.gov.ua Contact at Transparency International: Mr. Andriy Borovyk Executive Director Transparency International Ukraine 37-41 Sichovykh Striltsiv Street, 5th floor, Kyiv, Ukraine 04053+38(044) 360-52-42 borovyk@ti-ukraine.org office@ti-ukraine.org 10. POLITICAL AND SECURITY ENVIRONMENT Russia and its proxy forces have illegally occupied Crimea and portions of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts since 2014. Since the February 2022 full-scale invasion, Russia’s occupation has expanded into portions of Zaporizhya and Kherson oblasts. Russia’s forces have committed countless atrocities, including war crimes and crimes against humanity. The UN estimates Russia’s full-scale invasion has killed at least 18,000 civilians and displaced 12 million more. Russia systematically targets vital infrastructure for water, gas, and electricity, at times disrupting essential service delivery to populated areas. Frequent air strikes threaten population centers throughout Ukraine. The Ukrainian government continues to take measurable steps on governmental reform and transparency. Both political leaders and the public are solidly committed to EU accession, which provides a powerful stimulus for reform; despite the war, the Rada continues to advance legislation in line with EU integration requirements. The government has made significant progress in improving the selection of judges, but key reforms to the Constitutional Court of Ukraine are still pending. Oligarch influence in politics and the economy has declined steadily in recent years and the war has further weakened its grip, but it remains a powerful force in some sectors of the economy. 11. LABOR POLICIES AND PRACTICES Ukraine has a well-educated and skilled labor force of about 17.4 million people (as of January 2022) with a nearly 100 percent literacy rate. Ukraine had a population of 41.13 million people as of February 2022 according to the State Statistical Service. United Nations data show that during 2022 Ukraine’s population shrunk to about 36.3 million people due to war. At the same time, according to the estimates of the Institute of Demography and Social Research of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, the population as of January 1, 2023, ranges from 28 million to 34 million people. According to UN estimates from March 2024, almost 6.48 million Ukrainian refugees have been registered officially worldwide. Almost 3.69 million people are estimated to be displaced inside Ukraine. As of March 2024, over six million refugees from Ukraine have been recorded across Europe and in Europe and almost 476,000 – outside Europe. More than 3.5 million have applied for temporary residence in another country. The ongoing war, loss of territories, destruction and relocation of enterprises, internal and external migration have all resulted in a dramatic worsening of the economic situation in Ukraine. Unemployment has increased sharply, reaching about 30 percent in 2022, 20 percent 2023 and 17 percent in January 2024 according to some estimates (official data is not available for 2022-23), and the burden on the social security system has increased. At the same time, the labor market is characterized by an imbalance in terms of professional qualifications and the regional distribution of labor. According to available government labor statistics, Ukraine’s official unemployment rate was 9.8 percent in January 2022, although unemployment in some regions, particularly in rural areas, remained significantly higher. Self-employment is becoming more common in Ukraine. In 2023, more than 300,000 new sole proprietorships have been opened, while about 33 percent fewer companies opened as compared to 2021. The establishment of new businesses contributed to the increase of jobs. A number of Ukrainian businesses were forced to move locations due to the war, which has had significant implications for the development of regional labor markets. From the beginning of the full-scale invasion until the beginning of December 2023, 7,820 Ukrainian companies left the regions of their permanent registration. Wages in Ukraine remain low by Western standards. In January 2022, the minimum monthly wage was raised to UAH 6,700 ($245) from UAH 6,500 ($238). This minimum monthly wage was retained in 2023. The minimum monthly wage in January 2024 increased to UAH 7,100 ($ 187) and as of April 1 will increase to UAH 8,000 ($200), but due to the national currency depreciation, the minimum wage decreased in USD terms. The real average monthly wage in 2023 was 16,300 ($429) and in 2024 it is expected to grow by 8.5 percent to UAH 22,000 ($578). The highest wages are traditionally in the financial and aviation sectors, while the lowest wages have typically been paid in the agricultural, education, food service, and public health sectors. Ukrainian law allows workers to organize and unions are prevalent in most industries. The law provides most workers with the right to form and join independent unions and to bargain collectively without previous authorization. On July 19, 2022, the Rada passed draft law No. 5371 “On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts on Simplifying the Regulation of Labor Relations in the Field of Small and Medium Enterprises and Reducing the Administrative Burden on Entrepreneurial Activity” with the intention to liberalize Ukraine’s labor relations during martial law. Its provisions regulate employment relations, in particular the conclusion and termination of employment contracts during the wartime. The bill also suspends collective bargaining rights for workers at any employer with 250 or fewer employees, but this provision is to be applied only during martial law. By law, the establishment of a union establishment does not require government permission. Within classic sectors of the economy, sector-specific collective bargaining agreements involve representative employers’ associations (e.g. chemical industry employers), sector trade unions, and some participation of the government through the Ministry of Social Policy. Such agreements can also take place at the regional level. The independence of unions from government or employer control, however, has been disputed by certain labor groups. Independent trade unions alleged that the country’s largest trade union confederation, the Federation of Trade Unions of Ukraine (FPU), enjoys a close relationship with employers and members of some political parties. Unions not affiliated with the FPU were denied a share of disputed trade union assets inherited by the FPU from Soviet-era unions. The law provides for the right to strike “to defend one’s economic and social interests,” as long as strikes do not jeopardize national security, public health, or the rights and liberties of others then the government generally respects this right. The law does not extend the right to strike to personnel of the Prosecutor General’s Office, the judiciary, armed forces, security services, law enforcement agencies, the transportation sector, or public servants. Workers who strike in prohibited sectors may receive prison terms of up to three years. Strikes are prohibited during martial law. The State Labor Service is responsible for enforcing labor laws, although the number of planned and unplanned inspections is generally low. Experts assess the number to be inadequate relative to the size of the Ukrainian economy. Labor inspections were suspended during the first few months of martial law. On July 19, 2022, a Law #2352-IX restored unscheduled labor inspections on a limited list of grounds envisaged in the Article 16 of the Law of Ukraine No. 2136-IX “On the Organization of Labor Relations Under Martial Law.” The grounds for State Labor Inspectors to conduct inspections include: request of an employee or a trade union regarding the verification of employers’ compliance with the provisions of the Law of Ukraine “On the Organization of Labor Relations in the Conditions of Martial Law,” the legality of termination of employment contracts, the detection of unregistered labor relations, etc. The State Labor Service prioritizes the fight against undeclared work. According to the estimate of the State Employment Service of Ukraine, as of March 2023, about 3 million people were working without official registration, which is more than 20 percent of the working population of Ukraine. The National Mediation and Reconciliation Service (NMRS) is responsible for mediating labor disputes. According to official Ukrainian statistics, during 2023, NMRS facilitated the resolution of 143 collective labor disputes: 3 – at the national level; 4 – at the sector level; 3 – at the territorial level and 133 – at the enterprise level. More than 1.6 million workers and 7,668 economic entities participated in these disputes. 12. U.S. INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION (DFC) AND OTHER INVESTMENT INSURANCE PROGRAMS The U.S.-Ukraine Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) Agreement was signed in Washington in 1992. OPIC, now the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation (DFC), currently provides political risk insurance to several U.S. companies operating in Ukraine and has the capacity to insure other eligible investors if such coverage is sought. Ukraine is a member of the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA). DFC has an active pipeline of projects in Ukraine across various sectors. 13. FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT AND FOREIGN PORTFOLIO INVESTMENT STATISTICS VS/LS Table 2: Key Macroeconomic Data, U.S. FDI in Host Country/Economy Host Country Statistical source* USG or international statistical source USG or International Source of Data: BEA; IMF; Eurostat; UNCTAD, Other Economic Data Year Amount Year Amount Host Country Gross Domestic Product (GDP) ($M USD) 2023 $179,000 2022 $160,502.74 https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD?locations=UA Foreign Direct Investment Host Country Statistical source* USG or international statistical source USG or international Source of data: BEA; IMF; Eurostat; UNCTAD, Other U.S. FDI in partner country ($M USD, stock positions) 2021 $-79 2022 $-131 BEA data available at: https://apps.bea.gov/international/factsheet/factsheet.cfm Host country’s FDI in the United States ($M USD, stock positions) 2021 -$ 0 2022 -$1 BEA data available at: Bea: Ukraine – International Trade and Investment Country Facts Total inbound stock of FDI as % host GDP 2023 30.3% 2022 33.7% UNCTAD data available at: https://unctad.org/en/Pages/DIAE/World%20Investment%20Report/Country-Fact-Sheets.aspx * Source for Host Country Data: NBU Table 3: Sources and Destination of FDI Direct Investment from/in Counterpart Economy Data From Top Five Sources/To Top Five Destinations (US Dollars, Millions, NBU data, 2022) Inward Direct Investment Outward Direct Investment Total Inward $50,986.7 100% Total Outward $1680.3 100% Cyprus $70.3 31.1 % Cyprus $834.7 49.7% Netherlands $63.9 19.5% Latvia $50.3 30% Switzerland $58.0 5.1% Russia $35 2.1% Germany $89.2 4.97% Poland $5.0 0.3% UK & Northern Ireland $77.7 4.8% Switzerland $9.7 0.6% “0” reflects amounts rounded to +/- USD 500,000. Source: NBU, 2022 Table 4: Sources of Portfolio Investment Portfolio Investment Assets (preliminary 2022 data) Top Five Partners (Millions, current US Dollars) Total Equity Securities Total Debt Securities All Countries 604 100% All Countries -2 100% All Countries 606 100% 14. CONTACT FOR MORE INFORMATION Jeffrey Joseph Economic Officer U.S. Embassy Kyiv Aviakonstructor Igor Sikorsky St, 4, Kyiv, Ukraine, 04112 +380 44 521 5000 JosephJC@State.gov VIEW REPORT BY: Albania Algeria Andorra Angola Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Australia Austria Bahamas, The Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Azerbaijan Belgium Belize Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Brazil Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burma Burundi Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Côte d’Ivoire Croatia Cyprus Czechia Democratic Republic of the Congo Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Eswatini Ethiopia Fiji Finland France Gabon Gambia, The Georgia Germany Ghana Greece Grenada Guatemala Guinea Guyana Haiti Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyz Republic Laos Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Lithuania Luxembourg Macau Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Mauritania Mauritius Mexico Micronesia Moldova Mongolia Montenegro Morocco Mozambique Namibia Nepal Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Nigeria North Macedonia Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Qatar Republic of the Congo Romania Rwanda Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Somalia South Africa South Korea Spain Sri Lanka Suriname Sweden Switzerland Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom Uruguay Uzbekistan Vietnam West Bank and Gaza Zimbabwe Ukraine ON THIS PAGE search > < 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2. 1. Openness To, and Restrictions Upon, Foreign Investment 1. Policies Toward Foreign Direct Investment 2. Limits on Foreign Control and the Right to Private Ownership and Establishment 3. Other Investment Policy Reviews 4. Business Facilitation 5. Outward Investment 3. 2. Bilateral Investment and Taxation Treaties 4. 3. Legal Regime 1. Transparency of the Regulatory System 2. International Regulatory Considerations 3. Legal System and Judicial Independence 4. Laws and Regulations on Foreign Direct Investment 5. Competition and Anti-Trust Laws 6. Expropriation and Compensation 7. Dispute Settlement 1. Investor-State Dispute Settlement 2. International Commercial Arbitration and Foreign Courts 8. Bankruptcy Regulations 5. 4. Industrial Policies 1. Investment Incentives 2. Foreign Trade Zones/Free Ports/Trade Facilitation 3. Performance and Data Localization Requirements 6. 5. Protection of Property Rights 1. Real Property 2. Intellectual Property Rights 7. 6. Financial Sector 1. Capital Markets and Portfolio Investment 2. Money and Banking System 3. Foreign Exchange and Remittances 1. Foreign Exchange 2. Remittance Policies 4. Sovereign Wealth Funds 8. 7. State-Owned Enterprises 1. Privatization Program 9. 8. Responsible Business Conduct 1. Additional Resources 1. 2. Climate issues 1. 10. 9. Corruption 1. Asset declaration 2. Ownership registries 3. Public procurement 4. Resources to Report Corruption 11. 10. Political and Security Environment 12. 11. Labor Policies and Practices 13. 12. U.S. International Development Finance Corporation (DFC) and Other Investment Insurance Programs 14. 13. Foreign Direct Investment and Foreign Portfolio Investment Statistics VS/LS 15. 14. Contact for More Information Tags Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs Investment Climate Investment Climate Statements Ukraine Back to Top * White House * USA.gov * Office of the Inspector General * Archives * Contact Us follow us Facebook X Instagram YouTube Flickr GovDelivery * Privacy Policy * Accessibility Statement * Copyright Information * FOIA * No FEAR Act U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE THE LESSONS OF 1989: FREEDOM AND OUR FUTURE Give feedback Close WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL SATISFACTION WITH THIS SITE? 1 2 3 4 5 Have feedback about our website? Note: we can’t address visa or passport issues through this box. /1000 Submit Don't show this again Cookie Icon We use cookies to make our website work better and improve your experience. By continuing to use the site, you agree to our Privacy Policy Allow Decline Close Cookie Preferences This website uses the following types of services. Learn more from our Cookie Policy. Accordion Toggle Close Strictly Necessary Always Active Strictly Necessary services are absolutely necessary for core functions such as navigating the page or accessing secure areas. The website cannot function properly without these cookies. Accordion Toggle Close Analytics analytics Toggle Analytics services serve to improve the performance and functionality of this website by collecting and reporting information anonymously. Accordion Toggle Close Marketing marketing Toggle Marketing services are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers. Allow All Decline Accept Selected