articles.centercentre.com Open in urlscan Pro
2a06:98c1:3121::3  Public Scan

Submitted URL: https://43c30.r.a.d.sendibm1.com/mk/cl/f/sh/1t6Af4OiGsFVLUgwGjEUzkgwmvuMV8/XWpRBKIE8hKy
Effective URL: https://articles.centercentre.com/strategic-ux-research-is-the-next-big-thing/?utm_source=brevo&utm_campaign=UXDX%20Cross%20Functi...
Submission: On July 27 via manual from CZ — Scanned from FR

Form analysis 1 forms found in the DOM

POST https://www.centercentre.com/newsletter/

<form method="post" action="https://www.centercentre.com/newsletter/">
  <fieldset>
    <div class="field">
      <label for="email">Your Email</label><br>
      <input type="email" name="email" required="" value="" id="email" placeholder="you@example.com" tabindex="-1">
    </div>
    <div class="field">
      <input type="hidden" name="successurl" value="https://articles.centercentre.com/strategic-ux-research-is-the-next-big-thing/?inspire=success">
      <input type="submit" name="submit" class="button final-focusable-element" value="Get Inspired" tabindex="-1">
    </div>
  </fieldset>
</form>

Text Content

Menu
 * Center Centre Programs
 * Articles

Want to improve your organization’s UX strategy?


CENTER CENTRE ARTICLES


STRATEGIC UX RESEARCH IS THE NEXT BIG THING

by Jared M. Spool


Strategic UX Research is how organizations connect their long-term direction and
strategy to customers’ and users’ deepest needs. It’s been around for a while
but only recently has caught the attention of top executives.

It’s a profound awakening to the total value that great user experiences bring
to both the organization and the people it serves.

These organization leaders will work with a detailed, shared understanding of
their customers’ and users’ experiences. They’ll use that understanding to set
the business’s direction, determine where to invest, and focus the
organization’s long-term and short-term directions on efforts that dramatically
improve those experiences. Strategic UX research changes the relationship senior
executives and stakeholders have with the people who benefit from the
organization’s products and services.

Strategic UX Research is a force multiplier. Organizations get more done with
the same number of people. It delivers superpowers to the senior executives,
enabling their organization to be a visionary market leader because the entire
team has a better picture of how their product improves people’s lives.


THE BENEFITS THAT STRATEGIC UX RESEARCH DELIVERS.

Every organization, independent of its industry or nature, can benefit from
Strategic UX Research.

For example, for a financial services organization focusing on the trading
floor, Strategic UX Research delivers senior executives and stakeholders a deep
understanding of what daily life on the floor is like. They’d see how the most
nuanced functionality dramatically changes the experience traders and their
clients have. The benefits of that nuanced functionality would be things nobody
would see if they didn’t have a deep understanding of trading floor life.

Or, for an education product company, their senior stakeholders and executives
see how different classroom environments require different solution approaches.
Instead of trying to force a one-size-fits-all product into the market (and
meeting nobody’s actual needs), they’d understand how investing in an adaptable
solution accommodates all varieties of educational environments and
requirements, opening up considerable market opportunities.

A government organization uses its Strategic UX Research to bring home the
experiences of the most marginalized individuals they serve. They can see a
direct relationship between specific service enhancements and increased access
to the benefits they deliver. This becomes the underlying rationale for new
funding options, with detailed data demonstrating how better experiences improve
people’s lives.

Every organization, big and small, benefits from Strategic UX Research. It
delivers a human-centered approach, contributing to long-term success while
providing immediate wins.


THE TRAP OF BEING TOO TACTICAL.

There’s a saying in the UX world that the first phase of a project is to figure
out Are we building the right thing? and the second phase is to figure out Are
we building the thing right?

That second phase is where Tactical UX Research comes in. This is what the UX
research teams conduct to make sure they’re building things right.

Tactical UX Research includes surveys to learn how people think about your
products and services, interviews to understand what potential users and
customers might want from the product, and usability testing to see if what’s
been built will do the job. It’s all in the service of making sure that the
product is built right.

Most teams spend the majority of their time conducting tactical UX research.
They’re dedicating their efforts to ensuring every new feature and capability is
the best. Yet, they feel they’re doing a mediocre job.

The problem is, when you only work tactically, you never feel like you’re making
progress. The teams always doing tactical UX research are caught in a feature
factory.

These teams rush to squeeze research in before the agile sprint is complete,
then push out some basic recommendations. Yet, their product and development
peers ignore those recommendations because there’s not enough time or resources
to act on them. Then it’s time to repeat the process with the next batch of
functionality coming off the assembly line. This inches each research team
member towards burnout.

This is the trap of being too tactical.


STRATEGIC UX RESEARCH ENSURES YOU’RE SOLVING THE RIGHT PROBLEMS.

Tactical UX Research is essential for preventing issues that make the product
implementation better. These are issues that, if not addressed, will cause
increased support calls or problems with product adoption. Those are necessary
risks to avoid, for sure.

However, far more critical risks will affect the organization’s long-term
success. Mitigating these risks is where Strategic UX Research comes in.

The questions about “building the right thing” or “building the thing right”
aren’t phases. Instead, they are types of risk.

This becomes clearer when we adopt a perspective by Jen Cardello, Fidelity
Investments’ Senior Vice President and Head of their Research and Insights
efforts. Jen explained in her seminal presentation, Scaling User Research, that
she looks at the building the right thing question as two strategic questions:
Are we building the right solution? and Are we solving the right problem?

Strategic UX Research is what organizations use to answer Jen’s questions. These
questions address the highest risks.

If the organization isn’t solving the highest-risk problems, the solutions don’t
matter. And it certainly doesn’t matter if a solution for the wrong problem is
built right.

This differs from Tactical UX Research, which doesn’t come into play until
executives and senior stakeholders have already decided on the problem and
solution they want their teams to execute. By then, it’s too late to change
direction because they’ve already decided on their strategy.

Without Strategic UX Research, they make these decisions based on risky,
low-quality, third-party sources.

Maybe the stakeholders heard about a trend at an industry conference without
knowing how it benefits their customers or users.

Or they see a competitor add a new capability without understanding the problem
that the new capability solves.

Or maybe a customer with deep pockets asks for a specific solution without a
clear sense of whether this will improve or deteriorate the experience of other
customers.

Deciding to go ahead with one of these is a risky bet. The less Strategic UX
Research the organization’s stakeholders have at their fingertips, the more
likely they’ll make poor decisions and costly mistakes.

When executives and senior stakeholders have the Strategic UX Research they
need, they no longer need to make bets based on those third-party sources.
Instead, the research efforts show the need for new capabilities and approaches
long before these third-party sources do. And make it easy to disqualify ideas
that will fail before investing any effort to try to make them work.


STRATEGIC UX RESEARCH GOES DEEP INTO EXPERIENCES.

Tactical UX Research rarely affects more than the specific feature or product a
development team is working on. The research results only describe immediate
recommendations or changes that need to make the product just a tiny bit better.
Rarely does Tactical UX Research build a better understanding of the users or
what they need in the long term.

Strategic UX Research, conversely, is about attaining a deeper understanding of
all the different users and their individual experiences. Everyone learns more
about what makes an excellent experience for users and customers and where the
experience could be better.

These experiences go beyond just using the organization’s products or services.
It includes what happens leading up to their use, between uses, and after the
person has interacted with the product. Strategic UX Research learns the
entirety of the experiences people have.

Research teams orchestrate deep hanging-out sessions with customers and users.
They collect observations and insights that show what a day in the life of users
could be. They combine different experiences with the product or service across
the user’s lifetime. They connect this all together to show a detailed journey.


THE POWER OF DEEP HANGING OUT.

For the last year, one client has been doing just this. Their organization is a
leading manufacturer of scientific instruments and software. The executive team
was concerned the competition was catching up, so they put a new emphasis on
innovation.

Yet, none of their textbook approaches to delivering innovative products worked
for them. After a series of new products that didn’t meet expectations, they
decided to employ Strategic UX Research to determine why.

They started by sending a cross-disciplinary team of researchers, product
managers, and engineers to do some deep hanging out at several labs of important
customers. The team spent a couple of days at each lab, observing the work of
the lab technicians.

Within a few visits, the team noticed patterns emerging. While the individual
instruments worked well, the technicians had trouble making them work together.

The equipment, designed in corporate silos, didn’t play well with other
instruments. This was true whether it was a competitor’s instrument or
their own.

Each instrument had a distinctive way of preparing samples, feeding those
samples into the machine, setting up the analysis through the control panels,
and capturing the results. These differences slowed the technicians down,
created more errors and sample contamination opportunities, and required more
source material to extract samples from.

Interestingly, few technicians ever complained to the research team or their
sales representatives about the extra work and mistakes they made. The
technicians had always worked this way and figured it was just how things
should be.

The deep hanging-out team saw it differently. They saw each issue as an
opportunity to deliver a substantially improved technician experience. They had
no trouble imagining how the next generation of instruments could provide an
integrated analysis experience, reduce the chance of preparation errors, and
reduce the quantity of source material required.

The research team also spent significant time at each customer site visiting
with the lab administrators. They learned how the lab was managed and what the
administrators valued most.

Again, their deep hanging out revealed patterns. This time, the patterns were in
what different lab administrators were concerned about. The high error rates and
long analysis periods reduced the throughput of the labs, making it hard to
produce results promptly. The large variability in processing time made it
difficult to predict when the results would be ready.


WHEN STAKEHOLDERS PUT USERS’ NEEDS AT THE CENTER.

Upon returning to corporate headquarters, the team set out to replicate what
they’d seen by creating a mock laboratory with a similar range of instruments.
They invited executives and senior stakeholders to walk through what they’d
seen, reenacting the observed experiences of the technicians. They even brought
several customer technicians into their mock lab to demonstrate their typical
work experiences.

This research led to the stakeholders realizing that there were tremendous
opportunities to deliver a much-improved lab technician experience. This new
experience would be faster, error-free, predictable, and substantially less
costly to operate the lab.

The sales team agreed this new experience would be desirable to customers. And
it would substantially beat their competitors.

In addition, the executives loved the idea of leading an industry standard for
sample preparation that would make their machines more interoperable with
everyone’s instruments, including their competitors. Their market leadership
position makes them ideal for promoting and underwriting their competitors’
adoption of this standard, creating a reason for established labs to invest in
upgrading to the next-generation equipment.

Finally, these opportunities convinced the instrument maker to strongly consider
a significant change in their business model by moving from selling individual
pieces of hardware to an incremental recurring revenue model to access new
software features. This would allow lab administrators to pay for precisely what
they needed in the lab, giving them substantially more cost-effective
flexibility.


STRATEGIC UX RESEARCH AFFECTS THE ENTIRE ORGANIZATION.

The research results proved it was highly desirable to make significant changes
in their products and how the organization delivered new services. The
executives saw the need to eliminate the existing organizational structure
because it created silos that prevented them from adopting their new approach.
Instead, they’d require a different organizational structure to shift to better
cross-instrument interoperability, common software architectures,
interconnectivity, and business models.

What started with a Strategic UX Research effort led to a significant
reorganization of the business units and the revenue model. The research
affected practically every aspect of the business. It provided insight into
innovations that would prove profitable for the next decade.

The executives of the scientific instrument manufacturer were now more
knowledgeable about the daily experiences of lab technicians and administrators.
This new knowledge would drive advances for years to come.

And more research would make the executives and senior stakeholders even more
knowledgeable. Critical business decisions like pricing changes or what to build
next would no longer be guesses. Instead, the executives would have a deep
understanding of their users to point them in the right direction.

Tactical UX Research won’t influence the organization as a whole. At best, it
makes incremental, minor improvements to a product or service. It takes
Strategic UX Research to drive change at an organizational level.


BECOMING THE EXPERTS ON THE USERS’ EXPERIENCE.

The primary objective of a Strategic UX Research program is to make everyone at
your organization the world’s foremost expert on who your users are and what
their experiences are like. So why should anyone else know more about using your
products and services than those working at your organization?

That expertise is almost impossible to gain one usability test or survey at a
time. Instead, it needs deep research methods to learn the subtleties of your
users’ daily experiences. Upgrading to these advanced research methods will take
some effort.

For most organizations, that means shifting the focus and energy from Tactical
UX Research methods to Strategic UX Research methods. Jen Cardello reported that
when she arrived at Fidelity Investments, she found that 85% of the ongoing
research was dedicated to Tactical UX Research.

Within a year, Jen shifted that to 85% Strategic UX Research work. The
improvement in the organization’s agility was dramatically noticeable. Teams
were now focused on ensuring they were solving the correct problems instead of
perfecting “solutions” that weren’t helping users in any way.


ARE YOU READY?

Many UX leaders we work with don’t realize their organization is struggling to
try to work without a Strategic UX Research program in place. Instead, they’re
so focused on keeping the treadmill going with their Tactical UX Research that
they don’t realize it’s keeping their executives and senior stakeholders from
seeing the value of great UX insights.

Strategic UX Research is the next big thing in UX leadership and how executives
and senior stakeholders make their organization’s most significant decisions. Is
your team ready for this shift? Have you started the transformation within your
organization to build a deep, shared understanding of users and their
experiences at the most senior levels?

The UX leaders starting this journey will see a complete shift in their
organization’s agility. They’ll see a dramatic improvement in the organization's
products and services.

More importantly, those UX leaders will realize how executives and senior
stakeholders will embrace becoming more human-centered. This transformation will
reduce the risks of making the wrong decisions by focusing on the expertise
they’ll gain when they have access to Strategic UX Research.

This is the opportunity the entire UX field has been waiting for. So let’s not
let it pass us by.

Published here on May 18, 2023.


ABOUT THE AUTHOR



Jared M. Spool is a co-founder of Center Centre and the founder of UIE. In 2016,
with Dr. Leslie Jensen-Inman, he opened Center Centre, a new design school in
Chattanooga, TN to create the next generation of industry-ready UX Designers.
They created a revolutionary approach to vocational training, infusing Jared’s
decades of UX experience with Leslie’s mastery of experience-based
learning methodologies.


HOW TO WIN STAKEHOLDERS & INFLUENCE DECISIONS PROGRAM

Gain the power skills you need to grow your influence on critical product
decisions.

Get mentored and coached by Jared Spool in a 16-week program.

Learn more about our How to Win Stakeholders & Influence Decisions program
today!


YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

 * What Proactive UX Research Looks Like by Jared M. Spool Proactive UX
   research anticipates the critical user experience decisions that a team
   faces. The team’s UX research effort uncovers sound findings and insights to
   ensure they make the best possible decisions…
 * A Radical Proposal: Put UX Research In Charge by Jared M. Spool This will
   sound radical. Bear with me on this. Product, Development, and Design should
   all report to UX Research. That’s right. We’re talking about a
   research-driven organization. Everyone in your…



↑ Top Navigation

 * Center Centre Programs
 * Articles

791 Turnpike Street, Unit 4
North Andover, MA 01845 USA
+1 978-327-5561

Center Centre is proud to provide you the expertise you need to deliver better
products and services.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Copyright 2023 Center Centre Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Notice


LET US INSPIRE YOU TO DO SOMETHING DIFFERENTLY IN YOUR DESIGN WORK.

Your Email