www.todayifoundout.com Open in urlscan Pro
2606:4700:20::681a:8a3  Public Scan

URL: http://www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2010/01/nasa-uses-the-movie-armageddon-in-their-management-training-program/
Submission Tags: falconsandbox
Submission: On September 27 via api from US — Scanned from DE

Form analysis 3 forms found in the DOM

Name: mc-embedded-subscribe-formPOST http://todayifoundout.us5.list-manage1.com/subscribe/post?u=1b41057449af09fd2f4481595&id=cfe94f6138

<form action="http://todayifoundout.us5.list-manage1.com/subscribe/post?u=1b41057449af09fd2f4481595&amp;id=cfe94f6138" method="post" id="mc-embedded-subscribe-form" name="mc-embedded-subscribe-form" class="validate" target="_blank" novalidate="">
  <div class="mc-field-group">
    <b>Enjoy this article? Join over <b>50,000 Subscribers</b> getting our <b>FREE</b> Daily Knowledge and Weekly Wrap newsletters:</b>
    <input type="email" value="" name="EMAIL" class="required email" placeholder="email address" id="mce-EMAIL">
    <input type="submit" value="Subscribe" name="subscribe" id="mc-embedded-subscribe">
  </div>
  <br>
  <div class="mc-field-group input-group">
    <strong>Subscribe Me To:</strong>
    <input type="checkbox" value="1" name="group[7741][1]" id="mce-group[7741]-7741-0" checked="checked">
    <label for="mce-group[7741]-7741-0">Daily Knowledge</label> &nbsp;|&nbsp; <input type="checkbox" value="2" name="group[7741][2]" id="mce-group[7741]-7741-1" checked="checked">
    <label for="mce-group[7741]-7741-1">Weekly Wrap</label>
  </div>
  <div id="mce-responses" class="clear">
    <div class="response" id="mce-error-response" style="display:none"></div>
    <div class="response" id="mce-success-response" style="display:none"></div>
  </div>
</form>

http://www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/search/

<form action="http://www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/search/" id="cse-search-box">
  <div>
    <input type="hidden" name="cx" value="partner-pub-0145173040798420:5674361580">
    <input type="hidden" name="cof" value="FORID:10">
    <input type="hidden" name="ie" value="UTF-8">
    <input type="text" name="q" size="20" placeholder="" style="background: url(&quot;https://www.google.com/cse/static/images/1x/en/branding.png&quot;) left 9px top 50% no-repeat rgb(255, 255, 255);">
    <input type="submit" name="sa" value="Search">
  </div>
  <input name="siteurl" value="www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2010/01/nasa-uses-the-movie-armageddon-in-their-management-training-program/" type="hidden"><input name="ref" value="" type="hidden"><input name="ss" value="" type="hidden">
</form>

Name: mc-embedded-subscribe-formPOST http://todayifoundout.us5.list-manage.com/subscribe/post?u=1b41057449af09fd2f4481595&id=cfe94f6138

<form action="http://todayifoundout.us5.list-manage.com/subscribe/post?u=1b41057449af09fd2f4481595&amp;id=cfe94f6138" method="post" id="mc-embedded-subscribe-form" name="mc-embedded-subscribe-form" class="validate" target="_blank" novalidate="">
  <div class="mc-field-group">
    <label for="mce-EMAIL"></label>
    <table>
      <tbody>
        <tr>
          <td>
            <input type="email" value="" name="EMAIL" class="email" id="mce-EMAIL" placeholder="email address" required="">
          </td>
          <td>
            <input type="submit" value="Subscribe" name="subscribe" id="mc-embedded-subscribe" class="button">
          </td>
        </tr>
      </tbody>
    </table>
  </div>
  <div class="mc-field-group input-group">
    <strong>Subscribe Me To:</strong>
    <table>
      <tbody>
        <tr>
          <td>
            <input type="checkbox" value="1" name="group[7741][1]" id="mce-group[7741]-7741-0" checked="checked">
          </td>
          <td><label for="mce-group[7741]-7741-0">Daily Knowledge</label></td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <td>
            <input type="checkbox" value="2" name="group[7741][2]" id="mce-group[7741]-7741-1" checked="checked">
          </td>
          <td><label for="mce-group[7741]-7741-1">Weekly Wrap</label></td>
        </tr>
      </tbody>
    </table>
  </div>
  <div id="mce-responses" class="clear">
    <div class="response" id="mce-error-response" style="display:none"></div>
    <div class="response" id="mce-success-response" style="display:none"></div>
  </div>
</form>

Text Content

 * RSS
 * Facebook
 * YouTube
 * Twitter
 * Pinterest
 * Google+
 * Instagram
 * Tumblr

MENU

 * Home
 * Surprise
 * Kids
 * Videos
   * TodayIFoundOut YouTube
   * Educational Videos
   * Flick Facts
   * Kid’s Quest Learning
 * Articles
   * Infographics
   * Surprise
   * Answers
   * Animals
   * Entertainment
   * History
   * Language
   * People
   * Science
   * Misc.
   * Myths
   * This Day in History
   * Announcements
   * Most Popular
 * Podcasts
   * The BrainFood Show
 * Forums
 * Gear
 * Quick Facts
 * Wise Book of Whys
 * Contact




NASA USES THE MOVIE ARMAGEDDON IN THEIR MANAGEMENT TRAINING PROGRAM

January 23, 2010 Daven Hiskey

Today I found out that NASA uses the 1998 film, Armageddon, in their management
training program.

It turns out, to absolutely no one’s surprise, that this is not because it’s an
incredibly well thought out movie in how to stop an asteroid from hitting the
earth…  No, they use it because it contains over 168 distinct things that are
impossible (not just improbable, but impossible.  there are many many more if
you want to talk about improbable).  Because of this, it makes for a great
exercise in seeing how many of those things their staff can recognize, both the
impossible things and the improbable.

Now personally, I’m not one to criticize a film for having scientific
inaccuracies, so long as they are entertaining.  I mean, that’s the point of
movies right?  If a film maker wants to make true “art”, they’ll be sure and
always stay consistent with the world they create and things of this nature, but
in most cases, they are just looking to entertain and make a lot of money.



That being said, in this case, I’m willing to make an exception due to the
amazing number of inaccuracies (168 impossibilities in 150 minutes of film,
averaging over 1 per minute; that’s not even talking about the improbables; 
just the impossibles) and the fact that it’s a film based in space and about
things happening in space.  So it would stand to reason that some part of the
plot should actually have something to do with something that could actually
happen in space.  I mean, it would be like taking the movie Sleepless in Seattle
and randomly having it based in South Africa, then have gravity pull upward
instead of down, then instead of breathing air everybody breaths cotton candy,
then add about 165 more things just like that randomly and  never address in the
plot why any of these things might be the case in this world the writers and
directors have created.



Phil Plait said it best “Here’s the short version: Armageddon got some astronomy
right. For example, there is an asteroid in the movie, and asteroids do indeed
exist. And then there was… um… well, you know… um. Okay, so that was about all
they got right.”

The other head scratcher is that many of the impossibilities introduced weren’t
necessary in regards to the plot.  So they actually intentionally injected these
additional impossibilities into the story for no reason other than to make the
film longer and possible to introduce more explosions… in space.  They just
added minutes and cost to an already too long film.  This implies a lack of
effort on the part of Michael Bay in actually developing the script.  Now
granted, it is Michael Bay.  I imagine his script writing sessions tend to go
something like:

 * Scene 1:  Something blows up… a lot
 * Scene 2:  Intro main character who’s little Chihuahua pees on a car tire
   which then is all wet blows up.
 * Scene 3: Main character intros the story (note to self: make sure has nothing
   to do with the second half of the film)
 * Scene 4: Stuff blows up, but you know… BIGGER
   
 * Scene 5: Credits
 * Future Work:  Write sequel.  Make it exactly like the first movie, but with
   less dialogue and a lot more explosions.  Definitely more explosions.  And
   less real characters.  More CGI would be better, easier to make things blow
   up.

But really Michael Bay?  Really?  You couldn’t have hired a Physics Grad Student
from Berkeley for $15 an hour to do a read through of the script and give you
some feedback?  Quite a lot of those impossibilities could easily have been
worked around or removed from the script and still kept the main thrust of the
story.  Then, instead of having a movie that is essentially just a lot of stuff
blowing up… in space… for about 2 and a half hours, you might have actually made
a quality film. *gets off soap box*

But again, I always have to give props to people who can do something really
poorly or stupidly and still make a bagillion dollars off it and in this case
it’s doubly impressive because he’s managed to do it about 7 times with two up
coming movies that look pretty much like they’re going to make lucky numbers 8
and 9 on that list.  So thumbs up to you Mr. Bay.  There is nobody better at
making films that are pretty much 99% about stuff randomly blowing up and pretty
much on the strength of that central “plot” alone, making a ton of money off it…
over and over again.

If you liked this article, you might also enjoy our new popular podcast, The
BrainFood Show (iTunes, Spotify, Google Play Music, Feed), as well as:

 * You can Survive Being Exposed to the Near Vacuum of Space for About 90
   Seconds With No Long Term Damage
 * Astronauts on the International Space Station See About 15 Sunrises and
   Sunsets Per Day
 * Asteroid Fields Would Actually be Quite Safe to Fly Through
 * The Difference Between an Asteroid and a Comet

Expand for References:
 * New Scientist (September 1, 2007), “Feedback” p 72: ISSN 0262-4079
 * The Astronomy of Armageddon
 * Armageddon





Share the Knowledge!


Enjoy this article? Join over 50,000 Subscribers getting our FREE Daily
Knowledge and Weekly Wrap newsletters:

Subscribe Me To: Daily Knowledge  |  Weekly Wrap


tagged with armageddon, celebrity, director, entertainment, movie, nasa
 * Articles
 * Entertainment


14 COMMENTS

 * N
   February 2, 2010 10:22 pm
   
   I like your page, but yeah…it’s spelled “whose chihuahua”, not “who’s
   chiwawa”. I’ll give you that one for free.
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 * random
   August 6, 2013 2:25 pm
   
   This article is mostly just your opinion of Michael Bay and how he makes his
   movies. In addition to a random Sleepless in Seattle reference.
   
   In fact, the title is the entire article. Literally.
   
   Can you actually list some of the impossibilities? Like the most obvious or
   important ones…?
   
   This is not trivia to your normal standards.
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 * Orlando amaya
   May 23, 2015 2:13 pm
   
   I kept on reading your article to find out the list of imposibilites that, in
   your opinion, renders the movie worthless. Did you forget them ?
   
   
   
 * Ben Sokolow
   October 29, 2015 10:33 am
   
   This is click bait bull shit bait and switch if you don’t atleast please tell
   us 5 good impossibilties! From My timer in Kerbal land and Reddit I submit:
   1) No way to slingshot around moon and be coming fast enough to intercept
   asteroid, 2) nuke big enough to split asteroid that close to Earth would do
   more damage to Earth then the asteroid, 3) Ben Afflack the duck as a hero.
   
   
   
 * Ralphie the Wolf
   October 8, 2016 6:25 am
   
   It always interests me that posts like this (which decry lack of attention to
   detail) are so wretchedly cavalier with rules of grammar and punctuation.
   Like so many other well-trained grammar Nazis, I have learned to let things
   go in order to maintain at least SOME friends, but this guy just whines for
   multiple paragraphs about other people’s failures. I am somehow certain that
   if I personally confronted him, I would be told both that I was pedantic and
   that it didn’t matter. Dude, pick up a style guide and fix this, would ya?
   
   
   
 * t brice
   July 24, 2020 12:31 am
   
   I realize my comment is many years overdue, but i just read your post while
   doing a reality check looking for any possibility in the year 2020 of NASA
   having a vacuum chamber at all – certainly not the size as shown in the
   movie, Armageddon, but something usable for space training.
   
   It’s a fun movie that made me laugh and laugh some more, then cry and cry
   some more.
   
   It’s a movie made in Hollywood. Take off your whitey tighties, put on some
   boxers, and relax.
   
   
   


JOIN OVER 50,000 SUBSCRIBERS

Subscribe Me To:

Daily Knowledge Weekly Wrap





FIND US ON YOUTUBE!

Subscribe today to check out our free Daily Knowledge Youtube video series!




STALK US!






ADD TO KINDLE

Check Out Our New Book, The Wise Book of Whys: Print | Kindle | Nook | Audiobook



NEW STUFF

 * The Top Secret Navy Mission that Accidentally Rediscovered the Titanic
 * The Flying Bandit and One of the Greatest Gold Heists in History
 * The Littlest Naval War: Britain’s Balls to the Wall Bid to End German
   Domination of a Single Lake
 * The Mad Aussie Who Stung Himself and His 9 Year Old Son With a Deadly
   Creature FOR SCIENCE!!!
 * The Impossibly Badass Story of Mills’ Marauders
 * The Heart of a Nuclear Bomb and “Tickling the Dragon’s Tail”
 * The Immortal Woman Whose Death Changed the World




POPULAR POSTS

 * What Those Nasty White Chunks That Sometimes Come From Your Throat Are
 * The Difference Between a Fact and a Factoid
 * The Origin of the Word “Soccer”
 * Marilyn Monroe was Not Even Close to a Size 12-16
 * How Earth Got Its Name
 * A Japanese Soldier Who Continued Fighting WWII 29 Years After the Japanese
   Surrendered, Because He Didn’t Know
 * What Causes “Eye Floaters”


 * Home
 * TIFO Gear
 * Daily Knowledge Newsletter
 * Contact Us
 * Write for Us
 * F.A.Q.
 * Who We Are
 * Privacy Policy
 * About