www.newyorker.com Open in urlscan Pro
151.101.192.239  Public Scan

Submitted URL: https://apple.news/PwfosC9VcNIVCYR00ZH79Br?campaign_id=E101&campaign_type=c103a19b-54a6-4374-994f-d61d61fa6883&crea...
Effective URL: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2022/01/03/dan-bongino-and-the-big-business-of-returning-trump-to-power
Submission: On January 10 via api from US — Scanned from DE

Form analysis 1 forms found in the DOM

Name: newsletterPOST

<form class="form-with-validation NewsletterSubscribeFormValidation-drAFnZ irxneZ" id="newsletter" name="newsletter" novalidate="" method="POST"><span class="BaseWrap-sc-TURhJ TextFieldWrapper-fzQmAh XKIjq eAiRiL text-field"
    data-testid="TextFieldWrapper__email"><label class="BaseWrap-sc-TURhJ BaseText-fFzBQt TextFieldLabel-gPTGiA eTiIvU hPdaTG ksGUHO text-field__label text-field__label--single-line" for="newsletter-text-field-email"
      data-testid="TextFieldLabel__email">
      <div class="BaseWrap-sc-TURhJ TextFieldLabelText-iYwLHd eTiIvU iZROLf">Enter your e-mail address</div>
      <div class="BaseWrap-sc-TURhJ TextFieldInputContainer-fva-dAv eTiIvU khqwQw"><input aria-describedby="privacy-text" aria-invalid="false" id="newsletter-text-field-email" required="" name="email" placeholder="Your e-mail address"
          class="BaseInput-jNjmrm TextFieldControlInput-dlkCbz cfTVp ixDFGW text-field__control text-field__control--input" type="email" data-testid="TextFieldInput__email" value=""></div>
    </label><button class="BaseButton-aWfgy ButtonWrapper-dOcxiw nICCJ bVtiRv button button--utility TextFieldButton-hEMtxo kclTsF" data-event-click="{&quot;element&quot;:&quot;Button&quot;}" data-testid="Button" type="submit"><span
        class="ButtonLabel-eBwykR kgbwGm button__label">Sign up</span></button></span>
  <div id="privacy-text" tabindex="-1" class="BaseWrap-sc-TURhJ NewsletterSubscribeFormDisclaimer-dgVOgx eTiIvU iwIJkH"><span>
      <p>By signing up, you agree to our <a href="https://www.condenast.com/user-agreement">User Agreement</a> and <a href="https://www.condenast.com/privacy-policy">Privacy Policy &amp; Cookie Statement</a>.</p>
    </span></div>
</form>

Text Content

Skip to main content

 * Newsletter

Story Saved

To revisit this article, select My Account, then View saved stories

Close Alert
Close
Sign In



Search
Search
 * News
 * Books & Culture
 * Fiction & Poetry
 * Humor & Cartoons
 * Magazine
 * Puzzles & Games
 * Video
 * Podcasts
 * Archive
 * Goings On
 * Shop

Open Navigation Menu
Menu
Story Saved

To revisit this article, visit My Profile, then View saved stories

Close Alert
Close


New Yorker Favorites
 * Growing Up in the Library
 * A Loaded Gun
 * The Height Gap
 * Pets Allowed
 * “Stone Mattress”


Profiles
January 3 & 10, 2022 Issue


DAN BONGINO AND THE BIG BUSINESS OF RETURNING TRUMP TO POWER

The Secret Service agent turned radio host is furious at liberals—so he’s trying
to build a right-wing media infrastructure in time for 2024.

By Evan Osnos

December 27, 2021
 * Facebook
 * Twitter
 * Email
 * Print
 * Save Story
   Save this story for later.


Bongino’s combative style has made him a star of talk radio, where he occupies
the time slot once held by Rush Limbaugh.Illustration by Zohar Lazar
 * Facebook
 * Twitter
 * Email
 * Print
 * Save Story
   Save this story for later.



CONTENT

This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

Dan Bongino, one of America’s most popular conservative commentators, lives in
the seaside city of Stuart, Florida, less than an hour from Mar-a-Lago, where
his friend Donald Trump bridles against a forced retirement. Every weekday from
noon to three—the coveted time slot once held by the late Rush Limbaugh—“The Dan
Bongino Show” goes live across the United States, beginning with an announcer’s
voice over the sound of hard-rock guitars: “From the N.Y.P.D. to the Secret
Service to behind the microphone, taking the fight to the radical left and the
putrid swamp.”

One day this fall, minutes before Bongino went on the air, he learned of an
unfolding drama that offered prime material: in New York, a live interview with
Vice-President Kamala Harris had been disrupted because two hosts of “The View”
tested positive for breakthrough cases of COVID-19. Bongino, who rails against
vaccine mandates and calls masks “face diapers,” announced to his audience,
“None of those seem to work on ‘The View.’ ” But, he said pointedly, he wasn’t
gloating—“unlike insane leftists, who wish death on me and everyone else from
COVID, because they’re legitimately crazy satanic demon people.”



Bongino draws an estimated 8.5 million radio listeners a week, making him the
fourth most listened to host in America, ahead of Mark Levin, Glenn Beck, and
other big names, according to Talkers magazine, which covers the industry.
Though he came to broadcasting only after three unsuccessful runs for Congress,
he now commands a Fox News program on Saturday nights, a podcast that has ranked
No. 1 on iTunes, and a Web site that repackages stories into some of the most
highly trafficked items on social media. In recent months, according to Facebook
data, his page has attracted more engagement than those of the Times, the
Washington Post, and the Wall Street Journal combined.

The history of broadcasting is replete with figures who play a combative
character on the air but shed the pose when they leave the studio. Bongino is
not among them. “For the fifteen-thousandth time, if you want to wear a mask,
knock yourself out, daddy-o,” he told me recently, after finishing his taping
for the day. “Whatever. You do you. This is what infuriates me: if you dare say
anything like ‘Hey, do those things actually work?,’ people are, like, ‘What the
fuck? You lunatic, heretic, you flat-earth son of a bitch! Kill this guy!’ ”

Bongino records at a desk adorned with a boxing bell, a judge’s gavel, and a
carved stone nameplate with the message “Be Strong Like a Rock!!!” His
aesthetics, visually and editorially, bespeak his political moment. Limbaugh,
the dominant conservative pundit for three decades, was a dedicated indoorsman,
with a physique that celebrated sybaritic contentment. Bongino, at forty-seven,
is six feet tall and muscle-bound, with a martial buzz cut and a trim goatee.
Like others in his cohort—including the podcaster Joe Rogan and the Infowars
host Alex Jones—he favors a wardrobe of tight T-shirts. He displays a tattoo on
his left biceps, and he often broadcasts with a facial expression that resembles
the angry emoji. Asked by a fan what he would do if he were not a political
commentator, Bongino said that he would compete in mixed martial arts.

After exhausting the Kamala Harris riff, Bongino turned to his main interest of
the day: “rigged” elections. For years, he has claimed that “deep state”
plotters and foreign entities sought to sabotage Trump in 2016, infiltrating his
campaign and leaking allegations about his dealings with Russia. (He parlayed
that theory into a book, “Spygate,” one of four briskly generated volumes that
bore Bongino’s name during Trump’s Presidency.) These days, his story line has
expanded to encompass President Joe Biden—a “disgraceful, disgusting, grotesque
bag of bones”—as well as his son Hunter. “The F.B.I. and the C.I.A., members of
it, unquestionably tried to rig both the 2016 and 2020 election,” Bongino told
his audience. In the latter, he explained, “they didn’t put out bad information
on someone—they hid information about Joe Biden and his corrupt son.”

 * Facebook
 * Twitter
 * Email
 * Shopping

Cartoon by Farley Katz

In Bongino’s world, it matters little that Trump’s claims of rampant fraud were
dismissed by his own top appointees at the Departments of Justice and Homeland
Security, as well as by federal and state judges. To the true believer, the lack
of solid evidence simply confirms how well hidden the rigging was. In the study
of conspiracy theories (a description Bongino rejects), this is known as
“self-sealing”: the theory mends holes in its own logic. “A corrupted
intelligence community, in conjunction with a corrupt media, will eat this
country like a cancer from the inside out,” Bongino told his audience, as he
built to a takeaway. “This is why I’m really hoping Donald Trump runs in 2024,”
he said. “He’s the best candidate suited to clean house. Because if we don’t
clean house the Republic is gone.”

Spend several months immersed in American talk radio and you’ll come away with
the sense that the violence of January 6th was not the end of something but the
beginning. A year after Trump supporters laid siege to the U.S. Capitol, some of
his most influential champions are preparing the ground for his return, and they
dominate a media terrain that attracts little attention from their opponents. As
liberals argue over the algorithm at Facebook and ponder the disruptive
influence of TikTok, radio remains a colossus; for every hour that Americans
listened to podcasts in 2021, they listened to six and a half hours of AM/FM
radio, according to Edison Research, a market-research and polling firm. Talk
radio has often provided more reliable hints of the political future than think
tanks and elected officials have. In 2007, even as the Republican leaders George
W. Bush and John McCain were trying to rebrand themselves as immigration
reformers, Limbaugh was advocating laws that would deny immigrants access to
government services and force them to speak English.

Seven out of ten Republicans want Trump to run again, according to a recent poll
by Politico and Morning Consult. Senior Party leaders perpetuate his fraudulent
claims about the 2020 election; in a Fox News interview, Representative Steve
Scalise, the No. 2 House Republican, refused to acknowledge the legitimacy of
the result. Trump associates have risked jail time in order to thwart a
congressional inquiry into the attempt to overturn the vote. At the state level,
an unprecedented effort is sidelining Trump’s opponents and rewriting laws to
give partisans control over the administration of elections. On America’s
balkanized airwaves, his supporters are using their platforms to spread
disinformation, undermine faith in governance, and inflame his followers.



No one in American media has profited more from the Trump era and its aftermath
than Bongino. Since 2015, he has gone from hosting a fledgling podcast in his
basement to addressing audiences of millions. Pete Hegseth, a fellow Fox News
host who served in the National Guard, told me, “I carried a rifle in the
military, and now I get to serve in information warfare.” Bongino, he added, “is
one of our generals.” This vision of cultural combat is prominent in Trumpworld.
Alex Jones, who named his conspiratorial media brand Infowars, uses the motto
“There’s a war on for your mind!”

Video From The New Yorker

Jon Stewart on Trump, Cancel Culture, and Optimism



Trump has fostered a crop of broadcasters who owe their power to him, men like
Sebastian Gorka, the former White House aide, and Charlie Kirk, the founder of
Turning Point USA. Brian Rosenwald, the author of the history “Talk Radio’s
America,” has noted the triumph of ideology over experience. “Bongino is
speaking to the people who believe Trump’s press releases, who see the world
caving in and Biden as a raging socialist,” he told me. Rosenwald likens
Bongino’s ascent to that of Marjorie Taylor Greene, of Georgia, who reached
Congress in 2021, despite having voiced belief in a “global cabal of
Satan-worshipping pedophiles” and other delusions associated with QAnon. “Back
in the day, Marjorie Taylor Greene would have been consigned to the worst
committees, buried by the leadership,” he said. “But the old rules of how you
gain stature are out the door.”

Angelo Carusone, the president of Media Matters, a nonprofit group that tracks
and criticizes the conservative press, said that the field is changing for the
first time since the nineteen-nineties, when Limbaugh, Fox News, and the blogger
Matt Drudge established dominance. “They created the guidelines that people
walked along for decades,” Carusone said. But Limbaugh is gone, and Drudge and
Fox face more radical competitors. “The new information ecosystem is taking
shape over the next year or two, and whatever shakes out is going to set the
path for years to come.”

In the long run, Bongino’s most significant impact may not come from what he
says on his broadcasts. “My goal is for my content to be the least interesting
thing I did,” he told me. He has used his money and his influence to foster
technology startups, such as Parler, Rumble, and AlignPay, that are friendly to
right-wing views. These companies are intended to withstand traditional pressure
campaigns, including advertising boycotts like the one that Media Matters
prompted in 2019, based on old radio interviews in which the Fox host Tucker
Carlson described women as “extremely primitive” and Iraqis as “monkeys.”
Carusone said, “What scares me about Bongino is that this guy could end up
owning or controlling or directly building the infrastructure that
operationalizes a whole range of extremism.” He continued, “There used to be
lines. You could say, ‘O.K., PayPal, don’t let the January 6th people recruit
money to pay for buses.’ This new alternative infrastructure is not going to
stop that.” If another uprising organizes online, he said, “there will be a
whiplash effect. Everyone will say, ‘How did that happen?’ Well, it’s been
happening.”

After Bongino’s monologue about the intelligence community, he moved on to
another case for skepticism of American elections. In Arizona, he informed his
audience, a “forensic audit,” launched by Trump supporters who were certain that
his loss there was fraudulent, had delivered bad news: Biden received even more
votes than originally counted. Bongino urged his listeners to remain doubtful.
“The numbers may be correct, but who was behind the numbers?” he asked.

Encouraging this way of thinking is a reliable business bet; suspicion is an
appetite that is never fully sated. And, as any gun-shop owner knows, certain
enterprises thrive when customers feel vulnerable. “The liberals are the Man,”
Bongino told his audience in August. “They run big corporations. They run
YouTube. They run Facebook. They run the government. We’re the real misfits,
we’re the real rebels now.”




On any given afternoon, Bongino might read advertisements for survivalist food
rations (“Act now, and your order will be shipped quickly and discreetly to your
door in unmarked boxes”) and shotguns and massage chairs and filet mignon and
holsters—“custom-molded to fit your exact firearm for a quick, smooth draw.” In
between, he supplies listeners with a tight rotation of political hits—a jab at
the “PINO” (“President in name only”), followed by a savaging of the press
(“Don’t ever call me a journalist, that’s an insult”)—interspersed with
dispatches from the culture wars (a ruckus over the use of “JEDI” as an acronym
for “justice, equality, diversity, and inclusion,” which prompted Bongino to
cry, “They can’t cancel ‘Star Wars’!”). The effect is a meandering tour through
politics and combat and commerce, led by a combustible guide. Brian Murphy, a
former gubernatorial candidate in Maryland who advised Bongino’s first campaign
for Congress, in 2012, said that Bongino had a “bare-knuckle style.” He added,
half in jest, “Dan will debate you, and then he’ll go rip a phone book in half.”

While Trump thunders and plots from Palm Beach, Bongino does the daily work of
sustaining the faithful. On a show this fall, he read a listener’s question: “In
the event that Trump does get reëlected in 2024, what has he learned from his
first go-round of draining the swamp?” Bongino had a ready answer. “They tried
to take kind of a ‘Team of Rivals’ Lincoln approach,” by appointing Republicans
who had not been among Trump’s original supporters, he said. “That was clearly a
mistake. They backstabbed him. The John Boltons and others.” That wouldn’t
happen again, he vowed.

Expanding on the idea days later, Bongino told his audience, “The key to
understanding Trumpworld is understanding who the loyalists are and getting the
grifters out. And, sadly, there are a lot of grifters who pretend to like the
President, because there’s a check in it for them.” (The late Representative
Steve LaTourette, an Ohio Republican, described how this impulse arose in the
G.O.P. in an essay from 2014: “The grifting wing of the party promises that you
can have ideological purity—that you don’t have to compromise—and, of course,
all you have to do is send them money to make it happen.”) Bongino discourages
any doubt about whether he likes President Trump. During a Fox News segment in
December, when his colleague Geraldo Rivera described the events of January 6th
as “a riot that was unleashed, incited, and inspired by the President,” Bongino
accused him of disloyalty, saying, “The backstabbing of the President you’re
engaging in is really disgusting.”



Jennifer Mercieca, a professor of rhetoric at Texas A. & M., analyzed the
information warfare of the Trump era in her book “Demagogue for President,” and
catalogued some of the ascendant patterns of communication. There was
“paralipsis,” emphasizing something by professing to say little of it (“I’m not
going to call Jeb Bush ‘low energy’ ”), and the ad populum appeal, flattering a
crowd by praising its wisdom (“The people, my people, are so smart”). When
possible, Trump turned to the power of “reification,” applying nonhuman
sobriquets to his opponents (“disgusting animals,” “anchor babies,” “pigs”).
Aldous Huxley recognized that tactic as long ago as 1936, writing, “The
propagandist’s purpose is to make one set of people forget that certain other
sets of people are human.”

 * Facebook
 * Twitter
 * Email
 * Shopping

Cartoon by Roz Chast

Mercieca describes Bongino as “an important node in the amplification of
propaganda.” She told me, “Propaganda used to be primarily vertical, in the
sense that it came from the state or some authority, and it was distributed down
to everyone through one-way channels of communication. But, in the current
moment, propaganda has become horizontal, too.”

Life in the wilderness has imposed certain rhetorical adaptations on the Trump
movement. Bongino, like other prominent supporters, seems to put increasing
stock in what researchers refer to as “blue lies,” the kinds of claims that pull
believers together and drive skeptics away. (“There were known issues with the
election,” he said in December, adding, “We get that.”) Bongino is also adept at
the “accusation in a mirror” approach—co-opting the language and strategies of
his opponents. (He often endorses “defunding components of the F.B.I.” and
maintains that “misinformation comes almost exclusively from the left.”)

Nothing, though, has proved more potent than the constant regeneration of fear.
The day after Bongino riffed about the Arizona audit, he told podcast listeners
that liberals are happy when conservative vaccine skeptics get sick. “These
people want you dead,” he said, and offered a call to action. “The activism has
to be dialled up times ten. These people are crazy. More in a minute, but
first . . .” His baritone shifted into commercial mode. “Science tells us the
best way to achieve and maintain consistent, quality deep sleep is by lowering
core body temperature.” After sharing a few words about the makers of a luxury
cool-mesh mattress topper, he advised Americans to “head on over to
chilisleep.com/Bongino.”

For as long as broadcasters have had access to radio waves, they have tested
their extraordinary power to unite and divide. In the nineteen-thirties, as
President Franklin Roosevelt was boosting his popularity through the intimacy of
fireside chats, the nativist Charles Coughlin was reaching as much as a quarter
of the American populace with tirades against “godless capitalists, the Jews,
Communists, international bankers and plutocrats.”

But it took a revolution, of sorts, to establish many of the techniques we see
today. At first, according to “Something in the Air,” Marc Fisher’s history of
radio, stations emphasized variety, and avoided playing the same song twice in
twenty-four hours. Then, in 1950, a young station owner in Nebraska named Todd
Storz started to study listener preferences, perusing research by the University
of Omaha and, as the story goes, staking out the jukebox at a local diner. He
discovered that, even if people claimed to want variety, they tended to choose
the same songs over and over. In 1951, Storz introduced a two-hour hit parade—a
finite, repeated list of songs—and by the end of the year his station’s market
share had grown tenfold. Storz’s method became known as Top Forty, though d.j.s
discovered that they did not need forty songs to keep listeners engaged. “If
they quietly cut their lists down to thirty or even twenty-five songs, the
audience numbers responded immediately,” Fisher writes.

Repetition, as every cheerleader and every dictator learns, trains the neural
networks to make some thoughts more durable than others. “The more we hear
something, the more ‘sticky’ it becomes,” Mercieca said. “If we see something a
lot, then it feels true.” Until the eighties, though, radio stations were forced
to avoid too much repetition in political coverage; the Federal Communications
Commission had a “fairness doctrine” that required equal airtime for competing
views on major public issues. In 1987, during the Reagan Administration, the
F.C.C. stopped enforcing the doctrine. The next year, a college dropout and
former Top Forty d.j. named Rush Hudson Limbaugh III introduced his talk show to
a national audience.




New technologies provided an ambitious host with unprecedented reach: satellite
transmission allowed a single broadcaster access to hundreds of stations, and
toll-free calling let listeners across the country hear their own voice on air.
Limbaugh’s show became the cultural standard-bearer of American conservatism.
William F. Buckley, Jr., an early mentor, effectively ceded the floor in 1993,
when his magazine National Review hailed Limbaugh on the cover as “The Leader of
the Opposition.” Talk radio made Limbaugh wealthy—at his peak, he earned about
eighty-five million dollars a year—and he didn’t obscure the fact that his
strongest motivation was financial. When the biographer Zev Chafets visited him
at his manse in Florida (twenty-four thousand square feet, with a salon
decorated to resemble Versailles), Limbaugh told him, “Conservatism didn’t buy
this house. First and foremost I’m a businessman. My first goal is to attract
the largest possible audience so I can charge confiscatory ad rates.”

Other d.j.s, including Don Imus, Howard Stern, and Glenn Beck, migrated from
music broadcasts to talk radio, bringing with them a pop sensibility. At Talkers
magazine, the editor, Michael Harrison, created a weekly list of hot topics—a
hit parade of politics. “The similarity between Top Forty and commercial talk
radio has been profound,” he told me. “Certain topics get the phones to ring.
Certain topics are boring but important, so they stay away from them.” Even
though Limbaugh saw himself as an agent of commerce, his political identity
proved so profitable that it left a permanent imprint on the industry. The new
generation of radio conservatives—Sean Hannity, Mike Pence, Mark Levin—devoted
more attention to ideology than to show biz. “They still want to be
entertaining, but entertainment is not as big a deal,” Harrison said. “These are
people who are doing political content on broadcasting platforms, as opposed to
doing broadcasting with a political aspect.”



Broadcasters no longer need to cater to what Limbaugh called the “largest
possible audience.” Thanks to social media, they can thrive with a narrow, deep
gully of fans, who follow everything that comes out. “The ad agencies are
looking to get the best bang for their buck, and with social media you can more
specifically target your buys,” Harrison said. One of the ads on Bongino’s show
is for the Hidden Wealth Solution, a service that offers to help “boomers and
retirees” learn “how to protect your retirement from Socialism.”

With little incentive to widen his appeal beyond avowed loyalists, Bongino sees
limited value in traditional media. When I first contacted him for this article,
he agreed to phone conversations but declined to meet in person; because I’m a
contributor to CNN, he assumed that our interviews were a zero-sum proposition.
In one of our calls, I asked why he was bothering to talk to me at all. “I at
least get my say in there,” he said. “The reality is, I’ve got a bigger
footprint than you guys by tenfold, if not twentyfold. I don’t want to be an
asshole about it, but there’s nothing you can write that I can’t write back even
worse. It’s asymmetric warfare. You’ll never win.”

Later, when The New Yorker sent Bongino a memo to confirm facts for this
article, he responded that it contained “obviously false material,” but declined
to identify specifics. On his podcast the next day, he complained that I was
portraying him as a hatemonger. “Maybe have a little bit of personal dignity,”
he suggested, “you ass-kissing-Biden,
surgically-attaching-your-lips-to-the-ass-of-the-Administration piece of
garbage.”

In 1971, in the prehistoric age of talk radio, the novelist Stanley Elkin
published “The Dick Gibson Show,” which conjured the powers of an ambitious,
protean host. The fictional Gibson conducted his audiences through crescendos of
outrage and grief and paranoid self-pity, drawing in callers from across the
country—“wild visionaries” who “believed in the Loch Ness Monster, the
Abominable Snowman and the Communist Conspiracy.” The persona that made Gibson
effective, Elkin wrote, was the “sum of private frequencies and personal
resonances.”

“Can’t we just do this online?”
 * Facebook
 * Twitter
 * Email
 * Shopping

Cartoon by Mick Stevens

In the stories that Bongino reveals about himself, there are some of the usual
private frequencies: status, grit, yearning, humiliation. But nothing rings
louder than his awareness of fear—how it arises and subsides, what it does to
the body and the mind. In his punditry, Bongino talks about fear all the time.
“Fear has always been the Democrats’ coin of the realm,” he told podcast
listeners in June. “How else are they going to coax you into delivering them
your civil liberties and freedom? They do it through things like coronavirus.”
In a mock orator’s voice, he said, “Give up your right to assemble!”

When Bongino talks about his early life, he also lingers on fear. He grew up in
Queens and Long Island, with two brothers. His father, John, was a plumber and a
building inspector; his mother, Judy, worked at a grocery store. (For a time,
Bongino wanted to be a doctor. “Remember Charlie Brown encyclopedias?” he asked
me. “My favorite one was the biology one. It showed the muscle and heart, and I
must’ve read that, seriously, twenty times.” He went on, “I know a lot of
lefties who read this will probably laugh, because they all think we’re
cretins.”) When he was about nine, his parents split, and Judy began a
relationship with a man known as Big Mike, a dockworker and a former boxer, who
Bongino says would drink and assault him and his brother Joseph. “The abuse
became a familiar routine,” he wrote, in “Life Inside the Bubble,” a memoir from
2013. “Joseph and I never discussed it. No one did. We all just pretended it
didn’t happen and the world was happy to acquiesce.” (Big Mike could not be
reached for comment.)

When I asked about Big Mike, Bongino said, “The only thing that scared this guy
was the cops.” He took to restraining the abuse by calling the police. “It
became almost Pavlovian in its association to me. Where you’d go from this point
of maximum trauma in your life, I mean maximum trauma, pupils dilated, heart
racing, fear. I’m not talking about fear like you’re watching a horror movie. I
mean, when you’re a kid you can’t process fear. You think you’re next. That’s
not the kind of thing you have the adult faculties to deal with. It’s
traumatizing. And it changes you forever,” he said. “To go from that to ‘O.K.,
everything’s good now,’ I can’t even describe to you the elation. It’s literally
indescribable. I just remember the feeling being like a light switch: the fear
turned off. I thought, I want to do that. I want that kid to look at me like
that.”

In 1995, he entered a cadet program for aspiring police officers, while studying
psychology at Queens College. He became a cop, and also earned a master’s degree
in psychology. Soon, though, he was craving “something bigger.” In 1999, he
entered the U.S. Secret Service, and when Hillary Clinton ran for the Senate
that year Bongino was assigned to help protect her. He received, as he put it
later, “a Ph.D.-level course in campaign management.” In particular, he
appreciated the canny efforts of Clinton’s aides to insure that she was
photographed travelling in a frumpy brown van, which the Secret Service agents
nicknamed Scooby-Doo. (He invoked that lesson years later when he was running
for office, telling his staff that campaigns come down to “sound bites and
snapshots.”) Among colleagues, he was known as a skillful agent—well liked by
both peers and superiors, and quick to venture out in the middle of the night if
asked for help. An agent who worked with him recalled, “Nobody knew his politics
at all. He never talked politics.”




In 2001, Bongino met Paula Martinez, a Web developer at the Securities Industry
Association, and they got married a couple of years later. (Today, they have two
daughters, and Paula oversees much of Bongino’s business operation.) In 2006,
having moved to Maryland, he joined the Secret Service detail that guarded
George W. Bush and his family, and learned the byways of Presidential service.
(One rule: Never initiate a conversation with the President.) After Obama was
elected, Bongino drew the high-stakes job of organizing his protection during
the walking portion of the Inaugural parade, and worked for him for about two
years. In 2011, Bongino said of Obama, “From what I saw, he was a wonderful
father and a wonderful man, and he was very, very nice and very kind to me.”



Even in the prime postings of the Secret Service, Bongino was restless. He
invented a product for martial-arts practitioners—a sock with a sticky sole,
which he called the GrappleSock—and he and Paula sold it online. Reviving his
childhood ambitions, he crammed for the MCAT and applied to medical school at
the University of Oklahoma. Because his brother-in-law had worked there, he
said, “I thought I stood a good shot.” He was rejected. Instead, he enrolled in
an M.B.A. program at Penn State and completed it in his off-hours.

By then, Bongino had started paying attention to the cable-news channels that
played constantly in the office. He asked a colleague, “What do you listen to on
the way home, the Sports Junkies?” The colleague said, “No, I listen to this guy
Mark Levin.” Bongino began tuning in and was captivated. “I was, like, ‘Man,
this guy’s speaking my language. He’s as furious about things as I am.’ ”

In 2011, Bongino quit the Secret Service, sick of the travel and what he called
the “ ‘cocktail party’ managerial class.” He entered an uphill race against the
U.S. senator Ben Cardin, a longtime Maryland Democrat. During the campaign,
Bongino’s brother Joseph, who had also joined the Secret Service, was implicated
in a scandal in which several agents hired prostitutes while on a Presidential
visit to Colombia. According to the Washington Post, Joseph Bongino had a
one-night stand, but kept his job because he did not pay for sex. (Joseph
declined to comment for this article.) In Dan Bongino’s view, the case was bound
up with matters of class and status. “I assure you, if the same level of
investigative scrutiny was applied to the White House staff members conducting
advance work as was applied to the Secret Service, the results would not be
flattering,” he wrote in his memoir.

The race ended badly for Bongino—he lost by nearly thirty points—but it cemented
his contact with powerful Republicans, including Sarah Palin, who had endorsed
him. Within months, he had become a frequent guest on Infowars. For Alex Jones,
it was a perfect pairing: he could present Bongino as a defector from the White
House (“They’re so scared of him and what he knows”), and Bongino could play the
role of a reluctant but brave truth-teller. In appearances, he said that the
American public was being “manipulated” by a “tyrannical group of insiders.”
Over time, Bongino’s estimation of Obama changed from “a wonderful man” to “the
most corrupt president in U.S. history.” To the Secret Service agent who had
worked with him, he seemed transformed by the business that he had entered:
“It’s the tale of two Dan Bonginos—the agent and the politico.”

Bongino was honing an ethos that would serve him well: as he put it, “Everybody
loves behind-the-scenes stories.” He rarely finishes a show without touting a
revelation from behind the scenes—any scenes. Publicizing his book in 2013, he
described himself to ABC News as being “in the room during some of the most
important conversations”—even though Secret Service agents told ABC that they do
not sit in on high-level meetings. In a Washington Post column, Ed Rogers, a
veteran of the Reagan and George H. W. Bush Administrations, derided Bongino for
capitalizing on his duty in the Presidential detail. “Gag me,” Rogers wrote.
“The author should ask for forgiveness, go live in a monastery for a few years
and then permanently drop out of sight.”

Instead, Bongino found his way to a more defiant corner of the Republican world,
aided by Virginia Thomas, the wife of the Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.
A prominent Tea Party activist, Ginni Thomas ran a government-affairs firm,
Liberty Consulting, and described her work as a “fight for our country’s life.”
In 2013, she and a number of prominent conservatives, who believed that they
were losing a messaging war against progressives, started meeting to develop
talking points. The group, which included congressional staff and reporters at
right-leaning publications, was called Groundswell. Members maintained a Google
Group, where they swapped proposed phrases. After they workshopped an attack on
Obama for putting “politics over public safety,” the phrase became the theme of
articles published by the Washington Times, RedState.com, and Breitbart, the
last of which Bongino promoted with a tweet: “Politics over public safety?”

Bongino told me that Thomas is a “good friend,” who has encouraged him toward
more intense activism: “She says all the time, ‘Dan, we’re the leaders we’ve
been waiting for.’ Everybody is waiting for this white knight to come and save
the day, but it’s not going to happen. We’re the ones.” For a while, though, he
seemed uncertain how to effect the changes he wanted to see. In 2015, after
narrowly losing another run for Congress, Bongino fashioned a podcasting studio
out of moving blankets at his home in suburban Maryland. He was appearing
occasionally on larger conservative shows, which helped build his audience. But
he wasn’t yet done trying for public office. That summer, he and Paula bought a
house in Florida, not far from where her mother lived, and Bongino launched a
third run for Congress. This time, he failed to make it out of the Republican
primary, and was noticed mostly for a conflict with a Politico reporter, which
became public when a telephone interview was leaked. As the reporter pressed him
on campaign donations and on his motives for running, Bongino exploded. He
called him a “fucking coward,” speculated that he got beat up a lot as a kid,
and threatened to “expose your fucking ass.”

“I don’t think he has properly adjusted to his new circumstances.”
 * Facebook
 * Twitter
 * Email
 * Shopping

Cartoon by Frank Cotham

Later, looking back on his electoral career, Bongino acknowledged that he “got
smoked,” but said that it was “probably the best thing that ever happened to
me.” He was better off behind the scenes—as a broadcaster who could help the
right candidate win office. In the summer of 2016, Trump was the Republican
nominee for President. Bongino, a proud fellow-product of Queens, appreciated
his sensibility. “Queens kids never had money like the Manhattan kids,” he told
a local magazine in Florida. “But there’s always puffery. Everything’s huge,
magnificent—even if it’s not and your car’s 10 years old.” In 2018, Bongino
landed a show on NRATV, an online video channel run by the National Rifle
Association, on which he often echoed Trump’s complaints about a “witch hunt”
and the “biggest scandal in American history.” Trump, recognizing a reliable
supporter, began promoting Bongino’s endeavors on Twitter. (“Thank you Dan and
good luck with the book!”) In September, 2018, as political leaders were
gathering for John McCain’s funeral, Trump was tweeting about Bongino’s latest
appearance on Fox.

NRATV closed down in 2019, but Bongino had found his most effective register:
existential showdown. In a segment about the confirmation battle over the
Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Bongino called it “pure unadulterated
evil, what they did to this guy.” He announced a new sense of vocation: “My
entire life right now is about owning the libs.”

In broadcasting, one marker of status is the ability to do your job without
leaving home. Hannity often does television from his house on Long Island;
Carlson has a studio in Maine, where his family has summered for decades, and
another near his house in Florida. When Bongino spoke at the Conservative
Political Action Conference last February, he said, “I don’t get out of my house
much.”

For a promotional event in 2018, Bongino and his wife signed in from a couch at
their home in Florida. He spent an hour autographing books to send to fans,
while Paula—a composed presence in a black dress and chunky glasses—read
questions that supporters had submitted. “How do you handle the frustrations you
encounter daily?” she asked. Bongino replied, “Who said I handle them?” He
barked a laugh and turned to the camera: “You’re not aware of my notoriously
horrible temper and disposition?”



Bongino credits his wife with fine-tuning what he calls “the product.” When Bill
from New Jersey asked, “Have you always been this competitive and passionate?,”
Bongino explained that Paula keeps track of which topics inspire the greatest
surges in engagement. “She’ll be, like, ‘Dude, you are slaying it today,’ ” he
said. “Because she has these metrics on the Excel spreadsheet.”

Social-media algorithms rely on the principle that Internet momentum is
self-justifying: if something is popular, it deserves to be more popular.
Bongino has learned to capitalize on this tendency. Across his shows and Web
sites, a small staff of editors and producers—he declined to say how many—help
him trawl right-wing sites and accounts for videos and sound bites and news
items that will furnish the ingredients of social-media arousal.




In December, 2019, he started a business to maximize that power: the Bongino
Report, a news aggregator designed to lure Trump supporters away from the Drudge
Report. Matt Drudge had soured on Trump, and Bongino seized the opportunity.
“Drudge has abandoned you. I NEVER will,” he tweeted.

The Bongino Report completed what Carusone, of Media Matters, described as an
“engagement machine”—a suite of businesses across broadcast and mobile
technology that introduce large audiences to themes that were previously
obscure. “Bongino understood that if you’re connected to the fever swamps you
can pull together raw material that differentiates you and gets high
engagement,” he said. “He takes the right kernel of highly charged, emotional
content, with the right headline, and reaches a large enough platform.”

The process is a kind of “narrative laundering,” Jennifer Mercieca said. “You
start with a story from a tainted source, like Alex Jones, and then you process
it through something that is more trusted. People may not have trusted Alex
Jones and his information in 2015, but, when they heard a Republican nominee or
a President say it, then it sounded way more legit.” It benefits the launderer,
too, she added; when heavy Internet users hear him refer to the latest trend,
they feel “dialled in to the cusp of the information wars.”

The growth of Black Lives Matter protests in 2020 gave Bongino a chance to tout
his background in law enforcement. (“I spent four years with the N.Y.P.D. and
twelve years with the Secret Service. I didn’t have one civilian complaint.”)
Between April and October, engagement with his posts on Facebook rose nearly six
hundred per cent, according to an analysis by Yunkang Yang, a researcher at the
George Washington University’s Institute for Data, Democracy & Politics. The
most striking increase, Yang said, came just after the killing of George Floyd.
A post from Bongino.com amplified content from a smaller right-wing site called
the National Pulse, which showed footage of a Black man at a rally in
Washington, saying that he was ready to put “police in the fucking grave.”
Bongino’s team added a brief commentary, suggesting that the sentiment was
widespread: “This is what the Left is. . . . They personify hatred and embody
divisiveness. We can never let these people anywhere near power.” The post
generated more than a hundred and forty thousand likes and comments.

Before long, Bongino’s posts were consistently in the top ten on Facebook. His
competitor Ben Shapiro reportedly achieves big numbers by running a network of
pages that disseminates his content—the social-media equivalent of buying your
own book to get on the best-seller list—but Bongino denies employing such
tricks.

His fans follow him closely. In the fall of 2020, an oncology nurse and admirer
spotted a lump on Bongino’s neck during a video appearance and encouraged him to
get it checked. He was diagnosed as having Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Doctors removed a
seven-centimetre tumor, and he underwent chemotherapy and radiation. In March,
he was pronounced cancer-free, a development that generated fervent engagement
on Facebook.

“It’s kinda fun, but only for, like, a minute.”
 * Facebook
 * Twitter
 * Email
 * Shopping

Cartoon by Adam Douglas Thompson

Because Bongino has emerged so fast, and because so much of his activity occurs
away from mainstream media, few Democrats have noticed that he exists. Carusone
notes that there is an entire realm of influential figures who are effectively
invisible from the outside. “They’re no longer the fringe,” he said. He points
to Steven Crowder, a thirty-four-year-old YouTuber who often broadcasts wearing
a gun in a shoulder holster. YouTube has cited Crowder for “egregious”
violations of its policies on disinformation and cyberbullying; last spring, it
suspended his ad sales, and reportedly penalized him for “reveling in or
mocking” the police killing of a Black teen-ager in Ohio. (He disputed the
accusation.) In October, 2020, as the election approached, his YouTube channel
had more viewers than CNN’s did.

In the days following the election, conservative hosts jockeyed for attention,
but Bongino outperformed his peers. A headline in Politico declared, “Dan
Bongino Leads the MAGA Field in Stolen-Election Messaging.” Like others, he
often charged toward a red line—incitement, libel, bullying—and then veered
away. On November 9th, in a podcast episode titled “Resist,” he said, “I’ve
never been more fired up. We need a rally and we need the President at it.” Then
it was time to hedge. “There will be no riots at that rally,” he went on. “The
safest place on earth for police officers is at a Trump rally.” That day,
Bongino’s podcast became No. 1 on iTunes.

In tweets, there was less room to hedge. On November 11th, he wrote that
conservatives were being “put on targeting lists” and that his opponents were
“tyrants, nothing more.” Less than a week later, he wrote, “The mask is off.
They’re not hiding anymore.” One of the people reading, according to an analysis
by National Public Radio, was Ashli Babbitt, a devoted Trump fan from Southern
California. On January 6th, she was killed by police while trying to storm the
Capitol. In the last year of her life, Babbitt retweeted Bongino at least fifty
times.



In the months since the siege, Bongino has condemned the violence but has taken
to warning conservatives of a new risk: political profiling. “I’m not suggesting
to you we shouldn’t investigate, to the moon, attacks on police officers,” he
told his audience in June. But he mapped out a dark hypothetical: “A certain
candidate runs for office they don’t like—all of a sudden the F.B.I. is
investigating ‘white supremacy.’ ‘He talked to a guy who knew a guy who talked
to a guy who was on Capitol Hill January 6th.’ ‘White supremacy’! You see where
this can go?”

In May, he started the radio show in Limbaugh’s old slot. It was not a simple
inheritance; some local stations opted to fill the slot with other aspiring
heirs. There was the duo of Clay Travis and Buck Sexton, a sportswriter and a
former C.I.A. officer; there was also Erick Erickson, an evangelical Christian
who once called the Supreme Court Justice David Souter a “goat-fucking child
molester,” and was now being positioned as the calm, mature option.

But Bongino had an advantage: Trump, who agreed to be his first guest. Bongino
asked if he would run in 2024, saying, “We need you.” Trump basked in the
question. “Well, I’ll tell you what,” he said. “We are going to make you very
happy, and we’re going to do what’s right.”

During the summer, Bongino added a new topic to his rotation. After months of
fanning listeners’ distrust about the election of 2020, he began prepping them
to doubt the integrity of an election that was still more than a year away.
“They’re hiding information from you now about what happened in Arizona and
Georgia,” he said in July, in a riff about Silicon Valley. “They disrupted the
2020 election. And they want to do it in 2022.”

When Trump was in office, his media allies played the role of interpreters,
defending his actions and his non-actions and distributing blame to enemies—the
press, China, Anthony Fauci. Under Biden, they no longer have to play defense;
these days, it’s offense all the time. By the fall of 2021, as the Biden
Administration sought to force companies to mandate COVID vaccines or weekly
testing, Bongino was forthrightly calling for “mass civil disobedience.”

On October 18th, Bongino issued a public ultimatum to Cumulus Media, the owner
of the network that syndicates his program, threatening to part ways with the
company if it continued to require employees to get vaccinated. “I don’t believe
this is based on any science,” he said on his show. He called it “antithetical
to everything I believe in.”

For Bongino, the policies of the pandemic—mandates for masks and vaccines,
admonitions against experimental treatments—have always rested on a dubious
expectation of trust. When I asked him why he challenged the science, he cut in:
“Time out.” He fed my words back to me: “ ‘You challenge the science.’ No,
that’s not the way science works! Science is a process of challenges.” He went
on, “What are you, a lemming? Just because people tell you to do things doesn’t
mean you should automatically do it. Pregnant women took thalidomide for morning
sickness. That was the consensus of the time. Look how that worked out.”

Bongino does not dispute the lethality of COVID. Before I could ask whether he
was vaccinated, he volunteered that he was. Citing his treatment for lymphoma,
he said, “I have a wiped-out immune system. My doctor told me, ‘This, for you,
is probably a good idea.’ ” He saw no conflict between his need for a vaccine
and his tirades against mandates. “I go on my show and say, ‘Hey, I took it. But
I really think you all should talk to your doctor first.’ ” In fact, some of his
on-air rhetoric was considerably more forceful. “The reason the left is doubled-
and tripled-down on vaccine mandates—it’s not by accident—is because the left
has a totalitarian bent,” he told listeners. “They don’t want you to have
control over any sphere of your life.”




Once Bongino picked the fight with Cumulus, his show went on hiatus. It did not
go as he had hoped. Another right-wing Cumulus host, Dale Jackson, mocked him
for “virtue signalling”; local stations griped about having to play reruns; the
trade press quoted speculation that Bongino was using the fracas as a ploy to
sweeten his contract or sign with a new network. (Bongino denied the
speculation, attributing it to “jealous” fellow-hosts.) After a week and a half,
he declared a “stalemate” and returned to the airwaves, promising to put two
hundred and fifty thousand dollars of his own money into a fund for Cumulus
employees who had lost jobs for refusing to be vaccinated.

“I swear I’m usually good at this—I must’ve put on too much lotion earlier.”
 * Facebook
 * Twitter
 * Email
 * Shopping

Cartoon by Sophie Lucido Johnson and Sammi Skolmoski

But his failure to make his network comply fortified his argument that
conservatives needed their own platforms, to protect against liberal
antagonists. “If they can’t get a bank to cancel you, they’ll go to the payment
processor, Stripe,” he told me. “If they can’t get Stripe to cancel you, they’ll
go to PayPal.” He added, “I said to my audience years ago, ‘We have to find
every single link in that chain and create an alternate company that believes in
free speech.’ ”



As a first step, he had invested in Parler, a social network funded by the
Republican megadonor Rebekah Mercer. Founded in 2018, Parler prohibited criminal
activity and bots but otherwise pledged not to “censor ideas, political parties
or ideologies.” Anti-Semitic material abounded, including hashtags such as
#HitlerWasRight, but the platform nevertheless attracted official accounts from
many prominent Republicans, including Senator Ted Cruz, of Texas. In June, 2020,
Bongino and others involved in the company visited Mar-a-Lago to meet with Brad
Parscale, Trump’s campaign manager. According to a participant, the goal was to
discuss the prospect of the President adopting Parler in exchange for partial
ownership. During the meeting, Jeffrey Wernick, who was a Parler consultant and
is Bongino’s partner in other ventures, grew suspicious that Parscale was there
mostly on his own behalf. “I sat there. I listened,” Wernick told me. “All I’m
hearing is a guy hyping himself.” The talks were soon ended, after the White
House counsel’s office registered concerns that such a deal with a sitting
President could violate ethics laws.

In the days after the siege of the Capitol, as Trump and his allies were ejected
from mainstream social media, Parler became the most downloaded item in Apple’s
App Store. It didn’t last; Apple and Google stopped offering the app, and the
company faded into a scrum of litigation among founders and investors. But
Bongino saw that flash of success as proof of demand. He conceived of projects
to create conservative alternatives to GoFundMe and Eventbrite, and promoted the
video site Rumble, in which he is an investor. I asked him what boundaries
Rumble imposes on users, and he said, “If you’re not violating our terms of
service, and you’re abiding by the law, it’s not my business.”

Since the fall of 2020, Rumble’s traffic has grown more than twentyfold, to an
average of thirty-six million users a month. Bongino, in promotional mode, told
me that it was the “first viable video-platform contender to YouTube that’s
exploding in traffic.” It’s “through the roof,” he said. Still, Rumble’s traffic
represents less than two per cent of YouTube’s in a typical month. The tech
giants that Bongino resents succeeded by promoting conflict and scale. But, if
conservatives evacuate the center rings of American technology, they will lose
an essential part of any matchup: the heel. You could still own the libs at a
distance, but it would no longer be a contact sport. It’s akin to changing the
channel from Ultimate Fighting Championship to the Sports Junkies.

At times, in our conversations, Bongino seemed to be straining to make the case
that his alternative technologies pose a meaningful challenge to the behemoths.
“There’s a lot happening behind the scenes,” he said. “I don’t think the left
and the media and the Big Tech tyrants out there have any idea what’s coming.
Believe me. There’s a consortium of people who’ve had enough, and they’ve got
the money, the assets, and the time.” I asked him to mention one other
entrepreneur who was working behind the scenes. He balked. “I’m hesitant to give
that up,” he said. “Leftists will cancel them.”

In any event, the biggest entrepreneur came pre-cancelled. Trump announced in
October that the Trump Media & Technology Group was developing an alternative to
Twitter, called Truth Social. To finance its growth, the firm would merge with a
publicly traded blank-check company (the fashionable Wall Street innovation
known as a “special-purpose acquisition company,” or SPAC), giving the former
President access to hundreds of millions of dollars. To Trump’s critics, the
deal sounded like a grift to end all grifts. Within weeks, it was under
investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority. But, if Trump can hold it together, it may
provide his largest step yet toward regaining a political voice in the lead-up
to the 2024 election.

Several weeks after Trump’s announcement, Rumble declared that it, too, planned
to merge with a SPAC. Then the companies announced a partnership: Bongino’s
favored platform would stream the video for Trump’s app. If conservatives wanted
to get out of the wilderness, Bongino told listeners, they needed to build their
own “parallel information economy.” Act now. “We decide who comes in,” he said.
“It’s the only way to win.”

Even if the technology proves rickety, ventures by Trump and Bongino would give
their fans new power to turn zeal into action—a crucial element of what Edward
Bernays, one of the founding fathers of public relations, called the “simple
machinery of group leadership.” For Bernays, who in his long career persuaded
Americans to buy more Ivory soap, to eat more bananas, and to support the First
World War, the goal was to cultivate customers so devoted that they take matters
into their own hands. “As if actuated by the pressure of a button,” he wrote,
“people began working for the client.”

A fanatically loyal audience can be very profitable—and, at times, very
dangerous. During a public event in Idaho in October, the pro-Trump commentator
Charlie Kirk was asked by a fan, “When do we get to use the guns?” The crowd
tittered, and the fan continued, “I mean, literally, where’s the line? How many
elections are they going to steal before we kill these people?” Kirk, who seemed
to sense how poorly the moment was going to play on YouTube, interrupted him.
“I’m going to denounce that,” he said. “We have to be the ones that do not play
into the violent aims and ambitions of the other side.” Instead, he said, Idaho
should ban vaccine mandates, eject some federal agencies, and “pick and choose”
what federal laws it considers constitutional. When the man asked again when
violence was required, Kirk urged him to be wary of abetting his opponents’
conspiracy: “They’re trying to get you to do something that then justifies what
they actually want to do.”

The moment captured the perils of living in a nation beset by information
warfare: if January 6th made anything clear, it was that some number of
Americans will eventually abandon a distinction between rhetorical battle and
the real thing. Bongino’s business thrives in that borderland, the realm of
thinking where the best way to stay safe is to buy the shotguns and holsters
that he advertises on his show.




One morning in November, he posted to Facebook a video of himself in an
especially grave mood. He wore a bright-red T-shirt from a sponsor: Bravo
Company, a manufacturer of military-style rifles and accessories, which promotes
itself with a Latin motto that translates as “If you wish for peace, prepare for
war.” Hunched over the microphone, Bongino stared into the camera. “We are
descending at an increasingly rapid rate into fascism,” he said. “Chaos. You’re
seeing the evaporation of civil liberties in live time, the Bill of Rights being
used like toilet paper, the Constitution being thrown out, the rapid spread of
insane deadly ideas, like the defunding of the police and the abolition of our
military.”



The monologue, a snippet of a podcast episode first released in April, centered
on his usual complaints about Silicon Valley—YouTube had removed a video of
scholars who advised children not to wear masks—but Bongino had elevated it to a
larger showdown with opponents whom he called “pieces of human filth.”

“There’s a lot going on behind the scenes,” he said. “There are people now
openly silencing and attacking conservatives, trying to have them jailed, trying
to have them sanctioned, bankrupted financially, fired from their jobs. This is
all happening right now! And it’s all happening because of the Democrat Party
and the liberals.” He was shouting now, waving a hand in front of the lens.
“They are fascists! That’s not in dispute!”

He seemed to catch himself. “My apologies,” he said. “I don’t mean this to sound
rambling.” But, he explained, his experience with cancer had heightened his
sense of the stakes. It “put horse blinders on me to see what really matters,”
he said. “The fight is all that matters, and it’s all that should matter to
you.”

He reached what he presented as an encouraging conclusion: “The only good news
about the rapid descent is we’re going to hit a bottom soon. And I promise
you. . . . ” He squeezed his eyes shut and clenched his fists. “I promise you! I
know it—the Lord will not let this country go down like that.” He stared into
the camera again. “There will be an ascent just as fast, where freedom and
liberty will reëmerge, and these people on the other side of it, the Big Tech
tyrant totalitarian fascists, their liberal buddies, the Biden Administration,
they will all—all—have to answer for this.”

In the next three weeks, Bongino’s video was watched on Facebook nearly six
million times. It attracted comments from fans around the country, who heard in
his words a case for belief and an argument to take action. A woman from
Texas—whom Facebook had rewarded with a “Top Fan” badge, identifying her as one
of Bongino’s most active supporters—wrote, “I wonder when we will put our phones
down and get out, face to face and shoulder to shoulder to stand against this?”
Another follower celebrated the campaign against vaccine mandates and gloried in
the prospect of vindication. “Seeing a rise in people turning to NOT getting so
many jabs, quitting jobs, and telling govt. to screw off is the first sign of a
revolt,” she wrote, and added, “Let the revolt happen.” ♦




Published in the print edition of the January 3 & 10, 2022, issue, with the
headline “Maga-Phone.”


NEW YORKER FAVORITES

 * Why we make resolutions (and why they fail).

 * Was Jeanne Calment the oldest person who ever lived—or a fraud?

 * The long wait for the first woman world champion in chess.

 * The repressive, authoritarian soul of “Thomas the Tank Engine & Friends.”

 * The Kremlin’s creative director.

 * A photographer’s parents wave farewell.

Sign up for our daily newsletter to receive the best stories from The New
Yorker.

Evan Osnos is a staff writer at The New Yorker. His most recent book is
“Wildland: The Making of America’s Fury.”

More:ConservativesCommentatorsDonald TrumpRadio HostsFox NewsBroadcastingKamala
Harris2020 ElectionTalk RadioMediaRight WingExtremismVirginia ThomasVaccinations


THIS WEEK’S ISSUE

Never miss a big New Yorker story again. Sign up for This Week’s Issue and get
an e-mail every week with the stories you have to read.
Enter your e-mail address

Sign up

By signing up, you agree to our User Agreement and Privacy Policy & Cookie
Statement.








Sections

 * News
 * Books & Culture
 * Fiction & Poetry
 * Humor & Cartoons
 * Magazine
 * Crossword
 * Video
 * Podcasts
 * Archive
 * Goings On

More

 * Customer Care
 * Shop The New Yorker
 * Buy Covers and Cartoons
 * Condé Nast Store
 * Digital Access
 * Newsletters
 * Jigsaw Puzzle
 * RSS
 * Site Map

 * About
 * Careers
 * Contact
 * F.A.Q.
 * Media Kit
 * Press
 * Accessibility Help
 * Condé Nast Spotlight

© 2022 Condé Nast. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance
of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy and Cookie Statement and Your
California Privacy Rights. The New Yorker may earn a portion of sales from
products that are purchased through our site as part of our Affiliate
Partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced,
distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior
written permission of Condé Nast. Ad Choices


 * Facebook
 * Twitter
 * Snapchat
 * YouTube
 * Instagram

Manage Preferences







WE CARE ABOUT YOUR PRIVACY

We and our partners store and/or access information on a device, such as unique
IDs in cookies to process personal data. You may accept or manage your choices
by clicking below or at any time in the privacy policy page. These choices will
be signaled to our partners and will not affect browsing data.


WE AND OUR PARTNERS PROCESS DATA TO PROVIDE:

Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for
identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised ads
and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and product
development. List of Partners (vendors)

I Accept
Show Purposes