click4r.com Open in urlscan Pro
2606:4700:20::681a:30b  Public Scan

Form analysis
0 forms found in the DOM

Text Content

由 翻译强力驱动
This website uses cookies to improve your experience.
Got It
Click4R
 * Latest
 * Business
 * Shopping
 * Sports
 * Travel
 * Hotels
 * More
   * Technology
   * Society
   * Health
   * Education
   * Entertainment
   * DIY
   * Viral
   * Funny
   * Books
   * Celebrity
   * World
   * Politics


 * Sign In
 * Register


ARE USUALLY SAFEST DISTANCE COMING FROM A 5G CELL TOWER SYSTEM?

Author: foamhole0
Posted On: March 6, 2023, 6:41 pm

If you've ever wandered through a city and spotted tiny cell towers for 5G
placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes however, they're
actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.

The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger, purpose-built cell towers.
Although they're not as visible however, they could cause problems for people.
The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time a
person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices.
The exposure limits are based on scientific data which prove that
electromagnetic energy could be harmful to human health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy
absorbed by tissue. cell phone radiation effects on human body 's typically 1.6
Watts per kilogram averaged over one Gram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to
increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This
can lead to many possible harms, such as an increase in the development of skin
conditions like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set
a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured over 1
cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This limit
for localization is in line with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg,
which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that the safest location
from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is because the transmitting
power of a cell tower increases dramatically the farther the tower is.

While it sounds like a good idea however, people living in close proximity to
towers could be more prone to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in
India found that residents who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had much
more health problems than those who lived farther away from the antennas.

However, this study also showed that residents who moved to areas that were
further from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few
days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high frequencies of
radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause cancer, brain tumors, and
other health problems.

https://jenkins-mouritsen.thoughtlanes.net/do-you-want-5g-1678125213 is because
radiofrequency radiation, utilized in wireless communications, can be absorbed
by the body's outer layer, called the skin. This is important to understand
since the skin functions as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical
forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances.
It is also the most important organ of the human body, and is responsible for
protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure


The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on various assumptions that aren't
supported by scientific research. is 5g harmful for humans and the
environment include the incorrect assumption that short-term exposures to RF
radiation is safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating
of tissue).

This assumption does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF
components of modulated RF signals, as well as the effects on the body of short
bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not
correspond with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation,
and thus they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.

Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum exposure limits to
local peak SARs based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) that is
not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of exposure to
radiofrequency radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies that
exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation with
co-exposure to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. In the event of
interactions, RF radiation and other environmental agents could cause
synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to the risk of having adverse
health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may
cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other
skin diseases such as acne.

Sponsored

 

Tags: cell phone radiation



Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
Copyright © 2023 ClickForU.com. All rights reserved.
 * About Us
 * Privacy Policy
 * Terms & Conditions
 * JOBS







原文


提供更好的翻译建议

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------






原文


提供更好的翻译建议

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




AddThis Sharing Sidebar
Share to FacebookFacebook
, Number of shares
Share to TwitterTwitterShare to EmailEmailShare to PinterestPinterest
, Number of shares
More AddThis Share optionsAddThis
, Number of shares
Share to WhatsAppWhatsAppShare to LinkedInLinkedIn
Hide
Show
Close

AddThis

AddThis Sharing
SHARESFacebookTwitterEmailPinterestAddThisWhatsAppLinkedIn