news.bloomberglaw.com Open in urlscan Pro
170.75.234.46  Public Scan

URL: https://news.bloomberglaw.com/litigation/schools-gender-identity-protocol-puzzles-first-circuit-judges
Submission: On September 27 via manual from US — Scanned from CA

Form analysis 0 forms found in the DOM

Text Content

Skip to content
Bloomberg the Company & Its ProductsBloomberg Anywhere Remote LoginBloomberg
Anywhere LoginBloomberg Terminal Demo Request


 * BLOOMBERG
   
   Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and
   ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial
   information, news and insight around the world.
   
   
   FOR CUSTOMERS
   
    * Bloomberg Anywhere Remote Login
    * Software Updates
    * Manage Products and Account Information
   
   
   SUPPORT
   
   Americas+1 212 318 2000
   
   EMEA+44 20 7330 7500
   
   Asia Pacific+65 6212 1000


 * COMPANY
   
    * Bloomberg London
    * About
    * Careers
    * Diversity and Inclusion
    * Gender-Equality Index
    * Philanthropy and Engagement
    * Sustainability
    * Tech
    * Bloomberg Beta
   
   
   COMMUNICATIONS
   
    * Press Announcements
    * Press Contacts
   
   
   FOLLOW
   
    * Facebook
    * Twitter
    * LinkedIn
    * Instagram


 * PRODUCTS
   
    * Bloomberg Terminal
    * Execution and Order Management
    * Data and Content
    * Financial Data Management
    * Integration and Distribution
    * Bloomberg Tradebook
   
   
   INDUSTRY PRODUCTS
   
    * Bloomberg Law
    * Bloomberg Tax
    * Bloomberg Government
    * Bloomberg Environment
    * Bloomberg New Energy Finance


 * MEDIA
   
    * Bloomberg Markets
    * Bloomberg Technology
    * Bloomberg Pursuits
    * Bloomberg Politics
    * Bloomberg Opinion
    * Bloomberg Businessweek
    * Bloomberg Live Conferences
    * Bloomberg Apps
    * Bloomberg Radio
    * Bloomberg Television
    * News Bureaus
   
   
   MEDIA SERVICES
   
    * Bloomberg Media Distribution
    * Advertising


 * COMPANY
   
    * Bloomberg London
    * About
    * Careers
    * Diversity and Inclusion
    * Gender-Equality Index
    * Philanthropy and Engagement
    * Sustainability
    * Tech
    * Bloomberg Beta
   
   
   COMMUNICATIONS
   
    * Press Announcements
    * Press Contacts
   
   
   FOLLOW
   
    * Facebook
    * Twitter
    * LinkedIn
    * Instagram


 * PRODUCTS
   
    * Bloomberg Terminal
    * Execution and
      Order Management
    * Data and Content
    * Financial Data
      Management
    * Integration and
      Distribution
    * Bloomberg
      Tradebook
   
   
   INDUSTRY PRODUCTS
   
    * Bloomberg Law
    * Bloomberg Tax
    * Bloomberg Government
    * Bloomberg Environment
    * Bloomberg New Energy Finance


 * MEDIA
   
    * Bloomberg Markets
    * Bloomberg
      Technology
    * Bloomberg Pursuits
    * Bloomberg Politics
    * Bloomberg Opinion
    * Bloomberg
      Businessweek
    * Bloomberg Live Conferences
    * Bloomberg Apps
    * Bloomberg Radio
    * Bloomberg Television
    * News Bureaus
   
   
   MEDIA SERVICES
   
    * Bloomberg Media Distribution
    * Advertising


 * BLOOMBERG
   
   Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and
   ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial
   information, news and insight around the world.
   
   
   FOR CUSTOMERS
   
    * Bloomberg Anywhere Remote Login
    * Software Updates
    * Manage Contracts and Orders
   
   
   SUPPORT
   
   Americas+1 212 318 2000
   
   EMEA+44 20 7330 7500
   
   Asia Pacific+65 6212 1000


We use cookies.Learn MoreAccept



News Podcasts
Research Tools

Log In
Sign Up For Newsletter
Bloomberg Law
 * Antitrust
 * Artificial Intelligence
 * Banking Law
 * Bankruptcy Law
 * Before the Bar
 * Benefits & Executive Comp
 * Bloomberg Law Analysis
 * Business & Practice
 * Cannabis
 * Capital Markets
 * Class Action
 * Crypto
 * Daily Labor Report ®
 * Energy
 * Environment & Energy
 * ESG
 * Federal Contracting
 * Health Law & Business
 * Immigration
 * In-House Counsel
 * Insurance
 * International Trade
 * IP Law
 * Legal Ethics
 * Legal Ops & Tech
 * Litigation
 * Mergers & Acquisitions
 * Occupational Safety
 * PFAS Project
 * Pharma & Life Sciences
 * Privacy & Data Security Law
 * Private Equity
 * Product Liability & Toxics Law
 * Securities Law
 * Social Justice & Diversity
 * Tech & Telecom Law
 * US Law Week
 * White Collar & Criminal Law

Bloomberg Tax
 * Daily Tax Report ®
 * Daily Tax Report: International
 * Daily Tax Report: State
 * Financial Accounting
 * Payroll
 * Tax Insights & Commentary
 * Tax Management International
 * Tax Management Memo
 * Transfer Pricing

 * Brief Analyzer
 * Draft Analyzer
 * Dockets
 * Practical Guidance
 * Points of Law

Litigation
Students file into their classroom at Sun Yat Sen M.S. 131 on Feb. 25, 2021 as
New York allowed middle school pupils the option for in-person learning for the
first time in months.
Michael Loccisano/Getty Images
Sept. 13, 2023, 10:36 AM


SCHOOL’S GENDER IDENTITY PROTOCOL PUZZLES FIRST CIRCUIT JUDGES

By Allie Reed

Allie Reed
Correspondent

Share To:Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter
Listen PrintEmail

 * Parents argue right to be told about new pronoun use
 * School claims state law requires affirming gender identity

The First Circuit appeared open Wednesday to the idea that parents have a
constitutional right to be alerted when their child uses new pronouns at school,
but cast doubt on whether that right extends to choosing how teachers refer to
their child.

The panel of judges during oral argument weighed the matter in a lawsuit brought
by parents Stephen Foote and Marissa Silvestri, who sued the Ludlow,
Massachusetts School Committee over a teacher’s failure to tell them that their
child began identifying as genderqueer.

The parents claim the well-established constitutional right to direct the
upbringing of their child extends to what pronouns they use at school. The
school district argues that calling students by their preferred pronouns is
required to comply with Massachusetts’ anti-discrimination law for public
schools.

“One of the basic rights that parents have is to decide whether to keep their
children in private or public school,” Judge Julie Rikelman said. If a school
doesn’t disclose important information about a child’s gender identity, “they
then lose the ability to make a really meaningful decision: do we keep our child
in that school, or do we move our child to another school?”

The First Circuit’s decision will likely be the highest court ruling to date on
the merits of an argument circulating in federal courts across the country,
which could eventually reach the US Supreme Court.


‘SHOCK THE CONSCIENCE’

The argument centered around whether the parents could prove the state violated
their Fourteenth Amendment right to make decisions about the upbringing of their
children.

The US District Court for the District of Massachusetts threw out the case in
December 2022 after finding that the parents failed the “shock the conscience”
test, which analyzes whether someone can bring a substantive due process claim
against the state by determining whether they’ve alleged “facts so extreme and
egregious as to shock the contemporary conscience.”

“A significant interference with a protected relationship, such as the
parent-child relationship,” can itself shock the conscience, said Mary
McAlister, senior litigation counsel with the Child & Parental Rights Campaign
Inc., who represents the parents.

But the shock the conscience test is “a two step process,” where the court must
first decide whether conduct is “so egregious that it shocks the conscience,”
and then examine that the state interfered with a right protected by the
substantive Due Process Clause, said Judge Kermit Lipez.

“Aren’t you conflating the concept of interference with a right with the shock
the conscience analysis?” Lipez asked.

David Lawless, a partner at Robinson Donovan PC representing the school
district, said that the school’s “mere failure to convey important information
doesn’t shock the conscience.” That standard is a very high bar: for example,
even if a school had knowledge that a student was depressed, and the student
later committed suicide, it would not shock the conscience, Lawless said.

The school district also argued that taking the parents’ side would put an
unfair burden on schools. “If one accepts that gender identity must always be
disclosed to parents, there’s no limiting principal” to what other information
about a students’ well-being must be disclosed, Lawless said.

“Respectfully, that doesn’t seem correct to me,” Rikelman replied, asking
Lawless if he was really saying there was no difference between “the gender
identity of your child and who your child played with at recess that day?”


MENTAL HEALTH TREATMENT

The parents argue that by affirming their child’s gender identity, the school
violated a parent’s constitutional right to direct their child’s mental health
care.

“When a school district engages in what is called social transitioning, which
incorporates using a different name for the child and referring to the child as
another gender,” McAlister said, courts have concluded that constitutes
treatment for gender dysphoria.

While Rikelman agreed that “it can be important for an individual’s mental
health to have their preferred pronouns and name recognized,” it’s a stretch to
argue that “ordinary people in everyday life are providing mental health
treatment when they are using people’s preferred pronouns.”

Lipez said McAlister’s “assertion that the very use of pronouns is a form of
medical or mental health treatment” is “a classic form of a conclusory assertion
that’s designed to fit a legal theory,” which “we’re told to be wary of in
evaluating a motion to dismiss.”

The case is Foote v. Ludlow School Comm., 1st Cir., No. 23-1069, oral argument
9/13/23.

Continue Reading

To contact the reporter on this story: Allie Reed in Boston at
areed@bloombergindustry.com

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Fawn Johnson at
fjohnson@bloombergindustry.com; Alex Clearfield at
aclearfield@bloombergindustry.com


LEARN MORE ABOUT BLOOMBERG LAW OR LOG IN TO KEEP READING:


LEARN ABOUT BLOOMBERG LAW

AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.

Learn more


ALREADY A SUBSCRIBER?

Log in to keep reading or access research tools.

Log In

DOCUMENTS

Docket

RELATED STORIES

Public School’s Pronoun Protocol Tests Bounds of Parental Rights
Sept. 12, 2023, 2:00 AM
California Sues Over School Outing Kids’ Pronouns to Parents (2)
Aug. 28, 2023, 2:28 PM

TOPICS

 * parentage
 * pediatric care
 * mental health care
 * due process

© 2023 Bloomberg Industry Group, Inc.
All Rights Reserved


MORE FROM BLOOMBERG LAW


MOST READ STORIES IN LITIGATION


CASINOS CHALLENGE DESANTIS’ $2.5 BILLION SPORTS BETTING DEAL

The future of mobile sports betting in America’s third-largest state is on the
line after Florida casinos challenged a $2.5 billion dollar deal Gov. Ron
DeSantis (R) struck with a Native American tribe.


PROSKAUER ROSE SETTLES $636 MILLION MALPRACTICE SUIT

Proskauer Rose LLP and a former client agreed to settle a $636 million
malpractice suit before a Massachusetts state judge on Friday, dismissing the
case with prejudice.


TORTURE MEMO AUTHOR YOO TESTIMONY LIMITED IN EASTMAN ETHICS TRIAL

John Yoo, a former George W. Bush administration official, testified Tuesday he
found a single scholarly article fully supporting Trump attorney John Eastman’s
argument that the vice president, and not Congress, had the authority to resolve
electoral disputes.


LATEST STORIES IN LITIGATION


POLSINELLI WINS APPEAL IN PHARMA CASE FAULTING USE OF WILMERHALE

Polsinelli prevailed in the appeal of a breach of contract suit accusing the
firm of abusing a flat-fee arrangement while defending an online pharmacy and
its former chief executive.


APPLE APP-STORE RULING CHALLENGED AT SUPREME COURT BY EPIC (1)

Epic Games Inc. asked the US Supreme Court to review a judge’s 2021 ruling that
Apple Inc.’s App Store policies don’t violate federal antitrust laws.


US ASKS SUPREME COURT TO PAUSE SOCIAL MEDIA CONTACTS BLOCK

The US Solicitor General asked the US Supreme Court to pause an early block on
the Biden administration’s contact with social media platforms over moderating
vaccine misinformation.

Browse More Stories in Litigation
Sign Up For Newsletter
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 

 * Submit A News Tip
 * Do Not Sell My Info (CA)
 * About Us
 * Contact Us
 * pro.bloomberglaw.com

 * 24/7 BLAW® HELP DESK
 * 888.560.2529
 * help@bloomberglaw.com

 * Terms of Service
 * •
 * Privacy Policy

 * Copyright
 * •
 * Accessibility

© 2023 Bloomberg Industry Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved
© 2023 Bloomberg Industry Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved