www.pewresearch.org Open in urlscan Pro
192.0.66.2  Public Scan

Submitted URL: https://lnkd.in/ep6dtAyF
Effective URL: https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2022/03/03/the-changing-political-geography-of-covid-19-over-the-last-two-years/
Submission: On January 17 via api from JP — Scanned from JP

Form analysis 2 forms found in the DOM

https://www.pewresearch.org/

<form role="search" action="https://www.pewresearch.org/">
  <div class="ui action fluid input">
    <input type="search" placeholder="Search pewresearch.org..." spellcheck="false" data-ms-editor="true" value="" name="s">
    <button class="ui icon secondary button">
      <i class="search icon"></i>
    </button>
  </div>
</form>

https://www.pewresearch.org/

<form role="search" action="https://www.pewresearch.org/">
  <div class="ui action fluid input">
    <input type="search" placeholder="Search pewresearch.org..." spellcheck="false" data-ms-editor="true" value="" name="s">
    <button class="ui icon secondary button">
      <i class="search icon"></i>
    </button>
  </div>
</form>

Text Content

Numbers, Facts and Trends Shaping Your World
Newsletters Press Donate My Account

Read our research on: Congress | Economy | COVID-19


Research Topics
All PublicationsMethodsShort ReadsTools & ResourcesExpertsAbout


TOPICS

Politics & PolicyInternational AffairsImmigration & MigrationRace &
EthnicityReligionGenerations & AgeGender & LGBTQ
Family & RelationshipsEconomy & WorkScienceInternet & TechnologyNews Habits &
MediaMethodological ResearchFull topic list

REGIONS & COUNTRIES

Asia & the PacificEurope & RussiaLatin AmericaMiddle East & North AfricaNorth
AmericaSub-Saharan AfricaMultiple Regions / Worldwide

FORMATS

FeaturesFact SheetsVideosData Essays

Research Topics

TOPICS

Politics & PolicyInternational AffairsImmigration & MigrationRace &
EthnicityReligionGenerations & AgeGender & LGBTQFamily & RelationshipsEconomy &
WorkScienceInternet & TechnologyNews Habits & MediaMethodological ResearchFull
topic list

REGIONS & COUNTRIES

Asia & the PacificEurope & RussiaLatin AmericaMiddle East & North AfricaNorth
AmericaSub-Saharan AfricaMultiple Regions / Worldwide

FORMATS

FeaturesFact SheetsVideosData Essays
All PublicationsMethodsShort ReadsTools & ResourcesExpertsAboutMy Account
DONATE

Read our research on: Congress | Economy | COVID-19

Home Research Topics Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19)


THE CHANGING POLITICAL GEOGRAPHY OF COVID-19 OVER THE LAST TWO YEARS

By Bradley Jones
March 3, 2022
 * Facebook
 * Twitter
 * LinkedIn

Over the past two years, the official count of coronavirus deaths in the United
States has risen and is now approaching 1 million lives. Large majorities of
Americans say they personally know someone who has been hospitalized or died of
the coronavirus, and it has impacted – in varying degrees – nearly every aspect
of life.

A new Pew Research Center analysis of official reports of COVID-19-related
deaths across the country, based on mortality data collected by The New York
Times, shows how the dynamics of the pandemic have shifted over the past two
years.


A TIMELINE OF THE SHIFTING GEOGRAPHY OF THE PANDEMIC

Monthly reported coronavirus deaths per 100,000 residents by county
Play
 * Mar '20
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * Aug '20
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * Jan '21
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * Jun '21
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * Oct '21
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * Feb '22


Source: Pew Research Center analysis of COVID-19 data collected by The New York
Times as of Feb. 28, 2022. See methodology for details.
“The Changing Political Geography of COVID-19 Over the Last Two Years”

How we did this

Pew Research Center conducted this analysis to understand how the geography of
the coronavirus outbreak has changed over its course. For this analysis, we
relied on official reports of deaths attributed to the novel coronavirus
collected and maintained by The New York Times.

The estimates provided in this report are subject to several sources of error.
There may be significant differences between the true number of deaths due to
COVID-19 and the official reported counts of those deaths. There may also be
variation across the states in the quality and types of data reported. For
example, most states report deaths based on the residency of the deceased person
rather than the location where they died. The New York Times collects data from
many different local health agencies, and this likely leads to some additional
measurement error.

This analysis relies on county-level data. Counties in the United States vary
widely in their population sizes, so in many places in the essay, we divide
counties into approximately equal-sized groups (in terms of their population)
for comparability or report on population adjusted death rates rather than total
counts of deaths.

The pandemic has rolled across the U.S. unevenly and in waves. Today, the death
toll of the pandemic looks very different from how it looked in the early part
of 2020. The first wave (roughly the first 125,000 deaths from March 2020
through June 2020) was largely geographically concentrated in the Northeast and
in particular the New York City region. During the summer of 2020, the largest
share of the roughly 80,000 deaths that occurred during the pandemic’s second
wave were in the southern parts of the country.

The fall and winter months of 2020 and early 2021 were the deadliest of the
pandemic to date. More than 370,000 Americans died of COVID-19 between October
2020 and April 2021; the geographic distinctions that characterized the earlier
waves became much less pronounced.

By the spring and summer of 2021, the nationwide death rate had slowed
significantly, and vaccines were widely available to all adults who wanted them.
But starting at the end of the summer, the fourth and fifth waves (marked by new
variants of the virus, delta and then omicron) came in quick succession and
claimed more than 300,000 lives.

In many cases, the characteristics of communities that were associated with
higher death rates at the beginning of the pandemic are now associated with
lower death rates (and vice versa). Early in the pandemic, urban areas were
disproportionately impacted. During the first wave, the coronavirus death rate
in the 10% of the country that lives in the most densely populated counties was
more than nine times that of the death rate among the 10% of the population
living in the least densely populated counties. In each subsequent wave,
however, the nation’s least dense counties have registered higher death rates
than the most densely populated places.

Despite the staggering death toll in densely populated urban areas during the
first months of the pandemic (an average 36 monthly deaths per 100,000
residents), the overall death rate over the course of the pandemic is slightly
higher in the least populated parts of the country (an average monthly 15 deaths
per 100,000 among the 10% living in the least densely populated counties vs. 13
per 100,000 among the 10% in the most densely populated counties).

As the relationship between population density and coronavirus death rates has
changed over the course of the pandemic, so too has the relationship between
counties’ voting patterns and their death rates from COVID-19.

In the spring of 2020, the areas recording the greatest numbers of deaths were
much more likely to vote Democratic than Republican. But by the third wave of
the pandemic, which began in fall 2020, the pattern had reversed: Counties that
voted for Donald Trump over Joe Biden were suffering substantially more deaths
from the coronavirus pandemic than those that voted for Biden over Trump. This
reversal is likely a result of several factors including differences in
mitigation efforts and vaccine uptake, demographic differences, and other
differences that are correlated with partisanship at the county level.

During this third wave – which continued into early 2021 – the coronavirus death
rate among the 20% of Americans living in counties that supported Trump by the
highest margins in 2020 was about 170% of the death rate among the one-in-five
Americans living in counties that supported Biden by the largest margins.

As vaccines became more widely available, this discrepancy between “blue” and
“red” counties became even larger as the virulent delta strain of the pandemic
spread across the country during the summer and fall of 2021, even as the total
number of deaths fell somewhat from its third wave peak.

A testing site at Dayton General Hospital in Dayton, Washington, in October
2021. (Nick Otto for The Washington Post)

During the fourth wave of the pandemic, death rates in the most pro-Trump
counties were about four times what they were in the most pro-Biden counties.
When the highly transmissible omicron variant began to spread in the U.S. in
late 2021, these differences narrowed substantially. However, death rates in the
most pro-Trump counties were still about 180% of what they were in the most
pro-Biden counties throughout late 2021 and early 2022.

The cumulative impact of these divergent death rates is a wide difference in
total deaths from COVID-19 between the most pro-Trump and most pro-Biden parts
of the country. Since the pandemic began, counties representing the 20% of the
population where Trump ran up his highest margins in 2020 have experienced
nearly 70,000 more deaths from COVID-19 than have the counties representing the
20% of population where Biden performed best. Overall, the COVID-19 death rate
in all counties Trump won in 2020 is substantially higher than it is in counties
Biden won (as of the end of February 2022, 326 per 100,000 in Trump counties and
258 per 100,000 in Biden counties).


PARTISAN DIVIDE IN COVID-19 DEATHS WIDENED AS MORE VACCINES BECAME AVAILABLE

Partisan differences in COVID-19 death rates expanded dramatically after the
availability of vaccines increased. Unvaccinated people are at far higher risk
of death and hospitalization from COVID-19, according to the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, and vaccination decisions are strongly associated with
partisanship. Among the large majority of counties for which reliable
vaccination data exists, counties that supported Trump at higher margins have
substantially lower vaccination rates than those that supported Biden at higher
margins.

An Army soldier prepares to immunize a woman for COVID-19 at a state-run
vaccination site at Miami Dade College North Campus in North Miami, Florida, in
March 2021. (Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

Counties with lower rates of vaccination registered substantially greater death
rates during each wave in which vaccines were widely available.

During the fall of 2021 (roughly corresponding to the delta wave), about 10% of
Americans lived in counties with adult vaccination rates lower than 40% as of
July 2021. Death rates in these low-vaccination counties were about six times as
high as death rates in counties where 70% or more of the adult population was
vaccinated.

More Americans were vaccinated heading into the winter of 2021 and 2022 (roughly
corresponding to the omicron wave), but nearly 10% of the country lived in areas
where less than half of the adult population was vaccinated as of November 2021.
Death rates in these low-vaccination counties were roughly twice what they were
in counties that had 80% or more of their population vaccinated. (Note: The
statistics here reflect the death rates in the county as a whole, not rates for
vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals, though individual-level data finds that
death rates among unvaccinated people are far higher than among vaccinated
people.)

Methodology

This analysis relies on official reports of deaths attributed to COVID-19 in the
United States collected and reported by The New York Times.

COVID-19 deaths in Puerto Rico and other U.S. territories are not included in
this analysis. Additionally, deaths without a specific geographic location have
been excluded.

Data was pulled from the GitHub repository maintained by The New York Times on
March 1, 2022, and reflects reported coronavirus deaths through Feb. 28.

There are several anomalies in the deaths data. Many locales drop off their
reporting on the weekends and holidays. In addition to the rhythm of the
reporting cycle, there are many instances where a locality will revise the count
of its deaths downward (usually only by a small amount) or release a large batch
of previously unreported deaths on a single day. The downward revisions were
identified and retroactively applied to earlier days.

Large batches of cases were identified by finding days that increased by more
than 10 deaths and were 10 standard deviations above the norm for a county
within a 30-day window. Deaths reported in these anomalous batches were then
evenly distributed across the days leading up to when they were released.

Population data for U.S. counties comes from the 2015-2019 American Community
Survey estimates published by the Census Bureau (accessed through the tidycensus
package in R on Feb. 21). The 2020 vote share for each county was purchased from
Dave Leip’s Election Atlas (downloaded on Nov. 21, 2021).

The analysis looks at deaths among counties based on their 2020 vote. Counties
were grouped into five groups with approximately equal population. For analyses
that include 2020 vote, Alaskan counties are excluded because Alaska does not
report its election results at the county level. The table below provides more
details.

This essay benefited greatly from thoughtful comments and consultation with many
individuals around Pew Research Center. Jocelyn Kiley, Carroll Doherty and Jeb
Bell provided invaluable editorial guidance. Peter Bell and Alissa Scheller
contributed their expertise in visualization, Ben Wormald built the map
animation, and Reem Nadeem did the digital production. Andrew Daniller provided
careful attention to the quality check process, and David Kent’s watchful copy
editing eye brought clarity to some difficult concepts.

Lead photo: Kent Nishimura/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images




FACTS ARE MORE IMPORTANT THAN EVER

In times of uncertainty, good decisions demand good data. Please support our
research with a financial contribution.

Donate



1615 L St. NW, Suite 800
Washington, DC 20036
USA
(+1) 202-419-4300 | Main
(+1) 202-857-8562 | Fax
(+1) 202-419-4372 | Media Inquiries

Research Topics

Politics & PolicyInternational AffairsImmigration & MigrationRace &
EthnicityReligionGenerations & AgeGender & LGBTQ
Family & RelationshipsEconomy & WorkScienceInternet & TechnologyNews Habits &
MediaMethodological ResearchFull topic list
Follow Us

Email Newsletters Facebook Twitter Tumblr YouTube RSS

About Pew Research Center Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that
informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world. It
conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, media content analysis
and other empirical social science research. Pew Research Center does not take
policy positions. It is a subsidiary of The Pew Charitable Trusts.


Copyright 2023 Pew Research Center About Terms & Conditions Privacy Policy
Reprints, Permissions & Use Policy Feedback Careers