news.bloomberglaw.com
Open in
urlscan Pro
170.75.234.46
Public Scan
URL:
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/litigation/schools-gender-identity-protocol-puzzles-first-circuit-judges
Submission: On September 27 via manual from US — Scanned from CA
Submission: On September 27 via manual from US — Scanned from CA
Form analysis
0 forms found in the DOMText Content
Skip to content Bloomberg the Company & Its ProductsBloomberg Anywhere Remote LoginBloomberg Anywhere LoginBloomberg Terminal Demo Request * BLOOMBERG Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world. FOR CUSTOMERS * Bloomberg Anywhere Remote Login * Software Updates * Manage Products and Account Information SUPPORT Americas+1 212 318 2000 EMEA+44 20 7330 7500 Asia Pacific+65 6212 1000 * COMPANY * Bloomberg London * About * Careers * Diversity and Inclusion * Gender-Equality Index * Philanthropy and Engagement * Sustainability * Tech * Bloomberg Beta COMMUNICATIONS * Press Announcements * Press Contacts FOLLOW * Facebook * Twitter * LinkedIn * Instagram * PRODUCTS * Bloomberg Terminal * Execution and Order Management * Data and Content * Financial Data Management * Integration and Distribution * Bloomberg Tradebook INDUSTRY PRODUCTS * Bloomberg Law * Bloomberg Tax * Bloomberg Government * Bloomberg Environment * Bloomberg New Energy Finance * MEDIA * Bloomberg Markets * Bloomberg Technology * Bloomberg Pursuits * Bloomberg Politics * Bloomberg Opinion * Bloomberg Businessweek * Bloomberg Live Conferences * Bloomberg Apps * Bloomberg Radio * Bloomberg Television * News Bureaus MEDIA SERVICES * Bloomberg Media Distribution * Advertising * COMPANY * Bloomberg London * About * Careers * Diversity and Inclusion * Gender-Equality Index * Philanthropy and Engagement * Sustainability * Tech * Bloomberg Beta COMMUNICATIONS * Press Announcements * Press Contacts FOLLOW * Facebook * Twitter * LinkedIn * Instagram * PRODUCTS * Bloomberg Terminal * Execution and Order Management * Data and Content * Financial Data Management * Integration and Distribution * Bloomberg Tradebook INDUSTRY PRODUCTS * Bloomberg Law * Bloomberg Tax * Bloomberg Government * Bloomberg Environment * Bloomberg New Energy Finance * MEDIA * Bloomberg Markets * Bloomberg Technology * Bloomberg Pursuits * Bloomberg Politics * Bloomberg Opinion * Bloomberg Businessweek * Bloomberg Live Conferences * Bloomberg Apps * Bloomberg Radio * Bloomberg Television * News Bureaus MEDIA SERVICES * Bloomberg Media Distribution * Advertising * BLOOMBERG Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world. FOR CUSTOMERS * Bloomberg Anywhere Remote Login * Software Updates * Manage Contracts and Orders SUPPORT Americas+1 212 318 2000 EMEA+44 20 7330 7500 Asia Pacific+65 6212 1000 We use cookies.Learn MoreAccept News Podcasts Research Tools Log In Sign Up For Newsletter Bloomberg Law * Antitrust * Artificial Intelligence * Banking Law * Bankruptcy Law * Before the Bar * Benefits & Executive Comp * Bloomberg Law Analysis * Business & Practice * Cannabis * Capital Markets * Class Action * Crypto * Daily Labor Report ® * Energy * Environment & Energy * ESG * Federal Contracting * Health Law & Business * Immigration * In-House Counsel * Insurance * International Trade * IP Law * Legal Ethics * Legal Ops & Tech * Litigation * Mergers & Acquisitions * Occupational Safety * PFAS Project * Pharma & Life Sciences * Privacy & Data Security Law * Private Equity * Product Liability & Toxics Law * Securities Law * Social Justice & Diversity * Tech & Telecom Law * US Law Week * White Collar & Criminal Law Bloomberg Tax * Daily Tax Report ® * Daily Tax Report: International * Daily Tax Report: State * Financial Accounting * Payroll * Tax Insights & Commentary * Tax Management International * Tax Management Memo * Transfer Pricing * Brief Analyzer * Draft Analyzer * Dockets * Practical Guidance * Points of Law Litigation Students file into their classroom at Sun Yat Sen M.S. 131 on Feb. 25, 2021 as New York allowed middle school pupils the option for in-person learning for the first time in months. Michael Loccisano/Getty Images Sept. 13, 2023, 10:36 AM SCHOOL’S GENDER IDENTITY PROTOCOL PUZZLES FIRST CIRCUIT JUDGES By Allie Reed Allie Reed Correspondent Share To:Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Listen PrintEmail * Parents argue right to be told about new pronoun use * School claims state law requires affirming gender identity The First Circuit appeared open Wednesday to the idea that parents have a constitutional right to be alerted when their child uses new pronouns at school, but cast doubt on whether that right extends to choosing how teachers refer to their child. The panel of judges during oral argument weighed the matter in a lawsuit brought by parents Stephen Foote and Marissa Silvestri, who sued the Ludlow, Massachusetts School Committee over a teacher’s failure to tell them that their child began identifying as genderqueer. The parents claim the well-established constitutional right to direct the upbringing of their child extends to what pronouns they use at school. The school district argues that calling students by their preferred pronouns is required to comply with Massachusetts’ anti-discrimination law for public schools. “One of the basic rights that parents have is to decide whether to keep their children in private or public school,” Judge Julie Rikelman said. If a school doesn’t disclose important information about a child’s gender identity, “they then lose the ability to make a really meaningful decision: do we keep our child in that school, or do we move our child to another school?” The First Circuit’s decision will likely be the highest court ruling to date on the merits of an argument circulating in federal courts across the country, which could eventually reach the US Supreme Court. ‘SHOCK THE CONSCIENCE’ The argument centered around whether the parents could prove the state violated their Fourteenth Amendment right to make decisions about the upbringing of their children. The US District Court for the District of Massachusetts threw out the case in December 2022 after finding that the parents failed the “shock the conscience” test, which analyzes whether someone can bring a substantive due process claim against the state by determining whether they’ve alleged “facts so extreme and egregious as to shock the contemporary conscience.” “A significant interference with a protected relationship, such as the parent-child relationship,” can itself shock the conscience, said Mary McAlister, senior litigation counsel with the Child & Parental Rights Campaign Inc., who represents the parents. But the shock the conscience test is “a two step process,” where the court must first decide whether conduct is “so egregious that it shocks the conscience,” and then examine that the state interfered with a right protected by the substantive Due Process Clause, said Judge Kermit Lipez. “Aren’t you conflating the concept of interference with a right with the shock the conscience analysis?” Lipez asked. David Lawless, a partner at Robinson Donovan PC representing the school district, said that the school’s “mere failure to convey important information doesn’t shock the conscience.” That standard is a very high bar: for example, even if a school had knowledge that a student was depressed, and the student later committed suicide, it would not shock the conscience, Lawless said. The school district also argued that taking the parents’ side would put an unfair burden on schools. “If one accepts that gender identity must always be disclosed to parents, there’s no limiting principal” to what other information about a students’ well-being must be disclosed, Lawless said. “Respectfully, that doesn’t seem correct to me,” Rikelman replied, asking Lawless if he was really saying there was no difference between “the gender identity of your child and who your child played with at recess that day?” MENTAL HEALTH TREATMENT The parents argue that by affirming their child’s gender identity, the school violated a parent’s constitutional right to direct their child’s mental health care. “When a school district engages in what is called social transitioning, which incorporates using a different name for the child and referring to the child as another gender,” McAlister said, courts have concluded that constitutes treatment for gender dysphoria. While Rikelman agreed that “it can be important for an individual’s mental health to have their preferred pronouns and name recognized,” it’s a stretch to argue that “ordinary people in everyday life are providing mental health treatment when they are using people’s preferred pronouns.” Lipez said McAlister’s “assertion that the very use of pronouns is a form of medical or mental health treatment” is “a classic form of a conclusory assertion that’s designed to fit a legal theory,” which “we’re told to be wary of in evaluating a motion to dismiss.” The case is Foote v. Ludlow School Comm., 1st Cir., No. 23-1069, oral argument 9/13/23. Continue Reading To contact the reporter on this story: Allie Reed in Boston at areed@bloombergindustry.com To contact the editors responsible for this story: Fawn Johnson at fjohnson@bloombergindustry.com; Alex Clearfield at aclearfield@bloombergindustry.com LEARN MORE ABOUT BLOOMBERG LAW OR LOG IN TO KEEP READING: LEARN ABOUT BLOOMBERG LAW AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news. Learn more ALREADY A SUBSCRIBER? Log in to keep reading or access research tools. Log In DOCUMENTS Docket RELATED STORIES Public School’s Pronoun Protocol Tests Bounds of Parental Rights Sept. 12, 2023, 2:00 AM California Sues Over School Outing Kids’ Pronouns to Parents (2) Aug. 28, 2023, 2:28 PM TOPICS * parentage * pediatric care * mental health care * due process © 2023 Bloomberg Industry Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved MORE FROM BLOOMBERG LAW MOST READ STORIES IN LITIGATION CASINOS CHALLENGE DESANTIS’ $2.5 BILLION SPORTS BETTING DEAL The future of mobile sports betting in America’s third-largest state is on the line after Florida casinos challenged a $2.5 billion dollar deal Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) struck with a Native American tribe. PROSKAUER ROSE SETTLES $636 MILLION MALPRACTICE SUIT Proskauer Rose LLP and a former client agreed to settle a $636 million malpractice suit before a Massachusetts state judge on Friday, dismissing the case with prejudice. TORTURE MEMO AUTHOR YOO TESTIMONY LIMITED IN EASTMAN ETHICS TRIAL John Yoo, a former George W. Bush administration official, testified Tuesday he found a single scholarly article fully supporting Trump attorney John Eastman’s argument that the vice president, and not Congress, had the authority to resolve electoral disputes. LATEST STORIES IN LITIGATION POLSINELLI WINS APPEAL IN PHARMA CASE FAULTING USE OF WILMERHALE Polsinelli prevailed in the appeal of a breach of contract suit accusing the firm of abusing a flat-fee arrangement while defending an online pharmacy and its former chief executive. APPLE APP-STORE RULING CHALLENGED AT SUPREME COURT BY EPIC (1) Epic Games Inc. asked the US Supreme Court to review a judge’s 2021 ruling that Apple Inc.’s App Store policies don’t violate federal antitrust laws. US ASKS SUPREME COURT TO PAUSE SOCIAL MEDIA CONTACTS BLOCK The US Solicitor General asked the US Supreme Court to pause an early block on the Biden administration’s contact with social media platforms over moderating vaccine misinformation. Browse More Stories in Litigation Sign Up For Newsletter * * * * * Submit A News Tip * Do Not Sell My Info (CA) * About Us * Contact Us * pro.bloomberglaw.com * 24/7 BLAW® HELP DESK * 888.560.2529 * help@bloomberglaw.com * Terms of Service * • * Privacy Policy * Copyright * • * Accessibility © 2023 Bloomberg Industry Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved © 2023 Bloomberg Industry Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved