www.registercitizen.com Open in urlscan Pro
151.101.0.200  Public Scan

Form analysis
1 forms found in the DOM

GET /search/

<form class="pageHeader--search-form" action="/search/" method="get">
  <input type="hidden" name="action" value="search">
  <input type="hidden" name="firstRequest" value="1">
  <input type="hidden" name="searchindex" value="solr">
  <div class="fieldset">
    <input class="pageHeader--search-input" id="search" name="query" type="text" value="" placeholder="Search" aria-label="search">
    <button class="searchButton btn" value="" name="search" type="submit" aria-label="search"></button>
  </div>
</form>

Text Content

Skip to main content Turn off refresh
Currently Reading
Benefit payment change hurts poor
Next Up:Warner Theatre presents 'Floyd Nation' in April
 * Subscribe Subscribe
 * e-Edition
   
 * Sign In
   
   
   
   


 * Home
   * Contact Us
   * Subscribe
   * Advertise with us
   * Newsletters
   * Newsstand Locations
   * Today's Paper
   * Help
   * Privacy Notice
   * Terms of Use
 * News
   * Torrington
   * Winsted
   * Litchfield County
   * Cannabis
   * Connecticut
   * Education
   * Opinion
 * Sports
   * High Schools
   * MLB
   * NFL
   * NBA
   * NHL
   * UConn
 * Business
   * Top Workplaces
   * Top Workplaces
 * Entertainment
   * Arts
   * Movies
   * Music
   * Television
   * Comics
   * Puzzles
 * Living
   * Home and Garden
 * Best Of
   * Education
   * Home Services
   * Legal Services
   * Senior Living
 * Obituaries
 * Advertising Features
   * Events
 * Jobs
 * Classifieds
 * Cars
 * Digital Edition

 * Home
   * Contact Us
   * Subscribe
   * Advertise with us
   * Newsletters
   * Newsstand Locations
   * Today's Paper
   * Help
   * Privacy Notice
   * Terms of Use
 * Living
   * Home and Garden
 * Digital Edition

 * News
   * Torrington
   * Winsted
   * Litchfield County
   * Cannabis
   * Connecticut
   * Education
   * Opinion
 * Business
   * Top Workplaces
   * Top Workplaces
 * Classifieds

 * Sports
   * High Schools
   * MLB
   * NFL
   * NBA
   * NHL
   * UConn
 * Best Of
   * Education
   * Home Services
   * Legal Services
   * Senior Living

 * Entertainment
   * Arts
   * Movies
   * Music
   * Television
   * Comics
   * Puzzles
 * Advertising Features
   * Events
 * Obituaries
 * Jobs
 * Cars

 * Home
   * Contact Us
   * Subscribe
   * Advertise with us
   * Newsletters
   * Newsstand Locations
   * Today's Paper
   * Help
   * Privacy Notice
   * Terms of Use

 * News
   * Torrington
   * Winsted
   * Litchfield County
   * Cannabis
   * Connecticut
   * Education
   * Opinion
 * Obituaries
 * Classifieds

 * Sports
   * High Schools
   * MLB
   * NFL
   * NBA
   * NHL
   * UConn
 * Living
   * Home and Garden
 * Cars

 * Entertainment
   * Arts
   * Movies
   * Music
   * Television
   * Comics
   * Puzzles
 * Advertising Features
   * Events
 * Digital Edition

 * Best Of
   * Education
   * Home Services
   * Legal Services
   * Senior Living
 * Business
   * Top Workplaces
   * Top Workplaces
 * Jobs

 * Home
   * Contact Us
   * Subscribe
   * Advertise with us
   * Newsletters
   * Newsstand Locations
   * Today's Paper
   * Help
   * Privacy Notice
   * Terms of Use

 * News
   * Torrington
   * Winsted
   * Litchfield County
   * Cannabis
   * Connecticut
   * Education
   * Opinion

 * Sports
   * High Schools
   * MLB
   * NFL
   * NBA
   * NHL
   * UConn
 * Obituaries

 * Entertainment
   * Arts
   * Movies
   * Music
   * Television
   * Comics
   * Puzzles
 * Jobs

 * Best Of
   * Education
   * Home Services
   * Legal Services
   * Senior Living
 * Business
   * Top Workplaces
   * Top Workplaces

 * Living
   * Home and Garden
 * Advertising Features
   * Events
 * Classifieds
 * Cars
 * Digital Edition




RECOMMENDED


Warner Theatre presents 'Floyd Nation' in April

Torrington property owners can get funding to remove lead paint

Spice320 a dream come true for Colebrook chef, builder

Torrington honors those who made an impact during city's history

Rash of Winsted resignations mostly due to pay, town manager says

Oakville theater group presents history-based comedy

Falls Village library presents Shape+Movement+Color

Crescendo to perform early Baroque concerts in Lakeville, Great B

Torrington theater screening a variety of movies

Waterbury museum opening new art shows March 3



News


BENEFIT PAYMENT CHANGE HURTS POOR

Dan Wagner, The Center for Public Integrity
June 19, 2013

Comments

This is a carousel. Use Next and Previous buttons to navigate

3
1of3Juliet Carter poses for a portrait at her home, Friday, March 15, 2013, in
Philadelphia. (Matt Rourke/AP)APShow MoreShow Less 2of3Juliet Carter, 57, was
evicted from her apartment after six months' worth of disability benefits was
stolen from Direct Express, a card issued by Comerica Bank on behalf of the U.S.
Treasury Department. Treasury has been pushing people who prefer paper checks to
enroll in Direct Express. (Matt Rourke/AP)APShow MoreShow Less

3of3
 * 
 * 
 * 

A government initiative aimed at saving money by eliminating paper checks is
hurting some recipients of federal benefits while earning the bank that operates
the program millions in fees charged to consumers.

The U.S. Treasury Department has been urging people who collect Social Security
and other benefits to switch to direct deposit rather than rely on mailed
checks, to save millions of dollars a year in administrative costs.



But beneficiaries without bank accounts -- and even some who do have accounts --
are being pressured into using prepaid debit cards offered by Comerica Bank, an
effort that is shifting costs to elderly people, veterans and other vulnerable
consumers.



The Treasury Department launched the program in 2008, teaming up with the
Dallas-based bank to issue the "Direct Express" debit cards in a deal that
lacked the open competition or transparency of most federal contracts.

The exclusive agreement -- whose financial details are not public -- was then
renegotiated to make it more lucrative for the bank while Treasury took over
responsibilities that were originally Comerica's.



Now millions of poor people who rely on Social Security and Supplemental
Security Income are using debit cards that may be ill-suited to their needs and
can cost them more than paper checks or direct deposit to a bank account.

Meanwhile, Treasury is saving money and Comerica is booking profits.

"To stand in the way of the purpose of the programs is appalling, and that's
really what they're doing," says Rebecca Vallas, a Philadelphia attorney who
represents federal benefits recipients.

The Senate Special Committee on Aging is holding a hearing Wednesday on the
Treasury program and Treasury's inspector general, its independent, internal
watchdog, is looking into the Comerica deal.



Paper or plastic?

It costs the U.S. government $1.05 to print and mail a check, compared with 9
cents for an electronic transfer, according to testimony last year by Richard
Gregg, Treasury's fiscal assistant secretary, who is set to testify at
Wednesday's hearing.

Congress in 1996 ordered Treasury to eliminate paper checks from the federal
payments system within three years. That mandate, however, gave the department
broad leeway to waive the requirement where it didn't make sense or would impose
hardship.

In 2010, more than 85 percent of all federal payments were electronic, and
Treasury officials decided to make a final push to eliminate the remaining
checks by March of this year. By then most people on Social Security or SSI were
having their payments deposited directly into their bank accounts. Others
received benefits on debit payment cards offered by private companies -- a
choice that can lead to heavy fees.



People who choose to keep receiving paper checks are generally elderly or poor
or both, and don't have bank accounts or access to bank branches. Some mistrust
banks because of abuses and failures they observed during the Great Depression
or the recent financial crisis. Others may not understand how electronic
payments work.

Treasury didn't have a good option for them, so it sought a low-cost payment
card, eventually selecting Comerica to provide Direct Express.

Government prepaid cards are a fast-growing industry. At least $100 billion was
distributed in 2011 on cards for 158 federal, state and local governments'
payment programs, according to a Federal Reserve study published last July. The
cards are similar to those issued with checking accounts, but don't always offer
the same consumer protections.

Comerica has issued 9 million government payments cards, including more than 4
million Direct Express cards, making it the second-biggest issuer, according to
recent investor presentations. Other top issuers of cards used by states and
other governments to deliver payments to consumers include Bank of America, J.P.
Morgan Chase, U.S. Bancorp and Citigroup.



Comerica offered to issue the Direct Express cards at no cost to Treasury, spend
millions to market them and charge consumers lower fees than most privately
issued prepaid cards.

Comerica offered one free ATM withdrawal per month.

Treasury pressure

In January 2011, the government began an all-out push to move the 10.4 million
people who were still receiving paper checks to electronic payments, an effort
that could eventually save $119 million per year.



Treasury resorted to tactics that advocates for the elderly and disabled say
were too pushy and sometimes misleading. Notices papered the walls of Social
Security offices and advertisements looped on the offices' closed circuit
televisions, urging people to go electronic, according to Vallas.

A large countdown clock dominated the government's main webpage for people
seeking information about the change, indicating down to the second how long
people had before their benefits "may be delivered on Direct Express."

Government fliers and websites said anyone who failed to use the card or arrange
direct deposit would be on the wrong side of the law. "Switching to an
electronic payment is not optional -- it's the law," said David Lebryk,
commissioner of Commissioner of the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, in a January
press release titled "Time is Running Out."

In January and February, Treasury mailed thousands of the cards to poor, elderly
and disabled people who had not requested them, hoping they would activate them
anyway.



A Treasury official, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss the program
candidly, said the department tried to send cards to people living in low-income
neighborhoods, because they are less likely to have bank accounts.

People who received cards without requesting them had already received two
written notices urging them to pick an electronic payment method. The
high-pressure appeals were necessary, Treasury officials say, to get the
attention of Americans who cling to paper checks despite decades of
opportunities to embrace direct deposit.

Customer service employees were trained to get people to accept Direct Express,
regardless of whether it was the best option for them, according to interviews
with call center employees who spoke on condition of anonymity and a Center for
Public Integrity review of transcripts and recordings of calls to Treasury's
call center.

Operators provided inaccurate information on seven of 10 calls placed in
February by a former call center worker who conducted a personal investigation
because he was unhappy with how the call center was operated. The worker spoke
on condition of anonymity because he had agreed not to discuss it as a condition
of employment.



On at least five calls, operators denied that certain groups were allowed to
keep receiving paper checks. Several said people who failed to switch to
electronic payments would be mailed a card automatically after the March 1
deadline. One told the caller that using direct deposit to a bank account "would
incur more fees" than enrolling in Direct Express.

A February memo instructed the call center workers not to offer waivers to
callers, allowing them to continue to receive paper checks, "unless they
specifically ask for one." When callers insist they qualify and want to obtain a
waiver, operators should transfer the call to a group that would provide that
information "ONLY AS A LAST RESORT," says the memo.

The aggressive campaign worked. By the agency's self-imposed deadline of March
1, 2013, it had cut the number of paper checks to 3.5 million, saving the
government about $79 million per year. If the remaining holdouts went
electronic, the government could save another $40 million per year.

Juliet Carter was one of the people who were persuaded to enroll in Direct
Express. The 57-year-old former cook, who was living on government disability
benefits after being hit by a car five years ago, was spooked by the notices
that accompanied her checks urging her to sign up for Direct Express or risk
being "out of compliance with the law."



She phoned the number listed on the flyers and switched to the card. Within
months, identity thieves had redirected her benefits to a different account and
stolen six months of her income. She was evicted from her apartment and has
spent the past few months renting rooms in houses or staying with her sister.

"I've learned I can't trust those cards," said Carter. She says she prefers a
paper check because "it comes direct from Social Security to the mailbox to me,
and I feel safer."

Treasury says the cards are far less susceptible to fraud than paper checks.

In a prepared statement, Treasury spokeswoman Suzanne Elio said, "Electronic
payment provides federal beneficiaries a safer, more secure, and convenient
method of receiving their benefits as compared to paper check payments, which
are considerably more vulnerable to fraud."



The agency "took great care" in implementing the electronic payment system and
sought to provide "strong consumer protections" for people without bank
accounts, Elio said.

Social Security and SSI are meant to provide people with secure and accessible
income, says Vallas. "They don't exist for the sake of administrative efficiency
or meeting arbitrary number targets."

Fees mount

Direct Express' fees are lower than those on most payment cards. Still, they can
eat into the benefits of people like Juliet Carter who are living on fixed
incomes, often far from banks or ATMs that participate in the Direct Express
network.



To get a month's worth of cash can require three or four ATM transactions
because of limits on how much money can be withdrawn at a time. At ATMs
participating in Direct Express, customers get one free withdrawal a month
before Comerica charges a 90 cent fee. ATMs outside the network can tack on fees
of $2 or more.


MOST POPULAR

 1. $3.3M prize was Connecticut Lottery’s largest in February so far
 2. Ex-New Fairfield cafeteria aide accused of sexually assaulting student
    ordered not to contact victim
 3. CT DOT faces criticism following overnight tree-cutting: 'Who'd you notify
    before you went and cut it?'
 4. Spice320 a dream come true for Colebrook chef, builder
 5. Former Torrington group home worker gets probation for sexually assaulting
    woman in his care
 6. NY man charged in connection with killing Ridgefield dogs denied probation
    program
 7. Colebrook child psychologist gets 9 months in prison for $148K Medicaid
    insurance fraud


FIND THE BEST NEAR YOU

 * The Best Window Replacement Companies in CT
   
 * The Best Roofers in Connecticut
   
 * Guide to Legal Cannabis Dispensaries in CT
   
 * The Best Personal Injury Lawyers in CT
   
 * The Best Kitchen Remodeling Companies in CT
   
 * The Best Divorce Lawyers in CT
   
 * The Best Vascular Surgeons in CT
   
 * The Best Solar Companies in CT
   

Direct Express may be a good option for people who don't have a bank account, as
Treasury argues, but almost certainly increases costs for those who do have
accounts. Users pay Comerica for most ATM withdrawals, online bill payments and
money transfers -- services that many banks provide for free.

Yet Treasury and Comerica have pushed the card with such vigor that as of June
2012, more than a million people with bank accounts had nonetheless signed up
for Direct Express, according to Gregg's congressional testimony last year.

Comerica spokesman Wayne Mielke declined to comment for this story. Comerica's
contract with Treasury bars it from discussing the program without Treasury's
permission.



Fees benefit bank

Both Treasury and Comerica have strong incentives to push the Direct Express
card. For Treasury, each conversion saves money and moves the government closer
to its aim of eliminating checks.

Comerica receives $5 from Treasury for each card it issues, according to several
people with direct knowledge of the contract. Treasury redacted this information
from copies of the contract provided in response to a Freedom of Information Act
request.

Treasury had made direct payments to Comerica totaling more than $22 million as
of August 2012, including the $5 fee and other charges, according to data
disclosed in response to the FOIA request.



The bank stands to collect millions more through ATM withdrawal fees, payments
from Visa and MasterCard and the interest earned on money that people haven't
yet withdrawn, which Comerica keeps.

Comerica initially was chosen because it offered to issue cards and provide
customer support at no cost to the federal government. After it had won the
deal, Comerica reversed course, saying that it was having trouble making money
off Direct Express, in part because of the high cost of providing telephone
support for people who sometimes call to check their balances multiple times a
day, according to two people with knowledge of the matter. The people spoke on
condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss it.

Without reopening bidding, Treasury agreed in March 2011 to give Comerica $5 per
card, paying retroactively for enrollments since December 2010. Comerica
received millions more to beef up its call centers and prepare for additional
users. The exclusive contract runs until January 2015.

A spokesman for the inspector general declined to comment. The office does not
discuss ongoing audits.



Treasury officials declined to speak on the record about the contract.

Comerica's contract also required it to enroll people in the program and provide
customer service including helping prevent fraud. However, Treasury took over
these responsibilities, setting up a parallel call center at the Federal Reserve
Bank of Dallas, about a mile from Comerica's headquarters. Treasury didn't
reduce Comerica's compensation.

Between October 2011 and the end of August 2012, the Social Security inspector
general received more than 18,000 reports of unauthorized changes or suspected
attempts to make unauthorized changes to payments. Treasury says it put new
procedures in place in January 2012 to reduce fraud.

Yet early this year, the Social Security inspector general's office said it was
still receiving more than 50 such reports a day.



Juliet Carter says Comerica failed to root out the fraud and reissue her lost
payments despite several requests. At one point, she says, a Comerica
representative threatened to investigate her for fraud if she continued to
pursue the matter.

Comerica declined to comment on her case. Mielke, the bank's spokesman, said it
does not comment on individual cases, to protect customers' privacy.

Carter got rid of her Direct Express card, and switched back to paper checks
last year. The repeated notices from Treasury continued to scare her, however,
and earlier this year she signed up to get her payments on a Rush Card, a
private payment card that carries higher fees than Direct Express.

Vallas, her lawyer, helped her apply for a waiver this spring to go back on
paper checks.



The Center for Public Integrity is a non-profit, independent investigative news
outlet. For more of its stories on this topic go to publicintegrity.org









BEST OF

 * Guide to Legal Cannabis Dispensaries in CT
   


MOST POPULAR

 1. $3.3M prize was Connecticut Lottery’s largest in February so far
 2. Ex-New Fairfield cafeteria aide accused of sexually assaulting student
    ordered not to contact victim
 3. CT DOT faces criticism following overnight tree-cutting: 'Who'd you notify
    before you went and cut it?'
 4. Spice320 a dream come true for Colebrook chef, builder
 5. Former Torrington group home worker gets probation for sexually assaulting
    woman in his care
 6. NY man charged in connection with killing Ridgefield dogs denied probation
    program
 7. Colebrook child psychologist gets 9 months in prison for $148K Medicaid
    insurance fraud


FIND THE BEST NEAR YOU

 * The Best Window Replacement Companies in CT
   
 * The Best Roofers in Connecticut
   
 * Guide to Legal Cannabis Dispensaries in CT
   
 * The Best Personal Injury Lawyers in CT
   
 * The Best Kitchen Remodeling Companies in CT
   
 * The Best Divorce Lawyers in CT
   
 * The Best Vascular Surgeons in CT
   
 * The Best Solar Companies in CT
   
















Written By
Dan Wagner, The Center for Public Integrity
View Comments

 * 
 * 

Return to Top
 * About
   * Newspaper Delivery Safety Procedures
   * Privacy Notice
   * Your California Privacy Rights
   * Interest Based Ads
   * Terms of Use
   * Careers
   * Advertising
 * Contact
   * Contact Us
   * Annual DEI Report
   * Hearst Connecticut jobs
   * FAQ
   * Today's e-Edition
 * Connect
   * Subscribe Today
   * Newsletter Sign Up
   * Facebook
   * Twitter
 * 

©2023 Hearst Media Services Connecticut, LLC

YOUR CHOICES REGARDING COOKIES

We and third parties may deploy cookies and similar technologies when you use
our site. Please review the information below and select the cookies that you
want to enable. You can continue to the site without accepting these cookies but
certain features may not be available or function properly.

EDITORIAL, FUNCTIONALITY AND SOCIAL MEDIA COOKIES

We use third-party services for commenting, videos, and embedding posts as part
of our news coverage. The providers of these cookies may use the data as
explained in their privacy policies.
 * Twitter(Privacy Policy)
 * Facebook(Privacy Policy)
 * Select All

PERFORMANCE, CONTENT RECOMMENDATION AND PERSONALIZATION COOKIES

We use our own and third-party services to provide content recommendations and
customize your user experience and advertising. The providers of these cookies
may use the data as explained in their privacy policies.
 * Taboola(Privacy Policy)
 * Nativo(Privacy Policy)
 * Blueconic(Privacy Policy)
 * Realm
 * Select All

ANALYTICS

We use cookies to analyze and measure traffic to the site so that we know our
audience, what stories are read, where visitors come from, and how long they
stay. You can opt out of these analytics cookies by unselecting the boxes below.
 * Parsely(Privacy Policy)
 * Google Analytics(Privacy Policy)
 * Chartbeat(Privacy Policy)

Privacy Notice Continue
Privacy Settings


THE SIGN IN SERVICE IS NOT FUNCTIONING RIGHT NOW.


PLEASE TRY AGAIN IN A FEW MINUTES

If the issues continue, please contact our customer service at

Phone:

Email:


PLEASE LOG IN TO VIEW YOUR PROFILE.

Sign In
Hi,


PROFILE SETTINGS

Sign up for newsletters, change password and more


SUBSCRIPTION & BILLING

Place a vacation hold, make a payment and more

Sign Out


You must be signed in to comment

is currently signed in

Sign In