revspin.net Open in urlscan Pro
35.208.123.69  Public Scan

Form analysis
4 forms found in the DOM

/search.php

<form action="/search.php" id="cse-search-box" class="searchFormNavbar">
  <input name="q" class="form-control searchFieldNavbar" placeholder="Search" type="text"><button type="submit" name="sa" class="btn btn-default btn-sm searchFieldNavbar__button"><span class="fas fa-search" aria-hidden="true"></span></button>
  <input name="cx" value="002787641644311981793:bb2nbpwlnz0" type="hidden">
  <input name="cof" value="FORID:10" type="hidden">
  <input name="ie" value="ISO-8859-1" type="hidden">
</form>

/search.php

<form action="/search.php" id="cse-search-box">
  <input type="text" name="q" class="form-control searchFieldHome" placeholder="...Butterfly Tenergy?"><button type="submit" name="sa" class="btn btn-primary btn-sm"><span class="glyphicon glyphicon-search show-mobile-inline"
      style="opacity: 1;"></span><span class="hide-mobile-inline">Search</span></button>
  <input type="hidden" name="cx" value="partner-pub-2645691973539171:iw77jjhz7fq">
  <input type="hidden" name="cof" value="FORID:10">
  <input type="hidden" name="ie" value="ISO-8859-1">
</form>

/search.php

<form action="/search.php" id="cse-search-box" class="center">
  <input name="q" class="form-control searchFieldHome" placeholder="Search" type="text"><button type="submit" name="sa" class="btn btn-primary btn-sm"><span class="glyphicon glyphicon-search show-mobile-inline" style="opacity: 1;"></span><span
      class="hide-mobile-inline">Search</span></button>
  <input name="cx" value="002787641644311981793:bb2nbpwlnz0" type="hidden">
  <input name="cof" value="FORID:10" type="hidden">
  <input name="ie" value="ISO-8859-1" type="hidden">
</form>

POST //translate.googleapis.com/translate_voting?client=te

<form id="goog-gt-votingForm" action="//translate.googleapis.com/translate_voting?client=te" method="post" target="votingFrame" class="VIpgJd-yAWNEb-hvhgNd-aXYTce"><input type="text" name="sl" id="goog-gt-votingInputSrcLang"><input type="text"
    name="tl" id="goog-gt-votingInputTrgLang"><input type="text" name="query" id="goog-gt-votingInputSrcText"><input type="text" name="gtrans" id="goog-gt-votingInputTrgText"><input type="text" name="vote" id="goog-gt-votingInputVote"></form>

Text Content

Toggle navigation

   
 * PRODUCT REVIEWS
   * Rubbers (Inverted)
     
   * Pips
   * Blades
   * Tables
   * Balls
   * Shoes
   * Sponges
   * Training DVDs
   * Robots
   * Net Sets
   * Premade Rackets
   * Pro's Rackets
 * MISC
   * Blog
   * Retailers
   * Inbox
   * My Account
   * My Profile
 * * Log In
   * Create an Account
 * Log In
 * Create an Account
   




WARNING: JAVASCRIPT IS TURNED OFF!

For a better user experience, turn on Javascript.


TABLE TENNIS REVIEWS AND RATINGS!




RUBBER REVIEWS... VIEW RUBBERS

Reactor Tornado V5
This is a real gem of a rubber. Not well known, but its surprisingly spinny and
bouncy. The topspin can really overwhelm opponents at times. Its also very
cheap. If you just hit the ball flat, the speed itself isnt so fast. But it
really shines when you do loop-drives. The grippy topsheet creates a lot of spin
and power. Out of the box, its quite slow. It needs to be opened up with baby
oil or booster. With booster, it completely transforms into a lethal weapon.

Expand Review Collapse
by zhuangcorp
+4

Speed

8.0 Spin

9.2 Control

9.0 Overall

9.0

4.5

Butterfly Bryce FX
Outdated, not spinny, and mushy.
by powerlefty
+1

Speed

8.7 Spin

7.8 Control

7.3 Overall

7.5

3.8


BLADE REVIEWS... VIEW BLADES

Xiom Ignito
Here's an excerpt of the description of the new Energy Carbon material I got
from Xiom: "Energy Carbon of Ignito is new material. It looks like ordinary
Carbon. But, it is softer than normal Carbon though it isn't classified as Soft
Carbon. Many makers are selling Soft Carbon blades in which Carbon Fleece or
Uniaxial Carbon is used. In general, Soft Carbon means uni-axial Carbon. Carbon
fleece is another name of uni-axial Carbon. But, Energy Carbon isn't such
material. We just made it softer and reduced the internal energy loss. Less
energy loss means that more energy is transferred to ball at impact. So we named
it as 'Energy' Carbon." The made and finishing of the blade is superb and very
smooth. The only flaw I see is the cut on the logo on the handle is not very
straight, but it's a very minuscule overlook. If I were to rate it on the
finishing/make of the blade, I would rate it at 99% (-1% for the finishing of
the logo area). The head is about the average size, the size according to Xiom's
specification are: 158x150.2 while the handle are 100x34x24 for the FL (which I
have). First thing I noticed when holding it was how nice and comfortable it is
on my hand. The handle is wide and thick enough, about as good as my Hurricane
blades FL handles. It's certainly wider and thicker than the Korbel FL &
Wavestone FL handles which I also have. The head is about the same as my
Hurricanes & Korbel blades. The weight quoted for me is 83.5g but when I weighed
it using my dad's weight for his medicines, it weighed at 84g. Close enough to
the quoted weight. I've been playing with this blade for one week (four times at
about 2-3 hours each time). The rubbers I put on the blade are: Hurricane 3
Provincial 39 degree and Sriver EL Maximum. The H3P felt medium hard on the
blade while the EL felt soft (too soft for my liking). I played with this setup
for 1 night. I then switched the EL with Prashida Tokyo 2 (which are a little
bit harder than the EL – played with this setup for 3 nights). Tokyo 2
felt a little nicer, not as soft (but still feel a bit too soft). So I would
think that a little harder rubber would do well on this blade. I might try it
with Sriver L later on. Okay, here's the very concise summary: After playing one
week with Ignito, I decided to compare it with my Korbel, which has H3P 39
degrees with Cermet 2.1 on. At Sunday after playing about 2 hours with the
Ignito I switched blade. I picked up the Korbel and played with it to make out
the differences. After playing with Korbel for 5-10 minutes, I put it down and
played with the Ignito for the rest of the day. I don't know for sure, but when
I used the Korbel, it felt awful. Hits and loops were terrible and felt terrible
as well. I lost confidence after about 10 minutes playing with Korbel and not
getting the good feel I used to have with it. Now, this is just a preliminary
comparison. I now have put the same rubbers on the two blades. H3P 39 degrees +
Sriver EL Maximum on both Ignito & Korbel. Just haven't had the chance to play
with both to make the comparison just yet. Maybe next week because this week I'm
pretty busy with the preparation for my cousin's wedding this weekend. And
because this week I'm planning to play exclusively with my Hurricane King blade
fitted with H3P + Tokyo 2 PT. I have been using the HK at my training sessions
(twice a week @ 1 hour) and play with the Ignito 4 times a week @ 2-3 hours. But
this week I plan to use the HK only. Next week I'll continue with the testing
and comparing of the Ignito-Korbel (playing/switching both blades on the same
nights). Okay, going back to the Ignito. Here are the preliminary/first
impression I have on the blade: It feels good when I'm hitting. It doesn't have
as much vibration as the Korbel and it has that crisp/sharp feel when I hit. I
feel more confident hitting when using this blade. On loops, I feel that I could
make fast/loop kill shots which are low very easily with it. Even faster and
lower than when I use the HK using the same H3P rubber. It does lobs and
drive/control loops too, but the easiness and fastness of the fast loops really
impresses me. The blade like I said feels crisp/sharp while provide good amount
of dwell time for me to impart good amount of spin on the ball. I feel the blade
has low throw. The ease of looping low loop kills and also when I hit and drive
I could put the ball low and short and even long but low easily with it. When I
used the EL for that one night of playing. I noticed that several people got
tricked several times by the amount of under spin I made while chopping and
serving than usual when I used EL before. That is, the under spin is heavier
than when I usually use EL before. One of the downside I feel is that when I
moved back far from the table. I have to exert more energy than when I use HK.
Ignito having low throw doesn't help when playing at long distance away from the
table because I need to use more power for it to clear the net. Either that or I
open up the blade and make a drive/lob instead. Blocks are effortless. I usually
don't smash on FH, so I don't know how it does altering between loops and
smashes. I smash on the BH and even with soft sponge rubber like EL/Tokyo 2 (I
feel the rubbers much softer on this blade than when I use the rubbers on
Korbel), when I smash, it generates good speed and power. Enough to make the
kill. I was playing a couple of nights with the Wavestone before I got the
Ignito. I think it has some similarity in feel. Wavestone is faster I think but
feels less sturdy/stable. The Ignito has better balance and overall gives the
more solid feeling.

Expand Review Collapse
by rokphish
+1

Speed

8.5 Control

9.0 Stiffness

5.0 Overall

9.0

4.5


ALL PRODUCT CATEGORIES

 * Rubbers
 * Pips
 * Blades
 * Tables
 * Balls
 * Premade Rackets

 * Shoes
 * Sponges
 * Training DVDs
 * Robots
 * Net Sets


LOOKING TO BUY?

Find an Online Store


SEARCH PRODUCTS

Search












Translate

Powered by Google Übersetzer

Report a Problem?
Search




ABOUT

Blog
Shop
Retailers
Dictionary
Contact   

© 2024 Flipspun Inc.

Formerly the Table Tennis Database




CONNECT


Site map
Privacy and Terms
Advertise with Us

View Power Pong Robots

This website uses cookies to operate. By using this website you consent to our
use of these cookies. For more information visit our Privacy Policy.  Got it!
Originaltext

Diese Übersetzung bewerten
Mit deinem Feedback können wir Google Übersetzer weiter verbessern