www.barrons.com Open in urlscan Pro
2600:9000:2057:3800:14:c68f:c40:93a1  Public Scan

URL: https://www.barrons.com/articles/the-fed-is-ignoring-the-money-supply-and-letting-inflation-rip-51642755601
Submission: On January 24 via api from CH — Scanned from DE

Form analysis 1 forms found in the DOM

<form autocomplete="off">
  <div id="scrim-from-wrap" class="input-wrap">
    <label for="scrim-from">From</label>
    <textarea id="scrim-from" readonly="readonly" disabled="disabled" type="text" autocomplete="off" autocorrect="off" autocapitalize="none"></textarea>
  </div>
  <div id="scrim-to-wrap" class="input-wrap">
    <label for="scrim-to">To</label>
    <input id="scrim-to" type="text" autocomplete="off" autocorrect="off" autocapitalize="none">
  </div>
  <div class="input-wrap">
    <label for="scrim-message">Message</label>
    <textarea id="scrim-message" class="msg" maxlength="500" type="text" autocomplete="off" autocorrect="off" autocapitalize="none"></textarea>
  </div>
</form>

Text Content

We've detected you are on Internet Explorer. For the best Barrons.com
experience, please update to a modern browser.

CHROME SAFARI FIREFOX
We've detected you are on Internet Explorer. For the best Barrons.com
experience, please update to a modern browser.GoogleFirefox

Search News & Quotes
Barron's
TopicsStock PicksMagazineDataAdvisorPenta100 Years
Subscribe Now
|Sign In


Barrons
A Grim History Repeats at the Fed
Next:
The 4% Rule Might Not Work, This Retirement Expert Says. Here’s His Strategy for
a Downturn.

 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 

Share



This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. To order
presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or
customers visit http://www.djreprints.com.

https://www.barrons.com/articles/the-fed-is-ignoring-the-money-supply-and-letting-inflation-rip-51642755601

 * Federal Reserve
 * Other Voices


A GRIM HISTORY REPEATS AT THE FED

 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMENTARY
By
Robert Heller
Updated January 23, 2022 / Original January 21, 2022
 * Order Reprints
 * Print Article

BARRON'S NEWSLETTERS


THE BARRON'S DAILY

A morning briefing on what you need to know in the day ahead, including
exclusive commentary from Barron's and MarketWatch writers.

I would also like to receive updates and special offers from Dow Jones and
affiliates. I can unsubscribe at any time.
I agree to the Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy.

Enter your Email

SIGN UP

You have been successfully subscribed to The Barron's Daily. Your first delivery
will arrive within two days.

Continue Reading

Text size

Your browser does not support the audio tag.
Listen to article
Length 6 minutes
AD
Loading advertisement...
00:00 / 05:42
1x

This feature is powered by text-to-speech technology. Want to see it on more
articles?
Give your feedback below or email product@barrons.com.
thumb-stroke-mediumthumb-stroke-medium

FARMERS DESCENDED ON WASHINGTON TO PROTEST HIGH INTEREST RATES IN 1979.

Charles Harrity/AP/Shutterstock

About the author: Robert Heller is a former member of the Federal Reserve Board
of Governors.



As Milton Freedman said in 1970, “Inflation is always and everywhere a monetary
phenomenon.” Little has changed since then.

For most of the 1970s, Arthur Burns was chairman of the Federal Reserve Board.
Inflation


CAN WE WHIP INFLATION NOW? GOOD LUCK WITH THAT.

Rising prices have played a crucial role in all of America’s worst economic
episodes, but there’s no sure fix without risking recession.

Continue reading


was rampant, just like now. Consumer price inflation averaged nearly 7% during
his term. As Friedman diagnosed correctly, this rapid inflation was mainly
caused by increases in the money supply of over 12% in the years 1971-72 and
1976-77. Instead, Burns attributed the price increases mainly to wage pressures,
monopoly power, and the oil shock of the early 1970s.

Sound familiar? Inflation is again soaring, and the Fed blames supply
constraints caused by the pandemic while neglecting to look at the increasing
money supply as the main cause. It’s always easier to blame external factors
rather than something that you control and have responsibility for.



I had the honor of serving under Chairman Paul Volcker on the Federal Reserve
Board starting in 1986, when he was trying to bring inflation under control.
President Jimmy Carter had appointed Volcker in August 1979 with the mandate to
reduce the double-digit inflation rate. President Ronald Reagan confirmed this
objective after he took office. With determination, Volcker raised the
federal-funds rate to 20% by June 1981 and reduced the growth of the money
supply. Not one, but two back-to-back recessions resulted.

The situation in Washington was tense while the monetary policy medicine took
its course. But Volcker and the board prevailed and reduced the annual growth
rate of the money supply from over 12.6% in 1979 to a much more reasonable 5.3%
when he left the Fed in August 1987. Alan Greenspan continued the
anti-inflationary policies. By the time I left the board in 1989, consumer price
increases had moderated to only 4.6%.

The Fed was on its way to defeating inflation and keeping it under control for
the rest of the century. The falling interest rates that accompanied the decline
in inflation were a welcome side effect. These low rates supported decades of
growth and prosperity.



Fast forward to 2020. In response to the sharpest recession in U.S. history, the
government instituted unprecedented fiscal stimulus measures that sharply
increased the federal deficit. The Federal Reserve supported these fiscal
actions by buying up much of the newly issued debt. As a result, the ratio of
debt to gross domestic product reached a record 136%, while the M2 money supply
skyrocketed from $15 trillion in January 2020 to $21 trillion in November 2021.

Largely unrelated to the pandemic, but occurring at the same time, the Federal
Reserve implemented a significant change in its operating procedures and
long-term strategy. After extensive deliberations, the Fed revised


THE FED’S NEW POLICY MEANS RATES WILL STAY LOWER LONGER. THE PRICE: FINANCIAL
TURBULENCE.

The central bank wants to maximize employment and lift inflation, and it’s
willing to ignore the trade-off. The risk is asset inflation and financial
imbalances that may end in a crash.

Continue reading


its “Statement on Longer-Run Goals and Monetary Policy Strategy” in August 2020.
In it, the Fed essentially tossed the congressional mandate for “price
stability” or zero inflation overboard and reaffirmed its target of 2% for the
Personal Consumption Expenditures Price index. It added the explicit proviso
that periods of sub-2% inflation should be compensated by periods of above-2%
price increases. Amazingly, the words “money” or “money supply” are nowhere to
be found in this statement on monetary-policy strategy.

This change in strategy opened the gates for an excessively expansive monetary
policy after a decade of rather subdued inflation. When the pandemic hit, the
Fed engaged in massive quantitative easing through the purchase of Treasury
bonds and mortgage-backed securities that resulted in 25% money growth. These
actions were flanked by direct lending by the Fed to the public under a dozen
Section 13(3) facilities.

Just as Friedman predicted, prices reacted with a lag. At the end of 2021,
producer prices were soaring at a rate of nearly 10% and consumer prices were
rising at over 7% year over year.



At the beginning of 2022, inflation is again running at full steam. However, the
Fed is still pursuing a highly accommodative monetary policy by buying billions
of Treasuries and mortgage-backed securities every month. How does it make sense
to buy these instruments, while housing prices


WILL HOME PRICES DROP NEXT YEAR? HOUSING EXPERTS SAY THEY’LL KEEP CLIMBING.

The median home sale price is expected to rise by 5.7% in 2022.

Continue reading


are exploding at an annual clip of nearly 20%? In addition, the Fed is still
holding its foot on the gas pedal by maintaining the fed-funds rate at
essentially zero. The Fed continues to provide more fuel for an already soaring
inflation.

Even more disconcerting may be the fact that during the past two years, the Fed
not even once mentioned the word “money” in its official press releases at the
conclusion of each Federal Open Market Committee meeting. One must ask how an
institution charged with the control and implementation of monetary policy can
be so negligent and dismissive of the key asset—money—over which it exercises
total control, and which is at the fulcrum of the implementation of monetary
policy. How long does it take to change an irrational policy that is clearly
inconsistent with the congressional mandate for price stability?

Just like Arthur Burns, the current Fed leadership is ignoring the sharp
increase in the money supply during the past two years and instead is blaming
external factors. As a result, inflation is again soaring. History is repeating
itself.

Milton Friedman will be turning in his grave.

Guest commentaries like this one are written by authors outside the Barron’s and
MarketWatch newsroom. They reflect the perspective and opinions of the authors.
Submit commentary proposals and other feedback to ideas@barrons.com.





















--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 * Retirement
 * Q&A


THE 4% RULE MIGHT NOT WORK, THIS RETIREMENT EXPERT SAYS. HERE’S HIS STRATEGY FOR
A DOWNTURN.

 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

By
Neal Templin
Updated January 23, 2022 / Original January 22, 2022
 * Order Reprints
 * Print Article



RETIREMENT SCHOLAR WADE PFAU ON A COMMON RETIREMENT DRAWDOWN RULE OF THUMB: 'I
THINK THERE IS SOMETHING LIKE A 65% TO 70% CHANCE THAT THE 4% RULE WORKS FOR
TODAY’S RETIREES RATHER THAN BEING A NEAR CERTAINTY.'

Courtesy Wade Pfau

Economist Wade Pfau has been thinking about retirement since he was in 20s. But
not just his own retirement. 

Pfau started studying Social Security for his dissertation while getting his
Ph.D. at Princeton University in the early 2000s. At the time, Republicans
wanted to divert part of the Social Security payroll tax into a 401(k)-style
savings plan. Pfau concluded it might supply sufficient retirement income for
retirees—but only if markets cooperated. 

Today,...

Subscribe or Sign In
to continue reading


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


More from News Corp
 * Realtor.com
   Looking to buy your first home? You’ve come to the right place.
 * Wall Street Journal
   Financial Services Roundup: Market Talk
 * MarketWatch
   Irritable Bowel Syndrome Market to grow at a CAGR of 10.09% by 2025 |IBS-D
   Segment to be Significant for Revenue Generation|17000+ Technavio Reports
 * Realtor.com
   The Property Brothers Reveal 3 Dated Features Many Homes Still Have Today:
   Does Yours?
 * PENTA
   27-Year-Old Tech Trailblazer Buys $6.7 Million Home at Miami’s One Thousand
   Museum

Close


A GRIM HISTORY REPEATS AT THE FED



From
To
Message

SEND

An error has occurred, please try again later.

Thank you

This article has been sent to



Privacy Notice
Cookie Notice
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Copyright Policy
Data Policy
Your Ad Choices
Subscriber Agreement & Terms of Use
Barron's Archive
Corporate Subscriptions
Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Barron's






Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of
this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. For
non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints
at 1-800-843-0008 or visit www.djreprints.com.