www.advisorhub.com
Open in
urlscan Pro
104.26.7.137
Public Scan
Submitted URL: https://send.advisorhub.com/l/i4TStL7HXAvFhaPKQKJdNr-ZG-528z6BgrQWHB3WxYE
Effective URL: https://www.advisorhub.com/firms-fire-high-risk-brokers-as-finra-takes-aim-at-rogue-actors/?utm_source=Pinpointe+-+News+Act...
Submission: On May 18 via api from CH — Scanned from DE
Effective URL: https://www.advisorhub.com/firms-fire-high-risk-brokers-as-finra-takes-aim-at-rogue-actors/?utm_source=Pinpointe+-+News+Act...
Submission: On May 18 via api from CH — Scanned from DE
Form analysis
2 forms found in the DOMGET https://www.advisorhub.com/
<form role="search" method="get" class="searchform form-inline" action="https://www.advisorhub.com/">
<div class="form-group">
<label class="sr-only screen-reader-text" for="s">Search for:</label>
<i class="fa fa-search search-icon" aria-hidden="true"></i>
<input class="form-control default" type="text" name="s" id="s" value="Search Keywords" onclick="if(this.value == 'Search Keywords'){this.value=''}" onblur="if(this.value == ''){this.value='Search Keywords'}">
<span class="input-group-btn">
<button class="btn searchGo" type="submit">
<i class="fa fa-arrow-right" aria-hidden="true"></i>
<span class="sr-only"> Search </span>
</button>
</span>
</div>
</form>
<form id="commentform" class="comment-form">
<iframe title="Comment Form"
src="https://jetpack.wordpress.com/jetpack-comment/?blogid=165023220&postid=153037&comment_registration=0&require_name_email=1&stc_enabled=1&stb_enabled=1&show_avatars=0&avatar_default=mystery&greeting=Leave+a+Reply&greeting_reply=Leave+a+Reply+to+%25s&color_scheme=light&lang=en_US&jetpack_version=10.7&show_cookie_consent=10&has_cookie_consent=0&token_key=%3Bnormal%3B&sig=e3c6ccf707f683c0e82d9e2c6fbc9fc0f2ab1949#parent=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.advisorhub.com%2Ffirms-fire-high-risk-brokers-as-finra-takes-aim-at-rogue-actors%2F%3Futm_source%3DPANTHEON_STRIPPED%26utm_medium%3DPANTHEON_STRIPPED%26utm_campaign%3DPANTHEON_STRIPPED"
name="jetpack_remote_comment" style="width: 100%; height: 60px; border: 0px;" class="jetpack_remote_comment" id="jetpack_remote_comment" sandbox="allow-same-origin allow-top-navigation allow-scripts allow-forms allow-popups" scrolling="no">
</iframe>
<!--[if !IE]><!-->
<script>
document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', function() {
var commentForms = document.getElementsByClassName('jetpack_remote_comment');
for (var i = 0; i < commentForms.length; i++) {
commentForms[i].allowTransparency = false;
commentForms[i].scrolling = 'no';
}
});
</script>
<!--<![endif]-->
</form>
Text Content
Skip to Main Content SUBMIT A TIP RECEIVE DAILY NEWS ACCOUNT Menu * News * * Latest News * * Allianz Fund Collapse Ends With Guilty Plea, $5.8 Billion Payout * * Finra Sets Year-End Deadline for More Flexible WFH Rules * * Firms Fire High Risk Brokers as Finra Takes Aim at Rogue Actors * * Bill Hwang Seeks Probe of Morgan Stanley in Costly Short Squeeze * Close * Advisor Moves * * Rockefeller Swipes $17-Mln Morgan Stanley Broker Out from Under First Republic * * Two UBS Teams with $16.5 Million in Combined Revenue Break Away in NYC * * Merrill Loses $536M Illinois Trio to Stifel, $350M New Jersey Duo to RIA * * West Coast Hoppers: UBS Loses $3.8M Duo to Ameriprise, $1M-Plus Producers to Sanctuary and Wells * Close * Enforcement * * Firms Fire High Risk Brokers as Finra Takes Aim at Rogue Actors * * Finra Suspends Ex-Morgan Stanley Broker Who Hyped ‘Exclusive’ Venture Capital Investment * * Finra Bans Ex-Ameriprise Broker Who “Falsified” $25K in Client Event Expenses * * Finra Sidelines Former Top-Ranked Next Gen Broker in PA Over Undisclosed Fundraising * Close * Markets * `Nothing Safer Than Cash’: Tech Rout Puts Silicon Valley on Edge * ‘Any News Is Bad News’ as Earnings Fail to Save Equity Bulls * ‘50 Cent’ Profited From Volatility Jump, Wells Fargo Says * ‘Beaten Down’ ETF Is a Way to Play Inverted Curve, BofA Says * Close * Opinion * * SIRIANNI: Morgan Stanley’s Moment * * Sirianni’s 2022 Predictions: The Year of The Great Entrepreneur Revival * * Why Only a Huge Shock Will Deter Risk-Taking Investors * * Sirianni: Toxic Culture * Close * Fintech News * * UBS “Committed” to Finishing Broker Workstation Revamp Despite Delays, CFO Says * * Wells Fargo Advisors Rolls Out eMoney Planning Tool for Brokers * * Fintech Firm Apex Clearing Agrees to Go Public Via SPAC * * Merrill Systems Hiccuped on Thursday as Stocks Slid * Close * From the Publisher * * SIRIANNI: Morgan Stanley’s Moment * Sirianni’s 2022 Predictions: The Year of The Great Entrepreneur Revival * * Tony Sirianni Interviews Ken Cella — Principal, Client Strategies Group at Edward Jones * Sirianni: Death of the Trainee * * Welcome to AdvisorHub RIA * From the Publisher: Sirianni’s Predictions for 2021 * * Seven Questions with Tony Sirianni: Josh Rogers, Founder and CEO, Arete Wealth * Seven Questions with Tony Sirianni: Phil Hildebrandt, Principal, CEO of Segall Bryant & Hamill * Close * Close * Deals & Comp * Recruiting Wire * Breakaway Center * Resources * * Resources Home * Boutique * * Fintech Product Directory * Fintech Resources * * Institute * Practice Management Resources * * Transition Resources * * Events * * Culture Survey * Close * AH TV * Podcasts * AH Magazine * RIA Center * Asset Manager Hub close X Search for: Search May 17, 2022 FIRMS FIRE HIGH RISK BROKERS AS FINRA TAKES AIM AT ROGUE ACTORS by Mason Braswell | Enforcement, News | FINRA | View Comments Share This SUBMIT A TIP Broker-dealers are in some cases firing brokers as the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority gears up to enforce a new rule targeting firms with a significant history of misconduct, a senior Finra official said on Tuesday. Those firms are proactively looking to avoid potentially falling under new obligations that would be imposed under Finra Rule 4111 if they, or their brokers, have surpassed thresholds for regulatory or investor-harming disclosures, according to Lance Burkett, senior director of retail risk monitoring at Finra. “We have heard and we have seen representatives being terminated at this point prepping for the rule,” Burkett said at a panel discussion about the rule broadcast from Finra’s Annual conference in Washington D.C. Rule 4111 took effect in January, but Finra’s first evaluation to determine which firms will qualify will take place in July. The data will be based on firms and their brokers’ disciplinary history as of June 1. Firms deemed to be higher risk could be forced to set aside funds to cover future regulatory issues or face additional restrictions on hiring, supervision or limits on product sales under the rule. More brokers could come under the microscope once Finra sends out early indicators to firms in June about how they rank. Firms that ultimately cross the thresholds in July will also have an opportunity to terminate brokers within 30 days to stay below the threshold. Kosha Dalal, an associate general counsel at Finra who helped craft the rule, said the intention is for those brokers who are terminated also to have a harder time finding a new home. “If a firm reduces staff to let go of a potentially high risk individual, we don’t want to have that individual just move to another firm,” Dalal said on the same panel. “We want to make sure that the firms are actively thinking about the individuals that they are onboarding.” In response to public feedback, Finra is also planning to propose to the Securities and Exchange Commission an amendment to the rule that would allow it to publicly disclose on firms’ BrokerCheck reports when the firm is subject to Rule 4111 restrictions, Dalal said. Burkett said that Finra expects only a “low portion” of its 3,400 member firms to ultimately qualify for restrictions, although the regulator has not run its evaluation yet so it does not have a precise estimate. Metrics will include firm size, and number of registered brokers it employs with prior disciplinary history as well as the number of arbitration and regulatory events against the firm itself. It also counts the number of brokers who have come from previously expelled firms. “Firms that have individuals who come from previously expelled firms have a higher likelihood of future misconduct,” Dalal said. “The statistics just bear it out.” Firms will also get a preliminary report indicating whether they are likely to qualify and must go through a multi-step process, including a consultation with Finra staff, before the regulator makes a final decision whether to add them to the restricted list. Finra will re-run its calculation annually. In its 2018 proposal, Finra said it identified over a prior five-year period 20 small firms employing 150 or fewer registered persons that had 30 or more disclosure events, ten mid-size firms with 45 such disclosures, and five large firms with 500 or more registered persons that had 750 or more disclosure events. The SEC approved the initial rule in July last year as academic studies indicated that brokers with a history of misconduct were likely to be repeat offenders. Investor advocates and members of congress had also raised concerns with Finra about firms that skirted payment of arbitration awards in customer harm cases. Dalal said Finra will take into account firm revenues, amount of insurance coverage it has, pending arbitration complaints and unpaid awards as part of its determination of the maximum cash deposit it could require. FINRA SETS YEAR-END DEADLINE FOR MORE FLEXIBLE WFH RULES The industry’s self regulator recently advanced four related proposals tied to remote supervision. May 17, 2022 In "News" SEC APPROVES FINRA’S DEPOSIT REQUIREMENT RULE FOR HIGH-RISK FIRMS But broker-dealers and brokers engaged in misconduct will often uncover ways, despite the new rule, to avoid the regulators’ grasp, a former enforcement lawyer predicted. Aug 3, 2021 In "Enforcement" FINRA BARS EX-EDWARD JONES BROKER AFTER CLIENT SAYS HE REFUSED TO RETURN $893K Edward Jones has reimbursed the client for losses, a spokesperson said. Apr 13, 2022 In "News" LIKE THIS ARTICLE? LET ADVISORHUB COME TO YOU! SIGN UP Share This Comments (2) * on May 17 2022, Paul says: biggest bad actors are the bigger firms that refuse to terminate high commission brokers that abuse clients because it would entangle thier high recruiting managers that through huge upfront bonuses stimulate overcharging clients to make these bonuses. Nothing is ever done to these brokers or their managers who also profit from this scheme unpess they lose big and cannot settle the client arbitrations which the firms try tp do to bury all these real client abise matters. Then to distract the regulators away from this behavior they make a big deal on minor omissions of internal firm rules judging and terminating brokers before them having a day in front of arbitration. Objective to seem to be doing a good compliance job while executing a sweep under the rug approach to the big client abuse cases. > Reply to Paul * on May 17 2022, The PoPo says: The biggest bad actors are at these small dink firms (see Ex-UBS Rep in Texas) .. — Scooping up fired brokers is the only reason third rate places like Stifel even exist. > Reply to The PoPo LEAVE A REPLY CANCEL REPLY * About Us * Contact Us * Advertise * Events * Careers GET OUR NEWSLETTER Industry focused content and breaking news. SIGN UP CONTACT US EMAIL US 1707 Post Oak Blvd. #484 Houston, TX 77056 © 2022 AdvisorHub * |Terms of Use * |Privacy Policy * |Advertise * |Careers * Facebook * Linkedin * Twitter Back to top